 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 , v$ l! \3 b# ^6 ~- M% W
楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!
( n( h8 u9 y) |2 @( d" Bcorolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ... ! U( V; i' C+ ~. i- c( q. Z7 T m
7 E( K7 p3 }# u$ R/ x! o' a您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。* K6 ?/ R$ e: h- i- e) e. [. Z5 v
6 w% ?2 Y, l+ K: K7 n. |9 o安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.
& Z) _' N8 T% c$ b" A2 i& D, V# ]+ b+ S3 G) }, K5 f: i
不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?0 S4 X) h/ v+ e- a# R3 j; l1 K
. _. {7 ?3 D4 |8 ~, E! i另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。
6 i( Y) q& j" B. W5 N7 w7 w! x+ A* u2 z; V; c
关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):
a6 w( J; o. m8 k5 SYes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.
# p7 M4 h% t8 D; J( l: t D5 _6 w" L9 g/ k
Or maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".0 {/ P0 D+ T" e7 i2 t( {
! A0 p g* ^; I$ |7 y0 {
But it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.
7 p: r/ b6 I7 b% r, t& |. f) m+ f8 R1 f2 t2 f3 _: Z5 w2 r5 G* p6 ?
[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|