埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2503|回复: 0

关于 邮购是否免税的问题 退税表 D6-2-6

[复制链接]
鲜花(2) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2011-9-29 22:42 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Memorandum D6-2-6Refund of Duties and Taxes on Non-Commercial Importations4 {$ q+ X2 u6 \# k
上面说 非商业 进口 可以免关税?
" p; Y( ?6 }+ A. ]" f3 }6 M8 _* m$ q2 c, Q' @% r. N! O6 S& }9 n

% s# {. `3 s, Q

" z; I+ \8 K  ~9 Y1 U1 Jhttp://www.cbsa-asfc.gc.ca/publications/forms-formulaires/b2g.pdf# A! u, N  e3 ~  N# I% E
" u: z; A1 p4 d" f; ^0 u

4 |  ]5 P8 S" i7 qRefund Requests+ d- S( Y8 f* T% Y1 B6 h3 {& a' d
74. (1) Subject to this section, section 75 and any regulations made under section 81, a person who9 ^4 u& H& {; @  n, r! y/ O. K7 x
paid duties on any imported goods may, in accordance with subsection (3), apply for a refund of all or part2 Z$ l5 {$ ?1 m& ]7 ~; T+ _
of those duties, and the Minister may grant to that person a refund of all or part of those duties, if
1 _: v: A% O, w& N/ D(a) they have suffered damage, deterioration or destruction at any time from the time of shipment to
8 W  r8 i7 T  M! Y6 nCanada to the time of release;
, I( c0 B8 V4 f* C+ A(b) the quantity released is less than the quantity in respect of which duties were paid;/ ?8 R8 ~8 A- O- D
(c) they are of a quality inferior to that in respect of which duties were paid;. l- [" x  |0 v" f
(c.1) the goods were exported from a NAFTA country or from Chile but no claim for preferential) t& o9 ]. H) Y; a5 p  r
tariff treatment under NAFTA or no claim for preferential tariff treatment under the CCFTA, as the
5 a% b1 ]9 D+ z2 K: ~. Y% @case may be, was made in respect of those goods at the time they were accounted for under
/ d9 m( H8 b7 f; q' o" hsubsection 32(1), (3) or (5);# s% K3 N! _% U2 [
3% o1 l9 B8 V  `3 S
(c.11) the goods were imported from Israel or another CIFTA beneficiary but no claim for
; O$ _( O* \. y4 X7 Q$ bpreferential tariff treatment under CIFTA was made in respect of those goods at the time they are
3 q5 U. D. L5 s) Waccounted for under subsection 32(1), (3) or (5);
/ R- a% J: @, ?5 j+ F- @(d) the calculation of duties owing was based on a clerical, typographical or similar error;
9 G& w# R  I4 k2 t5 k" Z- Z% @(e) the duties were paid or overpaid as a result of an error in the determination under subsection 58(2)
& z, U# m; x: _4 D  eof origin (other than in the circumstances described in paragraph (c.1) or (c.11), tariff classification or! q4 s% U, x; Y0 i1 W
value for duty in respect of the goods and the determination has not been the subject of a decision
; v$ j2 N6 m9 N+ v) h: V( v+ Yunder any of sections 59 to 61;+ j8 S# i- _3 l
(f) [not applicable to non-commercial goods];7 g! V7 u4 v- v6 E! m- f
(g) the duties were overpaid or paid in error for any reason that may be prescribed.3 b+ I2 M! F. r
(1.1) The granting of a refund under paragraph (1) (c.1), (c.11), or (e) or (f), if the refund is based
8 S/ E; w3 Y; [' Q* V- y; aon tariff classification, value for duty or origin under paragraph (1)(g) is to be treated for the purposes of
* y9 G4 {( b# J  m8 Cthis Act, other than section 66, as if it were a re-determination made under paragraph 59 (1)(a).
& o" x% n* |" y) b' N4 L(2) No refund shall be granted under any of the paragraphs 1(a) to (c) and (d) in respect of a claim
  R% c2 ?  B& K& y$ M+ hunless written notice of the claim and the reason for it is given to an officer within the prescribed time.
1 ~3 J0 a6 u2 N/ W(3) No refund shall be granted under subsection (1) in respect of a claim unless+ p$ c, Q1 @& I' a% X0 O
(a) the person making the claim affords an officer reasonable opportunity to examine the goods in* s6 `' q9 u) k" I8 `( h/ o9 e
respect of which the claim is made or otherwise verify the reason for the claim; and' B' B- i; W5 h( k5 N
(b) an application for the refund, including such evidence in support of the application as may be
  X7 D# W" w4 M- W0 Kprescribed, is made to an officer in the prescribed manner and in the prescribed form containing the
) W0 U8 o, z% X' \, Jprescribed information within
! H- V9 ?! w/ F(i) in the case of an application for a refund under paragraph (1)(a), (b), (c), (c.11), (d), (e), (f)7 Z# ~; G2 Y( }& ~% @7 _4 Z
or (g), four years after the goods are accounted for under subsection 32 (1), (3) or (5), and3 e7 j7 J0 ?+ g+ q
(ii) in the case of an application for a refund under paragraph (1)(c.1), one year after the goods
% G' s1 `# J5 m# cwere accounted for under subsection 32(1), (3) or (5) or such longer period as may be prescribed.' Q( a& R& q2 w1 O8 ^0 V5 U) z: V
(4) A denial of an application for a refund of duties paid on goods is to be treated for the purposes of: j/ z/ l" Y4 q+ n
this Act as if it were a re-determination under paragraph 59(1)(a) if6 r/ O" s. z" h) k3 I2 y  ^
(a) the application is for a refund under paragraph (1)(c.1) or (c.11) and the application is denied9 s7 W4 F3 B5 U
because at the time the goods were accounted for under subsection 32(1), (3) or (5), they were not5 i6 I6 m) M; ]& T7 T3 ~. \
eligible for preferential tariff treatment under a free trade agreement; or
) @/ A- q5 W5 v$ F(b) the application is for a refund under paragraph (1)(e), (f) or (g) and the application is denied5 A) d; b% I' V! U6 D  P
because the origin, tariff classification or value for duty of the goods as claimed in the application is6 h: f. n: J4 B
incorrect.
$ R# ^; N* {( f9 y(5) For greater certainty, a denial of an application for a refund under paragraph (1)(c.1), (c.11), (e),
: h$ ?4 o0 W: o* ~# m0 V7 B) e(f) or (g) on the basis that complete or accurate documentation has not been provided, or on any ground
) F& S. F- b! ^other than the ground specified in subsection (4), is not to be treated for the purposes of this Act as if it; H- ~. e( ~: a! R  i
were a re-determination under this Act of origin, tariff classification or value for duty.
: M' Z3 [6 I! q3 M) V- `# a8 a4 |! f6 S
这到底是说可以还是不可以啊?
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-4-12 04:26 , Processed in 0.154738 second(s), 10 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表