 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 
% E/ W" \2 G: @7 C楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!
0 p k* F7 I9 n9 Ccorolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ...
9 T9 e+ ^; E( m1 n* d
4 H. U, C0 X; X- ~您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。
) I% _; _" B4 x" N; k/ z
. { V4 V: _: ^+ B4 K$ r安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.
7 @$ s. U$ D }6 k1 {$ @4 i9 ^ ~3 H" f: I9 l. L1 B! }% f2 w
不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?
3 n' [5 I3 \% S" D: H% s+ j' K1 t5 W7 N7 y: M( T+ C
另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。
2 ^9 ?6 P7 L P9 q( k+ b* S2 x8 O3 L0 p5 B- H0 Q0 z
关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):$ V1 t$ [4 c( |' ]% I$ x* y' X
Yes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.
0 J: g+ _3 p, C
6 G/ B* r! M% Y# u8 _+ MOr maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".8 z6 J1 G* p( G; U" A3 P R ^
3 ~+ y1 Y6 b3 u/ t" w
But it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.5 }8 V3 f. S( G( I$ ?
8 [6 o P" ]' }" D0 V
[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|