埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 3825|回复: 0

关于 邮购是否免税的问题 退税表 D6-2-6

[复制链接]
鲜花(2) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2011-9-29 22:42 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Memorandum D6-2-6Refund of Duties and Taxes on Non-Commercial Importations
) ^5 {. |! r  [* {( q上面说 非商业 进口 可以免关税?2 d  f0 {5 G- v4 ^: X
* u& I3 D: ~) W5 b9 N8 }

: v4 }. `! x, i! J
! S' g1 n& {: |! R" F. _$ ?
http://www.cbsa-asfc.gc.ca/publications/forms-formulaires/b2g.pdf+ Y, C1 t- @3 A* f  c

) v' \/ g* \) {0 N0 w6 ~
( x" V7 d1 U! f( D( j% o! o; oRefund Requests
& ^  d, @% `/ w" d5 P  f/ s- B( Z. f74. (1) Subject to this section, section 75 and any regulations made under section 81, a person who! l: b: J# D  I( n# J
paid duties on any imported goods may, in accordance with subsection (3), apply for a refund of all or part
# W) a: ]; w; I. wof those duties, and the Minister may grant to that person a refund of all or part of those duties, if2 A: C) t& B: ^8 q3 q+ {
(a) they have suffered damage, deterioration or destruction at any time from the time of shipment to
# w! C0 W7 n& T+ I7 mCanada to the time of release;. m9 q. X% i  i9 ~
(b) the quantity released is less than the quantity in respect of which duties were paid;; [# Q. o; L/ [0 y( }
(c) they are of a quality inferior to that in respect of which duties were paid;3 Q0 f; a( K' w" p  h; b
(c.1) the goods were exported from a NAFTA country or from Chile but no claim for preferential: s  F& N; o2 \# y7 ?3 h
tariff treatment under NAFTA or no claim for preferential tariff treatment under the CCFTA, as the' ]* ?0 E( V# I0 X- _* p! ~
case may be, was made in respect of those goods at the time they were accounted for under+ H$ p4 d2 T  M4 ~% h9 {- z, q
subsection 32(1), (3) or (5);% d2 z9 K, g$ |, |
3! S# q; v/ M4 L7 |4 o% ]1 t, _
(c.11) the goods were imported from Israel or another CIFTA beneficiary but no claim for
" B$ j' J6 D# q. l; Upreferential tariff treatment under CIFTA was made in respect of those goods at the time they are: |* O% U9 ]7 @" Z  ^' U
accounted for under subsection 32(1), (3) or (5);* ?( a  m: ~7 V: {
(d) the calculation of duties owing was based on a clerical, typographical or similar error;5 Q- X1 V% s- H5 S
(e) the duties were paid or overpaid as a result of an error in the determination under subsection 58(2)1 D# b' ^7 U1 a9 `- w' M* T
of origin (other than in the circumstances described in paragraph (c.1) or (c.11), tariff classification or. A- R: ]+ w- S5 J. d+ L* ~# N9 Y
value for duty in respect of the goods and the determination has not been the subject of a decision
  S& G' I5 |& X* punder any of sections 59 to 61;+ t" y3 c( ?. Y% @
(f) [not applicable to non-commercial goods];$ _0 q) B8 e: m) i
(g) the duties were overpaid or paid in error for any reason that may be prescribed.
1 Z% z0 T# n9 C/ I7 }2 L(1.1) The granting of a refund under paragraph (1) (c.1), (c.11), or (e) or (f), if the refund is based/ j, e4 x$ H- N* C+ \
on tariff classification, value for duty or origin under paragraph (1)(g) is to be treated for the purposes of; k) z. M3 O9 K6 t
this Act, other than section 66, as if it were a re-determination made under paragraph 59 (1)(a)., C! i0 I6 ^4 q5 H, w
(2) No refund shall be granted under any of the paragraphs 1(a) to (c) and (d) in respect of a claim. Q9 @+ E! U( x% y/ s. s
unless written notice of the claim and the reason for it is given to an officer within the prescribed time.% h% h2 d- Z9 [: Q9 i
(3) No refund shall be granted under subsection (1) in respect of a claim unless$ W4 F0 z5 ~& {, h
(a) the person making the claim affords an officer reasonable opportunity to examine the goods in6 t) c8 n) I$ Q3 @" u' Q
respect of which the claim is made or otherwise verify the reason for the claim; and, P- F- k+ z8 \
(b) an application for the refund, including such evidence in support of the application as may be6 ?/ I5 Z+ }+ i. {: O3 {3 u% W
prescribed, is made to an officer in the prescribed manner and in the prescribed form containing the2 N% p+ K- b9 n# w5 ~
prescribed information within
: `( }. S( P9 @  C  c(i) in the case of an application for a refund under paragraph (1)(a), (b), (c), (c.11), (d), (e), (f)6 U! W" N+ M; \- f
or (g), four years after the goods are accounted for under subsection 32 (1), (3) or (5), and
8 @( V+ E5 k/ o(ii) in the case of an application for a refund under paragraph (1)(c.1), one year after the goods$ F7 D3 K( H* _# i1 ]
were accounted for under subsection 32(1), (3) or (5) or such longer period as may be prescribed.
9 |# z1 b* X0 I0 V7 v, K+ Q! B(4) A denial of an application for a refund of duties paid on goods is to be treated for the purposes of" w3 E; b! r' P% T
this Act as if it were a re-determination under paragraph 59(1)(a) if
- l2 P; m* j* f(a) the application is for a refund under paragraph (1)(c.1) or (c.11) and the application is denied5 y$ {% y$ g* l/ R7 f3 ?2 f
because at the time the goods were accounted for under subsection 32(1), (3) or (5), they were not; g! o7 _$ o0 E# U6 }
eligible for preferential tariff treatment under a free trade agreement; or( l. \% P5 V4 n# H0 s
(b) the application is for a refund under paragraph (1)(e), (f) or (g) and the application is denied& C. T; E' o7 S2 y- E
because the origin, tariff classification or value for duty of the goods as claimed in the application is
9 T' r% m, w+ v1 C% b; A; eincorrect.7 t. o% g/ }# T( y; Z
(5) For greater certainty, a denial of an application for a refund under paragraph (1)(c.1), (c.11), (e),1 W+ J: f7 z/ ^( `
(f) or (g) on the basis that complete or accurate documentation has not been provided, or on any ground, P' L0 N' S4 v# }; ~$ D4 V1 m
other than the ground specified in subsection (4), is not to be treated for the purposes of this Act as if it
6 O5 R( T& A/ c1 z1 Z- uwere a re-determination under this Act of origin, tariff classification or value for duty.# ]5 v. h6 E; q' Y1 B6 F. W

5 u7 Q$ y& d4 V5 y8 [. R0 i2 D这到底是说可以还是不可以啊?
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-10-9 11:01 , Processed in 0.061080 second(s), 10 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表