Is there a house bubble in Edmonton?

smalltown

How to figure a home's fundamental value
Leamer says he can tell because homes, just like stocks, have a price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) that he believes determines their fundamental value. The “earnings” part of the ratio consists of the annual rent the house could command. Homebuyers can compare current P/Es with historical levels, Leamer says, to get some idea of whether houses in their cities are becoming overvalued.
' {1 o# M( V- P) t; ?% }. N
7 p  Q' r/ O1 c2 K1 T7 Y4 D2 SNot everyone buys the idea that P/Es dictate value. But investors who completely ignore P/Es do so at their peril, as many have learned in recent years. Leamer, who heads the prestigious Anderson Forecast at the University of California in Los Angeles, points out that the P/E for the Standard & Poor’s 500, a key stock benchmark, was nearly double its previous historical high when the stock market bubble burst in 2000. When home P/Es peaked in California, Boston, Dallas and other markets in the mid-1980s, devastating real estate recessions followed.

: [: r% z% \1 l+ m$ l1 T: s& ZLeamer didn’t invent the concept of P/Es for homes. But his willingness to proclaim bubbles in several of the nation’s hottest markets has brought him lots of attention recently.
* {3 b3 Y- u4 P4 ]% {4 p* x. ?% q
To calculate P/Es for entire cities, Leamer divided the median home price in each by the annual rent for a two-bedroom unit in each city -- and looked at P/Es each year since 1988. Here’s what he found:
7 g% ~9 O0 g3 N

In Boston, the residential real estate market’s P/E recently topped 30 -- compared with just under 20 in 1988.
- ]8 A' }" z0 d
7 E4 |5 K/ M4 s$ w  uSan Francisco’s previous peak of 25.6 in 1989 has been eclipsed, with the P/E currently at just over 27.
San Diego’s current P/E is nearly 30, compared with a 1989 high of 23.4.
9 @( l* X1 \4 O2 [New York, by contrast, is actually well below previous peaks. The area’s current 22.5 P/E is above its recent nadir of 17.6 in 1993, but down from 28.6 in 1988.
( R4 |$ v" k' RYou don’t have to know exact P/Es, however, to spot signs of trouble, Leamer says. Any time there’s a disconnect between prices and the underlying value of homes, as measured by their market rents, there’s the potential for a bubble.
3 K! w# i0 @/ i8 ?
0 d$ w) T9 r5 M; @  M# q; ?If home prices are rising much faster than rents, as is true in Los Angeles, that’s a strong indication a bubble is forming.

3 Z) h* `2 r; h* V! r& A3 IIf home prices are rising while average rents are falling -- which is the situation in San Francisco -- the bubble is pretty much unmistakable.
' b! w7 K: A5 _* J; {% X" L
Home P/E ratios for 9 metro areas
6 q5 h" t* l/ j7 c Avg. 1988-2000 2001
" ~9 p- y" n, s2 n8 n/ l( @Boston  20.5 30.2
San Diego  22.8 29.7
San Francisco  23.8 27.2
Los Angeles  21.3 25.6
Seattle  20.4 25
4 c1 B. G3 h6 J7 DDenver  17.7 23.7
New York  21.2 22.5
6 e% l" o% P5 X/ yChicago  17.2 20.8
: ~1 z( @/ k* a+ e5 E+ {% EWashington, D.C.  17.1 20.4

  f" G7 l6 F1 M; v# f6 i
; x1 m  k  t  F/ N$ ~
It's difficult to compare P/Es from one city with those from another. P/Es in Atlantic City, N.J., have wavered between 17.3 and 11.6 since 1988; in San Diego, P/Es have not dropped below 20. But you can look on the P/E as a measure of risk -- that is, the higher the P/E is above its average level, the greater the risk, no matter where you live.

$ J- N( r# f  m2 k" p4 R
& a( ~9 u/ ~& I9 QFrom: http://moneycentral.msn.com/cont ... ingguide/P37631.asp

CANDYMAN

Who has the P/E for Edmonton for the last 20 years, please post it here.
0 ?9 {  s: u& ?% y
it would be a good reference.
. ~$ z- u& Y: k" E2 h+ a% n
1 l: E0 n4 z  U9 L+ a3 xthanks

醉酒当歌

20% buble at least. And it can take 3-5 years to digest the bubble if not burst.

1 f% g2 e# X: K  c1 L[ 本帖最后由 醉酒当歌 于 2007-1-14 16:41 编辑 ]