 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable 2 e$ d% o0 w- `; j4 [+ p- Q9 x
% P: i( k9 V/ K" U5 C6 d
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
- W d3 G! h% ^) U* c
( k& z _2 \" q" }, i! S( Y TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
' ~7 }6 G' \7 ?6 Fexhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
- {% Z1 v& m/ @7 Z8 E. N' N8 I! _' Cquarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
& y& F' i" W8 c* D. {* O8 i _in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit* k5 m0 f% }/ J# P, |
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
2 ^3 ~7 v2 \- h5 i. _2 v7 V" q$ Omore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
# z8 |# p1 U! z) V0 }/ O5 z9 AQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
- n$ \9 m* z+ v$ Q8 _: A$ K) YLePage Real Estate Services.
! n8 o# R+ x8 K" x2 g3 Y7 ^' N4 U b7 i4 o' s
Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
1 z( q* G7 x9 n5 q* w3 Kare forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
5 H$ \' w0 C6 cconditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and5 ]6 l2 h+ s3 |; Y1 ^
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the, X& g! o" _. R v2 @% {# y$ Y
residential real estate sector.
+ w; P9 c$ U6 ` g: m, {. C" f3 s* Z: [7 V" N2 ^
Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation; E- v# w% l$ r$ g( s" \
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)8 ?) B5 X! b& P1 h( ?% X7 h
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
) m# X% `! `0 L& r' `(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
% T9 G7 P5 T1 |0 b(+13.2%).
, H+ F% I( N4 ^3 |9 P( @0 z0 Z, S- B. q/ a( |
"Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
; |, @. c/ ]4 Q. ?1 j" L3 Nduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the$ ]& C2 @2 m: X
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
O1 K& s+ j' `5 tpoised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,3 @0 A& g" `' e6 S0 U) F
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.$ R# p6 D0 N; W W
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
* k' k$ ?/ a9 ]( }3 N; {welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy1 c1 T* K: I5 o
balanced market."9 m* X2 A' J6 K c% g& Q/ Q
3 ?. y& n! U# ~# y
Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,. W' I' G3 T1 S# t. N
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
/ q8 {# n* G' Ato balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
5 l# K6 P& v, j0 ]throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core1 P5 P4 Y- X9 i% U" c; T% J
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,2 _2 E' A; {( D- Y
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
8 Q% l6 A2 x; o1 h- E7 b% kbreaking price appreciations.
7 y3 L" s% I9 M3 [ s) y3 }7 X
( x! M! ?; C; a% d9 ?# F: V Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
! p7 Z3 c5 B( W9 @( reconomy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the" H4 ^) {6 ]# P7 V6 f
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
* A" C4 E8 K! d, G
0 i. h! e0 `0 [; K In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
$ e9 V, ]7 D- W2 v9 \8 Meconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer6 _5 G! \ H; K0 s7 c# A* }" x
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
o2 T9 M4 O' K9 ~slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
; T5 {9 V( D$ e$ SIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
: u0 U) Z6 [! s$ ugreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of! x( W& r$ ?% y4 E) J4 U' J0 W; i
price appreciation when compared with 2005.3 W/ n: q7 C/ ?8 j9 @
$ U, U9 Y1 y! k8 K8 {* q5 ] L While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing. t7 R: N- G: d j8 c, u9 D& ^
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
4 z& [% Z% W1 ^financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
# T j% p5 K( b. s8 f' R rare markedly different than those found in the United States.
( k4 u9 \" C6 b u4 a
2 P1 q3 K4 G$ D4 u/ z Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
' v& C1 a( k( W8 |, |9 RAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
' ~3 F* U3 ~$ ^, ]6 W7 i1 ~favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the: N I& c$ r- j& P9 X
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general! y& ]$ w# r0 u
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
' o E8 a: p" n# u _# Qdownside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and! u8 o" B- X0 b% ]$ [& N! h4 t* p
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization/ p) \2 Q0 R" D' N( P
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."+ E9 _* i- f1 m( p" p5 i9 j
# J* |5 n0 A7 v
<<6 y# H+ D, t5 l( p% _; _- `8 t7 m
REGIONAL SUMMARIES
; F2 Q5 K. J: P- \2 Y+ x1 t/ j+ S >>
% z: v" A8 X% \6 c8 u- w# G0 m9 M, S. J: d( F. V# r E
Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
1 A/ h' j @' c* t0 MHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate- x: { ~. V. C f3 @
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
! D2 J& z+ _. S8 Xlooking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of) I$ _" g4 [) z% @( l! L" V
renovations.) g" Q2 V# p8 F: {" E) I) J
& b' T0 L% Z! { The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight& f! p( l! j( ]5 v9 `& d0 b T( A
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation! s& r; t" ]/ y! w5 ^
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
, `0 a- p3 R: fSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
& P& h- D* J% ?' u4 k2 I. \! i0 U
The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
1 P$ i# V% x( ^ M5 [3 @/ Gslowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the5 j1 L4 x$ F0 I) K. O
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
/ U3 R% \ B4 t600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores0 U% Z) R/ s& n; r/ _+ k* h
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes9 g5 i. I1 N6 q8 v
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options." t% ] [8 h6 I q% G, a
/ c, b5 s& G+ k/ Z! b, h1 t7 A0 I
In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced5 `. @6 i* R4 u5 I
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
7 {( d5 ]# @% uhomes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
7 Z0 J7 d5 e0 F# E% C1 D$ ]/ jwas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
% a% T& D( j7 ]0 \ t& Qdollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
$ T1 b4 ] B% b# T" @. P3 U& U8 cbuyers with more options when looking for a home.2 ~$ t$ W( r2 r+ D: m
' \: S/ f5 M! H! W! h! e% i* b2 H
Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly% d+ t# }" @% p* R+ ?
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
, E& {. F7 L( ypriced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,6 V- P4 x" s3 a
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
/ }& A3 s& T7 Kfew years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
. e4 q: K9 I/ ^$ c( j
% n: Y' H: W1 u8 P, [ Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
! X9 B& Z& q" rprices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory6 |7 _; J$ O% E# C: o& `; I
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
' p2 I& U* C" Lfirst-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,& F$ Z8 R# D0 h( R
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
- g& ] i( d3 R7 m1 H1 p+ Ipressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before# p0 G$ B6 R: N/ c8 i; q) j
making a purchase.) A0 r" X" x/ A% l
2 W' d6 W2 a X& M& p
Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
& f6 b4 R9 T! x/ g; Nmarkets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
3 M0 j% l$ W: U$ l wconfidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city* x, w7 F5 o1 E# x1 |: h/ y9 N% F
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting9 O# K% \! `7 v; N* Q
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown& S9 p0 t' c, y2 p1 b
amenities.' n* J9 i) x7 X# Y/ z
8 ?8 J1 b8 c9 Y, F
The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
- C& T- e3 o# x* j) E' C. {throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand$ y, W5 G# G# v7 f2 R
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
9 q# d9 D- ]# u: u" ^8 Ncontinued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
; h6 K" Y; N ]4 A0 T2 r- `driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
7 c$ m9 I4 f+ ~/ eresidence, rather than for investment.
k4 ?' H3 N0 f' p' d! u6 j |. S8 T, H5 m* t0 O7 i1 {1 I' }
The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
$ M, k& ]: ]7 bhouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted: V9 k# H% I m: n" ?4 `6 |! A n
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer2 `8 @/ Y8 |, R/ k" a4 ~$ k
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
/ T; o, C2 L+ R: d) Mrate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
2 S' |2 n" x3 |3 othe market.
5 Q6 t+ f4 p. M. M8 z- B6 f; r/ J
0 u; Y% X/ t N2 g8 Z5 D% c* s, z2 Q In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
8 H! m6 d7 f2 \3 E( i" [July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
5 q. t/ _7 J9 _August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring+ U( e9 O5 ~8 h" e9 Q# \( g
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
$ i4 e) ^( S4 d0 u' Bto the shortage of available inventory.+ Q5 T7 S0 Q" i6 l* G
8 I/ Q7 E! B5 }$ n% J: _2 j8 `6 }$ f
Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
& B$ C9 ?# ^$ Q' X5 Umomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
' |9 N, J: ~" J4 `, wvibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses& {' u$ [5 F2 f# U2 }2 t! f# ^
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province./ z' B% X0 @* P: I. J8 }% F; G
8 G! {, i. w4 U9 [1 G
Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
& J5 g% W+ K$ j/ b2 Oin the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
2 E8 D# ]. M9 \! E4 Lunemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that6 G' m U6 P* G {) ^1 ]* A! H
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
) R3 D) `. d0 Q. K) a5 L0 Vprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
( r+ j) S. N6 d1 Gseason - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as& O; f5 M; v: m$ R/ [: V
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
. ]2 m0 i- C5 ~( [
$ N% k: r: a/ Q: \6 |! C# b Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
6 W9 Y2 e/ i+ w: Z, T! X1 e7 das activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
" a: M) B8 r2 I! d8 \remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
- A: _9 Z6 ^5 v/ lmaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices, q. z- {) S+ ?. F, a& S" @ b
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
% b; ^8 B( ^; J3 d' o# a& Gin the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly; _0 F) N' ?( V! t
towards the end of 2006. 5 [: d/ [: L8 j% d4 j- A) u
/ e7 |4 x! ~! \; KWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
* i% L. w0 Z6 Finventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable4 J8 K" h/ @! U! k6 V0 I) X
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
b! t$ E1 @ t: q# L i& Qgroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
% Q/ v9 r/ g+ v- ~; M/ Xforeign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
8 y( B( `: A; V- H( O6 y, Xpressure on tight inventory levels.$ ^* Y& Y: \( x! Q) \/ |1 n& s) m0 A
5 i S! t& }+ ~5 S5 U# u" {
Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
6 b5 N. C. L" Q" v& V2 j% _fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
5 G6 h# }) A9 j) Finto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
* S, ~/ i+ |$ Vwhile increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
0 N% ]* F' u8 ]& Dfor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.' \/ @/ E& A' }5 t* y' h
* D3 j. r' f7 [2 J
<<1 p: ?+ a7 c7 e; d1 m
Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 20067 \8 l- p: B3 v- b; P, A! F
; c! Y5 e; p" @3 S4 |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
/ _) o" x7 R" Z1 I( f" Q) E6 H5 V Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey
$ Q& w+ D5 J# `! Y -------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 y3 `/ o8 N/ y5 I0 T 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q36 j, w# l6 P p6 A$ v. ?! o, x
Market Average Average % Change Average Average
3 a9 Z$ r: @! M e: b! y -------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 E3 W/ S& |7 z# k9 b0 m% { Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000
& @4 m1 r) c% ]& _. f -------------------------------------------------------------------------2 e2 \. f; H n: ~1 J9 A
Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000
5 ^8 v9 a* E' Q. E' k -------------------------------------------------------------------------
7 O- ^: _- ]) ~6 p: m Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000
# P$ @7 ^6 n& F2 \) k) n: {# T -------------------------------------------------------------------------
. R+ x, t- b8 ^! x5 Y" {" k' } Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -
, H% E: m# n4 i -------------------------------------------------------------------------
9 f: c8 K( k: D1 \ St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333
( I0 M5 J$ v; L0 u; a" J$ |+ c -------------------------------------------------------------------------+ W0 Z7 ~- {* S8 m% c
Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583! K' h: t7 _- p0 l
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 K% `. J8 {+ o Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185
" f6 D. ]9 l. [, `* X4 U -------------------------------------------------------------------------" y2 }1 L, @4 l" `" W. i; W
Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,2508 i6 [: {2 A! d% G/ B
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
" b. `; Q1 O, D! e( F$ H9 d5 } Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766. z+ _. D% L' H; F& w* T' x0 F
-------------------------------------------------------------------------: Q* Y$ ]3 w1 r- c2 z+ W
Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707
& ~2 k [: U' M! H8 e -------------------------------------------------------------------------; j8 r+ V! G# S# Z. j, b
Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500
) |: U( l9 R' j) g2 S2 H9 v -------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 E" g' K( H9 k5 n Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389
! D; c* |1 e' L/ Z8 _ -------------------------------------------------------------------------3 ^7 M/ {' y" _& I
Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714' C& W5 N+ \# M) s& e
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ E/ M$ c. c0 }0 t9 Q, c Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500
% P+ v7 z! i5 G8 |* D$ o7 r1 B. H -------------------------------------------------------------------------7 z3 B, b2 {! o6 t. a; ~, k4 c8 \# @
Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000
) l8 `" S; y; m6 \2 ~9 z -------------------------------------------------------------------------2 C% m+ v4 B9 ]
National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860
$ o8 [- m) \9 K% C9 L# z, U -------------------------------------------------------------------------% O7 V/ M! c; Y6 \1 }1 ]
; Y/ @- A9 B) l -------------------------------------------------------------4 z4 `4 ^, ^. p
Standard Condominium G" W q$ S) R0 Z7 R% v
-------------------------------------------------------------5 i4 N- ?0 M- d
2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo+ ^/ d8 N- J2 M$ O1 U! Q) u
Market % Change Average Average % Change$ [4 c* l. w% H) ~3 f1 c
-------------------------------------------------------------
( W( \! t8 F) W# O" \: I! l Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%
6 a l1 x& u1 H$ K -------------------------------------------------------------
5 c: v, r) Z) c. f% \ Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0% O; v) u5 K: G1 n
-------------------------------------------------------------6 H! X; P0 F% A, g; f/ u
Moncton 4.9% - - N/A! x" e7 K7 n: J4 D9 f' G. ~
-------------------------------------------------------------
3 R3 S# i2 M$ I1 J& r8 n* n1 h Saint John N/A - - N/A% K2 {$ c3 P+ v; L8 F
-------------------------------------------------------------; I+ G: f3 y! `6 C4 {. K+ ~7 D: u: ]
St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%) o4 R6 ?# ]* P) ^! }! @
-------------------------------------------------------------, ` D% v2 \' q' X
Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%
# U- r. Z8 `6 K1 E$ z6 c. A+ T3 g -------------------------------------------------------------* Y8 A: b2 F" X3 t. ]
Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%' [* X# x ^. N. t/ I
------------------------------------------------------------- M5 ]# [; _7 n' N
Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%
( D k: U/ J7 a3 o% S2 w -------------------------------------------------------------
; X0 j! p8 j' t& C4 H; |, W+ \ Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%
+ P! t$ a" A9 w. J6 u/ l2 r -------------------------------------------------------------- V2 m6 {7 Y' P2 B, F
Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%
2 W% T7 U; S3 S" u2 Z* n" L -------------------------------------------------------------
8 n: z# s& E2 j; x" X# u Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%
" x9 t- B3 I+ ?0 D8 f -------------------------------------------------------------
8 f' N5 n8 E8 f. G% {$ G Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%$ I4 C* \. n- e) k% c$ m8 I% Y
-------------------------------------------------------------
; r- f) z/ W# [' p3 S. u) E Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%( U$ ]- i+ @( g; \, ?9 \" k, j* }
-------------------------------------------------------------
: G8 `) v2 G1 r7 y) } Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%
0 {0 A( |8 ~* l1 a \) C -------------------------------------------------------------' l" |; e% B, A4 M h
Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%* E! H4 _7 t3 g: i
-------------------------------------------------------------9 ?' ~, |- {8 ^! }$ q
National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%" r; K/ Q. a* c+ r; \7 O& T8 n2 c' R
-------------------------------------------------------------
& Z; y3 s0 _$ a7 N% r( g) m& I >>. v9 r0 C' W; l4 q: R; \+ b, ~9 [; {' w
' ^% x' ]! k" ?+ y% ^" u; j& ]6 L
Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined5 _8 I0 Y1 X# ~. I; @4 L
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint3 q: L# k6 \. z: Z* ?
John and Victoria.) _% Q N0 H% ^+ E
, ]5 R1 K# |5 L% K
The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most# i9 g2 V4 n2 u& c+ D! X* `
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
3 J0 d0 V% e$ U/ X" S" uhousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release& j& |* ]$ O; l
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price1 S: j6 n) t& \9 R1 y3 a
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
7 E5 I- }* ?2 `2 z! l! Facross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is3 U0 h4 C3 ~ a8 T, L$ Q8 V7 P
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current n8 P& W8 y5 |& P2 {: \4 K
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable4 @2 ]7 B9 r* j3 ?' N, j
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on1 h) u5 z% C1 {8 s# T7 a
November 15, 2006.$ O& T g9 T9 Z) M9 {
Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
# y/ E! s# a* g# m# d* z2 Pfair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge2 j, ~: y4 x- a1 t( A: I6 K# J
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
, U$ d1 z' u3 A% @3 ]9 R5 ~& Navailable for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|