 鲜花( 79)  鸡蛋( 4)
|
本帖最后由 youngguncn 于 2016-3-1 00:45 编辑 ( P0 }/ m5 E- P! m5 U
/ A6 X/ ]0 }' T! E4 r% x% A8 p+ `& Z, O3 l9 M/ B
第二个罪是criminal negligent homicide,是 class E不是manslaghter,class B,你就是把manslaughter和homocide搞混了。5 R0 v$ ?# Y, m' \
纽约没有criminally neugligent manslaughter,如果有犯罪行为的manslaughter,是顶级重罪,像你所说的仅次于谋杀的重罪。这个在纽约叫一级误杀。梁Sir没有被charge这个。梁 Sir如果被charge这个罪名而且成立,至少刑期是4年,而不是说得0到15年。9 D, ]% N1 s, I+ Q! [
梁 sir被convict的五个罪名是以严重性排列的,第一个是C级重罪,0到15年,第二个是E级重罪,0到4年。
) h2 n% C' L; W, R梁 sir没有,同时也没有DA起诉梁 sir有任何犯罪意图和行为,梁 sir也没有,同时也没有DA起诉梁 sir有主观意愿去误杀小黑。
# n8 o! Y6 j* j6 Q1 M梁 sir的第一个罪我已经贴出来了。5 S# F: L$ f8 F3 x
! Y4 a& r3 s" s4 h; W, J
梁 sir被判的第二个罪是这个
Z4 f9 ]% E# T4 Z; o j$ q) U: [S 125.10 Criminally negligent homicide.
4 O2 f/ O$ p$ w* a2 b' \ A person is guilty of criminally negligent homicide when, with
- |( D& D- P2 G- u b8 Dcriminal negligence, he causes the death of another person.6 P. K/ n( j! G, f8 x
Criminally negligent homicide is a class E felony.
. D! L- g' R: ^6 Xcriminally negligent的有多严重呢。NYC是这么排的。
1 n6 R& N" C8 B最严重是intentionally,然后是knowingly,然后是reckless,最轻的是这个criminally negligent。比不小心还轻,因为太轻了,但是还确实怪你,没办法了,来了个这个表述。就像你在TNT买东西,但是你还是食物中毒了。1.大统华把保质期擦了重打,这肯定是故意的。2.大统华知道这批货过期了,没换,3.大统华太忙了,想换没来得及就被你买了。4.criminally neglegent,大统华正在换货,你也不知道,顺手拿起来换下来的货买了,这个根犯罪一点关系都没有。( R+ G t6 G# d6 F- W
% [& O0 ~+ s9 k' a/ _) k: z1 D如果这个你还不理解,那我干脆都贴上来吧。
+ g- h+ J( d6 F0 \/ B5 |) S1 n你说的那个manslaughter在NYC是下面这个。梁 sir要是这个,整个NYPD估计可能都要上街的。都轮不到华人。
% |; r) \% h1 J3 w* L9 v
5 A K& Z. W( C3 [6 ]S 125.20 Manslaughter in the first degree.
3 A, k$ S9 k+ O* K A person is guilty of manslaughter in the first degree when:5 B: Q9 r& w. L/ ^7 H$ D3 V+ P
1. With intent to cause serious physical injury to another person, he
. X6 D$ U, s5 l( @2 e+ wcauses the death of such person or of a third person; or
) y& u! C% R- T 2. With intent to cause the death of another person, he causes the" m1 x% l8 b( v3 [! ?9 V, O. b
death of such person or of a third person under circumstances which do
& V- F. p' @3 C& y/ Y# q5 @+ Ynot constitute murder because he acts under the influence of extreme- l6 L8 J" Y$ O) y
emotional disturbance, as defined in paragraph (a) of subdivision one of
; Y+ ]( ?# S. P0 ]section 125.25. The fact that homicide was committed under the influence
) I |+ N! Y( [$ S* K+ tof extreme emotional disturbance constitutes a mitigating circumstance
& m( d* x% o8 i$ Zreducing murder to manslaughter in the first degree and need not be
, \& J# }* Y( R h4 [proved in any prosecution initiated under this subdivision; or
3 d8 j/ E6 f7 J* P. w! p; q 3. He commits upon a female pregnant for more than twenty-four weeks9 @1 }7 P7 f; v3 n; F7 }# Y# @6 I" O
an abortional act which causes her death, unless such abortional act is
, p# ^# Z% o+ D p! ijustifiable pursuant to subdivision three of section 125.05; or1 \7 u" o! j6 l* K) m9 O
4. Being eighteen years old or more and with intent to cause physical3 |2 A3 _7 a" g& z p
injury to a person less than eleven years old, the defendant recklessly4 J. X( t9 l3 F% R: W( W! n' _
engages in conduct which creates a grave risk of serious physical injury
, Q; g+ b N" P! N& h; [to such person and thereby causes the death of such person.$ \0 Y- G5 H; ?+ z& \( v/ l
Manslaughter in the first degree is a class B felony." U" Y% n1 y) e' Q3 ^4 Q' v2 ^
|
|