 鲜花( 3)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
本帖最后由 leohu 于 2011-11-3 14:39 编辑
; t( z" y- {( |0 A, U9 \) m$ b还是没明白你是怎么从“时事政治某个版主不想发表过多的政治言论”推出“这个版主支持时事政治需要一位积极发表政治言论的版主”这个结论的?' V; L; a; q1 O& j) t6 R9 |
0 D/ M" p u( } r# X1 S# l: w$ |
这明摆着是两码事
+ {: r* O/ M/ V. r6 ?, F( Csweetlele 发表于 2011-11-3 14:03  * O$ L1 Z2 E0 g/ T
) z" N2 w) @5 e1 C6 N* ^can't type chinese at work,9 o7 m( Q& m9 E6 Q2 ^8 P
+ p$ K' Q& } V7 j1 U. {"没傻到要在网上正经谈政治观点的地步" and "不想发表过多的政治言论" are 两码事 to me.
, D: U: z& ^( e, W7 l& K. n: E$ j' U5 Z$ m
What's obvious to me may not be obvious to you. If I said "1+1=2, its obvious." And you want to act like you are smarter and argue "prove it, it is not obvious to me". Then I don't think we should talk more from there. It's just a waste of time. |
|