 鲜花( 1181)  鸡蛋( 48)
|
- m" ]* y+ Q5 }2 H
) Y4 n8 D' r" ]8 _- i" g诺特利2018年9月5号在和小土豆面谈中要求小土豆立法。白纸黑字有图片。! ?1 s1 i: H$ E2 G7 q& Q
阅读英文新闻对你来说很困难吗？请看文章红字部分。4 |% G, b& a# N
# N1 }6 F) @3 Whttps://calgaryherald.com/news/p ... f-pipeline-collapse, C2 _5 O" P. ~1 S& k
8 q) r/ v, t/ x x2 a2 W
Braid: Trudeau sees the sunny side of pipeline collapse: L. M. _9 e% R
8 n1 Z, V4 e( XOh, so that’s it. The pipeline rejection is just a bump in the road. In fact, you could even see it as proof of just how robust the Liberal approval process is.9 j: q! u0 \2 [+ e
, H0 O& s3 k0 w6 f6 |1 m* m! J, k
That’s what a person might think, listening to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau on Wednesday, as he actually tried to turn this mess into an affirmation of his ideals.6 s* ~3 y: L1 Z
& H) }2 `) S2 v6 R
He said he’s “disappointed” with the ruling, mind you. He knows it “really hurt” Alberta. Ottawa will do better and meet the Federal Court of Appeal’s concerns.' s: V9 r' [* a" j: V3 J$ x! I
$ \) H4 w" g# k: j8 O1 r' yAt one point, he slammed the Harper government’s approach and said “the court has just confirmed that was never going to work.”
4 G. q4 ~' [! U5 k) T: }: D) {; Z: P! U' K4 x8 ^
Actually, the court ruled on a Trudeau government approach that was never going to work.
1 X: h( m- g4 _# J/ F
2 ~ P0 Y% D# k; b/ L0 rBut the court also agrees with Trudeau on the need for rigour, it seems.% A b0 c/ ?/ P% M( F- ^4 a$ ?
- h9 I5 o/ Z1 K9 o
“This is something I’ve been saying for a long time, that the only way to get projects built in this country is to do them responsibly.”
4 n* s$ z9 o8 }: g# W( Z8 e( `/ J+ y2 K; Q
Premier Rachel Notley, distancing herself from her favourite ally, demands a legislative cannonade, a federal bill to reassert the former approval. She decries the “regulatory merry-go-round that isn’t going to help anybody.”
- n1 x1 @. b: ?- @, t6 v3 k4 D7 n7 c6 l2 n: h/ Q2 K5 W$ i
 . x' y/ w1 J: Y# Y2 Y% O8 S
8 g9 {# b/ V8 P, v6 e, b
The job now is to get the project back to where it was last Wednesday, before the court ruling came down.
. u# l" H8 R0 Y: x: \& C' o3 z1 @6 T5 P/ i# t: z
It had been signed and sealed. This was an officially approved interprovincial pipeline, ramping up to full construction.
' T3 K7 s* b- r* ^" U
0 {8 F! s1 u& v r X; v) S' uNow it’s nothing. The approval process even overturned a federal cabinet order. The workers will be going home, the contractors packing up.
. x C- p- Z% s& v( Z$ _( C4 E5 p# |/ c
! `1 |- v6 R8 f7 | j+ m9 z2 h- @6 jGetting back to “YES” (that is, last Wednesday) will take time and money. And nobody knows what further legal horrors might await, even after another approval.
/ q& z9 z( d2 W
+ S# U1 _9 q+ ?. H; |. D2 S& hBut Trudeau paints it as a simple matter of improving consultation and looking into maritime transportation.
& @1 R2 s; N; q+ j. p# O, H
5 ]/ k' h$ G' S" Z$ [Trudeau also says that if Ottawa hadn’t bought the project, it would be dead today.
/ ~1 y; g8 u) u5 ~: k* T0 e# T/ ^) J4 U
Actually, if Ottawa hadn’t purchased it for $4.5 billion in May, the assets would now be a much better buy.
9 W" H5 y: f4 o J- I. C; p' k) F5 V/ k8 n% y" L# C8 T! ]
“Why didn’t the federal government wait until after the ruling?” retired oil and gas analyst Gordon Tait asks in an email.$ F6 R$ C. J3 `
4 V9 U- w1 R3 o4 M+ Y( e
“They could have acquired the pipeline for a lower price than they paid a few months ago. There was no downside in waiting.
) m5 ~2 h0 s* e0 y; X9 C+ ~, m0 [( q* x: s+ Q, ?3 w$ k
“If the expansion had been approved, Kinder Morgan shareholders would have paid for the expansion — not Canadian taxpayers.”
# E9 |5 j9 }8 j/ h2 W& O: `1 V: u* `/ b# A P4 x% F2 K9 H% T5 u
|
|
楼主: 驻足闻香
狗仔卡
发表于 2018-9-6 23:08
显身卡
小黄还有功夫吵架。
明白人 . j9 A/ @- D; j8 x- ~5 O% d
