Is there a house bubble in Edmonton?

smalltown

How to figure a home's fundamental value
" ?8 P/ `) O1 q! P- jLeamer says he can tell because homes, just like stocks, have a price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) that he believes determines their fundamental value. The “earnings” part of the ratio consists of the annual rent the house could command. Homebuyers can compare current P/Es with historical levels, Leamer says, to get some idea of whether houses in their cities are becoming overvalued.

Not everyone buys the idea that P/Es dictate value. But investors who completely ignore P/Es do so at their peril, as many have learned in recent years. Leamer, who heads the prestigious Anderson Forecast at the University of California in Los Angeles, points out that the P/E for the Standard & Poor’s 500, a key stock benchmark, was nearly double its previous historical high when the stock market bubble burst in 2000. When home P/Es peaked in California, Boston, Dallas and other markets in the mid-1980s, devastating real estate recessions followed.
" Q9 W) q. G9 n' C
+ U: w  S( e. x8 F1 W2 l# ~- Z/ ]Leamer didn’t invent the concept of P/Es for homes. But his willingness to proclaim bubbles in several of the nation’s hottest markets has brought him lots of attention recently.
! s% _7 v% l6 {  q
To calculate P/Es for entire cities, Leamer divided the median home price in each by the annual rent for a two-bedroom unit in each city -- and looked at P/Es each year since 1988. Here’s what he found:


In Boston, the residential real estate market’s P/E recently topped 30 -- compared with just under 20 in 1988.
/ o9 m& N+ B' d& M0 S
San Francisco’s previous peak of 25.6 in 1989 has been eclipsed, with the P/E currently at just over 27.
2 |+ P/ o6 y( p' d% w' C* r. A9 Y" u% f: u( QSan Diego’s current P/E is nearly 30, compared with a 1989 high of 23.4.
" x: c9 y# j/ a& s! jNew York, by contrast, is actually well below previous peaks. The area’s current 22.5 P/E is above its recent nadir of 17.6 in 1993, but down from 28.6 in 1988.
You don’t have to know exact P/Es, however, to spot signs of trouble, Leamer says. Any time there’s a disconnect between prices and the underlying value of homes, as measured by their market rents, there’s the potential for a bubble.
* t$ a& f$ g( ^+ F: m5 C
If home prices are rising much faster than rents, as is true in Los Angeles, that’s a strong indication a bubble is forming.
7 ^0 s5 U. z' p- n+ X- R- ~; u
3 @+ o+ y& W, k9 VIf home prices are rising while average rents are falling -- which is the situation in San Francisco -- the bubble is pretty much unmistakable.

Home P/E ratios for 9 metro areas
Avg. 1988-2000 2001
Boston  20.5 30.2
! [5 g7 a# E" i* F. XSan Diego  22.8 29.7
. U% K$ f/ s- i( u' MSan Francisco  23.8 27.2
Los Angeles  21.3 25.6
( s$ {$ e3 G: }3 wSeattle  20.4 25
Denver  17.7 23.7
- Q7 }% i$ x  D3 R4 N9 ONew York  21.2 22.5
5 w1 P: C2 z4 F* j, EChicago  17.2 20.8
2 e4 u+ l1 C9 ^9 n& V0 wWashington, D.C.  17.1 20.4
9 e: t# b" [7 G( ^
/ p; L: A- ]+ E, b$ s

, x" p/ K  C4 S. H3 kIt's difficult to compare P/Es from one city with those from another. P/Es in Atlantic City, N.J., have wavered between 17.3 and 11.6 since 1988; in San Diego, P/Es have not dropped below 20. But you can look on the P/E as a measure of risk -- that is, the higher the P/E is above its average level, the greater the risk, no matter where you live.
! f1 y. K& J. i
' I/ H4 N2 P4 q
2 g7 }3 s- v5 p1 {From: http://moneycentral.msn.com/cont ... ingguide/P37631.asp

CANDYMAN

Who has the P/E for Edmonton for the last 20 years, please post it here.
/ @3 M) U6 }# W( S+ K; ~  y' O' G2 A* V6 W
it would be a good reference.

7 g, I$ S3 {1 A+ X8 J: ^5 Bthanks

醉酒当歌

20% buble at least. And it can take 3-5 years to digest the bubble if not burst.

[ 本帖最后由 醉酒当歌 于 2007-1-14 16:41 编辑 ]