埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2747|回复: 0

关于 邮购是否免税的问题 退税表 D6-2-6

[复制链接]
鲜花(2) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2011-9-29 22:42 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Memorandum D6-2-6Refund of Duties and Taxes on Non-Commercial Importations$ H" g! ~/ E$ k& ?
上面说 非商业 进口 可以免关税?1 m' M1 M$ H/ I: i" F4 E8 [: u
# g- A( t( t$ t" T1 r, F5 f/ _
8 W2 h6 k4 {1 e1 B( m8 T) `
: t: F+ g1 D% d' [
http://www.cbsa-asfc.gc.ca/publications/forms-formulaires/b2g.pdf
' w  ?, `% [+ L( h% ?/ |' H" ~* ?* g' n& L! |, g8 A" h

2 g9 _* p& x* G- M1 i! R* o4 YRefund Requests8 j7 N; Y3 n) b7 \) P9 P
74. (1) Subject to this section, section 75 and any regulations made under section 81, a person who$ v* D/ I! X7 V. _. L3 e
paid duties on any imported goods may, in accordance with subsection (3), apply for a refund of all or part3 q2 X/ S- S. u
of those duties, and the Minister may grant to that person a refund of all or part of those duties, if9 F" D7 d4 W1 V/ A+ A
(a) they have suffered damage, deterioration or destruction at any time from the time of shipment to
. Q0 L  K$ W. xCanada to the time of release;2 d. B! a4 X$ q
(b) the quantity released is less than the quantity in respect of which duties were paid;* B; k$ v: E# X
(c) they are of a quality inferior to that in respect of which duties were paid;
) Q6 F% ^7 g- j1 W7 c& T9 c(c.1) the goods were exported from a NAFTA country or from Chile but no claim for preferential- ~4 _& o4 r! S9 J
tariff treatment under NAFTA or no claim for preferential tariff treatment under the CCFTA, as the
' E' x- r' _- ]* H. P+ ]- h1 Gcase may be, was made in respect of those goods at the time they were accounted for under
8 N0 x- @; z7 s$ m& Rsubsection 32(1), (3) or (5);
$ @7 ^1 j3 s- X2 v4 j. [! }$ V3
' V5 y/ r( h* T. o. ?& i(c.11) the goods were imported from Israel or another CIFTA beneficiary but no claim for
/ d8 c/ W- N/ C- T1 W1 z& npreferential tariff treatment under CIFTA was made in respect of those goods at the time they are
1 R7 w* i2 C5 P/ Raccounted for under subsection 32(1), (3) or (5);" e- P/ v+ g+ Z$ d/ G. a
(d) the calculation of duties owing was based on a clerical, typographical or similar error;; X4 H: x. b+ }+ j/ y" r
(e) the duties were paid or overpaid as a result of an error in the determination under subsection 58(2)
. _. `. H5 n5 X6 ]- f+ vof origin (other than in the circumstances described in paragraph (c.1) or (c.11), tariff classification or: D# X' \' _3 o( d- [
value for duty in respect of the goods and the determination has not been the subject of a decision
+ R2 M; w. b- S1 E( i( `1 iunder any of sections 59 to 61;
2 [* m% G# J7 A- B(f) [not applicable to non-commercial goods];
& P) @) ~  G' }7 ~( @8 s5 N(g) the duties were overpaid or paid in error for any reason that may be prescribed.
( k* M1 y1 F2 L(1.1) The granting of a refund under paragraph (1) (c.1), (c.11), or (e) or (f), if the refund is based
9 d; Y1 T8 q6 L; Ron tariff classification, value for duty or origin under paragraph (1)(g) is to be treated for the purposes of
  t5 y, ]) F: ]- t6 a3 Cthis Act, other than section 66, as if it were a re-determination made under paragraph 59 (1)(a)., L: U7 f7 q  O8 J6 c
(2) No refund shall be granted under any of the paragraphs 1(a) to (c) and (d) in respect of a claim, f$ h& v2 R6 z; X& m
unless written notice of the claim and the reason for it is given to an officer within the prescribed time.
* \+ B  D* w$ a  |9 C0 R(3) No refund shall be granted under subsection (1) in respect of a claim unless
1 H) d8 }5 v: m) D! k(a) the person making the claim affords an officer reasonable opportunity to examine the goods in
+ x" V0 u; n0 W8 Q( Irespect of which the claim is made or otherwise verify the reason for the claim; and
1 e2 {% a0 [) j: s8 w(b) an application for the refund, including such evidence in support of the application as may be) d' B. L' y# X9 k
prescribed, is made to an officer in the prescribed manner and in the prescribed form containing the# e. \$ Y8 I4 K6 C: @/ G8 p
prescribed information within8 y9 K5 f  N  M4 w, ^1 I$ U+ }
(i) in the case of an application for a refund under paragraph (1)(a), (b), (c), (c.11), (d), (e), (f)
# s6 f4 K3 e# r/ l! K: U2 aor (g), four years after the goods are accounted for under subsection 32 (1), (3) or (5), and7 }3 H  j% x' K6 c
(ii) in the case of an application for a refund under paragraph (1)(c.1), one year after the goods
* m* D% M2 L9 g$ D+ R/ E8 y$ r( s) mwere accounted for under subsection 32(1), (3) or (5) or such longer period as may be prescribed.6 c& E; v8 f$ _# m- p3 q
(4) A denial of an application for a refund of duties paid on goods is to be treated for the purposes of. D. U3 g4 Y1 q9 q; ~
this Act as if it were a re-determination under paragraph 59(1)(a) if2 j6 T* T" R) ]. T
(a) the application is for a refund under paragraph (1)(c.1) or (c.11) and the application is denied
" N) \- u7 n9 U2 r4 Fbecause at the time the goods were accounted for under subsection 32(1), (3) or (5), they were not" V+ H0 w  ?) T2 Z
eligible for preferential tariff treatment under a free trade agreement; or
; S4 z# z" F+ F, y0 J(b) the application is for a refund under paragraph (1)(e), (f) or (g) and the application is denied% L# u8 H3 t  v, o9 ]
because the origin, tariff classification or value for duty of the goods as claimed in the application is6 G% F' C, l  x# m
incorrect.7 R( n/ I9 k6 w- y
(5) For greater certainty, a denial of an application for a refund under paragraph (1)(c.1), (c.11), (e),
# Z# s' C+ P8 G' O4 x$ {/ a$ S/ Y(f) or (g) on the basis that complete or accurate documentation has not been provided, or on any ground
7 L2 W( b1 Y' |4 S& {0 fother than the ground specified in subsection (4), is not to be treated for the purposes of this Act as if it
4 G/ @$ {2 ?" q/ b, Xwere a re-determination under this Act of origin, tariff classification or value for duty.
4 B' |$ K% l6 O' n/ a. e# P2 K# Q7 m; v% g1 ~' i
这到底是说可以还是不可以啊?
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-6-3 05:16 , Processed in 0.121343 second(s), 9 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表