 鲜花( 3)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
本帖最后由 leohu 于 2011-11-3 14:39 编辑 , R+ e/ K2 Y- q+ J- F( |
还是没明白你是怎么从“时事政治某个版主不想发表过多的政治言论”推出“这个版主支持时事政治需要一位积极发表政治言论的版主”这个结论的?
, q% f# b' {: e) t* e$ A8 S% V; _3 z" _
这明摆着是两码事9 P) K. }2 l& w; ^% l
sweetlele 发表于 2011-11-3 14:03 
, Q" i0 f }& x& O, F. c( p; B" Q [% P0 w2 X( A
can't type chinese at work,
' t" v* Z8 \/ F! G; j# F6 f) |+ G( W6 E) b' {3 }; V* }0 P, d
"没傻到要在网上正经谈政治观点的地步" and "不想发表过多的政治言论" are 两码事 to me.
$ B3 c8 R% J* t! [# n9 ?
9 l, O, O; ]7 o7 B7 j) ?% qWhat's obvious to me may not be obvious to you. If I said "1+1=2, its obvious." And you want to act like you are smarter and argue "prove it, it is not obvious to me". Then I don't think we should talk more from there. It's just a waste of time. |
|