 鲜花( 21)  鸡蛋( 0)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2010-10-5 20:41
|
显示全部楼层
正好刚看到一个类似的问题在别的英文论坛:
1 K9 g. g( m8 a) ?0 T3 x, f/ x Z( ~ L* Z! R* G
F4 IS Vs. F2.8 non IS, 贴过来大家都评论评论。
; F0 P& N- c# `5 n% n# V
7 b- B8 F+ d2 }' m**********************************
. h5 J4 e7 U: ?3 [2 O, T2 fAnyhow, you pose a good question - f/4 IS or f/2.8 non IS. Here are the main points:0 ?" Q8 ^' e Q/ a$ c
3 g8 E& x% M8 ?- ?& u" ^1) The f/2.8 gives you one extra stop of hand-holding possibility, but at the cost of depth of field, whereas the 4.0 gives you 3 stops of hand-holding possibility at any aperture. Winner: f/4.$ i7 }" U7 ^, N' Q2 C
5 l1 Q, N- b/ h& G f2) The f/2.8 gives you one extra stop of light in darkened conditions when photographing moving subjects. The f/4 doesn't. Winner: f/2.8.
0 U- p6 b! t7 f. _! B
: Z. u; v& A; w* O/ a& m9 `& J3) The f/4 is lighter and smaller. Winner f/4.
' R+ D7 T( f6 A8 X- t" B# G# Z; w: D( i6 n$ b' D
4) The wider aperture of the f/2.8 can offer more creative possibilities, especially when taking portraits. Winner: f/2.8., p7 E+ j& ^1 n: d
# `3 X' O% \ j$ `6 T& p5 {+ f
5) The f/2.8 has better bokeh (creaminess of the blurred areas). Winner: f/2.8. |
|