  鲜花( 0)   鸡蛋( 0)  
 | 
 
道化工亚省工厂将裁员+ F* |5 P, Q: a: o8 x 
Dow Chemical's Alberta facilities will see layoffs 
: P8 V, g2 m' M% D* z# }" }) K  _; E) p& U# T 
EDMONTON — Some employees at Dow Chemical’s Alberta facilities have been notified they will be laid off but the full extent of the job cuts won’t be known until late next week, a company spokesperson said Wednesday.2 n, h* Q$ R' h( s' N& A 
 
8 _% \, E: P7 e+ u9 _Mary-Lea Crawford, public affairs manager for Dow at Fort Saskatchewan, would not say how many layoff notices have been handed out so far. - P( R* P2 X: S) R/ o1 I* }# |: f+ f 
5 a( C) ?  f+ K* c 
The cuts are not expected to be as deep as the 11-per-cent target announced by the U.S.-based company in December, she said.4 u2 n4 d; @7 |; e2 L1 ^' w$ e/ E# e 
- n: i* U. H5 v* [% I% Z2 D7 l 
Dow employs about 630 people in Alberta, with 550 in Fort Saskatchewan with the balance at its Prentiss facility near Red Deer.8 ~" {/ @: a: y 
 
) ~0 v  ?, U3 O3 ]. }8 ~7 @Dow posted weaker-than-expected fourth-quarter results on Tuesday because demand has plummeted in markets such as the construction, electronics and automotives. 
1 ?* a2 Z$ |. ~, I) R+ ]( c1 U) P+ p( p 
Dow has tried to revamp its earnings profile over the past two years, first by announcing plans to sell a 50- per-cent stake in its cyclical basic plastics business to Kuwaiti investors for more than $9 billion. Then, in July, it announced plans to spend more than $15 billion to acquire Rohm and Haas using proceeds from the joint venture. 
4 V! c' ~+ Z1 q, E( c1 e! s* p$ S- E6 e' r& a% A, m 
Dow’s plans faltered when Kuwait backed out of the joint venture. Rohm and Haas said its merger agreement with Dow, was not contingent on the Kuwait transaction.( K! |$ _: z/ _, l- l" \' k 
 
: ?) v, Y1 r1 u% w% ?8 C3 U3 {Philadelphia-based Rohm and Haas sued Dow in a bid to force the deal to close. Dow filed its response to the lawsuit on Tuesday.6 l/ d" U1 o1 m2 Q; E" Z 
 
) E( J$ g' d7 P7 X- rDow argued the agreement was not binding, because it was impossible to carry out “without jeopardizing the very existence of both companies.” |   
 
 
 
 |