 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 
7 j) O9 i. f5 v, m5 [* Z楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!
( s" Z4 ^2 P4 Q: G; bcorolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ... : t5 z% [: q; N' B) s/ V) m0 X3 I$ W
+ j6 i/ n8 C: y1 O4 n
您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。
2 T% f$ [8 z4 s6 @9 i" `/ J
4 J4 G# q* M8 }2 o2 u( z安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.1 K' E8 W0 r$ s( P4 Z# p
9 D+ V, | t: A1 _
不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?6 Y% B, _- J# S4 O
& e" R+ G4 k8 B' ?* @; ~. W% c
另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。$ \" P" Z J) A' J; J; k
. @" v- m+ M8 ]
关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):
+ u& b- O+ T& @% B3 A0 S9 jYes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.2 y# n6 Z- N8 u1 d0 w
2 r* E# G- x" q& E, k/ HOr maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".; z* x7 o& F+ R9 I1 O5 C
4 ^. U( o$ J4 V7 _But it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.
\' d. I+ y$ ], C6 C5 A- O" @
: q9 u; S, I+ E1 g+ P5 J/ u[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|