 鲜花( 21)  鸡蛋( 0)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2010-10-5 20:41
|
显示全部楼层
正好刚看到一个类似的问题在别的英文论坛:
1 y* j# W1 W& J5 m
" F7 v" c2 Y4 h: `F4 IS Vs. F2.8 non IS, 贴过来大家都评论评论。3 Z$ P( _+ v4 T/ ?9 F! ^! X
, B& Q" c9 b' I' T6 N* F**********************************$ u" x ` l3 S9 D4 S3 n, {$ j% T
Anyhow, you pose a good question - f/4 IS or f/2.8 non IS. Here are the main points:
5 z/ ^# I7 ]. p% s2 t, |; X8 m/ h \$ ~" `3 e/ T- [% w! }5 R
1) The f/2.8 gives you one extra stop of hand-holding possibility, but at the cost of depth of field, whereas the 4.0 gives you 3 stops of hand-holding possibility at any aperture. Winner: f/4.
* {4 N1 o9 e U3 ?* L, B8 ]3 E2 ^: X d5 j4 c- B" M
2) The f/2.8 gives you one extra stop of light in darkened conditions when photographing moving subjects. The f/4 doesn't. Winner: f/2.8.
: A E; a: t& j% n5 V+ N7 N5 @/ U" j5 \! z
3) The f/4 is lighter and smaller. Winner f/4.
/ F3 W% U. v L9 P" S# v# M& h+ B1 ]0 i( z
4) The wider aperture of the f/2.8 can offer more creative possibilities, especially when taking portraits. Winner: f/2.8.5 k- s# i4 d7 z$ s$ t1 T
?2 r* M9 X2 ? R) M$ S& n0 }5) The f/2.8 has better bokeh (creaminess of the blurred areas). Winner: f/2.8. |
|