 鲜花( 79)  鸡蛋( 4)
|
本帖最后由 youngguncn 于 2016-3-1 00:45 编辑
" w/ `! p& b5 l% W
2 R( K& B& Z) H& B: |4 x! y
# j" s( E6 ~( J F8 Z7 c* n第二个罪是criminal negligent homicide,是 class E不是manslaghter,class B,你就是把manslaughter和homocide搞混了。
' E! l% D) L7 v' X% G1 [3 A纽约没有criminally neugligent manslaughter,如果有犯罪行为的manslaughter,是顶级重罪,像你所说的仅次于谋杀的重罪。这个在纽约叫一级误杀。梁Sir没有被charge这个。梁 Sir如果被charge这个罪名而且成立,至少刑期是4年,而不是说得0到15年。; t! ~: m% @3 g) N. K/ |: r3 J4 m
梁 sir被convict的五个罪名是以严重性排列的,第一个是C级重罪,0到15年,第二个是E级重罪,0到4年。9 k: \& u! O0 f) q. z" r
梁 sir没有,同时也没有DA起诉梁 sir有任何犯罪意图和行为,梁 sir也没有,同时也没有DA起诉梁 sir有主观意愿去误杀小黑。/ ]6 I3 D5 |" }/ {
梁 sir的第一个罪我已经贴出来了。% e9 G H9 o b( B+ G& t" a8 `& F
" |9 N- N! `) D4 U7 q$ h& h
梁 sir被判的第二个罪是这个
7 @. O2 A' R. BS 125.10 Criminally negligent homicide.5 {" q: m2 ~8 `: \! y, u
A person is guilty of criminally negligent homicide when, with- y2 Q: V7 e- M: o- z! t& Q9 j
criminal negligence, he causes the death of another person.3 y7 @- O( y3 {
Criminally negligent homicide is a class E felony.. v. t$ G2 [5 t0 V9 j. b+ \' [
criminally negligent的有多严重呢。NYC是这么排的。
9 m; x. x1 w1 A# N. K最严重是intentionally,然后是knowingly,然后是reckless,最轻的是这个criminally negligent。比不小心还轻,因为太轻了,但是还确实怪你,没办法了,来了个这个表述。就像你在TNT买东西,但是你还是食物中毒了。1.大统华把保质期擦了重打,这肯定是故意的。2.大统华知道这批货过期了,没换,3.大统华太忙了,想换没来得及就被你买了。4.criminally neglegent,大统华正在换货,你也不知道,顺手拿起来换下来的货买了,这个根犯罪一点关系都没有。
# P. w% e! K& Q3 n3 l+ ?7 `5 S* g9 W" T, F/ ~- k$ k
如果这个你还不理解,那我干脆都贴上来吧。/ U, g3 J) ~! d) q4 R
你说的那个manslaughter在NYC是下面这个。梁 sir要是这个,整个NYPD估计可能都要上街的。都轮不到华人。2 d6 i' J0 M7 w
8 g/ e! ]4 o( `( K+ S
S 125.20 Manslaughter in the first degree.
5 L' A7 {# @# e+ f1 z% q& d P! C) L A person is guilty of manslaughter in the first degree when:3 X6 p6 C S1 \* h4 j
1. With intent to cause serious physical injury to another person, he
( }0 j/ x3 g! r6 L c" ]" @causes the death of such person or of a third person; or# N' Y# A8 o* J) u
2. With intent to cause the death of another person, he causes the/ j/ |5 T* J2 m9 ?" `. b
death of such person or of a third person under circumstances which do
' F2 k! A& e' |0 ~not constitute murder because he acts under the influence of extreme
6 H5 K% b* n+ }4 M zemotional disturbance, as defined in paragraph (a) of subdivision one of2 v: f5 [8 _3 v. j( e& x
section 125.25. The fact that homicide was committed under the influence# h# P! e! i E
of extreme emotional disturbance constitutes a mitigating circumstance! C# Z; h8 ?9 a( J6 G0 U% ~& o
reducing murder to manslaughter in the first degree and need not be; q" _) U" D% P1 i
proved in any prosecution initiated under this subdivision; or3 v, W8 ~$ }, V& V& i! }
3. He commits upon a female pregnant for more than twenty-four weeks* ]0 b% \0 t9 B$ p L. \# ~
an abortional act which causes her death, unless such abortional act is
( Q( |# m0 n7 t$ R Cjustifiable pursuant to subdivision three of section 125.05; or8 }" `& \8 S" W
4. Being eighteen years old or more and with intent to cause physical
) \( ^7 M+ i* ~" \injury to a person less than eleven years old, the defendant recklessly- T7 }# S( B" g
engages in conduct which creates a grave risk of serious physical injury: a; K9 `3 F3 \6 \
to such person and thereby causes the death of such person.
8 B( r6 s! A3 d4 u" E7 g Manslaughter in the first degree is a class B felony.
( [5 C4 e0 y( ^9 W4 o |
|