& O. ]5 O S/ D嘿嘿,好容易逮到一个自愿上钩,愿意奉献的,你想不干都不成了~* `2 H& q1 \* c' d& e7 U% M
D( `/ a' _' |. q* N
你别误会,我只是说程序上的公平是我个人喜欢的执法方式,并不是说其它方式是不好的。8 O- h1 C1 u& k% r
; o4 y# E2 m3 z7 X& O
不举例子你就不请我吃饭了?那夏天为啥请我吃饭了?
$ U( R4 [5 P6 w' g VI agree. Everyone has his own version of 正义. As a result, conflicts can't be solved, due to a lack of common ground. / B7 E; h+ \ V3 h9 v, Q7 Q) e9 r+ s
However, a 程序上的公平 is shared by everyone. Even if it's not perfect, it's a static thing that people know what to expect and adapt.
6 C$ h- S: `* Q! _0 [ {You are just being naive. If you think you can implement your so called “justice” by modifying rules, you are dreaming. No law is perfect. There are always loopholes.- s: M* ] r+ b
: U X( Y! Q) n: T# |) r
Let me tell you a story. About a year ago, a guy published a book in U.S teaching people how to sexually abuse young children without being caught. Disgusting, right? Guess what, there is nothing can be done to stop him. Why? Because it’s legal according to U.S human right law.
You are just being naïve. If you think you can implement your so called “justice” by modifying rules, you are dreaming. No law is perfect. There are always loopholes.# G. B; ` k+ C7 {4 @% D' N8 }
- V% E$ a1 |( B; }: e
Let me tell you a sto ...: f- V6 r- @3 @# r1 G
tqbs 发表于 2011-2-2 13:20