 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable 1 {& E$ M- o2 ~5 D& g1 `9 Y' S H
7 A; u' b! L. i% a9 ^8 T6 H- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -# J2 f% P: n" T* k& E A
9 F8 }/ S6 w/ x
TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
5 c* [. s- e3 I/ V5 r- m6 ]. i4 ]exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
% f" r+ T1 k! [+ x6 }+ s! ?quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
0 {. n+ o N# u7 t* S1 jin the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
5 Z+ u2 k' L0 Y4 e, K( aprice gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
B" |+ J- d+ E6 Jmore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,. b" p& U" [' H, k) g8 L1 \0 M
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
, ~. O6 H# e, NLePage Real Estate Services.
( c" }% Y: w$ R" ]( R7 Z* F6 n3 ^% U& r' ~5 S" n
Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters/ L4 p4 p: [ o) a
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic0 K) Z/ K0 G! |3 ]+ d
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
5 j5 [: Q7 J; \& R( \+ [# Csound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
9 K2 W/ Z, ?' ?- c: ]2 \residential real estate sector.0 e `& J! k0 p) _' z2 W, j6 o% Q
( J* y1 Y; Q z- a g% w Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation* _" M" _. Y, ]: U3 W
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)) b" s' ~% R: m) }$ \
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
9 ?* f( R5 n! O/ ?(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,3804 _9 Q K D: E0 g
(+13.2%).
# i. y! n, i0 `# ^) |: s
: d8 p. Z7 u; z* h6 E+ ]6 V6 e, B "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
9 l! g. J7 b* nduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the- {8 V1 o6 W) a& E5 X& ]
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
3 u, s; h; I* w$ z3 M3 Dpoised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
# c- C0 ]7 t* ipresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.- K9 j) j) n0 W& i w
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
' R, O4 l6 @& S- O8 U8 ewelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy% N% Q5 B- s( y. S8 g$ y$ m
balanced market."
4 K# ~, S: K8 S! b, L0 X* q" J; ]- }" W" @
Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,& x8 [% d1 f0 j( y8 ~/ E9 F
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
* j+ R2 Z, i K( T+ Q3 rto balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
7 f& A- `! g* w5 a5 u( kthroughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
# Y, P! A0 x i, K0 Y7 E# s( u" c% Henergy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
) g6 y6 t! |) p% M8 `" Ymanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
" ~* V# o0 a8 K9 n; O- K* Hbreaking price appreciations.; M' i. l( v) \& \9 D+ X
: [" Y) p7 Q% n( ^ Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
6 H6 L4 w8 G" p4 g# p5 |economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the0 X1 h6 q d! P: _
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.8 k, W v2 c5 Z9 H0 S7 W' P% }
7 k9 c" W z" a+ Q; d x% k$ n T In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
% M2 d/ ~) J- B! a( G8 g8 p' |6 weconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
4 H1 r4 @( q6 S! `confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off9 p, \$ q# y7 e3 r. _8 |
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
' C i0 Z" F" O3 u6 RIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
, N {8 i6 L! U# ^# u7 Ogreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of, W8 B5 i* `: Q t% g' ~
price appreciation when compared with 2005.
1 q7 k& O* B$ |2 u3 k" c
1 `1 ~* D" U a, c While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing' C8 S& s+ m8 I
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
: c6 K# M: R% S& H1 {: O+ V; e0 cfinancial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
! w. t% O, X l$ L; [/ gare markedly different than those found in the United States.
& X2 T. v' @/ d! A0 A& k6 {
! ^* V) q# Z9 ^7 M Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
6 E( s; y$ r* @American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
& k* c7 m q0 M. ?5 Hfavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the$ e6 N% U4 D# H/ I( D( B
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general( l" k: S; f: {: h7 a1 a
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
: I7 K5 G5 |" ?3 ~downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and# W( A; c! V! p1 I2 w ^
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
9 {2 E$ S4 N9 }1 c; F" _mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
5 [/ y5 o. `. P2 b2 Q7 b
( g# z6 t- f8 L% j: c- C <<
4 D! Q% P$ ~. a p& z2 z REGIONAL SUMMARIES
& a( U6 Q$ X) Z7 N) e >>
( z0 t) E* [7 F! d7 h4 ?; }5 [( W
) s, Z! @- i( l; l0 i9 u& P9 q Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
/ h3 Y5 }" a: J: C5 f Y- N% ~6 m7 V1 IHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
1 Y) \8 i" K5 c' B* [; pof price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
8 n* k. \8 v* ?) p6 I$ Q: E" j! wlooking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of f4 i3 Q2 G: H: F( j
renovations.
$ ?5 S; Z: ?8 }% f' C7 r6 @3 S2 b
& Z$ s/ b! j+ h6 F- p5 Q; H The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight5 D5 s [# v: F
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation x7 A. D7 V# t9 S% f- N
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
$ P; f) Y' X- H/ \& ], HSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.; G/ m, M; r0 Q' P7 v1 {* d M. ?9 a9 b: i
4 L5 b, A' [$ `9 k( s1 a# @ p; M( F The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
' Q% z% B: r, M9 P) L/ }5 }slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
* \6 F' ?# w7 b! p9 Iquarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new( J5 W! q" n* u! Q; W) D! ?! ^8 @
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores' |3 B3 m1 d5 Y6 _+ I6 _; a
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
- l2 L0 b9 C. W; Q: }, {and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
2 a5 b/ r( d. ~# H- N
0 s- w; N8 T$ S1 r, | In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced6 g9 O% ~& ~# N) a5 b0 w# j- P
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
4 W: f; T$ r6 x6 J& s# f& yhomes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers2 O# Y- `5 k+ Z
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
! z: d$ G3 _9 T# O! V8 d) C" s6 E4 Tdollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing3 E: f% e5 {6 L: j( P
buyers with more options when looking for a home.; b: r; {, m- L: N: y( s0 y
( k$ j3 i" M, m
Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly5 u' W& {% Q) A d, P+ `+ M
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
, X) N$ ?2 A) Z( S1 Q0 @priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,; i6 c4 q3 G8 H+ P$ c" w
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
" A, s) q: ?* x2 Vfew years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
7 u- }* ?5 w, R$ O! R" r
3 d0 h0 x$ p' J) `: j: E( y0 _# h' | Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house0 L, n" F0 i" w" V) S% `: n# A1 z! ~
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory: ^( |; b: g& N4 n3 a& F
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting4 @9 O" f# U* z" G% x- v+ }/ t7 s, g' y
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,) F4 p; M2 W5 }) f/ n d
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
; ~) T: e( F3 H0 npressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
( O7 _% S; J7 C4 o7 imaking a purchase.+ T! e, b" ^: L! H2 Y; L% B
3 }7 ~% R- ~: Q& J
Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing4 \6 r3 I6 x. C4 l0 \( D5 R" ?
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong+ T5 c Y# i8 g3 O7 b/ [/ i8 L
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city3 J- ]0 s; r2 m
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting. f* n. p/ k' U [: r7 r" S# O
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown! v3 p5 Z0 e0 W" ^2 T* L
amenities.
" W, s- A) U- H: X
; {* A0 y$ e. l' ~! k1 W The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels9 _2 o. u* @4 f: V9 M/ h t
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand8 t% Z7 L' d/ T/ u2 |3 ?
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has. n! m$ y* Q3 `" T; o
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been9 J* J+ [+ S& U2 p2 k/ k
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle% u5 v% Q, V; @
residence, rather than for investment.
1 Z3 B3 P1 @+ i/ l
( B! v9 U8 B3 ?! N8 R, N5 Y: I The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as: V( Y% b r, ^- Z0 c4 T
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted5 M7 T+ k, b- _# m$ d5 a
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer" q! b$ W3 L) o* ^6 t' M5 l
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
/ y: i8 N% r* H, l3 r* |rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
% S2 _6 ~4 I1 |4 x2 ythe market.
0 v: g0 y- b8 G/ K$ t
# g: Y4 a+ H% _ In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
& e" y% S9 {' W! U! ^July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In8 z! {0 k; f2 @! Q+ K
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
( E; G& Q, C8 K6 z4 u+ ?/ xmonths, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due o6 W/ i+ ^& T( }3 H7 I( i
to the shortage of available inventory.: p/ |! s5 B+ B6 j
+ W9 ~6 x4 I0 x4 o" f* `6 i. V/ R% s Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
. a8 f: c% x. c1 g1 dmomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains$ x3 v7 H& L8 Q
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
+ N0 w+ H, |: I5 l" D/ Ystruggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
: Q0 X. }4 f/ Y
, s" ?+ j7 G9 G1 d4 ~! _ Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
; T$ _3 Q& ~. C/ ?in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
$ G6 F: y4 d" p2 K7 j) v' _unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
" j2 Y3 I) N& C3 o: Vpressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
; u: ?7 U% N+ Tprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer. d" g4 D3 d, Z" l3 B: w3 H
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as) ]2 s/ ]( D- J4 g$ W1 ?( b! A
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
' s, h' {. T" \, _+ g: E
( n, ^' s& q5 M/ u) Q Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter. q7 x, m8 X! T0 k0 t3 s" `- _/ R$ P
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton6 l- [1 H# {9 H( r
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
- M2 ]% V, e$ I: Cmaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
( S! k+ J7 j8 e$ ?increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
; l2 a% r3 T1 _, z2 ^in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly9 u: g4 t9 S2 \% g. [6 |
towards the end of 2006.
! E, V9 X9 |- I: b- j
. i% q9 R6 D( Z. fWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
/ ?2 i! Y& d5 g5 i- c Qinventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
3 ?& {( U8 {7 g2 Xto meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
; @1 f% n* k- I7 bgroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to9 k+ D9 @. U1 e! L9 @9 o
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
4 @) S! M6 D3 l. t$ g: }pressure on tight inventory levels.
- v0 c$ ~5 `# q E6 k8 o8 @' O8 F5 e" T! B' n% U
Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic1 k0 k3 m3 H* x: T/ O
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people" y/ L2 I8 @% N; M% d7 g! }& X
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;9 R4 ]: h/ e6 u; ^4 ^9 j
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
8 r% q2 @: X6 [* J" e$ X+ ^for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.3 R5 n8 O7 C( {, v; n
& n7 A% m/ V/ u% f- Z
<<3 `, N) I) Q5 `! Y* g& _
Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006% j& B+ [" o1 x, e7 `" }9 @
; @* P2 g7 [9 }% y+ B+ G( S
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
/ z4 y) \/ T# H: y, ? Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey
3 P( ^% i0 X, f0 e# T" ]7 C/ |) L -------------------------------------------------------------------------
/ w1 O* W' |" C7 z1 }' V1 k 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3
. M3 D' E; l7 c& y; \. ^9 | Market Average Average % Change Average Average) M3 E. e3 Q! E8 h9 Y+ U: V$ O: C6 E
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
) `! H" p4 ^- {- O v1 K Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000
3 N4 k2 T& ?7 d! Y# k* E -------------------------------------------------------------------------
: C5 j( [" e4 @ Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000 i/ M$ X3 z6 ?& N8 d5 B
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
5 v8 ]; p8 x/ P8 Q$ Q( w1 ` Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,0007 E2 q% x% V& h( l4 {
-------------------------------------------------------------------------( u+ W( m, \7 ^ \6 @1 L
Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -
$ [7 c3 |* h0 q/ D -------------------------------------------------------------------------
, |' v1 V; J: J7 }2 N St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333
/ Q1 S4 D7 U7 i# b, A& c, A -------------------------------------------------------------------------
! @+ J: z; L- q& V# R/ b4 ^ Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583
! ?! }4 k, z7 f! g% ? -------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 V' \! {& \. A+ {+ ]6 h! t) J* R Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185
8 j& T" x+ j& X, C -------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 Y" {- c( }2 i Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250) L( V+ J+ P5 F+ D F
------------------------------------------------------------------------- x. P* g' u! `9 }3 d; W% ^4 S
Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,7663 w* q+ P" N, _% b( ^
-------------------------------------------------------------------------3 \% H$ V" c2 k) L
Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707 o. z3 J2 W( `& {1 {1 A3 |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
; z! i! N, a$ T' |5 I: F Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500
+ S x8 G3 u9 [6 w -------------------------------------------------------------------------1 E# C- \/ o1 n) [
Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389 f/ S3 i( k0 G
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
{2 c! b0 X# \, L% I7 g Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714
4 Z e" Q2 U1 ]$ N* S& d* H1 g* t! i -------------------------------------------------------------------------
7 w/ W, R- b3 p1 }4 ?- Q8 G Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500
# Q G) b5 k0 h( V j -------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 U1 s: V8 }& l& S Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,0002 L: f0 t5 [1 i
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
N! x* U! u. @( ~, a National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860
+ ^" e! w( N \ -------------------------------------------------------------------------2 h5 Q) Q( Q; H7 t- ^2 P. v
/ \/ |9 @+ i6 t1 f
-------------------------------------------------------------7 F4 Q% t$ U: T. z; z8 o
Standard Condominium
( s |# B5 R _6 ~ -------------------------------------------------------------
' }5 O: q& @* [% v% ^ 2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo
6 Y% R. C8 Y% k Market % Change Average Average % Change
: X( {, T6 I( a# ]/ c6 y3 A4 V1 S -------------------------------------------------------------
/ e0 _' ?4 a9 Q' z& a7 v Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9% w2 L8 j- _7 h. K n* l/ V
-------------------------------------------------------------
( U% u2 Y% ? o1 I Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0% {. H5 m% B8 O
-------------------------------------------------------------' z$ d; x6 W& w: j
Moncton 4.9% - - N/A
2 Y7 s# e& q- i% H -------------------------------------------------------------
$ Q, j: e2 \. a% h; M9 T Saint John N/A - - N/A; o( y, U6 \4 F
-------------------------------------------------------------. j" ^. W2 {4 `2 f+ ?( I' ]
St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%5 E. t- h6 V V$ D# c; {
-------------------------------------------------------------, P$ G& }8 u9 q
Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%6 _0 @$ y. l# f9 u
-------------------------------------------------------------
0 T+ ?+ n- \/ ?- _0 v1 T% M& ~ Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%9 y! h) v0 u: b1 {$ K3 d- |3 t
-------------------------------------------------------------
9 n% Q! S T+ U2 F2 f, ? Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%
& j/ u0 q# Q3 r7 p, Y -------------------------------------------------------------
# B5 g! i N, i! |1 G Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%
0 G3 ]/ @3 d. S% h% @$ o -------------------------------------------------------------. s$ v9 g% `2 g1 O+ Q7 `
Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%+ o. g' I/ C, p: ]
-------------------------------------------------------------
! B- d! W6 s' u9 n. { Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%
% l9 ^/ S4 ?+ C& P4 A8 v6 ] -------------------------------------------------------------
/ F" K3 y4 S6 W3 l Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%
3 }- W% |" P& e: C4 G3 p) k -------------------------------------------------------------" x7 P2 t9 k; M
Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%. a! J5 U( i3 ]
-------------------------------------------------------------
1 e7 x7 Y5 e, R Z* M( r4 Q! y) a6 K Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%9 S8 a8 g8 J- _
-------------------------------------------------------------
, m- H) y3 e) ] Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%. T; J- W* ~4 o* y8 _
-------------------------------------------------------------3 n8 B# n; c. |0 W! b; p! `. j
National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%7 D- N" m" s1 }! |% O$ E' z# \. ^
-------------------------------------------------------------
j+ g9 m8 y( o2 u& R7 z9 j# `4 C >>
+ S3 I1 O, g& s5 L$ c6 c+ S8 z" {% O% d$ ]. f; ~/ ? _7 y
Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined1 e$ T c8 D- v& Y5 G; g
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
4 f, N% t. v! o. r, p" IJohn and Victoria.
6 S; V& y! Z v; F: B! s8 E& V e+ c2 m1 Z, D9 E+ u
The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most# e/ k+ i$ z+ A5 u$ _6 j5 y. U0 W$ |
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of$ B) Y! K$ i" x# N) c
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
' J% W5 [1 f9 x' e! B+ E6 }8 `references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
$ \. Q# z# i( O* Z- U0 t8 ltrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
- N. P% M, B5 \* n1 o3 m! w+ P0 eacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is* K* @4 e, n0 w& c
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current s: L& d4 Y w( U; R0 Z" |0 O! T7 X: X( g
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable) p3 S& V8 [) m, f& p6 O( B
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
8 g+ U6 }1 o) o- h) q5 wNovember 15, 2006.
- N+ ?3 d# n# R# W Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
) ~; T1 o& k6 U, j( Wfair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
4 b) ^3 _: M8 T3 M# @( z9 Lprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is0 g& U" O. o) @* F, E. k
available for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|