 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable 1 l- J* M( ?! W* W( H# @3 Y
; x& x( K3 D. Z( S# y; z
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -+ y* k( M8 P6 ]/ X% f" T
; U2 k# Z; \' g. v4 W+ O B TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
2 k" T* \4 D oexhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
* a. a8 B, a1 M# oquarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic) y& i2 i" Q1 s) |
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit2 f0 O6 [! X) T+ ]4 A. c, d9 d4 ?0 k
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
, n, Y4 |) }" mmore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
/ S5 g, @1 v) o. Y1 k+ f4 T$ z% @Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
0 @9 ]# L4 V( o) OLePage Real Estate Services.
( ]4 s+ w, ^, G% k% T k; a- M
3 V. U: o1 x+ O! ^$ }' m. ^ Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
4 a. w! f$ z1 w2 Q" I' Nare forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic1 V) h/ D5 u; d* z1 N$ p L( ]
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and6 s7 |/ Q0 M5 Z* N7 `2 M: M: J' c
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the+ y# n" n' q4 Q3 e/ T$ R$ @4 i
residential real estate sector.
4 P5 r/ H3 C! T6 ~* H/ S& [0 n a& ~& N2 Y! W3 M
Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation+ A) r3 }" Y6 G6 s! x
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)3 L% `3 @! A6 `: v# c6 ^$ h
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562' A# `( ~: H; n! }
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,3805 R9 f/ D7 }4 j4 S0 b
(+13.2%).5 U# I I( y6 Y. q p& s1 Q- V( M
2 {' J$ [% I. z9 i- J. {% Q
"Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth9 `/ z8 U( h5 Z! {
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
4 a, E% u( |& A5 n: a6 i# T% Y# Ffrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
/ |$ Z5 d" e p. H: f5 Upoised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
3 Z5 a, S+ k3 a, x6 Jpresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.4 s# X5 e( I+ e
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
7 g% |9 f" M, y* m8 z( ^1 u( V2 ^welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
4 P$ r9 x& i0 `; s( Mbalanced market."% k( l5 ?* Y' [2 f
; ]8 D4 b9 ?% l6 z5 a% }9 n' t
Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,# ~2 K. T) c! s
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
; O7 P% L' F" u: {; _! Oto balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued! p2 M) k8 F0 X. C7 B7 E
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core7 s# Q9 j$ m# E9 U
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
2 J) V5 c4 S9 G* Mmanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record. o* Z) r6 ~4 A
breaking price appreciations.! ]2 K4 S# n6 A H9 @$ I
/ o& T1 V( T2 }$ U& ]* e5 ]6 |& z Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
7 ]) u8 Q5 h/ J$ ?' R7 oeconomy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the/ ]. c/ q7 H6 r6 {' S$ q
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.6 A" C0 Z. e3 F! m# b
4 l' O0 a8 {, l% L$ b' {2 m4 J
In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
R' a& X8 B- _4 b6 a/ veconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer1 y `- {& V2 s8 h0 d. B
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off# d2 P; P$ m. m j6 \% R8 N
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.3 s5 K) `" }& N m6 F7 \: V1 L8 Q
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers( j8 a$ I4 O, P# l* r
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of; \/ J$ ?5 ]5 A+ C4 @% r8 |9 H. [
price appreciation when compared with 2005.
3 l2 b X& a2 ]" l1 b) l1 K8 Z4 M3 Z
: b* S" S" }" T6 a m# P0 F4 r" D While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
; F& A# P0 K) O3 h" H5 mmarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
! ?' S- E8 Y7 D) q7 ?9 A G0 J1 o( wfinancial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada$ N# X( r6 Q3 x x3 `* G' w
are markedly different than those found in the United States.; h) [" b2 s! C% j/ }! O3 s9 F7 x* q
' c; o/ v5 [# l2 Q# P, ?% |4 P# ^ ? Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
4 s" Z0 p1 ?3 N* m! PAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's% F& k4 u* G; p" ~/ e
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the( h, c( w# f1 _( f# s
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general) B/ j; g4 |& u7 l6 _
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the. n) C% N4 L' o6 `+ R! j: h3 p/ R
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
! R% G% W8 u2 x3 Uaggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
1 O+ z# w, _, ^7 n: i& pmortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
( r3 o2 c$ a* [* M9 s% M. T; g9 x' b8 F! d" @& k% x
<<3 S% Q! p6 }( \7 Y+ h
REGIONAL SUMMARIES7 h# e' ^% E; n0 Z9 d
>>
2 {% N+ C+ ~0 C* Z% U" o7 t6 V
Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
1 i0 b3 p" |- [! \# ?. ^Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate9 v9 g. J; e J) ~' G
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time- N; F+ ^2 h. C6 O
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
& c$ o) i4 c* t3 lrenovations.; S# ~9 D7 V' ^* C; T) ?* S; b
) W! g) v# [- r$ \2 m9 x
The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
7 B' B, Z' p6 |0 l; @$ V' T, Jincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation4 A( S; u8 k& A% ^) C6 o
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
* t. \ S# i0 @5 H0 p1 vSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.; W" _/ ~7 R7 b6 V
3 D9 {5 i- g& L2 A: { The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
$ G% y" ]7 \5 k& }# e/ kslowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the4 I1 v% E* L8 p8 _
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
( J8 N o& O3 N1 }" q" _0 \! }600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
% ^; }( o% _7 m6 n7 K' Fto the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
6 n; V1 i5 }! ~1 y/ land are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
6 j7 v) `2 _- ?8 J, A. q) m2 E g5 }0 b
In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced: V$ s% o/ c: p6 o6 j* X, I/ ]& j/ }6 ^
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
* X, Q! y; Z3 ?: d. s9 u& Dhomes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers* E! x2 f O8 g( Z, N1 Q. @
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian' i, w$ \' \3 [3 X7 m( D
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
+ k1 f E5 ^6 V7 H' z( z9 x: ?. rbuyers with more options when looking for a home.% ~- V# C; D% D/ S# r
) M7 J- a1 H* D& c3 Z/ h# B Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
8 G# x. F/ n/ q8 [! M4 ~among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
* ^& U+ L5 |& y0 o9 npriced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
: ^! X/ d& \4 w5 uas some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last! d+ Y0 t/ D; A- i' s& i3 D
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
5 z. [6 _8 X, @- [, Y7 M3 W( l0 B+ s& T! J
Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
& S3 u* R3 N5 N8 _7 ]# j2 g" h& Lprices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
, A( b. L- u, D+ E! Vlevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
p( c4 ?/ F, y& I4 X6 K; Q7 Kfirst-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,* [# A' `+ a" Y3 `; E! F! U( c
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
$ @$ |! c1 p) z# F spressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before3 c6 X* O; r( c% L$ B. I6 [
making a purchase.
8 N! P, m: ~- {6 X# N, K5 ?* ^+ p0 l, T$ S+ n2 P/ m
Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
- |9 A2 E% |4 O$ @( Nmarkets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong' O, y8 Q8 {5 {" K
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
2 c7 Q/ \- l! b% y: e! \, }4 Vcentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting, ]# n& F9 s. T W0 ~0 ], C
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown( P" I& N* u* l+ x2 e* V
amenities.
6 ~/ o' Q7 i' J/ F- ?
8 e& k4 o- A0 l! X- `9 L' J" E+ r The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels0 E! H" A7 o1 h+ [& y
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
/ C# Y$ @7 w+ A# ]. r4 v2 _across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has' @6 {* J; G9 K. H& t" j
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been I p! o8 m: G& g2 N' |- f! \
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
+ u4 X' F2 V$ z, L Vresidence, rather than for investment.
+ K- l% `8 |4 N/ h! h0 h" r) y: w% h( N6 P+ `
The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as/ m+ e/ t3 H7 Y w. i) J
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
. C2 f l5 `/ F7 x5 ^in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
* b( J# L7 r" hconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization$ t+ s; Y5 i0 _7 r3 G' u9 Z# e
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
( @! j: c/ u0 Ethe market.
. ?9 d6 d6 [; O( x, h9 K# d0 M2 n8 t
In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through8 v+ J! s% ^8 h3 R# }3 i
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
9 z6 e, f4 v$ \. HAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
& ^! y2 }4 }0 \7 Nmonths, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due! {, T; L r( g
to the shortage of available inventory.& @. `8 u- F- F: O- ~
' q2 ~6 u5 u/ g; f* d4 e, O' |" {* j+ y Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
+ T" K6 W2 [ p' c4 u4 s4 Zmomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
6 |- R: ~/ S& @) Xvibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses7 Z3 z0 y* G) E4 a% U4 B
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.) }$ c6 i4 u$ q, V& A
" g) s0 n1 j/ T5 [% z Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
+ s& {% z7 ` {. B! jin the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
/ S5 z; g+ m; T" P# tunemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
; m# k+ R) E: |/ b& Apressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring9 ^) W6 X2 r# ~8 y( K5 [) F4 N
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer& o$ \0 O9 }" x* E+ U& x, u3 O
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
2 J+ b, h6 T* O( c8 s$ jbuyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.* ?: d3 J& ?5 t1 x$ U
- z2 Z. i5 N/ c/ f$ q Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter6 N" |# [2 O) @ g" d
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
' Z7 F+ v( \6 K r2 k2 s) Gremained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
# K+ r, I" a2 ~# |/ z) O+ x5 Hmaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices ?8 a/ x) a. [9 ?
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
/ v1 \0 g) D* i; ain the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
( a$ @6 W' ?$ \" t, ]) wtowards the end of 2006. , e; H) W$ c* ^7 P; s
/ D0 ~/ l, h# P
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of( u+ p% L+ h2 G% c
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
6 l5 q* \7 D2 S3 |; Y" i6 pto meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse2 B8 h- B) _$ B# I& L. D5 c
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
: `7 ?) F$ [0 W, ?: S3 [' ]foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added) o3 Y: ~9 M0 I* e8 E
pressure on tight inventory levels.& e( g) |6 y J+ e% h
9 m' r$ m* m& B, l2 ]
Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
3 ^4 x( Y& d9 ^$ x3 g$ Lfundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
9 t0 L c0 x0 {# g# k! L5 sinto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
2 t: N$ k, [5 O$ Hwhile increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching' V2 F# v% K! z; [
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
) T1 {4 ^/ |8 v/ Y9 q( J- d
% C' M/ J. ~; X( F <<" f9 ?# {/ C3 s. z
Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
5 i% x' e/ z" S: L; S$ z0 ]
3 N) F# b! B; y: Q" L- ` -------------------------------------------------------------------------9 e" c$ l w5 [- h5 r+ H8 N: w8 {
Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey
) C3 u, v. y# J$ b# ^, K -------------------------------------------------------------------------
: h9 x" Y% ~9 R8 c+ O, N$ p5 u 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3
6 f- A5 [. G$ r0 v+ j Market Average Average % Change Average Average
6 g7 |. [* e$ \3 R" }' f4 }: }. R! l -------------------------------------------------------------------------* |2 z: w0 f" }4 j$ A: L- A
Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000
% I1 T; J8 `4 H! A+ D -------------------------------------------------------------------------* r- N. D$ ]. y- z! Z: \6 u
Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,0004 z7 S) `; y' Z8 Y9 D" M" L
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
# B7 }4 }: S+ C& l5 A Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000" D1 h) c! N. O( l9 P: \/ h
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
5 t- ~" d" D6 N# @5 W$ G5 s) V Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -4 M7 W" Y3 o" ^/ \. s; C
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 P1 x: w8 x$ y: H St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333
/ v+ S8 f* p M) D -------------------------------------------------------------------------
: }1 P! ?4 O x4 c Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583# V4 ^& b; N# d7 v
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
' P6 W, w( i8 T+ X0 H Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185
. V- s! o3 R! w: s5 B' _+ z. p -------------------------------------------------------------------------
! k3 _0 C( E/ w2 | Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250
: V0 G6 z1 l+ U: K$ M% o5 P -------------------------------------------------------------------------$ g: g3 v7 `$ d
Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766
5 N1 d# g; U" c- T9 A4 c4 b" [ -------------------------------------------------------------------------- N2 d% a8 ~/ }% v
Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707
6 K: U! i! F e) g8 z U; ^ -------------------------------------------------------------------------
7 k3 e& Z* z* X Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500
0 p0 g( [$ w- _% \: p9 S+ B, U -------------------------------------------------------------------------5 b- c- V! S$ H! m9 u4 M8 X7 B
Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389/ A' a( @/ j$ ^) K# r/ Y
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
7 z- i1 C# n. h& A& d5 @/ E Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714& a+ J( C+ Y0 A
-------------------------------------------------------------------------, d9 ~! i9 `6 v
Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500
. w2 N: q& t4 D* h0 y9 @7 v -------------------------------------------------------------------------! [, ^9 S) d' L5 l f) Y6 C
Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000
/ X9 L+ |& I( Y2 M -------------------------------------------------------------------------
. u' P" b! h W National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860
- o8 F9 \# ]7 F6 D2 n t- m -------------------------------------------------------------------------. N- O. {2 n8 l) p+ B1 Y+ T" n4 \
& |) \: s% I6 q3 \9 V
-------------------------------------------------------------
- ^& z: O1 H2 B1 x5 S0 D- } Standard Condominium
9 u. x/ l- |. i8 M -------------------------------------------------------------3 p" e5 p: ?) ^7 ?
2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo( [8 Z/ i8 x2 M
Market % Change Average Average % Change" Z! a2 h) P5 l4 F1 H) y
-------------------------------------------------------------/ `* Z+ I7 c' `/ B! O0 S) z
Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%4 O" W% u+ W9 k1 A3 x7 r8 ?1 X
-------------------------------------------------------------
0 K. q1 _1 N+ q/ m0 `* v2 I# b Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%
. u' h, `0 L n# I' y `! C9 J -------------------------------------------------------------. i5 V# s" _# W& i$ R" p) ?
Moncton 4.9% - - N/A
4 e7 f4 ~/ Y* T$ }4 @# S -------------------------------------------------------------
# `# U* {0 ^* F, v" @ Saint John N/A - - N/A
. r/ k) P4 {7 i. _ -------------------------------------------------------------- ?7 d$ |; [: U: D7 d
St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%: U7 i) Z& K* Y6 q7 C3 `4 v& W! Q
-------------------------------------------------------------
G- N( F0 w6 J3 X; d. c& W Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%
& f# e% ^- p9 Z( x4 y6 r) O4 q -------------------------------------------------------------5 l( ^; ~8 c" f( }! K$ }
Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%$ m& I: x7 ?: g
-------------------------------------------------------------. j' ]7 V" `; s" M$ y# b
Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%# N4 ^6 F1 B0 [$ X B4 _
-------------------------------------------------------------7 s$ [( R8 z& I
Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%
9 O/ o1 \5 L4 ~& I- M) C$ C' R# r -------------------------------------------------------------4 P# g& d! w1 Z( X+ r4 U7 p4 i
Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%% q* R$ I1 j1 s0 N
-------------------------------------------------------------0 }- f/ c. v7 a; @) \/ O S0 b
Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2% a. i: M0 `& C+ n: @$ v: r
-------------------------------------------------------------: x4 P' p" j7 \' s4 y
Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%
8 a& P3 R, z! v5 v -------------------------------------------------------------6 W$ P7 ^+ w3 e% b- n
Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%
+ ] ]1 k8 {% N3 R$ ?& ~" h' C/ l7 A -------------------------------------------------------------
' Y8 H5 `0 U* c9 i& p Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%
: t0 Q* u, }. N! P+ W5 [0 I -------------------------------------------------------------
( {+ x' R$ e7 _1 e Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%/ e% s2 Z$ d6 h; U! [0 Y
-------------------------------------------------------------, \. c! O# |+ Z3 j
National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%) d) ?3 [+ H3 Z1 E* b, y
-------------------------------------------------------------2 O5 }0 Q" ?6 N. H' N) L
>>
6 X H) [! {% x2 I- z
( U8 N5 |: u1 D5 p0 Z) M F, K3 e) y0 D: q! O Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
+ N v L+ c% w, F! Q- S1 ?. K! [in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
) o- w. Q6 l& CJohn and Victoria.0 n1 D/ w# m, Q$ I- I1 N
. a$ B! u) h: X% _2 ]
The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most1 h, Y" \5 a% z$ ~
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of( n( ^/ K9 k4 G9 T5 V9 V
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release0 o0 q! L- x7 m; l; O* e5 W
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price5 I9 Q8 A' u" _) a6 C
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
g/ W& q& e$ I6 w$ W" J4 X6 ^; H" macross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is: D! H# m" @# j
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
% C; s. ~2 Q% @# @ I L9 y/ }figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable1 S" u3 d0 H- n# @3 n6 e
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
9 s0 v( i# w, _% J* u lNovember 15, 2006. x) l* ^1 F0 n& L
Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
5 |# X i- F R) @, i8 bfair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
; C0 j) J, |# v |) @# l0 Dprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
* m' v* g& E% Xavailable for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|