 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable ( b8 O( s) n+ j$ R# x5 I% K
' w. f4 ^! W" {5 { s- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
, R$ E/ X0 Q, p
6 b0 O" q3 s. N9 O+ m TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market+ G. g: w9 N5 ~$ a* m% Z
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
" m& F7 o5 Q1 F7 ~$ U4 q% dquarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
+ n9 m, @9 W; A9 E* ]6 r7 zin the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit1 `# Z" X7 p. k% S6 `
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and: t6 ^) z1 |' V# |" N* @" k
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
# F' H8 W& b7 ^9 a+ I- DQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
" h6 {; L5 x4 \: CLePage Real Estate Services. U5 x3 T9 i% Z8 c& w# Y+ T9 N) r
2 {8 r5 c7 c( ^) k Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters8 v! m, a+ ^1 Y4 T8 t
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic! o( k1 k% w- J% K: r" \# U: m( H
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
8 `+ }( a3 g' v& [7 rsound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
% q1 q, _! ~0 wresidential real estate sector.0 i' x; L0 f- ]$ A
& j" d) W& \2 [. X& y0 U
Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation; x3 X/ `: w4 W- p
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
+ l8 a' m& g. n- Hyear-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
: S X2 j; z6 D! x( G" M0 Q(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
- v3 X4 g" B' D% Y: {(+13.2%).+ U' a; r; c8 `' R# F# b! a+ T
: ]/ e! O, G1 Z& W4 M+ z9 ^0 h5 a "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
& a6 r% j+ x( C* Z/ Kduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
. ` [ M3 G! h9 Z0 Hfrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are; { }) T' d2 ?# I) r
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,4 J6 f5 } \+ w
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.8 k( j1 |, \1 x9 f4 ?
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We/ h$ E+ p: X# l3 t
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
; y9 W( g& u8 d* a" Tbalanced market."
+ }9 Z# l" h7 l9 Y& Y* A9 d6 _
( i0 A7 m2 O+ t Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,# u) i6 A% b& n' u- [3 {' @
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift! ]" }# D% Z, e
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued! r* u3 z5 s$ w j4 L
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core7 ~! Y: P9 g' v4 R
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,% c8 c/ V6 P, j5 Z' [7 @% t; c' L
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record0 v; ~- N% i% a1 _: d8 a
breaking price appreciations.
) D/ W. t4 b( f/ y/ l s& u" j$ K" z# R! Q5 m# @
Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding% b, N) |2 k% ]& c+ B, a
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the. ^8 U& S% c2 P+ j0 w0 S* n! F
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.% C b% ^" z) w
$ z0 x# N9 }5 l
In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
6 q6 p1 y! U4 |) {+ l7 w8 p; oeconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
3 B @5 L" W) o% a" h X3 bconfidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
. F3 \, j' V8 A Xslightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
3 q0 y. C3 G8 e) d8 CIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers7 V" L' J0 X- {8 {% y, Z
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
# |! L9 Y0 s. H' wprice appreciation when compared with 2005.4 {7 g' R0 M+ r/ m; Q4 {4 v
0 n# a0 C# H+ r: I6 ] While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
7 r- ]' G0 n" t" P( D3 M+ H, fmarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and- Q3 \% c* m( H5 n! h; D0 ?
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada" y1 d9 a" F3 s: \( h+ W J. P
are markedly different than those found in the United States.+ l1 `3 A0 ]$ G3 b9 d
. G6 ?9 x# Z6 c; F8 @6 K" ~: t Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the4 s& ]$ M) U; K8 o: g; N$ u0 G4 Z
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
* \8 ]% D2 x* ~) ~& k, a7 ^$ ^favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the7 ?7 I. l8 }* i3 ]) u) @# | i7 ~7 c
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
1 i+ h: u1 }6 Uaffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the& p; s9 D" M4 [+ {0 w. G4 G
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
8 _" v& G0 P) n; c4 [& X6 zaggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization. }" z) U2 C5 K g
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."+ C% _* q! Q { U& s; v. |, }
& J6 j- k, N, _) n; l6 S <<2 G1 E; O3 _# S$ _' p
REGIONAL SUMMARIES9 Z5 X+ V0 x( n) a. K- V( E/ m
>>
3 r" G# U- Q4 ?; m, L% s6 Q% @- `# {6 _) [+ }' q8 G8 F
Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
( {; w* W; T8 P) w( JHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
, R! l" O# l# \7 N1 H) N; X( Gof price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
' x7 K: F/ x5 flooking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of- V! n8 L/ A0 Y: ^8 D& h7 K
renovations.
$ ]* y. K) V, v1 G2 ] G( v& J4 L4 L1 I0 K, @1 e9 R! Y0 a8 Y
The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight8 z" [. j, M0 Z. R5 C" e
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
6 ?; x# H; _8 u7 L p! \compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and" H' O* ~, L# w% O
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.3 S' ~ X. V- p9 t2 l4 D
# J6 G7 |3 `# i2 x0 M) | The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
% B3 S# M) \- g3 z* W% c Yslowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the* n: N+ d: A2 W3 i- p
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new d$ }: F( P. \
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores3 Q8 w7 G( T- \6 B" r$ [
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
2 |5 R5 A& [+ S+ ] r4 `/ ~) t2 qand are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
( H: ^* j6 u7 `5 [& j0 @8 i
9 x: i7 Y" K/ A# D8 u: c, J In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced+ I& A7 v2 L( s; k3 `
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their1 p$ w8 ~) {0 m* ^6 A+ _
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers- p, _2 m$ R% g6 D+ G
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
0 D: K; }5 x8 D9 h9 Cdollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
( U/ r: }! z* Cbuyers with more options when looking for a home.
$ c6 d9 f" a5 F% {+ ^2 T6 D) B& X1 e R, ?: L# B
Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly' v( V! R. D3 `
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
' I7 B: O+ @' B' ~priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
1 k- K' R6 ?, u) C" P1 ~7 Aas some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last4 ]6 o* _! h$ d7 ~% i
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
6 @ v& E2 ?' A. } U) Z$ K7 z3 C
+ _7 {3 Z$ C2 H8 [& \" H, T+ [ Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house. I/ W, H' F; J K
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
7 E) `: {/ g- l1 g8 ]. Zlevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting3 q8 ^, ?1 [' o" L! M* w7 e6 {" e
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
3 D/ h$ ~1 Q$ H6 Twhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
# `! s% Y6 P/ V Opressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
3 p, S- Z8 ~5 u4 Lmaking a purchase.+ \6 o; j% Z; `6 y9 H7 S
' S* j2 T" g. ~& i; y Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
6 P6 r/ ~0 I6 q1 Z- mmarkets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong( \8 N, t _2 x8 k- Y
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city6 H$ d' t3 A6 X1 W' N7 M
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
+ i1 O2 P5 Y: y8 l8 Q% l- @attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown. |; h2 n* t$ g8 u5 T' h5 W- |
amenities.+ Q9 O" O( }6 @# b1 h
) C5 f& ^ T; X5 M+ Q' C) T: a The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels# q" Z4 _0 q$ a( z5 ~/ z8 Q. x
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand: D7 r% |6 w) a. |9 u/ O
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has/ t% c/ r. Q- g6 ^1 K
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been# g( m$ ?% U* F7 O0 M3 k
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
( K+ F" Q" |" h: T+ sresidence, rather than for investment.* p1 F% u/ g3 ]
( D) S6 h# L; b The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
% R6 I+ V! |4 r- ?! C8 yhouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted5 u0 Y* ]. M7 {' G8 t$ V n
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
5 x- K' Z" Z) Y& x, h7 uconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization6 Q/ P% n/ h! `& g% w. D
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter- d& @) \) _6 v/ W& _# ]
the market.
& ?, k% a( n' h$ G( M/ d- T! d9 E+ v7 u! W5 j) C& V% @
In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
$ `+ z/ ^5 }$ W, c3 I2 U$ OJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In- j9 m$ ?5 r' N8 Y! m
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring9 x2 y1 k9 h8 q4 Y' M
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due/ _3 `" }+ L7 S" c! P R# l
to the shortage of available inventory.
. v4 Z# @" k' {3 x# u9 n& t+ u0 {" M) W9 S
Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
$ @0 [) }/ S9 t' V2 mmomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
4 p3 H% B2 Z! `( l0 f' S& |% bvibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
- n9 D, I) \3 Q. u& c: I q5 \struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province." H* N \& Y9 d8 d, H
! o1 F" @% ]- k# N* K `
Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
/ f' h0 ~+ O' }$ {9 iin the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low' {: U! V, @2 B
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that4 j- l' F' g! T% i" J
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
- W& G0 e0 M+ `0 yprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer5 I- p# O' u( P& U& d* W
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
* c5 i4 E! o$ ]" ~# S& gbuyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
/ L5 v( F: A( E4 h4 z& X
0 w* b& F" B; l Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
2 d7 r) ?3 M7 I2 J2 ^as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton* u! I1 y7 X0 D
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,% D; N& P7 Z, O0 g
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
7 V% t1 d p& Rincreasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
9 h5 b9 { [5 Lin the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
& a5 E2 C6 Z h7 Qtowards the end of 2006. 5 e. F. J. X Q+ ?. R
7 |- ?/ ?) @4 T' }+ F2 J6 NWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
7 x/ ]( q) O9 c8 t+ Linventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
0 G0 H5 Z6 I4 L6 ito meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse+ \7 t( R$ Q$ Q5 [" H! \
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to8 n, g" n5 Y- N& r8 Z
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
0 a/ m) ~) A& ~+ b9 F3 \pressure on tight inventory levels.
- F+ i. c' Y! ~: b+ E0 m) b/ R
+ ?8 q) \; F$ a7 V% m- @ W3 j2 s Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
( k Z- |( d0 p- n0 dfundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
/ [' l9 @: c3 b) Ninto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
; B8 Z" h! C0 p8 S Xwhile increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching+ n3 J j7 E, N4 x0 y+ ^
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.. ^$ M0 c9 F* j0 t" S, ]
) [, p$ I7 E5 d5 _( [' c0 M' W) A4 y
<<6 h$ B& Q C# \9 H5 |/ `
Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006' S& ~& E6 ^/ A5 \
1 b$ K4 W+ I% K. Y; p/ c+ i
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 {+ _5 v& E' R$ a( Q% w8 w/ _ Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey
. _( F. Z( D' e+ I2 z% j -------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 Q0 h& Y4 ]% t* n1 ]$ `3 D( J/ E9 y 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3& R/ e, G2 e" q& K" b M2 [
Market Average Average % Change Average Average! N! u% D/ c( Q4 p" e
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
. T1 r3 Q! a& g& z( {% q Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,0009 F! ]( H0 G; V3 ~7 g
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ N9 O8 u, V; ~1 ]% |' Q Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000& q) [) Q/ F* `, G
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
% Y/ g+ b1 H' f% A Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000
+ X. ?/ K" g) q8 X8 v1 C2 R -------------------------------------------------------------------------# T0 I7 [) H: w; b/ |* ?
Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -9 G2 l! ^2 f: H3 H. B
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
. H+ n3 l; \4 t7 t) w5 w N6 o St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333
, \4 D k* A3 d! y+ i0 W -------------------------------------------------------------------------9 H9 t% m Z1 d3 _8 a5 Y" g
Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583, k. V5 g8 E' c1 k, g9 E( W& G" A
-------------------------------------------------------------------------) [1 u& ?& h5 S2 G0 U- ]
Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185
5 j# {# D, L. d -------------------------------------------------------------------------
. ^! G- f9 g1 z/ Q Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250
, u% M) N/ H' C) L! R -------------------------------------------------------------------------0 E3 g0 V) T( [9 ?$ Q3 b. |! z( t% t
Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766
2 `% ?8 L. a& Q1 E -------------------------------------------------------------------------
9 d( }% y" [0 k' w Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707
( W+ W# T5 i6 g& X! U* T6 u- V, i -------------------------------------------------------------------------! p2 B1 \% I+ V% v
Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500
! k. U" x1 F, G/ d7 D -------------------------------------------------------------------------9 i2 c0 R3 S/ N2 g
Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389" F( g' y6 T. Y6 q5 c
-------------------------------------------------------------------------# y. h) ]2 _0 _7 M
Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,7142 P' d5 |1 S+ P
-------------------------------------------------------------------------) s/ ^9 s X, J9 H' ^+ p
Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,5006 I4 p. a' _1 w* A) A% s; y
-------------------------------------------------------------------------. N5 I. a: {/ c
Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000
# q$ p% v4 |. O. j( Q -------------------------------------------------------------------------
[6 p- ]1 T* A# n d0 a National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860! N2 ]6 D0 ?- Q3 i$ L. _
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
' f; H' [2 e! K2 |5 C& N, c. G. Z |& V! G1 a0 Q6 h( S" E5 l" x" t
-------------------------------------------------------------: Q4 L! m% k7 ]+ T3 p1 G0 ^
Standard Condominium
) C& [1 k% u+ b2 |+ p' I+ J -------------------------------------------------------------
8 O: G6 b. R9 i; p4 F 2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo8 s& h g/ ^& m2 _7 m
Market % Change Average Average % Change7 [) q# W" C/ g$ K0 B8 {" z e
-------------------------------------------------------------
+ C6 ?0 g* H) R Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%
7 h1 L) [/ ^+ {4 t5 l -------------------------------------------------------------
3 D' x) |. w: _0 n k- |$ y Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%
8 z" w% z6 I& T9 f* U& j4 L+ k -------------------------------------------------------------
# E3 p2 e- K. d# P: k% f Moncton 4.9% - - N/A9 M* ^# H/ N% C# b0 V* I
-------------------------------------------------------------
* A7 n, b! j8 Y) _ C, t Saint John N/A - - N/A
) o2 U, B( j. {: x. @ -------------------------------------------------------------( e, c p) [5 q, B* g) e8 m4 Y
St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%0 `2 ^/ \" }) b# e' B2 ]4 f
-------------------------------------------------------------! W9 G) {) A; ~1 j; U7 f
Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%, ]/ a1 c8 h+ O0 M6 {4 d& h6 g
-------------------------------------------------------------% o7 F& X+ ?+ @& t5 J5 u3 F1 h8 d
Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%
$ r4 p) M' M7 N9 z -------------------------------------------------------------, ~- S8 c$ P* |, ~' j
Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%
8 z$ I4 b4 o; d; r) N; i% ^ -------------------------------------------------------------# l6 k; r6 B! B
Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%8 v$ \5 L) f% X
-------------------------------------------------------------
, _" z( W8 K( d& [ Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%$ ^5 P2 M7 t3 Y- b& z z8 f
-------------------------------------------------------------
8 G: p! m2 w) Y8 a6 p& N Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2% z o h% f4 t* S2 x9 D/ |
-------------------------------------------------------------
* g) v2 d0 B! G6 W P0 r# W" \1 V: a Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8% j! O W7 \: }- G8 d* I
-------------------------------------------------------------
: [/ V& s1 g$ L Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%1 j6 b: t8 T; F
-------------------------------------------------------------
- {# y) P$ `+ x, Q9 S5 ` Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%2 J* d' m, m* Y7 j4 G* S$ ?
-------------------------------------------------------------8 u' ` q. S$ U7 y' [
Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%
4 \* K" P+ c6 U7 Q# F" `' @( C -------------------------------------------------------------9 h9 r1 b. X4 ~ S. O( Y
National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%
" {! ?$ D) Y. m2 X& [$ e; d -------------------------------------------------------------
0 o3 ~; z* a. }& O >>
# \3 |- U! `' \. B
% ]+ I1 z) ]& c9 P( o/ x6 m& t) b Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined* e* Z" h I6 U' K U- I7 ^* ]) J
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
5 C' b" [7 }# R4 j# P' N: dJohn and Victoria.
& s( b3 R( Z! _0 s E# \2 }0 x+ Y" h6 n k
The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most9 A9 |0 u. D0 S# w5 S9 Z& n8 E
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of4 A9 i; m6 H. Y2 l# L9 F* F
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
0 V8 M8 g$ Y+ ireferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
, p+ Q3 G& k! j- ktrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
' r: {& b# h: Gacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
. Q5 L1 d& h4 C1 n' c) V( Xavailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current: M2 c' i* Q0 x7 S5 X/ ]5 S
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
3 ~9 t6 e1 ~8 T8 ?+ V$ Vversion of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
l* l# p i2 _November 15, 2006. {0 {0 F) _- p# }1 A0 U
Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
3 O. t$ S1 T$ D& f+ ~4 \fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge7 P5 T* \. G) z- ^% b; ^$ I
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
& x9 \) V& w5 j3 F+ D `available for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|