 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 $ {' M3 {% | @# o$ F
楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了! n6 `; P" B% o2 u
corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ...
8 P Q( b) n0 H( L) B* w) Q- j! D H ~; b; f/ O4 ?
您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。
$ G. T7 Q3 P2 c- d
5 Z1 V0 ^5 w+ S9 b安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.: Y" M+ D) O7 u2 l! W
1 D, Q6 \0 W4 X
不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?
" h) z# A2 U: D: s0 n5 D
+ V v0 V) o7 a6 \, h' r+ d另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。. S0 g4 @/ y& ?
" t8 g8 L! y7 l
关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):9 y9 y S: |. U6 }0 N `
Yes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.. Q: v$ p5 @3 g1 A% F" t" E
( ]6 B4 {- {* R5 L6 l
Or maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".# S0 f# z2 z& |' P; R. e
6 O, [9 E; t/ i WBut it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.
0 ^7 j @8 U6 Q
* Y3 S; t5 z& X9 s! z[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|