 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 
& t( J, V1 F; R! k7 M' E( j* [1 }楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!
: Y- D4 |6 }6 f0 k4 _, ycorolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ... 7 z! u! s! I7 l) z; M* A
: ^$ V: D* l" Y. F# D您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。' g" e, m9 a. m. ~- W
. f3 r+ ?6 g$ \3 v/ P9 b
安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.5 E8 V. [* @7 l Z
* Q) `- c9 O& U- C; C( c; H不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?
3 y9 |5 g1 z% J( Q7 w4 z+ L& L- f/ m N; b/ v5 B
另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。
$ r6 m8 q, F e5 U- H$ ?0 E- @- U! Y8 u D$ y) o9 M
关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):$ B7 ~: S( ], O6 [! P9 g) v
Yes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers./ _& i$ n7 a3 [
# ^; Z7 J3 J h1 uOr maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".
5 Y* O: V* \0 L9 l" o" M0 u4 \4 i) b$ e5 S$ s
But it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.7 p& N2 u, A4 E h, l8 N
) d7 i9 c' X2 `$ k[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|