 鲜花( 1181)  鸡蛋( 48)
|
. R& ~& E5 B, E1 g) ^6 G" L/ N6 P$ ?4 g4 h
诺特利2018年9月5号在和小土豆面谈中要求小土豆立法。白纸黑字有图片。/ c: `8 B5 g( e: Y. t1 {3 C
阅读英文新闻对你来说很困难吗？请看文章红字部分。
9 K4 Z* m& i8 x, b; S' n+ F8 |9 i; g" G/ Q
https://calgaryherald.com/news/p ... f-pipeline-collapse* ~5 w$ _. R- ]2 l5 \
2 x3 H c% G2 A2 P8 aBraid: Trudeau sees the sunny side of pipeline collapse/ U+ z" a5 z, i; {! Y$ f/ n& o
5 W2 F+ T+ J. y4 e+ B; ~) N) L
Oh, so that’s it. The pipeline rejection is just a bump in the road. In fact, you could even see it as proof of just how robust the Liberal approval process is.
3 Q+ s7 @5 h( t+ O. @3 j2 z# T/ I+ `6 Z( S: w' \6 z6 {
That’s what a person might think, listening to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau on Wednesday, as he actually tried to turn this mess into an affirmation of his ideals.
$ J! g/ @0 v4 s( p: X+ E1 J% |$ n8 t6 x% E0 l
He said he’s “disappointed” with the ruling, mind you. He knows it “really hurt” Alberta. Ottawa will do better and meet the Federal Court of Appeal’s concerns.6 M2 U$ n0 g- _" k
; E+ f" L% v& F ?9 B4 O: g
At one point, he slammed the Harper government’s approach and said “the court has just confirmed that was never going to work.”
/ S/ {& ?- j0 G
) {+ C' k( h/ {9 w5 w% Q1 ^) KActually, the court ruled on a Trudeau government approach that was never going to work.+ k2 p8 M$ V7 z6 [( c. j9 |- f
. l* {5 b1 y+ IBut the court also agrees with Trudeau on the need for rigour, it seems.
8 }" e8 s& F5 u, b- @% q' G9 q8 t* M# w# M$ k
“This is something I’ve been saying for a long time, that the only way to get projects built in this country is to do them responsibly.”6 f2 \$ h, r5 M" n' D, a1 _/ ]3 Y
2 P$ p; q1 g2 c- f; x+ `Premier Rachel Notley, distancing herself from her favourite ally, demands a legislative cannonade, a federal bill to reassert the former approval. She decries the “regulatory merry-go-round that isn’t going to help anybody.”
0 d% x- ^" C- c1 i0 K% i) K! B+ S9 s
* E6 C$ B0 W! u8 F1 D7 Q0 G
3 Y+ I% Q, M5 J% q; z" y! T) WThe job now is to get the project back to where it was last Wednesday, before the court ruling came down.
9 z2 O( `0 O0 D
# D7 g [# I. K% e+ o; o: dIt had been signed and sealed. This was an officially approved interprovincial pipeline, ramping up to full construction.0 B2 B' s8 p8 e' _
# Z& D9 d. g1 j
Now it’s nothing. The approval process even overturned a federal cabinet order. The workers will be going home, the contractors packing up.
; A v- n; q8 p8 G- C, i9 e4 o1 U& W, e# b2 Y; }
Getting back to “YES” (that is, last Wednesday) will take time and money. And nobody knows what further legal horrors might await, even after another approval.
, L# ]3 U) w) D8 U0 f0 q' I" j& g# y$ W/ @* x9 `
But Trudeau paints it as a simple matter of improving consultation and looking into maritime transportation.
, P) i9 ]% r& A& c) M' P2 K8 W* }) d g, ^
Trudeau also says that if Ottawa hadn’t bought the project, it would be dead today.
2 _" _3 Y! c$ ^' M& k& N
. ^+ [, }7 v* j2 X3 b3 WActually, if Ottawa hadn’t purchased it for $4.5 billion in May, the assets would now be a much better buy.9 h2 D/ N: n8 ]: U. ^ i5 B M5 N, E
7 b' n$ E& I7 r1 q' L“Why didn’t the federal government wait until after the ruling?” retired oil and gas analyst Gordon Tait asks in an email.
% ^5 @% t. K/ k' p5 s, S9 |0 ~4 w8 ?0 n" d% D8 ~8 X. l( k
“They could have acquired the pipeline for a lower price than they paid a few months ago. There was no downside in waiting.* t' J7 z( j* K& G' K( w8 n! o
. c' k3 |+ Z" V d/ }“If the expansion had been approved, Kinder Morgan shareholders would have paid for the expansion — not Canadian taxpayers.”
1 ~3 u, B U& `2 i7 h
# N& w! n7 F9 i |
|
楼主: 驻足闻香
狗仔卡
发表于 2018-9-6 23:08
显身卡
小黄还有功夫吵架。
明白人 
