 鲜花( 21)  鸡蛋( 0)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2010-10-5 20:41
|
显示全部楼层
正好刚看到一个类似的问题在别的英文论坛:
: S( M5 C0 H! N+ X$ b* x9 m& }1 O/ w a& w) @) M* `* x# k, ?3 M6 F
F4 IS Vs. F2.8 non IS, 贴过来大家都评论评论。
* n+ A5 K" i0 ]7 k, y" ~; [
! a) w0 p, h- M* K**********************************
- F! T2 h3 w, JAnyhow, you pose a good question - f/4 IS or f/2.8 non IS. Here are the main points:
# J- i; _& A! K* m- [& Y: t) \) C9 \4 q$ Q
1) The f/2.8 gives you one extra stop of hand-holding possibility, but at the cost of depth of field, whereas the 4.0 gives you 3 stops of hand-holding possibility at any aperture. Winner: f/4.' _, Q5 V& d. |. G! K$ i3 ?
9 `1 s; S2 s: K( d! W8 F& t
2) The f/2.8 gives you one extra stop of light in darkened conditions when photographing moving subjects. The f/4 doesn't. Winner: f/2.8.6 v; ~3 F6 Z- V6 j7 j$ e; Z/ W
/ E! P% c: g8 E. ?; n% `0 K D J0 T
3) The f/4 is lighter and smaller. Winner f/4.
) q. X7 l* @) e7 |+ \) S6 m6 m/ ]7 a8 ~, Y4 ?* }
4) The wider aperture of the f/2.8 can offer more creative possibilities, especially when taking portraits. Winner: f/2.8.
" x$ I" m* \: ^) W' k2 s9 I; U9 |5 g1 V' E ^8 o
5) The f/2.8 has better bokeh (creaminess of the blurred areas). Winner: f/2.8. |
|