 鲜花( 21)  鸡蛋( 0)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2010-10-5 20:41
|
显示全部楼层
正好刚看到一个类似的问题在别的英文论坛:: ]5 p+ [0 l6 }: B9 e" p- C; b
; X0 f4 f. b+ iF4 IS Vs. F2.8 non IS, 贴过来大家都评论评论。; }& }4 Z/ e( u% y' E6 k4 l
R; t) c. B/ ^7 T8 |+ k& i**********************************
. C" ?8 Y. B& z, \9 [& j. i8 |+ RAnyhow, you pose a good question - f/4 IS or f/2.8 non IS. Here are the main points:
" _. a; [ s9 a- t( J1 h3 P; O6 R3 I' o8 z, Q
1) The f/2.8 gives you one extra stop of hand-holding possibility, but at the cost of depth of field, whereas the 4.0 gives you 3 stops of hand-holding possibility at any aperture. Winner: f/4.2 l7 y! S j( k% ?4 ]
5 F `- ^' [, L6 ?+ l* ?2) The f/2.8 gives you one extra stop of light in darkened conditions when photographing moving subjects. The f/4 doesn't. Winner: f/2.8.
6 F; L' Z7 @, R3 p+ t3 o9 q( q: q* `3 C: h Z) x0 E$ I/ k
3) The f/4 is lighter and smaller. Winner f/4.) ]$ j+ K7 c1 }5 T% t3 f
* q1 G) z y- q4 N: D2 Y
4) The wider aperture of the f/2.8 can offer more creative possibilities, especially when taking portraits. Winner: f/2.8.
5 t+ ^6 r; P0 S) G4 v8 I. j ~1 A! C; G. k
5) The f/2.8 has better bokeh (creaminess of the blurred areas). Winner: f/2.8. |
|