咨询一下如果用2% Realty来卖房子有什么坏处？

愤怒的小鸟

哪位用过2%的经纪公司？这个公司收2%是指卖方和买房的经纪合起来收2%吗？有其他的LISTING费用在里面吗？
5 _" V. P) t$ K" L! o1 G* U2 ^7 W谢谢解答

Edmontonian18

One party 2%, the other party 2%, total 4%. Still a little bit less than tranditional 7% of the 1st 100,000.00  3% of the rest of the house sale price. Good luck.

EdHua

it's 1% and 1% totally 2%. but usually the buyers realtor will ask for full commission on his side. so it will be 1% for seller's realtor and 3.5% for buyers realtor.

al877

我曾用这个公司jj 卖房只给了1%, 买方jj2%. 全部经济费3%.

xchen

8 u# B0 C" ?' N& c9 `

Edmontonian18 发表于 2015-11-29 03:14
- P! o9 t/ F; Z% ~: jOne party 2%, the other party 2%, total 4%. Still a little bit less than tranditional 7% of the 1st  ...

If total is 4%, then, calculate the amount for traditional way for a house sold in 400,000, you'll find it will be 4% for total (100000*0.07 + 300000*0.03)/400000 = 0.04, so the same for both.  

Let's try to calculate the rate for the traditional way: y = (0.07*100000 + (x-100000))/x => y=4000/x + 0.03
: V  G) w3 Z' O0 n- @5 e, ^- z$ M
1 F+ Z% {% f: ?- Y+ V: G, \" u* Lcomparing 2 realtors using above formular, you will see : 1) if total sale value (x in the formular) > 400,000, traditional realtor < 0.04, then traditional is better since it's < 0.04; 2) total sale value < 400,000, 2% realtor is better since traditional one > 0.04 3) if sale value is 400,000, both are the same..
( m4 |& Q; b8 s, z3 J
6 V9 O) O% k0 D! pNote: above comparison is based on the assumption: 2% realtor means 2% for each side realtor (i.e., total 4%)