 鲜花( 332)  鸡蛋( 23)
|
本帖最后由 一盎司饭 于 2015-10-5 13:53 编辑 7 w$ [& I! I4 P$ `9 E
7 t1 v, I8 W0 q, a
2 T% s* T! C$ D; V( n
你想问“为什么PC有盈余”,答案很简单,就两个字:
6 T$ L2 w+ c1 B( z3 gRalph Klein; ^3 y2 R2 B% S' Y$ o- T' v
/ l" e* a9 s$ b F
我下面列举了能够查到的历年的省赤字情况。从数据可知,只有Ralph Klein任上是有盈余的。在他之前,要上溯到1985年,也就是30年前,才有盈余。其他的每一年都是赤字!
- ?$ n8 m$ B) q+ T4 W9 ]0 `1 I4 o# l
所以结论很简单。如果Ralph Klein参选,我肯定选他。如果没有Ralph Klein参选,我有充分理由相信PC会赤字。从Stelmach到Prentice,已经充分证明了他们仅仅是用PC的名义。他们的政策和Ralph Klein完全不同。Ralph Klein一上台就把省府部门砍了1/3,这次选举只有WR提到了裁减。你用PC10几20年前的情况套用到现在属于刻舟求剑。事实上Ralph Klein在PC历史上属于一个异常情况,Stelmach/Redford/Prentice才是PC的本质。Ralph Klein时期是没有WR的,右翼选民觉得PC可以代表他们。Ralph Klein之后PC往NDP靠拢,才会出现WR的支持基础。0 a T8 S; @" ^& k
; k; n5 }5 U* o m6 j' c- M& Q6 S4 T6 Y% \ `
5 E2 b \: {7 T) R D5 o9 z4 T* qhttp://www.edmontonsun.com/2015/ ... it-in-three-decades
$ _8 M- U' n y9 V1 hHistoric Alberta budget balances:/ \0 M: S: j' I: Z/ A" C
5 V9 p# g6 }4 U( k4 s7 K1981-82: $2.133 billion surplus, U0 L4 Y" V: {& B: o3 q
$ |( i3 H( _1 B# G! n# P
1982-83: $796 million deficit5 I0 u3 [$ }3 u( ]- `* O* Z
# g5 V5 b7 W& r9 |6 r1983-84: $129 million surplus0 A6 w! l4 z3 U, |% J( v
% ~! G$ d& D( N- i* y1984-85: $1.245 billion surplus$ o( B! ~3 Y, ?) E. ^/ J
; n$ C7 x. b: r8 L( r5 @: z1985-86: $761 million deficit
- [ l2 A- m" A( D
# \+ K) G8 {5 y3 s5 g& Y1986-87: $4.033 billion deficit
8 ?& T$ j( c9 ]9 b. k
% [ k# s: K/ c- o1987-88: $1.365 billion deficit
! x A! |7 Q" I' w# b, Q |* E$ B3 _; F, ]" R+ V5 ^
1988-89: $2.007 billion deficit
0 e4 q' \ e3 I# ?. B- I
3 `) _* Y: f# r; e: P; m: C1989-90: $2.116 billion deficit
# q I9 m3 v3 F+ q+ H( l: @
" \% Z7 _$ p/ B0 v: Z" j$ g1 a1990-91: $1.831 billion deficit
% [) f2 x. N* m9 l$ G9 n } G
! c) D$ Q( X5 u4 i+ q1991-92: $2.629 billion deficit% |& j, J* h9 n2 G* ^
* W, l) r0 V c# O) C5 t1 E1992-93: $3.324 billion deficit
+ D v9 r& M: T% k: i1 y4 @% F$ y) s2 k* R3 a
1993-94: $1.371 billion deficit
) H. {( ?- S& W/ L
2 b3 g: h; N( L7 X8 f- |1994-95: $938 million surplus
- s. m' b4 u! H2 j
2 t, {, `. q k) r/ U) h# K% e1995-96: $1.151 billion surplus# c7 M; L5 X. O) ]
6 S# r0 A, I8 ], V+ R) E% v1996-97: $2.489 billion surplus& t% ?' t; `0 S
' f3 n) f/ J T O1 q! H' _& L6 a
1997-98: $2.659 billion surplus1 N8 J2 O. ]) O' g
7 I6 }& q) W) b: B8 \( ^. v1998-99: $1.094 billion surplus
8 S+ \. P# E2 p1 b' ]
/ n9 ?! I3 |2 _7 O) z5 W; J y1999-00: $2.791 billion surplus4 I& h% s# u3 o, H7 J: v, N' H
) h$ x0 I; n* J3 H: V, L2000-01: $6.571 billion surplus$ c4 |: ^6 f! P# p4 [# ?$ Q9 ]
% Y$ o% a9 {1 f9 X5 f2 ^& w4 _2 X
2001-02: $1.081 billion surplus8 W/ c6 S" a2 F$ T ]+ F0 L
/ ]- v2 c9 L0 `) V* W
2002-03: $2.133 billion surplus
2 z- t3 P2 B: M" I" R" T6 ]! x4 N( |5 d. D- r; c# o. h8 l$ u1 j: w
2003-04: $4.136 billion surplus
# z+ z P7 P# `. E1 j( r/ h
! V4 Y! |9 K# C& ?7 P+ a& G- Y2004-05: $5.175 billion surplus3 K' L4 R9 u( ]+ V4 F
4 n+ J9 f0 j* y# y; P
2005-06: $8.551 billion surplus$ B* v# }& }( O& o6 t7 G" q
+ w, Q: L8 x- W0 [2006-07: $8.510 billion surplus1 S( r& i& j# k2 n* r
8 |$ W% X0 L9 I2007-08: $4.581 billion surplus* w& X3 y" T! g8 z2 }, ], h) c$ Q
( D* p6 }' G+ f, B2008-09: $852 million deficit; x$ V3 V+ ^- J* A# X* t
; y! j2 U- B/ n6 ?
2009-10: $1.032 billion deficit4 T. Z$ J" z b
U# w8 O6 N" m; H( S" E( j
2010-11: $3.410 billion deficit4 b7 p) N$ p5 Y; l: X
9 w, D% d* M0 Y8 f) L7 O
2011-12: $23 million deficit
9 n1 a9 s7 f/ ]6 {( r! v+ y5 k$ L3 s7 t! {! X* [: T# M& [3 ~- ]
2012-13: $2.842 billion deficit
. f8 W# ^3 l/ W, ]( a5 y# P1 ~; o! V) {" A
2013-14: $302 million deficit |
|