 鲜花( 3)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
本帖最后由 leohu 于 2011-11-3 14:39 编辑 , j0 k' i" I+ }% L; W
还是没明白你是怎么从“时事政治某个版主不想发表过多的政治言论”推出“这个版主支持时事政治需要一位积极发表政治言论的版主”这个结论的?: F' [0 @! d- g8 r* }+ L. s& \
( t/ a& b- r. g% l& ?" G ^
这明摆着是两码事
4 C# T% T- x. u" u5 F+ g$ l+ L5 d6 ]sweetlele 发表于 2011-11-3 14:03  1 b( H; @1 @5 ~" d
, L" q2 n2 Y5 Q+ A0 Z' c. Xcan't type chinese at work,$ s. Y, G/ o8 ~' I" M) C( \ f& M, H; U: q
6 v: [8 Z2 x, X3 }$ g: s
"没傻到要在网上正经谈政治观点的地步" and "不想发表过多的政治言论" are 两码事 to me.4 W2 Z, D0 [# u0 r1 j! t
" v& r) _" J) ?+ C z" W3 hWhat's obvious to me may not be obvious to you. If I said "1+1=2, its obvious." And you want to act like you are smarter and argue "prove it, it is not obvious to me". Then I don't think we should talk more from there. It's just a waste of time. |
|