Is there a house bubble in Edmonton?

smalltown

How to figure a home's fundamental value
Leamer says he can tell because homes, just like stocks, have a price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) that he believes determines their fundamental value. The “earnings” part of the ratio consists of the annual rent the house could command. Homebuyers can compare current P/Es with historical levels, Leamer says, to get some idea of whether houses in their cities are becoming overvalued.

Not everyone buys the idea that P/Es dictate value. But investors who completely ignore P/Es do so at their peril, as many have learned in recent years. Leamer, who heads the prestigious Anderson Forecast at the University of California in Los Angeles, points out that the P/E for the Standard & Poor’s 500, a key stock benchmark, was nearly double its previous historical high when the stock market bubble burst in 2000. When home P/Es peaked in California, Boston, Dallas and other markets in the mid-1980s, devastating real estate recessions followed.

Leamer didn’t invent the concept of P/Es for homes. But his willingness to proclaim bubbles in several of the nation’s hottest markets has brought him lots of attention recently.

7 z# B. X( J& y* Y/ fTo calculate P/Es for entire cities, Leamer divided the median home price in each by the annual rent for a two-bedroom unit in each city -- and looked at P/Es each year since 1988. Here’s what he found:

+ K0 X$ H) K1 U% B
In Boston, the residential real estate market’s P/E recently topped 30 -- compared with just under 20 in 1988.

San Francisco’s previous peak of 25.6 in 1989 has been eclipsed, with the P/E currently at just over 27.
* r8 j* j3 P+ i' P6 s' Q3 k8 {2 S' Q: OSan Diego’s current P/E is nearly 30, compared with a 1989 high of 23.4.
& F/ D+ T/ e8 bNew York, by contrast, is actually well below previous peaks. The area’s current 22.5 P/E is above its recent nadir of 17.6 in 1993, but down from 28.6 in 1988.
3 c8 `1 X- \& E0 F6 g( ^You don’t have to know exact P/Es, however, to spot signs of trouble, Leamer says. Any time there’s a disconnect between prices and the underlying value of homes, as measured by their market rents, there’s the potential for a bubble.
  {4 M6 N/ t6 G$ p8 V
+ g/ b5 ^: D: l+ p; z! l8 y! uIf home prices are rising much faster than rents, as is true in Los Angeles, that’s a strong indication a bubble is forming.
5 k' ]% ^* T+ g, r  M" }
& ^1 S* S& L# Z# \) l" PIf home prices are rising while average rents are falling -- which is the situation in San Francisco -- the bubble is pretty much unmistakable.
: c, O% F! r2 `+ o
, u! D9 I+ K6 d' v; \$ M( P6 n Home P/E ratios for 9 metro areas
Avg. 1988-2000 2001
$ @# ], d5 M5 H. T' T5 @0 OBoston  20.5 30.2
San Diego  22.8 29.7
# i: e; ]1 S  _2 M: V4 _, nSan Francisco  23.8 27.2
Los Angeles  21.3 25.6
Seattle  20.4 25
' b1 y% R7 E- B+ w1 b) \Denver  17.7 23.7
New York  21.2 22.5
. J8 D& M3 d$ H# gChicago  17.2 20.8
Washington, D.C.  17.1 20.4
8 a% i- z) d. Y7 l* M
$ _$ l+ }5 s0 G# E5 V

It's difficult to compare P/Es from one city with those from another. P/Es in Atlantic City, N.J., have wavered between 17.3 and 11.6 since 1988; in San Diego, P/Es have not dropped below 20. But you can look on the P/E as a measure of risk -- that is, the higher the P/E is above its average level, the greater the risk, no matter where you live.
7 h5 D' W4 b$ a; A2 q
: m" _9 E3 C. D8 h7 F
0 b5 c5 Z! Y- z. n! J* ZFrom: http://moneycentral.msn.com/cont ... ingguide/P37631.asp

CANDYMAN

Who has the P/E for Edmonton for the last 20 years, please post it here.

it would be a good reference.

thanks

醉酒当歌

20% buble at least. And it can take 3-5 years to digest the bubble if not burst.

2 S' m3 C8 }) x  E4 l8 _( P' N[ 本帖最后由 醉酒当歌 于 2007-1-14 16:41 编辑 ]