 鲜花( 1)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
本帖最后由 xchen 于 2015-12-4 17:02 编辑
( s+ p) B# j5 ?/ C; TEdmontonian18 发表于 2015-11-29 03:14* A! O. E' n' D5 a7 R" i8 q3 Y2 H
One party 2%, the other party 2%, total 4%. Still a little bit less than tranditional 7% of the 1st ... 7 p2 v# Q' U% @3 J* b
6 y( |2 `- q/ I' r, x2 P$ u5 QIf total is 4%, then, calculate the amount for traditional way for a house sold in 400,000, you'll find it will be 4% for total (100000*0.07 + 300000*0.03)/400000 = 0.04, so the same for both.
3 l& j. N/ F& j& E! L* K
& Z8 t4 x6 ~( A/ L# iLet's try to calculate the rate for the traditional way: y = (0.07*100000 + (x-100000))/x => y=4000/x + 0.03
/ `7 V& D& ^9 W/ R. S" r! z" d. j* D4 w- v% e0 A
comparing 2 realtors using above formular, you will see : 1) if total sale value (x in the formular) > 400,000, traditional realtor < 0.04, then traditional is better since it's < 0.04; 2) total sale value < 400,000, 2% realtor is better since traditional one > 0.04 3) if sale value is 400,000, both are the same..
, X+ _) T" @# p! N: `' G3 U$ F# `
4 W# u# Z( l- M% R$ Y3 Z2 TNote: above comparison is based on the assumption: 2% realtor means 2% for each side realtor (i.e., total 4%) - |1 ]/ M; G+ C& o% ?
|
|