Is there a house bubble in Edmonton?

smalltown

How to figure a home's fundamental value
" r3 p  j/ p" i' \! x" O: DLeamer says he can tell because homes, just like stocks, have a price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) that he believes determines their fundamental value. The “earnings” part of the ratio consists of the annual rent the house could command. Homebuyers can compare current P/Es with historical levels, Leamer says, to get some idea of whether houses in their cities are becoming overvalued.
3 P5 X# O/ ^9 D( N  _" f
Not everyone buys the idea that P/Es dictate value. But investors who completely ignore P/Es do so at their peril, as many have learned in recent years. Leamer, who heads the prestigious Anderson Forecast at the University of California in Los Angeles, points out that the P/E for the Standard & Poor’s 500, a key stock benchmark, was nearly double its previous historical high when the stock market bubble burst in 2000. When home P/Es peaked in California, Boston, Dallas and other markets in the mid-1980s, devastating real estate recessions followed.

7 A* E, M% E; k' f$ lLeamer didn’t invent the concept of P/Es for homes. But his willingness to proclaim bubbles in several of the nation’s hottest markets has brought him lots of attention recently.

1 O$ B9 Q3 J, F  G/ ?To calculate P/Es for entire cities, Leamer divided the median home price in each by the annual rent for a two-bedroom unit in each city -- and looked at P/Es each year since 1988. Here’s what he found:
$ R  S0 O' |; h. F

In Boston, the residential real estate market’s P/E recently topped 30 -- compared with just under 20 in 1988.
) |9 I% ]6 i! ~: j  w0 O
San Francisco’s previous peak of 25.6 in 1989 has been eclipsed, with the P/E currently at just over 27.
San Diego’s current P/E is nearly 30, compared with a 1989 high of 23.4.
# d1 g  y8 B. _New York, by contrast, is actually well below previous peaks. The area’s current 22.5 P/E is above its recent nadir of 17.6 in 1993, but down from 28.6 in 1988.
You don’t have to know exact P/Es, however, to spot signs of trouble, Leamer says. Any time there’s a disconnect between prices and the underlying value of homes, as measured by their market rents, there’s the potential for a bubble.

# R1 L4 B) x' C$ \/ n1 m7 ~+ zIf home prices are rising much faster than rents, as is true in Los Angeles, that’s a strong indication a bubble is forming.
, L$ J' `8 D  B3 N- @' N- p4 g; x2 W
If home prices are rising while average rents are falling -- which is the situation in San Francisco -- the bubble is pretty much unmistakable.
1 [8 X+ \! o3 e! Q
Home P/E ratios for 9 metro areas
) S, @! U& o# d$ b! d5 M5 l Avg. 1988-2000 2001
  j' b( T+ T! w/ E! vBoston  20.5 30.2
* X/ I7 Y+ E$ L6 n$ ySan Diego  22.8 29.7
7 G9 ~8 B3 E+ M; f8 _5 ASan Francisco  23.8 27.2
Los Angeles  21.3 25.6
Seattle  20.4 25
Denver  17.7 23.7
6 v( B( W; i( W8 T" s9 |New York  21.2 22.5
Chicago  17.2 20.8
# w% Y) j- ?+ d* [9 A4 xWashington, D.C.  17.1 20.4

& N" [" ?% P* C% @/ h& ]; i# T: o3 A- Q
% J6 u3 c9 \) \' s1 A# c7 w/ B
It's difficult to compare P/Es from one city with those from another. P/Es in Atlantic City, N.J., have wavered between 17.3 and 11.6 since 1988; in San Diego, P/Es have not dropped below 20. But you can look on the P/E as a measure of risk -- that is, the higher the P/E is above its average level, the greater the risk, no matter where you live.
) T4 ~/ l+ I. J* U8 p

From: http://moneycentral.msn.com/cont ... ingguide/P37631.asp

CANDYMAN

Who has the P/E for Edmonton for the last 20 years, please post it here.
; P: ~, y; f  k2 s5 r
; ^4 X+ p/ w4 K/ S* C9 lit would be a good reference.

thanks

醉酒当歌

20% buble at least. And it can take 3-5 years to digest the bubble if not burst.
3 Q$ o+ i/ V4 E6 |  X% l) n; ~) ~$ x
[ 本帖最后由 醉酒当歌 于 2007-1-14 16:41 编辑 ]