 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
; Z2 }7 G) Y% s* k' X& L1 Z
% w `( J7 j# u5 Y" b- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -5 v7 v4 H2 m w/ g P# {
: ?/ G2 F* S2 p) D$ m3 ^, p TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
' a2 [7 m' J! P6 v3 g/ ]exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third5 e5 |/ }7 K8 L. u! V4 {
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
& W, S& `# z+ A1 rin the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit6 l* T; N1 T/ T1 s- ?7 E: _4 I6 P% J
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
; C: u5 M( P. w: \more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,! C8 ]3 a" X/ x
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal9 b( ?8 G& y5 j3 Z* F
LePage Real Estate Services., \" V2 A5 C: P: C$ s. I; h
6 s9 m" Z: H* R$ Z% F Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
6 \& ]. a4 P/ Y& |; ^, y8 Rare forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic" r% J9 ^& c8 z' n
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
( ^3 X: b# q4 jsound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the; [/ P6 W D+ Y3 a: y) ]8 h( F6 V8 `
residential real estate sector.
2 L& Z! g; n1 J6 S( S( P
4 a6 C, f/ }$ V" w6 m; Z, X/ D Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
: c* I0 K! j# U$ s; B( Doccurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
% z# `1 `2 f# {year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562, `7 ^8 ]+ w% g O% K- w, J5 p
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
, J7 y0 V2 U6 S. u7 ]9 q' Q2 G(+13.2%).
; ^2 g$ q; n, ?4 h' b/ y( G) l: X& l
; Z( s6 d- \3 ~) P# ^ "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth# g3 ^- B& y. H% \
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
8 z7 O u! i3 A w6 j8 w ]. U- kfrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
# r2 d1 `6 U- ~poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
6 u: N& c1 `/ j8 c9 t: Lpresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
8 o: X3 ]3 K/ S; C3 w"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
' l6 q: o5 Z' m- E% nwelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
* N0 k' q! k L% _2 e& wbalanced market."+ r/ e& t' A( o+ V$ u
, U* N, X; n( h5 D
Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,# x3 t; e% ^. e# L
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
3 G! H6 U- N8 @1 v3 W6 X' h gto balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued! M% @ J9 h9 U$ A& ~
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core& Y. v( S. x2 R/ v0 O
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,- }* z; j8 S! u& u/ I
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record2 Q8 x0 a: @7 o8 S2 _
breaking price appreciations.
+ f) E. M5 v7 q0 q
+ u) \+ `' w$ ^6 G$ |) I+ x Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding! ^1 A5 u7 g! `4 R
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the: \6 K- e p) n/ p2 L7 x/ r
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
, V. o" u" l; W
1 U$ S1 d9 ]) v5 G/ p In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
. e* L# e; B1 m1 d# M3 @economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer* A a4 u- I! s% G" T; W
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off4 n, s ]9 S7 F( M. @
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.7 ^: M1 K I: G) x7 J* p# \5 A
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers0 y! k* B' w5 F- t
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of2 ^+ m0 u) m7 @
price appreciation when compared with 2005.' X6 X8 u l8 e0 Q B
4 s0 {0 I8 N* c% ~
While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing# C% Z! k: {4 F% l+ J$ V
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and* R' T% P4 ~$ k- r# x$ g
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
0 { B! X% y0 s9 d' T; `2 mare markedly different than those found in the United States.! b9 L9 c5 F! Z* E0 n, y
5 B2 `; E3 y# {$ Q2 j* d- L$ [& u Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
# N( E! t& p1 h d1 y: lAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
$ e; u' M4 ~6 C, Rfavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
# a6 U7 P) L+ Z% j! D- Mrelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general4 a8 P8 v3 t3 i
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
) I3 s/ Y* `* V3 Cdownside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
1 A9 F G0 }: x- W% baggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
, I/ A* @& x8 ^3 w( x! n6 smortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
9 B, X! V5 o2 V- Q: j7 e. Z+ |2 U; y4 o+ F. K
<<4 L9 w5 ~% N! D0 r) s" T
REGIONAL SUMMARIES
. T& Z3 M- q3 n( e >>* |7 U6 Q; j8 ]
1 e$ g1 v* ?- S
Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in2 u( e; p: t% |; o
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
' I! g! _0 h1 sof price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time: [; E6 S9 ]) }" {2 ?
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
7 Y2 M" @+ Y8 g8 Q2 }2 ]: Yrenovations.
4 z9 ]7 m4 q5 Z- r1 { I) G+ A m k5 \7 h
The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight4 y9 N& d) U4 }/ L' w% ?- S
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
1 a8 O b4 C2 R; s+ `6 m( Mcompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and# P6 ]( {+ u- _- K1 N9 {
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.0 [6 u$ n* D0 F! _! \, E
8 G9 x" c2 c3 H( N+ |1 k2 b: k The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
, T. ]( ]& l1 H$ R& K) A2 }' Bslowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
0 b, J0 B% v n6 @( O9 Pquarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
4 Q# O( \5 R& {* Z0 x9 y9 G# n600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
4 Q8 c! M0 ]( a. o* n8 K; n X' s' fto the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
5 @' G- Q! D' \& nand are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
% \5 _# W" w# U* ?) m, b2 g
0 ^! b9 w( X' r In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
4 m4 G4 x- c& ]4 T; g C. hconditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their, Z& \! N; m0 o6 U2 c/ s* l
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
, Q( X9 ]" X6 L. X+ Q+ Q: f3 hwas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
! R/ G0 U; a$ u- \ R. A# Gdollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
: K/ L; Y* ~4 _* dbuyers with more options when looking for a home.
$ ]$ ~+ P; Y+ f; X& s# W- g" D) n
|. D( J1 k7 g" ^9 j/ \ Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
) X( Z0 r+ Z" p( mamong higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes$ H6 s6 N- K( Y J
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,0 S- D; C. o+ c; @2 j1 E% U
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last! a/ M) |4 ]6 @3 A
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
. k% c t5 Q7 A# Y2 D7 p- S* {" i) u
Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
( r; a+ Z% Z* W( `: ?( t' y6 _+ q" }9 ~prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory& u6 M# F s# H; H
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting+ ]9 n3 F6 t+ Y/ _1 T x9 e
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,; I+ m% M% v1 n$ n; c- B6 e
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
* a& I% R+ R N& apressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before4 i) O1 g5 p- S; [
making a purchase.
- }& C0 @* u0 K; O4 C P/ M% l6 P' e/ P( ], S
Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing) L9 ^: W' ]$ _% C& F
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong& D. N# q3 ~$ C1 a/ o8 O3 j6 I
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
! W% e# Z6 L0 W6 T; zcentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
) U/ S, l7 n: `attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
5 y% T9 v. I; d* a0 damenities.
- C! J( |4 r) y# X6 Q4 O" u2 F
1 u- H5 d; J6 S4 k: L The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels( M* d0 M7 h/ D6 F- L9 q
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
* O7 M }' L- C1 Sacross the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has' T& i' C- u- E7 S& n. U' U
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been! u# O6 v. u: ~* B: Z, ?. k
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
% T0 s! P3 y$ G; k: [7 g! B, vresidence, rather than for investment.
5 |4 w9 ~. @% J3 Q7 f8 u. _# s' o
The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
: _" ]4 j; Z; p$ u. |3 G% shouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted8 ~! H5 t5 `6 y" r. G2 z
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
/ ^, S- M" k5 a3 W& Y2 r$ B% qconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
0 f. ]" S: m# _& {rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
* L2 [6 q$ I5 D# T) jthe market.7 r) q" U* O+ Y( p3 K
' |/ F6 ]. o, D; P9 a In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
2 T4 }, `) h: \" |* |6 {July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In! Q/ x3 C3 F1 D
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
& I* c$ E X* v% {$ amonths, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
$ o( s. o3 X, m2 z d$ ^ Gto the shortage of available inventory. r. _* q [2 I2 q- L7 b. m
+ Z! _) s* Z! h1 P+ T+ i) V
Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its( K4 g f( V# F# }! w0 A6 G: t
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
& F9 w) p/ x! p3 X, c* S9 A4 lvibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
5 l6 B" W/ _! c$ W8 I" V% l( vstruggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
2 Y' r& W% |( m0 x/ t0 t" J0 n1 Z; H! w4 ]$ }7 i0 g1 h6 q
Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases7 p+ ?& G& q- T0 f+ @
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
, u# Y( [2 [: Z: A( E9 Z' Gunemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
% z/ i# n( g- ^% _! |) ^* tpressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
, B) \, {6 ~, f1 i( B' S9 Eprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
4 |9 {0 V+ I2 z* s' Q$ `6 ?& wseason - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as- ^7 u0 _1 f* W
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
3 u! T* O& N# O$ j5 X
- f i; N) H- t% W) A# S8 w n0 s Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter0 L( z6 h' b% K4 l8 Y
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton/ H9 p8 F0 j& p5 Y/ a
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,6 w3 C3 H' L) O/ ^" B
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
; z: {) G9 h Yincreasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve9 q x2 y; `- {3 ?- y5 Y
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
2 g& n4 T$ g4 S% ptowards the end of 2006. # X& t3 G- {: u, v' I
! ~8 W; M* [5 ]
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of) I' [; L1 n/ h
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable6 I- V& C; R1 q
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
`- j/ c3 X% x; r4 Zgroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to4 C- i- }+ ~/ V& w4 b$ c% D
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
& b% E F: B g9 O& n4 M6 Bpressure on tight inventory levels.% j7 b" r( U" d. E7 F
( e; `5 ]" U3 J5 X# F0 e9 `
Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
7 f6 g6 _4 o( X1 H5 [) gfundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
. _8 d% @6 B9 S8 ginto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
5 d Y) ~; X( e$ n, k/ ]while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching+ x' e; F% K- _/ b0 \8 L
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
; [$ n0 N" V# g, M
5 Y3 F) W$ P; i& j$ X) n <<5 M6 ~7 ?' T9 j; J, T4 T& B4 T
Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006; y( h# ^$ x" N5 S; j, V
% s) d: w- A! `1 q -------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ |/ q6 f( ]" v0 ?5 W Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey& x# t9 y4 v1 U
-------------------------------------------------------------------------$ A3 }! \6 \+ j' c" r, S/ t
2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3
" ]+ i+ Y0 p. e- T' T& m Market Average Average % Change Average Average+ n* X. F9 y# o+ ^% g
-------------------------------------------------------------------------, i4 a6 Y, ?7 `, @- p0 f2 S! ?
Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,0008 m; }9 {- f; m, G6 D2 b
-------------------------------------------------------------------------. `! l3 J; o7 t: N; x' h" h
Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000
5 h S) W% [) q -------------------------------------------------------------------------0 k# r$ f! p E% p2 K1 k
Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,0000 F |1 h$ r" i, ~5 J0 H* P
-------------------------------------------------------------------------: Y) G" ?* h, _0 P
Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -: m# b: A7 I% G9 l @) x; s
-------------------------------------------------------------------------9 g2 C# b K: z+ _1 E
St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333
( q- s! k G/ k3 `4 X+ i -------------------------------------------------------------------------8 ^1 M3 U0 @9 A; S8 k
Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583# T! p) A/ e) J
------------------------------------------------------------------------- ]: V1 h+ c7 F6 [! N0 E
Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185. P: U+ Z7 r- c: p1 e
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
" Q# a' K# p: R" `% ^" i2 R! R Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,2502 Q2 W) K: O* D- h
------------------------------------------------------------------------- n/ o w l, C: [: \1 j
Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766
& ]3 a# R, N0 Y3 N: M -------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 i" L: y( ?0 X- i Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707& [$ X; D( F5 P, `6 x
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 Q% c9 V0 [4 T2 s+ W1 V: I Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500
# y% y' j: _0 ~- j" d( ?' B& F a: y -------------------------------------------------------------------------# g4 y' P/ g' y5 `- C$ J5 O
Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389
9 r; b3 s- z+ r: L, X0 M -------------------------------------------------------------------------7 |- e, m6 l* p7 O
Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714
& b8 p5 Q' R7 I: S T f$ D -------------------------------------------------------------------------6 V4 G9 G' i, p& F
Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500
E ?6 M9 n* n9 ^+ U7 I -------------------------------------------------------------------------
% n/ K# g8 `! S- k Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000
3 {4 o8 D& x7 x: g7 A -------------------------------------------------------------------------3 m" x1 G) Y# T
National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860
( f" G* l; M$ d# `5 G: z! G ------------------------------------------------------------------------- L; k6 x% J) h: z
* W1 L3 c/ X6 o4 h% O* Y I. | -------------------------------------------------------------
# e+ X, ]0 g. Z' K- V* C Standard Condominium# }+ A4 b. W+ j
-------------------------------------------------------------
/ B! t- \4 w" u0 k: T3 U y0 H- ] 2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo) }' m1 A6 e& n+ p# J! x
Market % Change Average Average % Change
4 ~6 F9 p! L# N' e# p% K0 A/ h- \ -------------------------------------------------------------
. X; I0 [* c: L+ V% d+ l Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%6 ~( e% _, C$ t- w
-------------------------------------------------------------
4 s, p, S' s# B/ u Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%
. H! Q+ ^3 }/ q) `" }8 t ------------------------------------------------------------- e W- d( b7 S [4 I2 p8 X
Moncton 4.9% - - N/A4 }2 ^' j$ |8 G9 K3 `
-------------------------------------------------------------- l/ ^' [! G' f0 W9 D1 t& E4 a
Saint John N/A - - N/A
$ g ] Q! T/ c; i$ w3 s/ x -------------------------------------------------------------
2 L/ U: m% ^% `( Z St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%
8 T, J \' w O/ U4 v4 x% [ -------------------------------------------------------------* D" E6 h6 e+ u y9 A( t% K7 l
Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%2 {( g8 o' L) z' m6 ?) l
-------------------------------------------------------------0 a" a5 n2 c. d3 h" c, k. X( L9 r
Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%
' N$ B' V5 @, K ]+ h -------------------------------------------------------------
G( R" r0 M8 Z) _! S; h, ^5 E Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%
# D) d5 }& t+ ^! N. J% {7 w -------------------------------------------------------------) U6 s, V# X& R3 ^6 |0 ]
Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%1 I/ \4 [) G2 c$ N0 H+ X7 Q
-------------------------------------------------------------/ X: z* k L3 z$ n9 y* w* _
Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%" J0 O) V5 w0 S; K5 t
-------------------------------------------------------------6 r u! w+ B0 a2 k$ n- ]
Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%# w6 f4 Y3 h3 G! q5 H
-------------------------------------------------------------3 @2 K \' H0 _2 B
Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%/ i8 U( n2 ]2 V! R. H* y
-------------------------------------------------------------
5 T- i, O. L _3 H4 |! w. t) v# G6 I6 M Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%
1 @ F9 W+ D! j* x8 M# C -------------------------------------------------------------2 |, ?" S: u% j% Z2 w
Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%
! _1 V' t! O0 r! j# H- y& f -------------------------------------------------------------. Z6 N. f$ R4 n0 Z; D) D
Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%
9 K P2 h6 L8 y: ~ -------------------------------------------------------------, C B! o. y J Y0 @ _
National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%7 [4 ]8 N# [# n. ?1 `& j# s/ B
-------------------------------------------------------------# r4 h W2 J7 u( x3 y- w" V% c
>>
' E z4 ~2 J7 t" S1 q" S6 O( n
. r% w& |! @/ ?6 n3 g* I9 I! u( { Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
* G& x& e0 U5 n8 a; gin the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint* y' I: h9 J) R8 E1 X. c ^
John and Victoria.
" R0 H6 r+ z! Y |9 z: B6 e6 l3 f, d! `* _4 u
The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
0 s w0 t- ~6 ~8 _comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of$ c' ^3 V7 S: a/ C6 d( E
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
/ |* q. Y p- `7 Ereferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
0 A W0 a+ I. F1 K9 J8 M1 otrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
6 p9 m' \. M7 S" x H4 Y; Oacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is) _* b9 M8 m* s0 e
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
* W. u, j6 l! R2 B7 k2 L! Rfigures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable9 k$ E7 u- Z$ b) I( }
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
4 [5 H0 S/ W) ]/ p" e5 ANovember 15, 2006.% n! [" h4 i, g/ M! z9 W5 w
Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
( X" W3 m( d T/ n }( N+ D! Yfair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
, X* k. N1 E& B" Dprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
) i4 g( A% k" f: f0 z" N, Xavailable for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|