 鲜花( 1)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
本帖最后由 xchen 于 2015-12-4 17:02 编辑 ' @& L5 v. J( `4 I# v9 f
% W. O. Z% u5 a0 Y; u7 d) I
; O3 o1 p7 {0 v, qIf total is 4%, then, calculate the amount for traditional way for a house sold in 400,000, you'll find it will be 4% for total (100000*0.07 + 300000*0.03)/400000 = 0.04, so the same for both. $ i% t+ S8 v' H2 G$ [
1 {- m) z9 I& {) g5 \6 d8 mLet's try to calculate the rate for the traditional way: y = (0.07*100000 + (x-100000))/x => y=4000/x + 0.03
, t# r) h1 ~# V7 k
5 h7 P& w9 p( o. o" p; ncomparing 2 realtors using above formular, you will see : 1) if total sale value (x in the formular) > 400,000, traditional realtor < 0.04, then traditional is better since it's < 0.04; 2) total sale value < 400,000, 2% realtor is better since traditional one > 0.04 3) if sale value is 400,000, both are the same..
5 y6 I, k7 x0 ~0 o( X' b8 }; t }& r: Q4 ]
Note: above comparison is based on the assumption: 2% realtor means 2% for each side realtor (i.e., total 4%) # b+ _4 u5 C! n' |* q6 N1 `6 G/ t
|
|