 鲜花( 1)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
本帖最后由 xchen 于 2015-12-4 17:02 编辑 ( y2 I: ?- P3 N* Q# j0 J' d
* A* }3 k, U y1 i% F9 L
, d \, s2 L; G+ }# NIf total is 4%, then, calculate the amount for traditional way for a house sold in 400,000, you'll find it will be 4% for total (100000*0.07 + 300000*0.03)/400000 = 0.04, so the same for both.
4 v) w+ h$ ^1 i: F9 ~& b2 U9 Y$ r7 p7 o: H6 t- J) B# N. R( Z
Let's try to calculate the rate for the traditional way: y = (0.07*100000 + (x-100000))/x => y=4000/x + 0.03
) o# K3 \+ x6 c- W( M4 f" G3 a9 F! i
comparing 2 realtors using above formular, you will see : 1) if total sale value (x in the formular) > 400,000, traditional realtor < 0.04, then traditional is better since it's < 0.04; 2) total sale value < 400,000, 2% realtor is better since traditional one > 0.04 3) if sale value is 400,000, both are the same..
& j! D& \' b- j
. ?9 D1 R8 z; sNote: above comparison is based on the assumption: 2% realtor means 2% for each side realtor (i.e., total 4%) 3 j& R* v R) Z2 s
|
|