原则上讲已经没什么回旋余地了,但知道以前类似的情况,有这样两个不是理由的理由:3 ?; w; H6 W' G
1.在高速上超速,被逮了个正着,后来他上法庭狡辩说因为小便实在太急了,不快不行. # I7 T' T0 F. N2.还有个人闯红灯,也是没什么好争的,但他又不想付那么多罚款,他就说他是学生,如果付了罚款的话就没钱过日子了.5 Y. M+ s* b2 ~$ J' s. F, v
" D' Z) C( ^) U4 M. O& x
上述两位仁兄都获得了减免.虽是下策,但如果抱着尝试的态度那也不要紧.$ M/ R9 x. H( j3 _
& d8 n! C: h$ e, S
[ Last edited by 社员都是向阳花 on 2005-2-14 at 10:03 AM ]
Here is a report from The edmonton Examiner Jan 19,2005 . Q& i) X0 i. o5 H+ |4 o0 ^The title is "Number of fatall collosions in city continues to climb" . q# S) D9 N' w3 j5 H# m0 B9 `+ L$ ~4 T: U/ D
"Fine for failing to yield to pedestrians jumped in 2004 and now range from $115 to $575, depending on the circumstances." % z- S7 P, c/ w$ F; h 2 L) z; @5 W5 q p3 a5 W' uYou should have a chance to ask some discount.
到哪里查看到这个报告? 请告知。 这也许是个突破口。十分感谢。老实说,靠着托时间我很没谱儿。 不过,当时我确实没有让那个行人受任何惊扰。 是他看到我在前面,先停了下来。那眼神然我觉得他让我先走。 9 H5 [7 Q. y$ n. v* M( E. c9 H. R3 c. z
' Y7 w* P W9 O7 B
Originally posted by yuexu at 2005-2-17 09:39 PM: 0 t& d; t! J* _" @5 c8 cHere is a report from The edmonton Examiner Jan 19,20054 S0 H0 M3 R4 w5 I
The title is "Number of fatall collosions in city continues to climb", ~! d4 N5 N9 i, Y
4 _& ?, m2 i! Y/ ^3 Q! q"Fine for failing to yield to pedestrians jumped in ...
Hi, friend: ) I7 C" V+ v+ e2 R2 j7 M2 D3 n, v# S! G7 m
Do you have a witness ? Did you see the man give you expression that you just pass it first? Did you wave to him after you passed? Think about it and make a decison.