 鲜花( 1)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
本帖最后由 xchen 于 2015-12-4 17:02 编辑 9 F! |( a7 Q d8 b- }
Edmontonian18 发表于 2015-11-29 03:14
7 G8 a" f6 A$ c9 b$ c' c! J9 g1 W1 W( HOne party 2%, the other party 2%, total 4%. Still a little bit less than tranditional 7% of the 1st ...
5 _$ V, X* R* a9 ^: l7 N; |9 T, O: D9 v# u
If total is 4%, then, calculate the amount for traditional way for a house sold in 400,000, you'll find it will be 4% for total (100000*0.07 + 300000*0.03)/400000 = 0.04, so the same for both.
7 u, G5 o0 C/ o0 } y$ C( p- s+ ~) [! \$ Y1 F0 s( C6 f
Let's try to calculate the rate for the traditional way: y = (0.07*100000 + (x-100000))/x => y=4000/x + 0.03
$ {3 e( y4 ~+ h4 j y& Z3 N# a P g# S
comparing 2 realtors using above formular, you will see : 1) if total sale value (x in the formular) > 400,000, traditional realtor < 0.04, then traditional is better since it's < 0.04; 2) total sale value < 400,000, 2% realtor is better since traditional one > 0.04 3) if sale value is 400,000, both are the same... o& C5 @* l" y3 A+ L0 ?1 ?
% d6 }4 c f# D8 b7 N% f3 _
Note: above comparison is based on the assumption: 2% realtor means 2% for each side realtor (i.e., total 4%) * R- l6 A, f1 J, C! V% @
|
|