- ^9 r+ m1 g4 `) G& a) m" Y. g$ qRead the posts. People were just electing zsm2002 and scuba1995.* m1 P- m6 W, m: R/ A
There is no proof whatsoever that 上山打老虎 was elected. 0 a" U- ` |/ |/ l& m9 S# ?, K1 B
信任zsm2002和scuba1995,不信任另一位。该如何投票? 0 y5 G. c7 C4 O( c' kpchell 发表于 2010-7-26 15:45
; g- c7 ^) r4 c7 y# w $ h @1 U8 P4 [6 s# \: |4 U/ V
Read the posts. People were just electing zsm2002 and scuba1995.2 G: }1 X4 S+ q* a/ k4 ~3 G0 p! c
There is no proof whatsoever that 上山打老虎 was elected., ^, R! n* p+ ^/ Z$ w; c" a7 v
: d2 h) o5 D: r6 O. l$ L* c9 a5 x. _! p# y* M( w/ p, K
) p2 G7 i G% T- ?: e; ?4 \1 U# I8 m0 ]) u" V3 D
+ o% S c: ~% r
. v+ ~) |4 }! K8 k
小黄 发表于 2010-9-8 15:03
+ y# ]8 d- N( D, u2 j7 t! }2 g7 j
没错,是有异议,而且提的有道理, 1 P' g; f2 u- s * d( T) u; Z7 i8 o但是不能改变现行规则还是打包信任投票,三人是符合投票程序,通过投票上任的这个事实 * V6 l% C( _1 C# l2 ~6 W 4 F1 j F( h3 x6 c" ^记得你以前也说过,觉得不合适可以改规则,在此之前,你我都应该尊重规则