埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 1887|回复: 2

TD Bank:OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-4-8 15:01 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly$ b& _% M9 K; w' X% M
from 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove; L5 o1 R0 j; J, v% c$ v- @) T  t
unsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house& E* Z: \6 e: N3 ]
prices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by' h- a7 L1 h( a3 K' V
fundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This/ z! U8 ?; s$ [8 K: Y4 O$ Q
overpricing compelled a level of residential construction
! X9 u& F& n3 [4 D, G* L2 q9 M6 lthat exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately
) b+ G3 w* Q# u12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past, ^# p* x- [: R' o* j
three years.
: j$ ?* f; ?: i' x3 z+ rBy “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from* U  k, l4 ]6 e# K  S
their fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of
4 ]8 i& [/ d* ]( L$ yaffordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects# A  ?" A/ u# o% R+ u. P9 k
both a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices1 s2 P$ k5 O, z& U
to fundamentally justified levels.
  g3 b; U. J  z8 g+ oWe consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”
- K4 [7 e! k0 h) ?where homebuyers buy up too many houses and3 s3 P* d) C, U4 B- q& A3 r
that this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”
4 K! _! l7 v! T. c+ Bwhere builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although; q  A% O, `: O, y( k4 ^; z( S
there is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s/ C1 y# _; J& m2 S
“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where
5 `9 R& N# V1 ~; Lhomebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch+ ?4 z, @% ~& S) R( y3 _1 a3 i
that is now being rapidly reined in.
# e- V& E/ X- i9 QWhile most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,; e: ]4 e$ f! ^$ F4 Z
the construction of too many new homes over the boom7 q, Y* c3 m, k- _7 x4 U$ \; a6 {
means a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh- c) M+ J5 V" R7 A) ^2 @
on markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers0 g/ O+ V9 X( w$ u$ P
from the cyclical downturn, house price growth will
1 ^3 ^: q" c- K  S# ?9 e/ c6 Wremain choppy and new residential construction will be7 e) `- {) d+ i  ~" G4 m& z1 K
dampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction) I8 K6 H5 p% A$ ~' f
is now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this
" J( A" f: L& M5 n: Yto persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide4 j* f* A$ `. C5 D7 z
residential construction will fall further to around
: p6 |$ e3 G: t& |$ z125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units
1 Y$ i8 N4 C& V) n# I/ a5 B% Nin the fourth quarter.8 v% Z- u. g* j$ V
To quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,
1 [9 J. i: T  ]* ~we first develop an empirical model, based on long-run
8 E. h* ?/ e" n! ufundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each
3 i4 C# j, r7 B. {province. Affordability is the key concept behind home- P( c0 Q8 h' T" I5 P  P
values since house prices should track incomes over the
* o+ \0 M8 [9 k" clong-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we% \) x) l  }( O2 \5 i) L$ M
regard housing prices and household formation as the drivers
' C& r" f: O" v2 Y# l3 ^1 z% l: lof residential construction.8 M  h# f  u& B
To examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a
6 f8 s6 i- v4 b# k; Q“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction
* [- ?0 ^& w# H* u7 ]would have occurred if housing had been priced
9 w9 z$ |2 X% s+ r* Foptimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this) _  d% R; p% i* F/ p
fundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new
  I4 t, u, F0 B# w' Punits were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too4 H1 k4 o, P7 w: I9 X2 g7 @, @7 p
many houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.8 M5 w( k# V/ o- \/ e
Regionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,, Q1 U: L+ E4 o/ |
where housing demand will further contract under waning. L, z) M  D! p# `8 A" g+ j! s
population inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are
& n# _: r' C2 Q' I0 M2 M, Kalready witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the
. D5 J) ?; g2 m: Qvery time that the resale market has swung into strong% ?0 C9 f$ T& [6 ?; t
buyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces) t+ O' C8 K. ]7 i6 j
has been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural0 b: E3 P+ a0 d; E0 D& i! u& p
weakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.0 R# t4 y+ ]* H+ Z
Québec shows signs of strain – especially given the
' f/ X' C0 u/ Ustrange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de
$ s9 J+ l& }) R7 m* UMontréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,' @  E2 ]: M, z, `
given the province’s history of under-building and low ownership
# ~; E) \  I8 N* j/ D" xrates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a/ Q( ~# I1 O9 h& p& C: \* A. W
cyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears
7 E5 E0 D5 r# v% H: v6 S1 Climited – with the important exception of the Toronto9 M0 o4 x9 }" n# [( e- l4 T
condo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically' @8 O( v6 [" s) M6 C: Y0 A
high levels of apartment-style units presently under# C* N: x5 d* ?) R1 K0 q
construction mean that record numbers of condos will
& ~9 I6 N7 d" g$ x1 areach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as
! n( C. f3 z. Ycyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could
( e/ x  P9 N9 Y+ C2 q. t* s- \spike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while2 l% h8 f+ b/ t" S1 Z% S
residential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we
4 p  M( k2 x- tanticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from
- w# Q' ]% U- Dinter-provincial and international migration over the coming
* S9 s1 x9 @7 _years, which, along with improvements in affordability,4 U7 x  ~, q$ J0 F, D. ]: |
will alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.% F9 }& I5 B! G+ j
OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING- l6 w% K& ~6 L: x6 X" k& {( K
MARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS! i# H: v1 R( G& _* |8 G! X& O
Grant Bishop, Economist
8 C9 _( w. Y- F% J0 X8 H  _! `" ?/ p416-982-80632 t% }; f! K7 Q0 B
Pascal Gauthier, Economist+ g+ s' E" K. k4 Z8 q" Y& o
416-944-5730" |9 V. C4 ?' f9 N9 y

: V. a1 v6 ^* E+ H$ ^8 ohttp://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf
鲜花(52) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-4-8 20:39 | 显示全部楼层
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-5-6 12:57 , Processed in 0.125121 second(s), 12 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表