 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 ( E6 l# Y8 v& M
楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!; n, p& j7 ?8 `1 p2 F, X3 V! ~& _
corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ... 4 T2 j( ]. G+ L$ @/ |
6 X# S+ S. J1 @: r3 l; a$ L
您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。9 A/ a+ \; J8 f* @( V; e9 P
) u+ p( e- {8 i0 y1 C% X
安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless. @9 C& n' p' ?& U+ S
5 k2 l7 _- `9 Q+ t" `
不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?
0 ~; p% e- M. k) e$ n/ _% \+ B+ }! Y6 L+ j/ w
另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。( N3 U" i" ?% s, ^
: C; P1 G9 ]" ~$ H9 ?7 v( g5 Z关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):6 }1 J' q2 S/ y& |+ d) @: d
Yes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.2 z7 j) h8 R+ M9 i3 S% Q! ~
% ]+ u8 q. F2 j" D. d3 \0 IOr maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".: r6 W, j, @) A' [
" w+ d2 i& h2 L, G4 t2 o0 j
But it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.
1 I% J, ?! `# T5 `# f- w
; d7 a& t( A. p3 G( F[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|