埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 3413|回复: 0

关于 邮购是否免税的问题 退税表 D6-2-6

[复制链接]
鲜花(2) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2011-9-29 22:42 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Memorandum D6-2-6Refund of Duties and Taxes on Non-Commercial Importations
" n; f5 j' C4 I, f( M上面说 非商业 进口 可以免关税?" `, {# M& e- R$ j* T
) F# D% c9 e; B- j; q
( i- f" d9 Y8 X- c

9 t) g/ k7 N0 Qhttp://www.cbsa-asfc.gc.ca/publications/forms-formulaires/b2g.pdf& L5 q& ^* B# K7 |% p: w9 P
8 x. y6 m+ e* A
4 E3 d! o& o" ^3 R' \- q
Refund Requests
+ O( e0 ]/ P$ w74. (1) Subject to this section, section 75 and any regulations made under section 81, a person who
* f% ]7 D- B9 M# fpaid duties on any imported goods may, in accordance with subsection (3), apply for a refund of all or part- i# @, L7 `; k% K; ]* j; d9 r
of those duties, and the Minister may grant to that person a refund of all or part of those duties, if
5 p4 ]$ [5 p) T: H(a) they have suffered damage, deterioration or destruction at any time from the time of shipment to
) n& Q5 A! |8 g% j3 i- ], J7 RCanada to the time of release;
( F3 a3 D  S2 s(b) the quantity released is less than the quantity in respect of which duties were paid;
7 f2 f* Q2 I) P0 F0 B5 L+ j' n(c) they are of a quality inferior to that in respect of which duties were paid;
* F* P+ C0 r" A6 z7 p(c.1) the goods were exported from a NAFTA country or from Chile but no claim for preferential
9 i$ Z* O3 Z& ]' r" `, }" M* Ctariff treatment under NAFTA or no claim for preferential tariff treatment under the CCFTA, as the. K4 m  t8 n/ X6 X
case may be, was made in respect of those goods at the time they were accounted for under/ X, O$ V# v( X& _& i8 F. E0 ?4 X* p8 Z
subsection 32(1), (3) or (5);) j2 j/ _0 v2 E, \! t3 `
3
  @6 e2 g, A  n(c.11) the goods were imported from Israel or another CIFTA beneficiary but no claim for
1 \; M8 d) F) \( Rpreferential tariff treatment under CIFTA was made in respect of those goods at the time they are# M7 D1 d4 \. G. \& H) k
accounted for under subsection 32(1), (3) or (5);
. L! D& |- e, j. Z(d) the calculation of duties owing was based on a clerical, typographical or similar error;6 L: r. t4 S3 Z9 J! Y, O/ f) L; r
(e) the duties were paid or overpaid as a result of an error in the determination under subsection 58(2)$ Y% l) ~' h" \) v  y
of origin (other than in the circumstances described in paragraph (c.1) or (c.11), tariff classification or9 D1 [) N" |1 H" k7 O
value for duty in respect of the goods and the determination has not been the subject of a decision
* n2 m6 l, R1 ^2 ~- i; w5 eunder any of sections 59 to 61;
  G0 I3 v0 ?9 O) X' H+ M(f) [not applicable to non-commercial goods];
5 b/ s1 ?' f+ v. O9 e(g) the duties were overpaid or paid in error for any reason that may be prescribed.
. k+ x1 z( {2 F% O(1.1) The granting of a refund under paragraph (1) (c.1), (c.11), or (e) or (f), if the refund is based
4 h: h. w0 l; a9 H1 Son tariff classification, value for duty or origin under paragraph (1)(g) is to be treated for the purposes of) A5 t1 B6 w' d3 H1 D0 c
this Act, other than section 66, as if it were a re-determination made under paragraph 59 (1)(a).
9 J2 {2 ]) e2 m9 @, j(2) No refund shall be granted under any of the paragraphs 1(a) to (c) and (d) in respect of a claim0 R3 A5 `. k/ e9 J9 _8 [; p
unless written notice of the claim and the reason for it is given to an officer within the prescribed time.7 R  M9 q. O' a! a" `
(3) No refund shall be granted under subsection (1) in respect of a claim unless* A" U$ l% G. F9 q
(a) the person making the claim affords an officer reasonable opportunity to examine the goods in9 w( L# E0 }$ q$ j- Y
respect of which the claim is made or otherwise verify the reason for the claim; and
5 B; ^1 p; L3 `; g' H4 j0 U+ C(b) an application for the refund, including such evidence in support of the application as may be
0 r( K* G* ]7 ]# B! i4 E2 U- uprescribed, is made to an officer in the prescribed manner and in the prescribed form containing the
8 ]7 e: R3 \, \' |prescribed information within
5 @* A3 m  H8 `. n$ M(i) in the case of an application for a refund under paragraph (1)(a), (b), (c), (c.11), (d), (e), (f)
4 \# _5 r& X+ u, ]or (g), four years after the goods are accounted for under subsection 32 (1), (3) or (5), and5 }) J+ w" ^( h  W
(ii) in the case of an application for a refund under paragraph (1)(c.1), one year after the goods
8 |: L9 t1 q4 g0 mwere accounted for under subsection 32(1), (3) or (5) or such longer period as may be prescribed.
3 }, e* n1 J6 c0 ~(4) A denial of an application for a refund of duties paid on goods is to be treated for the purposes of
; x" W7 y/ e* ]1 \! j! [this Act as if it were a re-determination under paragraph 59(1)(a) if
) e) S: W& p2 q(a) the application is for a refund under paragraph (1)(c.1) or (c.11) and the application is denied- T2 U6 }5 \3 m7 q  e+ Q+ K
because at the time the goods were accounted for under subsection 32(1), (3) or (5), they were not6 [4 p+ b1 D/ e' B) {1 d
eligible for preferential tariff treatment under a free trade agreement; or
$ }1 u' S# n1 S* o(b) the application is for a refund under paragraph (1)(e), (f) or (g) and the application is denied
( z/ m/ C! a- Pbecause the origin, tariff classification or value for duty of the goods as claimed in the application is' ?4 z, a! s- {, s9 H: `2 D
incorrect.
1 C& D- N1 c6 ^, v* ?( g9 y6 k(5) For greater certainty, a denial of an application for a refund under paragraph (1)(c.1), (c.11), (e),
6 X& L1 ]  [& L& i/ [' z+ q(f) or (g) on the basis that complete or accurate documentation has not been provided, or on any ground: d0 q. J( Y! v2 d) t. U
other than the ground specified in subsection (4), is not to be treated for the purposes of this Act as if it1 Y# t; `/ d! o* W- P0 z* y& H4 _
were a re-determination under this Act of origin, tariff classification or value for duty., {3 ~4 P$ Y' ~" V. u' z, B
+ `% |* q: e1 _' Z
这到底是说可以还是不可以啊?
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-8-19 17:04 , Processed in 1.307969 second(s), 10 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表