 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
- j4 T9 x# p( n3 o* {! |& l5 z
) w& B& y" V' g w- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -# x: x7 W8 k- ]/ m% [
- q/ ?& a. Z7 a* w
TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
( E1 x1 K& S G9 k5 h( \" E/ Texhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
/ E4 F( S6 _6 g# d( _quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic& r- l$ M3 _7 _% ~0 p" C5 U$ y- ~" j
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
! L- @% K% I Q' U# w5 I& k1 Wprice gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
6 @% o. \: {" G8 d5 f9 wmore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
& ]5 i3 P. G7 r }4 p% UQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
$ u+ ?1 O& Q- P+ r0 Z% @LePage Real Estate Services./ p, C: i, X, N$ ~( e
8 [% s$ v/ G7 y+ b* v. m: j Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters" p% B; n+ m2 E& T1 W* ]/ O$ K5 N, X
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic' Z" p. ]5 c: T5 L+ M+ x
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
! U% D4 e: j1 tsound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the5 e- `- y& L& p* Q8 \1 P$ X: {
residential real estate sector.. }6 U/ ^+ M. {6 _
$ B/ t0 x9 i& @& L& I/ {: C6 m Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
/ m ^" `% P8 l; i5 z1 y3 F+ b1 K- aoccurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)) ?% q+ |5 l0 q: ]/ _; _
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,5622 @9 c/ c/ O' N
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380' {9 P- a: r+ {6 L
(+13.2%).
% v( _% f$ c6 l' h2 P
& [: z0 S0 m" \1 h "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
$ w! l; ]6 D" Bduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
" x! M7 j9 {* S ufrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
& h8 X G& ?- mpoised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,+ k: S/ C* M3 P$ P/ h! z
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.3 B/ v" u0 e; j$ L1 z* h1 u- `
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
_' [ T+ t9 \4 B6 D: Iwelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy; M! y& m7 d9 x8 c8 O4 K0 C- ~/ K) ]
balanced market."5 v! K8 G( F, z
3 N& r3 f1 y/ g! M
Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
" E, r) r' H. `7 R5 ?( r: Jconsiderable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
% P( W0 _( Q+ x: kto balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued. i0 a! r) d) v: j
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core K1 w2 i. C+ \* i6 }: h$ f$ G
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
6 e4 X+ H+ N8 j1 @' Qmanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record& W7 s% c Z& G( R# z
breaking price appreciations.
7 J, i6 I2 m# L5 p5 {4 }" [+ b5 z9 J* M0 ]! J7 ?+ g; g6 o
Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding9 F0 ?* W) y% d' B* t: V
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
) O0 I$ E9 Y" i( u! ?largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
* @: X1 |. L- n7 p% X
% a% V: T! v9 r( \7 r) g In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid2 w) a# w0 `) m. v! I: {
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
P& f M3 K1 ~0 | ?+ Rconfidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
. N6 }$ ~4 C! G* S0 V* x: R: kslightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.+ |. M' D# I" x) l" K2 H- c5 _
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
( ~% G" j$ r) ? V# Xgreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of8 Z$ J9 D) P7 \/ C! o- a* r
price appreciation when compared with 2005.
$ A0 V9 O8 ^6 G w d J5 Q' u- h M! r0 D3 q0 ~
While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing+ t- K s5 Z/ @9 P# h, c9 X I
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
, b# H+ \; Y O$ u/ F* g% kfinancial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
0 b, H! G9 b. R/ g. ?$ Q- Aare markedly different than those found in the United States. Y3 K8 q/ c; ~& L
$ ]. ]& d% K! \/ y8 s, r
Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
- F8 p# \: s5 Q+ uAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
- _( j# N% q: Mfavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the% S7 H. e# P; [
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general/ Z* |8 O% t% R% b2 Z* B; K5 c
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the2 S! r. I, h# e
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and. \# Y( N( `2 s
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization! M8 w& k7 X1 D f4 E7 C
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."& W' v3 G6 c' z- N+ |. p2 O8 e
9 n4 C6 [; k+ O2 L <<6 a# B% k4 F1 a: c
REGIONAL SUMMARIES
) {' C& Q" e! P0 U0 r8 O >>& ?* [, @# z' \; z! o
2 b$ T& ?$ m8 N: v, O) P
Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
, }5 Q4 [5 p& G! [7 kHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
5 k0 b5 u% ?6 N1 L- T5 L; J( tof price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time2 [0 L8 ~4 m) u% |1 I
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of# C# B' W. Q% f; ^: C! F/ Z# R
renovations.
) s+ ~. U3 Z( l. o! b) Y. |( r6 F( L# m4 ~
The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight% K% R( T3 \5 \# u% X8 o7 E
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation: t5 a7 x! I8 V2 Y J- n
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and, ^0 E9 S$ [& ~# T( m
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.' l, |: i0 g$ y* A% B
* A- R3 y) a, ^8 y0 `
The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer% |' ]/ r# L E3 p
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the7 _/ I! p1 J$ ]1 l/ e7 T
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new- Y+ I9 j) G+ [/ I9 d
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores$ D2 `! w! L" X# ~$ a! @
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
$ `% K [1 o1 x8 C; ?! ]and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
8 Z' F/ m1 K B; v" m
: A) Y0 \/ X8 t/ E* N6 X5 E In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
. F: O) N; ~: b5 [3 b4 Zconditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
3 \0 j2 K) x. J+ e I- _' z- Qhomes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
6 l, w3 l" D# K. d+ [& y4 dwas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian$ t2 M: F& R' u$ [ } `8 J2 j
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing! g* p2 o* n0 _. G' Y
buyers with more options when looking for a home.
: a7 N- [* G. i; M% Z3 y$ ~ o# X* I& l5 C5 Q9 o) l; `
Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly: t4 @1 ]. A( V0 `& X0 n
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
; } ]* c) V; z9 j) f J# a qpriced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
" \* P9 P6 t) C1 M! s3 N& r5 @7 eas some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last8 @7 u- c2 H( A
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
1 Q8 q+ U( B& m9 J
" x" N K; ?" B8 l Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house& j8 e4 \1 Z7 i) U
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
9 Y; p, K: d# @: T6 J: e2 glevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
( V: G7 L" N+ J/ \" `: l3 E) Ffirst-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,+ o2 h/ ?- f1 X1 ^$ H+ s3 F4 H
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the% J7 P0 m1 s+ o2 U# |7 S& T4 q
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
3 ]5 Y/ \# a4 s* ]making a purchase.$ S" t$ _ @9 _" K
( D4 u T1 L$ | D& x8 L Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing! t9 d; a$ V+ [6 ?6 k* i
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong) @* b' K# \9 y3 ^1 y
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city) y2 r: Y% G d( U2 |7 h0 Y: S
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
2 g& D9 x) z0 f3 x" uattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown1 a# I) {0 X! ~
amenities.0 k6 [$ u5 u) P. H
# Z% Z0 |+ V% t& @ The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
2 ], v* o* C. }3 P e# p) pthroughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand: \/ K# L8 ^* Y' P7 \
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
2 M/ {5 M8 A9 S( i8 Econtinued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
{- E' ]2 l/ ~/ Gdriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle: k/ `% c- O$ r7 q' B: f0 p# P
residence, rather than for investment.8 q" Z- V2 L0 `/ C
2 ^ X5 ~* w7 ~* q% y
The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
- @' y: r2 ]* d" @' R' Ehouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
% s- e4 r; G' D! Bin a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
: X# k2 _3 J/ Z, P; @# ?confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
8 f: T+ x9 f; `: Srate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
6 f; o& X5 W' t7 _the market.5 a A/ R* X6 a6 P: `
6 @- R: ]/ B+ w; h, i; H6 m1 K, l. Z In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
: @" P. t$ r) D) @ hJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
0 V, i/ e) d# p. R+ ]August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
+ B/ @- n( U, m* Tmonths, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
4 |- H2 d) g" d6 ato the shortage of available inventory.; k, K) n8 W3 p' K
+ Y1 N, O6 a' {& j+ e3 y6 x& t6 b$ T Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its9 e2 S+ n# k% [
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
# H* w' g- ?- I; V* H/ Tvibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses I/ S6 E2 Y( H' W9 q9 V4 O4 w
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
$ h+ \8 l( ~8 L# B2 b, r
) T6 B; B; k& m+ q Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases: S L7 S! W1 p8 H
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
m# b# i6 [ B2 s7 Hunemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
, B3 P, O3 ~$ I2 E+ i. @& npressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring/ | d) |+ o \/ w* L( Y( D
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer3 C! i. \9 Z4 d) Z' y
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
( ^( s8 `: _) V7 `- ?+ ?2 D" Q# N abuyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.% n( D+ _4 k( [- Q0 Q8 t6 ^
+ E+ O# G: T; }' W Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
1 X, n% g& M5 G! l/ G8 ]: i: uas activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
& s) G- ^# p# b( {# r' b4 {remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,* s* M1 G: ?4 F/ E+ x' A
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
# o- ]* Q, z- e% f D, n& |- q! Lincreasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
( t5 ]2 X2 E5 e% Q& X) Y. o0 M1 Sin the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
3 \4 H- r# ~: k7 r0 q9 Otowards the end of 2006. : ?9 Q5 L6 B, `: X4 x+ ^
3 }% m- A) a5 p; C. s! X" u8 A
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of2 S/ x. b/ p# w
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
+ T* k! [: K0 Z! d) m) uto meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse: I" w) Y+ y4 s9 y' n
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to9 d* G, y% E& L Y. [& R4 z
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
/ |- c; Q& Y A+ g1 D: ^% _ L2 Ipressure on tight inventory levels.
9 \7 O6 ]$ ^" G- c0 z% I3 \' X. u5 M: z- D
Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
' k4 I: I- ~( l( l. K. o, Yfundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
, k" {! D, |/ s- g+ W" m$ \" S8 Pinto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;3 i r3 k' z7 c4 \0 a6 o1 c
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching1 X o! |3 ~0 P( R: y
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace. \/ x3 q$ B; I+ ~4 W2 O* m1 l1 E
: r2 ^0 G7 Q5 D- c( Q# r9 M <<
9 `/ V) }. ?5 N& y. L( N/ i, h/ t* Z Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006, |- f8 ^) L: b/ s$ r" O" @
6 x- z" M% c; X7 j' c- _6 n
-------------------------------------------------------------------------. `8 t1 l$ Y6 y7 r
Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey
, U: {7 g. P4 }' ?% q* K) L# q -------------------------------------------------------------------------. z# W4 h, I+ e% g
2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3
, m" A" ~! ]9 A1 D( E Market Average Average % Change Average Average
! |- A! W. s( U -------------------------------------------------------------------------
. [4 ~! {! D2 \; r, T Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,0002 j; l$ P4 [0 N: n' {& ?" p+ U9 D
-------------------------------------------------------------------------5 s' \0 @# V: y! @# @. ^
Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000( T8 F7 n+ l6 K& i: r* M9 ]- x: q" M
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
5 s5 n! b* R! z$ E" T Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000
: D9 R; ?& r0 s* k3 q2 n -------------------------------------------------------------------------, T( M; m: n5 v0 `# Z7 }& t j0 w/ G
Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -
$ o( S3 k( M6 o -------------------------------------------------------------------------! W) s* }+ E# R( u
St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,3331 o( ~+ f# G0 k* b" U# a
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
" D) o8 U6 l' B7 [" q. Z9 S" @ Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583
4 k6 T* J; K K' B -------------------------------------------------------------------------
" K. O5 s- j; x/ P' r. X Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185
1 w. a) x! s- e! p9 i9 s -------------------------------------------------------------------------4 Y4 ]8 w. f- E$ [1 Z
Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250" b/ o3 x+ M! `2 [ J/ O
-------------------------------------------------------------------------0 H6 ]9 A& C3 j3 U& h
Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766
6 l4 Y6 Y5 }* ^7 x0 M3 A -------------------------------------------------------------------------
5 m/ i) e0 I8 `3 }% a: W0 V8 B. | Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,7070 M7 i0 q) e* W
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
% ^/ x% Q& {$ u" h Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500$ h& g( @/ `1 r/ U5 l8 Q- j
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 p5 i! ]- Y0 z4 V# T Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389* R8 R# i2 P2 l/ X. H$ p
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ S5 h7 X+ X+ V7 z% L Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714' d6 e9 h& W$ q4 m9 [: n0 v( L
-------------------------------------------------------------------------8 y; V' r. C/ Y% g o" ]2 o
Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500$ T2 H' @' ^# b- } `0 g: g1 u
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
/ E; J2 t9 @6 O. k5 g: k0 k" j: k+ Q Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000
, ]2 g6 @+ x5 G, W% z3 Q$ g4 t -------------------------------------------------------------------------2 e1 p3 h7 I* N$ |. q0 P% N0 g9 O
National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860
4 m; f1 b, @3 u, f -------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 U& r* r) \* S" N& M, V
5 V; N% V, i; m" [" e -------------------------------------------------------------9 e' p2 _7 k5 N- G+ w
Standard Condominium
4 f1 g! c8 W- v -------------------------------------------------------------! Q% D! L Z$ {/ t; U; N
2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo0 c% p) I4 [9 ~3 h2 |: s% k
Market % Change Average Average % Change% R" M3 w0 h4 z) ?
-------------------------------------------------------------
& V3 }8 V. e" n Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%
2 ?7 `/ _: x0 y7 K0 g -------------------------------------------------------------8 ^7 e( j. W2 N9 Z4 o* J7 }
Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%: @8 J# d$ j5 U
-------------------------------------------------------------
" ]" S2 t, k1 |0 z Moncton 4.9% - - N/A5 t( T. T* q0 E- m$ V3 t; y4 j
-------------------------------------------------------------" D1 s4 x% S; S6 E
Saint John N/A - - N/A$ C* @. d# c4 f, D! U" ^
-------------------------------------------------------------1 g( Q4 S. o/ E( r7 G
St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%
$ C1 L# K$ Y# f+ D -------------------------------------------------------------- D3 z) G+ D! e2 i3 F4 {: Y* d8 k
Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%! q7 [* b7 [; {7 l# E* Z- A6 e, ?
-------------------------------------------------------------
1 U* Q' s; z# h Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%( g* n8 ?1 M& K
-------------------------------------------------------------
. Z( w* t. L( v! J0 j Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%
1 e' Y3 J- O) J -------------------------------------------------------------# [# U9 @7 j0 @( m- B0 y' ^
Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%/ q3 R* O( H- {
-------------------------------------------------------------$ n. N! ?( _+ i; |7 V$ X
Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%
/ Y- f" }0 x: C -------------------------------------------------------------$ g- A# p q1 c
Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%, r+ {' E3 T7 Y% ] {
-------------------------------------------------------------3 u+ s+ h$ \+ S1 X/ _( `+ j& [
Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%# r9 Z7 r% F6 F' ~9 D
-------------------------------------------------------------
; G& ]# O1 ]% t9 O# @$ G( A- Y/ o) b Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%$ p# w( }0 |8 q
-------------------------------------------------------------4 l2 M; W! r' }5 ^, p' t
Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%" j x) B, t4 ^( l- `. S
-------------------------------------------------------------% ]7 R( G8 X+ G
Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%' G5 b/ m) p+ w' t7 s
-------------------------------------------------------------0 Y) c0 {1 O. q# D
National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%0 z8 @* N5 D3 y$ ?+ W
-------------------------------------------------------------
8 P* b t1 M$ L# b% E >>
1 d- k' Q" {# S3 i, I1 i% {' d6 ?5 e( I1 K
Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined& u# i; w$ A* n$ d
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
$ W3 m/ g9 e3 Z/ lJohn and Victoria.3 `, b8 b$ q& r' `6 F
# _ w" g2 F! D. d z# V The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
& l4 ]0 W" F# W. f; y# e$ {comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
3 Q, z4 Q! r& t" E- u7 M6 o: V+ }housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
8 n& I/ r1 j* e/ p0 k# O. r5 W2 oreferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
7 f! X6 i- \8 p( s5 ftrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
' ~' T1 e; `0 K7 ?8 \+ x9 Hacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is P; \" U' b- x9 Q) w" }1 U1 r% U% K& d
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
% n+ J& p# e) e* ?4 efigures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable6 g! n# H/ I3 h2 {6 K
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
9 M* M$ @* d9 f6 q' w" |* V5 XNovember 15, 2006., ~9 M8 R( O6 ?7 X- L/ p
Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
# \0 S6 i( S* D- H( X' P" b5 nfair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge8 K f# }( n$ t# H* [
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is8 C, r* L+ p3 W* m; k1 q9 u
available for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|