Is there a house bubble in Edmonton?

smalltown

How to figure a home's fundamental value
( Y% h) r  C+ |' M6 WLeamer says he can tell because homes, just like stocks, have a price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) that he believes determines their fundamental value. The “earnings” part of the ratio consists of the annual rent the house could command. Homebuyers can compare current P/Es with historical levels, Leamer says, to get some idea of whether houses in their cities are becoming overvalued.
# N4 t7 U; P' n( k7 o
Not everyone buys the idea that P/Es dictate value. But investors who completely ignore P/Es do so at their peril, as many have learned in recent years. Leamer, who heads the prestigious Anderson Forecast at the University of California in Los Angeles, points out that the P/E for the Standard & Poor’s 500, a key stock benchmark, was nearly double its previous historical high when the stock market bubble burst in 2000. When home P/Es peaked in California, Boston, Dallas and other markets in the mid-1980s, devastating real estate recessions followed.
- ^4 x+ `  P0 U0 B, m5 T5 o
Leamer didn’t invent the concept of P/Es for homes. But his willingness to proclaim bubbles in several of the nation’s hottest markets has brought him lots of attention recently.
. d4 B4 O6 O1 h+ E- d
To calculate P/Es for entire cities, Leamer divided the median home price in each by the annual rent for a two-bedroom unit in each city -- and looked at P/Es each year since 1988. Here’s what he found:


In Boston, the residential real estate market’s P/E recently topped 30 -- compared with just under 20 in 1988.
% p: V3 ]8 G# H( Z$ y; [+ h( p+ o
San Francisco’s previous peak of 25.6 in 1989 has been eclipsed, with the P/E currently at just over 27.
3 `  `. D3 D5 L9 t) w$ t0 @, PSan Diego’s current P/E is nearly 30, compared with a 1989 high of 23.4.
New York, by contrast, is actually well below previous peaks. The area’s current 22.5 P/E is above its recent nadir of 17.6 in 1993, but down from 28.6 in 1988.
You don’t have to know exact P/Es, however, to spot signs of trouble, Leamer says. Any time there’s a disconnect between prices and the underlying value of homes, as measured by their market rents, there’s the potential for a bubble.
- h) ~4 M- {- S
$ u+ ], L( n2 a) rIf home prices are rising much faster than rents, as is true in Los Angeles, that’s a strong indication a bubble is forming.
3 Q& x4 U4 T7 a* v$ b" B7 Z0 x* ^4 L
If home prices are rising while average rents are falling -- which is the situation in San Francisco -- the bubble is pretty much unmistakable.
. a0 ?4 p7 p' y; a
$ \& P# L0 E/ q Home P/E ratios for 9 metro areas
/ y9 A9 f- r8 ]  V+ f Avg. 1988-2000 2001
Boston  20.5 30.2
0 i3 k6 d2 A7 oSan Diego  22.8 29.7
. O+ i+ ?. W: h$ V7 @, E$ ^San Francisco  23.8 27.2
Los Angeles  21.3 25.6
Seattle  20.4 25
) u. w2 O/ k1 |; U# {" wDenver  17.7 23.7
  y2 u$ A! K% c* V* C" hNew York  21.2 22.5
7 Q, v) r- ?" v4 S$ ^Chicago  17.2 20.8
Washington, D.C.  17.1 20.4

$ ^# I# B& n/ J& }6 l/ L

It's difficult to compare P/Es from one city with those from another. P/Es in Atlantic City, N.J., have wavered between 17.3 and 11.6 since 1988; in San Diego, P/Es have not dropped below 20. But you can look on the P/E as a measure of risk -- that is, the higher the P/E is above its average level, the greater the risk, no matter where you live.
6 f2 U+ g! f+ p. `0 z, U. E3 t
/ ]* V% b6 e% S" t; q
From: http://moneycentral.msn.com/cont ... ingguide/P37631.asp

CANDYMAN

Who has the P/E for Edmonton for the last 20 years, please post it here.
* ~, p+ I! a& M. Q  d
) r/ y, R: q+ h7 y- K: ait would be a good reference.

thanks

醉酒当歌

20% buble at least. And it can take 3-5 years to digest the bubble if not burst.

[ 本帖最后由 醉酒当歌 于 2007-1-14 16:41 编辑 ]