 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable 1 W! ? W, a" ?- C
+ b8 V! I. v, P' B1 o
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
8 o7 `) |4 C2 A5 D+ e* h) f9 @0 j7 X, h( s2 F/ G
TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market- F9 C% M i+ [6 t
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
$ h2 I2 r9 A1 J- ]quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
7 f- k6 m4 o( e, C% ^6 Nin the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
' X9 r9 N T& U+ Uprice gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
! z$ e2 B" N' K1 Emore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
8 B1 N) j* r, L; _! N+ EQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
8 I1 W& J# w( a8 sLePage Real Estate Services.
5 l* r0 o( q! U6 j' b; Q) o0 R+ E/ @) k$ |+ u
Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
: R- v, j! @9 o" c( vare forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic( [: z/ h$ q1 ^/ u
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
/ A+ c7 u( z) y1 Rsound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the. o; q$ ?- g, @, O4 Y1 x
residential real estate sector.8 G. k; l* u8 P# \7 ~
$ A% \, B" B% c9 ?: ?7 g, X) Q9 q Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation/ z- H) N$ q; l( H
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)0 \3 U' D* E3 r1 a1 Z; \! k
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
8 n7 R; R' _, e' |* U4 v(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
6 e) [) n$ S1 O$ n% Q5 }+ T(+13.2%).
& a$ q; a/ O g
; J- |6 b9 H" c3 G& z: N "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth7 u. }$ R: \, b( a: Z b
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the+ z, j$ j, P( ]) S% X
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are. S7 j3 C5 C2 V7 m# s# y4 X' V2 D
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,6 d. c5 R: W- t2 I; x
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.$ W) K, C" U0 e+ Y6 M* [* U' \9 N9 L: T
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
( U% Q- b# ?: G# g& M5 f/ ~: bwelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
; D# R6 e9 j% T5 y% K7 O: mbalanced market."( d% C1 _3 Z) Q7 G5 |, F. B9 M) _7 l
, h! D- E% U5 h8 x" O- ]. e$ S7 Z$ d Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
) T/ |9 c) B! u9 K' aconsiderable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
( a* s" j8 s r2 @/ D8 k- m, V/ lto balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued* u) \ {% k! j- k" Z5 o
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
Z# ~% |7 E* {" ]9 _, jenergy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
* C4 Y/ \8 M' h3 x" a$ H* \! y! amanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
. }, o& q" g$ e1 Jbreaking price appreciations.
1 C4 [, ~/ |! f, ~% C$ t S& r* t. A5 ]( W9 M
Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding6 [' ]) U# Z$ R$ ]# s- U
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the6 n6 d8 ^1 h2 \2 A0 l2 t
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.4 J1 a! x9 g; c4 F4 g' h
; R. S; k" {1 X( i7 Y: B6 f) [ In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
% J0 {5 ~: n, L4 heconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer" Y, @8 L" e9 M7 c$ q, Q" `. Z0 O
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
; S- `. z9 ]6 L' P; j6 f+ islightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
$ e) g+ r/ Q1 j+ `- rIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
8 V* I* p* j! A7 h+ Q$ r9 ]greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
6 ?0 M8 S! W6 j: P/ W* mprice appreciation when compared with 2005.& E6 ]/ ~) u% q) ?
& y# [8 ~% m. q7 w4 k6 | While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing" P% O" d! ~3 i9 s' d0 O
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and. o- d, b ?2 T* w
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada* D" [ a9 s7 w9 G3 U- e [
are markedly different than those found in the United States.# k" ^, K. s6 f2 Q
8 \; a X% a2 t; g; p# }
Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the+ {; y! [" _) i2 k( Z$ q. Q
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
+ \/ s3 M# N# D' {' F. Pfavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the0 G$ y8 p. Z0 h6 f' n) t1 U2 j
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general6 z8 @4 g" @5 n: G3 @0 A1 b& `
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the. }5 e( T* o2 w* ~" E
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
; R, O* W; k; \% a% Raggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization; ?6 ]6 {" {2 T) @4 N/ K) C
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
0 K& L0 d* R# q6 Q8 ~; I8 _) t# L$ n+ C3 k5 A J6 K6 ~
<<. V1 ~: |' P# ~7 `2 Q# t
REGIONAL SUMMARIES4 x9 _% J4 R x3 T3 H+ h
>>! L; [+ h; Y/ ~- C+ K& o
! n$ R; e2 ]. y; {0 X1 D
Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in' \' W" p# h1 P4 R. ]
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate' ]' Y+ k; D5 e
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
4 `) z4 x C1 Z. \* Dlooking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of8 T) O: B6 @2 e3 O: T/ W# G
renovations.
9 l7 b3 O$ P0 N/ T$ d
/ `9 E9 t) b' r6 K1 M The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
: L$ G, o+ K, f) Hincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation9 m. ]7 L T1 O
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
* a$ |% {9 J# R2 NSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
2 u5 F- a; d" ?2 q5 F
$ ?2 p D( u I The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
- i' |/ S& M6 z: ~4 D0 lslowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
: d8 M- b' U( _& J6 k: ]) b' L9 }quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
1 y; X0 Z* M {' s, X- s600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores# l# c2 k6 @: K+ o2 Z. ]
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
5 {( P2 H8 c$ u4 l- j0 }and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.- S; f, z6 z$ Z3 J4 b9 T9 u. t1 H
5 N0 U$ l5 m" |% ]
In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
6 E6 F" m4 ~9 z5 r3 y: Vconditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their6 e1 }$ h; r# E5 K# _* m
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers1 P) p, ^9 {1 o) `7 ]5 f/ X0 i
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian& f# Y% w- v, f+ l* T6 `9 c
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing6 y {% L9 ^" h# h2 G
buyers with more options when looking for a home.5 `; S5 W. L q7 ~6 ~4 D
7 F: {% @3 P { ?' F0 a Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
]2 H7 ?9 _ }among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
1 O/ @ y2 J5 I2 K, Y7 jpriced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,: j+ D. F, j3 u+ t* h0 L6 j
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
* a+ T9 y8 y0 Vfew years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.8 u2 K8 i% T. u' R u
/ X! G% j- [1 u6 ~1 t5 H: T; ?/ s
Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
3 \; A/ i* t- Y. U5 @- C# Oprices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory7 B. t* `& O3 A: U/ H
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting7 z/ u+ o" V8 _" z' o$ U
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
! M+ ?" _. M# z9 ]. M6 _when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the! T% v! A( j# |/ m6 j
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before* m( M% ` I! L- w4 l$ S- r7 w
making a purchase.
& [9 s" K' o4 M; z+ w. z% ^$ q& i. n) q8 W2 t
Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing" Q; L; N. `/ J
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong r* B0 n* W$ V9 [8 M
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city* O8 Y+ v) Y6 R" t+ q: l$ M
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting; n- _4 t5 @# o6 E0 ^
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
# N" _. E3 W3 v4 namenities.
- ?" X$ g# v- f5 V: U- M3 e. n- _& Q( g0 V! g
The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels. {2 Q& g; l/ N
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
) A8 Z. t. Q) d. n8 _8 wacross the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
+ }5 f& i6 O0 Mcontinued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been( g4 I9 ]3 b/ V+ e$ t& p
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
" G7 s4 r( p+ w0 ~. hresidence, rather than for investment.2 J" L) q) n( c% `4 m- L* ]
2 J8 g1 S5 r u
The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as/ \8 [8 O n6 V5 m
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
8 u6 Z' c* v0 f* Q5 H6 T# tin a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
5 T O, L" F8 Econfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization1 O, r9 b2 Q' f: y2 I/ U
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
4 ^, R6 Q5 _) [8 W$ t+ ^9 }the market.
" H3 x& @; l# y1 q6 |" d
1 C3 l% X1 Y6 b& w In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
* l2 a8 t" o# e/ I/ l& OJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
6 _& P7 u+ X( V I0 AAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring* A% p4 t9 W+ |& @0 w' [* H
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due: x* [4 y5 a8 v
to the shortage of available inventory.
( c Y) r# y' Y) z1 h7 ^3 v8 s/ C3 S( A
Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
3 E2 @* U. G) M6 x. F& xmomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
1 `+ x2 s3 A: ?3 g, dvibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses2 e5 B: t( ~$ L0 r5 {/ [
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.: v; d) v1 y: m& \: p5 ?2 T$ y7 x. B
, X# B" ?1 R6 C5 G1 _" e5 T, S, Q+ e
Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
. ]) `. @# p; W" f* Ain the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
: @: f# [7 o. w: G( Zunemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
2 h% `# r; s- k3 z% upressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring- G) h0 }1 n) ?2 `' A' |9 I
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer: C' z) u0 Q( Q6 W
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as* [3 e) v. l# j6 ^4 m/ C0 V
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
) @: D$ x" P- s0 r1 c4 W% z
, X" R5 e8 N/ J7 X8 B Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter6 i: U- X0 L/ U& \
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
3 }9 v v. ?% l$ ~remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
; h* H9 i; v: G. i4 D+ v- O" Tmaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
: a$ X6 M6 ^+ i! `0 J/ y eincreasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve/ W+ b# S+ Q V) P
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
2 D: S/ f0 N9 G3 _2 q& J. z. o8 V& itowards the end of 2006. / ^6 k3 a5 b1 ?' c4 e; ~( `
+ ^8 p, e2 H' p6 w! F; i
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of8 Z3 j# {$ q% [' H5 s6 ?4 A
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable: v3 t5 a4 N7 G. }0 e$ k/ g
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
. x3 J) V. A Q1 X# L2 N# y @group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
1 a. {- g8 k# Z6 R: A* m/ l5 K& L: xforeign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
# z4 C$ y- ^" n) k. ypressure on tight inventory levels.+ z- Y- m$ Y# c
* T, `$ \9 j* B8 b
Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic/ z; h0 |" J/ U9 _' c7 A
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people, ^1 f$ N" V9 v& I8 n; B+ n! }
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;% u/ l- K* ]! P
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching( j9 p4 S2 y- K$ H" s
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
& x: d) d$ m1 o1 \, P& Y. M1 p# \/ Y( j5 E; l; y
<<
' a) Q; w" f @0 o' Q Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006 u$ O' s; J4 c0 _0 a/ m
) G6 G* H$ H& R* t! y, C/ N2 Y- Q -------------------------------------------------------------------------2 c! z% D8 g. p! \; C& A$ S# _
Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey) Z4 n8 F$ M; v D" H
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 Q% ^* v- O9 ?) R& \ 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3( r4 Z- G3 g) e. i$ j% [2 G/ J o
Market Average Average % Change Average Average% w c' p6 T- A+ C
-------------------------------------------------------------------------- B' `2 t' w( R/ b- {. Y
Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000
& T6 ?) b/ O& V; ?7 A. M -------------------------------------------------------------------------
7 O( k$ m0 K2 ]/ b) G+ i; E! \ Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000. _ k) D3 H0 i5 B6 q7 L
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 w% i) `7 K3 {1 E Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000. S5 D( U8 y6 }; y7 r1 v' t
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
: ?8 Y: X8 J% ^: h Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -
* D7 O" @7 N) w- u+ V" E: ]+ | -------------------------------------------------------------------------
! J+ T4 @" n1 B0 T7 N( P6 B St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333
: i( E0 k9 h* Y2 j0 }7 I, a -------------------------------------------------------------------------! k" \- R% Q# v3 Q0 H
Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583
$ o, y6 n7 E( y% e2 H -------------------------------------------------------------------------9 g) Z5 Q" |2 R4 I2 T: \; y
Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,1850 h7 \0 E8 u, d; v( E: r
-------------------------------------------------------------------------6 f% d) D! ^6 o# j7 L
Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250
4 s0 a! j3 v. i: K2 b$ N -------------------------------------------------------------------------
: l& v( P$ u6 ^ ?3 @* \ Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766
" P" v R5 s( G# V -------------------------------------------------------------------------9 W" A+ c: A' B( W
Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,7076 _9 L1 c# k# j8 W% w* e; b
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ v/ N7 C/ W9 j* U- Y0 q! I Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500
4 ~0 X6 n! x" @2 d2 n -------------------------------------------------------------------------
. t& h2 k2 x5 U3 D$ B Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389* M2 X5 U @. s
-------------------------------------------------------------------------2 r. g( O+ Q5 y
Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714
# y% V& {; _, k5 D -------------------------------------------------------------------------
U9 z) D7 b' X/ t p Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500* z6 l; ?3 [4 c9 k' r; L2 s; \
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
8 }6 y1 A1 {- z/ _; x0 T Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000
) ~% x3 C- i: z3 H. I -------------------------------------------------------------------------
7 d( G2 f0 I' [) T, @/ @: z: y National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860
3 h( e# [ N; I# T -------------------------------------------------------------------------' a3 ` c6 |. e+ V
2 a9 U1 k* r5 [! u& C& f: f+ f -------------------------------------------------------------
4 b# h$ u& T: g2 G @ Standard Condominium
! F4 p. c1 p o+ @ ]1 S -------------------------------------------------------------
2 j+ I v0 f. \ 2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo: o* d' j5 A9 y
Market % Change Average Average % Change; m4 Q( u# J' U8 n: H: n
-------------------------------------------------------------0 Z" E! |7 J# ~; u4 H
Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%
2 U/ \. I+ C! W9 P! N9 o3 l -------------------------------------------------------------; j2 `! F1 @" e" @+ D% H+ V
Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%
" o. a/ I% E/ z; D' L: P1 k -------------------------------------------------------------, k J1 E( _9 @! E8 C6 w; E
Moncton 4.9% - - N/A/ P/ k8 R9 n9 V3 q2 W
-------------------------------------------------------------
* q. l% s0 C$ a8 u Saint John N/A - - N/A m; [! Y& {$ E
-------------------------------------------------------------
. K" z' o; P% }3 M1 v8 b St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%! Y Y2 }/ \# W$ k( i' y
-------------------------------------------------------------
' r$ p" `- y7 B Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%
/ p" O8 K: K7 E -------------------------------------------------------------
/ i+ R5 z+ @7 }! U9 h: Z5 Q6 S# A Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%
# t- ?- ?9 |, P- B8 @4 O5 J -------------------------------------------------------------
" r" p- G' @! m! N. M Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%
; h0 ^, m1 R5 E0 s& b* r O -------------------------------------------------------------, W" _' z1 L: M/ k, y% N
Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%- ?! E2 F, [' c( E: m4 j
-------------------------------------------------------------
% `, G2 m0 h8 H0 ^) m1 n# C! T+ s& h Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%
" `* ~* J1 y4 [$ L' v; J. B -------------------------------------------------------------
4 b* }4 O' I* l) j+ s* j Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%
" ^* A. V% F* d4 E5 b" w -------------------------------------------------------------# H; m& a( V/ A, _* `9 d
Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%
8 K. }4 k7 d' W -------------------------------------------------------------4 L5 h4 n$ \7 Y8 K# |
Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%
6 o7 U- N. N$ b -------------------------------------------------------------; F: @6 `3 N9 e/ U$ m
Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%
* c4 [ |# K' D* [ -------------------------------------------------------------
0 A/ r% N& O! T5 \* P7 C, `" A' X Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%
4 @4 D& q+ _" C5 M& _, x& Z' ?4 O -------------------------------------------------------------1 \+ O3 A5 C Z9 V- ]; z
National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%
( ?/ } U; J# c3 Y -------------------------------------------------------------
% P2 F1 e- M1 }9 N >>, d! z* ^. T/ Y% z0 d( }) y
d5 a; Q1 @! Q; X9 O, z
Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
; M- v- R' z1 N+ }& s" Nin the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
/ u& F. m8 U" eJohn and Victoria.
% K5 A4 I& w) V( u; M1 B% W( z5 W$ x# h6 }" H6 G' X& j
The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most$ O1 p9 B$ K) ?! L2 \
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of. H, a: _( P, H o6 g- q& z4 {; T
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release: q. O" m% w( H# r& j$ U
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
) Q) H/ Z Z, ^6 M, P( }" L- f+ L) dtrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
! f! \# U6 |# e" F- |! I$ s: eacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is* a% ~& w4 E5 Q$ D
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
j1 `' C2 k- Q- O$ H# Q& U, `5 hfigures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
0 a# V; x9 v* v' G6 A: Zversion of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
) s# N. M5 C3 M7 v1 I: R1 l" _0 V: qNovember 15, 2006.
: Q/ s8 S2 E; u2 W, _1 n Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
+ ]* n4 @8 S% t0 W% Q* ^fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
* j9 X9 o; t: e% g" t$ jprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is8 }' j- l" t3 L% h3 j3 ~; S
available for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|