Is there a house bubble in Edmonton?

smalltown

How to figure a home's fundamental value
7 b- j: B; u, g! r; yLeamer says he can tell because homes, just like stocks, have a price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) that he believes determines their fundamental value. The “earnings” part of the ratio consists of the annual rent the house could command. Homebuyers can compare current P/Es with historical levels, Leamer says, to get some idea of whether houses in their cities are becoming overvalued.

Not everyone buys the idea that P/Es dictate value. But investors who completely ignore P/Es do so at their peril, as many have learned in recent years. Leamer, who heads the prestigious Anderson Forecast at the University of California in Los Angeles, points out that the P/E for the Standard & Poor’s 500, a key stock benchmark, was nearly double its previous historical high when the stock market bubble burst in 2000. When home P/Es peaked in California, Boston, Dallas and other markets in the mid-1980s, devastating real estate recessions followed.
0 C% a0 o. e9 A! Y& ?! {
Leamer didn’t invent the concept of P/Es for homes. But his willingness to proclaim bubbles in several of the nation’s hottest markets has brought him lots of attention recently.

To calculate P/Es for entire cities, Leamer divided the median home price in each by the annual rent for a two-bedroom unit in each city -- and looked at P/Es each year since 1988. Here’s what he found:

, @. E7 M9 T% a% i" [
In Boston, the residential real estate market’s P/E recently topped 30 -- compared with just under 20 in 1988.

San Francisco’s previous peak of 25.6 in 1989 has been eclipsed, with the P/E currently at just over 27.
San Diego’s current P/E is nearly 30, compared with a 1989 high of 23.4.
New York, by contrast, is actually well below previous peaks. The area’s current 22.5 P/E is above its recent nadir of 17.6 in 1993, but down from 28.6 in 1988.
8 Q  C) H5 ?. AYou don’t have to know exact P/Es, however, to spot signs of trouble, Leamer says. Any time there’s a disconnect between prices and the underlying value of homes, as measured by their market rents, there’s the potential for a bubble.
. o0 T$ X! O8 ]  X( W: M. U& I
) V: ^+ V! F6 m5 t/ ~3 r9 S1 @If home prices are rising much faster than rents, as is true in Los Angeles, that’s a strong indication a bubble is forming.
2 t$ {/ X* I  ]( i9 w
. U& a3 `% G8 `& \  b9 ^( y+ Z  }If home prices are rising while average rents are falling -- which is the situation in San Francisco -- the bubble is pretty much unmistakable.

Home P/E ratios for 9 metro areas
8 L. U8 L! a% h- b4 V& \ Avg. 1988-2000 2001
Boston  20.5 30.2
San Diego  22.8 29.7
# Z: M0 \9 b. i- @0 N' h+ B5 _San Francisco  23.8 27.2
Los Angeles  21.3 25.6
" E$ e" z% @* s- t# _Seattle  20.4 25
; w4 P* m4 S/ Y5 QDenver  17.7 23.7
New York  21.2 22.5
Chicago  17.2 20.8
Washington, D.C.  17.1 20.4
2 `' I- F) f# S" a4 j, Q0 [+ J


It's difficult to compare P/Es from one city with those from another. P/Es in Atlantic City, N.J., have wavered between 17.3 and 11.6 since 1988; in San Diego, P/Es have not dropped below 20. But you can look on the P/E as a measure of risk -- that is, the higher the P/E is above its average level, the greater the risk, no matter where you live.
5 c4 B" L0 c4 h! M& H, T/ I
( u2 \! S  L/ L0 s+ A& x. N
, }5 w; W. f) w( m, t7 m- @0 J) L/ dFrom: http://moneycentral.msn.com/cont ... ingguide/P37631.asp

CANDYMAN

Who has the P/E for Edmonton for the last 20 years, please post it here.

' [. D8 c& N5 Ait would be a good reference.
5 Q% I% u+ t+ w! ?
0 {9 o5 {: \, p2 L( C) s  _thanks

醉酒当歌

20% buble at least. And it can take 3-5 years to digest the bubble if not burst.

7 i) [7 B( C! s. T* v[ 本帖最后由 醉酒当歌 于 2007-1-14 16:41 编辑 ]