 鲜花( 3)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
本帖最后由 leohu 于 2011-11-3 14:39 编辑 " b: L! a4 X1 m$ o, ~8 `
还是没明白你是怎么从“时事政治某个版主不想发表过多的政治言论”推出“这个版主支持时事政治需要一位积极发表政治言论的版主”这个结论的?
`: Z& G" K& h! M4 u/ W7 g' u- X% v0 k3 q
这明摆着是两码事0 v+ I U( j; l: V! J
sweetlele 发表于 2011-11-3 14:03  7 N& {9 F# e2 `+ l" _* n
/ V6 V; U. ~5 \/ _
can't type chinese at work,
+ K; v# N J( O% I) T& z6 g4 y
9 M& q( S: ^% \7 B D7 X, ~"没傻到要在网上正经谈政治观点的地步" and "不想发表过多的政治言论" are 两码事 to me.
) P2 x' j6 u9 U+ N' q" ^" J* z% Y6 A
What's obvious to me may not be obvious to you. If I said "1+1=2, its obvious." And you want to act like you are smarter and argue "prove it, it is not obvious to me". Then I don't think we should talk more from there. It's just a waste of time. |
|