Is there a house bubble in Edmonton?

smalltown

How to figure a home's fundamental value
Leamer says he can tell because homes, just like stocks, have a price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) that he believes determines their fundamental value. The “earnings” part of the ratio consists of the annual rent the house could command. Homebuyers can compare current P/Es with historical levels, Leamer says, to get some idea of whether houses in their cities are becoming overvalued.
0 R7 p# N1 C6 o9 V  U+ c
& _2 ?5 n6 Z* M+ ?" G4 ~3 c0 vNot everyone buys the idea that P/Es dictate value. But investors who completely ignore P/Es do so at their peril, as many have learned in recent years. Leamer, who heads the prestigious Anderson Forecast at the University of California in Los Angeles, points out that the P/E for the Standard & Poor’s 500, a key stock benchmark, was nearly double its previous historical high when the stock market bubble burst in 2000. When home P/Es peaked in California, Boston, Dallas and other markets in the mid-1980s, devastating real estate recessions followed.
9 l+ j- X4 w2 U( H
Leamer didn’t invent the concept of P/Es for homes. But his willingness to proclaim bubbles in several of the nation’s hottest markets has brought him lots of attention recently.
8 R: D0 F" i/ `* Z
To calculate P/Es for entire cities, Leamer divided the median home price in each by the annual rent for a two-bedroom unit in each city -- and looked at P/Es each year since 1988. Here’s what he found:
9 d8 [% E" t0 A) d0 R5 x
" ~1 @$ ~$ H7 T! j
In Boston, the residential real estate market’s P/E recently topped 30 -- compared with just under 20 in 1988.
! v! f0 X: U4 \0 q1 U3 s
San Francisco’s previous peak of 25.6 in 1989 has been eclipsed, with the P/E currently at just over 27.
San Diego’s current P/E is nearly 30, compared with a 1989 high of 23.4.
; V( _. I4 d* W) GNew York, by contrast, is actually well below previous peaks. The area’s current 22.5 P/E is above its recent nadir of 17.6 in 1993, but down from 28.6 in 1988.
- c2 u( T/ r1 F  V) D( q8 GYou don’t have to know exact P/Es, however, to spot signs of trouble, Leamer says. Any time there’s a disconnect between prices and the underlying value of homes, as measured by their market rents, there’s the potential for a bubble.
2 Y9 y. V8 K# {7 N; b# ]
If home prices are rising much faster than rents, as is true in Los Angeles, that’s a strong indication a bubble is forming.

If home prices are rising while average rents are falling -- which is the situation in San Francisco -- the bubble is pretty much unmistakable.
5 _  L! P, S  L- r. N
Home P/E ratios for 9 metro areas
. e9 N4 y! P& t3 d, d Avg. 1988-2000 2001
1 `, k! m3 O& Q- G6 RBoston  20.5 30.2
, I* i# K' F# B! W0 fSan Diego  22.8 29.7
San Francisco  23.8 27.2
Los Angeles  21.3 25.6
Seattle  20.4 25
7 s; J- j0 m8 {, v" [5 MDenver  17.7 23.7
New York  21.2 22.5
7 K8 L/ \8 Z3 i3 i% M. d# E( ZChicago  17.2 20.8
6 Y, r3 n9 U, u0 AWashington, D.C.  17.1 20.4
5 q% L& W" b; d0 j% T

8 [6 `3 _) }0 P" q, I) A+ Q
9 A5 ^8 [! @! ?; p& E9 f' SIt's difficult to compare P/Es from one city with those from another. P/Es in Atlantic City, N.J., have wavered between 17.3 and 11.6 since 1988; in San Diego, P/Es have not dropped below 20. But you can look on the P/E as a measure of risk -- that is, the higher the P/E is above its average level, the greater the risk, no matter where you live.


From: http://moneycentral.msn.com/cont ... ingguide/P37631.asp

CANDYMAN

Who has the P/E for Edmonton for the last 20 years, please post it here.

) R, w3 X1 d( u# d' h6 c6 jit would be a good reference.

thanks

醉酒当歌

20% buble at least. And it can take 3-5 years to digest the bubble if not burst.

[ 本帖最后由 醉酒当歌 于 2007-1-14 16:41 编辑 ]