 鲜花( 3)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
本帖最后由 leohu 于 2011-11-3 14:39 编辑
5 t. e$ o8 R) W还是没明白你是怎么从“时事政治某个版主不想发表过多的政治言论”推出“这个版主支持时事政治需要一位积极发表政治言论的版主”这个结论的?( H* Z" G( N. D+ y4 o
# L8 K2 }1 |& G* G, E这明摆着是两码事
+ b+ s0 U1 J7 ~sweetlele 发表于 2011-11-3 14:03  1 H) S* X, t$ D
; P2 G! ?1 i' A8 j% x' s$ j- p
can't type chinese at work,& ?% P+ v, |% R) T# O
5 |: F, u- c0 g
"没傻到要在网上正经谈政治观点的地步" and "不想发表过多的政治言论" are 两码事 to me.
: [2 A" V; v% ~* o o3 T$ E5 B' G" d* T1 f4 H
What's obvious to me may not be obvious to you. If I said "1+1=2, its obvious." And you want to act like you are smarter and argue "prove it, it is not obvious to me". Then I don't think we should talk more from there. It's just a waste of time. |
|