 鲜花( 1181)  鸡蛋( 48)
|
8 J, f/ I! H+ m
- v2 T, x8 E0 L. t0 t# N' z' W0 c
诺特利2018年9月5号在和小土豆面谈中要求小土豆立法。白纸黑字有图片。3 U0 C4 M& d2 Q$ k H
阅读英文新闻对你来说很困难吗？请看文章红字部分。1 L5 R' R9 M% m( N( a6 t3 u
3 w4 Z% s6 j/ K9 ^( \1 C% h" c" x2 |
https://calgaryherald.com/news/p ... f-pipeline-collapse
L' }0 E ?6 h* d
6 P4 p0 Y9 k, A& |& q2 a* jBraid: Trudeau sees the sunny side of pipeline collapse
3 r. B, h- h2 t0 G+ k% h
. [) T R9 g* h* ^Oh, so that’s it. The pipeline rejection is just a bump in the road. In fact, you could even see it as proof of just how robust the Liberal approval process is.5 t7 D. Z1 F4 o
9 _1 @$ j; g1 R' x3 V" dThat’s what a person might think, listening to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau on Wednesday, as he actually tried to turn this mess into an affirmation of his ideals.& n/ t+ D5 H* n! L- D+ \7 z
( v* D) @' S2 m+ Y5 X1 S, l' ]5 s
He said he’s “disappointed” with the ruling, mind you. He knows it “really hurt” Alberta. Ottawa will do better and meet the Federal Court of Appeal’s concerns.0 U1 x/ `, b; l j2 t
8 g: j' v9 F3 J7 |6 R1 ~ n8 f
At one point, he slammed the Harper government’s approach and said “the court has just confirmed that was never going to work.”
+ f9 L/ k6 @5 C$ W6 ~. f3 i& L7 [) x8 S+ E5 Z J7 m7 `% H
Actually, the court ruled on a Trudeau government approach that was never going to work.
* A3 }3 d6 A( g6 V3 ^! p( |, J
! S5 l4 z4 Q& m3 x7 [But the court also agrees with Trudeau on the need for rigour, it seems.
4 E* F" y6 r8 e7 H6 M
% {: E# S1 @4 E0 L0 E“This is something I’ve been saying for a long time, that the only way to get projects built in this country is to do them responsibly.”
- n5 H5 D6 u7 M' O& K% {2 j% i
6 T9 F7 K- U0 j# P( VPremier Rachel Notley, distancing herself from her favourite ally, demands a legislative cannonade, a federal bill to reassert the former approval. She decries the “regulatory merry-go-round that isn’t going to help anybody.”
3 |2 `0 {8 [; v5 j# c0 `* P2 O- L9 p& H# D" X
0 }/ B2 d3 C& s! j$ X2 `; _3 W" h8 O! h5 o3 U- L0 Y: g$ p
The job now is to get the project back to where it was last Wednesday, before the court ruling came down.) z% a, c- q1 |* H, C
6 d8 r; ^: M* ~2 k" i7 R" P* H
It had been signed and sealed. This was an officially approved interprovincial pipeline, ramping up to full construction.) }! q/ ~9 E% T$ ?% ]
$ h9 A: \# n: \7 I! BNow it’s nothing. The approval process even overturned a federal cabinet order. The workers will be going home, the contractors packing up.
# U, k% H9 g2 T% F y5 ?0 R5 w- j6 ]% F
Getting back to “YES” (that is, last Wednesday) will take time and money. And nobody knows what further legal horrors might await, even after another approval.
6 v! j# j: p# m8 I8 i5 x0 z f6 y
But Trudeau paints it as a simple matter of improving consultation and looking into maritime transportation.1 f4 g1 s1 Z3 Q( H: ^6 o, O" w
( Z/ D; h5 `0 R3 F' m$ Z
Trudeau also says that if Ottawa hadn’t bought the project, it would be dead today.
Z/ b, u2 G, q4 }3 B2 @
0 P: y. ?9 f, i( h7 E+ J: C) ~Actually, if Ottawa hadn’t purchased it for $4.5 billion in May, the assets would now be a much better buy.& c$ s @( }$ Y# Q' ^7 K. }5 Q
: Y+ Y. _: h+ g) x; ]& E“Why didn’t the federal government wait until after the ruling?” retired oil and gas analyst Gordon Tait asks in an email.8 @# p3 j, I' |7 [ G* v* s
8 E3 A1 q! X w+ |% ]) J
“They could have acquired the pipeline for a lower price than they paid a few months ago. There was no downside in waiting.; |4 M* T& K9 Z/ D1 F6 w
% o' Q4 a8 X3 t4 @. _
“If the expansion had been approved, Kinder Morgan shareholders would have paid for the expansion — not Canadian taxpayers.”! ^& R& D. z- E; S8 ]
; g. J+ A- C1 [ |
|
楼主: 驻足闻香
狗仔卡
发表于 2018-9-6 23:08
显身卡
小黄还有功夫吵架。
明白人 
