 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
2 q d+ r- I1 C: L- ~! P7 j0 D8 g7 |/ T( X2 H6 ~
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -1 U E3 X5 G- ?: _1 [
8 ?5 ~' y7 q* a5 A6 t TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market$ I ~. Q' y$ ? U- D& D
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third* r Q( z! M8 m( g/ j# O
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic, C0 V. G) X1 ~% ^& m
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
: m* n6 U0 U& x0 eprice gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
- `- [( `* o* gmore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,% v6 I. d% A, C3 w
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
8 z" @) Q O; U8 N+ oLePage Real Estate Services. [% q8 ~/ F' T+ g/ @; h
* f6 Y5 j! G$ C1 ?) u Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters" z8 b0 h- O6 p" S6 n( @
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
9 |0 z6 ~/ ?, o+ R$ Kconditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and' @6 f6 B. I. W/ Z! q
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
$ x1 Q& C& Z# ^- N; |residential real estate sector.6 u2 q+ }. I5 T0 p9 o7 F
3 s) Y$ V- p+ W/ |
Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
" @+ c! q7 I+ j/ `9 [occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)" x1 s6 B7 h/ o/ i
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
5 q8 H* ?3 j3 \1 O( T; u; B; P8 y(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380+ [1 _2 ?7 c1 [( T7 I
(+13.2%).
+ f1 p. b3 w9 p. t. M- f* B5 o) Y8 q. J) R* Z* @. w: s7 E5 e, p
"Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth: K; ]% n z& S+ J& k
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
/ G; V4 y1 q! Y% Mfrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
- R# X. _) t* ^# g' S& a0 [poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,$ H. a) k6 p$ `
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.7 d" ? ~' u8 V+ q8 l6 x& p
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
. S" {- o7 @* ywelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
* Y) q* R7 q. ?/ ibalanced market."
" q0 U# {/ D" t: l7 `$ d+ z* l0 P0 | n Z& f. d
Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
* J3 k1 k$ X: W, _$ J- B* cconsiderable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift8 C; h- n. g( A8 p e6 b: r2 @
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
- O9 L5 ~1 C+ B* P6 gthroughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
, {& z5 {6 V; Y1 L. U+ c* ]+ qenergy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,& C) S) t3 i5 y l
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record; C0 \& l/ G5 p! U; I1 i
breaking price appreciations.( [* a3 f) w" d
2 O# h- D: R( b5 j( c h4 P Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding5 b% F0 c" T: x
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the: {6 P+ }" ?' N" T
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.0 ]2 \# W$ z$ F* Q% R1 b
0 q8 Q& ?( G- a7 t% f- v5 T4 O In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
& O' H# S; o/ D; }& }( S# yeconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
# K7 F; m/ ^% A3 V/ ]confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
& a# A. D$ e* Q% H+ x8 eslightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
4 n U L3 X; w8 G$ \In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers0 A9 M3 B9 p) s$ j7 t
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of+ Q: A+ v1 _: f8 a+ Z
price appreciation when compared with 2005.
, Q! e% C2 L' L/ O1 w9 {. D: V5 W* t$ x0 U
While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing# [4 s6 C$ `+ A! `- T8 h# D/ x
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and* e( |% s% } D( n* @2 z- \0 t( ?
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
3 B8 Z, {, U. R5 @' ]are markedly different than those found in the United States.) m! _# Z) u3 n: M9 y
" U1 C4 u* o* j V% [
Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
T I9 p% \: O$ |4 J* c* LAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
. f% ^, r" B: C! s- A5 qfavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
2 [* W. y( T4 J# R- L yrelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
0 D. ]% j4 f0 I7 ]: F5 iaffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the6 S+ f6 @9 {, D# I' W* E
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and& b3 u& D2 U: l. `
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
, s' a( t2 f9 o8 emortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."8 L# m2 J, L% s5 T( f* I
) \% Q9 \ I* U: @
<<
) f! d* P+ O2 W' {; L REGIONAL SUMMARIES
/ F/ t V( T. E2 I. x >>
9 a+ o+ q0 {) u0 \3 Q) O7 y* I9 C( ]' [: W
Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in% `( ^: A, H2 X0 M/ z) @8 O( }
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate7 m: J. y& y; ^) g' \, }. g5 k
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
( U. h) b, v9 E, clooking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
: C3 ^5 S0 r+ O% X9 N. n0 W+ Qrenovations.
3 p, `- I+ V/ a' M4 `9 p' {/ R) [7 V: y" w
The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight& `3 Q; V1 P& Z. E+ z
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation1 g: y( @3 T& A* k g; q
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and8 F( @7 E0 F) t* L k% v5 {
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
" ]+ C. Y2 ]4 E6 ?+ @% B( p9 j3 e2 O' S/ [- F( G* E6 n: q5 ~
The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
* `7 [; K+ X& c- x+ Kslowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the) j/ w6 s$ C& T
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new! ~* k* }( O- A ~0 Q5 h
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
* F7 R( {: u7 }2 I$ H4 Zto the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
/ o! W8 G7 y0 F6 ^and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
( e& m% I( n1 L% g4 w' e8 V3 s5 k( r9 ^, n3 R- K! W8 w
In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
6 r% [0 N5 N' m- c7 s( g; L( n. nconditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their" o! Q& V" I) r5 a- x; d+ M! {
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
( [! P9 Z, ^( n2 ]2 j/ _: D2 xwas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian3 B; t; ?; o, u" _. k1 X
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
0 N7 T# P3 {' [( R" ebuyers with more options when looking for a home.- q; `/ w+ R6 P, ?
' {0 |6 u' a1 \! a0 e# A S
Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
1 `# _ V! e5 A/ t% h0 B; }- Lamong higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
7 I0 h" n4 m [/ ]0 \priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
: {0 E& G8 l. {& aas some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
- ^% q9 ], o6 [' A' Afew years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
( x+ s8 _; L: N+ x) L: |, O$ @
Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house. m E6 I' V) ~ V# O3 u r- U
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory p7 j9 O. ?# b$ o: m
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
# X6 Z/ s! L$ Vfirst-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,2 d. B$ I% \2 j' j4 _
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the5 V( y( W" R& o% O$ w" I
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before! }8 }) i/ i8 d/ i0 ^
making a purchase.8 h: F3 ^: D1 h2 W& Y! V" G
J2 s: |& |- G) `: s0 A) ^3 t7 `$ ~" c Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
+ }* ~$ c+ M1 jmarkets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
' K* J! P% M1 N1 _confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city. H+ i) `7 R' v* Y1 P5 k
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
3 w: G( b$ |, v! K% j* battention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
9 l z0 [* ~- w5 Y! s" o1 damenities.: p3 \ M. P6 ^
' T7 i7 h+ Z7 W% n
The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
1 q( B8 } k6 b3 B' U' @, Othroughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand8 d; `+ `1 H" m. D
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has/ P: V4 C& F: \0 L
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
2 t t1 {8 B; J! H. I0 Hdriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
c7 f/ r3 ~5 w, ?! wresidence, rather than for investment.
h# w5 S' L. ^
7 D8 `) t6 W" P I The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
( h5 v8 J0 S3 W! D; ]9 W) x. F( `house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
' l+ i7 M% N( s' G( ]+ zin a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
* F) R$ d C! J( f' v6 H. vconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization: Z+ }. f6 _& J' R
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter4 c0 ^% ], L2 l' u# H+ h( k5 |: I
the market.
! R6 L* G5 p9 z/ w y
. s+ @/ w4 v2 N- |" |2 d8 D In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through5 p% @9 N$ t& E1 L% y' f* J
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In. o+ Z I1 K! W6 G7 j1 O
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
) r3 m/ p8 c; L4 J- ^months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
0 `4 r. Q& f& P2 x4 Mto the shortage of available inventory.
% B- k+ t! B) W" o+ P- L. e( X
, S5 y6 W+ i" R. N5 G Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its* W' U G) Q. a6 `( L
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains0 U, {; {5 |9 |7 G/ K# ~, X
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses8 w2 {! @; D7 B6 N6 l# g5 {
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
7 } [5 W' U Z9 u. E- r* f. K& u S: I2 y- J) S
Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
9 _- ]2 H- ^: u# a# a; o( ]in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low( r4 h8 |- t/ F
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
* w3 w5 j8 |) Qpressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
, v/ @( C: k" I. W- hprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
F. |+ F# P0 R& D0 ^6 `$ c/ ~season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as, t( _% b$ r4 s! T+ |( d0 l
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.0 J) z5 B& n! W8 v
( I: F3 }3 b5 V( A% m5 |' X
Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
# S" r+ d# e. T6 T4 o. C4 Kas activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton' T9 z) c9 Z. M: ~
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,% h% z* O" ^* F( F% T
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices5 c9 T2 [' i; f- W5 D
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
- d# I) r! j: e. r1 din the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly( \7 t" F7 u N3 J6 B/ ?
towards the end of 2006. , g1 v/ X8 z" p) m
/ U. q' C# U7 {. C
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of# c7 ^" K O# r+ D( M; S( G
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable* a9 | Y2 h, G7 Y, _/ o, }
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
W, G9 k/ m0 F: g1 ?& k4 q* Hgroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to. I9 q, h$ I+ m" J0 B2 Q
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added4 U+ O5 l' t/ k: @
pressure on tight inventory levels.% H8 E; ]; f% W0 o, k1 ~3 R
. B- i; q4 |3 \
Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
, D7 M. Y5 r, }/ x3 }1 ~: mfundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people3 X0 F5 J; e" Q( D6 |. ^3 F$ l2 s
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
) x0 c; Y5 \0 Z" s. M3 owhile increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching+ _. b4 h7 a5 d
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.$ X+ C) M3 v. B: G4 _$ ~3 z& _' x* x
! o1 `) l+ k- k" T7 [. m. o
<<, @4 T3 P0 D. A. j' n
Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006+ C$ ^6 r8 T4 ?
$ T. [0 [: _- d) G5 X; e* e/ q
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
" l8 y: ]$ s/ z) P3 U" @+ |5 B Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey
2 T8 ?$ q. M8 f6 A8 u' R' j -------------------------------------------------------------------------
/ e( i" Y1 m* U. a 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3
8 Z9 Z* ^) F& Q9 W1 M# p" r Market Average Average % Change Average Average
" e* e5 ^* G4 |6 y0 s# l -------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ y! N" P6 _+ h% K7 u* [% g, ~: {0 j Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000
) }- L; Z1 d5 m) e+ Z1 z" f( O3 L -------------------------------------------------------------------------! w1 u: q! J0 q5 H% X( |0 @
Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000& B$ r# @$ Q' C: m' }) P" _( l
-------------------------------------------------------------------------5 u# C$ M Y6 E- s2 E1 _
Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000
" O9 u* D/ ]! O0 G -------------------------------------------------------------------------
& p7 u* L' Q2 L; [2 u" i Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -" z" [3 W4 v; b& u
-------------------------------------------------------------------------" t( N2 [( o3 C$ N2 c
St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333
& A$ _1 J P2 Y$ Q }' M4 y -------------------------------------------------------------------------/ w! L" ^ Q" a$ C7 f* S
Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583
1 |2 {; D+ l$ x- \2 M3 x5 H- i -------------------------------------------------------------------------3 x! m! w+ k e g3 H: v8 J9 r
Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185
2 s/ d( [, R$ z -------------------------------------------------------------------------5 z8 Q8 E! Q o9 Y
Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,2503 e. {$ ~/ y3 X" ]0 x1 v4 M
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
" A4 h3 u, y6 s7 t# W1 d Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766
4 ^8 Y1 [+ E/ N& `2 Y7 n -------------------------------------------------------------------------
' V: l& Q6 {: Y: B" c Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707- N6 `/ o, A* Z( y, @. Q" p) c
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
s3 R' d1 i% M6 A. Q# V+ | Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500' e" f5 c6 H' V7 \/ {4 i, y
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
, F; _: c" {! S+ L Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389
p( F- K2 A+ Q J3 k -------------------------------------------------------------------------
; ^2 J! {7 h; g! r8 H0 p Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714
: w1 _0 R% O. |. `( L- O -------------------------------------------------------------------------
) J h" N1 X$ P# d2 Q Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500
. g) d+ k0 ^% L' ]5 Z -------------------------------------------------------------------------, [( u' ~: @ `6 s l4 ]
Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000" R6 w1 H& `& s' J
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
' B' ]$ C7 e3 O; x6 e5 q+ \! T. U National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860
5 A" _& U/ m9 G: f, w -------------------------------------------------------------------------3 v( d" Q! ?9 T8 t) B9 h. c4 C! W
& }' b9 W7 i, r' F6 T0 p -------------------------------------------------------------$ H$ ~8 n5 @* f4 Z* h
Standard Condominium
9 P* @* U, s$ N6 a -------------------------------------------------------------
% q. ]& K( I# {& Z4 J5 v: m! S) S 2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo4 z/ P {- y. D) g0 v
Market % Change Average Average % Change
$ |5 `. O' z" f- y3 s- [ -------------------------------------------------------------* f) M5 @1 N' Z) e
Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%
9 P2 L3 `" Y8 z) A -------------------------------------------------------------
H; w# X* j! `6 S$ V0 ^& { Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%9 M. o" z6 Q/ P. g4 s
-------------------------------------------------------------
+ a/ G1 t9 k7 J* G Moncton 4.9% - - N/A
3 q, O& {" N3 L) m, V -------------------------------------------------------------! }; a6 Z. ]4 |% }: a
Saint John N/A - - N/A1 A9 J3 r( V% t9 P0 G
-------------------------------------------------------------
: y: Z5 ?: w) H* s/ D$ ?! a3 k$ u St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%
8 J9 Z3 R7 l$ L& [( M x -------------------------------------------------------------! ^$ G; m: \; O5 T
Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%; W1 V* W+ J& i2 D8 _% n
-------------------------------------------------------------
1 k) [+ O* s3 ^) ^$ D( B; j Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%
1 O# z+ W- d# k% N -------------------------------------------------------------# t- D" E6 I Q
Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%
0 J2 ~5 G* a- \" X" ^ -------------------------------------------------------------% a+ x; q% J! y* f+ g
Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%
8 z0 S# R5 X0 E' C -------------------------------------------------------------" g* e8 U4 j L0 e! ?
Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%2 V0 w _; G- `# i
-------------------------------------------------------------2 M. U( Z& Z% j( x" a& `$ |
Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%) @3 u$ l% `9 S6 c6 H% X
-------------------------------------------------------------
2 R5 V, ^( {( i( K1 L6 C, ^ Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%6 |6 |- y5 j) Q; D B" L/ N
-------------------------------------------------------------) [ ?( U: F5 x* b. k
Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%) P. Y8 f% I* k; e
-------------------------------------------------------------& C& K. |: q! l( I3 p/ p
Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%% h, X& [- d" G/ R5 a
-------------------------------------------------------------* i; x3 N" ?# V# h+ e! r$ g- \
Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%
' e9 }5 I2 s" M, a% b -------------------------------------------------------------) X5 X5 X4 K q) T
National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%' C2 O0 l! q3 t1 I
-------------------------------------------------------------- n. ^9 Y+ ]% D5 O3 M6 }" s5 |5 Q
>>: V( ~2 g: n, P0 ?3 {1 s5 r
& z3 D- H6 T, z. X5 O& ^6 \ Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined! e# }4 ^+ {+ |6 o3 j
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint! K9 J" _# a/ V) I& N9 Y$ k& ?
John and Victoria.8 W$ N' c) y6 S/ k! v4 B c
) e( A. M q* s3 ?! z The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
& E% u' i8 J. v* qcomprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
+ I1 F1 h4 V; R K: Fhousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release9 h$ _/ g c& V) e( c% C4 E0 Q
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price2 k1 O/ H9 }, @0 K6 _
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
1 S" O b) ?3 C5 S- Jacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is+ e9 l3 j- K8 L3 @
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current! H# v3 ~* u" } A7 g' Y9 [
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable8 n# v, v# b' f$ Y! _
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
% a G% p u' V. C2 ?& }November 15, 2006.6 T! f8 v! N6 p4 H. L6 G
Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
/ q; Z6 M% J+ i* @0 b+ yfair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
; A4 h( I8 U7 t: J& ?/ B- i7 _ t5 [provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is3 b$ z/ N% _8 n
available for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|