data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2be05/2be05cc864c48667c32731a4180ae506d6a7b8ba" alt="" 鲜花( 0) data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2f114/2f11409f18c73499c7999d6706890da8b74a7970" alt="" 鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable / v$ x) Y3 J- ^7 ^8 L
6 x. w* U# \2 [. l$ K0 a. i- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
! x" }# ?3 u6 o% B n7 t1 T9 w! \0 u/ ?' H$ X6 y+ p
TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market* _5 o" e9 p7 b, N# A K/ F
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
4 i( Q- Y r/ H2 K V& mquarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic5 \: I8 r, H s0 h& K! [, u
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit v* u/ }/ a' A C9 L+ o
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
& E7 F! [' X$ z# m" |' nmore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
! A# g% Y+ z( E+ JQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
1 L" L c, R) ^LePage Real Estate Services.9 x' P( O8 w1 c) u* }) t
/ m0 U9 n6 I) H5 o- \ Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters2 I; |/ \, X+ s# I! X
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
7 l- c1 s, [; rconditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
( H q1 T* X! D" w4 V/ Ksound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
5 |- Z' J# g! k5 t( m) f0 r: Gresidential real estate sector.
, F3 R6 q5 y D8 u
9 E3 B) H d2 z5 m Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation9 N, T3 S5 i; n6 d
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)$ w8 l7 B8 [ m x3 I% n/ b
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562, m9 A) i0 l' E' X
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
9 ]6 W2 ]. _. f/ M(+13.2%).$ { l' S6 f- n& o4 r! h
" U, O: [+ L- J3 a; Y, I R. a
"Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth' ]- G- r# [9 F
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
( M8 J7 @9 a& W& t) z- G4 ofrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
" V& q$ C3 l! l1 L; N4 Y) Xpoised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
8 ]9 N _6 p" hpresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.: D9 ^& D; i% Y$ W: i
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
- A4 s$ q! j9 G4 Z9 o. w3 T) ^welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
6 j, }9 [& X$ K6 gbalanced market."
x- p$ V% x D
' B, b" r) G% ~* y/ y& W Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,& v. ^: M* Z- {9 j/ k Z* J- a, W
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift. @0 S! d2 X) k
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued% f+ ?# n$ w7 }( t e' W4 Q2 a
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core: s6 Q" Y/ {; I( U N6 {
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,) L# \* w% R+ U T1 @9 Z
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record" j0 T5 h% u! v3 O( s8 y
breaking price appreciations. p; ]6 _0 h& T6 G2 C# {5 H
% \7 {9 p+ a8 q# u1 u
Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding, r, c; }5 G" J: L3 t+ e7 j& I/ X
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
; [7 U0 E7 S/ {4 ?9 M2 f Jlargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.9 w( I! Q; d8 M$ R& e
4 V% `9 y, X! Y
In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
7 Q# r! Y1 G9 B- _$ }economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer/ U4 a; d; D" E, ^' o
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
) y6 h" f/ g4 t+ b F. w" Sslightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
# g8 {0 F2 _+ [ F$ P BIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers; f2 _) W8 @2 W
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of, x- I( w4 p. U# F5 k8 L
price appreciation when compared with 2005.
, n2 Y' `4 c4 H; F8 A4 z9 ~7 \" n9 t: u& M5 w: `
While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing- d) m' y; N! M% w: ?- _
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and2 k& L5 K/ P- K1 v: G
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada Z+ {3 a& Q- F
are markedly different than those found in the United States.8 }+ \2 @7 q8 m: Q3 A
. D p# B# r L
Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the2 L6 Q! E4 P1 l, t( I J
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's k: g. K3 |, G: p9 q! b
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the) m- ~6 W5 ^1 l r- D" W6 S$ F' q/ \; Y+ y1 m
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general# \8 e: v' i* R: f
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
2 f# [5 h# E! c% `( T0 N9 adownside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
* t+ I4 k' G4 }3 Iaggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
$ V, ~. h$ X+ `* X: P! \mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
8 j. y% d) C& y, y8 X2 O. V' K5 v6 Z, ?3 H# h
<<
- u9 ^8 X) w1 C2 M; t REGIONAL SUMMARIES
8 j3 d6 W) I% u! N, d, Y >>
$ F, z7 L/ p' m9 v4 H7 F
6 t# I; t) z! r8 i9 v1 k Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
" t1 L+ \- @2 T4 U; u5 K2 ?9 ?; F( qHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
0 O5 h& \2 k7 m9 Dof price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time. O* k. w5 ^, r8 z
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of3 v- A# N4 S$ `; J$ A
renovations. f% l- f* p4 q8 c
8 i8 N1 f# X0 b) G& ]# U The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight: F6 `/ ^$ ` s
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
; N# J6 W# a# \4 o5 K$ R+ rcompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and* C6 g4 B- u+ ^; M
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.8 D* U# E/ r& R" p: o) K [
+ B7 S5 ~. U/ b* Q9 ^% s# E$ }
The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer2 J) _ X8 z7 X. F
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the( k' G* o W: e/ C! a9 G. @- g. L! o
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new2 a# E, k" R) b* W4 U
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
" S2 ]2 x: f9 r9 W3 Rto the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
$ w; ^* r3 `+ [) l/ P4 T/ cand are instead opting for more affordable housing options.& T. G P; b7 Q- a" {. C# s: T
; K' O2 s# L. g7 u+ `% i
In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
, z0 T6 k M) ^( X/ A1 Kconditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their* h& o. c: H3 {3 u# `
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
& r, V4 W* f) W5 f+ M) Xwas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
1 e3 [+ }7 U7 \7 pdollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
" b& R1 `* f5 q7 Bbuyers with more options when looking for a home.
# H3 X: O& q% ~! j
8 Q( C* |7 r; i Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
0 ]+ H$ o$ g# L% {among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
' a# x1 G4 l2 ]: Lpriced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
; x0 p3 K( C% s" h$ ]as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
. K6 K6 X# V! d9 ]1 [& H5 q! _5 mfew years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.- K% X# B( X7 y5 P* V. P
# R( u1 h u5 d* c/ A q: k
Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house1 d# `* J% _- l1 c H1 d! c# Q$ Q
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
2 r7 h; k+ M7 w( Glevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
7 q- n% h. `% F" nfirst-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
6 J% x' e1 s7 z. \; E3 D3 ^4 \when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
6 [! H# ^. B/ Z; @- ?pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before" t% a: [. ~3 X; e
making a purchase.4 u# Y5 B& {% E9 y
, I; q0 _& w+ l* n' W7 m# S" G. m Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
S% ~8 K x8 P6 ymarkets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
6 U8 r7 O1 Z K. c1 J5 x& u) O7 vconfidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city- d, C1 H; t2 {4 Y
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
& R. Z9 B8 m# t6 ~8 S Battention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown) A8 f! [7 x# x7 |% { k
amenities.+ V8 _( Y- n& ?3 v D& `" n' \
$ L0 z0 V, y9 q/ \+ R2 r' A* \3 [ The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
4 k; w; B, K( x8 Qthroughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand$ A% x1 h" F4 N6 D- { }
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has. d- @3 v, i* J# O# w* d% V
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been2 K1 U: m: O7 x
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle7 g* R5 b: ~ |7 [
residence, rather than for investment.6 g2 r! f2 m2 R( r% \
+ ? O* }, m5 f! w
The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
3 {( h, T7 ]- X: {) a+ lhouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
( d' y1 t( Z! j* ~* v* A7 Fin a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
- l _1 R. v: H1 j2 aconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization) ?) e+ i. ^- z: e5 C
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter" D) G& a( d: q& d
the market.- B1 k. a. Z' y* j7 Q1 _
) s% H( o( R# k3 W7 [& H% E3 Q In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
% b, C$ p1 [, |& A GJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
1 ~( L/ u! @( jAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
8 v# ]( |' W% e: V4 z, o1 v; Q" _months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
& ]8 W& Q1 i5 c5 p! ^to the shortage of available inventory.$ w% b, g2 i% I
( }5 o1 V* o6 k2 F- j( \( ?6 k Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its' ?% O$ [3 G# A
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains3 k0 F4 _. D% Y9 L' u
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses6 \) y' r! s, C" ~! c& q
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.+ Q8 e8 k$ [+ o/ z1 M% P
5 t0 K% {5 _0 j2 m1 f' n [! c. S Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
" d( H! ]; h: L5 h$ cin the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
9 ]4 u% U0 t8 D9 \) w9 Kunemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that9 t0 o! Q0 r+ B; `' v6 q# v$ X
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
! B: r+ _+ w* V0 M- W: W4 Vprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
" W" D! @8 v. C2 J% Bseason - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
* y- X( @2 c, pbuyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.6 v$ {& Y Z; y6 o7 b# W
. d2 j' I2 [9 o3 h
Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter" {( h1 b l- W) o0 [9 K
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
9 b7 c. L2 Y3 j6 H( J! zremained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,7 C( B2 _8 M3 a9 C! {
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
1 H K8 d8 G1 C7 ~7 q0 |increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve- `* q( U. f! d' G
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
9 U# D1 x7 N/ ~+ [, h5 a( g) T0 rtowards the end of 2006.
) R6 Z: J# Q: k3 a2 a# a% A( P$ _3 ~: \, L/ U5 A
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of) i# s" h7 A# p3 `% m! T! W
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
, Z3 i$ |3 o2 f% Kto meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
) l7 g8 B' V5 s. Sgroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to: @* u# i! G9 z. n) d. s1 Y$ u
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added+ @4 c3 P& B0 ]) ^" z% X
pressure on tight inventory levels.0 j3 N; I# W( }1 z8 m% g- Z
4 r1 X% A% ~: A5 x. H; m Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
( d5 S0 S- H+ y4 D- ?fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people; M7 b/ S7 ?+ M& o* R1 Z' x
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
5 ]% q0 y% y S+ T5 f5 E: Bwhile increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching3 C& W" Z9 J! A/ F2 l# o+ a- S
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.& T0 k! }* K( H! P c
- O4 @+ B' z X! s5 a <<, K; e5 Q; m& T( I0 A. ~3 z
Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006" P* H2 @" E/ K- t! F
7 ]: z9 Q$ I3 q; \* y' k
-------------------------------------------------------------------------2 _2 N |0 |3 E% J# o
Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey& p, W. S+ O+ }2 J5 u; h
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
* s% M4 m- k8 ]( x" w( w0 I/ I' } 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3
+ u1 ~* M5 g! n Market Average Average % Change Average Average
7 I+ [; D X) T3 J) Q- k2 \* t -------------------------------------------------------------------------
: U @- y, e' r7 s8 n: \( n: e Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000
* f) ~* D8 {. ?' K' c -------------------------------------------------------------------------
" R+ y( B& q7 O% }- c Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000
( g1 e* u) C8 l _3 `0 ~' H -------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 z9 m' n$ |$ ?- l# |$ U Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000
9 O' D+ a6 N) D) h ------------------------------------------------------------------------- C+ N0 k* j. u$ Y( T, F' T7 s
Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -
2 S6 ~3 z o# v3 e1 y7 d -------------------------------------------------------------------------; H/ }( E4 y% C+ ~! S
St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333- I6 q8 O5 E+ k
-------------------------------------------------------------------------4 c5 h' m* ?0 l0 F" d0 a- q& \
Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,5833 {- ]9 r) }$ z/ b$ T( g5 I
-------------------------------------------------------------------------% d" \9 }3 v3 ^9 j9 f7 @3 A
Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185
& g0 M. t" F1 G" {- `: R6 ] -------------------------------------------------------------------------! S+ X* f0 ?2 j% t
Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250& B) R/ ?9 S0 {' |4 H
-------------------------------------------------------------------------: e9 X% w' `5 C, r; E$ d
Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766
) L, s1 }* c7 E# |' i -------------------------------------------------------------------------
8 y; J7 B& W0 ]1 @, O Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707
+ E/ _* x( D6 n+ E -------------------------------------------------------------------------
% ~& ~& O0 Q: E6 ~$ A Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500, g- _4 l+ ? t0 g, F
-------------------------------------------------------------------------/ I. h8 e) n- S4 i3 ]
Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389/ ^4 W2 d3 T- b- U8 P! J, t
-------------------------------------------------------------------------0 H- b- {6 f/ k" s- b$ i( ~) g& C
Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714
. L6 e+ W* ]* Y -------------------------------------------------------------------------
, u1 s% f8 I7 S* T1 q Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,5002 B$ e8 G7 a! j( Y2 d5 O
-------------------------------------------------------------------------- a/ z2 a4 b; c1 r: G4 l
Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000& C+ I+ J2 G# N- e, i* e* _
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
5 J2 l+ M+ p" u$ ]& ? National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860
9 l! v& z& s0 H! W3 g -------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 K( _# H, n- c* p V6 I7 G3 S( K. w; E9 a# B/ Q& ]3 G0 h4 u2 \
-------------------------------------------------------------5 y; l( r. v' r9 f. T
Standard Condominium/ r$ q+ M. z* X& G: f9 X
-------------------------------------------------------------& g9 U1 r% Z% `+ p$ b* R1 V
2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo, \: } \: v, |+ c; a9 R4 A8 p
Market % Change Average Average % Change
, z3 B2 k W4 t5 `5 w -------------------------------------------------------------
' g$ {( K( M( H: j Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%" l- U. `; @. w! r, ]
-------------------------------------------------------------
1 t5 C r# m% {+ U3 ~- H$ L Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%2 r2 Q8 P w% |# v$ d) o3 |
-------------------------------------------------------------
* a0 r+ H' w4 T! Q Moncton 4.9% - - N/A
1 u: n" h5 U$ F- Z$ P8 ~ ------------------------------------------------------------- s* I7 V3 ~1 J2 ]4 ]" N! u$ c
Saint John N/A - - N/A
* m2 C7 B* z/ ^6 K. q6 L -------------------------------------------------------------$ d+ N/ J+ q/ \9 F
St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%
; ^- K$ U U: K, G) J4 t. k+ F' s -------------------------------------------------------------; Q e2 a1 D: x6 \% v$ w7 g# h
Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%
! l- p, p7 `9 f0 Q( s- G9 d( ] -------------------------------------------------------------* ]7 O6 o% p' g/ _) p( G! I( P
Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%
3 P5 S$ X- f. G1 h3 V3 O, { -------------------------------------------------------------/ N" X; a6 |2 q3 V. M) H2 T
Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%, q+ R' P5 @ A m( y) d8 \
-------------------------------------------------------------/ s0 ^( d1 t( _, d% y
Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%( H) q- ?8 _3 P P/ ?0 K) g
-------------------------------------------------------------: L5 G4 h/ ?1 }& Q
Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%& q# m* c9 |% N4 l8 x4 w
-------------------------------------------------------------
. x' Q0 r9 Y4 o7 s: R% C0 e. x- u Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%( l8 ?6 G! H. W0 h( j" b
-------------------------------------------------------------
5 J1 U& _/ r! |8 q* I+ x3 x T, c Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%
. K' O! ?9 N' l, H* W6 U; r -------------------------------------------------------------3 C; J* N/ l: ^, o. ?
Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%
l# l: S' d4 g8 z0 v3 q -------------------------------------------------------------4 a; d* r0 X0 g
Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%! D" X( N$ p( A1 B
-------------------------------------------------------------
, G1 E# r% y; Z% R1 q* N' } Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%
% J7 \ m5 L! {9 H( P -------------------------------------------------------------; \# Y) V8 t3 L$ w a5 \1 ]
National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%
+ L* G+ D- J- H5 o( f1 p# i -------------------------------------------------------------( E3 N3 d9 p( c7 H$ i
>>9 ~" z X, S" g' f
6 h1 B: \% k% U8 k* l
Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
, G& u" I) Y" A. X# G' D+ ein the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint! N) y& d' ? n; k8 v3 J, e) M) f3 |
John and Victoria.9 D, Y$ j+ S$ h
% c) X; j6 k$ n/ N
The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
# T' b# @: o2 G f6 T! t6 j- icomprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of# ^2 ?. S9 h0 D8 M
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
- {2 n2 R' ^. Ereferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
8 k6 u+ y) l# B d* atrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities) Z# u' k( ?! H- ^$ X. I
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is" n z8 J$ O9 n6 g) F+ O
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
+ H8 u3 g+ ]! K; g. x! yfigures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
4 z; M0 ]% U, k: Q" B- x T. Sversion of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
z$ N/ c! }7 [5 I5 G6 |November 15, 2006.
0 k4 E+ I/ D/ G$ d) q Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of! l) v8 K2 @; H" t: Y
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge. o, t' ?" L I5 F3 w- s
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is2 S& |# M5 c3 p
available for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|