埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2257|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
  y0 G3 ^5 I4 }' [3 v
. e( l. E) D. q  u4 j3 L# s& b! }- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -" a% W8 q  j: B1 L* {$ }  e
; f  q3 v+ `; o, B% o' y. m
    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market7 m5 d: k2 b: O+ g' V7 v
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
; J2 e# s- i4 L4 T" @2 I! a4 F' Gquarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic/ W9 M+ q. @" u" H( i
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit5 K# _- Q& g; @- d1 ^3 I* H
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and, s- ?1 R6 l, f, t! \
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario," u& {' ]3 S2 c8 j) m% n* p) u' e! ^' w% u  F
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal) ^- a0 B8 a# f' o; ?: v) w; G
LePage Real Estate Services.
. o. B4 `6 E- D4 x! W
( Z" k- T% N3 V- w- M8 |! `    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters9 m( S" F' o9 Y& {5 C. w
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
( X# |) ~9 `) ]conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
! g/ l) F- z8 ?- A7 L2 Bsound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
. L" ?4 L& c+ A- aresidential real estate sector.1 d6 `( S* G5 u% }

* L$ f" R7 A! p, d    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
8 Q+ W1 Z  @& ~occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)& p9 X6 I+ h1 q7 ]7 L; O
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562! g8 Q, M4 f% ^, k- \
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380  S* r+ g1 c' g4 @/ J
(+13.2%).- f  @6 @9 c, C+ z

/ @3 E' F2 F2 \% n! m    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
$ E% z5 [% B  i  g' f) Zduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the2 t! X) ?" I" _+ `
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
( l6 p/ Y) J) Qpoised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,8 r8 D* b, a% K7 m1 @3 i
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
; t# ^5 G) E4 h  v5 d+ {"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
8 p+ k" S& k! e) s9 Cwelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
* _$ L  y; z( @balanced market."& g6 y1 {  W0 S" G

6 \  v4 C- \8 C# s    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
8 e' R& n0 l& p; O* n6 o& Kconsiderable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift' p% r# \0 q0 K5 s" i
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued+ A5 l' _& ?, m: e; r1 l' [
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core1 K- s' P: R/ a: X9 a
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
/ @& ]1 l, |: O  k: k% j; q; c7 |manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record" |$ j; u" T( j3 ^9 L0 r- B
breaking price appreciations.( R! h' n" ?7 L
7 W7 Z) M, Y& d" J  x! [/ o
    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
1 ~6 r5 @8 ^  @$ s/ V' V& Reconomy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
; g$ k* X: Y9 z1 k7 l4 ~largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
  g, t& v4 f- l  u9 ~/ |: G7 G6 z5 Z% E% M4 m* a" ^( c' U
    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
( _8 K7 q! O6 {  J% @, P% s7 peconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
& q/ E; j4 W: U* V+ kconfidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
9 Z- s' s4 B' N# A' |5 pslightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
$ d! s* Z6 S& NIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers) B0 n3 F5 g0 `6 N/ G+ _
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
4 \: c6 `; e! n: p8 |3 wprice appreciation when compared with 2005.
" w3 ~) G: z7 M: ?  v$ |
5 T! D& I! H& a& l; J: n    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing9 L: Y/ X. {, k, g
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and0 J$ z) v  @. i& i  _* t  U
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
4 N+ ?$ _/ W0 d! y) P# t5 Nare markedly different than those found in the United States.: Y# U/ i# \/ T3 Z+ D. h

4 N0 ~# I" c/ R  H    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the+ \6 m& F: _0 [6 o! `
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
+ z! ]& Y+ J9 ]4 u8 C5 Yfavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the6 ~. T# Q# _( j- ]6 b: X
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general8 K: b! E8 ]3 b4 Q; s3 g6 ]% u* @
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the8 c4 ]- [: i% E
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and8 c: ~: ~0 `& z4 x7 x1 j
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
  @3 ^% t' d% F' \mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
# v; i" A7 B/ j5 K- w# a3 z% I) B& ~% O
    <<
6 M, M* w: G3 _                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES
" ?' P* z0 v( O. i( W    >>
  h% H- b" a, @) C% {, N- m* H% m! }) `) v3 a2 r
    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
, ^5 A- l6 I& Y  K0 gHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate3 q- Q) d* \1 `: f% {  W
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time- L: ~5 ?, x( p' B
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of) T5 y6 b7 \  L- Y; ^
renovations.
" v) U( d5 e- {+ M7 y6 }) I/ j- w2 w5 i4 g, B; o
    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight5 \+ p" p  l! b# M/ I8 N. i' _
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation+ z8 q" j5 Y' o# X0 J: Q
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
% |+ ~2 u8 c6 x* v; Y$ \* SSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
' Z- L1 t+ G% B3 S( z6 D. L
. E1 ^$ c. J3 c' H( p    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
: |2 _6 q; \: h& v" Tslowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the* X, m1 l0 t# B* i+ @
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
' c- b5 h4 q2 `* E7 |600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores9 x8 Y3 `* V/ W( q4 c+ s' L
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
/ Q# x2 ?: ~' }and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.% m+ q# K) g4 K! ~3 I
4 A' Y  m9 p' v; }" R, Z  k
    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced6 ^* B* S( }9 k1 \! o$ q1 V& m
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
7 A! C6 }( _  r0 K% s0 Mhomes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
: \3 a2 R7 i0 O. A, Y5 qwas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
# Y1 w8 H2 v9 B* e6 w4 U( N0 ]5 Mdollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing6 ~$ X2 V. k3 \7 X8 s4 Q
buyers with more options when looking for a home.
. k3 ?0 G6 C) d; h' e, i3 }
  x9 T, j# k* G+ Z$ W& {, {    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
: z7 o# o/ d2 \among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
: O6 O9 O; ^4 k$ fpriced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
  Z/ ^4 C. e3 Tas some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
- T/ c: u  l1 L" ]+ y& zfew years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.5 o' O( i8 ]( \7 l* G. c
5 T  g) D, `6 w6 S, ]9 S
    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house: P3 W+ D% [3 G) _# b: u
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory. q/ G' @  r; Z6 G
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
3 I! V$ v) J6 m/ S: W$ c: Zfirst-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,, S/ `# D: G( k* e
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the* c& ?; b$ D6 S
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
9 d, @8 [+ \' b4 Y+ g/ Ymaking a purchase.8 Q. z$ G0 b3 K
$ v, _$ S4 {* K
    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
+ A; F" ~& H' `  j  z( s$ omarkets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
. \) ^, I4 S# z5 A8 j0 p) T3 Oconfidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city% d3 r# _( o  ]  u4 }' j
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
' C/ [/ v8 f* S3 z# tattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
+ Q+ s7 ~( r- g7 i6 M- q! l" ]7 iamenities.5 G0 H+ Q1 k& c7 Y1 t6 e+ i
3 T4 V; v! o# x( U6 u& M4 f: h
    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels/ }- z2 A# Y0 e6 v- R' ^: _5 m# ^; A/ c* d
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
  W8 z7 ]- w- f  D2 O0 W5 Aacross the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has/ U% Q. J7 ?, S6 d
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been/ l/ o0 u0 s/ I# N
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
' X5 ^5 V# j2 jresidence, rather than for investment.
, G) Q4 }" g9 T$ N
& \0 C2 ~1 m9 k8 B" U% I    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as5 |# r: a: F- ~8 a, N
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
) u0 X. h  s: V. n) }: z0 J: L3 Tin a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
( ^7 q7 [2 D- v" |confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization: G  ?9 D: a' n
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter: d/ v" |) A9 u* ~- P. E* R7 S
the market.
$ P6 @0 [3 \  a8 S! ?% m; \" Y
+ _6 s6 g& G+ P- W# p3 Q6 g9 c& v    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through: m1 l2 i3 J: S- `* P$ V
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
; f- ^& i& e( D9 t# q  D+ x2 kAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
+ Z9 I. \/ k8 j7 Jmonths, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due' S8 G# Y; x  b" B
to the shortage of available inventory.
. N, d: o* ~; p, ]) l/ x2 m5 i7 c9 C; S: v$ R$ s% I8 s
    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its; ^5 L2 o, ]5 ^: U$ a: E
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
, ~( b, g# f9 @$ f0 m' ^: u( Vvibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
3 B. C; j" N- }; Kstruggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
: I! ?) P: ~2 m5 v7 B1 o: [) |1 Z
' P' W, r( G- F/ g! J' q    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases% B, K! g. e$ S: Y( p) a
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
6 a. O1 {& d* {; _: {( H/ y/ E0 Nunemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that: L8 f7 ^$ h' h8 M
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring+ f7 g9 [) _0 V) r$ M! ^
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer8 L" ^. C& d6 G8 Z% n/ `
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as! O; I6 i! M+ M' j, w: a
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
3 Y% Y+ u: U1 K& G0 ~" N! M

. v9 j5 B( T6 ]2 M" x1 T9 ~# p    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
( s* {0 K7 B" U$ n3 ?( n4 Kas activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
3 \; C- H  x- Y* c# D5 Sremained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
- ]* \$ f- N9 |maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices$ ?, |  c) A& Q# {& K
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
5 c; p& i# |4 h) min the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly# V$ z. h1 @( ^
towards the end of 2006.
   
2 v# h- \# E: w4 ?0 h+ H/ f% ?2 C& d8 ^
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
- o, H: {1 l0 s8 q3 Dinventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable  Y2 Y4 w  D; ?* y8 E
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
1 ]. o8 N& r( P$ G% Xgroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to$ v. A( ^8 Y& ?+ c
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added& Y+ q, M2 U: {% I* b3 P$ u  |+ P
pressure on tight inventory levels.
1 F: }  v# c, e+ Y! j
  p- J( V; p  V3 q    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic  V3 ]0 r: h! q8 B9 U' ^' Z
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
4 y* U" K' Q& x. I3 L# b4 ~7 D  H2 Pinto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;" D( k/ |) k& E7 c" `& O2 c
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching: R# r( F& q" j4 @" s+ ~4 ^" m
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
+ i, V& a& c, C  y3 v  }. A# G0 \7 v; N0 g; Q2 w
    <<
) n: X( ^# w* {9 v: _! |      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 20062 I; w  |+ N, t/ z

8 X2 |: @/ s3 ?. ^( p    -------------------------------------------------------------------------3 a5 s2 E* ^$ x& k
                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey8 n% ~7 R& _! }3 J0 d
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
& B, T( B7 `8 K# ~) ~                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q3
7 ^7 E$ D* E+ B' w    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average
# \3 A, Y; _& a1 q    -------------------------------------------------------------------------& f: \& T* l7 ^4 R6 ^* X  w5 f
    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,000+ ~4 }, R4 w9 ^0 i
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------$ d0 M+ x) V8 ?2 b5 t$ a$ \
    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,000# J  N0 }5 n+ A3 W- c
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
. V' B0 p' L# p    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,000
/ I3 g- f: _! |8 p* L( C    -------------------------------------------------------------------------$ P1 y+ h4 g, F
    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -
, U; I6 d( v: u& G( ~- J    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
" x) ^  ^% X# U/ h3 ~# Q7 m6 ~8 z    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,3333 @  V9 m# {  X: u3 \
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------; }- ~$ Z. l, L8 _& s! W' |- O
    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,583
, x4 V8 U& g, k2 s8 c0 T    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
" _( J1 u- m4 ]: F3 r! D" K: T    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,185
4 i2 M* I: _9 O3 h7 t( V5 w    -------------------------------------------------------------------------/ c% @9 S6 c8 \1 |  d8 \, _
    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,2500 c6 L6 Y; H. x! b& m& b
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------, b* x6 Z+ _: x+ L2 T. }
    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,766
, T9 W7 c$ y, l/ r0 n4 w2 ?0 |    -------------------------------------------------------------------------0 A/ x5 \. t4 q: U* B- a; L9 M, }/ z
    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,707
9 U, T/ S& R# o9 `4 z* ~6 R4 p& v    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ ?1 a) m& m) o& o    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,5007 }/ h! l' r& b6 s8 K. s/ T. I
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------# k5 _! Q$ L' \8 W/ B- R7 j' J+ w
    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,3891 o4 j( ^$ m4 m. g  Q. N  M
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------/ E# w4 {8 G$ [4 e' L9 L
    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,714
* ?) c& x# y9 {, _4 E' G    -------------------------------------------------------------------------1 z/ \0 u; o/ ?& U$ a# I
    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,500$ m( G* S6 c* l; S
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
# j) \! U+ d, L$ a5 j    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,0001 g  I; H/ K( @/ x0 S/ M
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
' T/ j# x+ I5 z& ]1 a; T    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,860  G' J0 e( c2 O8 x5 q! a" T
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------; w$ U( w: G* e) _6 [

+ e1 j0 [3 s$ N    -------------------------------------------------------------
1 A1 ^) v  z7 a: r9 H8 b6 f) x, z) N                               Standard Condominium
7 W4 w$ T$ C. n! u5 B8 u0 u    -------------------------------------------------------------
5 G+ Q5 i6 g; k- M" g: C! n                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo
/ d1 s' e* ?% u- d8 Y1 x( o' s; ^3 {    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change$ q) ?2 Q. S8 G7 i9 @( C
    -------------------------------------------------------------( T, C$ I; X( ~4 Q
    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%
" g: l: P% u) j2 b! o2 D1 I. ^    -------------------------------------------------------------3 ?  \1 i3 i& U7 b( T' \1 b
    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%
. f7 n3 W" K% o% U6 y    -------------------------------------------------------------
5 Y7 d8 P6 z+ v0 B8 ^7 ^    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A/ D: ?5 N5 r6 p; l0 b$ x4 y
    -------------------------------------------------------------: r' r* U! [7 D, X; P/ X  O: B
    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A
( B% n* p) K' K1 A& ^    -------------------------------------------------------------0 k; |) ?9 m0 _! T
    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%
: G; P6 j# a0 M    -------------------------------------------------------------! I$ Y/ P$ f, q" q/ b3 x4 w
    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%
0 \! q' E6 k- W( d! ^    -------------------------------------------------------------$ u: G& ~. j5 Z% ]0 S3 C& j
    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%
- [- V0 U; M) @  r* ~+ h    -------------------------------------------------------------
, R3 r: I7 Q9 K" d9 z' D! {    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%& Z$ X5 }4 v4 T: |
    -------------------------------------------------------------% l, B2 O0 \2 J% i  O7 z+ v
    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%% \  \% j+ V4 R, Z+ S' x
    -------------------------------------------------------------
$ {. a. _3 B8 M  Q1 H$ ]    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%, p/ J4 g. o: O; G  Q8 X
    -------------------------------------------------------------8 L5 t# G# m/ h1 h& I& A: u% M0 a7 H' f
    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%
# O" s4 p7 Z% J    -------------------------------------------------------------
- I, b( m! Q  \) J; h    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%
1 L  V+ Z) U" ]7 A6 S$ g! Z) L    -------------------------------------------------------------
4 R4 i+ \; V! W- Y    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%
7 v/ h; C( \8 }1 H# a* x    -------------------------------------------------------------# h8 b8 f$ s5 O8 a5 \# g( H' T
    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%
4 W" p3 O5 w7 h    -------------------------------------------------------------
6 j$ ?! C7 F3 J+ [; o    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%
0 G3 C4 |8 R& X0 {7 y8 C    -------------------------------------------------------------# d1 W  K' \3 ]& p+ k
    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%: ?- N+ w8 O: L# J( h
    -------------------------------------------------------------
- P6 I% b1 W: R  G    >>2 f1 d$ f! j3 M2 @
7 ^+ \3 m  g  `8 c/ V! _
    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined9 ^# j3 s4 ^" K. p6 }: G2 M
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint1 [+ y  N' l$ g2 [
John and Victoria.
! R9 }, q0 a' k# y7 [/ ^4 ]
8 u( B6 o: U/ A7 ~6 ~# N    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
3 f  I+ \% L3 Ucomprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of5 h/ Y/ r: e6 e/ h
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release, {8 f  M6 w$ I0 |3 s
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price, g, b& i4 w; I* @7 H  b8 {; V
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities3 [; K# G% y  P. X$ G/ J
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
# X* Y8 h7 Z2 O0 J* g- \, g' |- J% bavailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current* C- W# h; J& t
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
6 r. r' y  d4 o4 a! h3 Dversion of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on/ H) x! D# S: M$ z8 Z
November 15, 2006.
4 C8 o* O3 ]$ E; Y" T- f    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
6 b+ `1 h. u- D2 _: O2 i5 afair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge9 H( G8 Z) q* z9 t$ q$ W
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
4 R9 i* p$ ~  |- U6 }available for some areas back to the early 1970s.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-3-16 22:33 , Processed in 0.079137 second(s), 10 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表