 鲜花( 3)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
本帖最后由 leohu 于 2011-11-3 14:39 编辑
7 e. x' Q9 G* L还是没明白你是怎么从“时事政治某个版主不想发表过多的政治言论”推出“这个版主支持时事政治需要一位积极发表政治言论的版主”这个结论的?
( m v( s8 ~" v! H, h0 a( r1 T2 a/ e5 [- a+ F! d$ X1 A
这明摆着是两码事
9 {4 r: T S# E& Zsweetlele 发表于 2011-11-3 14:03 
' c e H$ v( p% c( R. E8 k! v* ]* M j+ z: \
can't type chinese at work,- h+ g. J; \, a2 t, U4 F8 o: O
5 z- j W9 O8 J6 H8 p"没傻到要在网上正经谈政治观点的地步" and "不想发表过多的政治言论" are 两码事 to me.. @( Z/ I* a& q. E) b& e- `( ?, Z
% L8 {5 t7 s8 v
What's obvious to me may not be obvious to you. If I said "1+1=2, its obvious." And you want to act like you are smarter and argue "prove it, it is not obvious to me". Then I don't think we should talk more from there. It's just a waste of time. |
|