Is there a house bubble in Edmonton?

smalltown

How to figure a home's fundamental value
Leamer says he can tell because homes, just like stocks, have a price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) that he believes determines their fundamental value. The “earnings” part of the ratio consists of the annual rent the house could command. Homebuyers can compare current P/Es with historical levels, Leamer says, to get some idea of whether houses in their cities are becoming overvalued.
& D% b  ]( R. M7 K  v4 T& d
. D/ e7 `6 n1 }( O7 p4 {. t# I) nNot everyone buys the idea that P/Es dictate value. But investors who completely ignore P/Es do so at their peril, as many have learned in recent years. Leamer, who heads the prestigious Anderson Forecast at the University of California in Los Angeles, points out that the P/E for the Standard & Poor’s 500, a key stock benchmark, was nearly double its previous historical high when the stock market bubble burst in 2000. When home P/Es peaked in California, Boston, Dallas and other markets in the mid-1980s, devastating real estate recessions followed.

Leamer didn’t invent the concept of P/Es for homes. But his willingness to proclaim bubbles in several of the nation’s hottest markets has brought him lots of attention recently.
1 Z9 a) S4 y. w  F
To calculate P/Es for entire cities, Leamer divided the median home price in each by the annual rent for a two-bedroom unit in each city -- and looked at P/Es each year since 1988. Here’s what he found:

6 [4 o/ n7 M& ?. u2 d$ v
In Boston, the residential real estate market’s P/E recently topped 30 -- compared with just under 20 in 1988.

" M9 E/ ?& J3 r' ZSan Francisco’s previous peak of 25.6 in 1989 has been eclipsed, with the P/E currently at just over 27.
- w: U; C' W  O" E" ^" z4 E# hSan Diego’s current P/E is nearly 30, compared with a 1989 high of 23.4.
New York, by contrast, is actually well below previous peaks. The area’s current 22.5 P/E is above its recent nadir of 17.6 in 1993, but down from 28.6 in 1988.
You don’t have to know exact P/Es, however, to spot signs of trouble, Leamer says. Any time there’s a disconnect between prices and the underlying value of homes, as measured by their market rents, there’s the potential for a bubble.
1 I  J. X  i  M! Y5 Q/ z
If home prices are rising much faster than rents, as is true in Los Angeles, that’s a strong indication a bubble is forming.
) H3 s& @# C# I- D* L
If home prices are rising while average rents are falling -- which is the situation in San Francisco -- the bubble is pretty much unmistakable.

+ F+ R  |. j& ~ Home P/E ratios for 9 metro areas
Avg. 1988-2000 2001
* }$ y* l, J9 u) ], wBoston  20.5 30.2
San Diego  22.8 29.7
0 H! |- f4 l4 w0 t, n$ k1 bSan Francisco  23.8 27.2
Los Angeles  21.3 25.6
Seattle  20.4 25
Denver  17.7 23.7
' ]/ Q3 R' g4 g+ j( k3 dNew York  21.2 22.5
( h/ r: n8 H. k# q3 u2 l, ?Chicago  17.2 20.8
" m, g8 P6 J7 ?5 TWashington, D.C.  17.1 20.4



It's difficult to compare P/Es from one city with those from another. P/Es in Atlantic City, N.J., have wavered between 17.3 and 11.6 since 1988; in San Diego, P/Es have not dropped below 20. But you can look on the P/E as a measure of risk -- that is, the higher the P/E is above its average level, the greater the risk, no matter where you live.


From: http://moneycentral.msn.com/cont ... ingguide/P37631.asp

CANDYMAN

Who has the P/E for Edmonton for the last 20 years, please post it here.
, F- D- X+ R0 r, ]4 p
0 l% X& g! Q+ V$ y- dit would be a good reference.

thanks

醉酒当歌

20% buble at least. And it can take 3-5 years to digest the bubble if not burst.
) w+ H2 e) m9 A1 h/ M2 Z/ j
& y' O; R6 O% R" }( o) G3 J3 ~[ 本帖最后由 醉酒当歌 于 2007-1-14 16:41 编辑 ]