I would like to see more Debate, not Fight. Debate for fun, fight to get a headache % t( q/ m: a) U& i* F6 a9 d $ W ?+ ?# n2 J8 l5 f7 CCalm down everyone please.. v1 c$ j8 j8 q) J2 H3 r' N3 K
( n) i* c1 Z& d/ h: g" p不存在 can mean two different things:# @8 c2 |6 L2 K! B* |
, ^' C+ o' g# L4 d1: 不存在 (not yet). Such as a house before construction etc. ( P& u! j/ i6 a4 M$ G) v2 |2: 不存在 (never exist) such as 上帝都不能举起的石头 9 A5 y( e% F: b0 P( N, Z" z 1 N: Q# O$ i+ E! o0 ?. h C) nI assumed that dora's 不存在 meant never exist! X* p; ], O0 T( m
; e8 |8 y( u' N' w: W- T
[ 本帖最后由 eastroster 于 2006-6-8 03:29 编辑 ]
原帖由 eastroster 于 2006-6-8 03:13 发表 , O j3 m/ Z% D& Q& aI would like to see more Debate, not Fight. Debate for fun, fight to get a headache9 s" F- Y* w; T% L% W6 d
2 v6 H9 f, e5 y' P; ~Calm down everyone please.1 v7 u* o. c/ i8 h9 A; W, Y$ x
" p4 s1 n3 X9 k4 n
不存在 can mean two different things:- U* t1 @) I; W' e# v1 t9 i# k9 \
' a, G0 A# s& h1: 不存在 (not yet). Such as a house before construction etc.& b4 W: C3 B- Y" Q$ V0 d! U8 E2 R
2: 不存在 (never exist) such as 上帝都不能举起的石头 + P3 E) ?# ^# D: R/ S P6 ]) G( U5 V6 i$ C% W8 K9 L/ { L9 z
I assumed that dora's 不存在 meant never exist ...
, |' ^) @$ z) r5 L5 R. I 7 H) r1 U- J n, I小铜子,, 你的1和2根本不是对立关系.. 1并不能否定2. 1只能refer to current state, 2 refer to past state,过去没有,, 现在没有,, 将来就一定没有吗/?/? 上帝的无所不能不应该体现在能创造将来吗/? 她根本不能自圆其说.
6 F5 c, W$ B% Z7 ^有一点我倒开始了思考,是否信教的人都不太会吵架?这楼主吵不过别人,骂不出脏话,招架不住了就只得向版主请求删除太脏的贴子,这一点实属可爱啊.$ U) B+ y, f1 \, a; z9 l D
3 Z$ o8 ~/ u! B
我本人尊重宗教信仰,都什么年代了,还有有一种追求一种信仰,难能可贵啊.
6 Y: n5 ~# q/ V# E 2 refer to past state,过去没有,, 现在没有,, 将来就一定没有吗/?/? 上帝的无所不能不应该体现在能创造将来吗/? 她根本不 ...
0 Y) Z, c: A9 P# J( p9 j' S
6 r' K# d& X& y# B
2:" never exist" refers to 过去没有,, 现在没有,, 将来一定没有!!! 9 ~4 G! D+ x) [9 T. @ J" H! I$ m7 i8 l, t2 _$ ?
At least dora meant that I am pretty sure." t6 C f* D( G' p
/ C. g- e' t. Y' l
[ 本帖最后由 eastroster 于 2006-6-8 10:57 编辑 ]
; k5 D6 f: B; r0 n* S' C: i: s w+ j8 a) I# d6 Y. H- R# I$ m
2:" never exist" refers to 过去没有,, 现在没有,, 将来一定没有!!! 4 H, P- U5 C3 R' L( u1 {! A2 e6 Y$ ^2 ^/ {. p
At least dora meant that I am pretty sure.
) v0 O& O2 J8 {9 \0 ^! N 8 a$ U( P y) }1 \. Q; N0 ~; R) z8 O' jArguments on religious believes always turn out to become very emotional (if not violent). It has been like that for hundreds of years (if not thousands of years) 7 z, `7 n5 |! a- x0 q) ~, D/ {8 O9 M8 N* G7 ^6 ]/ d8 ^0 I, O
Maybe we should stop argument. + @1 E E3 y. L7 x! U
- d& ~ N( [: d4 |7 `7 eMy commoent " Dora's 逻辑 is correct " was with the view point of logistics instead of religion 4 R9 t! T" T) {* p& u' ~- v! M* Y: k
[ 本帖最后由 eastroster 于 2006-6-8 11:28 编辑 ]