Is there a house bubble in Edmonton?

smalltown

How to figure a home's fundamental value
& L4 D+ T8 g3 a% x9 s* r( ?Leamer says he can tell because homes, just like stocks, have a price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) that he believes determines their fundamental value. The “earnings” part of the ratio consists of the annual rent the house could command. Homebuyers can compare current P/Es with historical levels, Leamer says, to get some idea of whether houses in their cities are becoming overvalued.
/ s) Q5 e$ x3 I" i$ w9 h
Not everyone buys the idea that P/Es dictate value. But investors who completely ignore P/Es do so at their peril, as many have learned in recent years. Leamer, who heads the prestigious Anderson Forecast at the University of California in Los Angeles, points out that the P/E for the Standard & Poor’s 500, a key stock benchmark, was nearly double its previous historical high when the stock market bubble burst in 2000. When home P/Es peaked in California, Boston, Dallas and other markets in the mid-1980s, devastating real estate recessions followed.
. R  M: m/ M* z( X! \2 H
: ~( W. Z) ~! H: G1 F; r4 GLeamer didn’t invent the concept of P/Es for homes. But his willingness to proclaim bubbles in several of the nation’s hottest markets has brought him lots of attention recently.

To calculate P/Es for entire cities, Leamer divided the median home price in each by the annual rent for a two-bedroom unit in each city -- and looked at P/Es each year since 1988. Here’s what he found:
1 p* j3 R; x" @- x9 Y; @

In Boston, the residential real estate market’s P/E recently topped 30 -- compared with just under 20 in 1988.
1 e- b% v) Y) K6 v) D& j+ O
San Francisco’s previous peak of 25.6 in 1989 has been eclipsed, with the P/E currently at just over 27.
7 ?5 ~& f& m" @; WSan Diego’s current P/E is nearly 30, compared with a 1989 high of 23.4.
New York, by contrast, is actually well below previous peaks. The area’s current 22.5 P/E is above its recent nadir of 17.6 in 1993, but down from 28.6 in 1988.
' A, Y% r4 `, b& P& @+ m* s0 nYou don’t have to know exact P/Es, however, to spot signs of trouble, Leamer says. Any time there’s a disconnect between prices and the underlying value of homes, as measured by their market rents, there’s the potential for a bubble.
& n% M! L% c) J( K' @  ^
If home prices are rising much faster than rents, as is true in Los Angeles, that’s a strong indication a bubble is forming.
* o& A- U) I: F+ v3 Q  P
If home prices are rising while average rents are falling -- which is the situation in San Francisco -- the bubble is pretty much unmistakable.

0 B/ z2 {% Z1 L' ? Home P/E ratios for 9 metro areas
Avg. 1988-2000 2001
" r7 i9 |3 `2 g) t; }Boston  20.5 30.2
* Y+ Q* g% t( |  \) d& |( Q+ ISan Diego  22.8 29.7
) r: x$ l/ V6 M0 l' F/ dSan Francisco  23.8 27.2
& D% \8 [7 _9 H6 K8 i' bLos Angeles  21.3 25.6
Seattle  20.4 25
Denver  17.7 23.7
6 k) A; `5 D+ E$ m1 {New York  21.2 22.5
Chicago  17.2 20.8
: C7 L4 t+ p7 f: fWashington, D.C.  17.1 20.4

# f7 c1 r; c, r* [6 \

It's difficult to compare P/Es from one city with those from another. P/Es in Atlantic City, N.J., have wavered between 17.3 and 11.6 since 1988; in San Diego, P/Es have not dropped below 20. But you can look on the P/E as a measure of risk -- that is, the higher the P/E is above its average level, the greater the risk, no matter where you live.
0 e6 m8 P& i7 I3 D3 q" X

0 T5 b! c% S6 n- B3 h8 EFrom: http://moneycentral.msn.com/cont ... ingguide/P37631.asp

CANDYMAN

Who has the P/E for Edmonton for the last 20 years, please post it here.
1 ~2 |/ o; Q) w& U
# _4 G& F, e& v# C) xit would be a good reference.

! |6 ~- k6 p# `2 F7 e- L; nthanks

醉酒当歌

20% buble at least. And it can take 3-5 years to digest the bubble if not burst.
* S2 p: |% F! d
0 A8 p+ I* Z8 D- s* Z, v[ 本帖最后由 醉酒当歌 于 2007-1-14 16:41 编辑 ]