埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2187|回复: 2

[其他] Dow化工亚省工厂将裁员

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-2-4 13:59 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
道化工亚省工厂将裁员& Z1 l, [, q* \8 i! v( B. p9 |5 ~; v( R
Dow Chemical's Alberta facilities will see layoffs
  Q, N. X6 c1 Z0 }7 Q" Y- ^: [% M' A7 m
EDMONTON — Some employees at Dow Chemical’s Alberta facilities have been notified they will be laid off but the full extent of the job cuts won’t be known until late next week, a company spokesperson said Wednesday.
0 T+ [+ K( ^8 e9 {4 h
' _- j5 n- m$ r+ |; T; HMary-Lea Crawford, public affairs manager for Dow at Fort Saskatchewan, would not say how many layoff notices have been handed out so far. 5 R* o( n: X6 e  f& l) i

; z# Q: K3 Q; J5 aThe cuts are not expected to be as deep as the 11-per-cent target announced by the U.S.-based company in December, she said.
9 A: `9 U& _: n5 _' D3 L( r' T5 A: D) C* z" N+ G
Dow employs about 630 people in Alberta, with 550 in Fort Saskatchewan with the balance at its Prentiss facility near Red Deer.7 z1 P+ C6 l6 J; i4 d3 `2 x

3 |! X! f; V: e5 b* CDow posted weaker-than-expected fourth-quarter results on Tuesday because demand has plummeted in markets such as the construction, electronics and automotives.
4 d) C0 R& _* L) E$ M3 l
" Z% m, x) }5 G7 |$ F! _( o" @Dow has tried to revamp its earnings profile over the past two years, first by announcing plans to sell a 50- per-cent stake in its cyclical basic plastics business to Kuwaiti investors for more than $9 billion. Then, in July, it announced plans to spend more than $15 billion to acquire Rohm and Haas using proceeds from the joint venture.( J; g" v# s) t" E- ^4 C, x& [

2 T. r. l8 r* w  H' V- x1 q6 ?/ nDow’s plans faltered when Kuwait backed out of the joint venture. Rohm and Haas said its merger agreement with Dow, was not contingent on the Kuwait transaction.7 \( O( J8 E4 o
7 K( o! y$ ~9 j; |; L' d
Philadelphia-based Rohm and Haas sued Dow in a bid to force the deal to close. Dow filed its response to the lawsuit on Tuesday.( R+ I; m* N& b% P) U

  E. f0 O) p! ?! cDow argued the agreement was not binding, because it was impossible to carry out “without jeopardizing the very existence of both companies.”
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-2-4 14:03 | 显示全部楼层
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-2-4 14:57 | 显示全部楼层
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-3-23 22:45 , Processed in 0.104556 second(s), 14 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表