7 |, c! s& n; w; w
I agree. Everyone has his own version of 正义. As a result, conflicts can't be solved, due to a lack of common ground. + d: }+ I; r1 k- o 8 @- y+ o" x$ E j: ~However, a 程序上的公平 is shared by everyone. Even if it's not perfect, it's a static thing that people know what to expect and adapt.
\3 p# q# X! k
You are just being naive. If you think you can implement your so called “justice” by modifying rules, you are dreaming. No law is perfect. There are always loopholes. * F {0 m) c2 o6 l* J- k4 y0 e2 t$ x 0 ^! i; x# d! I2 MLet me tell you a story. About a year ago, a guy published a book in U.S teaching people how to sexually abuse young children without being caught. Disgusting, right? Guess what, there is nothing can be done to stop him. Why? Because it’s legal according to U.S human right law.
You are just being naïve. If you think you can implement your so called “justice” by modifying rules, you are dreaming. No law is perfect. There are always loopholes. ' t) s/ E) l2 Z2 v 3 `7 @0 `8 O. U4 X8 ?( p* T, rLet me tell you a sto ..., K: b- c! w* L& e- `
tqbs 发表于 2011-2-2 13:20
2 Q# l, I. B' }0 c9 N$ c) o1 n
小黄,我说过不遵守法律的话没有?没有,我的原话是不要死扣条条框框。 1 F" v6 O! P2 l6 Z" h0 Y比如,投诉十三少的三个案子,我只处理一个,有问题吗? 7 n5 y' B; s# l' n ?一个足以永封,何必浪费精力去处理另外两个?