Is there a house bubble in Edmonton?

smalltown

How to figure a home's fundamental value
+ n9 P8 y* B3 Y. ?+ z: h* K, p2 @. _Leamer says he can tell because homes, just like stocks, have a price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) that he believes determines their fundamental value. The “earnings” part of the ratio consists of the annual rent the house could command. Homebuyers can compare current P/Es with historical levels, Leamer says, to get some idea of whether houses in their cities are becoming overvalued.
6 I. T5 D. A# d, w- s# J
Not everyone buys the idea that P/Es dictate value. But investors who completely ignore P/Es do so at their peril, as many have learned in recent years. Leamer, who heads the prestigious Anderson Forecast at the University of California in Los Angeles, points out that the P/E for the Standard & Poor’s 500, a key stock benchmark, was nearly double its previous historical high when the stock market bubble burst in 2000. When home P/Es peaked in California, Boston, Dallas and other markets in the mid-1980s, devastating real estate recessions followed.
' A% D( n" X# n3 L: F7 ?5 N6 v+ n
Leamer didn’t invent the concept of P/Es for homes. But his willingness to proclaim bubbles in several of the nation’s hottest markets has brought him lots of attention recently.

To calculate P/Es for entire cities, Leamer divided the median home price in each by the annual rent for a two-bedroom unit in each city -- and looked at P/Es each year since 1988. Here’s what he found:
9 F$ r8 l& l& E; Z  e

. H& f9 [. M* O3 fIn Boston, the residential real estate market’s P/E recently topped 30 -- compared with just under 20 in 1988.

7 c, o: f5 O* O) [& sSan Francisco’s previous peak of 25.6 in 1989 has been eclipsed, with the P/E currently at just over 27.
1 Z; g. @6 e) F% [0 dSan Diego’s current P/E is nearly 30, compared with a 1989 high of 23.4.
: G7 V/ N6 @$ ]  @! X: C  Y8 ?4 p  d7 SNew York, by contrast, is actually well below previous peaks. The area’s current 22.5 P/E is above its recent nadir of 17.6 in 1993, but down from 28.6 in 1988.
4 \6 V! V+ R8 ~You don’t have to know exact P/Es, however, to spot signs of trouble, Leamer says. Any time there’s a disconnect between prices and the underlying value of homes, as measured by their market rents, there’s the potential for a bubble.
: H0 W2 A1 w3 t; F, S
! v, r3 \! l( x4 y3 c# bIf home prices are rising much faster than rents, as is true in Los Angeles, that’s a strong indication a bubble is forming.
" B8 u* }8 [1 m! ^
& q- Q8 H" d: e' F9 qIf home prices are rising while average rents are falling -- which is the situation in San Francisco -- the bubble is pretty much unmistakable.
, M" ~' }+ l/ T- A4 Z
Home P/E ratios for 9 metro areas
# z0 |- i, r* W5 {) [3 j" q( i Avg. 1988-2000 2001
1 @, e3 [+ I; H4 D4 B8 g4 }) k0 MBoston  20.5 30.2
San Diego  22.8 29.7
San Francisco  23.8 27.2
  I. I+ ]. t% K6 R' jLos Angeles  21.3 25.6
Seattle  20.4 25
' }! V1 i, L$ y) FDenver  17.7 23.7
! j, X, t# j0 S. W2 g' b+ U: f" f( Y, tNew York  21.2 22.5
, E& W+ i/ W- P. c' h& NChicago  17.2 20.8
4 b! T5 ?- x# |Washington, D.C.  17.1 20.4



It's difficult to compare P/Es from one city with those from another. P/Es in Atlantic City, N.J., have wavered between 17.3 and 11.6 since 1988; in San Diego, P/Es have not dropped below 20. But you can look on the P/E as a measure of risk -- that is, the higher the P/E is above its average level, the greater the risk, no matter where you live.


From: http://moneycentral.msn.com/cont ... ingguide/P37631.asp

CANDYMAN

Who has the P/E for Edmonton for the last 20 years, please post it here.

+ Z! t& i5 X6 R3 Cit would be a good reference.

thanks

醉酒当歌

20% buble at least. And it can take 3-5 years to digest the bubble if not burst.

[ 本帖最后由 醉酒当歌 于 2007-1-14 16:41 编辑 ]