 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
道化工亚省工厂将裁员
- M8 Z6 E. L* G$ Z3 `6 lDow Chemical's Alberta facilities will see layoffs# ` @7 e: E. x, [2 M/ u( a0 Z
: g" l( _( p% wEDMONTON — Some employees at Dow Chemical’s Alberta facilities have been notified they will be laid off but the full extent of the job cuts won’t be known until late next week, a company spokesperson said Wednesday.
) j2 F- R9 l3 g8 @! ]3 G
- E; f$ A' Z0 z# H% gMary-Lea Crawford, public affairs manager for Dow at Fort Saskatchewan, would not say how many layoff notices have been handed out so far. : K* K& L! D6 n" S% ^ {8 |- [
9 a0 K5 z( ^; a* B
The cuts are not expected to be as deep as the 11-per-cent target announced by the U.S.-based company in December, she said.0 D: P0 s8 |- M' C3 y
6 b+ d& g$ H$ X r" \! M& d& ^. j
Dow employs about 630 people in Alberta, with 550 in Fort Saskatchewan with the balance at its Prentiss facility near Red Deer.
! |2 t" J4 l/ D9 }9 [8 O* z* v" z- g+ C$ U! t
Dow posted weaker-than-expected fourth-quarter results on Tuesday because demand has plummeted in markets such as the construction, electronics and automotives.0 h+ G0 a+ d6 _2 e/ K% j* |9 ~
3 ~3 ` X( A/ t" {8 k
Dow has tried to revamp its earnings profile over the past two years, first by announcing plans to sell a 50- per-cent stake in its cyclical basic plastics business to Kuwaiti investors for more than $9 billion. Then, in July, it announced plans to spend more than $15 billion to acquire Rohm and Haas using proceeds from the joint venture.1 E) k$ a9 U8 k; i" H& S
, n1 a: `" u7 i0 Y3 X( R7 mDow’s plans faltered when Kuwait backed out of the joint venture. Rohm and Haas said its merger agreement with Dow, was not contingent on the Kuwait transaction.& z$ R. m' _; M: R+ m6 ^
! n/ J* g1 \7 q8 i: @- |! x- V- mPhiladelphia-based Rohm and Haas sued Dow in a bid to force the deal to close. Dow filed its response to the lawsuit on Tuesday.
' D3 A5 R2 E1 [( |8 }( W
$ r* w2 Y) `3 K4 T8 V# gDow argued the agreement was not binding, because it was impossible to carry out “without jeopardizing the very existence of both companies.” |
|