 鲜花( 1)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
本帖最后由 xchen 于 2015-12-4 17:02 编辑 6 ]' I- N Z4 h/ |- W' b; J
/ B( ~. |( a' S6 R9 P8 [3 a. E0 d
' A+ ], d# C; G5 n' M5 J6 f9 YIf total is 4%, then, calculate the amount for traditional way for a house sold in 400,000, you'll find it will be 4% for total (100000*0.07 + 300000*0.03)/400000 = 0.04, so the same for both. ; V( M* J& [6 e5 `: i# Q6 H
* I% n9 W; g& l! D) ~Let's try to calculate the rate for the traditional way: y = (0.07*100000 + (x-100000))/x => y=4000/x + 0.032 k; I) O9 u% x+ f! W8 T
^- P5 T* U- g5 D) M) Ccomparing 2 realtors using above formular, you will see : 1) if total sale value (x in the formular) > 400,000, traditional realtor < 0.04, then traditional is better since it's < 0.04; 2) total sale value < 400,000, 2% realtor is better since traditional one > 0.04 3) if sale value is 400,000, both are the same..
. g. z& K* Z( L% m; l. ~
, f3 a- M3 x: J9 u% x# Q" ZNote: above comparison is based on the assumption: 2% realtor means 2% for each side realtor (i.e., total 4%) ! ]( E Y) o$ e4 \% K% Q
|
|