 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 0 A& h2 \5 ^: m$ X6 O x: U9 D
楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!6 b8 H/ ^* g$ C) G I8 F# S
corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ... 6 y4 P0 v" K! X& D
: P7 P2 V2 n5 m7 m' l z/ _" u您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。
' c: A( L! Y7 c8 j/ D2 w5 k' n% M1 g( G9 B& g
安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.; I j! Y0 o- u1 k3 @: G
% J1 Q. J9 b. F' R
不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?! c9 w' \& ~$ ]; T1 s% {1 K3 A: X
8 O7 I$ i$ k O' r/ a+ d- v3 g
另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。5 p9 `& |6 s' ]3 S
9 P/ ]& W8 P& M/ w关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):
`# d8 x$ D& J$ c# g0 j) oYes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.
2 k) o& x! {; ]) E
8 n2 I5 h# W% ^, u& G# WOr maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".
3 K# R& H2 ~) @: \2 d! C2 M0 e6 e" L) Y" ~. ~6 M: R0 c; `
But it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.
- ^- B8 E0 N- q) e1 j% T) e" n8 m
% k0 \2 ~$ `& d' ^[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|