 鲜花( 1181)  鸡蛋( 48)
|
E6 q- G+ [- X% R& {
* N k; y2 o& Q( D1 D" \0 B+ I$ J诺特利2018年9月5号在和小土豆面谈中要求小土豆立法。白纸黑字有图片。
; w3 {) E v% h5 W, F5 Y$ M阅读英文新闻对你来说很困难吗?请看文章红字部分。
9 Q) E9 Z) R( r
9 m9 W0 C1 v8 rhttps://calgaryherald.com/news/p ... f-pipeline-collapse# M8 n& X1 S+ T2 x
5 J- U3 v* M: F( C9 s* u4 ?; uBraid: Trudeau sees the sunny side of pipeline collapse
) W9 c0 w$ Q0 {3 N/ Y, P. F: Y! ~9 y& ~
Oh, so that’s it. The pipeline rejection is just a bump in the road. In fact, you could even see it as proof of just how robust the Liberal approval process is.# a( ?( T: O8 l; t
. J: G' x! S% g: j' `! D9 P2 Y' lThat’s what a person might think, listening to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau on Wednesday, as he actually tried to turn this mess into an affirmation of his ideals.
9 \3 R* w7 x) M F# i' k! X1 X+ T' c' l
He said he’s “disappointed” with the ruling, mind you. He knows it “really hurt” Alberta. Ottawa will do better and meet the Federal Court of Appeal’s concerns.9 W+ P5 {: I; v5 ^' p* @/ [
9 z1 g. _: g1 ~( zAt one point, he slammed the Harper government’s approach and said “the court has just confirmed that was never going to work.”
+ q- N; a0 A" A
% q' }8 J% {' K+ }7 J$ CActually, the court ruled on a Trudeau government approach that was never going to work.# g' [- g2 e z6 g' b* \
2 c) P6 H5 a3 H
But the court also agrees with Trudeau on the need for rigour, it seems.
) x' J# y+ J1 K6 f! y/ {7 e! n i' o0 O2 M7 n9 K* N
“This is something I’ve been saying for a long time, that the only way to get projects built in this country is to do them responsibly.”
* d; k! I3 F' K$ X. O
: s6 x& Z" ~! l n: [# _8 OPremier Rachel Notley, distancing herself from her favourite ally, demands a legislative cannonade, a federal bill to reassert the former approval. She decries the “regulatory merry-go-round that isn’t going to help anybody.”
% R: }/ r+ m# m2 o
! ^3 ^* S/ {: d# u1 i* [ - p% p4 d& K9 _
+ @% Q6 R9 E2 z& h
The job now is to get the project back to where it was last Wednesday, before the court ruling came down.
# L$ l. x+ X1 D4 J: q7 E7 @. U3 h
It had been signed and sealed. This was an officially approved interprovincial pipeline, ramping up to full construction.; r+ W: M7 c! j
9 u6 z0 e( F- y* ?- ~ TNow it’s nothing. The approval process even overturned a federal cabinet order. The workers will be going home, the contractors packing up.
& ^) n* m, N, A* d6 [5 r( \( m0 ~
9 J' \3 I/ e0 p! VGetting back to “YES” (that is, last Wednesday) will take time and money. And nobody knows what further legal horrors might await, even after another approval., Y' Z% l n! |$ C
7 s/ @. I- N9 j6 j' m. ~
But Trudeau paints it as a simple matter of improving consultation and looking into maritime transportation.0 J) R; k4 Z- S9 a7 [5 f
: t+ L: Z( ?: n. [4 ?Trudeau also says that if Ottawa hadn’t bought the project, it would be dead today.6 K* ~# _( w, s* N- |$ Z1 P
" N, m( V, A* Q' l
Actually, if Ottawa hadn’t purchased it for $4.5 billion in May, the assets would now be a much better buy.
- c# h$ A# Z1 J/ L( g
! O7 U f; e/ k8 J3 T“Why didn’t the federal government wait until after the ruling?” retired oil and gas analyst Gordon Tait asks in an email.$ c+ U$ N& [4 K6 {
; ^( `4 _3 r5 T( V7 R
“They could have acquired the pipeline for a lower price than they paid a few months ago. There was no downside in waiting.
' L& U5 \6 j' d0 D9 e8 R5 `1 d9 T( e* Q/ @9 B" ?6 d
“If the expansion had been approved, Kinder Morgan shareholders would have paid for the expansion — not Canadian taxpayers.”0 H: Q# k8 U9 P
3 I- [6 q4 b8 F$ Y$ K* y
|
|