29# rocia 3 i. I, O( x/ n' l6 t$ w5 m 9 G: S' M: |/ W5 w. i, q, F- w* T+ L9 [$ Z4 |
BONUS ROOM建在车库上,我们一般都喜欢院子朝南的房子,所以那里常年不见阳光,冬天很冷。) w* J& x$ R: v# Y, W$ W9 C0 A2 m
那如果买一个院子朝北的,你的主卧和楼下客厅又常年不见阳光。而且BONUS 没有门,很难想象可以做卧室。 7 f0 B1 c0 o6 U ..." C. M! J% j, s* ?
紫光 发表于 2009-11-14 10:31
1 O9 [, f1 |5 e% ]2 M& a' @
院子,厨房和FAMILY ROOM 都朝南,冬天真的很舒服的,阳光充足,我觉得在厨房的时间也较多,不喜欢FAMILY ROOM在车库上,阴冷,这里的冬天太长,更不能吧卧室建在车库上(如果车库朝北),车库没有取暖,保温又不行,这卧室的温度比其他的房间得低好几度
Everyone has his own personal needs and preference so whatever type or design one would go don't really matter, I think LZ is trying to say, which is the main idea of this topic, 2 same sq ft houses may have a completely different design approach and the costs to build is like day/night and buyers better keep their heads up and not being tricked by the builders. So if a house with 800 sq ft on the main floor and 1200 sq ft above was priced the same as another one with 1200 sq ft on the main floor/ 800 on the upper floor is surely OVERPRICED. Don't be fooled and save yourself some money. Be a smart consumer.
48#小黄/ y& l" l& n' B r l
) c3 y1 D$ _( l- h+ e
我整个帖子的POINT是,不要单单被面积欺骗了。同样的面积价格可能差很多,上面的例子只是个简单注解。 : g/ i7 V; K) k9 Z4 o8 f# M- E今年我看到的很多2000尺的新房很多不过是2年前1700-1800尺的地基,一个非常简单的猫腻。特别是我有幸进了一个正在施工的2000尺的房子,看到了施工图纸,这张图纸还是这个房子的第二代,上面明确标注了面积1700多,建筑商的花招在:1、加大BONUS ROOM;2、将餐厅往外推了2尺但是基础看起来没有变;3、壁炉位置放在中间并向外推了一点,这里居然也多出了10几个SQFT。总之还是原来1700的房子,拼凑成了2000尺,然后当然也是按2000尺的价格卖,但是一进去就能感觉不是那么回事。- \7 ]+ O/ Y9 M, S% v
另外,在26的地上建个2000尺,办法只能是牺牲后院将房子拉长。 * a1 o' i4 f% _. K5 W* c ( P8 A4 r. S) L' z; {# M) {你抬杠连要抬的是什么都没有弄清楚。