埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2694|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
; Z2 }7 G) Y% s* k' X& L1 Z
% w  `( J7 j# u5 Y" b- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -5 v7 v4 H2 m  w/ g  P# {

: ?/ G2 F* S2 p) D$ m3 ^, p    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
' a2 [7 m' J! P6 v3 g/ ]exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third5 e5 |/ }7 K8 L. u! V4 {
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
& W, S& `# z+ A1 rin the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit6 l* T; N1 T/ T1 s- ?7 E: _4 I6 P% J
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
; C: u5 M( P. w: \more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,! C8 ]3 a" X/ x
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal9 b( ?8 G& y5 j3 Z* F
LePage Real Estate Services., \" V2 A5 C: P: C$ s. I; h

6 s9 m" Z: H* R$ Z% F    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
6 \& ]. a4 P/ Y& |; ^, y8 Rare forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic" r% J9 ^& c8 z' n
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
( ^3 X: b# q4 jsound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the; [/ P6 W  D+ Y3 a: y) ]8 h( F6 V8 `
residential real estate sector.
2 L& Z! g; n1 J6 S( S( P
4 a6 C, f/ }$ V" w6 m; Z, X/ D    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
: c* I0 K! j# U$ s; B( Doccurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
% z# `1 `2 f# {year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562, `7 ^8 ]+ w% g  O% K- w, J5 p
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
, J7 y0 V2 U6 S. u7 ]9 q' Q2 G(+13.2%).
; ^2 g$ q; n, ?4 h' b/ y( G) l: X& l
; Z( s6 d- \3 ~) P# ^    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth# g3 ^- B& y. H% \
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
8 z7 O  u! i3 A  w6 j8 w  ]. U- kfrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
# r2 d1 `6 U- ~poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
6 u: N& c1 `/ j8 c9 t: Lpresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
8 o: X3 ]3 K/ S; C3 w"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
' l6 q: o5 Z' m- E% nwelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
* N0 k' q! k  L% _2 e& wbalanced market."+ r/ e& t' A( o+ V$ u
, U* N, X; n( h5 D
    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,# x3 t; e% ^. e# L
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
3 G! H6 U- N8 @1 v3 W6 X' h  gto balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued! M% @  J9 h9 U$ A& ~
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core& Y. v( S. x2 R/ v0 O
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,- }* z; j8 S! u& u/ I
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record2 Q8 x0 a: @7 o8 S2 _
breaking price appreciations.
+ f) E. M5 v7 q0 q
+ u) \+ `' w$ ^6 G$ |) I+ x    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding! ^1 A5 u7 g! `4 R
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the: \6 K- e  p) n/ p2 L7 x/ r
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
, V. o" u" l; W
1 U$ S1 d9 ]) v5 G/ p    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
. e* L# e; B1 m1 d# M3 @economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer* A  a4 u- I! s% G" T; W
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off4 n, s  ]9 S7 F( M. @
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.7 ^: M1 K  I: G) x7 J* p# \5 A
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers0 y! k* B' w5 F- t
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of2 ^+ m0 u) m7 @
price appreciation when compared with 2005.' X6 X8 u  l8 e0 Q  B
4 s0 {0 I8 N* c% ~
    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing# C% Z! k: {4 F% l+ J$ V
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and* R' T% P4 ~$ k- r# x$ g
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
0 {  B! X% y0 s9 d' T; `2 mare markedly different than those found in the United States.! b9 L9 c5 F! Z* E0 n, y

5 B2 `; E3 y# {$ Q2 j* d- L$ [& u    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
# N( E! t& p1 h  d1 y: lAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
$ e; u' M4 ~6 C, Rfavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
# a6 U7 P) L+ Z% j! D- Mrelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general4 a8 P8 v3 t3 i
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
) I3 s/ Y* `* V3 Cdownside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
1 A9 F  G0 }: x- W% baggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
, I/ A* @& x8 ^3 w( x! n6 smortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
9 B, X! V5 o2 V- Q: j7 e. Z+ |2 U; y4 o+ F. K
    <<4 L9 w5 ~% N! D0 r) s" T
                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES
. T& Z3 M- q3 n( e    >>* |7 U6 Q; j8 ]
1 e$ g1 v* ?- S
    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in2 u( e; p: t% |; o
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
' I! g! _0 h1 sof price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time: [; E6 S9 ]) }" {2 ?
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
7 Y2 M" @+ Y8 g8 Q2 }2 ]: Yrenovations.
4 z9 ]7 m4 q5 Z- r1 {  I) G+ A  m  k5 \7 h
    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight4 y9 N& d) U4 }/ L' w% ?- S
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
1 a8 O  b4 C2 R; s+ `6 m( Mcompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and# P6 ]( {+ u- _- K1 N9 {
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.0 [6 u$ n* D0 F! _! \, E

8 G9 x" c2 c3 H( N+ |1 k2 b: k    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
, T. ]( ]& l1 H$ R& K) A2 }' Bslowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
0 b, J0 B% v  n6 @( O9 Pquarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
4 Q# O( \5 R& {* Z0 x9 y9 G# n600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
4 Q8 c! M0 ]( a. o* n8 K; n  X' s' fto the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
5 @' G- Q! D' \& nand are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
% \5 _# W" w# U* ?) m, b2 g
0 ^! b9 w( X' r    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
4 m4 G4 x- c& ]4 T; g  C. hconditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their, Z& \! N; m0 o6 U2 c/ s* l
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
, Q( X9 ]" X6 L. X+ Q+ Q: f3 hwas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
! R/ G0 U; a$ u- \  R. A# Gdollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
: K/ L; Y* ~4 _* dbuyers with more options when looking for a home.
$ ]$ ~+ P; Y+ f; X& s# W- g" D) n
  |. D( J1 k7 g" ^9 j/ \    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
) X( Z0 r+ Z" p( mamong higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes$ H6 s6 N- K( Y  J
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,0 S- D; C. o+ c; @2 j1 E% U
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last! a/ M) |4 ]6 @3 A
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
. k% c  t5 Q7 A# Y2 D7 p- S* {" i) u
    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
( r; a+ Z% Z* W( `: ?( t' y6 _+ q" }9 ~prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory& u6 M# F  s# H; H
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting+ ]9 n3 F6 t+ Y/ _1 T  x9 e
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,; I+ m% M% v1 n$ n; c- B6 e
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
* a& I% R+ R  N& apressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before4 i) O1 g5 p- S; [
making a purchase.
- }& C0 @* u0 K; O4 C  P/ M% l6 P' e/ P( ], S
    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing) L9 ^: W' ]$ _% C& F
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong& D. N# q3 ~$ C1 a/ o8 O3 j6 I
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
! W% e# Z6 L0 W6 T; zcentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
) U/ S, l7 n: `attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
5 y% T9 v. I; d* a0 damenities.
- C! J( |4 r) y# X6 Q4 O" u2 F
1 u- H5 d; J6 S4 k: L    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels( M* d0 M7 h/ D6 F- L9 q
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
* O7 M  }' L- C1 Sacross the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has' T& i' C- u- E7 S& n. U' U
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been! u# O6 v. u: ~* B: Z, ?. k
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
% T0 s! P3 y$ G; k: [7 g! B, vresidence, rather than for investment.
5 |4 w9 ~. @% J3 Q7 f8 u. _# s' o
    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
: _" ]4 j; Z; p$ u. |3 G% shouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted8 ~! H5 t5 `6 y" r. G2 z
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
/ ^, S- M" k5 a3 W& Y2 r$ B% qconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
0 f. ]" S: m# _& {rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
* L2 [6 q$ I5 D# T) jthe market.7 r) q" U* O+ Y( p3 K

' |/ F6 ]. o, D; P9 a    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
2 T4 }, `) h: \" |* |6 {July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In! Q/ x3 C3 F1 D
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
& I* c$ E  X* v% {$ amonths, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
$ o( s. o3 X, m2 z  d$ ^  Gto the shortage of available inventory.  r. _* q  [2 I2 q- L7 b. m
+ Z! _) s* Z! h1 P+ T+ i) V
    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its( K4 g  f( V# F# }! w0 A6 G: t
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
& F9 w) p/ x! p3 X, c* S9 A4 lvibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
5 l6 B" W/ _! c$ W8 I" V% l( vstruggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
2 Y' r& W% |( m0 x/ t0 t" J0 n1 Z; H! w4 ]$ }7 i0 g1 h6 q
    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases7 p+ ?& G& q- T0 f+ @
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
, u# Y( [2 [: Z: A( E9 Z' Gunemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
% z/ i# n( g- ^% _! |) ^* tpressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
, B) \, {6 ~, f1 i( B' S9 Eprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
4 |9 {0 V+ I2 z* s' Q$ `6 ?& wseason - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as- ^7 u0 _1 f* W
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.

3 u! T* O& N# O$ j5 X
- f  i; N) H- t% W) A# S8 w  n0 s    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter0 L( z6 h' b% K4 l8 Y
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton/ H9 p8 F0 j& p5 Y/ a
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,6 w3 C3 H' L) O/ ^" B
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
; z: {) G9 h  Yincreasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve9 q  x2 y; `- {3 ?- y5 Y
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
2 g& n4 T$ g4 S% ptowards the end of 2006.
    # X& t3 G- {: u, v' I
! ~8 W; M* [5 ]
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of) I' [; L1 n/ h
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable6 I- V& C; R1 q
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
  `- j/ c3 X% x; r4 Zgroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to4 C- i- }+ ~/ V& w4 b$ c% D
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
& b% E  F: B  g9 O& n4 M6 Bpressure on tight inventory levels.% j7 b" r( U" d. E7 F
( e; `5 ]" U3 J5 X# F0 e9 `
    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
7 f6 g6 _4 o( X1 H5 [) gfundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
. _8 d% @6 B9 S8 ginto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
5 d  Y) ~; X( e$ n, k/ ]while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching+ x' e; F% K- _/ b0 \8 L
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
; [$ n0 N" V# g, M
5 Y3 F) W$ P; i& j$ X) n    <<5 M6 ~7 ?' T9 j; J, T4 T& B4 T
      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006; y( h# ^$ x" N5 S; j, V

% s) d: w- A! `1 q    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ |/ q6 f( ]" v0 ?5 W                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey& x# t9 y4 v1 U
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------$ A3 }! \6 \+ j' c" r, S/ t
                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q3
" ]+ i+ Y0 p. e- T' T& m    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average+ n* X. F9 y# o+ ^% g
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------, i4 a6 Y, ?7 `, @- p0 f2 S! ?
    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,0008 m; }9 {- f; m, G6 D2 b
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------. `! l3 J; o7 t: N; x' h" h
    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,000
5 h  S) W% [) q    -------------------------------------------------------------------------0 k# r$ f! p  E% p2 K1 k
    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,0000 F  |1 h$ r" i, ~5 J0 H* P
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------: Y) G" ?* h, _0 P
    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -: m# b: A7 I% G9 l  @) x; s
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------9 g2 C# b  K: z+ _1 E
    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,333
( q- s! k  G/ k3 `4 X+ i    -------------------------------------------------------------------------8 ^1 M3 U0 @9 A; S8 k
    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,583# T! p) A/ e) J
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------  ]: V1 h+ c7 F6 [! N0 E
    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,185. P: U+ Z7 r- c: p1 e
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
" Q# a' K# p: R" `% ^" i2 R! R    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,2502 Q2 W) K: O* D- h
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------  n/ o  w  l, C: [: \1 j
    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,766
& ]3 a# R, N0 Y3 N: M    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 i" L: y( ?0 X- i    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,707& [$ X; D( F5 P, `6 x
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 Q% c9 V0 [4 T2 s+ W1 V: I    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,500
# y% y' j: _0 ~- j" d( ?' B& F  a: y    -------------------------------------------------------------------------# g4 y' P/ g' y5 `- C$ J5 O
    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,389
9 r; b3 s- z+ r: L, X0 M    -------------------------------------------------------------------------7 |- e, m6 l* p7 O
    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,714
& b8 p5 Q' R7 I: S  T  f$ D    -------------------------------------------------------------------------6 V4 G9 G' i, p& F
    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,500
  E  ?6 M9 n* n9 ^+ U7 I    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
% n/ K# g8 `! S- k    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,000
3 {4 o8 D& x7 x: g7 A    -------------------------------------------------------------------------3 m" x1 G) Y# T
    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,860
( f" G* l; M$ d# `5 G: z! G    -------------------------------------------------------------------------  L; k6 x% J) h: z

* W1 L3 c/ X6 o4 h% O* Y  I. |    -------------------------------------------------------------
# e+ X, ]0 g. Z' K- V* C                               Standard Condominium# }+ A4 b. W+ j
    -------------------------------------------------------------
/ B! t- \4 w" u0 k: T3 U  y0 H- ]                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo) }' m1 A6 e& n+ p# J! x
    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change
4 ~6 F9 p! L# N' e# p% K0 A/ h- \    -------------------------------------------------------------
. X; I0 [* c: L+ V% d+ l    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%6 ~( e% _, C$ t- w
    -------------------------------------------------------------
4 s, p, S' s# B/ u    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%
. H! Q+ ^3 }/ q) `" }8 t    -------------------------------------------------------------  e  W- d( b7 S  [4 I2 p8 X
    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A4 }2 ^' j$ |8 G9 K3 `
    -------------------------------------------------------------- l/ ^' [! G' f0 W9 D1 t& E4 a
    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A
$ g  ]  Q! T/ c; i$ w3 s/ x    -------------------------------------------------------------
2 L/ U: m% ^% `( Z    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%
8 T, J  \' w  O/ U4 v4 x% [    -------------------------------------------------------------* D" E6 h6 e+ u  y9 A( t% K7 l
    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%2 {( g8 o' L) z' m6 ?) l
    -------------------------------------------------------------0 a" a5 n2 c. d3 h" c, k. X( L9 r
    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%
' N$ B' V5 @, K  ]+ h    -------------------------------------------------------------
  G( R" r0 M8 Z) _! S; h, ^5 E    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%
# D) d5 }& t+ ^! N. J% {7 w    -------------------------------------------------------------) U6 s, V# X& R3 ^6 |0 ]
    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%1 I/ \4 [) G2 c$ N0 H+ X7 Q
    -------------------------------------------------------------/ X: z* k  L3 z$ n9 y* w* _
    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%" J0 O) V5 w0 S; K5 t
    -------------------------------------------------------------6 r  u! w+ B0 a2 k$ n- ]
    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%# w6 f4 Y3 h3 G! q5 H
    -------------------------------------------------------------3 @2 K  \' H0 _2 B
    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%/ i8 U( n2 ]2 V! R. H* y
    -------------------------------------------------------------
5 T- i, O. L  _3 H4 |! w. t) v# G6 I6 M    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%
1 @  F9 W+ D! j* x8 M# C    -------------------------------------------------------------2 |, ?" S: u% j% Z2 w
    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%
! _1 V' t! O0 r! j# H- y& f    -------------------------------------------------------------. Z6 N. f$ R4 n0 Z; D) D
    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%
9 K  P2 h6 L8 y: ~    -------------------------------------------------------------, C  B! o. y  J  Y0 @  _
    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%7 [4 ]8 N# [# n. ?1 `& j# s/ B
    -------------------------------------------------------------# r4 h  W2 J7 u( x3 y- w" V% c
    >>
' E  z4 ~2 J7 t" S1 q" S6 O( n
. r% w& |! @/ ?6 n3 g* I9 I! u( {    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
* G& x& e0 U5 n8 a; gin the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint* y' I: h9 J) R8 E1 X. c  ^
John and Victoria.
" R0 H6 r+ z! Y  |9 z: B6 e6 l3 f, d! `* _4 u
    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
0 s  w0 t- ~6 ~8 _comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of$ c' ^3 V7 S: a/ C6 d( E
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
/ |* q. Y  p- `7 Ereferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
0 A  W0 a+ I. F1 K9 J8 M1 otrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
6 p9 m' \. M7 S" x  H4 Y; Oacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is) _* b9 M8 m* s0 e
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
* W. u, j6 l! R2 B7 k2 L! Rfigures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable9 k$ E7 u- Z$ b) I( }
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
4 [5 H0 S/ W) ]/ p" e5 ANovember 15, 2006.% n! [" h4 i, g/ M! z9 W5 w
    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
( X" W3 m( d  T/ n  }( N+ D! Yfair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
, X* k. N1 E& B" Dprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
) i4 g( A% k" f: f0 z" N, Xavailable for some areas back to the early 1970s.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-9-20 22:29 , Processed in 0.111338 second(s), 11 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表