 鲜花( 1)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
本帖最后由 xchen 于 2015-12-4 17:02 编辑
* @7 N2 j5 M& t1 Y1 c l; F
9 }" @: `- F b
2 I1 w/ k" h; ^4 B) d$ c2 mIf total is 4%, then, calculate the amount for traditional way for a house sold in 400,000, you'll find it will be 4% for total (100000*0.07 + 300000*0.03)/400000 = 0.04, so the same for both. $ G7 [4 D4 T% I. P, I- y" |
+ H& I1 d" P, @/ R
Let's try to calculate the rate for the traditional way: y = (0.07*100000 + (x-100000))/x => y=4000/x + 0.034 @3 e0 f: \9 s( c5 {$ U# f5 c
; }0 ?; \8 ~; U* l" w$ @comparing 2 realtors using above formular, you will see : 1) if total sale value (x in the formular) > 400,000, traditional realtor < 0.04, then traditional is better since it's < 0.04; 2) total sale value < 400,000, 2% realtor is better since traditional one > 0.04 3) if sale value is 400,000, both are the same..
8 u& [% E. L3 [9 W
/ r* J' [0 p' r6 k5 [, a+ dNote: above comparison is based on the assumption: 2% realtor means 2% for each side realtor (i.e., total 4%) 2 a5 P% d# S5 w3 ^
|
|