 鲜花( 115)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
本帖最后由 年轻的心 于 2010-12-1 13:52 编辑 , A8 W6 [2 G. }* o
& s: D& t F" H+ I7 |2010年12月
, S" k' Z6 y& O. e$ @Bank of Canada Interest Rate
8 G S [) I% V' K- @6 e: x8 z- C1 t$ T. P
| | September 8, 2010 | 1.00 % | | October 19, 2010 | 1.00 % | | December 7, 2010 | Next meeting date | Source: Bank of Canada- v( @! J6 A+ @6 {
2 R2 F+ q, C- F& x/ s
7 G1 B% G* O0 d, h3 IBank Prime Lending Rate" H% w) }5 Q9 N. Y5 F
0 C: x/ O3 M8 z% t2 B A
) f- X$ j7 H5 m| September 9, 2010 | 3.00 % | | October 20, 2010 | 3.00 % | | December 8, 2010 | Next meeting date | 0 J* K. V4 b, y% M, c
Source: Bank of Canada7 P$ ]$ b5 t& B1 L$ D) l
0 d6 ]8 h5 K9 M% \! R5 B1 [
% R3 n K) b% {# U9 o/ u& h
) a ?# u( a6 {' D% A$ T+ `8 K3 ^" X% k
Conventional Mortgage - 5 Year Rate*
/ r9 |% e4 V* d1 p0 k$ F
; }$ l' |: f- w6 s% D1 Z0 u2 T0 l+ ~3 b j0 k
| September 15, 2010 | 5.39 % | | October 18, 2010 | 5.29 % | November 29, 2010
2 p) E& ?7 X' B! g4 X; _ | 5.44 % |
' m& q& j) |% H8 W4 DSource: Bank of Canada) Q- g& f. f: w, K# r- P( T$ b" u
*Determinant for high ratio mortgage variable qualifying rate6 M# F: p$ ?4 G0 c0 J C- U- o8 o
/ m. L! Z& e4 M5 e* z4 k$ A1 Q, ]7 n( A/ U" L
; n3 k2 Q2 ]0 T1 p! I$ {% y% R3 t3 w, P' H s
US Federal Reserve Board Discount Rate4 b) `4 h8 o7 w7 x& R
$ V3 z+ f+ J0 O& \# p ] v1 O1 W' y
, h/ `* ~% J* @1 o| September 21, 2010 | 0.00 % - 0.25 % | | November 3, 2010 | 0.00 % - 0.25 % | | December 14, 2010 | Next Meeting date |
* g$ b; r/ t4 \' _- ? u: DSource: US Federal Reserve. X/ g8 t8 z1 k g! P! L$ ~: q, |& D
% ?' X' L) K7 }6 e
8 ?4 y; y" X- L) W; F3 Q3 G
, J2 |4 @7 @# k: e8 h- o
! f2 F' ^2 P. y& U. w5 z2 f+ `' C- q, F5 K+ d
Exchange Rate $CDN($US)$ G( a0 J$ ~( `( ~6 E- t& R. d c
| October 28, 2010 | 0.9790 | | November 10, 2010 | 1.0000 | | November 26, 2010 | 0.9804 | 1 @/ c# l+ y! r+ ]4 B I! ~
Source: Bank of Canada( e* c- h3 x4 V4 {# K! J! t0 N! d! ?( ^
7 t, ?5 Y: ?# J; Z# W M& w+ {
; C3 N& ^- j* @& F2 g0 P; U% N
+ R2 ?' c* V( u4 m. o
; W7 a) T, p* M# N& vGovernment of Canada Bonds
2 ^! ^$ |1 G# e" h2 u8 l- L. _# e, [) V _0 R0 _9 p
3 y/ z& j @7 x+ x! `| Bond Type | October 27, 2010 | November 10, 2010 | November 24, 2010 | 1 year Treasury Bill / S; {" C2 I" z5 n+ U. B# k
| 1.21% 4 A/ P# E: N& [7 m! a! L2 v6 Z9 Z
| 1.27% | 1.39% | 3 year Benchmark! B6 H2 h6 q7 H% ^- v* p
Bond Yield | 1.59% | 1.73% | 1.94% | 5 year Benchmark
8 @1 v8 f9 E3 A! O+ c- Q$ y- IBond Yield | 2.06% | 2.20% | 2.48% | 10 year Benchmark
6 k) L2 ]4 o, y7 TBond Yield | 2.89% | 2.98% | 3.19% | & u6 a4 X i; e
Source: Bank of Canada
& m# z' u2 D1 S9 b6 t
! P$ T3 b" O [" E9 g* H3 y
, G4 U* b- _' @: O" f4 m1 x; A8 B, e) f* N
# x3 X; C3 l1 j7 J% g8 L% c
" Q/ S* h5 e: c" A5 qTotal New Housing Starts (Seasonally adjusted and annualized)* N2 V0 t1 E- O% q
Province
6 u4 ^: k1 @# R u+ ^. L* k | August' K) T5 c9 Q) X
2010 , ?" x% }0 Z1 |( ~( `
| August
, a1 T; r) i% L! n& X9 `8 ~* ^2009 # W. v4 r( u& @& y0 n1 m T
| September6 A, N. f/ d. P, O: \( @" ^
2010
+ w: T& t/ v1 F3 j8 R7 D. d | September1 i2 _/ s H, `) X5 {4 S( a
2009 6 h4 J' P( n$ w+ n5 |
| October
! r$ F8 y7 i1 j. p; C: G2010 & O5 s' Z0 b, E& K* n6 k8 Y) N: d4 A
| October
# X( n( Q: O0 ~5 \* d6 X% [% a2009 . h3 u3 o9 P+ p$ o& ]
| Newfoundland/Labrador) V5 H8 r6 { Y
| 3,500 8 o) L& x0 r& q! E. Q
| 2,400 . t A7 m0 j: ]8 d
| 3,100
- ^& p# n1 y$ Y | 2,800 8 ?9 h5 i% W2 ^; y
| 3,400
& P* |7 Z3 f, M | 2,900 % p+ S6 @) Q8 m+ b% ^
| PEI
* y' D) z2 Q( m$ D0 ^6 T | 1,000
( C5 s: y) I& a | 1,000 & [* _' M3 \- ]( _+ F1 o. C" @0 z
| 500 4 d6 ]( }' F2 j4 e X
| 700 1 j; c. K. R$ Z+ k" |0 X& p5 s1 H
| 400 9 H1 P# y" ~8 Z; J$ M5 ^
| 1,200
: m" }1 q. d. m8 Z m9 u* L( n | Nova Scotia p3 {5 o% ^" v1 c
| 3,200
# J6 f% a9 t: Q9 s: R% W" r) i2 @ | 4,200 & S5 }* q& S$ c! h
| 4,100 ; K9 v0 h0 ]/ }; z: L# q
| 4,500 3 V- R' C' @$ w1 V
| 4,700 t- v- Z& H( L5 a. k7 J( l
| 4,000 / y7 [" `) T' S2 E, U' e
| New Brunswick
% V( b% b; |, {6 l | 5,100 6 `+ ^2 v8 v% B) u9 X3 j1 Q0 w
| 3,700
* h- ]/ i2 ^* v( }3 L- D0 D9 q | 2,400 : D3 a, L8 |/ l
| 2,900 / I- z7 F y0 e3 s; M$ {1 G# m
| 4,900
, n7 q, B9 J9 {- W* d | 3,600
* I# `& ]; T* ~" z | Quebec
6 d: c! e$ e% z1 [ | 48,300
3 I2 x6 m5 n: \. l: F# \ | 47,300
i2 T( h M1 ~7 q | 50,700 - F+ \$ `* Z) e2 d8 _
| 41,300
( b3 U, h- _9 f' V2 F# R | 48,600
: O! D& J% m" F7 _" ?% W) w7 S | 37,200 6 E- c" }( T8 ~' |
| Ontario: _3 H/ i1 [: E, p. W. M
| 64,800 # U+ X, {( O g* Q) o" s% ]
| 44,200
i+ I3 L# f+ @6 S- w2 C7 O: e | 58,000 & H0 L1 U- P/ _. h
| 50,200 0 `. [2 f. \6 g# C# \4 a i% y9 G' [: i
| 44,700 7 e) P5 x5 t2 e
| 57,600
5 j# X j% m6 x/ H% x& Z | Manitoba
( O" g) {0 J) I' K% U3 p | 6,100
7 a# T1 {" K$ l) V | 5,000
3 l) F9 }! b6 T0 d | 4,000
) G; `) B2 z! O; _$ e6 { | 4,400 % e4 h. |+ ^- [+ Y, I7 T
| 3,800 6 D3 y) | J# P( ~
| 4,200
% s6 @- Q% P0 T7 C1 k4 p) n/ C | Saskatchewan( D9 x$ T; N, Z5 A6 h6 T4 ^
| 7,700
5 U1 c9 W4 w8 F3 a7 ~9 Q$ M | 5,100 6 V2 I7 H5 L- |( x" w3 t
| 5,400 + i+ N# c' j! z& @( `! T
| 3,700 3 s* d) ^6 S) @) o# A' v2 J
| 4,700 . a# U7 `) c7 E7 Q, M9 e
| 3,600
. A5 ~2 P+ i7 v: \ | Alberta
; m9 z- o6 n( G* a, Q | 23,500
3 p" l/ A$ }" p5 D) i" } | 18,400
2 H3 E. q3 b( d9 U | 27,100 ; U1 v, q6 L8 \- x
| 22,600
* q H1 [0 b; s4 z- M0 m) \ | 25,200
! |# f) C" V/ t9 | D | 25,000
- c: K$ g: ]) H4 g T | British Columbia
e/ R# x+ Z9 k7 q! N7 P | 27,800 * ^' C+ K7 o4 R$ i4 F/ o* ]' r4 n
| 19,200 $ Z9 O# P! t- n3 `1 Y
| 29,700
" Y5 g2 K* t+ x* s0 P | 16,200 9 ?0 m( R+ u$ W8 o! o
| 27,500
$ W, S! s* g% R" @5 b | 18,200 " q% i2 x% ?7 V; d2 S2 N8 X
| CANADA3 Y+ |& v0 ?% d
| 191,000 a9 U% |5 ^, o+ V/ H
| 150,500
, M Y% F9 t7 C/ w | 185,000
% }# ]+ Z; O0 P3 }8 C( y: ]' G | 149,300 9 k) y: y8 U7 e( ^1 X8 z
| 167,900 , ~& @# H% r9 t6 L/ v
| 157,400
% I5 r) [% e2 I' U$ E | & z' m+ `" r a6 o$ q) @( }. u5 r
Source: CMHC Housing Now - November 2010 and November 2009. This seasonally adjusted data goes through stages of revision at different times of the the year.: ]! [8 V, g8 k: F) T1 M
; C: \. O! ^6 o
( U. O4 }% J+ ?' |: n4 a( E! f2 [/ r0 [1 \
8 z2 C5 N( f! X: L2 f2 ?; \
/ Z% }9 H! p8 T. g9 `
Average MLS® Resale Price for Local Markets9 x; |2 f' [6 Q9 Z$ E5 p' x
4 ~( e2 b4 B0 o- X [8 P6 X6 E0 k- R& Q6 w) P: P
| City | October 2009 | October 2010 | | Halifax | $235,465 | $248,678 | | Saint John | $178,632 ; G L- w8 m# Z
| $165,032 | | Quebec | $219,440 | $246,918 | | Montreal | $285,100 | $309,638 | | Ottawa | $320,561 | $305,872
3 U7 d" T: w% A$ m( Y | | Toronto | $423,507 | $443,633 | | Hamilton/Burlington | $296,253 | $305,872 | | Winnipeg | $210,618 | $229,467 | | Saskatoon | $274,759 | $293,929 | | Calgary | $393,574 | $399,679 | | Edmonton | $351,768 | $317,096 | | Vancouver | $638,948 | $707,207 | | Victoria | $481,500 | $343,747 |
# O9 `' y: v' u" F! K/ |Source: Canadian Real Estate Association
' @0 c8 z8 c2 X: Q$ U9 e: i. p, m1 Z3 i/ J" Y+ g' H
, a, e) t& \5 ~3 c/ q! T2 H1 Q& Q
) W5 O4 R9 G2 [" Q- K3 ^
% ^7 D t5 B( e, L# h8 A1 A/ D- ~# v3 @* F9 h
Quarterly Housing Affordability Index
, h8 [8 h2 K2 x; W3 r9 ZStandard Two-Storey # ~* V$ E" _$ j* Y4 {' @. G# w5 j
( e/ x4 }+ S( V# D9 m | Average Price
3 H5 {( ~2 [3 }& }5 R7 Z O+ b |
/ I9 _4 _; _0 q$ {# W | RBC Housing Affordability Measure 5 Z+ n: u w* S! l3 d( s% P
| Region , g, V1 O' p& l2 l2 W( H. N$ Z8 x
| Q3 2010
: p! O- {9 m: Z& x. J($)
# F& @$ N5 l$ X, y+ _ | Y/Y
" D8 h; c0 o2 d% ch.
" e8 a( a( I' c8 @ | Qualifying
- a5 t, e& M6 G; LIncome ($)
( z5 T* }) z* B2 @' R7 KQ3 2010 & `6 K4 C, u6 v1 W- B* [6 i
| Q3 2010( F5 L; V8 E& R- |4 n7 \+ }
(%) 0 B! A7 S- ]0 ~
| Q/Q
0 C, @8 M* L& dPpt. Ch. - A8 n% v, L b {# e
| Y/Y
- o2 q$ F0 M: `4 U5 E9 [; WPpt. Ch.
. {' m: G$ t1 m) i" e | Avg. since) N! }2 |0 v2 }
'85 (%) ; `! V" y7 y8 W9 d0 q
| Canada
" {. R* M9 Q! t | 370,700
( E8 v- J2 F' D) | | 6.3 8 t2 T9 V" n9 B
| 83,100
; o5 F9 S5 ~3 r7 |# n0 \( \+ I | 46.3 3 m3 K. d7 J2 O. J4 a! w# }
| -2.5 " q+ j7 |3 i; v) w3 n& F
| 0.3 , {1 C a% M/ T. n: G* }% g0 g
| 43.3
4 D, v8 X! o% Y: c3 p# M! ] | British Columbia
0 V- ]! J$ t: J7 z p | 624,800
% Y9 V3 e! L q- s' {: ^ | 8.0
+ Z; }+ b- ^+ y/ X# P4 c/ d/ U | 124,500
+ ~ F( g9 b q) X, ] | 67.5
& {, r) {7 E0 V9 `4 o R | -3.9 % o' W: J, {( p) {8 M, j* \: g9 J6 Y
| 1.4 / \8 [: U5 Y; m! a1 E+ k
| 54.1 1 e# b7 p% P0 c- ^; b
| Alberta $ x6 W3 F) K/ M8 H; l7 V! I
| 365,600 ! n: v I: ?- c8 [+ v# Z
| 0.1 ! T6 F& x$ [1 v* z
| 81,400 & B$ r. u7 E4 ?) E
| 35.6 " |$ r6 T% k [# l& H* D3 h- ?( L( y
| -1.8 ' q" g5 u1 ^7 J# u- T
| -2.0 $ d$ q" B6 E) f% l8 B: j
| 38.6
# G" o" N8 n$ O, m0 A; s | Saskatchewan 2 F4 b2 N: @& B: q+ d' E
| 315,300 1 o8 w- E p+ N+ t+ Z
| 5.1
& P7 `$ O& _ a. O0 E/ A3 U5 ^/ l8 F | 74,100 . b0 S9 W( a5 e/ {
| 40.8 ' W) c: q8 Y$ r: a- Q9 T' O4 L0 M
| -2.2
; R0 N- Y' I% A! D. f | -1.1 2 U, {$ v* I/ y5 w4 [ B( O
| 38.0 9 b: v* ^/ s8 w* \2 @8 q
| Manitoba
' [) r4 r3 O6 s | 269,700
' Y5 s) W/ {' [+ ~9 [ | 7.8
. B2 G8 V V+ R9 s# r* i | 65,000
! n' F0 c0 {; M& F3 n1 T' E | 37.1 , d' Y5 @- f, z8 b# e1 j, F
| -2.3
: ]* m+ U+ Z: w8 f& ? | 0.8
- ]2 M0 Z, q8 G! {4 i | 37.7 , J1 E4 k- t. J6 i9 g6 C% C$ Q
| Ontario & l) ?9 O9 H2 J9 _
| 388,200 & r) `2 @5 ~. [' K D
| 6.2 n6 m" F- I& u$ U' O0 ~$ y; T
| 89,800
* n) \* r. ^+ v3 ? | 44.9
! ?0 ^/ {, N; \; R! U$ P8 \ | -2.4
, |3 z5 K" k* r | 0.4 % ?6 r3 z8 ~1 V, z$ O d, ?) ]0 X6 a
| 43.7
' P' T; v, B+ d3 P/ c | Quebec ; B. F2 U' T$ Z% T1 E; w
| 262,100
# g( c. |* b, A) {7 L/ {8 K2 w | 8.6
' L1 }) q/ ?/ m4 Z' l& d1 N | 61,700 # ?( m. R( N A' Y
| 41.7
( I6 K0 T( j/ \/ @! ]6 C8 Y/ U | -1.8 5 ^3 M2 k7 G+ @. n$ ^" N6 q
| 1.3 # T. G; j- g. B/ M$ a- [, B& m: y
| 38.8
. C: }" t3 m$ ~* j6 h# n | Atlantic
6 ^( m d& L; O" V" ? _ | 222,100
M, x" w( K* J6 V! V* A | 4.3
- [0 m! K5 R ^$ w F | 55,900 ( ?# ?8 s3 p F# a/ P
| 36.5
$ G5 l$ t3 f6 l A3 w | -1.4
, F1 ?" L* Y+ i( K% W& _( O! F2 j | 0.1 " V/ t/ R; y; j- J
| 38.0
C% f' W& f' h( \! N1 U% z | Toronto / S a2 f% I1 C/ W3 V7 `, [; e
| 554,700 6 L* M; @* T) t& | Q* ^
| 5.6 ) R9 B4 N! Z3 }" V
| 120,400 & W; x, T: a5 @2 C: O/ x% @, u9 q
| 56.2
q: |" J/ j. U9 M5 h8 f | -3.8
' K& J. J/ T+ |8 x/ m | 0.1 ! _$ Z( ]( i. P. Q2 X0 y8 n, p( R; {
| 53.4 # G. `2 A+ ^2 u) K1 A3 x
| Montreal }# A5 k/ z5 V
| 335,300 , G; f$ D6 b* \( g
| 8.9
$ V( s5 S' Y' Z9 q | 75,800 % }/ @3 }# @+ z; U( U
| 51.3 9 k7 M7 [# }* t) M% `3 w
| -1.7 - n- W$ e2 v; p( U% r& A
| 1.7
! \0 q# |+ C4 Z7 |& h, Y0 w4 U | 41.7
! f% h1 @# A- r | Vancouver ( @2 |7 L: F' I
| 766,300 0 i p' B- r# @2 g3 N
| 8.4
* P, }* @2 j6 s: u X0 c( L | 149,400
4 N6 S# h* g" c8 h | 78.1
; ^* z: h. D5 p) ]" g1 p1 j: n | -4.7
0 R! ~, P! m4 w9 k/ Y | 2.0
- S5 ~* v9 T) ~, r5 Y& R/ |) D | 62.6
: a% d& e4 P% T" x+ m | Ottawa 0 W' D5 J, l9 f i4 q4 R
| 350,600 . N! P) _6 [$ [) Q3 Q$ A
| 4.8 ; j0 Q: w0 q% [0 K
| 86,600 8 y$ S& ]: f7 O7 T) O7 h
| 40.5
5 A- o' q) }6 y# w( E | -2.5
3 F+ A/ Y; v8 ^ | 0.0
+ n9 D a% r7 L | 39.1
: K, @, n0 |3 D6 k | Calgary 6 S# C2 V" E/ u7 @! b
| 410,500 3 s; k1 x/ `# d- Y3 x- W) ?
| -1.0
! C2 Q# |; M+ ~' x- ]/ w9 ^ | 86,700
2 R, \ M2 E& f! K) E: Q | 37.9 $ L1 D( H, w) [6 B
| -2.3
2 R+ w0 t5 p1 M6 Y* }) N | -2.6 * M4 h' }- G9 A
| 40.3 ) E2 s* A6 X0 g
| Edmonton 9 o6 R! J5 e; c) Q' ]- g/ a& z
| 362,500 + x5 R5 F' L& D1 C. V' s6 Q4 ~4 `
| 1.2 * W6 @! G. r1 L: Q* l/ z2 n
| 82,500 ' z _4 c. _! v7 v( `* I
| 37.0
: B# H* D9 }2 z) T" `4 ] | -1.9
) \! r+ W5 n9 m; C2 ]& U | -1.6 ! [# V! P0 t9 w- O& L! J t$ u
| 37.0
6 G: }- ?) t- X; G | 5 y/ c) D) c5 T+ P% \
Detached Bungalow " Q' `5 ]) i V) R9 Z
| Average Price
1 F: p2 R; i; K; G( A- ~" D# c6 { |
2 E$ n; L( ?5 T' z. c | RBC Housing Affordability Measure 0 z; P/ o+ z4 [ ?' N. v0 B5 K
| Region
: o0 P0 B2 p& d: H | Q3 2010, I& A& T( u) y N% H
($) 6 _; K6 Z" ?! ^ g D3 L
| Y/Y
. e- G* O) s/ j z4 R% ch. & W* }# Y3 r5 _2 \
| Qualifying
6 X9 x( r' a8 _4 b) {5 z& w% ?0 ^Income ($) + f3 D; \+ J. b5 g, m8 D+ s
Q3 2010
5 w3 w+ \8 B% n& ^3 j8 j9 ]- I$ Q) ? | Q3 2010
. J G8 @) ]6 H(%) ; z1 o- t* F, z6 g
| Q/Q
2 X1 O" ]7 @1 y/ q0 YPpt. Ch. . \" H0 y0 i6 p
| Y/Y9 v- ]- @) Z4 ^$ Z$ k* h
Ppt. Ch.
4 ^& S5 B$ C' t B; T' O: g5 z2 o9 L | Avg. since
; L& R# j( m$ G1 D+ L* r; e# P" x'85 (%)
3 F+ C, q* r2 k: q4 `7 Z | Canada . O1 B; |( `. R. `4 ^0 [9 P$ P/ R4 T3 x! j
| 325,300 0 E9 R; Q# o8 A5 C/ ?
| 6.8
" X( {# G, m9 w/ e' q2 S2 P | 72,500 4 U p' p2 L2 \/ M% x4 r! e! ]
| 40.4 ) Q. z8 j8 u& H- G# P
| -2.4 0 `, g* S, ], j6 o
| 0.3
% @+ @; F5 I# t | 39.0
3 l k& k x% E8 _, G | British Columbia; b. u1 \0 ^- |# o* N9 E
| 544,700 6 i# f2 _( V: M }) x/ b4 O F
| 8.5
. o! E& Z! ?3 p( i( j% E1 v | 108,800
* ]: B* x+ ]2 _ h4 ~& H8 M | 59.0
$ l6 ?% B/ y8 p3 d | -5.0 $ H! M- e3 G+ i& k, o
| 1.5
4 y' |" l, D3 b | 48.9 9 Y0 w8 u' {4 i
| Alberta f2 E5 M6 a; n# f M. E& `
| 340,500
" S/ Z7 Y9 O \ | 2.9 9 }' G; X" O" W- E' U. X
| 74,400
* _7 [( }! E$ W: [ | 32.5 0 P# Q5 |# y1 }$ u s9 f
| -1.8 / {0 W& U- B/ M6 u/ K; W0 k! c
| -1.2
/ t) F' H9 j$ q6 b6 s9 O | 36.1
/ E4 m3 z; |: v' ]8 k | Saskatchewan
9 @, x' H" c2 A: \, r9 o | 312,400 5 }+ q2 M2 n% s( F6 `' y
| 6.3
" k8 @* J3 C3 p | 70,900
" K0 O. q4 V, m" g. G9 o$ V | 39.0
5 C$ r1 d3 U k! r) c | -1.9
7 [, M! x: R+ j. D | -0.8 - p# O& b* u0 O/ {- m% R# \" [* H
| 36.6 ( Q% c$ B+ H4 R1 S+ _* g# Z9 k" I
| Manitoba # F5 [. w; {) ]+ s# y- M- w
| 251,000
, a0 N* {% |/ d | 9.2
9 `5 i2 _4 f1 }. F3 X | 60,800
! Q/ m9 I4 t& \/ p | 34.7
+ v+ [) R( k1 u& p | -1.4 & W6 A/ H4 O3 S( ]; T1 k& I
| 1.1
. d' X0 e1 C, e1 N9 B* W. h- P' Y | 36.8
" u" s: F7 F* k- F8 O5 u3 s | Ontario ) {" @3 K! }0 V5 i
| 337,400 4 [& t. `6 v$ |! C% S
| 6.1
4 y" ?- {/ _1 P0 {, d | 77,900
% u( @' i% _; |5 Z2 u" |5 N' I | 38.9 9 v+ w" x/ y: V2 A
| -2.2 ; o$ u3 R7 G; n; [
| 0.2 , l. ]+ s4 K+ h3 T! Y
| 40.1
2 o% T0 P |. j/ C; U! n | Quebec
& w4 D' c" z. d) E! P4 r | 221,600
7 x' t: U2 s4 t! A7 k! l | 9.3
9 a9 v8 f4 M. U { | 51,700 . N+ ]' W& C' x, F2 X g
| 35.0 9 O6 [1 i7 o/ K' K
| -1.4 8 }! d, ?' m( J$ V' J, ^
| 1.2 ) V j( t/ r% r
| 32.9 " ~1 y b; l; X1 }) b
| Atlantic 9 c+ z3 m4 n, W
| 196,600
4 U0 q8 B# B( I1 y7 t | 2.3 & @. x8 U! o- @
| 48,200 6 T# q( |! M5 M
| 31.4 ' U) P' x# O$ @2 y/ F" q9 H: n" [
| -1.0
7 V/ ^2 A. {% Q3 f | -0.4
8 M& b ]- f' l! C/ A p- s | 31.6
/ J" F# K- b3 d% ]' y3 x | Toronto
$ {$ `$ r9 X" [9 d, u8 h# s | 466,600
1 O2 n$ s2 A6 D4 Y, ?& l' r | 5.0
8 ~3 @+ n0 N! \ Z, |5 ]3 K | 101,100 4 F- J9 J/ I/ F3 K' z$ j6 W& R. C5 T
| 47.2
" F5 b0 j" H' n/ J | -3.0
; q0 X e" G9 f/ P+ X | -0.1
+ v. ?( h7 P' ]. \9 D1 h4 D | 48.2 # `# ~: m7 y( w. `% [ V2 D
| Montreal
# x3 q, ~1 a* j/ B1 ~ | 271,100 2 I! d1 @5 g) w: J
| 11.8 . ^* A+ d" S6 m
| 61,600 8 }1 C" p9 w! W/ R
| 41.7
6 V/ l/ @) Y6 C z+ w2 n | -1.3
9 U3 c6 P6 b2 [ | 2.2
8 Y$ u! B& l& Z- {" n3 x | 36.9
8 N9 j& O: ]/ Y. U5 n* d% C0 d | Vancouver 1 {! V+ |" }3 Z% T# V
| 672,500
+ @% |2 ?( T1 ?: ~. S; g3 Y | 9.7
$ W- ]: K2 J( e, Q$ a | 131,600 " r! P) |0 L0 f( C
| 68.8
+ c |. r1 P+ N- E$ ]: r1 O | -5.4 . c( f" m2 ^9 n% ?) C, X
| 2.4 1 r2 F6 s4 H1 z5 ]+ s' P
| 57.3 . ]& M6 ^7 ?0 |1 P9 e5 C2 ~. p
| Ottawa
* h$ g6 Z: I' ] | 340,800
" q2 y) P8 D4 n! e5 l | 3.4
) j4 y) r& h" J- g | 81,800 6 L+ \6 k" i# l7 j
| 38.2
! Y: d8 G6 R! w6 x M0 {5 f' ? | -2.9
% E; S. X, a- q" o) g. y" l3 t+ O | -0.5
( q+ d. f' V4 h2 ?! R) y' t! b | 36.6
+ q; A5 |7 r* I. |: i- K | Calgary
( J9 @- p0 Y3 l* a$ \9 [- b/ A | 412,700 ; c# ?: w- I+ F0 ^0 u6 e
| 2.7
; v. G9 P; s9 L0 T | 85,00 9 k+ _ }6 r8 C$ @
| 37.1 " E5 r) x2 {- |
| -2.0 9 q9 Y3 k, N0 V! \5 c: P# {
| -1.5 6 Y3 N$ _0 r( h$ y
| 39.9 : ] m* T p+ S- ^3 p8 x
| Edmonton
' n# H2 J1 j. }& b0 { | 322,900 + q$ r! c* x+ `# \
| 5.4 : |' {. c0 i6 K, i% p
| 72,900 - o6 i, S8 Y1 r! K( [+ p: ?1 C& B% C
| 32.7
7 C& v0 L. Q! E7 R, |* @ | -2.0
% A9 p7 b! q- |% h1 c | -0.5 % M0 o7 l) l, L- z7 i3 s' R
| 33.9 4 N L& s* c* R- X3 j5 |& q
|
C' s; Y' ~5 [6 r, G5 |
7 s" T6 b. g" H; v6 i; o8 |* HSource: RBC November 2010. The measures are based on a 25% down payment, a 25-year mortgage loan at a five-year fixed rate and are estimated on a quarterly basis for each province and for Montreal, Toronto, Ottawa, Calgary, Edmonton and Vancouver-metropolitan areas. The measures use household income rather than family income to account for the growing number of unattached individuals in the housing market. The higher the measure, the more difficult it is to afford a house.4 `. r( t" m/ l& j* `9 s5 E
, `# t9 r3 S- N$ G" C |
|
| |
|
|