 鲜花( 21)  鸡蛋( 0)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2010-10-5 20:41
|
显示全部楼层
正好刚看到一个类似的问题在别的英文论坛:
# s& c B5 X/ S$ A
4 v7 A/ R0 |7 R+ h3 u$ g- @( G0 w, \F4 IS Vs. F2.8 non IS, 贴过来大家都评论评论。
% N' N8 O, j6 j" e
# d0 S3 T; Z+ Q; p# T8 L$ n**********************************# Q2 b% v+ | b- O
Anyhow, you pose a good question - f/4 IS or f/2.8 non IS. Here are the main points:
; |* g$ v! A- K6 D N9 d! P! O' o( f/ F5 L
1) The f/2.8 gives you one extra stop of hand-holding possibility, but at the cost of depth of field, whereas the 4.0 gives you 3 stops of hand-holding possibility at any aperture. Winner: f/4., p+ T$ H4 w. Y
! z" A# ~/ D* G: I2) The f/2.8 gives you one extra stop of light in darkened conditions when photographing moving subjects. The f/4 doesn't. Winner: f/2.8.
) }( Q0 N2 s0 h) P+ o5 h! _% ]0 u+ F+ r6 L
3) The f/4 is lighter and smaller. Winner f/4.
3 ^% P& U% u: L+ P+ A& W1 J; P. x: T
4) The wider aperture of the f/2.8 can offer more creative possibilities, especially when taking portraits. Winner: f/2.8., X# ]! y. l5 N
# }7 W2 L8 b" T
5) The f/2.8 has better bokeh (creaminess of the blurred areas). Winner: f/2.8. |
|