 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 - ?0 w9 L) |; ^1 i# {
楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!
% r- E. _+ V' W3 ^8 J+ f3 n3 x) Bcorolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ... 4 C- }0 S% c8 P' q) t8 V
' _: _$ F. {6 {* Q7 S1 f您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。
1 p4 l( E) f- o5 ^0 u* X0 i* @! k: V0 K: k
安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless." F. T6 I# v5 y! p }; C" j( T
( l! v* C3 U) Y6 w不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?
2 Q& }/ k% a) u
& q* e, C6 W- x- E1 D另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。
( q4 X, W9 a8 n3 |$ V, {0 L5 h% @" c
关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):/ A& I: d: o: z7 E2 @! f% J
Yes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.- q! g0 V+ w( T1 a
# C5 L" _" o# X/ O7 g
Or maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car"." a9 F6 ] d( [" v) U& K+ X
3 V& Q. x& J0 ?
But it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.4 A. o0 D# C: ^$ I# O5 X
+ M4 F0 ^/ s$ X# _+ h+ G. Y
[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|