埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 3063|回复: 0

关于 邮购是否免税的问题 退税表 D6-2-6

[复制链接]
鲜花(2) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2011-9-29 22:42 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Memorandum D6-2-6Refund of Duties and Taxes on Non-Commercial Importations
* I1 L! p. }$ @! n5 C上面说 非商业 进口 可以免关税?
, ^, Y" l  Q8 u' O9 |! @. v* {& w. R3 X* i2 i" _9 J

' Z# j8 q' E3 L9 ~
- e* k: ]) w9 A2 s/ w$ Q
http://www.cbsa-asfc.gc.ca/publications/forms-formulaires/b2g.pdf
! y! @" M4 Z; A4 Q$ n( V& M2 _
1 c# \& f, E2 g; P$ f
+ m% q$ H4 I& S% \Refund Requests' a1 ^8 _8 I7 V- i
74. (1) Subject to this section, section 75 and any regulations made under section 81, a person who, v8 g* l* e4 S5 T6 l0 E5 v' q
paid duties on any imported goods may, in accordance with subsection (3), apply for a refund of all or part1 {. {$ ]5 N9 S+ E- |
of those duties, and the Minister may grant to that person a refund of all or part of those duties, if
* p7 S% g3 f6 n" |( l1 R' h$ U(a) they have suffered damage, deterioration or destruction at any time from the time of shipment to
3 m1 a+ f' ]) v6 kCanada to the time of release;
% ]/ Y1 G# z* b1 x5 G(b) the quantity released is less than the quantity in respect of which duties were paid;, s$ ~& F0 X0 p# g' a' U
(c) they are of a quality inferior to that in respect of which duties were paid;
% ?9 h) Q3 \6 {. r# O- @) Q% F(c.1) the goods were exported from a NAFTA country or from Chile but no claim for preferential
( T& W' p# i4 X) Atariff treatment under NAFTA or no claim for preferential tariff treatment under the CCFTA, as the# ~+ l) Q& ?6 p, M# ]' p0 Z7 e5 M
case may be, was made in respect of those goods at the time they were accounted for under7 N" S2 A7 K1 Q0 c/ @7 b
subsection 32(1), (3) or (5);
9 S# M% w2 e+ }8 z  I' q) F8 E3) N" l) Z1 I! A5 r
(c.11) the goods were imported from Israel or another CIFTA beneficiary but no claim for
; L+ d6 [! [  ~+ ypreferential tariff treatment under CIFTA was made in respect of those goods at the time they are
, p* y  R/ H" I! ^accounted for under subsection 32(1), (3) or (5);
) Q6 r2 v& H( I( u0 O% Z, m' h9 I( S(d) the calculation of duties owing was based on a clerical, typographical or similar error;  X" Z. W9 C8 z' b* B
(e) the duties were paid or overpaid as a result of an error in the determination under subsection 58(2)( p9 h# W# g& E8 _5 [
of origin (other than in the circumstances described in paragraph (c.1) or (c.11), tariff classification or
2 @" [3 D) j3 }+ ovalue for duty in respect of the goods and the determination has not been the subject of a decision8 I/ e, H* H- c  E
under any of sections 59 to 61;( R& ^5 {1 U6 i. W, t
(f) [not applicable to non-commercial goods];
3 z) j9 Z) Q& ]  |; w  s' F. W(g) the duties were overpaid or paid in error for any reason that may be prescribed.! H: c4 O+ M6 R0 }* ]  J) j
(1.1) The granting of a refund under paragraph (1) (c.1), (c.11), or (e) or (f), if the refund is based1 F% v* s& X# O$ j, e' ]
on tariff classification, value for duty or origin under paragraph (1)(g) is to be treated for the purposes of
0 i7 \( m! D4 Hthis Act, other than section 66, as if it were a re-determination made under paragraph 59 (1)(a).) g" f9 `8 m% d- T! E+ G
(2) No refund shall be granted under any of the paragraphs 1(a) to (c) and (d) in respect of a claim
0 h& u4 i5 l+ m3 r0 f( O& cunless written notice of the claim and the reason for it is given to an officer within the prescribed time.
) c: J5 i% Q8 e1 P1 H(3) No refund shall be granted under subsection (1) in respect of a claim unless8 k: @) H2 ^7 x% J
(a) the person making the claim affords an officer reasonable opportunity to examine the goods in$ B  ?. d! G0 L
respect of which the claim is made or otherwise verify the reason for the claim; and
- j4 k( I3 r+ ^- P2 _9 X(b) an application for the refund, including such evidence in support of the application as may be
* [9 r3 n) {6 k' p+ uprescribed, is made to an officer in the prescribed manner and in the prescribed form containing the5 `# m! J, {- S9 L9 K
prescribed information within& @- |& }' W1 K. H9 v, A
(i) in the case of an application for a refund under paragraph (1)(a), (b), (c), (c.11), (d), (e), (f)1 e$ B9 o$ d" q, H+ K
or (g), four years after the goods are accounted for under subsection 32 (1), (3) or (5), and
: v9 j6 {7 u. i5 [) K/ c% c; {(ii) in the case of an application for a refund under paragraph (1)(c.1), one year after the goods9 w. F! }" l. Q( {3 N" B6 D3 G
were accounted for under subsection 32(1), (3) or (5) or such longer period as may be prescribed.  N* Y! `( E' S8 ]
(4) A denial of an application for a refund of duties paid on goods is to be treated for the purposes of
  n; d  |" u  l8 m! nthis Act as if it were a re-determination under paragraph 59(1)(a) if
0 o1 d" V" }( u/ d8 D(a) the application is for a refund under paragraph (1)(c.1) or (c.11) and the application is denied9 n0 G0 r9 m0 A
because at the time the goods were accounted for under subsection 32(1), (3) or (5), they were not! P. v& g, g/ F$ _) U
eligible for preferential tariff treatment under a free trade agreement; or9 I/ h6 x8 T$ s$ {2 s
(b) the application is for a refund under paragraph (1)(e), (f) or (g) and the application is denied
% B. z/ C' b& c% r2 ebecause the origin, tariff classification or value for duty of the goods as claimed in the application is
6 X, N( E  r% ?+ @* M. f, wincorrect.9 e5 `# u; Z" x( g
(5) For greater certainty, a denial of an application for a refund under paragraph (1)(c.1), (c.11), (e),) |6 u  |& n9 {% v: ~  D2 t( \
(f) or (g) on the basis that complete or accurate documentation has not been provided, or on any ground
5 y! q* _7 Y2 E9 Dother than the ground specified in subsection (4), is not to be treated for the purposes of this Act as if it8 r, }0 y/ M; K! J# t8 l
were a re-determination under this Act of origin, tariff classification or value for duty.
4 p4 F8 s( `' y' V  _) g3 }7 w4 t5 R+ U5 v
这到底是说可以还是不可以啊?
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-7-8 19:17 , Processed in 0.157707 second(s), 9 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表