 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 9 c* ^! P, R5 |+ I% j" x
楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!
) s8 b4 M" x O! [" s2 J: e9 Gcorolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ... / H7 s! |- d* t5 A7 ]
9 _( y& S" S; Y! P# b5 e* d您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。8 W$ X; v5 k6 r e' R; G$ p; w s
4 P) C5 b- C( \* d! F: Z
安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.6 V5 q, b/ Z5 o4 k
% |4 t4 l! [, }8 @
不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?7 j R# @" j! {( Z
& a5 Q8 y% s3 Q' G+ _) `2 t* K另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。
9 [6 e2 A$ l. v- w: c: k* T5 ?8 `2 S, [3 N. u$ R) X9 |1 {, V5 F
关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了): q, d$ q, o& O
Yes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.
& G3 O1 T1 O8 {7 a% ~) c/ E" x) j( S U, M
Or maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".
+ P& o6 K8 ] {" h$ U
( ?( R/ [- \6 |. T6 L& w: _But it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.+ E5 w' l5 R) e' Y3 F8 V. M
1 z- F7 n3 i/ n0 S
[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|