 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|
楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表  & ^) w2 B! g( r1 F
楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!! ]( K) T& z K* |* p
corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ...
" }/ L; Y# Z$ n7 D4 a. d8 o( Z
您说的对呀，我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理， 所以听您这一说：我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了， 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。
' o) c% o+ l( S, b- X4 j
9 ]* O5 A/ J0 r6 T$ |. s安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有：可靠性高（故障率低，ｏｒ ｈｉｇｈ ｒｅｌｉａｂｉｌｉｔｙ）, 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.
% j& j9 z9 w- p4 X2 M/ z+ g: ~8 ^/ `( E: }
不过，你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择，Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗？
/ K: M) x0 P4 x7 b
, n$ Y$ V0 N+ B! w另外，“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息，偶要查他个水落石出，好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。
' {' G. y& a7 G% d y& Y' C2 m6 M8 n. m# j! p
关于安全，我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 （SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了）：
9 r1 o3 T N- ^6 {Yes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.
8 Z) S" t$ D2 `" d: ]7 ]- k: r: z i1 n: P
Or maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".& A5 W) n. q2 f2 Z7 A& `& W
! J/ J/ j2 M: b( Z2 {
But it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.7 L# r7 P8 |, ?! o8 F& {1 o
5 w) l) y) ^7 b/ w& I# U J- G0 s+ `
[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|
狗仔卡
发表于 2007-12-9 21:44
提升卡
置顶卡
沉默卡
喧嚣卡
变色卡
显身卡
