 鲜花( 21)  鸡蛋( 0)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2010-10-5 20:41
|
显示全部楼层
正好刚看到一个类似的问题在别的英文论坛:
# H1 y' h3 `8 O+ V9 c( T7 f6 _! b C8 e! T
F4 IS Vs. F2.8 non IS, 贴过来大家都评论评论。+ Y9 G+ E+ f% M) I1 G3 H
" d# d$ `/ p, w$ K$ B" H**********************************) B% \8 w) N2 U4 P. t, D8 [
Anyhow, you pose a good question - f/4 IS or f/2.8 non IS. Here are the main points:
) c8 e/ i: s8 i x$ G6 n3 r: r, S# q( L; w3 q
1) The f/2.8 gives you one extra stop of hand-holding possibility, but at the cost of depth of field, whereas the 4.0 gives you 3 stops of hand-holding possibility at any aperture. Winner: f/4.
3 P1 p/ x/ e8 J( s" l& Q4 D9 m+ q; Z. |# ]. h
2) The f/2.8 gives you one extra stop of light in darkened conditions when photographing moving subjects. The f/4 doesn't. Winner: f/2.8. B5 l8 E* s- p5 {! a
+ o8 z8 y$ ?( y& ? n2 m
3) The f/4 is lighter and smaller. Winner f/4.
3 Z( F0 o5 T& E( H3 {9 ?4 Y
; y0 |- l6 h& {) `1 |$ b4) The wider aperture of the f/2.8 can offer more creative possibilities, especially when taking portraits. Winner: f/2.8./ k2 k/ G& x" E( `- q# i
+ l, Q% o8 j4 D5 n
5) The f/2.8 has better bokeh (creaminess of the blurred areas). Winner: f/2.8. |
|