埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 1686|回复: 8

Real Estate Reporters

[复制链接]
鲜花(1) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2007-11-13 09:04 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Attention Real Estate Reporters: : [% m( A4 N0 ?+ `! |( \

  s  I7 f6 s# ^Despite US housing woes Canadian real estate remains upbeat
8 S9 B7 r( v' p/ |    TORONTO, Nov. 5 /CNW/ - Leading real estate experts are predicting the US4 ]( B; \8 V7 j0 w6 C5 r) g3 Q
commercial real estate market will slow in 2008 and follow a similar pattern
* ~% ~8 Z# ?& Z4 f1 Qas the current residential market. However, according to the annual Emerging
1 L; ?7 u+ y4 a6 N- f/ yTrends in Real Estate 2008 report, released by PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC)" ]/ J* d/ z) A/ t
and the Urban Land Institute (ULI), their Canadian counterparts are much more: @* s  y+ c4 S
upbeat.  _4 h$ B  ^, o' A) Y( l  I
    Now in its 29th year, Emerging Trends is the oldest, most highly regarded2 r$ |  h9 o5 a1 V
annual industry outlook for the real estate industry. The report reflects; ~( x) r# \* k( {+ p
interviews with and surveys of more than 600 of the industry's leading real+ r; ]/ ?9 f( I; x# r; M
estate experts, including investors, developers, property company
- X( ?* x% ~( a  t0 G7 m" trepresentatives, lenders, brokers and consultants in both Canada and the US.$ X+ j8 e: a( n/ N. N; J/ T! b
Other versions of this report are conducted in countries around the world4 C& w0 ]. D$ T; r: A& Z0 T
including Asia Pacific and Europe.0 @. K4 j3 n6 L" B' h) u0 O
    According to Chris Potter, PwC partner and leader of the firm's Canadian3 N; r, }+ }% w0 j
Real Estate Tax practice, Canada benefits from a more conservative investment
$ V3 i) c6 P( t; z7 r8 Z0 C, Uenvironment than the US. "In Canada, institution-dominated markets appear to
8 [+ w; ~  G0 ]5 `- M# L' h6 ebe avoiding 'transaction mania', but real estate values have reached record) j- h- ^8 X- o
highs and a strong economy has accelerated tenant demand for space."  I' ?, W! h. A$ D, |, `1 p
    According to American respondents, a healthy correction south of the
! h. R( J, M: n, nborder will likely bypass long-term investors but penalize late-to-the-game
+ T. p. Q/ s+ ospeculators and overleveraged buyers. Canadian respondents to the survey" ^0 i1 |6 p3 W* k. [% l3 Z
remain positive about sidestepping any serious impacts of this possible US% S! E" \& ?2 |; V7 K" e5 V; y
correction. Close to 36% view their prospects for profitability in 2008 to be$ @# G) v! V% }9 x9 y
very good and a further 22.4% say they're excellent.
+ k1 o% N5 F  @2 m    The strongest areas of real estate business activity for Canadian4 O% S; k( y2 g
respondents is predicted to be within real estate services, followed by
# i/ u0 N) P( Q  ycommercial/multifamily development and homebuilding/residential land
7 B7 R: b& M3 g# Hdevelopment. All property sectors share positive prospects across the country  V1 N6 ?5 p/ g, d: U
especially industrial and retail with respondents, on average, stating
' {9 d: [" Q* z# Vdevelopment prospects are expected to be modestly good to good. The
6 c7 D2 }% H5 e4 N, G, I. f6 C! eresidential for-sale market is also expected to fair well, but might need to* z' `4 q! u& C# Y: n' f2 O
take a breather as homebuilders cannot keep up with the current pace and5 x8 ^$ e, a8 V4 u' \2 b9 R0 o2 N
single-family housing looks overpriced./ \2 n5 y( m/ C- L! _
    Office stock is seeing limited inventories and dated product fill up with+ F# `; w, k' x5 s' ?; h
tenants. Except for Montreal, where office vacancies are nearing 9%. Canadian* M  C. d! V- {/ }
metropolitan areas boast below 5% vacancies, and rents have room to push  g& L8 V! h( J6 k( P
higher. The survey is also showing that costs and land scarcity is limiting
, @$ q+ Y* e1 c( N# X, Q) }: l, jnew development. Hotel investment and development prospects are modestly good,
/ V" |5 c+ C" f5 m6 cand most respondents rate this sector either a buy or a hold. Rental4 q0 }0 y- j% e" ^
apartments are doing well in major cities with high immigration flows. Primary6 K6 K$ Q  v9 M
western cities - Vancouver, Calgary, and Edmonton - are veering toward housing: G# ~; u8 o* |+ ?  V9 H/ B
shortages as workers, attracted by a plethora of well-paying jobs, pour into  r. |! a/ w; _+ i- ?1 c; C) h7 `: X+ K
the energy zone. Apartment occupancies are soaring in these areas. Development  H6 |! J7 ]6 ]: c& R5 T
in other regions remains difficult because of costs and land scarcity.
7 f! A# X! Q! s3 {) P+ s
' z* J" j8 a3 U" \6 Y+ ^5 i% R    Canadian Markets to Watch! {6 q+ K7 R: d" T) d9 P( r' q
( A) x3 a0 L7 a1 a9 n9 n
    The report comments on how Canadians like to live and work in central
: [- ]- q: P$ a( y* h: r$ p# D' wcities, as long as they can afford it. If housing is too pricey in 24-hour/ E, V# R# E2 m  p$ ~" @! P, [
neighbourhoods, people move to inner-ring suburbs or beyond and commute back* L8 D* f& E& \8 r
into the cores. Investors, especially the institutions, are concentrated in
: N- P6 e$ H% u- Q$ `5 n" C$ U  rdowntown areas too. Planners and developers focus on infill and more vertical6 I+ E3 H) p8 k$ g$ Z
projects, which reinforce the urban cores. The hot-growth energy cities out
5 H% i$ L0 ?: ^west - Calgary and Edmonton - score the highest ratings for investment& X3 t6 g% e0 @$ J* \' V" ~7 a
prospects, development, and for-sale housing, although it is not certain
4 Z$ Q5 b& i; r1 vwhether the recent announcements on royalties will have any effect on this.3 o, }4 ^& t% d6 R, {- i
Toronto, Canada's premier global pathway city, and Vancouver also have high$ `/ u' Y' F7 R( j2 f
ratings. Ottawa and Montreal follow, with Halifax lagging.
! C6 A9 j9 s& p; |2 X: c* U; P
! v& U3 z3 B' A, \4 }0 x    Calgary/Edmonton
6 o: r$ G9 A" M) N' p
: X6 k  g) b; Z5 `( K; b    Calgary is the Canada's "resource" capital and North America's number-one: u5 ]6 s( _6 O3 u6 K& y
boomtown. Survey respondents foresee strong buys for all sectors: 53.5% give a1 j+ V0 q3 S; [* ~) t  ?
buy recommendation for Hotel Property, 52.8% for Industrial/Distribution,2 X2 L+ |% c) Z
48.1% for Retail and Apartment Residential and 44.6% for Office Property.
: s% _$ y7 O5 }Furthermore, on average the majority of respondents see Calgary For-Sale- E: h. y6 @( N1 @; L
Homebuilding prospects as very good. Edmonton is closely mimicking the( A9 U3 c6 ]) Q6 k! G% M- u
Calgary-style growth wave and as long as demand for energy resources stays
  f* m8 f5 s0 T* ~strong, this market will continue to do well.3 g' t- v; u* I+ X# V
3 F+ f6 ?% Q! V0 x# w
    Vancouver2 I2 k( P" y0 J
1 i. R3 J; Z4 p3 n2 m0 _
    Vancouver's diversified economy is roaring, the mining industry is$ {! Q/ A( U. @8 [, T
booming and the city provides a large port and a high-tech center. Outrageous2 T! o  X1 q  ]) g( V
real estate prices frustrate homebuyers and commercial investors and the
/ X& }- {0 ~. s1 {  Gmarket is extremely hard to crack. The 2010 Winter Olympic Games is also a
) R: ~! Q; `0 I8 X! l" ^5 _! Kgrowth driver and accordingly 44.7% of respondents give Vancouver a buy
+ `. N# @6 J) Orecommendation for Hotel Property. A further 43.5% give a buy Retail, 41.3%. |" y; f5 l3 R7 k
for Industrial/Distribution and 36.7% for Office Property followed by 34.1%
# g( B& E& h0 T, Mfor Apartment Residential property. Vancouver also ranks in the good to very
/ ^9 s" ?" U' v2 _0 Y) Lgood mark for for-sale homebuilding prospects.( c. G5 l1 E5 \9 L1 l
: Y' n$ |" _: c# u' t
    Toronto; W, X: F9 C5 p- Y3 _
& a- l5 z$ J6 d2 }! J9 ?) X; Q
    Toronto ranks as a major global pathway destination, 24-hour city, and
( f" n! d& Y6 q' S! wmanufacturing hub. Compared with other national financial centers, the city is- J0 z6 F! R5 G
relatively inexpensive. However, the rising loonie is hurting manufacturing6 B8 h* M" I! o- d
industries, and clouds over the US economy threaten to stall out momentum.
* r: W) i" K: B' ~5 x! }9 QThree new office towers are under construction, adding 3 million new square& V! ~4 p* _9 }- X2 j. f* U* Y
feet of office space. Notably, Office (49.1%), Industrial (46.2%) and
' J3 M# O. T0 B9 D6 }6 B' r: ZApartments (40.8%) are given solid buys.6 e& j2 m) t& y- ^
4 S4 m6 ~. e+ |+ I% g& I! B
    Montreal6 g- z9 r( z# {% X8 V

5 D* I8 ]8 {; j2 h! W8 u1 ~    Montreal continues to face concerns about market stability and overall7 Z- o+ P  }# S' Y
growth prospects as major companies no longer choose it as a place to set up
) o% s' \! F3 v) hshop. But, plenty of government offices fill space. Of the larger cities in( G6 J5 ~+ T3 Z% Q; g
Canada, Montreal ranks lowest as a "buy" recommendation in all real estate2 _# f4 C5 a+ d) @
sectors. However, respondents generally rated all Montreal real estate sectors
5 `" N: ~  V, \0 bhigher as a "hold" recommendation.
6 w8 Y1 c3 e  f6 D% h4 _
. B0 `0 U, s5 W$ s8 q$ G+ `4 V    The report notes that best bets for investors for the coming years
3 i9 R) G) x5 d% ~include a focus on all property sectors in the high-growth western energy
! z  `% O, [( |2 J4 m; m3 L" nmarkets, hold on central business district office space, develop infill condos
' D) p2 z  k9 w  Snear subways stops in Toronto, buy infill sites wherever you can and invest
6 ^/ ~4 U( S! n6 Eoverseas. Potter concludes, "Domestic opportunities are too limited at current" f3 n- K( |! {2 @  R( x, _2 ?9 y
prices."
# B5 Z' g6 f" [: |: ]    A copy of Emerging Trends in Real Estate(R) 2008 is available at
8 ^1 s# c. e/ J! }$ |www.uli.org or www.pwc.com/imre., S3 z: S: p+ n0 L4 {6 y

/ c/ r0 I9 o* o    About PricewaterhouseCoopers
; o# E8 G. x7 O4 ~
3 |5 q! L3 z4 B9 Y. d2 i0 `9 a    PricewaterhouseCoopers (www.pwc.com) provides industry-focused assurance,
* i& x' ]7 Q- Itax and advisory services to build public trust and enhance value for its! n2 H  W- l2 C+ v
clients and their stakeholders. More than 140,000 people in 149 countries% v$ q5 A" v/ Z( ]. a
across our network share their thinking, experience and solutions to develop5 _# @- z% o$ a% V9 k5 P" V
fresh perspectives and practical advice. Now celebrating 100 years of0 U$ H1 ^0 j4 K5 q7 K! s
excellence in Canada, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (www.pwc.com/ca) and its
8 D+ M' m/ i9 nrelated entities have more than 5,200 partners and staff in offices across the& k  B% }% o  L
country.. u8 j: o/ e+ t1 M6 e, T
    "PricewaterhouseCoopers" refers to PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an Ontario
+ Y4 j6 ^9 u% f, ]6 L: w. z$ ?limited liability partnership, or, as the context requires, the; s2 t6 C) g) K. D+ c( X/ K$ b  |/ a
PricewaterhouseCoopers global network or other member firms of the network,; k9 e- E& F; z$ J+ ~
each of which is a separate and independent legal entity.& ]5 F* e; A7 `0 ~4 i) g
8 }7 p0 L! z% I) l9 p
    About the Urban Land Institute
. B( |  Z2 {( C+ H1 X: Q7 e* l1 T) C/ n" @& A: p% c
    The Urban Land Institute (www.uli.org) is a nonprofit education and7 g  Q- t, O) A" F! U+ V$ R% t
research institute supported by its members. Its mission is to provide2 D0 f" x/ i* v) P( G/ l  r. y
leadership in the responsible use of land and in sustaining and creating
/ ]: {& }9 G* v, v2 W2 Z% t1 B5 dthriving communities worldwide. Established in 1936, the Institute has more1 t' U. z7 m( q: T
than 38,000 members representing all aspects of land use and development. C: H- z6 s3 D# v) u
disciplines.
& K7 b& N' X' v5 E+ ~; F% j    The Urban Land Institute is an active and growing organization in Canada.
4 u1 `  f7 ?. JWith nearly 700 members across the country, Canada's first ULI District, h& h3 i( J) v
Council was established in Toronto in 2005 and a second District Council is1 j9 N" O8 x5 k. Q7 c1 ?
now being formed in British Columbia. The Toronto District Council will be
5 q+ u0 a) {4 I7 Yhosting a special event on Emerging Trends in Real Estate on November 20th,7 ]- \; G' b0 p: j3 g* \. j
2007, featuring Jonathan Miller, the principal author of the report, Blake, A4 _( l" _6 _$ `' I
Hutcheson, President of CB Richard Ellis Canada Ltd., and George Carras,
4 Y6 q. a# m6 z, t# t, i2 u# _' XPresident of RealNet Canada Inc. For more information on this event, please& `: x1 n4 z- Q1 s% z3 P' i
call the Toronto District Council Coordinator at (647) 258-0017, or look on
! L* b* g% @. W+ H. U! c9 Tthe web at www.uli.org/events/index.cfm?id=3066.
0 f! T3 x: E) X/ \0 o) c3 j9 \$ `' [' f2 K" u4 m

5 ?6 n7 H) e* q3 ?/ m# x) ]7 B2 ?& A3 {/ w. x% X7 I3 p' S2 {
For further information: Carolyn Forest, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP,, F. x" M5 N! M( ^+ R$ J
(416) 814-5730, carolyn.forest@ca.pwc.com/ j0 V/ o; d5 H. z% B. }- `
http://www.newswire.ca/en/releas ... r2007/05/c4080.html2 b+ K" v5 A& p$ J) o4 M6 l' u, N( r
7 [0 w" S7 r2 n: H" [/ e
[ 本帖最后由 QWE321 于 2007-11-13 09:08 编辑 ]
鲜花(1) 鸡蛋(0)
 楼主| 发表于 2007-11-13 09:06 | 显示全部楼层
注意房地产记者采访时说: 1 u* A* @/ ?  `, d( `1 [/ U1 T' Y
$ a8 `* O% q- N0 Y2 N9 ^8 z# a
尽管美国住房疾苦加拿大房地产仍乐观9 \# i0 O/ d* {; \
    多伦多, 11月5日电/新华美通/ -领先的房地产专家预测,美国/ `  }& f4 ?8 `+ Q" J$ B0 A
商业房地产市场将缓慢,在2008年和遵循类似模式。
* y  S* z5 B! t" m  ^1 m; F由于目前住宅市场。但是,根据年报新兴
) D, M2 K) f- n" W/ Q3 |2 J9 I4 ^趋势,在房地产, 2008年发布的报告,由罗兵咸永道(预委会)
- b- c5 E) j; W- T# w) M和城市土地研究所(宇力) ,其对应的加拿大得多5 ^3 G; C( i9 b/ q% {% S2 z) n
乐观。
" l6 y$ n) p( Y" n$ P1 s$ X    现在,在其第29届,今年新出现的趋势是历史最悠久,最受尊敬的
7 }5 `# Z0 U8 I, |# a' n年度行业展望房地产业。该报告反映了- F; F( S: [) R7 |: k$ I3 e
访谈和调查, 600多的业内领先的实时1 J' y* W2 t3 Z- u8 ]. H6 T7 `
地产专家,包括投资者,开发商,物业公司
5 G" S7 Q4 I: ~8 q代表,放款人,经纪人和顾问公司在加拿大和美国。 6 d1 i8 |/ ]4 j, ]
其它版本的这份报告是在世界各国纷纷
& w& P8 @- L5 a包括亚太地区和欧洲。
- `# u: D" h1 A0 {7 j  G/ u+ l    据克里斯波特,预委会的合作伙伴和领导者,该公司在加拿大
7 L; C! A  x9 ~2 z3 p房地产税的做法,加拿大受益于一个较保守的投资& m  j! F7 f( h! _: d, L0 I8 j
环境比美国好。 "在加拿大,机构主导的市场,似乎, ?1 p  K' X. B* q1 Z. Q' E' I
可避免'交易躁狂症' ,但房地产的价值,已达到了创纪录7 v" G' h6 K# a: _
高点和强劲的经济,加速了租客的需求空间" 。 & V% Y, _8 o6 Y1 \
    据美国受访者中,一个健康的校正南方的
# y) L/ F# k  \' m边界可能会绕过长线投资者,但惩罚下旬至该游戏
0 _! m" e( ?: h. @1 k炒家overleveraged买家。加拿大民意调查被访者
4 j3 ~7 N: Y7 K5 I( T2 ]1 h继续积极回避任何严重的影响,这可能美国
- C2 S4 U; k: m; Z( g更正。接近36 % ,查看他们的前景,盈利能力在2008年将+ J0 R) X- j+ C4 ?
非常好,并且进一步的22.4 %的人说他们做得很棒。 3 Q; y4 d% O# q4 Y: ]6 _" S/ ]
    最强地区的房地产经营活动,为加拿大7 O# n* k, l6 ~+ o8 i) y
受访者预测,要保持房地产服务,其次是
) z- Z) V0 A( W) Z+ ]7 A$ W# `商业/多家庭的发展和住宅建设/住宅用地( q. j- G) e* S+ `
的发展。所有地产行业分享积极的前景在全国推行
+ z1 A  A  @2 R# t. O8 n尤其是工业和零售与受访者中,平均说明
2 T( F( Z+ m* x; i9 ]3 U的发展前景,预计会虚心好,以良好的。该! I- \$ T* l9 o. `" x2 O
住宅为售后市场预期也将公平好,但可能需要4 P' }/ p, w3 T+ l8 ~8 T9 w  P
以喘息为营建不能配合当前的速度和: r- ^/ L3 F9 b9 W) j* V" I, V7 u, {
单个家庭的房屋期待过高。 / G% P6 B; t* T$ b6 i- V* P% p* n
    办公室的股票是看到有限的库存和过时的产品,填补了4 u) W6 j9 R6 J3 b9 M  r! j
租户。除蒙特利尔,而办公楼空置率接近百分之九。加拿大
" J. f: l" P: c2 ^- m+ J% I% u大都市区夸耀百分之五以下的职位空缺,以及租金的空间,以推动
* g* r, h2 f! ]/ |, N% Q6 A' z5 j更高。调查也显示,成本及土地稀缺限制
; Q. V0 j5 r' x# G, {! A新的发展。酒店投资和发展前景是良好的谦虚, 7 q7 O0 S" l0 n3 r/ N8 E
和大多数受访者比率这个行业无论是购买或持有。出租
  b6 p6 i" p$ H0 W4 z公寓是搞好大城市与高移民流动。小学8 U8 p' h& U% [/ I+ Z! w4 Q$ W
西方城市-温哥华,卡尔加里,埃德蒙顿和-正转向对房屋$ E. a7 @  V4 f' @8 q! A; M. i0 k
短缺的工人,吸引了大量的好报酬优厚的就业岗位,倒入/ @+ S  c  h1 m" M& D3 H* ^
能源区。公寓占用飞涨,在这方面的努力。发展8 r; u$ \# V2 W6 B  t: [
在其他地区仍然很困难,因为成本及土地匮乏。
' {) P5 C7 H7 {2 Y" \/ X0 y# F
' m6 K3 E4 ]! n% U8 L+ h    加拿大市场上观看
, A* o& J' p* {' `5 d( }
9 K. B2 J( D* y9 b    该报告对如何加拿大人愿意生活和工作在中央
! _; O4 }" x# Z城市,只要他们能够负担得起的。如果房屋是太昂贵,在24小时2 E6 y" _5 F2 |
居民区,人们搬到党内环郊区或更远和通勤回2 z# v4 {- u$ N/ ~
进入内核。投资者,特别是机构,都集中在
0 m" t) Y: }5 T5 M7 E6 W* b) T市中心地区。规划者和开发商把重心放在加密和更垂直
' o& D" k8 Q. l4 W0 J" C项目,加强了城市的核心。热点增长的能源城市
* R6 b& P, Q2 Z! a/ b  M西-卡尔加里和埃德蒙顿-评分最高的收视率,为投资. j; h8 ]2 P( \: ?+ X8 v, S2 `
前景,发展,并为出售住房,它虽然是不肯定- O; ~! C  [2 b& z1 \+ r
是否最近宣布对版税将产生什么影响。 8 X; _1 r, V$ w
多伦多,是加拿大首屈一指的全球通路的城市,温哥华等,也有高
1 j0 g9 h: v; ]$ o: S, P( I评级。渥太华和蒙特利尔跟进,与哈利法克斯还相对滞后。
4 _; f1 W; p3 P. g0 o
! x% k$ S9 X3 n/ S: T* J' i    卡尔加里/埃德蒙顿6 J% X8 y5 \+ @, b: e
6 G- C$ u5 B3 q
    卡尔加里是加拿大的"资源"的资本和北美洲的头号$ u  {9 ^" R9 w
新兴都市。调查的受访者预计,强买,为各阶层人士: 53.5 %作
! S) [8 M8 b4 X6 ?购买建议,为酒店物业,为52.8 % ,为工业/配送, 5 m4 C0 ~% U  \( S
48.1 % ,零售和公寓住宅和44.6 % ,为办公室的财产。 % R& ]6 F( V) D, R+ }
此外,每日平均有超过半数受访见卡尔加里为售后
! S& W0 W% _# t* n! R" }住宅建设前景是非常好的。埃德蒙顿正密切模仿了$ C5 Q3 [, s$ g: j* I( I
卡尔加里式的增长浪潮,并且只要能源需求的资源留: t% |+ y1 \+ f+ u" K6 E0 s2 i
强大的,这个市场将继续向好。 ; v& p" ^6 c* }7 N7 N* p
. X8 l7 m7 L5 q3 N1 t0 _" P  k5 i
    温哥华6 H; a/ N( N. _" P7 f) I* E1 a( h
4 c/ f* Q1 N( ]' |( E
    温哥华的多元化的经济,是波涛汹涌,采矿业% j8 D7 ?9 a+ T2 u9 Q
红红火火的城市提供了一个大型港口和高科技中心。岂有此理" w. l  q9 D9 H) \/ g' o% ~6 i2 W4 e
房地产价格挫败购房者和商业投资者和" M; ^7 q$ u% ]! s5 N. V% _1 ^
市场是非常难裂纹。 2010年冬季奥运会也是一个) g3 H1 x# p& s
主要成长动力,并据此44.7 %的受访者给予温哥华买进9 [* H0 g& B" r# f% l$ T0 P
建议对酒店的财产。另有43.5 %给予买进零售, 41.3 % , b! e& c! n# z. X% ]
工业/分销和36.7 %办公室财产其次是34.1 % 3 o: f, s$ y/ Y& }7 P, k( Y
为公寓住宅物业。温哥华也名列在好的很
% e1 ]7 x. K, l5 X3 h9 [( }良好的标志,为买卖房屋建筑的前景。 6 b% c5 p2 Y1 ^8 Q

2 |  f% h0 b+ ?    多伦多+ w+ w& [8 C8 B& h: b, D
- `* f8 r4 \6 @
    多伦多队伍作为一项重大的全球通路目的地后, 24小时市,   J  U) X% \# ], k. r0 S5 D
制造业枢纽。相较于其他国家的金融中心,该市正
1 c5 I+ |- C: ^4 x; k价格相对低廉。不过,加元上涨是伤害制造: h' l4 T( e! r9 f. ^6 _
工业,并云在美国经济的威胁,以贩出的势头。
6 }# G2 b" b9 M% h$ Q三个新的办公大楼正在建设中,增加3万个新广场7 O+ S; {4 f/ z5 @# d
英尺的办公空间。值得注意的是,办公室( 49.1 % ) ,工业( 46.2 % )和! e! d1 E7 J! K1 q4 {8 J: }/ }
公寓( 40.8 % ) ,给出了坚实的收购。
) |) q+ e! g) I6 i
% R: G( L8 b0 m" z9 |0 Z5 ^$ s    蒙特利尔
) X. b0 r1 @; X4 Y- @- @( z1 ^; x9 n
    蒙特利尔仍然面临着关注市场的稳定及整体
8 {1 H8 _0 s( U( X9 U3 Q. n% j% j' j经济增长的前景,因为各大公司不再选择香港作为一个地方成立# a; t5 P) U3 J* M+ n/ L" x
店。但是,大量的政府办公室填写空间。比较大的城市
7 H  M! Z, K: o( O2 }加拿大,蒙特利尔排名最低的是一个"买进"的建议,在所有房地产
+ F2 C0 P  ]  Z# H部门。不过,受访者普遍都被评为蒙特利尔房地产行业
2 L2 d4 j% ~4 D6 `7 k0 s/ G1 b5 R高为"持有"建议。 / D# o$ g, o$ c* Q  L; p
1 v4 U$ d  ^6 f5 \
    报告指出,最佳的赌注,为投资者在未来几年$ x0 T/ |! h* S
包括重点放在所有地产行业在高速发展的西方能源! ~4 R  k* h7 e6 S  n) K6 u
市场,忍着中央商务区的办公场所,制定加密公寓! a  @% N  @) ?4 ~1 }; B
附近的行人隧道,停在多伦多,购买加密地点在何处,你可以和投资7 b! Y4 s3 ^* Z& S% Y
海外。波特的结论是, "国内的机会太有限,在目前的0 [0 Z% u1 N9 g5 ~* x
价格" 。 7 h% E6 a( \& J( \/ M
    一本新趋势的房地产( r )的, 2008年是于
. I- A! a5 ~2 i. }$ B& K* hwww.uli.org或www.pwc.com /伊姆雷。 6 E6 m. {0 `8 f. Z  ^! K
9 Y  q1 Y  O  E, Z  k6 g) a' y, M
    约罗兵咸永道* N4 H" _* m# g' N6 Z' {; W

4 N9 Z5 T! B  z. y; M    罗兵咸永道( www.pwc.com )提供行业为重点的保证, " D3 v- H4 X: R& L. D) M/ R" A
税务和咨询服务,以建立公众的信任和提高其值
+ b! n" a0 R/ y- v( K客户和他们的利益相关者。超过14万人,在149个国家
4 i2 ?. W% d1 \跨越我们的网络分享他们的思想,经验和解决方案开发7 z. o( F2 \9 z" }% g
新的观点和切实可行的意见。现在庆祝百年的
% I# B+ S; l7 J卓越在加拿大,罗兵咸永道物流园( www.pwc.com / ca )和其1 y" Q" p' }" f7 v) h  G) ?
相关实体有超过5200名合作伙伴和工作人员在全国各地的办公室
2 A" o" ^5 l/ b- R国。
1 r1 \; k1 g# W' l" p& e7 |% h' s9 I     "罗兵咸永道" ,是指以罗兵咸永道物流园,安大略
# C3 v/ L7 V. b: F2 j! j7 i有限责任合伙,或视情况需要,
' s& s+ N0 x. F普华永道的全球网络,还是其他会员公司的网络, % u# l; F' u- W6 S
每年这是一个独立的法律实体。 ' g# B, n; G3 x& I7 k# b

7 V/ h- I+ T0 w$ G: D7 E    关于城市土地研究所所长
" z" C/ @3 F3 |; p
* `: G. `8 A/ b2 y3 \    城市土地学会( www.uli.org )是一个非赢利性的教育和, S& m$ U2 e* R6 U
研究院的支持,它的成员。它的使命是提供
; V& l* F) u: Y4 z( b0 ^$ s4 R& F9 p领导,在以负责任的方式使用土地,并维持和创造
" I* X. n" e0 `9 a蓬勃发展的社区在世界各地。成立于1936年,研究所更
  l" ?" [. r! d# C超过38000人,代表各方面的土地利用与发展' b) d$ p; r, C/ y3 U# y5 B) I
学科。
( v' g6 K8 Q; n) G  t    城市土地学会是一个积极的和不断扩大的组织在加拿大。 9 {4 i& s4 V) {
与近700名委员在全国推行,加拿大的第赫内斯区
# u! _. e0 {* f/ G$ O% C: t  k理事会成立于多伦多,在2005年和第二个区议会
6 U* I& }$ ~0 t* \5 p现在正在形成,在不列颠哥伦比亚省。多伦多区会, E& Y: B/ n( C" e4 q
主办了一次特别活动,对新出现的趋势,在房地产上11月20日, 3 L5 C' Z: a- }8 i- q2 @+ _- i3 d& O
2007年,包括乔纳森米勒,主要报告的作者,卜力7 @5 E; @1 W1 d1 @2 [1 D
资讯公司总裁世邦魏理仕加拿大有限公司,和乔治carras ,
! ]& T  B4 ~9 o总统realnet加拿大公司的更多信息,对这一事件,请
! v$ i( Z* u6 Q3 O% O致电多伦多区议会事务协调员( 647 ) 258-0017 ,或一脸无奈
) {/ Z& N; x$ n6 M% ^; f; _网站www.uli.org/events/index.cfm?id=3066
; C5 d. p; K% y! B% K& \9 O1 W, M# Y0 n* B

3 G% T( Y% B- E8 J& o
" m2 i+ u! O- A更多资讯:卡罗琳森林,罗兵咸永道物流园,
! J! a5 P  n2 f: ?6 U( 416 ) 814-5730 , carolyn.forest @ ca.pwc.com
鲜花(4348) 鸡蛋(18)
发表于 2007-11-13 09:10 | 显示全部楼层
楼主的这个翻译软件好。
鲜花(3) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2007-11-13 09:15 | 显示全部楼层

Up

老杨团队 追求完美
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2007-11-13 11:20 | 显示全部楼层

4 [8 N) i; n: @; o' g6 D- q. [9 t% o" Y
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2007-11-13 13:54 | 显示全部楼层
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2007-11-13 15:37 | 显示全部楼层
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
看涨派的忽悠水平有很大提高,请继续努力。
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2007-11-13 19:04 | 显示全部楼层
鲜花(49) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2007-11-13 21:54 | 显示全部楼层

# g4 I3 K" P' cu
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2025-11-5 01:25 , Processed in 0.126681 second(s), 25 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表