 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 1 u$ D" e# T$ r; T
楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!
6 s5 e3 U: f. Y2 Z; `# V; e* J& `4 ccorolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ...
, l1 } ?) D4 f
: Z. k- ^% D+ ~# k6 x: ~; O: G4 }4 b您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。6 g; D8 Z3 P. C, O( s( x& y' L
: K& O8 P3 {$ c; W安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.
! V5 U, h- j6 ^3 u. D9 Y7 C9 L( `) ~, e- o/ x
不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?
2 O, m2 U9 X7 i3 K7 {
9 N$ R6 y6 L' l2 c9 Y1 n: T8 D另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。, D) }/ ]/ N9 o. b9 F r
1 G0 A& i9 A' P+ J2 Q6 \关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):
4 O" ? z4 C/ oYes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers./ w( l% v8 E, g3 p
. k1 P' k1 p7 n" t u2 O
Or maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".+ V9 O. ?1 ~7 O: |! v2 Y$ g
$ z( G% r% O+ `
But it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.
2 }2 L# w2 f$ ]8 u) C+ V2 Z3 S0 r' [& m0 e2 [
[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|