Is there a house bubble in Edmonton?

smalltown

How to figure a home's fundamental value
Leamer says he can tell because homes, just like stocks, have a price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) that he believes determines their fundamental value. The “earnings” part of the ratio consists of the annual rent the house could command. Homebuyers can compare current P/Es with historical levels, Leamer says, to get some idea of whether houses in their cities are becoming overvalued.
! E% z4 Y' R0 [- M9 H
Not everyone buys the idea that P/Es dictate value. But investors who completely ignore P/Es do so at their peril, as many have learned in recent years. Leamer, who heads the prestigious Anderson Forecast at the University of California in Los Angeles, points out that the P/E for the Standard & Poor’s 500, a key stock benchmark, was nearly double its previous historical high when the stock market bubble burst in 2000. When home P/Es peaked in California, Boston, Dallas and other markets in the mid-1980s, devastating real estate recessions followed.
' @- Y9 i: T" {' r. M' U- b
Leamer didn’t invent the concept of P/Es for homes. But his willingness to proclaim bubbles in several of the nation’s hottest markets has brought him lots of attention recently.
, `$ r- a% G( A# a
+ P/ r, H2 X) x9 ]7 FTo calculate P/Es for entire cities, Leamer divided the median home price in each by the annual rent for a two-bedroom unit in each city -- and looked at P/Es each year since 1988. Here’s what he found:


In Boston, the residential real estate market’s P/E recently topped 30 -- compared with just under 20 in 1988.

  C0 L! ~! Q) E  S" T5 F# d9 ?' `  xSan Francisco’s previous peak of 25.6 in 1989 has been eclipsed, with the P/E currently at just over 27.
San Diego’s current P/E is nearly 30, compared with a 1989 high of 23.4.
New York, by contrast, is actually well below previous peaks. The area’s current 22.5 P/E is above its recent nadir of 17.6 in 1993, but down from 28.6 in 1988.
You don’t have to know exact P/Es, however, to spot signs of trouble, Leamer says. Any time there’s a disconnect between prices and the underlying value of homes, as measured by their market rents, there’s the potential for a bubble.

If home prices are rising much faster than rents, as is true in Los Angeles, that’s a strong indication a bubble is forming.

! _9 X6 {, z" d1 v3 B* @/ @If home prices are rising while average rents are falling -- which is the situation in San Francisco -- the bubble is pretty much unmistakable.
' J/ h* x; e5 c+ j0 b9 j2 \
7 o$ A  k0 ^! _, C Home P/E ratios for 9 metro areas
8 u/ r4 f# E/ T" A3 j. C  p Avg. 1988-2000 2001
- B& M! v7 n; E2 kBoston  20.5 30.2
San Diego  22.8 29.7
San Francisco  23.8 27.2
0 ]% k) K& \' n, S) K6 u: l% mLos Angeles  21.3 25.6
Seattle  20.4 25
Denver  17.7 23.7
( t. K( B1 `& a8 ]New York  21.2 22.5
& \7 z! t& e2 ~0 J, |Chicago  17.2 20.8
  `: I( I( W4 R# W2 O) r: M2 `Washington, D.C.  17.1 20.4

. C) G, G& n8 a: O; n9 F
+ v4 c2 ?6 S& I
It's difficult to compare P/Es from one city with those from another. P/Es in Atlantic City, N.J., have wavered between 17.3 and 11.6 since 1988; in San Diego, P/Es have not dropped below 20. But you can look on the P/E as a measure of risk -- that is, the higher the P/E is above its average level, the greater the risk, no matter where you live.

/ Z4 ~: s; h3 L, L0 R
" D0 O% f% d( \- A, wFrom: http://moneycentral.msn.com/cont ... ingguide/P37631.asp

CANDYMAN

Who has the P/E for Edmonton for the last 20 years, please post it here.
6 i8 i5 E5 D& b6 v
it would be a good reference.
/ W  _& A- u! `  a6 G
) e( c" g: X9 K1 ^7 s2 Tthanks

醉酒当歌

20% buble at least. And it can take 3-5 years to digest the bubble if not burst.
' |$ f/ m- v: i/ l
[ 本帖最后由 醉酒当歌 于 2007-1-14 16:41 编辑 ]