( Q/ \, F% \; E9 @
I agree. Everyone has his own version of 正义. As a result, conflicts can't be solved, due to a lack of common ground. ; t$ v3 D f# y5 Y4 X, c
0 J. a, U/ _2 D* Y+ |2 h6 T$ Z
However, a 程序上的公平 is shared by everyone. Even if it's not perfect, it's a static thing that people know what to expect and adapt.
谢谢,希望所有的执法能够记住这句话。- j# u, s+ k: @
南京街头,现在没有老人敢摔倒在地,就是因为一次看起来程序合法但是不公正的判罚。' H! B' V: M6 U$ i
紫光 发表于 2011-2-2 12:43
+ [- m) D6 k, {5 rYou are just being naive. If you think you can implement your so called “justice” by modifying rules, you are dreaming. No law is perfect. There are always loopholes./ ^- E4 {5 i, H' f) T6 A. Q
4 I' O# b+ U) _7 C& G! K" h
Let me tell you a story. About a year ago, a guy published a book in U.S teaching people how to sexually abuse young children without being caught. Disgusting, right? Guess what, there is nothing can be done to stop him. Why? Because it’s legal according to U.S human right law.
You are just being naïve. If you think you can implement your so called “justice” by modifying rules, you are dreaming. No law is perfect. There are always loopholes.8 s! T t2 O2 `, _5 J
- {: ^! a5 D2 m8 E9 S% F* ]! l
Let me tell you a sto ...8 L8 g8 G, \( ^4 {% s) c
tqbs 发表于 2011-2-2 13:20
3 ^6 b4 k7 J7 n. H5 {/ D7 Y
你这段和我要表达的关系不大,没有完美的法律,但是可以有坚持正义的法官。