 鲜花( 5)  鸡蛋( 0)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2014-2-24 10:13
|
显示全部楼层
本帖最后由 爱逛公园 于 2014-2-24 10:16 编辑 1 E. R3 Z. \: O' {& [3 ^
4 d! x; o9 s/ R3 I( k1 }$ I' K
我不懂,不过我的理据是基于简单的数学。假如我没有以前剩下的10,000额度,我2013年收到的Notice of Asseement 就会是:: a. D6 K; K! O
9 `( _, ]) m5 w' W3 G5 \7 m9 ]
9 @' X) i! N% K& {5 O! n; w# c8 ~8 z+ `8 {0 m
S4 m, w# y) j( b/ E4 L. X! e* o6 H& i. X( ]
(1) RRSP deduction limit for 2012 $0
5 q- T( n: ~; U& a(2) Minus: Allowable RRSP contributions deducted for 2012 $0
2 V8 |7 d5 [! G, ]0 v-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------# b- @, H2 k: D F$ j: a2 u' v
(3) Unused RRSP deduction limit at the end of 2012 $07 U5 w: R" g6 U; q) Z+ N
8 M9 ~8 g3 F2 g' J. \' }
(4) Plus: 18% of 2012 earned income of $5,000
9 @7 g3 p0 ~6 }' t5 {0 q(5) Minus: 2012 pension adjustment $4,000 $1,000
% \) t* [1 t( x7 o$ @ a$ @-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% g/ e' ?& C7 E(6) $1,000" N7 V, A1 D$ U) y( e& M# o
Minus: 2013 net past service pension adjustment $0+ e4 ?9 {5 t- N
Plus: 2013 pension adjustment reversal $0
9 r' F6 {; v2 C-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
, _2 V! O5 O$ G4 @& m! UYour RRSP deduction limit for 2013 $1,000
. R/ _5 \* R7 j) k% e) v) p$ \# d6 g! m; G! ?, T/ Z) O+ ~! Y9 G
假如我2013年有 -$ c8 R( D% [% Y3 d8 w, u
18% of 2013 earned income of $6,000
, w3 s: f* W9 YMinus: 2013 pension adjustment $5,000
: X+ }4 q) Z, V9 [% N
t! K) O- q% x- l* {8 S象你所说的,难道我要1,000 - 5,000 = - 4,000, 我还欠政府的?pension adjustment 已经在(line #5) 已经减了,同一税项怎么会在同一张表中出现两次。所以我认为不需要再减去pension adjustment。请你解释一下。: C8 y) a$ J$ G
* `2 E1 u+ p: T& r如果有人家里也有pension 的,也请提我解解疑。谢谢。 |
|