 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable / I$ @: q% U1 q ?% a$ d6 r5 m1 ]5 c( @
1 c- w/ ]) q1 p) u6 Y+ z
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
/ N! |7 o) w& h& M- c% T
' w3 M a) O* V0 D) n TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
\- n* o4 w: \/ O9 Sexhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
' c B$ y% H: T1 d" O, N, tquarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
; f$ l2 d7 L) t' q4 ^# ~" o: F+ n1 ein the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
, i: y- o7 O- _' P% h% q/ Iprice gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
5 m$ u! G% }4 a+ k& r4 p, {- K/ W' Fmore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
0 ?, v% O" }# B5 U& G" IQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal. O" O( A1 \( E5 |0 h# K
LePage Real Estate Services.
4 a; Z [2 J* _- q) Z% }* U- V5 { ?1 t/ X
Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters& u1 v% [ k0 `- _$ v
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
7 ]$ r' A* Y# ?6 c/ l7 S* fconditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and% G( R2 Y/ A" z$ P
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the2 @& T/ m/ B/ k' ]3 c: }, z+ U' {
residential real estate sector.( [) f: A- W' w" ]! C
; u7 B+ H5 L, t9 L& L$ @/ m% k Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation5 B: f6 q4 T: Q. X% r
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)/ h1 ?2 e: ?/ p7 p. n# F" E
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
$ c" |: w8 g* P# W8 H, Y5 x(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
, J. m* \: @, Q' s9 V& z& @6 f(+13.2%).
( K9 C3 x( T0 v1 o* Y* C
0 S1 N+ n/ j7 O' [9 u0 N "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth, c% r$ n9 d9 e+ |' U; n* o
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
5 ~2 C9 P, W* y& R+ K5 ?frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are2 I% s8 `4 y* C1 D( f
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
. Z2 y- c' h g7 Bpresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
/ c* [4 n6 g9 _"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We/ U8 `2 u. h) j) _$ @; ]* g
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
# O( J- A4 h9 e& X6 y& q9 Fbalanced market."
7 s& O/ y; B5 `. z5 h+ X# L: }* P) J- q1 j
Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,2 x6 q! F5 Z! q" ]3 G0 C3 j
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
, a; x1 h3 G5 A/ f% t. t' I8 nto balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued" r8 U7 j, O0 k% W5 g7 C
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
* R1 W3 V5 E6 i& Yenergy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
8 r0 B5 e' M4 w7 g* R# j0 i& D: Vmanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record! k2 j, C/ @4 p. H! ?
breaking price appreciations. |+ @) [9 i1 _- a8 f
5 x$ ~" E9 w3 F- L& H
Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
( n% X/ E* y1 L: s0 Feconomy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
; d4 M$ N* k. s: Mlargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.4 s* c' S8 n( H; T- r" L
1 x; D+ {+ n$ i T, x
In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
8 M1 B8 f1 G3 x" feconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer, ^' ^5 s- b# Z9 i& A6 v
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off) A: Z% O$ C( J0 x& B3 d
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.1 m( @/ l' H2 w; A: ~' E& A8 m2 f' h- X
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers, V2 z. x9 o5 C" {7 s
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
+ O$ y" V, _0 s+ Zprice appreciation when compared with 2005.
' K; d" u0 M* d0 D0 X$ S% ~* j: [3 ~" }
0 e2 x$ P# S/ r9 S A6 G. E While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing) g( k8 F2 J' s7 G, `$ `
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
& [/ u5 D6 `+ x( Q1 p y5 I: nfinancial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
' |$ G7 ]6 ^- V ^are markedly different than those found in the United States.
) [# P, n o9 y! [+ i0 a) u0 m/ p' e" m$ G, w; V. J7 ?
Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
6 a! p" E9 n7 UAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's$ r4 J8 s& n6 L# W- }5 r) C4 L9 o
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
- B; j; ]! A( }, _relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
8 W( q( @# L) u1 f; R8 R& Oaffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
5 `0 c. |% h: \) k+ X, p, \downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
3 i$ I1 g" ?6 a- kaggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization: h4 s' e/ d) @! `
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."5 i: V3 s2 j4 ~8 r1 j( v9 m
0 T4 n: c$ Q) x. U4 p! K <<
3 f$ d0 A1 i4 v1 Z REGIONAL SUMMARIES
; t. Q; J1 m: O; |& W( e9 K/ U >>
% V! a, t. n* g, z8 u8 |/ W2 u/ ^1 t# E3 r1 ?; F! I$ @
Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
4 {" |: s1 R5 F9 m+ KHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
. {$ w$ r5 ` n' h1 \0 h4 U0 E8 T2 Wof price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
' W( Y' e c) w+ flooking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
' O* d0 S( q( c9 ]5 r+ f' {renovations.
% j! Z- W5 Z! e8 S9 J1 I. a8 F% i# h; r7 p$ w# x
The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight" W1 B9 X6 V2 |
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation6 M! ?4 o) a0 x
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
" O' M2 J* _( L, c9 \September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.; n, T. D9 a1 C7 v3 N( |/ S" w9 v
9 F H1 B9 O" E, t
The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
: F) V" F6 |+ y5 {3 _- ~slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the/ H s& n2 a" |$ d# G4 D+ Q
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new4 V' }2 M' Q2 l5 s2 Y- U- }
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
9 c0 d& h' `- P1 Hto the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes5 P5 e/ P6 s4 v1 B4 D: R' Y9 f
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options." m1 c, N5 ~0 |& P' g
" J4 i6 A1 ^/ F7 ]
In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
, s8 x! e+ Y& k5 g9 B1 jconditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their8 C7 K7 v9 U8 Z. h* Z- F4 C& |- |
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers5 M# }' Z0 v% M8 [
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian ?4 c ?8 Z1 E9 m" @. e
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing: X. O. a1 f/ `5 n9 Y {
buyers with more options when looking for a home.
8 {# n" D& s- O/ Z" N8 V8 z% v9 U, |7 a, \5 G+ R3 Z
Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly+ K% s+ [- S( D& O" Q
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
- I7 Q! r, D/ \1 G' [priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
( @+ J2 j3 n* \as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
, O2 i" a5 t% A! N3 a( {$ Q0 dfew years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
7 X8 O& X# B' y% @4 C" v9 o- }( x
( }# N0 I k' C# f' i. m Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
2 ~. {9 z( }8 { X& h7 c. Yprices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
. `1 e- Q8 @7 p9 Wlevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting3 r+ |7 J* Z4 i6 D" G
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
6 J( T$ z: K/ k7 U# [when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the6 E/ f! }6 }7 E1 @2 c* U, Y0 E# U
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before/ `; n6 h" s+ ^/ W! w
making a purchase.
& `4 ?6 V* e1 n' `9 C/ v$ w# p+ o' P! F& B) t0 _9 ]# a1 y+ F" |: b5 y
Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing" y" ^6 f7 r2 s' u7 Y' h4 c* U
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong# b! X" f( o" V0 u- q+ }+ o! _. c
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city- G9 @: F. x9 @$ W: v' f7 }
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
9 T& L, ?- h# Gattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown: \ z" _3 A7 m) ?7 T% ]
amenities.8 n8 `* W6 q( a3 b* H& ?
8 t$ v2 H/ E) m4 [1 l The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels3 u6 ]' ?. d, {) T
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand: J( Z8 f& ]" {' I& T* X; D* O0 D
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
5 ^- F# g/ {( b( r, a' a7 |! Ncontinued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been' B8 h4 A" ^" i
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle( A0 e6 |/ k4 a8 `4 {) v- |' ~3 {
residence, rather than for investment.* J5 }6 z6 I' f; J3 }- J- ], B. b
# \5 O$ ~+ Z$ s( [
The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as# I$ w: v+ V9 \/ r
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted3 C7 j9 f7 }, e" h$ H( Z) ]
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
" f1 ]) L6 W( }; `$ c0 u F/ m6 zconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization6 v% X1 C0 H$ c4 M3 g' d
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter* h$ h9 y! z- i
the market.% k; ^! P; @4 q4 Z" G
2 ]) X: g9 @% q1 K( Z+ }
In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through* j% E2 i8 Y: S4 V p
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In- F& i; X0 A0 _9 O+ K1 O+ W5 t/ I
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring0 L) V7 E+ i$ S. {
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
* |0 p. f! i( e C" ~3 hto the shortage of available inventory.
/ ?( a e- U' y7 e9 p0 E4 o
; R# q8 g/ o& t/ i5 \+ q( l Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its- q/ p* n2 [" a* X
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains0 l8 l+ l, A0 l; s5 l1 j
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses" \" ]5 c9 G9 d% x
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
% i" m( |2 N4 D1 v9 l: i _* A6 R
Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
* d- a2 q0 K+ i8 |in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
3 V' I5 ?0 C& f1 }) s% v2 Runemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that6 |6 I! D2 `0 c& u
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring9 x+ N3 H; \( J+ y
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer2 S( N- S+ t/ \, x$ V, h3 g
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as7 r. z' C. L, [. p9 U) S
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity." c2 B1 p* i( ^) P, r) M, s/ F7 _
/ C! J2 e5 J% r$ O Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
. g2 D! j4 }: V: U, ]as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
$ r5 ^- o( X+ t2 Eremained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
6 Z& q; R; F+ U% J3 ~) I3 {- bmaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices0 x2 J4 z- H. I2 K
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
* J; @! T+ v: |& _1 ]% E! S0 Cin the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
) i' D3 V8 v# O6 e: @8 k. Rtowards the end of 2006. + Q# Y, v( k! z) a) ]6 i8 h
2 w9 w7 l0 u4 {While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of( e/ p( s4 F% W/ |/ B
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
; Y; r% _/ n" l# Q# ~ t% Xto meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
# `, p- h" B. C6 o/ Agroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
$ _1 }8 l3 b- I! D2 z$ a9 `* [foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added) h7 K+ t9 J7 q% w% G
pressure on tight inventory levels.( E$ r3 {- ~) X9 @, {) V' N. O( a
- l6 n$ n: v E; K! T) d Q8 s
Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic& C# w- y, ^; m4 [
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
r6 x% B3 k4 h: f0 vinto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
9 L H; G' S. u' X ewhile increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
3 M" w1 t4 m: Pfor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
: R" n: ~$ z9 K+ A: o* I: i; O! P9 Z
<<
/ l8 J. V) A# |4 D v Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006- {- Q% I+ a Y
h, ~( K: ?& g2 U. u -------------------------------------------------------------------------7 J; `+ T) {* s. r/ @
Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey
% b, s. |, P$ u- v$ _6 S -------------------------------------------------------------------------% h2 z) p7 e; X! u3 ] }
2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3
% o9 `- b( k. z/ k# _; f Market Average Average % Change Average Average7 O9 e( ]2 B* @: J- W
-------------------------------------------------------------------------& t9 i( a$ H* O( i0 E9 ` P
Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000( _' @7 A& H3 f) v
-------------------------------------------------------------------------$ X9 Z5 ~3 I# y1 H K
Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,0005 g! F% q9 j. R$ ~
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
; i. @- a+ D8 r8 M9 m3 w5 |1 D Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000) e4 U8 L3 ^: N3 d' v/ z( o
-------------------------------------------------------------------------+ N9 i! ~2 i6 _4 e
Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -
# e6 A/ t4 @6 y0 k. y6 d% V -------------------------------------------------------------------------% {: y7 P7 Z; N, L
St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333# ~1 t% r* i4 c4 R' k0 \' ~; Z7 P
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
# z1 }# E, M- ]: K7 @5 M9 b7 A/ h Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583
( R( {) `5 p: X4 i2 B8 U9 J- ?0 r -------------------------------------------------------------------------4 ^) N7 t8 F& _4 u) F( U
Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,1851 O; w) V. c' } r" l! @2 R6 ^3 I
-------------------------------------------------------------------------1 ^' @( Z( g" O5 i
Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250
6 B5 }3 F& ^0 ` -------------------------------------------------------------------------% |* W y& A8 [
Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766
: n, u0 p! F# t. J+ C% R- s: P/ [ -------------------------------------------------------------------------" I0 T1 Y1 i/ l
Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707
; k; c7 w D* u1 V/ | -------------------------------------------------------------------------; o4 X+ X1 {6 Y, ]9 ]
Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500/ ~2 b+ ]$ E# I' I: @
-------------------------------------------------------------------------7 H; z$ u; |" y2 i" z
Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,3892 P. `* e/ {6 s2 L8 q
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
! A+ y& Z$ Q) L+ H/ N& Q Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714/ b+ T* z1 u2 }0 _
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
" ~: X( q- Q/ o; l/ p Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500
4 V) i d2 z2 z7 B* q( f- Q -------------------------------------------------------------------------: X6 ~0 V7 L! S4 @
Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000: d2 g4 N; V# H. p5 P
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 ^# s: ^5 J- l; l National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,8608 x8 d8 `6 f+ F1 d& T1 Y9 \: m
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
5 d! _/ q+ r6 Q- l6 i" V' a5 T
. x. A" I! e) x9 h# A -------------------------------------------------------------6 {' R8 Y( @! Y5 M* m
Standard Condominium" y8 p3 P. B, @2 l) x: r- a$ {
-------------------------------------------------------------$ l$ d( H! m6 w3 O3 q( Y* J
2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo6 q8 {. `- [, O( E
Market % Change Average Average % Change4 D6 I9 u( S9 o, D7 G
-------------------------------------------------------------+ \* _5 k8 Z* }% l/ K, R
Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%" g% d8 ^: |) F: m9 r1 Z3 {) p1 H
-------------------------------------------------------------
4 r4 m i' }+ \+ X7 X Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%
2 m9 A# u |+ b -------------------------------------------------------------
5 [0 ^: q4 Z7 i Moncton 4.9% - - N/A
3 |2 U; A2 Z6 u! v& ? -------------------------------------------------------------
7 L1 U0 ~2 s6 ~6 `% R: j" X+ c Saint John N/A - - N/A! k) D9 Z& S/ r3 M
-------------------------------------------------------------
! x; `9 W4 S% ]2 ]9 o& } St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%
8 w9 a+ b/ {4 X2 s -------------------------------------------------------------2 M) t7 v9 ?% {' n- R
Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%) }" W1 x2 _' C* v
-------------------------------------------------------------
2 z; ]* i/ G" C C @ Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%
, T5 g7 v* L: c. [+ p- U$ v* @& R -------------------------------------------------------------
/ l* L: b9 M- y/ Z; }" y. Q! K. { Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%9 \: |* d) ?; S
-------------------------------------------------------------
1 x+ q" _2 j4 }) S, M, u Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%8 i. _5 Y9 ~7 }1 f9 q4 [
-------------------------------------------------------------( a: [+ y( p9 H6 l) Y$ f; k
Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%& U: x8 Z4 E7 n
-------------------------------------------------------------
2 A9 a3 C T6 D1 n4 q Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%
8 ? G$ b- m. ^. D+ W -------------------------------------------------------------! G8 |7 K' d5 v; M* x. K
Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%
/ ~1 P( K j* }$ g! B& d+ T ------------------------------------------------------------- K* N+ i. y- d/ D3 c! Y1 p! [
Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%
$ \0 K# ~% q: }: U- `+ R+ D: F -------------------------------------------------------------9 N$ b8 W4 n. A. e5 F u# g# J
Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%
7 t* A) o3 p' L& f -------------------------------------------------------------
* ~% A: C- `( P# {3 L Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%" ]5 f$ }* E& g& ~9 X7 O
-------------------------------------------------------------
8 i+ L! U& ^. ^" M& j N! R3 @2 t National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%! A0 T* u$ w4 X ^9 q
-------------------------------------------------------------" J! F* l/ {: n8 h$ d2 D: m' s- i
>>3 J1 ]) x. V, n' ?' D7 @
) i9 D6 R6 J+ S9 N2 S! s! W Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined# ]. X+ L' G) W1 r+ p
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint& }' T0 X! x( Z9 i2 L0 |
John and Victoria.
1 T$ P- g1 s" T2 Q: Z: h3 |1 Q% z
The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most6 B: F+ j, B3 L, T8 Y3 Y5 S
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
1 y) Y$ I# r) a d) Q) {housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release9 ~( [+ ^; Q; H3 P+ }
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
% U0 V+ h2 n/ g: M. t) Ctrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities/ d3 l0 B& |# V6 Z
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
" t! Z) P" R' w/ ^available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current( Q# S4 U' }1 D. p. _
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
9 V& B$ A% t3 v$ bversion of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
( E/ M0 C& ^; M9 i' j2 e0 j' h' _8 eNovember 15, 2006.9 ^" y! M$ L% X, {
Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of# }( L2 ~% [# b( `- W. K( c9 `5 _
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
# s4 v- A; A. [1 Aprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is- x; L/ r9 Q8 u1 f# J
available for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|