埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 3185|回复: 0

关于 邮购是否免税的问题 退税表 D6-2-6

[复制链接]
鲜花(2) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2011-9-29 22:42 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Memorandum D6-2-6Refund of Duties and Taxes on Non-Commercial Importations3 f2 g8 v1 u4 {" W9 f/ ?
上面说 非商业 进口 可以免关税?
" t! ]- d# N6 h6 z2 a2 }! I6 }7 e, f4 R* P
, q' L2 M! D& P) C2 L

0 ^/ H1 f3 Y4 `: `% G% Thttp://www.cbsa-asfc.gc.ca/publications/forms-formulaires/b2g.pdf0 q! y& B1 n7 U) v% P1 W( ^& y

! `" d* I$ X$ j* O0 X! ]$ e
) a, c5 K3 V+ k, u* i) }, {Refund Requests
9 a' q6 L2 ]& A' f74. (1) Subject to this section, section 75 and any regulations made under section 81, a person who' c# n$ u, ?. w( C) o4 ~
paid duties on any imported goods may, in accordance with subsection (3), apply for a refund of all or part' N0 p0 L- m) n0 a, j: }% D' K0 Q
of those duties, and the Minister may grant to that person a refund of all or part of those duties, if
3 ?! D5 |1 U  }(a) they have suffered damage, deterioration or destruction at any time from the time of shipment to4 k. g: @; v) H8 }
Canada to the time of release;! ~' @. D5 k1 k, E& I. ~6 O8 c
(b) the quantity released is less than the quantity in respect of which duties were paid;; [' I2 q5 Q$ r) |/ Q7 t5 p+ q6 U
(c) they are of a quality inferior to that in respect of which duties were paid;
  ^9 O0 \  w5 A6 v5 e(c.1) the goods were exported from a NAFTA country or from Chile but no claim for preferential  X  X9 b* A+ H: ^2 u) F+ |
tariff treatment under NAFTA or no claim for preferential tariff treatment under the CCFTA, as the9 M- Y8 L" e7 y0 l6 `
case may be, was made in respect of those goods at the time they were accounted for under
+ f9 r4 T6 |5 a( zsubsection 32(1), (3) or (5);$ y/ n& J% E( K/ m2 l: c, a
3
  S1 s6 a( J9 r5 i6 O2 G3 m' j(c.11) the goods were imported from Israel or another CIFTA beneficiary but no claim for: Z6 k+ j; I! N1 I8 f
preferential tariff treatment under CIFTA was made in respect of those goods at the time they are
1 y* Z6 K9 I* }# J, o1 caccounted for under subsection 32(1), (3) or (5);
$ x  R, j4 P2 }4 Y(d) the calculation of duties owing was based on a clerical, typographical or similar error;
; Z4 H4 ?3 q5 o* |  L(e) the duties were paid or overpaid as a result of an error in the determination under subsection 58(2)
8 R" [  Y6 Z; L# dof origin (other than in the circumstances described in paragraph (c.1) or (c.11), tariff classification or
) j! W. L3 T, `; k" ~6 Nvalue for duty in respect of the goods and the determination has not been the subject of a decision# @, C8 J% Y- h! d, G4 a& @
under any of sections 59 to 61;
* n! D/ ~/ R' A; V(f) [not applicable to non-commercial goods];( ~) l6 x$ y" q. p
(g) the duties were overpaid or paid in error for any reason that may be prescribed./ H# |; ?, ~4 X2 I8 a& u
(1.1) The granting of a refund under paragraph (1) (c.1), (c.11), or (e) or (f), if the refund is based
% D: x2 Z  m+ E" y9 con tariff classification, value for duty or origin under paragraph (1)(g) is to be treated for the purposes of
& ~% g9 t5 D: f/ c3 Athis Act, other than section 66, as if it were a re-determination made under paragraph 59 (1)(a).2 i. M; p! ~- C: T/ E. E
(2) No refund shall be granted under any of the paragraphs 1(a) to (c) and (d) in respect of a claim' A6 |9 ^) e' D+ j
unless written notice of the claim and the reason for it is given to an officer within the prescribed time.
- o% z* O; x4 d3 D(3) No refund shall be granted under subsection (1) in respect of a claim unless: T+ z0 n8 T) j+ E5 s8 u
(a) the person making the claim affords an officer reasonable opportunity to examine the goods in
# ]& |  B. W' m2 W# N9 w. brespect of which the claim is made or otherwise verify the reason for the claim; and
6 R5 ?* c, {. P3 y(b) an application for the refund, including such evidence in support of the application as may be
; _0 J) F9 f) y" t2 N6 Zprescribed, is made to an officer in the prescribed manner and in the prescribed form containing the9 ]* e8 y* u8 U* Z
prescribed information within
, I# o, C( l, B$ B9 O(i) in the case of an application for a refund under paragraph (1)(a), (b), (c), (c.11), (d), (e), (f). s3 o5 s  l  D+ L" v- F3 p$ B& O& q# \
or (g), four years after the goods are accounted for under subsection 32 (1), (3) or (5), and$ {9 E& x* N+ v, h$ u" b5 }
(ii) in the case of an application for a refund under paragraph (1)(c.1), one year after the goods
: v& a9 |5 Y* p  C: hwere accounted for under subsection 32(1), (3) or (5) or such longer period as may be prescribed.7 f& \+ M# x( y
(4) A denial of an application for a refund of duties paid on goods is to be treated for the purposes of! B0 R6 c$ y4 P" t- a3 e. K* z
this Act as if it were a re-determination under paragraph 59(1)(a) if
/ }1 K7 T0 i7 K(a) the application is for a refund under paragraph (1)(c.1) or (c.11) and the application is denied6 g6 g  P# v! `; A& a/ V+ Q' D
because at the time the goods were accounted for under subsection 32(1), (3) or (5), they were not
' _0 ^, y: r5 t. Eeligible for preferential tariff treatment under a free trade agreement; or
7 L5 f' Y" ]2 P1 P(b) the application is for a refund under paragraph (1)(e), (f) or (g) and the application is denied
7 k0 y& R& B/ G6 z' abecause the origin, tariff classification or value for duty of the goods as claimed in the application is. J: T2 u! ?; t
incorrect.
; b. R0 W4 Z7 A- E$ l(5) For greater certainty, a denial of an application for a refund under paragraph (1)(c.1), (c.11), (e),- U: x' u# x% `4 P8 q# v; ~
(f) or (g) on the basis that complete or accurate documentation has not been provided, or on any ground
! e+ c' {: O6 T/ A4 oother than the ground specified in subsection (4), is not to be treated for the purposes of this Act as if it! D8 W  ]9 u2 K) N" K3 S
were a re-determination under this Act of origin, tariff classification or value for duty.* ^# T6 H# a! W: O- Z

$ p0 j/ K! E" G* l2 x1 W这到底是说可以还是不可以啊?
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-7-22 23:38 , Processed in 0.191818 second(s), 11 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表