 鲜花( 1181)  鸡蛋( 48)
|
. E/ w! h' Y# X6 ~: ]1 n& z
% p r% A' |% u, t" ~3 q7 A3 [0 m诺特利2018年9月5号在和小土豆面谈中要求小土豆立法。白纸黑字有图片。5 w$ g% \, }- ^( k
阅读英文新闻对你来说很困难吗？请看文章红字部分。
# X. j/ D* T9 Z0 s; d+ Y9 [' b8 y; c# k$ l4 y
https://calgaryherald.com/news/p ... f-pipeline-collapse
/ m+ d" ^+ f4 C; Q" X0 f4 V" [ g! ~
Braid: Trudeau sees the sunny side of pipeline collapse W& \ r. L3 o$ d
9 ^9 B: B- z6 S3 y8 n m6 @Oh, so that’s it. The pipeline rejection is just a bump in the road. In fact, you could even see it as proof of just how robust the Liberal approval process is.
5 T& H" `7 d) _, N1 Y' d, u& ]; L% B/ c9 g% q6 z
That’s what a person might think, listening to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau on Wednesday, as he actually tried to turn this mess into an affirmation of his ideals.
: W! {7 [' h& B8 f8 }& D
0 A, w7 Q' U% D( ]& `+ WHe said he’s “disappointed” with the ruling, mind you. He knows it “really hurt” Alberta. Ottawa will do better and meet the Federal Court of Appeal’s concerns.
5 u! v, u! u* U) x7 W6 M5 ~+ z, X k0 R/ N0 ~: |
At one point, he slammed the Harper government’s approach and said “the court has just confirmed that was never going to work.”- F& z$ k2 M- `: [. f% b
8 [7 q/ n B! _3 ?( @) p5 VActually, the court ruled on a Trudeau government approach that was never going to work.$ W* r" t; t* k8 |
( g1 d% A7 c i- ~! LBut the court also agrees with Trudeau on the need for rigour, it seems.6 n& l. ]% [ }( {5 s- W$ V
+ R! v: H+ c8 k
“This is something I’ve been saying for a long time, that the only way to get projects built in this country is to do them responsibly.”/ m0 Q! ~ {- P. c$ ?
$ K! |! }. \4 \+ I' fPremier Rachel Notley, distancing herself from her favourite ally, demands a legislative cannonade, a federal bill to reassert the former approval. She decries the “regulatory merry-go-round that isn’t going to help anybody.”/ [4 J$ K4 _, X4 ^( |3 L9 H9 l
" e) @8 o6 Q, q5 u3 X0 v
7 j9 Z, M8 D0 l2 E) P* g( p3 E, ]& s$ ]
The job now is to get the project back to where it was last Wednesday, before the court ruling came down.$ {6 R' _% n# m- Z& t$ y
8 Y4 L. F' u- d; d: K$ K) h! ?( gIt had been signed and sealed. This was an officially approved interprovincial pipeline, ramping up to full construction.. B; |* K! R) v( \5 J* d/ X F" _
+ j B% o' n; }( L2 N6 k
Now it’s nothing. The approval process even overturned a federal cabinet order. The workers will be going home, the contractors packing up.
6 I5 k, b6 l6 N
4 E* ]+ q; K9 E8 m; z7 q/ WGetting back to “YES” (that is, last Wednesday) will take time and money. And nobody knows what further legal horrors might await, even after another approval.5 a: s" v j3 Z, T
5 r: U* L5 }& Y! A" \8 ~
But Trudeau paints it as a simple matter of improving consultation and looking into maritime transportation.
0 ^( r( m; m3 j2 H( W5 d& y$ c8 j
Trudeau also says that if Ottawa hadn’t bought the project, it would be dead today.$ O& L8 U/ s/ r! ^+ ?
8 T9 n- W! f" D& J
Actually, if Ottawa hadn’t purchased it for $4.5 billion in May, the assets would now be a much better buy.: q0 N5 ~( |/ b
$ Z0 P! d; O( o$ r$ k( U( A, e3 k
“Why didn’t the federal government wait until after the ruling?” retired oil and gas analyst Gordon Tait asks in an email.
" J4 T8 K) S' W( J5 K" m4 K# [5 I( n+ d9 I8 m: I
“They could have acquired the pipeline for a lower price than they paid a few months ago. There was no downside in waiting.& N) e$ L% _# a- s9 Q i
8 h% d' w) j! F5 i1 @7 z; e“If the expansion had been approved, Kinder Morgan shareholders would have paid for the expansion — not Canadian taxpayers.”8 }/ z, o, h( t0 n+ s: F$ C0 }
) y( {% ?; ]# ], k4 ?( T8 E3 ?4 ~
|
|
楼主: 驻足闻香
狗仔卡
发表于 2018-9-6 23:08
显身卡
小黄还有功夫吵架。
明白人 
