埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2591|回复: 0

关于 邮购是否免税的问题 退税表 D6-2-6

[复制链接]
鲜花(2) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2011-9-29 22:42 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Memorandum D6-2-6Refund of Duties and Taxes on Non-Commercial Importations
( Q. G$ H+ t: `7 m. g上面说 非商业 进口 可以免关税?6 Y" j* o7 i; W
2 Z1 t+ x' Y/ N$ P
1 k5 q( B9 s  `- q
6 f3 }8 I$ D# f: S. i
http://www.cbsa-asfc.gc.ca/publications/forms-formulaires/b2g.pdf
5 |9 K1 K. Z& Z8 w* }) r% c: x' x5 m0 B+ g5 ?( c

$ H; q' ]3 t; d$ oRefund Requests
, F2 k3 C0 l- K3 Y  F* s74. (1) Subject to this section, section 75 and any regulations made under section 81, a person who% j1 ]" N( I1 ]2 Y
paid duties on any imported goods may, in accordance with subsection (3), apply for a refund of all or part) X/ v$ ^# j6 ^) ~
of those duties, and the Minister may grant to that person a refund of all or part of those duties, if
  V; C" v  B3 \(a) they have suffered damage, deterioration or destruction at any time from the time of shipment to7 j$ H4 F$ w% I; E$ I
Canada to the time of release;
$ W" Q- j0 f! @( Y(b) the quantity released is less than the quantity in respect of which duties were paid;
% X* v, T3 Z5 G( n, C- D(c) they are of a quality inferior to that in respect of which duties were paid;
- m6 H( _/ P/ ?) n  F; c(c.1) the goods were exported from a NAFTA country or from Chile but no claim for preferential: {6 c4 M6 i! V
tariff treatment under NAFTA or no claim for preferential tariff treatment under the CCFTA, as the
% U% z* S5 I( e6 X# I, z6 p4 j" Kcase may be, was made in respect of those goods at the time they were accounted for under
0 l- V$ W. n6 m+ @& @5 x3 ysubsection 32(1), (3) or (5);1 v+ q: N1 x! `. _. B+ t0 x  l# ]
30 {* z- |. s2 F* ^6 G
(c.11) the goods were imported from Israel or another CIFTA beneficiary but no claim for
% Q6 g+ Z" Y7 w1 apreferential tariff treatment under CIFTA was made in respect of those goods at the time they are
$ R* h+ d. }* V/ D4 {7 R6 m! g! G& v& Caccounted for under subsection 32(1), (3) or (5);
" w# V( g1 y/ A  S  y$ P(d) the calculation of duties owing was based on a clerical, typographical or similar error;1 ~* ^5 V& M+ c5 V2 I% ?" w, U- a
(e) the duties were paid or overpaid as a result of an error in the determination under subsection 58(2)
  n! u2 W3 g" C( C& `of origin (other than in the circumstances described in paragraph (c.1) or (c.11), tariff classification or/ w& G9 g" @: V/ W" x. H# }* {
value for duty in respect of the goods and the determination has not been the subject of a decision- F6 ~+ g* B; N
under any of sections 59 to 61;
; p1 P- W  t! S% G6 e6 Y; \(f) [not applicable to non-commercial goods];5 X: L( m0 W& u3 d2 D
(g) the duties were overpaid or paid in error for any reason that may be prescribed.4 e, x" n& w5 V' \
(1.1) The granting of a refund under paragraph (1) (c.1), (c.11), or (e) or (f), if the refund is based' V- }2 \& p4 e: J: z9 i
on tariff classification, value for duty or origin under paragraph (1)(g) is to be treated for the purposes of
9 A: _9 q6 F3 l; `9 [3 Tthis Act, other than section 66, as if it were a re-determination made under paragraph 59 (1)(a).
, w. N: Z& d" }& s; d' E% Q/ U(2) No refund shall be granted under any of the paragraphs 1(a) to (c) and (d) in respect of a claim5 S# N* a  M9 [- U3 b, i3 ^& D0 x
unless written notice of the claim and the reason for it is given to an officer within the prescribed time.
. E- p* i6 g% _7 k* Z* w& r0 {$ T(3) No refund shall be granted under subsection (1) in respect of a claim unless/ e  Q- f) O& a/ f! u. u
(a) the person making the claim affords an officer reasonable opportunity to examine the goods in
2 I2 R' |8 U- Rrespect of which the claim is made or otherwise verify the reason for the claim; and8 N3 K  I% |7 f' l. c
(b) an application for the refund, including such evidence in support of the application as may be
5 x/ S. N5 G3 z. ]( o9 [3 jprescribed, is made to an officer in the prescribed manner and in the prescribed form containing the& q$ g5 h" m* j& J1 @
prescribed information within
. ^2 c) B- W1 h* s3 l2 u(i) in the case of an application for a refund under paragraph (1)(a), (b), (c), (c.11), (d), (e), (f), K' x6 t- Z. _
or (g), four years after the goods are accounted for under subsection 32 (1), (3) or (5), and5 g/ s0 y% m: y
(ii) in the case of an application for a refund under paragraph (1)(c.1), one year after the goods
& z# E; x" m; x) b4 z8 A, iwere accounted for under subsection 32(1), (3) or (5) or such longer period as may be prescribed.5 T# K( P7 A. ?( H
(4) A denial of an application for a refund of duties paid on goods is to be treated for the purposes of5 |' |# }) v2 I2 s9 Q
this Act as if it were a re-determination under paragraph 59(1)(a) if
. D! L$ n9 H% i& @7 [(a) the application is for a refund under paragraph (1)(c.1) or (c.11) and the application is denied9 @9 N5 |! h7 O
because at the time the goods were accounted for under subsection 32(1), (3) or (5), they were not
  U; m& v2 y6 G% Weligible for preferential tariff treatment under a free trade agreement; or& E9 B  f( k8 @3 v9 C' p% a2 I, H
(b) the application is for a refund under paragraph (1)(e), (f) or (g) and the application is denied+ S$ x4 u" A- q4 Q; `3 q
because the origin, tariff classification or value for duty of the goods as claimed in the application is2 ]# z5 J' x/ D( |+ ~) W
incorrect.
* k/ o4 S0 R3 `1 J& M; F4 m8 J' n(5) For greater certainty, a denial of an application for a refund under paragraph (1)(c.1), (c.11), (e),
" H3 u' H( {8 k1 f0 g1 F(f) or (g) on the basis that complete or accurate documentation has not been provided, or on any ground8 g* P( Z" N/ E) K% D
other than the ground specified in subsection (4), is not to be treated for the purposes of this Act as if it: O5 b! K  {, W; ~3 B7 z
were a re-determination under this Act of origin, tariff classification or value for duty.
* I3 O, `! n/ i
2 c6 X- F# j" _0 S) l这到底是说可以还是不可以啊?
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-5-5 20:52 , Processed in 0.328124 second(s), 10 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表