Is there a house bubble in Edmonton?

smalltown

How to figure a home's fundamental value
. z9 ]8 m0 Z# X2 L  u5 P' @3 K8 O- [Leamer says he can tell because homes, just like stocks, have a price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) that he believes determines their fundamental value. The “earnings” part of the ratio consists of the annual rent the house could command. Homebuyers can compare current P/Es with historical levels, Leamer says, to get some idea of whether houses in their cities are becoming overvalued.

& _) X, j/ t  c, Z# E- J4 S3 DNot everyone buys the idea that P/Es dictate value. But investors who completely ignore P/Es do so at their peril, as many have learned in recent years. Leamer, who heads the prestigious Anderson Forecast at the University of California in Los Angeles, points out that the P/E for the Standard & Poor’s 500, a key stock benchmark, was nearly double its previous historical high when the stock market bubble burst in 2000. When home P/Es peaked in California, Boston, Dallas and other markets in the mid-1980s, devastating real estate recessions followed.

. g0 t+ ^$ D/ b& tLeamer didn’t invent the concept of P/Es for homes. But his willingness to proclaim bubbles in several of the nation’s hottest markets has brought him lots of attention recently.
: E& x9 n) O5 ?' s, E
To calculate P/Es for entire cities, Leamer divided the median home price in each by the annual rent for a two-bedroom unit in each city -- and looked at P/Es each year since 1988. Here’s what he found:


In Boston, the residential real estate market’s P/E recently topped 30 -- compared with just under 20 in 1988.
5 z. o; E! m& G! i
San Francisco’s previous peak of 25.6 in 1989 has been eclipsed, with the P/E currently at just over 27.
San Diego’s current P/E is nearly 30, compared with a 1989 high of 23.4.
New York, by contrast, is actually well below previous peaks. The area’s current 22.5 P/E is above its recent nadir of 17.6 in 1993, but down from 28.6 in 1988.
You don’t have to know exact P/Es, however, to spot signs of trouble, Leamer says. Any time there’s a disconnect between prices and the underlying value of homes, as measured by their market rents, there’s the potential for a bubble.

If home prices are rising much faster than rents, as is true in Los Angeles, that’s a strong indication a bubble is forming.

8 G" o7 K; @/ \4 gIf home prices are rising while average rents are falling -- which is the situation in San Francisco -- the bubble is pretty much unmistakable.

Home P/E ratios for 9 metro areas
3 |4 H2 V/ M/ @( N; m; l/ N1 I Avg. 1988-2000 2001
% F! {, i, t" XBoston  20.5 30.2
3 o' q6 J, J$ S  b$ s; d7 Z& \6 o9 hSan Diego  22.8 29.7
+ ]' b4 }% S$ `2 m* Y& gSan Francisco  23.8 27.2
) `- d5 z5 }" T/ x0 }" ~Los Angeles  21.3 25.6
8 J' o- U0 |) ~6 A! eSeattle  20.4 25
Denver  17.7 23.7
0 {' i* H( l$ T& ?; a/ V% RNew York  21.2 22.5
Chicago  17.2 20.8
  \$ ]+ f: V6 t; T: ]9 o$ [Washington, D.C.  17.1 20.4
* g2 Q2 r5 D8 G) \( ]$ j6 s* J2 N
8 {7 N, B. a0 x) g
! x& z" `0 U- q# {
( S, p+ A6 Q1 U! _It's difficult to compare P/Es from one city with those from another. P/Es in Atlantic City, N.J., have wavered between 17.3 and 11.6 since 1988; in San Diego, P/Es have not dropped below 20. But you can look on the P/E as a measure of risk -- that is, the higher the P/E is above its average level, the greater the risk, no matter where you live.

- G5 r5 e; l9 M# I- p5 g9 I
From: http://moneycentral.msn.com/cont ... ingguide/P37631.asp

CANDYMAN

Who has the P/E for Edmonton for the last 20 years, please post it here.

) n! N: f  \+ `$ C8 fit would be a good reference.
, p+ l( b6 b% }: G
thanks

醉酒当歌

20% buble at least. And it can take 3-5 years to digest the bubble if not burst.

[ 本帖最后由 醉酒当歌 于 2007-1-14 16:41 编辑 ]