Is there a house bubble in Edmonton?

smalltown

How to figure a home's fundamental value
Leamer says he can tell because homes, just like stocks, have a price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) that he believes determines their fundamental value. The “earnings” part of the ratio consists of the annual rent the house could command. Homebuyers can compare current P/Es with historical levels, Leamer says, to get some idea of whether houses in their cities are becoming overvalued.
  l  C1 i3 ?5 \$ c( S/ `: R6 K9 ~
Not everyone buys the idea that P/Es dictate value. But investors who completely ignore P/Es do so at their peril, as many have learned in recent years. Leamer, who heads the prestigious Anderson Forecast at the University of California in Los Angeles, points out that the P/E for the Standard & Poor’s 500, a key stock benchmark, was nearly double its previous historical high when the stock market bubble burst in 2000. When home P/Es peaked in California, Boston, Dallas and other markets in the mid-1980s, devastating real estate recessions followed.

Leamer didn’t invent the concept of P/Es for homes. But his willingness to proclaim bubbles in several of the nation’s hottest markets has brought him lots of attention recently.

: P1 f4 K- w, D2 m$ yTo calculate P/Es for entire cities, Leamer divided the median home price in each by the annual rent for a two-bedroom unit in each city -- and looked at P/Es each year since 1988. Here’s what he found:
) S- l/ O. g: y$ N$ L

, N/ e! J. \+ Z) U  ^2 ]' w/ ZIn Boston, the residential real estate market’s P/E recently topped 30 -- compared with just under 20 in 1988.

! f9 ~( T# A/ V4 K1 RSan Francisco’s previous peak of 25.6 in 1989 has been eclipsed, with the P/E currently at just over 27.
8 K; O' d& T6 F& tSan Diego’s current P/E is nearly 30, compared with a 1989 high of 23.4.
New York, by contrast, is actually well below previous peaks. The area’s current 22.5 P/E is above its recent nadir of 17.6 in 1993, but down from 28.6 in 1988.
% n" @  c7 n/ |2 D7 |% Z, {: O# k+ OYou don’t have to know exact P/Es, however, to spot signs of trouble, Leamer says. Any time there’s a disconnect between prices and the underlying value of homes, as measured by their market rents, there’s the potential for a bubble.
$ ?. p( C' m8 n0 v) m
If home prices are rising much faster than rents, as is true in Los Angeles, that’s a strong indication a bubble is forming.

If home prices are rising while average rents are falling -- which is the situation in San Francisco -- the bubble is pretty much unmistakable.

Home P/E ratios for 9 metro areas
Avg. 1988-2000 2001
8 [( M- k! H% w: ^Boston  20.5 30.2
; \& T) g& ]! D9 M4 _San Diego  22.8 29.7
) l6 G' i2 z0 ?$ ^San Francisco  23.8 27.2
Los Angeles  21.3 25.6
Seattle  20.4 25
Denver  17.7 23.7
" a& S. F3 t5 s1 sNew York  21.2 22.5
Chicago  17.2 20.8
, [6 }. q4 \$ p# @Washington, D.C.  17.1 20.4


) p, f$ C$ ~% I/ \/ c
It's difficult to compare P/Es from one city with those from another. P/Es in Atlantic City, N.J., have wavered between 17.3 and 11.6 since 1988; in San Diego, P/Es have not dropped below 20. But you can look on the P/E as a measure of risk -- that is, the higher the P/E is above its average level, the greater the risk, no matter where you live.
: B2 J7 y7 U4 z

From: http://moneycentral.msn.com/cont ... ingguide/P37631.asp

CANDYMAN

Who has the P/E for Edmonton for the last 20 years, please post it here.

it would be a good reference.
' U9 D8 s9 m# u5 q1 k
7 |+ s% }) e6 T& i. `* zthanks

醉酒当歌

20% buble at least. And it can take 3-5 years to digest the bubble if not burst.
7 I+ H' ?9 a: O, A2 P, W  A  ~
[ 本帖最后由 醉酒当歌 于 2007-1-14 16:41 编辑 ]