 鲜花( 21)  鸡蛋( 0)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2010-10-5 20:41
|
显示全部楼层
正好刚看到一个类似的问题在别的英文论坛:
: O, q; }- W" C3 v. D6 Q9 h6 m6 J5 X
F4 IS Vs. F2.8 non IS, 贴过来大家都评论评论。- k x+ ]0 Q1 y) o% ^
* }' l8 }( f' E5 R9 ?
**********************************% z8 n# N3 j! z6 d3 u
Anyhow, you pose a good question - f/4 IS or f/2.8 non IS. Here are the main points:
! ]; L6 C; x& u5 J" r7 L4 o$ ^5 _$ x2 s& a: f# [
1) The f/2.8 gives you one extra stop of hand-holding possibility, but at the cost of depth of field, whereas the 4.0 gives you 3 stops of hand-holding possibility at any aperture. Winner: f/4.
}- Q% Y: ~9 H4 z2 U# B4 s9 D5 P' I# i& p
2) The f/2.8 gives you one extra stop of light in darkened conditions when photographing moving subjects. The f/4 doesn't. Winner: f/2.8.
( m7 Z% |+ v- u; \$ }" a2 L! y* {# J* @; h: K. s
3) The f/4 is lighter and smaller. Winner f/4.. p& |/ v8 w8 _+ `* a: Z& @
p! f- w/ ?( x% b
4) The wider aperture of the f/2.8 can offer more creative possibilities, especially when taking portraits. Winner: f/2.8.* g7 N$ C4 g. r+ G) b* D+ \
3 q0 ~' I h7 Y$ Q
5) The f/2.8 has better bokeh (creaminess of the blurred areas). Winner: f/2.8. |
|