Is there a house bubble in Edmonton?

smalltown

How to figure a home's fundamental value
Leamer says he can tell because homes, just like stocks, have a price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) that he believes determines their fundamental value. The “earnings” part of the ratio consists of the annual rent the house could command. Homebuyers can compare current P/Es with historical levels, Leamer says, to get some idea of whether houses in their cities are becoming overvalued.
: E3 b5 p: l6 a& f) H* J
Not everyone buys the idea that P/Es dictate value. But investors who completely ignore P/Es do so at their peril, as many have learned in recent years. Leamer, who heads the prestigious Anderson Forecast at the University of California in Los Angeles, points out that the P/E for the Standard & Poor’s 500, a key stock benchmark, was nearly double its previous historical high when the stock market bubble burst in 2000. When home P/Es peaked in California, Boston, Dallas and other markets in the mid-1980s, devastating real estate recessions followed.

Leamer didn’t invent the concept of P/Es for homes. But his willingness to proclaim bubbles in several of the nation’s hottest markets has brought him lots of attention recently.
$ f7 q( E+ X" y# A4 {0 F( _7 O( g
  |( l$ l& r" P) D0 W; k' |To calculate P/Es for entire cities, Leamer divided the median home price in each by the annual rent for a two-bedroom unit in each city -- and looked at P/Es each year since 1988. Here’s what he found:
$ X5 v/ ]: c5 r" b4 a6 }
4 u4 ^, p% w" Y% l* k* J
0 w2 z, w, F; k, WIn Boston, the residential real estate market’s P/E recently topped 30 -- compared with just under 20 in 1988.
* y( G; O, J/ |! V, o! n
( v$ M! V8 ~: F/ _& a  u# J% jSan Francisco’s previous peak of 25.6 in 1989 has been eclipsed, with the P/E currently at just over 27.
San Diego’s current P/E is nearly 30, compared with a 1989 high of 23.4.
New York, by contrast, is actually well below previous peaks. The area’s current 22.5 P/E is above its recent nadir of 17.6 in 1993, but down from 28.6 in 1988.
You don’t have to know exact P/Es, however, to spot signs of trouble, Leamer says. Any time there’s a disconnect between prices and the underlying value of homes, as measured by their market rents, there’s the potential for a bubble.
2 i  |, _1 D/ T
4 A( a6 k" F2 ~% O$ GIf home prices are rising much faster than rents, as is true in Los Angeles, that’s a strong indication a bubble is forming.

If home prices are rising while average rents are falling -- which is the situation in San Francisco -- the bubble is pretty much unmistakable.
; g; o* t1 ~/ }+ \! f! X0 @
  f0 v4 J9 z: q; L5 L1 Z) q7 n Home P/E ratios for 9 metro areas
Avg. 1988-2000 2001
Boston  20.5 30.2
1 [9 F& o  p/ d- L/ l7 `San Diego  22.8 29.7
% h; h) e8 Q# c. i, a5 N* t# ISan Francisco  23.8 27.2
Los Angeles  21.3 25.6
5 q! w$ `7 Z% p4 N; VSeattle  20.4 25
/ ~( S) `5 `) Q  T$ ^1 |Denver  17.7 23.7
New York  21.2 22.5
Chicago  17.2 20.8
Washington, D.C.  17.1 20.4



1 s4 }/ W0 M# `3 @5 ~! ?It's difficult to compare P/Es from one city with those from another. P/Es in Atlantic City, N.J., have wavered between 17.3 and 11.6 since 1988; in San Diego, P/Es have not dropped below 20. But you can look on the P/E as a measure of risk -- that is, the higher the P/E is above its average level, the greater the risk, no matter where you live.
4 `% z( a7 \3 G2 G: D8 u

% S. @4 K" V% J; N+ U5 bFrom: http://moneycentral.msn.com/cont ... ingguide/P37631.asp

CANDYMAN

Who has the P/E for Edmonton for the last 20 years, please post it here.

it would be a good reference.
3 Y. O$ u3 D1 ^  h
# y6 a. A/ s; g& Jthanks

醉酒当歌

20% buble at least. And it can take 3-5 years to digest the bubble if not burst.
$ A1 D( z4 a2 h. h1 X' n: P. _
[ 本帖最后由 醉酒当歌 于 2007-1-14 16:41 编辑 ]