 鲜花( 2)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Memorandum D6-2-6Refund of Duties and Taxes on Non-Commercial Importations: N/ U O- s w' b1 s
上面说 非商业 进口 可以免关税?
6 w: U v$ T/ u! y; O& t, |( o: s: s% ?: t: r9 O v
0 m; c/ d( I2 K, i7 S
L0 @( g$ |3 \2 e" lhttp://www.cbsa-asfc.gc.ca/publications/forms-formulaires/b2g.pdf
* g3 J# G5 ~- j: |8 r/ _# z, t' u& a9 \
5 s0 c& I% l0 LRefund Requests! m, _6 v4 l; C/ a/ v. V+ q
74. (1) Subject to this section, section 75 and any regulations made under section 81, a person who; h% K5 W1 {- Q( j/ u+ k
paid duties on any imported goods may, in accordance with subsection (3), apply for a refund of all or part9 H7 Y; X) B7 _' Y5 W
of those duties, and the Minister may grant to that person a refund of all or part of those duties, if' B# q$ P/ {% L7 T, l9 n+ L% }5 g
(a) they have suffered damage, deterioration or destruction at any time from the time of shipment to
1 p! Y- F" Q) i( x) r5 tCanada to the time of release;
- M, U e o+ y3 G _" n7 V6 Q8 x(b) the quantity released is less than the quantity in respect of which duties were paid;& C1 R: B3 d# }+ x% a0 I$ H( H
(c) they are of a quality inferior to that in respect of which duties were paid;9 M8 j3 ~; s) T7 L; N6 `
(c.1) the goods were exported from a NAFTA country or from Chile but no claim for preferential9 X" M# }* N6 z! R
tariff treatment under NAFTA or no claim for preferential tariff treatment under the CCFTA, as the. U1 J, Y8 U7 x5 a5 L- `
case may be, was made in respect of those goods at the time they were accounted for under
( _( o) D6 q' ?4 U4 D( V% ksubsection 32(1), (3) or (5);% r, K @' x" ?# @7 o- z9 j( k
3
8 w% n2 I$ Z1 ~& L! i% f(c.11) the goods were imported from Israel or another CIFTA beneficiary but no claim for
- d% Y! B" e$ l9 jpreferential tariff treatment under CIFTA was made in respect of those goods at the time they are; v' o# T( w: y7 B6 ?
accounted for under subsection 32(1), (3) or (5);& f7 U# X7 l" W. ^0 d1 }
(d) the calculation of duties owing was based on a clerical, typographical or similar error;) E' @5 ?8 _1 G2 e. H
(e) the duties were paid or overpaid as a result of an error in the determination under subsection 58(2)
5 R# k" ]+ b" _ k- Uof origin (other than in the circumstances described in paragraph (c.1) or (c.11), tariff classification or! c6 Z0 [6 ?' V- `# j
value for duty in respect of the goods and the determination has not been the subject of a decision
9 ` v$ r8 S) Qunder any of sections 59 to 61;% } ?4 D+ t4 E' v$ @3 V* ^
(f) [not applicable to non-commercial goods];/ K b0 v* F9 e/ T2 i
(g) the duties were overpaid or paid in error for any reason that may be prescribed.
6 T! p# \. A1 n8 @& g% z, `(1.1) The granting of a refund under paragraph (1) (c.1), (c.11), or (e) or (f), if the refund is based: u! {6 t" z7 z( ^
on tariff classification, value for duty or origin under paragraph (1)(g) is to be treated for the purposes of
& Y+ x. }7 _) [2 @this Act, other than section 66, as if it were a re-determination made under paragraph 59 (1)(a).
0 b/ @2 Q3 l- `1 @(2) No refund shall be granted under any of the paragraphs 1(a) to (c) and (d) in respect of a claim7 c! S7 v6 ^1 a: [( V
unless written notice of the claim and the reason for it is given to an officer within the prescribed time.
7 Q- E( o& K& i* L. }7 t(3) No refund shall be granted under subsection (1) in respect of a claim unless: ]0 f# w5 Y3 U; x5 V; u
(a) the person making the claim affords an officer reasonable opportunity to examine the goods in2 ^2 l& x: b+ x
respect of which the claim is made or otherwise verify the reason for the claim; and
, p, _$ ]9 g, S ^" R1 d- ^+ r(b) an application for the refund, including such evidence in support of the application as may be
+ L) G: W( i& A+ l4 hprescribed, is made to an officer in the prescribed manner and in the prescribed form containing the
; M3 t% Y; {: _. iprescribed information within5 Z1 c; l( G+ e( L( T5 R2 }
(i) in the case of an application for a refund under paragraph (1)(a), (b), (c), (c.11), (d), (e), (f)
N+ k- I$ f$ D* Q; d7 vor (g), four years after the goods are accounted for under subsection 32 (1), (3) or (5), and
0 K" D4 M) F- [3 M5 M(ii) in the case of an application for a refund under paragraph (1)(c.1), one year after the goods
3 ]/ T: G) l' ]2 m! twere accounted for under subsection 32(1), (3) or (5) or such longer period as may be prescribed.4 T) W% ~ d" j: }; ]: ~% u, `
(4) A denial of an application for a refund of duties paid on goods is to be treated for the purposes of& t _) A1 ~3 O- h
this Act as if it were a re-determination under paragraph 59(1)(a) if$ d% o! p+ P8 B% k( `
(a) the application is for a refund under paragraph (1)(c.1) or (c.11) and the application is denied
+ R3 {4 ^* u: ` {2 h/ C+ e6 ]because at the time the goods were accounted for under subsection 32(1), (3) or (5), they were not0 @4 M" g' x+ O7 Y& C9 ?
eligible for preferential tariff treatment under a free trade agreement; or ?; e0 l( l2 F- @" Q7 F
(b) the application is for a refund under paragraph (1)(e), (f) or (g) and the application is denied
* A* c j. S! O H9 r# b. j0 kbecause the origin, tariff classification or value for duty of the goods as claimed in the application is
7 Z6 a0 ~4 x5 D8 P! Aincorrect., E' m+ k' V: W
(5) For greater certainty, a denial of an application for a refund under paragraph (1)(c.1), (c.11), (e), S8 t) u/ f3 y8 C. r& `# K# q
(f) or (g) on the basis that complete or accurate documentation has not been provided, or on any ground; I; c2 @* T. @+ o, s# V0 f* i8 {
other than the ground specified in subsection (4), is not to be treated for the purposes of this Act as if it
! o- P! p2 H2 L" Z6 g: hwere a re-determination under this Act of origin, tariff classification or value for duty.+ C5 r( q' q, N0 Q$ d/ v* F1 K
6 J% M$ C6 N8 I
这到底是说可以还是不可以啊? |
|