 鲜花( 332)  鸡蛋( 23)
|
本帖最后由 一盎司饭 于 2015-10-5 13:53 编辑 / y* y7 @) ^ S8 W% P# B* L/ Y9 ]
! X" E0 P5 V! r# v% t U# c& I" h9 w0 j u0 d7 M
你想问“为什么PC有盈余”,答案很简单,就两个字:! M( h) o9 S( I
Ralph Klein! r' t- A6 E- t$ ~
/ X4 n5 X- F' z' b: B我下面列举了能够查到的历年的省赤字情况。从数据可知,只有Ralph Klein任上是有盈余的。在他之前,要上溯到1985年,也就是30年前,才有盈余。其他的每一年都是赤字!( F$ r/ F" K, y
9 j, T0 L& x- d所以结论很简单。如果Ralph Klein参选,我肯定选他。如果没有Ralph Klein参选,我有充分理由相信PC会赤字。从Stelmach到Prentice,已经充分证明了他们仅仅是用PC的名义。他们的政策和Ralph Klein完全不同。Ralph Klein一上台就把省府部门砍了1/3,这次选举只有WR提到了裁减。你用PC10几20年前的情况套用到现在属于刻舟求剑。事实上Ralph Klein在PC历史上属于一个异常情况,Stelmach/Redford/Prentice才是PC的本质。Ralph Klein时期是没有WR的,右翼选民觉得PC可以代表他们。Ralph Klein之后PC往NDP靠拢,才会出现WR的支持基础。
& Q+ D. a, D$ ^5 _6 x0 Y6 v7 K' _4 E1 Y$ b* O6 J
6 A: k1 D0 r: C5 @2 \1 Z& ~* Q' l! Q3 c
: J* k) q3 C# R0 J* V& ihttp://www.edmontonsun.com/2015/ ... it-in-three-decades5 @9 k2 A a7 i3 l, a2 N
Historic Alberta budget balances:* @: Q, H& p8 H$ v9 a" a
2 C. U) O% X S1981-82: $2.133 billion surplus
L' O* G8 R0 [- W
+ M0 A6 Y3 d- i* q1982-83: $796 million deficit0 Q5 S n* z# e2 x5 n1 t0 P
# a8 ~/ j- L3 ]; G! j) V
1983-84: $129 million surplus
" n; j: w# N% h/ g; F! [9 W, A! A+ Y' Q! F) F
1984-85: $1.245 billion surplus! \* z2 Q; d" s1 a) }3 H8 i
1 Y6 w6 t. g& Y. p1985-86: $761 million deficit
. X% ^3 r: l _) E! c: t9 F6 ^) W/ y! p3 S! x7 D) R+ g
1986-87: $4.033 billion deficit
5 s8 z- Q& `( R x! E) |4 g( U; g3 A5 E3 p# ^3 V. ^$ }8 V( J" w
1987-88: $1.365 billion deficit+ I9 d' B1 p* F, \5 C5 c! s" ]3 n
. X- X6 P5 {4 M) L; z1988-89: $2.007 billion deficit, @+ q/ W) i& X6 t# ?% r
' \5 ^- x: d3 w1989-90: $2.116 billion deficit
. z, J! R. y& n& j0 |% o* v" ?% y
! [. k% C' |7 g4 h1 `- j' d. M1990-91: $1.831 billion deficit
% n5 W* D* E! T8 J6 \3 F
5 V5 M+ @, {" l, P1991-92: $2.629 billion deficit
1 o7 E9 Y' Y% U- }- Y+ @
: Y! e# M: c, n1 E; Y, [0 ]1 y1992-93: $3.324 billion deficit
# L) @/ O$ e- m% D- k/ a
7 U9 J" Q: m$ K" h, n$ c6 H1993-94: $1.371 billion deficit& @" a0 e! \1 P6 s
, p. B% o+ C. \1994-95: $938 million surplus2 s j# ^2 j; M/ N
4 ]# H; h2 N @+ h- J1995-96: $1.151 billion surplus* A k4 X( w5 @& r
3 \6 ^# I! E/ s+ J+ K& b [/ ]1996-97: $2.489 billion surplus L/ K! i, [5 k. W
6 ?, }1 u1 O) L1997-98: $2.659 billion surplus
" x, P' E f/ q6 q0 R0 a3 r& H2 e# c+ b- A& e" u! F1 j% `- Q
1998-99: $1.094 billion surplus. i+ ^; m$ h5 h9 D7 T
( M) z8 t" ~ S. y1999-00: $2.791 billion surplus# N% l y0 H; `; |. @! l
7 f) p8 n z1 ?# I- Z' f; B
2000-01: $6.571 billion surplus
3 A; A+ u! l" p8 N+ G! g a
, b: p2 z, x1 ]0 @; a/ F: D2001-02: $1.081 billion surplus
! L" C. k; J+ I& P: ~. f- R, l e: R+ f2 a
2002-03: $2.133 billion surplus- I2 l8 `+ e) j
$ d. h. |, ~6 Q, K0 v1 Q
2003-04: $4.136 billion surplus6 @% H/ }# c- C4 J3 c# L& q
- r, |8 g. _6 ]) @/ V4 o2004-05: $5.175 billion surplus
4 D) V& y6 q" k" n+ Z5 `6 K9 D0 b9 [2 u# c3 o
2005-06: $8.551 billion surplus' W1 r5 ^2 o' ] b" a( i9 J) T7 o
$ t, \5 i, b0 N2006-07: $8.510 billion surplus
3 B! E9 g5 I( n- u! I
; ?4 [" r1 r7 |2007-08: $4.581 billion surplus
; H" M; C& C! n; U; g
# F! [4 a \3 R( r6 L2008-09: $852 million deficit
) U5 j2 R/ O6 _# b; k9 A2 w1 q- ^2 P4 t5 T, e
2009-10: $1.032 billion deficit4 d/ m# b1 e, D1 g1 W
1 ^+ U+ l; @7 f% C( w+ f# o h1 {2010-11: $3.410 billion deficit6 |" x4 l. {. N/ Z+ D. @/ J
! D( {: a2 N/ U7 T' w* K
2011-12: $23 million deficit" t0 y3 p3 U$ S0 w: w$ i; }
7 Q: H9 i# ?5 R- T% I& H
2012-13: $2.842 billion deficit
( U. ^' |, ^& L& p& Y+ p m; `6 N9 _- }4 p6 [: T
2013-14: $302 million deficit |
|