埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2255|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
$ q3 |5 c% I) `: K
; f* l/ H7 l9 |( I) R: Y3 o- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -, R+ K3 J0 [$ p9 ?7 J$ A
0 L7 x9 T% s8 C3 _0 V
    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market& z* x0 H% ~5 z, n
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third3 {- K% B# g& y
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic$ }' l3 {- I4 y/ ]
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
' K( S0 w# X! X+ D* B+ r+ W* c1 vprice gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
% K6 S" d3 n& {6 q% [" {more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,  O5 H0 h1 P" M9 b
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal: n1 X4 m; T% }4 s" t5 M5 U
LePage Real Estate Services.2 R% G6 E) L# V2 ]; J
* J: q& Z% {( p/ Y# _4 ^8 @
    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters7 Z- s% b6 z1 J* l# U
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
* l. E9 m6 v7 ]& @0 H' lconditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and# q. z, T( F' N
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the! o4 B7 A4 z' l  f% \. |0 u
residential real estate sector.
) n4 S7 g: ~  |) s/ F! @# M. t8 r/ s& q9 P  ?  |
    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
7 `! P2 U* m- T+ V/ M% foccurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)& C0 S" B1 N; I7 J, I+ n! h6 f' F2 C1 n
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,5620 _: Z$ J4 l- c8 B& a
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
! s% Y4 R, {2 p; x; Q( F# ^(+13.2%).: ?& C: |2 R% }- L8 ?. I; u

/ O: U; ]! B0 e5 x$ G" a, M    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
: g3 I5 f) e, x+ F. b8 Eduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the9 d) t9 M; j9 u+ b! ]
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are* ?% i' ?  X* o" i4 b' s" b/ T/ H
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,. `) p4 c( X: q0 P1 z
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
+ `# u3 R! y( |2 H& z"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We6 k! a% _  t8 C5 p0 F& G
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
/ c+ s2 p' X; U$ Mbalanced market."
4 `. z/ I( v3 m1 J: E7 `' l; l- U' [; I3 v, R6 a: |
    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
2 |& J2 N4 l+ ^" a, }considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift; M6 M1 \& l. G% w. a2 E
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
: p# \* j( ?! a! Qthroughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
% P/ L7 {4 t( a8 ~, I$ s: Benergy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,& u# N: t* y  Q
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record( v/ y( b; H/ Z! E% W4 P/ a
breaking price appreciations.
. J: I+ {$ A; O9 T" [8 Y) @9 c! ~
    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
: r( M: I: I$ h$ A/ geconomy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
( f2 s% d5 Q1 z  a# Glargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.1 ?9 A5 u8 {# g. P# N5 ~/ U

7 z" p( o3 s9 w8 @* ?# ?    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
& j  X0 s5 u* ^9 O! deconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
! M" J* i4 v% c% jconfidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off$ u6 O7 i7 T1 i) ?( X9 L7 o
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.* J, ?# |) C3 ~( `" {0 V- S
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers+ Y) N" C! o* \4 \- X+ F
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
- ?1 x+ p' j( x; Oprice appreciation when compared with 2005.
  G! n* ]# R4 b8 _0 Z/ E2 u0 r, B9 r* p% ]9 ?% A" V
    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing7 E' q' H# [3 W; L" @! Q* I$ C
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and# ]( p! v, V, f! P
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
; N1 a5 L4 y. Q" C5 v0 N2 y+ uare markedly different than those found in the United States.
5 P4 R+ j* C: J1 w& d
1 i1 r1 P9 k  Q& M6 X+ i    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
9 x& J; Z/ m/ }4 ^# _7 LAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
  e) M0 F4 y% y- X3 Y) [% l0 Dfavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
% }; r0 P* ~* Q! v9 e2 @relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
8 a5 m& u0 R6 h" k, O0 X' ]affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
  i8 t0 U. x* H4 d# S/ c, gdownside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
6 ~: T. m2 G" c; g. A+ b5 Kaggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization2 f0 w* w9 M  v
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."5 Q1 x1 `' O: a/ z

  M9 i5 O+ ~( {# R    <<
. `6 Y; |# g2 ?% v  b                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES# X- v; \" o7 Y. X- i
    >>
# @# r. |+ L2 P  ~4 d% R' g/ C, i7 H
    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
2 B& I/ A  f0 L6 N5 d8 K9 UHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate( v" G+ W& [7 U% d8 r& q/ w
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
& d' w6 w, W; j9 F- olooking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
" e1 O) Y2 J3 Z" V3 q& q! Brenovations.
, T8 Q6 t$ f" P: O4 @+ Q
3 X& {$ F; v( m7 I, S$ x    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight9 Q4 ]1 L/ r7 B2 {- ^0 n
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation- [$ K; q/ {; D  J, `  j% {
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
+ V! {# e& R: Z3 q" V7 Z" W6 ASeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
' T+ n* `. P! E# V: W3 `5 q; `5 p! X# ]5 v' l  i/ E; x
    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer- c: j& L' l" ?. Q
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the' W4 b1 p' g9 E% k& `
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new) z1 W( F+ s) s) z, {& C& n8 U
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
% L& j9 F( q& p4 ito the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
7 {; f; F" \" d+ C; x6 r# uand are instead opting for more affordable housing options.% k" A) ]* \. J) c- f6 H
: c! A' x2 U/ V* b
    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced# Q2 D* c) U8 `1 J
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
( c0 \9 A8 H" e4 t7 c0 f. Ghomes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
  C: c5 p+ A4 ^7 p! k$ dwas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian8 f( z6 z) e2 O6 Q
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
, p$ ~% D. E5 ^# @buyers with more options when looking for a home.& I& w8 `' D' W3 q% h' b

  c4 [. `" B0 B/ f1 q    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
" ]1 X# w+ o9 T+ Lamong higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes( Y" E* P5 j2 k' Q0 \' h* C2 B, J
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,  k! R$ B* K. S" N% h/ A
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last) N- c! c0 h: r" Q/ v, r0 H4 C' f
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
' y4 j/ S% [: U& M) {3 r1 a3 I( a) ]5 A1 I
    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
1 E2 l3 H3 l  B* }- l2 W7 r  ~prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory+ D5 b+ F& a. W" K% I- y
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
' v, y' [$ I6 X5 xfirst-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,( ^3 u7 D& u, H/ Z
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the$ q7 a, d9 p/ v
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before5 K( B5 e- c6 c3 ]
making a purchase.
3 ?+ A+ i1 n- s7 z( p4 n9 w+ O! _9 W3 q+ L
    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
  B, i5 q- O6 kmarkets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong) W2 y: l5 s0 j" Y5 f: g  [
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
/ V% u) d, k5 K3 Fcentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
0 d# r2 K3 l, v2 p3 \6 q& O: sattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown6 `$ T% i. Y1 d+ H+ j- @
amenities.
5 I  U+ N# a! k9 b1 q
0 L6 t* V( w" J! `5 L% |    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
( V7 m: v2 P; I* _throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
0 I9 e; k; p2 d8 kacross the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
9 c7 x& s% u7 q% }8 @' X5 a2 p+ ?continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
9 A1 I! }* _4 A, w& N# h8 Y8 A: [2 xdriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
) F0 q6 r+ q& o, Kresidence, rather than for investment.. P% K+ p( G& Z" G2 `; @

& r3 C3 v, c/ l0 ~( m    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as2 e% A5 \) O- M
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted* W! U2 d: U8 U' T
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer8 Z+ Q# S! ~. k2 H% H8 l2 e/ F
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization  E# U- g" q2 o# H, m4 l* _
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
7 d$ r* x+ |1 ]& X2 y+ H7 v5 Zthe market.
- }7 E! |- }3 Y6 U( i+ Q) m& k
9 {* [- ^2 G$ u8 O    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through  k- q! ?* K" Z8 y' J+ w- K
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
4 Y1 w5 J, b4 QAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring. [- H. G. J6 i$ V' y4 x! |
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
0 }6 a3 c' s; s; b/ u1 Mto the shortage of available inventory.
! ]8 y3 l/ m8 X9 ^9 z1 l# T$ X* ?9 |2 P- P. e( V9 @& M2 e
    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its, b+ G7 o/ o* ]3 _! e, @7 c$ S/ M
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains( c7 J" B7 s+ i+ m
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses: t) y* Z  m: X; m& c# g/ W
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.8 L2 J  w( K/ M( m' j5 a4 O3 y

/ Z! B/ m+ `+ d" k( B) T3 Y* Z    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases8 y" O2 C5 [5 T+ T- H4 ]5 P
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low# l  \( q, C' w4 Z& R2 ?. x
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that2 R: U) n) _+ B* Q
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
. j. w9 y' F, _+ M! q: ?: y) @prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer; K$ _0 _/ W0 }6 `/ }( [2 i( o
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
* A3 z! ^7 i, G$ V8 ?buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.

) ]: S' s. i* q4 c4 B+ v+ M
+ w( c+ [4 z0 I* I% C    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
, K+ X6 b. h- W8 w% Uas activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
! B) j- Y: x  Premained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
3 D3 L: X2 l6 Y+ g3 Umaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
: J0 J: B4 L3 P" Z5 m" qincreasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve9 H, f& \# D7 S) Q) k$ `$ |8 ~  n
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
) X" X2 E! z5 s6 E2 ~2 x# W6 Xtowards the end of 2006.
   
1 A) K; P, B2 M3 u7 ?, @7 c
0 A5 t) l: y! C  `7 G/ ]$ dWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
+ u5 a4 Q7 q/ I9 yinventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
6 h* ~$ c8 x$ R9 H5 \& Hto meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
8 Z, Z' B& b3 J1 ~) x9 Qgroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
8 B# U7 [# \9 _& N* Yforeign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added1 A" o) l! F) ]/ @( v  f
pressure on tight inventory levels.; [$ }/ l! |3 p- ~
* r. W' e6 u. S$ {) l4 M$ ?
    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
7 X: [# _+ J2 D. Pfundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people( Y8 m7 ~  |- _. X$ ?' L- W
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
( V. ~2 }, {+ r4 `/ Kwhile increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
5 u, c" K1 ?  P7 |" g  w  _for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.- C1 C; Y! |  y4 }6 V

$ |4 Q' a# r! ?# c( F' j    <<. Z# b4 G$ e0 @  d8 _% }
      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
* d( v% H2 P- T! C' M; @  c% b0 n
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
7 @4 i4 z. l* G8 F/ |7 r& T$ v0 i                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey8 G: f9 V  M7 @+ V
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------$ q% t6 d: i. a% ?7 p
                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q3/ \- U+ ?( Y$ S6 z7 ?* K
    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average, N% c" b' F& E/ Q3 [+ R% ~
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------" H# z/ l6 u/ ?" j5 s
    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,000" N# P6 e" a  z" E
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
/ h6 f9 ~3 ?' ?$ j    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,000& y, \& U4 g  E$ K/ z2 J5 I
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------# E- ]& Q2 b; a- q
    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,000
0 J7 P' q* ]1 s9 V2 a    -------------------------------------------------------------------------2 C, C* L4 G, o" K: L0 u6 \0 Z
    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -
( Q# W9 B( O1 A" }" `/ b- _    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
: _0 x/ x) L1 ^% B3 F    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,333
5 E' P" {9 {* }6 |; Q    -------------------------------------------------------------------------  J* I: V- t! i" q1 t$ W3 Z+ b4 X
    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,583
1 t( y# [3 q. R; h    -------------------------------------------------------------------------; V( K* I" w( Y" u, L0 J( I
    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,1853 i6 v9 _% r# s9 R
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------9 B4 ^  [. x1 j/ A( U
    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,2506 F" J9 F3 Y% i: q% ]7 }, }
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------8 ^6 |" y% R; \8 J
    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,766
) r( R* R( f; J    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
& T2 t/ C% b+ Y  F$ A( `9 c6 ]1 @    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,7071 p/ G6 V7 G' N6 v, M+ Y
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------$ ?" X% D& p) T7 x
    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,500
: j5 O: X4 ^4 w* F    -------------------------------------------------------------------------4 \- M# U7 `; X$ |" B8 z& r  b" W
    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,389
  R/ [' o8 E9 O1 P* U( o/ @; \    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 v5 a, c  b7 m; X& V    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,714
7 \9 \) Q# N; R' m! o& @; f    -------------------------------------------------------------------------% H$ y1 J, X" D5 j: z
    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,500
0 c0 j, p/ K5 B* J4 p' W    -------------------------------------------------------------------------% w: K  A) D& G; H* ?1 M/ C7 T% a
    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,000& d) \+ O" t6 U2 k9 r
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 C% o. {0 U3 \( W  \    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,860) B1 K4 M4 O2 q* T; h6 s
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------. B+ o% p; A! W! P2 e3 a: z& b

9 V; r/ m5 J$ E; I- Q    -------------------------------------------------------------# {( G; |& h6 m
                               Standard Condominium& i6 B* w2 h; |0 x- s; N
    -------------------------------------------------------------
8 b9 w& S* k2 C9 f8 n5 ^                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo
1 Q, |" u6 R8 p5 l$ g    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change
  D5 d0 h, E5 A* L! a2 N$ a    -------------------------------------------------------------
- j; \0 ?  n! u5 ?* O4 ]    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%- v! j3 N' ^7 U8 w
    -------------------------------------------------------------
, c, X$ d) c" P9 N    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%8 Z8 }/ w1 K6 D
    -------------------------------------------------------------
) C' U3 O/ n7 X    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A
) X& b1 ~. T. J( o) j    -------------------------------------------------------------1 J8 e5 T" `3 e/ c% b
    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A
+ ]9 o7 ^0 Y  a/ T' I3 t6 |    -------------------------------------------------------------
( ^- o/ v$ R; f: p* d    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%6 O4 y$ ~2 r$ N8 e: T. u& T* ^! h
    -------------------------------------------------------------7 Z; R! {  Z& i- d" M7 M, M
    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%
5 Z* I  t9 Q. J    -------------------------------------------------------------
2 Z+ J5 e& t2 Y$ X% b2 P    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%' \; V" M( b: {' n
    -------------------------------------------------------------
( v, r3 ]$ h1 r7 y+ M% H    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%
+ \- I8 C5 ~; i" r0 f) I- Z2 `6 [    -------------------------------------------------------------" D5 d8 E$ Q. k5 a+ {: _) l- b: B
    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%2 q( `! m* U3 D4 _& F. H/ _, x6 S
    -------------------------------------------------------------
) ]- L0 {& J) S# O  W    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%
( c$ a: z$ m" m& r, ?! {( t( Z/ e    -------------------------------------------------------------8 h" m( @% p. P5 t; x
    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%6 N- r  O3 I# J- |
    -------------------------------------------------------------; M4 I9 r9 \2 V4 |/ T- m) T
    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%( {. \  |! s5 g
    -------------------------------------------------------------
1 C3 k' u3 X8 K2 C" w+ _    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%
8 A4 U( P. x( F- Y, v- h    -------------------------------------------------------------! S+ _# D/ l' ?& |
    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%3 E1 J/ I9 ?+ ]2 h9 f4 K
    -------------------------------------------------------------
- o7 B  n' Y9 L1 Y& C1 z- I    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%
4 L2 r5 W! c  z6 I5 R- v: I    -------------------------------------------------------------. |! M' |7 y) D* E
    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%1 p3 u! h0 z1 [* w; I  i. n! c
    -------------------------------------------------------------7 @; I8 ^( M, |1 k  x
    >>
3 t$ m" G4 j% ~
4 t+ ~; Z. Z: p* h3 ]6 O' Q' Y9 |    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
4 R# }4 Z" H' X, oin the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint2 M2 P% y1 y7 m0 w4 X4 [) V
John and Victoria.' Y6 N1 e+ m2 q1 D4 M# @( Q

" x, a" x6 @/ t7 e; W    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
! }# t& ?/ d1 s$ hcomprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of' W, a/ ~- u0 _. B+ r
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
4 M0 ?0 o2 n. `7 u$ X; dreferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price1 x: W. [  J; |: Q& v
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
/ H2 z# J$ c4 N/ f, S; Eacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is" [) L9 Z# }- @, y' \$ x; {2 ~2 B% |
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current- y5 x' r  }+ w$ l. S% J* z
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable( p9 T8 u( ?4 ~; h: S9 w
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
. I4 w0 J) z: H( S& @- ENovember 15, 2006.& ?- f* {/ [3 J  g
    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
: k, e# q! T3 z4 X- M" I/ A( W* R. Qfair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
% P1 B' J7 m# ?" g9 a' J  ~provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
% Q. g- D3 h: Z& savailable for some areas back to the early 1970s.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-3-16 19:36 , Processed in 0.122694 second(s), 9 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表