| 
  鲜花(1 )   鸡蛋(0 ) | 
| 本帖最后由 xchen 于 2015-12-4 17:02 编辑 & C/ z/ X) S$ _5 u4 o9 Y( s5 B. J  U8 g. A$ r- B/ _3 G; f! j
 
 0 z' x* _  S2 m6 ]% _5 yIf total is 4%, then, calculate the amount for traditional way for a house sold in 400,000, you'll find it will be 4% for total (100000*0.07 + 300000*0.03)/400000 = 0.04, so the same for both.
 3 l* M* q4 T! I0 R( l2 t! t) C1 |9 K, v. e0 }& W: ~+ o
 Let's try to calculate the rate for the traditional way: y = (0.07*100000 + (x-100000))/x => y=4000/x + 0.03
 # ~2 U4 C2 P$ Q
 * |& ]% e1 Z7 I* o: e) b* ?comparing 2 realtors using above formular, you will see : 1) if total sale value (x in the formular) > 400,000, traditional realtor < 0.04, then traditional is better since it's < 0.04; 2) total sale value < 400,000, 2% realtor is better since traditional one > 0.04 3) if sale value is 400,000, both are the same..
 5 Y) Y3 ?# C/ ^8 b" R
 . K" r- U, m* @8 F& q2 {Note: above comparison is based on the assumption: 2% realtor means 2% for each side realtor (i.e., total 4%) 3 C0 ?  \' Y& Y: w  P
 
 | 
 |