Is there a house bubble in Edmonton?

smalltown

How to figure a home's fundamental value
Leamer says he can tell because homes, just like stocks, have a price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) that he believes determines their fundamental value. The “earnings” part of the ratio consists of the annual rent the house could command. Homebuyers can compare current P/Es with historical levels, Leamer says, to get some idea of whether houses in their cities are becoming overvalued.

Not everyone buys the idea that P/Es dictate value. But investors who completely ignore P/Es do so at their peril, as many have learned in recent years. Leamer, who heads the prestigious Anderson Forecast at the University of California in Los Angeles, points out that the P/E for the Standard & Poor’s 500, a key stock benchmark, was nearly double its previous historical high when the stock market bubble burst in 2000. When home P/Es peaked in California, Boston, Dallas and other markets in the mid-1980s, devastating real estate recessions followed.
4 t1 Z, b' w( z' S# g2 d
Leamer didn’t invent the concept of P/Es for homes. But his willingness to proclaim bubbles in several of the nation’s hottest markets has brought him lots of attention recently.

+ G) \* S: t7 [. P* lTo calculate P/Es for entire cities, Leamer divided the median home price in each by the annual rent for a two-bedroom unit in each city -- and looked at P/Es each year since 1988. Here’s what he found:


% y, t; K9 E- L' F) jIn Boston, the residential real estate market’s P/E recently topped 30 -- compared with just under 20 in 1988.

" S9 K/ s4 t. W9 C2 B% BSan Francisco’s previous peak of 25.6 in 1989 has been eclipsed, with the P/E currently at just over 27.
San Diego’s current P/E is nearly 30, compared with a 1989 high of 23.4.
6 o1 b6 ]0 q4 L7 ^6 WNew York, by contrast, is actually well below previous peaks. The area’s current 22.5 P/E is above its recent nadir of 17.6 in 1993, but down from 28.6 in 1988.
2 A( c7 d# i$ ~) ^) s' WYou don’t have to know exact P/Es, however, to spot signs of trouble, Leamer says. Any time there’s a disconnect between prices and the underlying value of homes, as measured by their market rents, there’s the potential for a bubble.

8 `3 Z  z. j' T# F/ k) hIf home prices are rising much faster than rents, as is true in Los Angeles, that’s a strong indication a bubble is forming.
8 U" Q7 Z1 Y! {. ~* C" J4 ]
+ z! [$ K* h9 H4 |$ i/ y- f) rIf home prices are rising while average rents are falling -- which is the situation in San Francisco -- the bubble is pretty much unmistakable.

: L. q/ z. q! B# J Home P/E ratios for 9 metro areas
Avg. 1988-2000 2001
Boston  20.5 30.2
San Diego  22.8 29.7
San Francisco  23.8 27.2
2 z  |9 v0 \3 ]" X) l& `/ ^Los Angeles  21.3 25.6
Seattle  20.4 25
2 K; A* B0 u3 O$ {6 p% sDenver  17.7 23.7
New York  21.2 22.5
( T1 {0 [  k! \6 Q  N4 d+ \) RChicago  17.2 20.8
Washington, D.C.  17.1 20.4
" P( D: q' U' z
; E, }4 F! w, w, P6 s( l9 a: L
; W' f$ q2 a8 u1 ~/ W
+ ^# s) w0 L) W, c9 UIt's difficult to compare P/Es from one city with those from another. P/Es in Atlantic City, N.J., have wavered between 17.3 and 11.6 since 1988; in San Diego, P/Es have not dropped below 20. But you can look on the P/E as a measure of risk -- that is, the higher the P/E is above its average level, the greater the risk, no matter where you live.
2 c/ ^8 v3 H0 R# f

- j) A5 \0 |- \4 E4 B0 _' bFrom: http://moneycentral.msn.com/cont ... ingguide/P37631.asp

CANDYMAN

Who has the P/E for Edmonton for the last 20 years, please post it here.
+ i& V5 \9 y! u, W& X" [% F0 R1 I9 w
it would be a good reference.

# z5 [& ?$ V( Q: @9 ?thanks

醉酒当歌

20% buble at least. And it can take 3-5 years to digest the bubble if not burst.
0 U4 M9 S, T; _% A- x. }
/ R* j8 ^! U) [  E[ 本帖最后由 醉酒当歌 于 2007-1-14 16:41 编辑 ]