| 
  鲜花(1 )   鸡蛋(0 ) | 
| 本帖最后由 xchen 于 2015-12-4 17:02 编辑 $ S: ?, b1 \2 j7 d% x4 L# b 
 $ a% l& v2 v2 k6 e; h% n7 N1 i. S; L1 @, B) ^
 If total is 4%, then, calculate the amount for traditional way for a house sold in 400,000, you'll find it will be 4% for total (100000*0.07 + 300000*0.03)/400000 = 0.04, so the same for both.  . T7 S  U4 r) ^5 @  m$ o
 
 . Z( y6 m3 h7 v1 ILet's try to calculate the rate for the traditional way: y = (0.07*100000 + (x-100000))/x => y=4000/x + 0.032 O) B6 U/ m' z  g5 k: P! C/ g/ E, d
 
 & l; C9 D, N& n8 pcomparing 2 realtors using above formular, you will see : 1) if total sale value (x in the formular) > 400,000, traditional realtor < 0.04, then traditional is better since it's < 0.04; 2) total sale value < 400,000, 2% realtor is better since traditional one > 0.04 3) if sale value is 400,000, both are the same..
 / k: H2 a0 x5 X- |9 B+ R% y$ D+ \  p: J0 L1 M8 A" ?
 Note: above comparison is based on the assumption: 2% realtor means 2% for each side realtor (i.e., total 4%)
 " `4 z6 K8 S; F9 _# v% P# |
 | 
 |