 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
道化工亚省工厂将裁员
- ~' _1 o! n" m. MDow Chemical's Alberta facilities will see layoffs
8 Y9 M1 j% E; p+ y' l0 {# \2 N. p& J+ \- A" c/ W
EDMONTON — Some employees at Dow Chemical’s Alberta facilities have been notified they will be laid off but the full extent of the job cuts won’t be known until late next week, a company spokesperson said Wednesday.
7 q- w2 Q3 M; x9 K( F; `+ t/ m7 a
/ B+ p: j( R6 a/ \2 U! H" `Mary-Lea Crawford, public affairs manager for Dow at Fort Saskatchewan, would not say how many layoff notices have been handed out so far. : M( L$ r1 q& O! C& g5 g
1 z3 \6 ^9 |- I4 ~2 V) ]
The cuts are not expected to be as deep as the 11-per-cent target announced by the U.S.-based company in December, she said.
Y! ?9 Y9 g8 x' U6 D$ E$ M: T: j3 e$ H' T7 [8 h8 `
Dow employs about 630 people in Alberta, with 550 in Fort Saskatchewan with the balance at its Prentiss facility near Red Deer.
0 H7 y" O* }/ X$ s. K
D ?& @. G9 x+ x; oDow posted weaker-than-expected fourth-quarter results on Tuesday because demand has plummeted in markets such as the construction, electronics and automotives.0 F7 o( o8 R- j$ H
6 k" Z- q% ], g; G) A1 f- K' SDow has tried to revamp its earnings profile over the past two years, first by announcing plans to sell a 50- per-cent stake in its cyclical basic plastics business to Kuwaiti investors for more than $9 billion. Then, in July, it announced plans to spend more than $15 billion to acquire Rohm and Haas using proceeds from the joint venture. q6 w/ U1 _6 U, H1 f% P& k
/ E+ v/ w- F2 ?4 X) lDow’s plans faltered when Kuwait backed out of the joint venture. Rohm and Haas said its merger agreement with Dow, was not contingent on the Kuwait transaction.
. H( u# v; s. w; v% z0 U, A
p9 `3 X) L# ~' SPhiladelphia-based Rohm and Haas sued Dow in a bid to force the deal to close. Dow filed its response to the lawsuit on Tuesday.0 D ^( u, G3 \ v4 Z
, m' C5 J0 B$ U0 g$ ^- v" @
Dow argued the agreement was not binding, because it was impossible to carry out “without jeopardizing the very existence of both companies.” |
|