Is there a house bubble in Edmonton?

smalltown

How to figure a home's fundamental value
Leamer says he can tell because homes, just like stocks, have a price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) that he believes determines their fundamental value. The “earnings” part of the ratio consists of the annual rent the house could command. Homebuyers can compare current P/Es with historical levels, Leamer says, to get some idea of whether houses in their cities are becoming overvalued.

7 }6 e6 K8 F& j* x& I# aNot everyone buys the idea that P/Es dictate value. But investors who completely ignore P/Es do so at their peril, as many have learned in recent years. Leamer, who heads the prestigious Anderson Forecast at the University of California in Los Angeles, points out that the P/E for the Standard & Poor’s 500, a key stock benchmark, was nearly double its previous historical high when the stock market bubble burst in 2000. When home P/Es peaked in California, Boston, Dallas and other markets in the mid-1980s, devastating real estate recessions followed.
  h; t* ~9 y$ U9 [! j& X& n
Leamer didn’t invent the concept of P/Es for homes. But his willingness to proclaim bubbles in several of the nation’s hottest markets has brought him lots of attention recently.

To calculate P/Es for entire cities, Leamer divided the median home price in each by the annual rent for a two-bedroom unit in each city -- and looked at P/Es each year since 1988. Here’s what he found:
8 m( Z% y2 I! S$ J3 I" M

; Z, N; K' S. j7 sIn Boston, the residential real estate market’s P/E recently topped 30 -- compared with just under 20 in 1988.
0 A2 U1 ~4 q' t3 g* H
- W# _' m# v4 x* J# s" CSan Francisco’s previous peak of 25.6 in 1989 has been eclipsed, with the P/E currently at just over 27.
San Diego’s current P/E is nearly 30, compared with a 1989 high of 23.4.
New York, by contrast, is actually well below previous peaks. The area’s current 22.5 P/E is above its recent nadir of 17.6 in 1993, but down from 28.6 in 1988.
0 w' ~5 i2 P9 t- C, O1 b( o8 VYou don’t have to know exact P/Es, however, to spot signs of trouble, Leamer says. Any time there’s a disconnect between prices and the underlying value of homes, as measured by their market rents, there’s the potential for a bubble.
. E: x% F& ^6 r- \8 j! b
If home prices are rising much faster than rents, as is true in Los Angeles, that’s a strong indication a bubble is forming.
2 B! e; i9 T' `. }
& L; _. C5 n# G6 A  ]2 E% }If home prices are rising while average rents are falling -- which is the situation in San Francisco -- the bubble is pretty much unmistakable.

Home P/E ratios for 9 metro areas
+ W$ v# f! @* K0 r) P" a* _$ d Avg. 1988-2000 2001
Boston  20.5 30.2
  m, w% R+ G& o# N- M/ F7 WSan Diego  22.8 29.7
San Francisco  23.8 27.2
* x7 `; M1 X4 lLos Angeles  21.3 25.6
Seattle  20.4 25
1 l& c# {# l* M) h" ~; M$ D# LDenver  17.7 23.7
/ J. g* t' s# N) L/ eNew York  21.2 22.5
7 F, g4 ]& Z: Z; P  BChicago  17.2 20.8
' G" L9 ~) g! \! a( IWashington, D.C.  17.1 20.4
/ H. o7 `: ?1 P0 _% |
. W' I5 k; U4 C

6 X6 F3 V8 X; B3 F, rIt's difficult to compare P/Es from one city with those from another. P/Es in Atlantic City, N.J., have wavered between 17.3 and 11.6 since 1988; in San Diego, P/Es have not dropped below 20. But you can look on the P/E as a measure of risk -- that is, the higher the P/E is above its average level, the greater the risk, no matter where you live.
0 X, g* |: [; V# X7 \- C* }

# |. y# v) @1 X, T! a5 aFrom: http://moneycentral.msn.com/cont ... ingguide/P37631.asp

CANDYMAN

Who has the P/E for Edmonton for the last 20 years, please post it here.
& Z# ~* A9 F8 _& K! n( q
it would be a good reference.

2 u5 n% z: u8 n3 n- c1 ^  D6 D+ hthanks

醉酒当歌

20% buble at least. And it can take 3-5 years to digest the bubble if not burst.

+ q* [# X+ n2 c+ w[ 本帖最后由 醉酒当歌 于 2007-1-14 16:41 编辑 ]