 鲜花( 3)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
本帖最后由 leohu 于 2011-11-3 14:39 编辑
}) ?9 H9 P" r还是没明白你是怎么从“时事政治某个版主不想发表过多的政治言论”推出“这个版主支持时事政治需要一位积极发表政治言论的版主”这个结论的?% r) n/ |# z6 s+ L$ H1 X
) \$ r; l* P, T: {
这明摆着是两码事
! j% _4 D2 t5 B: t) M$ C3 V! x& ysweetlele 发表于 2011-11-3 14:03 
9 [' Y& E/ i) }/ E* A q
5 t$ J( `: s, G+ Q$ qcan't type chinese at work,
. w- H% o+ m2 [8 H& ?) ?
2 a# P0 m0 ^# C' V; G$ v"没傻到要在网上正经谈政治观点的地步" and "不想发表过多的政治言论" are 两码事 to me.) \ _% K+ a( m9 O" F9 n9 v2 E" l
9 ?8 l# s. k, y' n$ V' ~0 L) ]9 s
What's obvious to me may not be obvious to you. If I said "1+1=2, its obvious." And you want to act like you are smarter and argue "prove it, it is not obvious to me". Then I don't think we should talk more from there. It's just a waste of time. |
|