 鲜花( 1181)  鸡蛋( 48)
|
Outlander 发表于 2018-9-10 09:40
- {" D, z6 ~5 _0 i I: D: ^8 Y6 L你这算偷换概念吗，诺特利什么时候要求总理立法了？
' A+ m* d/ A4 c% z- O4 n" m8 u; k4 S觉得土豆选择不立法，是你自己的猜测，我也可以说 ...
$ n, @6 f0 g' N
+ A1 m( }% `9 p/ Y诺特利2018年9月5号在和小土豆面谈中要求小土豆立法。白纸黑字有图片。
, M% {3 K, S, k3 W" P阅读英文新闻对你来说很困难吗？请看文章红字部分。6 [$ E! R9 ~: B$ ]- \: U3 ?/ Q
) `& T0 j+ t: Z
https://calgaryherald.com/news/p ... f-pipeline-collapse; ~4 d/ n& g+ Q4 D+ C% |! F# C
; y% H# f) H* b/ m, a* l
Braid: Trudeau sees the sunny side of pipeline collapse5 e+ d5 M) d+ X* a' `, B( S
9 ]5 N8 @9 C/ @% x# H7 ~
Oh, so that’s it. The pipeline rejection is just a bump in the road. In fact, you could even see it as proof of just how robust the Liberal approval process is.
2 F: M2 m$ g( _0 u$ m% Q" y) P/ x
4 _7 f. o% M+ p3 Y! ]That’s what a person might think, listening to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau on Wednesday, as he actually tried to turn this mess into an affirmation of his ideals.1 o) H6 ], N' m# F3 }
" l0 ~9 Q$ H" C m
He said he’s “disappointed” with the ruling, mind you. He knows it “really hurt” Alberta. Ottawa will do better and meet the Federal Court of Appeal’s concerns. X) ~9 L! }; U% q1 i( x! t8 ]
- \$ x, f1 N2 e% ?
At one point, he slammed the Harper government’s approach and said “the court has just confirmed that was never going to work.”
4 e" Z& J5 V/ ~7 u j! Z4 ^9 h: {5 ^8 f
Actually, the court ruled on a Trudeau government approach that was never going to work.5 G' N0 @% f; ]
. g8 y. n" R" u5 }
But the court also agrees with Trudeau on the need for rigour, it seems.
1 Q& V; T/ l& B
, ]& X) U/ b7 p) n7 h“This is something I’ve been saying for a long time, that the only way to get projects built in this country is to do them responsibly.”
. y8 a- p+ i& ^( D/ _: A1 k0 A$ L. x2 y2 `
Premier Rachel Notley, distancing herself from her favourite ally, demands a legislative cannonade, a federal bill to reassert the former approval. She decries the “regulatory merry-go-round that isn’t going to help anybody.”' f' v. [' z6 m" d2 P$ p( [7 P1 ?
- s& ~5 O* w) I. ^8 u
 , o# q5 A" Q ?: D( G
/ T( Z M( h# [
The job now is to get the project back to where it was last Wednesday, before the court ruling came down.
) u2 L- Q3 K& t6 Y/ O" {8 a
5 y6 m2 a5 y4 _* AIt had been signed and sealed. This was an officially approved interprovincial pipeline, ramping up to full construction.
, P; }5 | f. y5 i9 [/ {3 j4 q) Y) G$ k0 T$ E) X
Now it’s nothing. The approval process even overturned a federal cabinet order. The workers will be going home, the contractors packing up.
2 t; |: h6 t9 C
& T7 m- |3 E5 f0 q( a! zGetting back to “YES” (that is, last Wednesday) will take time and money. And nobody knows what further legal horrors might await, even after another approval.- B/ k- [( F8 Q- z. r
9 P" B( r& T9 f. b* mBut Trudeau paints it as a simple matter of improving consultation and looking into maritime transportation.
* P4 C" T+ V f: T# V& E: l2 x8 C- \. q& W. ]# n" I
Trudeau also says that if Ottawa hadn’t bought the project, it would be dead today.
1 L9 j, @9 n% }) f- E) C4 Q9 b S' Z7 ?5 U
Actually, if Ottawa hadn’t purchased it for $4.5 billion in May, the assets would now be a much better buy.
( p3 S& B' b9 t7 L! W1 q" \: h& T9 q: g/ X& k/ ]: Y
“Why didn’t the federal government wait until after the ruling?” retired oil and gas analyst Gordon Tait asks in an email.
4 X. y3 a) r- x( H0 R* [4 M, Z4 B/ ]- L" }* D
“They could have acquired the pipeline for a lower price than they paid a few months ago. There was no downside in waiting.
/ L" `# U( j1 a( F8 Z
! S( W3 _/ t! S" W! N“If the expansion had been approved, Kinder Morgan shareholders would have paid for the expansion — not Canadian taxpayers.”7 H- s* t+ ?: E$ Z n, B5 R0 u
9 {4 Z8 z7 z! r/ G |
|
楼主: 驻足闻香
狗仔卡
发表于 2018-9-6 23:08
显身卡
小黄还有功夫吵架。
明白人 $ C6 G7 K. _ G1 |2 Q1 \" n
