请问各位这个房子如何

粽子

http://www.realtor.ca/propertyDe ... p;PidKey=-829276348
' m$ q- h% q6 Q* I% J6 y
值这个价钱吗

ram

我认为房子不错。

skybird

http://www.realtor.ca/propertyDetails.aspx?propertyId=10659596&PidKey=-829276348

1 H( \9 j) r/ l: _& H/ I3 d/ {值这个价钱吗
* i" T  F5 N8 [6 R' A% M$ F( J粽子 发表于 2011-5-12 16:04

' P* |* g5 H, J' T% E  N9 c" M去看过这个房子，户型很怪，空间利用率不好。bonus room很小，里面都是不规则形状的布局，尖角和棱角的分割使空间凌乱又不好利用。餐厅很小，没有任何升级。地下室的空间格局难以利用。

ram

去看过这个房子，户型很怪，空间利用率不好。bonus room很小，里面都是不规则形状的布局，尖角和棱角的分割使空间凌乱又不好利用。餐厅很小，没有任何升级。地下室的空间格局难以利用。
skybird 发表于 2011-5-12 17:37

眼见为实。

健康营养站

good.worth.

icing

not bad, I like it. And the price is much lower than gov. assess value.
Tax Roll: 9982751
) F  f5 w) x8 G9 u5 f8 MAssessed Value: $497,000
3 y% {! S: c8 w" h: [100% Taxable: Yes
100% Complete: Yes
Neighbourhood: Richford
Property Type: Residential
# ]) g: u7 p+ C7 E+ o. A4 ULand Use: 100% Single Family Dwelling
" T1 V/ j5 v; o; P4 qLot Size: 467.092 M2 / 5027.9 FT2 / .115 AC
Building Count: 1
& U% P2 p8 B7 U9 S; C, JYear Built, Building Class: 2000, 2 Storey With Basement
Approx Living Area: 201.4 M2 / 2167.9 FT2
# c7 ~0 g- y& S# M+ J+ c(Does not include basement area or 3rd level of split level)
$ _4 x* R& e1 k3 b# @Basement Development: No
Garage: Yes
( ]5 O1 o" K3 }& D+ }- i  J/ qFireplace: Yes
. A' Q9 V" u: E+ y9 EWalkout Basement: No
" A( g& ]" C& U6 R3 j% F$ nAir Conditioning: No

uil

the position is something need to concern.

Stethoscope

it looks ok.

6 a8 H( c/ x* F: c6 d) x& p- Gyou better get there and have a look on ur own, then you can get something different from the pictures.