 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
9 L1 ~1 O" P, `) T) F' u3 k6 u
8 E, ~9 ~: _5 v* s: B! o- {0 T- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
$ z/ }/ a, U' y' ?$ ^& I
) s, H9 a! K. ?: M% F! r TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
0 E2 Q: t7 j* |8 }, P7 N# D2 A6 B# eexhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third' c1 P: R) U- e. A3 v! M# m3 ^
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
8 ~5 m' M( V$ {$ t$ Nin the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
( j8 R& {" H" K1 j8 ~price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and- ^# Z1 P1 v6 C4 B% U
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,0 Q+ V0 G/ k8 F
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal4 ]- r$ E2 A& s( ^. |
LePage Real Estate Services.7 M* P2 b- C3 g' l U
" U& ~, R# L9 u, q$ K- B, v
Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters0 B( `% ?* n- K! |
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic" Z+ u1 B- W+ s& i
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and5 L. o* a' Q/ E! P8 ~6 v
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
' e" @! V0 p2 Rresidential real estate sector.- ]1 k" K s2 O( t6 j
4 w+ K# O9 F3 e! ]8 C Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation% b$ p2 m: T8 k2 i7 f
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)7 S: `8 o- w7 r
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562, \" F# N0 | @) e6 z0 z1 D
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,3809 {! [9 ~4 e: N7 @0 S) i# }) ]. [! E
(+13.2%).4 W) J, e8 w* X# a
* H# s/ \; o6 i "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
0 S. X$ r( z# K$ K0 Aduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
: m5 c! r: m7 H9 W! N, J7 vfrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are- f) U% G+ q# r
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
8 w, o8 i4 S. |president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.% i0 k+ | x, [) Z
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
% z# G! [2 `+ [6 dwelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
, |! B3 V6 ^& F5 y5 ^& X) [$ @balanced market."- t2 ~6 |, s/ w* G
- _+ n" V1 t4 [* N& b1 \. E
Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
1 {9 r+ Q3 \) n, }, R5 | J) Tconsiderable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
/ v3 U; K! _6 f5 \: Hto balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
; g- i% ^7 O F+ E" x: Z" E) {" Kthroughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core" J( \) f! P6 H, u o
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,( u8 V# d, s# L. [+ b4 {
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record0 T B5 J; z! X/ ?2 y
breaking price appreciations.
+ v: `. L- N; \5 ^+ y& x8 T
1 A3 e" h4 e' v' r4 m/ U2 _ Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding7 q/ ~0 j/ k3 R; o ]5 q3 o
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
* L5 x# j! }' a& o7 Tlargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.# {1 }; a6 b* l
4 L' [7 I+ W& N4 x$ O In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
- G% R; c+ L9 ~5 x, yeconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer7 d$ G; y# K& J- u7 _5 A) f, s
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off' C* Y5 J6 N3 G
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.5 @7 z1 L. ]7 a1 T! {) b1 W _& [
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers& Z U; w* b* f' E
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of- ~4 N' }8 Z; N8 \& J
price appreciation when compared with 2005.
8 S' x1 A2 ~( C4 @+ Z1 b( N9 @5 s" v% |# r0 Q0 z% m
While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing8 w* C% w( v- d6 [
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
( \$ Z5 Y0 i; [financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada" h6 H% |1 _1 K$ i. I
are markedly different than those found in the United States.
' S: Y! l* E# r9 C5 x3 s' h# w, Q" p5 A9 M/ p! |
Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the' j$ `, S* i7 x2 ` E3 W+ J% g) |) D
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
) D S; w' S. Gfavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
/ h b5 t/ P, }- W. K& g) t9 Jrelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
3 U [- H2 C: i, A+ F1 F+ f3 s: Zaffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
8 A8 |: m9 i$ l6 Sdownside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and% p0 T6 Y$ Q6 C* Z4 c8 q1 o* s+ ]- G5 B. ]
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
' q4 n8 s0 {/ h# Y& Jmortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."2 v6 A1 F, q2 c$ F4 I- e! `8 J' U
4 U- ^! _1 P c- S( h2 _. O
<<, W) {$ f! ` c0 z- G
REGIONAL SUMMARIES x7 i+ |) d& p$ c
>>
" a+ J2 ^5 s* h8 [6 `
6 o5 F* b7 o' [: ~0 a- x! M5 U Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
. a) w& M& B; d5 O# PHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
7 H- a. d' \- _9 w5 F1 Xof price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time9 \% Z/ n) i t, V
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of5 j' G7 I, @: z% v- a- s. i
renovations.2 ]3 }4 w4 @' c/ k9 ~. D) r
8 E' U: d5 A7 V j' \. m( A The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
' Q8 O4 l! N4 C( Z! t. E/ J0 nincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation+ G9 D3 o0 Y: Z& L8 c
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and; j: C( ?5 t* |, N
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.6 R! t# y3 U5 ]8 B$ e9 K
2 r' ^- Z+ J/ | U/ Q& Y6 F1 k The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
6 q8 B- B6 G0 Q0 E0 p, c5 Bslowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the5 j6 {' E0 C: h& y
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new; V+ D& Y4 ?7 G" E! K% d
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores& s5 `( @$ {) A# E; |* \
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes( d4 a' C( |+ Y& D
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options., a4 [/ z2 G* p- W) p
. g* g% a. f- R7 e# L
In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
; B- { o* q5 R$ P0 N1 rconditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
! D; D) R8 d7 d$ @' xhomes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers) S2 V$ h$ a" @0 C
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
! Q1 w/ |+ d$ ?% W2 w; O" B- adollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
. s. e `% g. Y5 L* w: \* r ibuyers with more options when looking for a home.
0 }- N6 Q& V- Y# m$ i+ \) j/ \( @$ G: ?4 W
Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly$ _' B: O% @: Y5 R: N* z2 U
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
/ W1 f0 H5 p: i( W e: A2 hpriced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,' `- y% ~* a) M; k. F! j N9 Y
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last5 d- L% P% U- M: M) R; T/ y
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.7 y$ A$ c$ i3 x0 \( u
* p% U; \: z% J5 A7 x Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
9 ~- n# T8 ]& T9 u! x$ bprices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
$ X$ m$ O; t' F! }% X% c$ Glevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting% h+ s) L: Z! G/ z2 D; x1 e
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
$ o( E' T& z- s8 f1 ~. c3 }when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
$ n3 o1 `: z E) Tpressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before0 K8 ~+ Y- `) K0 W. p3 P) ?4 b; H- {
making a purchase.
' d. D3 k K! L2 w( D% t) i# ]+ x! Y7 ^ G3 Z
Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing, d0 s6 Y# L7 g9 R) v1 p, p' h( k
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong- Q1 n$ B) G) w* t" S
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
7 V& y, H. }- M: c l' scentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting d o7 d" u3 L; q
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
2 @# e" I. A) ? p% P; Camenities.
7 T) K" p% W- \6 ~8 g0 b% [, I& q) c3 r$ F
The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
/ u w8 _8 C5 R+ |& }9 z5 ?throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
: k8 | u' y& D, o# j5 Facross the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
7 ?3 E! d, p$ N: ~/ }) E' _continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been, l( j( S# {/ a! N+ ?& s
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
2 m6 {0 e& u& @; y. a! dresidence, rather than for investment.
0 b0 D, K$ q ` w' l, S
( A' r5 b4 i9 \" t) h The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
6 M8 Z. d" T0 ^9 A6 G" phouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted: C% |$ D' Y4 i. F l. b9 B+ U
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer) d! u6 V8 N. d+ @
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization+ P9 b+ }! K9 C6 c( [
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
+ f( ~& U6 B7 T- u: r0 S) Ithe market., W9 t9 p1 A5 R6 _
?3 n8 }+ x/ J% c- X In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through* J4 N1 w0 u# K! W" R2 J/ W
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
% L% J* D7 C) r2 ~3 J2 RAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring6 N5 B t5 g/ t0 R- A' \
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
1 ]7 ^. Z- _( A5 J z: hto the shortage of available inventory.
0 S- W: S( u$ i1 U$ @0 `. R3 R1 I" H: v3 q6 o5 [. u
Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
9 C. t+ e3 Z6 y. I0 H0 \7 ?momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains% r! Z! `" Q: A0 c& |; Z( P; }
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
; T0 \: l# i# [/ Hstruggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.6 M, O2 m/ {) L2 Q
3 T- b; R' Q3 H. o/ G Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases9 i5 T2 X0 I5 @) x/ d4 Q
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
, h/ c: R( }' r1 u1 g. r$ c: j. wunemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
: T0 }- l9 n3 F, p( a) S( Opressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
* Y0 o% _ B9 h& Y$ ]5 B {4 Fprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer9 |: d0 U" A7 N/ |/ ]8 d
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as4 a( U- n. Z% R, C8 s
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
7 U2 F- a" _, V
: X$ t& G" I" p& l8 Z( j( | Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
; d% _. k# s" ^' T" l( U$ Mas activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton2 c2 T3 E- C- ~
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
, T+ _4 e; k0 v1 ]) U3 vmaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices9 i, H5 ?# g j s: |$ t" P7 m
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve" E& h0 H0 e! O, T4 |1 Z
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly9 l B9 S0 M" x
towards the end of 2006.
) z) P1 U* k) {0 \8 p( c
! T6 f$ h! x; S4 V7 cWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of0 L6 d- u4 @$ K. k: V
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable- l6 c1 s2 x+ w& F
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
1 C0 m& Y* N; R5 S1 A+ k! Qgroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
" @0 h0 J. c# rforeign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
4 T- Q0 U, H N$ [. q" Fpressure on tight inventory levels.
" O! {" S' @0 E7 n. g" ]# N: L1 p# Z. K4 D- {) s2 D& t
Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
4 Y% [' T/ U) Jfundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
2 J8 k9 V( x0 b6 Y- pinto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
" ~2 G) m2 w6 O* P& B! \while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching! Q. p( y. b. E1 c
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
3 }9 n& h$ v% J' m. j! I, ]2 `& }% _; i3 ]& g
<<! L$ S) W; g3 {! U9 B
Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 20063 M7 a2 x8 X2 b, g5 Z2 G: @. |
! v3 x! z/ ]5 H3 a4 e2 i -------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ A0 s. h9 h: d; n& L+ i+ [ Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey
& ]% o! U: {; {2 a9 G% c% Q -------------------------------------------------------------------------1 z$ ?$ ^" Q. j% Z# S7 v! j
2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3
5 U9 {; N/ ^& c8 A3 M2 C0 M% p Market Average Average % Change Average Average2 ^. J# Y _! D0 _
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
& G6 k$ Q7 A4 x Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000
8 J) B3 }2 I9 T% N/ I' q/ d* W -------------------------------------------------------------------------# M# S. V2 N+ c; Z
Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000
5 ]% a, ?& `# `; _" Q* ^/ G7 r -------------------------------------------------------------------------
% Z6 w* V( U; E+ M7 y; P Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000
5 Z' r! P( n4 x) r4 o3 \+ O -------------------------------------------------------------------------
8 _" J/ d7 {) Q" X Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -
/ K% N \9 T# W! G" |4 x -------------------------------------------------------------------------, ~$ u/ d1 R& z! [8 T& w
St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333) O. ~/ T$ n) a4 D
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
5 N9 i* H! E! n! a% @6 l$ d Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583) Z* H* F+ r" l' y: e; V
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 O0 N9 [9 |& P% R1 z- q: E Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185
; @! G6 B' V" S8 Q+ M* L" M9 x -------------------------------------------------------------------------4 @- p9 V8 J+ |0 c- ^4 c) @
Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250
}$ m9 v8 h$ h# C -------------------------------------------------------------------------5 w7 D0 e$ w8 K, t: X$ Y6 {
Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766
, M, m- V- T+ \- S, ` d ------------------------------------------------------------------------- H" K7 s6 C' M
Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707
2 Z2 h5 e2 S4 H( d: {& H: v -------------------------------------------------------------------------6 R' ^6 l5 ?) C) F1 L) X f
Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500
5 f8 q- J8 A5 c1 n" I -------------------------------------------------------------------------2 W" [. H8 {/ I5 w. O
Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389
' z2 U6 J! J# O m* i -------------------------------------------------------------------------" `6 \0 D) ?% \# K2 M8 i
Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,7145 Q" F1 ?1 X" w
-------------------------------------------------------------------------) i. E2 X% c, T a
Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500 ]5 W! F7 v9 z$ x7 S) i
-------------------------------------------------------------------------- r- ?6 n; v; t0 I: o: S; ?
Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000
9 Z$ ^" N2 o" [: J2 { -------------------------------------------------------------------------6 A! B: u3 t3 v
National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860$ U: O: m$ {. p7 G: k, E
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
9 A4 o5 p! n6 ~: f: x
. r& V! N/ H; ` -------------------------------------------------------------0 A4 p6 h7 o9 h7 G
Standard Condominium
# t6 P. g" _# W/ w8 J -------------------------------------------------------------4 w6 p) I8 t6 J& X& _% y
2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo
: q- u z2 [* d' w Market % Change Average Average % Change
# Y2 o8 O e9 v -------------------------------------------------------------: L( O# ^ x# e5 n, y
Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%
: A) U3 \" e' `) o" `4 W2 Q -------------------------------------------------------------
6 C7 K' i2 {; ^7 ^3 v+ e! q0 S Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%
# c! q* r6 I0 P- z9 |; v- s X -------------------------------------------------------------
6 P, l9 W, l& v+ u, I7 p3 D) b Moncton 4.9% - - N/A$ N. U9 V0 B" z
-------------------------------------------------------------% t% f% W( ^9 ^5 F" T
Saint John N/A - - N/A/ r1 d' X. m* b" t. f$ e: s. o0 ^
-------------------------------------------------------------4 J8 z2 y& D. p% v. x, r! B$ p
St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%+ ^$ g$ |. W5 X
-------------------------------------------------------------1 p. h4 g0 B- R( U5 a$ V, ]
Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%% f) ~2 o, Z( O5 Y
-------------------------------------------------------------
- B4 W1 z3 W! K7 N8 ^* c* E. \/ G Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%
' Y) ?7 ~4 C9 k5 B3 [! d& Y, T4 [& y -------------------------------------------------------------" d) L6 N, s$ W# c4 b) ^
Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%, w0 u, b" C% N8 e- T, L
-------------------------------------------------------------% H0 k6 R" b D3 ]; c: E2 B; }# e
Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%
I0 f4 @ A" i1 s! p -------------------------------------------------------------: u8 R8 v0 U. H# _! V
Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%8 k: ?3 F/ o- i7 v* R! E
-------------------------------------------------------------. o/ R& a& o+ @
Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%7 f0 b5 \8 f, B8 s
-------------------------------------------------------------
/ z1 N* V' u) h' M. j6 K Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%& `3 l. d- h7 U0 n
-------------------------------------------------------------
0 T8 }, J5 m- _4 E/ t Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%$ q! M, X+ R6 v, E) y$ V% S: R3 D
-------------------------------------------------------------: w1 W* P0 q3 [
Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%
# ~3 i P5 k; ]7 M. ]+ H7 A -------------------------------------------------------------+ B/ R$ \& {" M( i: }* n2 e
Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%
$ L7 ]4 M% e0 M -------------------------------------------------------------: Q k9 J w5 [& u6 `3 L5 V
National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%1 Z& G% |, S" m, [# _
-------------------------------------------------------------/ K% \ [, x5 ~, u' D+ ]/ Z. I
>>
3 ^5 v6 ?" ]* Q- ^0 o) ^$ D7 t `9 t, V0 I" A
Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined1 ?4 v2 O$ n: h8 A6 a# N1 L
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint. N8 Q3 B) ^, q1 `
John and Victoria.% u- Y1 B' b/ Q0 z+ E( q- w6 M' I
% A* u# o$ Q B! \3 ]+ U O6 S/ h
The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
( T( ?( x* C5 K9 o6 s/ dcomprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
8 K3 a# \5 w0 Y, v' S$ r4 c- shousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
0 H+ v" m* O& m7 q% v# R Freferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
% z1 u6 ~0 \4 ktrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities, r5 L" u5 @+ k
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is1 q+ O: ?) e8 @" G8 ?
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current. E) p% D0 y4 F$ Q/ ?4 ^
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
- g3 F' C$ E( U8 Rversion of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on# `7 d1 w* i0 r
November 15, 2006.: \1 t, ?+ X& p! w- r' g& ]
Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
- v, T- [8 P: l/ \# vfair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge6 o; a- W3 \, \# U9 I$ n6 C. W
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
# k" U _9 B& }) n( T+ h$ y/ Yavailable for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|