埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2555|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
8 |5 k1 o; H- J( G; |: E9 b
& |7 ^: j6 d5 l% x- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
, U* C# Y1 }6 ^% f) ^' e- z% ]1 a' m' k
    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
1 T& b# e$ q( qexhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
8 u2 y; _+ b  \2 m. p0 f% cquarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
' D" e2 S& C1 W7 A0 s, Iin the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit! _0 w# y  E# D& s) {
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and! p0 W8 H9 H- x
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,0 t& Z3 _' J& C
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
% F6 I* J0 t/ _5 Q4 x6 U) s. tLePage Real Estate Services.
# K; K7 ]" R% M! [  n1 v
4 i& g5 L! e+ H% E! Y    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
- b* j( {5 G* _) i. }+ ~& [  Pare forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
4 K6 K0 ?2 s( ^+ l  ~conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
" M5 G- r' f9 vsound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
, s3 ?0 p: e1 I8 _' t; k; Zresidential real estate sector.
; V2 j4 {, t8 U% l5 B3 s
; e' [/ S9 m3 O& r  N+ A& \    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
" g6 D& ]4 J" u; Q" p2 W3 Joccurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
* D7 j* G1 k6 I' `' t# @year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
3 @/ R8 v; [' D! @; M2 ~(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380% ?  e6 I$ w9 V# f! N" K
(+13.2%).
, d& f, k) V9 g* P5 Q. E% l1 V* t4 Z( ?) I/ U6 T
    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
, M# Q# ?" T" G8 Bduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the" o1 x2 `) S1 z$ }& [
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
! a- c/ L2 ?" W& bpoised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,! J% [$ P' A2 N( W6 R) d
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services./ I  M( T5 B% T7 h9 n: d3 i' q; L
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We. }& D- h, ~$ K" U2 P
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
6 W/ }0 p9 U5 ^* g- Pbalanced market."& d1 q7 a8 a" d2 x! x

; f) j/ L" R7 t  U7 H    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
5 o& y2 v( [/ t1 V5 Y9 \0 x, bconsiderable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift1 Q% z1 {! |! H( H& r5 t% L- V+ U
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued% V0 `% ?: d- ]+ Y
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core/ s4 j4 U  @# O9 a% x7 e" O% q
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,9 k( g( Z% y1 _/ l+ {1 r
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
1 k) k6 W% F) Cbreaking price appreciations.# U" w+ G& t  D: Z  b& ~: I
" m- h7 Z! H; [2 H
    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding" e" R( O: t! P1 O# J
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
6 Y1 |' j; u- plargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.9 [  t5 u1 \! q  Z, J* |

, Y% d; E! g  x    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid+ D9 k$ O0 |, R; J# y
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer1 r1 L1 V3 p( e5 m5 |/ N! u% i
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
. B, J' ]4 W( \6 _/ Sslightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.: I' {0 ~( d8 x0 h
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
3 L' P; e8 K3 K6 o; B3 A& agreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of- l, G. Q" o" \4 u8 _, i
price appreciation when compared with 2005.
( v5 v% m9 q& o, \7 h/ U) i1 v4 J- v- O' T0 T
    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
8 b, `/ d: F: G& t, Zmarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and; A5 F. ]& n( E, }0 c
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada& Q* P2 e; z. R% A7 A, R$ C
are markedly different than those found in the United States.
6 a. N( C( h  W# s: d$ y( z/ h% W: y; o4 d4 ^
    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
- h, @! m# N% r9 n! `4 bAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's- s1 Q( x8 @# i4 u. K4 Q
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
5 [% g1 W8 q3 i; w" orelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
4 S  a* S# w0 w8 ^7 L# ]% J3 yaffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
- ^* U; o* }9 L! @9 J$ v1 ?downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
% P5 g- Z+ _: K2 i* i7 X3 ~) ~aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
7 ^3 ?3 k7 Z/ \mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
0 N- P; S" N/ T8 s$ V3 B! k4 k: y# S3 g! x& H3 u
    <<; |$ W& Q7 E  K7 \
                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES
9 v6 r5 a4 c- s    >>+ Q5 k) f6 e$ V
8 _3 Z( B3 G3 S& A
    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in% k6 n  ?3 K) S% V: s# q
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate, B9 N+ ], @  g6 r' Y7 ~) t& ~
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
- S+ q" j( D0 y1 D  b. Ylooking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
/ A. z  z0 \9 K7 q) g& ?renovations.8 U, F" t6 Y5 K3 H, d
) {# w. D! M1 n" Z7 ]
    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
# ~* e; _  j4 s4 [increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation0 q: X  q" E( {5 j; Q
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and7 J' }. e5 O0 S8 ?% P6 K
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
2 f# X" U7 v" Z3 r' `  s1 X% R+ _5 m: o' [1 P$ _" n9 |2 J
    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
, u8 L7 Z0 V" C6 M$ j6 p. jslowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the. n! p; Q8 J8 @/ F
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
6 Z. t9 u' L- I/ s0 I4 X" \600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores" `$ f2 l5 q( s( H& p& U0 C
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
" ^5 p. U# f: ?* \: _. ]and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.) Z8 z7 A" C/ V
: x7 s# ^! l' M* h5 P. v
    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
4 z% }% ]* c; j$ M9 Pconditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their0 P' k4 u( W4 S2 S( C
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers& ?: \3 A1 ^) y% O
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
4 X0 i0 \" ~, l( }7 @. Pdollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
' M) m* v, w4 A% N5 nbuyers with more options when looking for a home.& ?/ z2 d% `5 \" k

  q3 j6 k% t$ \' u# @3 K. X    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
8 f! F+ h6 |) W- m# `7 }& [; n3 V9 gamong higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes* u# Z  m6 r6 e- \" S
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
+ A; O5 J" l* y3 e8 Las some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last% j, S/ R  C) [7 d" v# R" u# M. a9 D" p
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.8 @8 m9 A7 q% m2 G

' X# z/ n' `) x    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
8 a- a+ ^0 I; H1 f+ Vprices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory! x0 C  y  @" d( Y/ Y, l% C9 Y
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
' v) \/ p- Y1 |! sfirst-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
' S: T' |: d. ^& P% d/ a1 Fwhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the! _* p6 |- m+ z1 V8 S; z( [% p" k
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
) j: f. Z' q8 K; S; U( e; q, @making a purchase.- d' X. P9 v  V- n

" h8 L* G" J1 U    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing0 c  ^7 {) g& [* T
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
% @/ j" w/ v5 A2 P9 ~, w& ^confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
4 u6 s7 x: f8 [% B& ?2 o( gcentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
+ i2 V- B$ M$ H* _3 mattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
3 F# y5 N7 G. f$ |4 S, g6 _amenities.
4 v- n* D# y# {  G4 ]. G, X3 ~% E) z. o, X, Q( Z
    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
! i: E9 b9 q* R" D2 q$ X" |: Tthroughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand2 w5 e  O+ j1 P
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
0 }( S7 W' p2 O0 H9 l- Dcontinued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
( _0 o2 Y& G, u/ R- A9 J* M& t( ndriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
; g! l6 c, k5 e, R( b# Eresidence, rather than for investment.0 k* ]2 d9 i' l0 n" ]/ ^3 a

8 O- q+ y. a: J1 P( ?    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
4 y0 U& Y5 x7 o9 K  q  L; Khouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
0 R8 W- [; r5 h4 C# W5 u$ U) P$ uin a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer. X) M$ F8 z# i. t3 a4 a
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization) N" B/ Z, U4 Q
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
. u  k7 ~  T2 |3 z+ X0 kthe market.  M- s- S+ Q4 y' i9 @

) G7 x7 y' v2 d9 k4 o    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through; ~* w7 f  {' [" \7 J
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In  c. H$ V/ d1 [, D7 [
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
# m0 O1 J4 b$ {# Z- K6 fmonths, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due+ r8 {7 A+ m$ Z1 X& [
to the shortage of available inventory.( g% z. v$ h( |! Q. M

" i, ^0 ]9 [( v" ]; U5 B+ `$ b    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its, m' f& b" B! [1 y0 r9 G
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains, Y+ h8 P* a' y$ ]
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses! o% v2 p- v9 w' T) K, W3 x
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.3 ]( _5 p+ ]- \3 W  p" w7 _/ F) \
4 m9 k  x$ M  I+ ^) W5 Q3 X8 p
    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
$ |9 c! N" ^, ^. B; Oin the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low6 g6 M5 y! x3 U6 o, g" k3 r
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that5 a$ ], A# ?- a) w  N4 Q
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
$ O2 A" j/ l" _& @prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
/ d' F! L/ F6 Lseason - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
; z4 G. B$ `% O7 |! Fbuyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.

. b  t( p1 ]7 S6 Q+ ^3 w4 L) L. \" G$ A1 g- m( Y3 y: L
    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter& W5 _) y% s# s8 R: Y' Y
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton6 P( R' g) V2 H* c; ]9 u9 d& `
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
; [* w$ \8 i# V- jmaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
' ~$ }& P$ g5 B: T4 o- Y4 ?. nincreasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
; ~# v# v( d' a  T/ Pin the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly& q- z8 Y! |9 u+ d3 Y7 g3 g% C
towards the end of 2006.
    ' X/ j* m/ t( T  _/ H

9 Y/ c/ O- k" ]. LWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
8 w2 c+ B7 `7 R* Q: J+ Xinventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable+ m( Z% _; Y3 Y' u6 t6 e# f
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
$ W: h0 Q8 B& ?8 L; pgroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
' ^2 u' `+ B2 t) Q" p: k- t8 X! cforeign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
1 A0 l, T- y! X, Zpressure on tight inventory levels.
% W' L8 j: G' E, T3 o+ k1 B* H5 f  A$ n& @7 d
    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic) {. a9 r2 u8 Y+ j) y
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
9 c- W9 W$ \8 C- [. qinto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
7 B+ |/ u; y+ y4 M, U% |: Vwhile increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
8 p+ n9 |& ?2 K8 A& Yfor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
2 l) d& X  o0 ^( e; {
# q% T/ o! u1 F5 n    <<
4 t) M( b9 w; X! C+ ]      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
8 e* k9 I/ Y2 _( w$ t% ]+ k5 E# {! N+ L. J- C
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
' K% M" [  Y+ s5 }! z: ~                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey
3 }9 f. a/ z4 }    -------------------------------------------------------------------------& a0 T& M8 g' [# z$ e
                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q3
' T/ H6 O5 E, Q( @/ Y    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average
1 p( a. F7 a7 n' f    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
' D9 Q" _: w( J- Y/ I; E    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,000
" s$ l3 `& s& ~& E9 Q; R/ C  l    -------------------------------------------------------------------------$ P. Y( ^, M  {3 f$ H
    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,000
+ z+ }+ z; Z: @. L+ X    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
9 X# L; G- N6 F" D7 E    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,000) E6 o& }* S0 m4 H, }
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------6 i8 N' |0 U, B3 h% G
    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -! R, I- T1 q) X$ C# @2 h
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
# ?; q$ U/ s: r+ D7 U    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,3331 J6 u! Y2 e$ y9 l9 `6 b8 ~
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------, e5 B1 y# Y2 w, W( h3 X, j$ \
    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,583  F0 p/ R/ }! D8 w$ A& q( y% E
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ t- I0 Y0 O' T6 t! g, p    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,185
0 e( E7 h6 Z8 l- d    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
# {! i. q1 \6 n* k1 [9 P    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,250) G2 L: J- W/ B2 {3 G
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------& {5 w* \' y9 M; r# `0 N8 E
    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,766
4 b- U7 s& `2 t" l    -------------------------------------------------------------------------$ G1 U9 F! s6 ^
    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,707
( B% ?- `( n/ A( o% j4 f  t    -------------------------------------------------------------------------! F5 V! z% r, |2 U8 D+ }# g  N% q
    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,500
; k6 f; e' w+ C8 f# V8 A    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
( ?% e' ?# Z5 ~7 Z, |    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,389
1 o: ~; n- U& ~2 V  }    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
  E4 a/ F$ @5 `: n0 S    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,714
. j! I8 f* c( K$ ^    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
# U: o3 V% A5 W# ^3 f    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,500. Q( ]# v! `+ [; o
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
# T/ Y' D- V6 G" r) {1 ~    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,0005 X' q2 r7 x  j- _) [! ~
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------# w. O8 E! ]; q' Q' l, {' f
    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,860' B: n  r' C6 w8 Q. o5 f( r$ f
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------7 `1 x- y0 e" Y/ Q8 ]
" M$ ^  {. u9 a: L( |1 W
    -------------------------------------------------------------( ^, _- q$ L) z' D7 n2 a
                               Standard Condominium
4 q1 K+ W0 y3 b/ I9 f8 Z    -------------------------------------------------------------. Y( X( ^3 ?6 I$ j- `4 P
                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo
- G5 _4 q0 h: [# s  T6 P% P, r    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change2 {) ?3 _3 E0 l( M" R
    -------------------------------------------------------------% R5 w  y- f7 A
    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%
4 J2 L( v0 I$ P( \    -------------------------------------------------------------' J$ F8 y1 V4 {" V) W+ r
    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%
- K/ Y$ v- ^' W1 ^* V; X) [1 v    -------------------------------------------------------------
7 C6 t( R0 Q* a- y& L    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A+ z0 `  h0 R, f4 v$ O) q3 l
    -------------------------------------------------------------
$ g/ l2 a5 e' d$ j! B. v, a    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A: L3 u: G/ x# a
    -------------------------------------------------------------
0 }8 W# D5 j- X4 b    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%
$ {' z( x1 F# }    -------------------------------------------------------------$ Q% g6 z' L! ?9 x4 W7 q. ^2 C- ~
    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%- q: p1 O5 y* N2 h/ I8 k
    -------------------------------------------------------------& ^/ |- w3 w0 D. ]
    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%
" @8 Z% q4 l7 O( \- j6 G    -------------------------------------------------------------3 |: V1 h! F0 B% a4 m0 W) U
    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%
) c; U! u2 b1 c6 b- m# Z, y    -------------------------------------------------------------
% q$ R) [7 @/ ^- q! d9 r    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%
) J. {7 [* K0 p$ U  O: n    -------------------------------------------------------------" N) V& l) Z! i9 y2 N4 q! y; V
    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%
$ X! A! X* v9 N% m( t# e% B    -------------------------------------------------------------
# S, w& R3 j/ B4 o5 T, X    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%5 j# u" y4 Q' i
    -------------------------------------------------------------
3 F. k/ c( l. D2 T" |    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%& _! m( A+ U/ Z: R
    -------------------------------------------------------------
. B; s( p7 r1 ~2 D, h( e    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%
+ m" q: ]: R0 c2 f3 P1 T    -------------------------------------------------------------
, w0 a5 p# C/ t    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%2 g1 w! A1 E& S. l5 ^
    -------------------------------------------------------------& f# J) g# b; X
    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%
; y) M( _, u3 P' W: k4 t    -------------------------------------------------------------8 i  `9 o2 ]8 a' G4 o
    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%. ?1 @0 A* G5 _% M
    -------------------------------------------------------------. {  ?5 M+ h  q) l
    >>
, s1 s& C/ M' C6 b; w) L3 W7 y8 H9 w8 I% v1 W$ X# I- `' a
    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined+ I6 {1 s# ?9 o5 H% B2 w
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
4 n+ x6 z0 t5 E! W% O( z) q8 K6 `John and Victoria.
! D! H# ^7 c/ N& r1 g0 ]) |4 f
& l! g: i' \# c) X+ k! a    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most6 r; w( \, l+ \7 ~5 X
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
- b4 \4 p$ E0 R' ehousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release' z+ ^4 M7 \- I0 T3 ?& A! y
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
2 z6 e7 V# _1 x6 w, l9 z* o/ A! rtrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities2 {+ s/ H3 w2 V' E9 E- Z1 l! C1 O& m
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
2 [  L0 O$ [! b* Oavailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current  k* X. `9 M1 |: l8 f5 Y: F
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable* f, k- k: L5 H$ y
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
8 b+ ?+ W# R( l" \2 qNovember 15, 2006.4 V+ K* |+ f( f
    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
0 _3 M; w7 |; z* |: Lfair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge8 V* i" E8 Q6 }, q, y
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is: s: K( E, M, J8 F  P% O* E
available for some areas back to the early 1970s.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-8-1 20:02 , Processed in 0.185350 second(s), 10 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表