 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 
/ ~( @2 a9 Y+ }# D. h& j0 M楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!4 \1 b0 ^1 X8 w9 t3 l8 Y Y) ?
corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ... ) | ?- R) W6 @
0 _# j, N# R7 V1 L您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。) | @% A6 h* }
2 @* t6 l. ~5 ?
安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.* ?0 a7 p/ ]; {' U& s+ b. g
7 c8 _. w! k* y, D/ O8 a
不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?
6 D; |3 |! t% u0 Q0 N( f4 ` p, Q
另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。
# ?) R1 Z: |8 ?+ k( \) g% U
* j2 r, g4 }# i7 e! G3 d关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):: ^/ f5 t/ K" f# t m+ Y) w/ |% N
Yes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.4 R4 d, B& E" S$ f; e
; Q i& {. ?/ u1 p
Or maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".; r/ k! R: u; Y) o2 e" h
, g, \. s9 i, i7 c+ X0 R2 hBut it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.
0 H/ }/ D1 H5 }' h- G! r) V* ]/ D( V7 l( `) H1 V
[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|