埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 1827|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable 7 v) s3 `$ R& U/ y2 _. t
! p* v8 s& q5 Z$ s" m
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -$ t7 S5 Y7 ~. f& ]  X) ]8 D' q
6 n' ^0 y3 d1 r9 S5 C
    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market% u5 h* u, B- b* M: Q# Z
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
! D  j6 X: v6 o' i+ ^5 y" Pquarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic, W. l9 i  G4 g2 |) A
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
! w1 O; V8 y/ }3 _3 w. pprice gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and9 b& `7 {% z; {8 g6 A8 b7 u/ D( ~
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,1 R( p2 A( N2 |$ W; W& a
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
9 y8 k& T$ C" Y8 W' T) QLePage Real Estate Services.
( b8 W2 Q+ w" }6 k0 K" q# V( D8 E; J8 m# f- d# u6 R
    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
; {' T+ |2 x* Z$ y9 r. K: Iare forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic4 @* O& f) r! P6 }6 G: m7 V
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and. P) ^9 T6 T" N4 \2 u, ^
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the6 O5 J; u2 z: [3 Y' g+ T; C
residential real estate sector.3 P5 w7 u' R# x( k2 P6 [. X) N2 O

3 o" a: ~6 c6 ]+ s6 a    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
6 I6 h- Z6 ^, [2 Hoccurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
1 [/ B- }) I8 ?- z  Wyear-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
  ]2 J  ^# ^$ i; d0 h(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,3800 t6 P5 h" v& u8 v  S, M
(+13.2%).
- Z; L- @1 B9 @% \3 ]+ n
8 B0 }. ]1 Q  d5 [6 l& w8 N2 a% B    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth5 P6 p+ w5 J1 e: y! G: W
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
- \! c' @( y1 }/ P4 Zfrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are7 `' x# V# G* j2 j8 Q
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,! l' v2 a! E+ B' C$ [# L
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.$ I* }7 W) h3 t- L- ~0 s& B9 J
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
  l, l$ F, \; n5 C- @" L1 Wwelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
$ |6 k4 Q5 X0 J) ]7 tbalanced market."7 [, G- J2 p) g
& {$ B% }+ X4 \% d: r6 g
    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
( k+ b% L, g; L- ~$ a1 mconsiderable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
9 {, h( H+ l4 Z) l$ p/ G( ito balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
, _8 G" Z% z( f# m, O( Rthroughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core( i1 Z' a$ k) c9 r! w6 m
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,' a9 S" G- |# v: A2 z; p  _8 k
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
& L8 r2 Z( m; T$ t. Tbreaking price appreciations., w1 B( @! L: [2 V2 Z

" B+ r8 _2 D4 k6 D5 I) C    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding. l) A! Q7 Z! g# ~0 l2 _
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the( }( Q  P& z7 I6 @% a) @- P
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.) a& A5 z& j, N, ?

, \) ~5 w; p  w+ \0 x+ `    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid+ p) c8 A7 I0 l* l& G. X9 T
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer0 ~7 q) ~# D1 i
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
( T8 @9 D5 R7 H1 e# u' Mslightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
) r) |& K& _6 Y' W2 a# g* ZIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers2 |) f  v/ q2 `% L2 g4 @6 K) N
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
; ]; ^& c- i7 Qprice appreciation when compared with 2005.
6 o- t, B4 H/ y6 I* _7 z/ _. k! G1 |) b
    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
+ ?; }* v7 U! v6 C, U, Nmarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and( Q+ r( U1 H; e" z* f/ V) E' z9 |
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
, y$ Q& U4 n1 l& W% s8 xare markedly different than those found in the United States.
" D- L5 N$ U% s- P9 r( U# j1 y, |/ o4 y
    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the* F9 j4 e, H2 ?2 Q
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's0 u5 c$ ^- _+ |
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the9 e; S& p4 _8 h: d/ \; E, l
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
3 h# P! R3 i" c! }0 U2 saffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
' }9 L8 d8 A+ }: C: Ydownside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
  i, |( n( d: w) laggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization( O! [% |2 i  L0 b! D
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
7 ^3 |* d0 L$ n, Z8 r
  f5 k. y* j$ y& o# B    <<
& K  |1 H" U# s2 U3 Y                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES
; }6 d: R: b& A0 h    >>- ]6 M+ `& d7 \" ?- e" O

% X# @( J* s; |5 p    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
/ z. r2 t% q& i+ Q( pHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
, ]3 E( f3 I( s8 ~0 `of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
' i# T. H4 `" ]! {looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
9 \7 C5 r; Y# R1 p$ [$ rrenovations.4 o" M' }, A" N+ m
4 j9 l2 v- R% @& j* E) ^
    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
- C! W; A: p! X$ ]increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation8 I" g, z0 q" G2 b$ l% a6 U# ]
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
5 |+ Q# n- e$ ]) `& `7 @  J, P' _September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
7 D4 @" C! X# g2 M2 B8 `
7 ?- h9 q- l* {. `    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer6 W9 v6 z% ~8 y
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
/ d# n' H1 L$ e- Fquarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
' s' a7 q5 G" F$ Q+ t600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores3 u: Q! I4 t. c
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes3 o7 g7 C  L8 Y4 i( \
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
5 ~8 Y( a' z% Q% X. X0 C6 j2 `" f' k0 Q: u, {. H7 g" W
    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced" ]# S- ^4 i  Y8 q1 x1 {
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their  W+ |. U6 M3 N
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers$ P% g. z. n( C% g0 u. a/ N
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian( \5 S$ A$ Y# M  {
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing" d  P1 i3 i7 e  x
buyers with more options when looking for a home.
7 D3 t" T5 i" w0 F3 F) l' o) d/ G8 V; I. F
    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
( j, [( l* y0 _& t( B1 }; Aamong higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
2 [9 z1 t( G! b. C  {/ Ypriced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
" m0 S% J% p8 \% X) d; Q( Qas some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last3 Q+ w& j5 i* }  w5 g$ f( _& z
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.7 z. n$ b" T& O. |
; U+ _$ U, s4 i% J
    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
; b. _$ N, X1 hprices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory) F' z2 V/ r% c; A' K* T
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting/ l/ @4 `" T. ^+ t$ K# l
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,( D, [5 F6 A& \/ Q
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
# z3 T! R! d2 s4 E$ [7 Apressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
, n) T; C1 \0 B% amaking a purchase.+ O2 D6 @! y% j, C3 R9 B" ?) S% D
3 v1 \- {7 B( H6 v
    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
- d/ K0 N7 l. t5 D0 N2 Fmarkets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong6 j6 U8 g8 |% O9 X% M! K
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
0 F7 w$ Z/ R8 w4 P# q9 Y1 x9 k. Qcentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
- E" U0 I  P/ v7 g; `attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
' |. _9 L6 G2 W# Damenities.
( t" b5 a, k( x' g' X1 w1 X% c! p* V$ g2 ^4 |  I% R! c: V
    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels5 j+ K" l- g& f( l0 @
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand" p$ l3 t' H( _1 X) y9 M
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has- Q9 M! q, @9 T+ I
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been% r! _( `4 d$ Y, @
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle3 Z" @$ W) t' u, `' B
residence, rather than for investment.
; A. W" S# P! h
2 V) @) I) D0 N4 E% s5 t    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
7 b- N1 }& e  n  y" r! c: o1 ?house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
) V1 s  r' E. ^. T0 B# t1 @9 G7 Vin a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
  d4 E$ \0 X% y1 ]1 Q1 nconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization9 R2 r1 d" I" Z  s! K: A9 i
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
9 @- l6 p0 [0 G$ ]5 |  nthe market.
" j  a; q+ z9 ~6 \, G) E) t, Q: d- \/ P
    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through7 H$ Q: S6 e6 p( n- W* y6 C: B
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In/ [, t7 ?( M$ J4 B
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
2 }8 x% r+ C# `7 a: B0 d$ ]months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
) i/ v# [$ O* Q9 r. P3 Z" Ato the shortage of available inventory.) w& p- _2 j0 t+ @4 d

) O. t: l5 B! Z6 q" q    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its) b3 B2 \. \; A- T0 l4 c
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains- j0 x$ @9 R- D
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
6 j8 ]+ \% |3 c) r, Q) ?- estruggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.* ^: o& m: j9 {( |
, O0 |; D) t9 g$ s$ @2 V
    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
5 t6 K" E4 X) N+ lin the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
; \8 h8 H; Y3 D/ s( S: w5 W1 Lunemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that0 b. z$ c8 [: N$ Y% n. w" a
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
  |# ~5 t5 C$ p* ^8 ^2 V5 R! Mprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
( p( P- Q* B+ useason - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
9 N1 ]( X+ W, B8 v4 ^" G7 C8 a0 nbuyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.

$ k$ J2 [; H7 F! t; u
- E: D. C, D* ~2 N1 I    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter$ p$ `8 S1 [0 x' f) \0 P
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton+ q/ p  S! }! G4 d) c8 Q( Y5 g
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,+ y- R2 Z2 X/ u! C4 b1 Y" G  u
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
1 T; J& }$ P8 e3 b( A) f' uincreasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve9 `" @1 w4 z2 Q( t2 @9 V
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly3 ^' B: o5 Q6 o# e
towards the end of 2006.
   
- h( I& t+ L9 x, x
  x, ^1 v6 ^$ J2 a$ d7 aWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of5 F+ d, k$ Q7 I8 F
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
- h9 X2 ]# k: m! {$ |% C9 @to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
0 n% L5 r8 _3 {& i% G0 hgroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
$ x* D, ?) \4 Bforeign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
3 r3 m; S+ ]/ \" J2 v: Jpressure on tight inventory levels.
1 o) w& {* j9 A
5 V( {% z$ ~/ O4 R4 _2 A    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic) V& f& P+ N$ U& ?
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
5 m& m9 _0 G' D8 u# Ginto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
' T5 t2 n% L9 s; y% t) r+ ]while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching* Q( h# K6 @0 \
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
; h# j8 t6 [7 ^# K2 C( U1 m7 ?2 z. u4 S- o& S
    <<
2 Q$ n) j# s, T7 {) _9 R      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
# U$ ^+ n' d& |( |# X+ K& }0 z' t9 y' S
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
' y" c8 g( F6 {1 Q! W. }( u" ?* m                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey# [3 m" t) H6 c7 v0 z4 P/ y& V
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------6 H5 [# l' l) |9 r! ^
                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q3
3 a9 a5 n2 ]* t/ ?1 l    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average% {5 Z7 t1 }/ E: m) z/ m
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------+ d4 M* P0 z* O3 F. ?
    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,000
- |9 J3 W2 x5 K' u) y1 E    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
8 u+ Z' Q: J0 P9 |    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,0001 _! l4 D  y0 v1 r3 g( W
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
- L& V: C6 M' K) Q: y    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,000: ~3 j/ h0 W+ ^3 d+ J& q! p
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
% Y4 V3 l2 v( I9 I: c5 u    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -
2 @4 d# Z( d- A& D6 M( T! o1 Y2 O    -------------------------------------------------------------------------& m, T" V8 ?1 v% S
    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,333
+ b) N2 w' K7 w0 V6 d    -------------------------------------------------------------------------9 H% \; s+ {3 H& _2 g
    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,583
/ s& n6 D, ~' \# z    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
% U3 a1 _( a5 z2 Z0 h% }    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,1856 e; s* g: t+ {. t7 ]$ @/ P3 T8 {
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 m( a2 p: h1 R    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,2506 w7 V" d" B# Q. u
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
- n# G4 c$ t  e1 ^# @5 g; H    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,7668 S: h2 q+ d  a" N7 d6 w# S9 H" J2 }- w
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------' O' r! h, X5 C+ t; J8 x! k9 H$ u2 h
    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,7075 a$ ^& V8 n$ r% h4 l
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------/ }  B! w( q; f. e; p0 z4 v
    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,500
; e( R& l6 W* I0 s; J    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 Q$ ~% W8 P. q' ~* q    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,389
* G5 s. b6 t  W% A- V4 \    -------------------------------------------------------------------------9 s' V7 p) K# j! @  i6 x2 j+ @2 d6 X
    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,7147 R4 m& H: @# D  g+ Q
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ h+ Q8 d6 s+ `) h    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,500
" v/ X7 [( b( B) U    -------------------------------------------------------------------------! }) [5 Q; T# E3 C, r" U
    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,0007 a6 L8 C( ~& x9 u( p
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------1 ~0 ~- L* Y5 l. _/ _
    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,860
; \! U/ f4 H, H. Y" d/ t    -------------------------------------------------------------------------1 y6 p/ x" W( z$ U7 s, k/ m' l6 H
) {0 ^% R4 _9 e' a8 Y6 N. C. W
    -------------------------------------------------------------
; q* S- s" V$ H' J1 f" X) p4 R) g, D9 B                               Standard Condominium- }3 e" A. B5 B$ P' Q- `
    -------------------------------------------------------------
% p  }5 P: H# H% F9 l! z                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo0 I- F- ~" Y. s$ E6 e8 i5 c8 U
    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change
0 a* E( n* Y4 V% B6 Q- P& r4 z    -------------------------------------------------------------
' t; b; F8 J, T0 y    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%1 H) @: c, r  T) V6 G: x
    -------------------------------------------------------------. `' N. L6 R/ z* M* @8 Z0 ?
    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%
3 b$ c1 M4 U. t# Q9 o0 ~    -------------------------------------------------------------
5 x+ F. Q0 a/ ?6 C    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A3 ~; Z. }5 k, ~% y+ e2 ]
    -------------------------------------------------------------
/ l1 S5 O5 J( t    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A: h  x$ U5 {+ K& [9 y5 Q2 `) `
    -------------------------------------------------------------1 K* T& y  s7 L& i1 o- V
    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%6 r, v; Q4 o, D' ]1 a7 K% ~( a
    -------------------------------------------------------------
; G' J' W$ x. z    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%1 C+ z4 `& B) B. ^' c' k
    -------------------------------------------------------------" h  n+ f# g, _* I. y& {
    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%2 t% m: y1 t2 k2 |
    -------------------------------------------------------------# H1 v! Y% j( o. f+ }! j6 x
    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%- [- i- ?! W. M7 g$ [8 F
    -------------------------------------------------------------% |) }- c1 f& d. o  }( B- }2 y
    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%6 R* K* J, c1 B9 I# s
    -------------------------------------------------------------
# J8 G9 j+ V5 m$ K8 t9 l4 b    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%
2 `, z' r5 o" |  [    -------------------------------------------------------------% [9 g% @* L# E0 U6 {0 K
    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%6 P1 I) B- D7 J
    -------------------------------------------------------------' L6 V2 Z) f* ]7 U* W' w
    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%1 }/ V' }: g6 @) ]& s; I
    -------------------------------------------------------------3 ^4 ?( @8 u, J: [6 l
    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%  D0 Z9 v$ b, S/ \; O. Y
    -------------------------------------------------------------" t* y- @' u1 v3 ^
    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%" `: ]9 M. y7 [" k$ I  o7 c# f3 n/ z
    -------------------------------------------------------------3 j( j# L4 F+ H4 c
    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%
, t: C) ?' L, \6 o, N7 [    -------------------------------------------------------------7 i6 ?: j: b* t1 }) q6 M3 u
    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%' Y, }1 a/ l  u0 b1 z3 R
    -------------------------------------------------------------
, x# `. g$ Q+ M6 h% t2 x+ `$ ^" ~! g; ]    >>; s' v5 ?" F) V- _

2 `  f& y& C/ z' @8 o* n    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
7 `" g6 x* F% Xin the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
1 g' o; [' \9 ]5 P2 QJohn and Victoria.
1 s5 W7 E( G, U$ \2 k1 m; l; F' y1 o7 R# [& J3 ^1 i) F, Q
    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
8 ]/ N1 ^& ]/ `0 T1 K' gcomprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of1 D; F+ D8 @; `+ i8 Y$ t
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
2 g9 ?% V" {! p6 E- ~( }* K: vreferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
7 [' w: E5 K1 ptrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities; {9 r) S% ~% @2 ]0 Y& T) u  X
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is& j; P" ?' V( ]9 W) t- m. _
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
$ }3 v* k& n4 I% }" l! k) afigures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable" P# d7 L6 D) i! _8 d: h* f! T
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on1 p7 b4 {; v4 H, @5 I- j# B
November 15, 2006.- Y( E$ Q3 h9 `$ g% W3 I% w9 d! {+ m
    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of& L# i3 a; C& |/ o( i# e4 ]
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
" r) z: G$ k3 W9 bprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is6 i. N, P7 i( i0 y- K$ ]
available for some areas back to the early 1970s.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2025-5-25 12:12 , Processed in 0.154919 second(s), 11 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表