 鲜花( 1181)  鸡蛋( 48)
|
4 ^" B |& o( E( j0 q k+ J- n; ?# D
1 c# l1 g- [: c' E/ I
诺特利2018年9月5号在和小土豆面谈中要求小土豆立法。白纸黑字有图片。% I+ h$ E3 y: m: d( p1 R. y
阅读英文新闻对你来说很困难吗？请看文章红字部分。
, J, S ~" G9 P8 B* `- _$ k" [
. D; M" h& V; h8 \https://calgaryherald.com/news/p ... f-pipeline-collapse- r9 Q1 }3 k% g0 @( s# @) e. j. L6 e% R
~/ ~/ n8 O1 a, o0 TBraid: Trudeau sees the sunny side of pipeline collapse: P; y. b5 @/ ^, S" P3 X
, A, X) T1 _2 V8 ~6 nOh, so that’s it. The pipeline rejection is just a bump in the road. In fact, you could even see it as proof of just how robust the Liberal approval process is.
1 S6 g4 F7 L& L2 n8 k# T3 N2 T8 W$ o* K% y: o, z
That’s what a person might think, listening to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau on Wednesday, as he actually tried to turn this mess into an affirmation of his ideals.7 w1 h8 V; d4 }" `/ ?# m
2 b3 m. z2 D/ U. T2 {- t& ~( uHe said he’s “disappointed” with the ruling, mind you. He knows it “really hurt” Alberta. Ottawa will do better and meet the Federal Court of Appeal’s concerns.3 Z$ O& j4 M# C% |$ ?' u9 R
- P5 X. W# B" K6 _At one point, he slammed the Harper government’s approach and said “the court has just confirmed that was never going to work.”
6 r9 S3 X3 u# {% D* d/ j& _' l, ]! j4 l7 g4 N. N9 k
Actually, the court ruled on a Trudeau government approach that was never going to work.
# V1 x0 U4 L! q1 ^ Y5 O" Y
" h) g; W+ T1 U5 u; g) GBut the court also agrees with Trudeau on the need for rigour, it seems.
' j0 u9 ~) c- L! M# h# p: ^$ {: w+ W
“This is something I’ve been saying for a long time, that the only way to get projects built in this country is to do them responsibly.”- b/ ]/ ]9 X* G& }. a
/ \# O/ v/ {0 jPremier Rachel Notley, distancing herself from her favourite ally, demands a legislative cannonade, a federal bill to reassert the former approval. She decries the “regulatory merry-go-round that isn’t going to help anybody.”8 d. p0 P+ E1 ?3 a6 L: R1 q% k
T7 k2 L3 ^0 `/ d+ p- Z. X
' x* g* Y- B% ]# X6 ?" A, \+ V9 t3 B9 S, j% D" o5 i
The job now is to get the project back to where it was last Wednesday, before the court ruling came down.( {7 E3 X! b/ ]/ w% i. m0 n0 c i
7 C0 m2 i1 A9 O/ c; e
It had been signed and sealed. This was an officially approved interprovincial pipeline, ramping up to full construction.; R" _7 a# |5 ?$ G! [5 a
7 n. F6 O) p1 o/ t7 {- C# D& oNow it’s nothing. The approval process even overturned a federal cabinet order. The workers will be going home, the contractors packing up.
3 l- @% L- ?/ J
! E5 A# ^. ?$ H9 X2 GGetting back to “YES” (that is, last Wednesday) will take time and money. And nobody knows what further legal horrors might await, even after another approval.6 c, _& q) f( N7 R* z) d
! y! a* x% ] V) V2 C
But Trudeau paints it as a simple matter of improving consultation and looking into maritime transportation.) j4 S# O( k" E- \) m0 q- Z# {0 Z
( O/ l! O6 V3 J: j5 eTrudeau also says that if Ottawa hadn’t bought the project, it would be dead today.
' j) B6 I" I1 g; I2 _4 H+ C7 L
Actually, if Ottawa hadn’t purchased it for $4.5 billion in May, the assets would now be a much better buy.; J7 x9 R4 a$ I1 V
' L9 f! T0 i1 z# F6 `0 `0 x: L: r“Why didn’t the federal government wait until after the ruling?” retired oil and gas analyst Gordon Tait asks in an email.& {5 I( i; }* z6 A' x5 `! F$ o- {
, D/ {8 p: ^2 \6 V' T$ J
“They could have acquired the pipeline for a lower price than they paid a few months ago. There was no downside in waiting." ~) }" s( W& L$ F+ v9 Y
: k3 X7 P- | j+ J“If the expansion had been approved, Kinder Morgan shareholders would have paid for the expansion — not Canadian taxpayers.”! X/ |) q: H# w" X
, l1 X# u2 G( h# `2 G1 Q |
|
楼主: 驻足闻香
狗仔卡
发表于 2018-9-6 23:08
显身卡
小黄还有功夫吵架。
明白人 
