 鲜花( 1)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
本帖最后由 xchen 于 2015-12-4 17:02 编辑
+ p) E8 N; \. J( ^; { r2 P' ~; p9 z6 K+ l% T
* F6 z6 k4 [9 C9 x) S% t5 n' V. ?If total is 4%, then, calculate the amount for traditional way for a house sold in 400,000, you'll find it will be 4% for total (100000*0.07 + 300000*0.03)/400000 = 0.04, so the same for both. 8 W' z" N+ g) F! u/ I( H; u8 r$ G
5 w' E$ Z1 _1 ]( G5 ], ZLet's try to calculate the rate for the traditional way: y = (0.07*100000 + (x-100000))/x => y=4000/x + 0.03
+ [9 O( p5 B ^1 T9 T( O3 i" B
* r, k+ X6 l# a% Zcomparing 2 realtors using above formular, you will see : 1) if total sale value (x in the formular) > 400,000, traditional realtor < 0.04, then traditional is better since it's < 0.04; 2) total sale value < 400,000, 2% realtor is better since traditional one > 0.04 3) if sale value is 400,000, both are the same..9 {9 ^! v4 f- P
! T4 }7 O8 x; Q2 N2 `% J
Note: above comparison is based on the assumption: 2% realtor means 2% for each side realtor (i.e., total 4%) . @# i9 a. t+ U$ A; ~2 s' _
|
|