 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable , F+ `4 C0 C( @0 Z/ F. a% @
2 K* W" ?3 L L9 u. t- y- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
" K+ c6 V; J2 h L8 _4 H- F( u) x* O" e: z
TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
/ W$ \7 O# z c8 ]# |/ Qexhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third ]+ W9 P9 Q3 t8 G3 C4 m7 G5 B
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
; u. u3 {2 c& L3 F; kin the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
( \2 p8 \" j/ s C' z" U4 fprice gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and: c M# I; t8 f7 K* O. |
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
/ {( `/ Y5 _2 K' U; d/ \3 TQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal% u, {. T, h- r
LePage Real Estate Services.
m" Z; Y; g$ T* t' c
* n# U% R# C0 O, \, P' ~ Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
$ m! k9 G' i1 X" A9 O) ?3 Tare forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
% F, `# w9 |! x- `conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
. p6 p4 d0 g+ U; `1 n: d& U4 Usound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the* @: t- m0 {$ [% | E; Z( ]% v
residential real estate sector.
$ Q3 ^9 j' F0 S ~
9 U0 F' w/ s- q" s Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation: [/ V2 I9 H. u& F2 z
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
' A3 t* |" W4 H$ Z eyear-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
2 i# @0 Y! g4 \& P" s(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
6 F {# c& i2 L) r(+13.2%).
" G! C% q" @ E
$ B* i- M# G! `+ _- k$ d( z "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth" v0 [& J- p# X, h& X; Q, G
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the! O( |1 E5 b$ s5 ~7 r* n7 k
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
+ |2 f& G" i$ `6 G& Xpoised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,2 E j' y6 X( |( J6 d1 `
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
$ e/ ?$ A" z0 u# A/ M"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
/ U- H5 w# u9 k9 N4 j N% fwelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy* t3 V9 g) o" g1 H
balanced market."0 [0 A4 `, G$ v4 r
! ?% h5 _4 p } w
Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
4 ?8 Q3 i2 q2 y: Lconsiderable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift3 m2 c: T0 Q. q3 u
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
6 w( H4 V' g3 H$ p4 j0 c+ { cthroughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core8 a- L0 G% @1 d# }
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
0 X+ o4 _7 I( {$ n5 ? }, Qmanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record6 {. j' @; s \, B/ l
breaking price appreciations.
# A0 u; `4 X# a
# K, B4 \& Z: ]8 {) B( s I Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
3 X6 Q" ]4 b, v5 {% E8 Neconomy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
7 `' Y- h; Q4 J9 V3 j: Tlargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
5 c# V( T) B+ V0 d) n- v: Q& C3 I F3 Z. B3 D
In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid3 q! o( n; a& e( h& C
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer; P5 N9 y f. O D. b; x
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
+ G5 k! [" l: }# \* \slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
$ B1 S" n1 l) }' h- D; NIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers' o8 Y% y3 S0 D u' \$ V1 N2 g
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of, p0 d$ c- W2 C
price appreciation when compared with 2005.
4 W+ t8 h6 S0 z8 u% L
$ g+ U& f) `8 `3 O1 q3 E While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
2 p: }9 I a5 q- T, Pmarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and. ]$ B8 c$ p- W2 B9 @, s. y
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
9 C4 L, d" {- U8 aare markedly different than those found in the United States.2 \6 }4 a% ?1 v- P- x/ r: Z: G: ~
9 h k3 R4 l$ |5 P$ u4 c: s Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the( ~) W3 i1 _7 e f- @ |1 w( ^
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
( G. I' i. I( p) C; N, R. Nfavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the- `+ H- z6 P: ?6 Y! ^" Z
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general8 \% c: r3 ]# z* _. A
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the+ i# |, n% s5 G0 {. a0 O6 V8 E! d
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and/ E# w$ F/ k* l# Z2 R" j! C
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization$ c5 G2 r4 S$ P0 o* Q) v0 K
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."$ A9 y. g1 r! N1 T$ m2 ^
5 P$ S5 T9 f y4 q <<
! W' @ T- ?$ h0 E$ \. s6 K REGIONAL SUMMARIES
. R, w) s+ Y7 q- g. H8 l, s >>* n7 T( C1 q l3 N! G$ a/ `
6 U% ~, \" J- a p3 T Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
/ }4 t3 b- X! OHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
! D2 S: |, n8 H. lof price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
. t8 B( O) y9 Y* k- r0 L; D! Rlooking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of S1 i1 z4 {+ B+ T6 X
renovations.4 B6 p0 w& I( u- P1 r2 m
/ \# H5 k. z1 \+ W# a The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
* v9 ^7 }4 v/ D Y+ e( }6 W& W- Rincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
" e# x D# k$ O+ g; ?+ Xcompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and6 A# ~9 ~( t( L; m" t
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter. R9 X( M! q" P8 X
$ L9 w6 N. B% Z% Q# o
The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
' G ^$ ` f7 `" m* T4 i0 {, @' U; [slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the) j1 N5 A4 {! F
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
9 v6 y* ]0 R2 \7 Q1 H+ E600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores+ @# L1 S6 i. A" [) w, Q/ b
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes' F$ \7 o+ f: T7 M9 g8 v* M% e
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
. i8 _% o1 y# f5 ^: g4 w% x4 |+ h0 M+ J9 j7 |* R; D4 f N/ l
In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced6 D, E5 u! o- e; p; r
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their- W3 w+ R! i6 t8 K' u5 p
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
( q+ S8 M+ h) c \. A) p, pwas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian- C" v9 Q; @ b# q
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
0 @' s9 r1 f* C- q+ d. Qbuyers with more options when looking for a home.
+ n# N: x6 M5 C9 j9 x( D$ f2 z
; J, T* ^3 ~4 }: G Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
0 B7 I( _9 B+ g/ F' p; ^among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
9 j( O2 U# z& P) n8 x& jpriced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,6 ~7 ?9 Q/ ^( N5 U1 r
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last' l+ ?6 L5 H7 k$ f- H
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.- d/ c# r B1 }
( h3 B. Q4 b' {3 q- C Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house/ ]* k$ ^9 @+ X# o
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
c: a s; r( m" l$ elevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting* R& ^. G. c; w
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,& i- D) C y8 ]& {6 x) e
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
" _! k v/ k$ w5 xpressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before% c& S5 ^. L. y
making a purchase.
! ]6 I4 d" t9 a* Y* d; u) _& v( e8 X
Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
$ ^; B- x! g! Gmarkets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong9 K( [ ]# w5 R0 J& B: y! Z
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
; J6 N( M3 H" Ocentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting! K0 o& G3 k C& g1 W8 P
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown- Q3 o6 ^& j! Z; j$ i) | u& {: E
amenities.
- w/ Y/ X; f, q, n! [; u# \" \- T, g- N- g
The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
; V, k' C' q/ A5 \- J6 m4 ethroughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand& [! p) ^! D) s$ h2 _5 R" J
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has" Q0 o( Z* g9 [) l! F9 g9 L4 F2 C
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
8 i* R9 Q1 h5 Y0 ~5 I8 S2 c! g2 M# }1 Pdriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
( I) O2 f& B4 ]! j" Y8 cresidence, rather than for investment.. z3 @2 Y s6 } g% g
" k! S; T9 O- |: P The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
7 I, }0 E+ O. t, _: I# b; t" `2 uhouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
) c7 K: [ Y- Q6 Y1 i. l- din a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
% f- ~/ G p! _ ^0 Dconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization) \1 E9 c: O/ T8 R4 S( {
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
9 }$ I9 M0 _7 O e! p L5 }: L9 Gthe market.
8 g7 w& i$ D3 Y5 `- M1 X) t
: f: e; [, p7 g3 r2 c5 H% y. @ In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
6 |' R. K9 S/ i) I# h2 b) }9 fJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In. {0 N. |! Y$ ]! V& p! L$ Q, {
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
( ~% H! q: t+ H7 v1 ?- J( P. L6 Rmonths, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due z# N3 _5 w6 B/ }
to the shortage of available inventory.
" a, u6 e7 c- S+ J. @% u |0 W. W M
Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
- q1 [2 m( o" k% x, x" q1 i3 M+ k tmomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains" n4 Q3 l( Q9 E4 j
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses2 D3 o% B! T ]6 [
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
2 n2 o$ ?' n5 }9 F4 v1 q) w# v* r
3 l+ p. Z( H( h$ P, N6 y9 m# @ Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases0 I# L3 v* ?! k$ B* p j' c: n
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
( g( O! E }" D8 E5 i) X: ^unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that3 [+ z1 K3 b, n4 {& S3 g
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
; d$ i6 J. ^6 e3 K# S* _0 Eprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
6 Q2 O8 t% B3 N* l( ~( Q2 Eseason - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
* u' L% C3 D4 kbuyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
: L/ a# b* m0 I/ C: t3 O( { q' A, p- W) D7 J9 N* F. `& i, N
Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
0 \6 O0 g% s. e9 Das activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
8 ^- i6 y0 W: X4 T2 j* yremained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,' I! l4 c+ A7 }& L1 m
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices" K# X- L/ e+ e
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
4 d" m, N) m v' {0 S$ rin the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly/ v/ s0 Q' j% A# z! `9 T+ O6 H9 Q
towards the end of 2006.
7 }$ _* M! T' E; d0 ^4 d i1 m! P, f, z/ D" f2 w
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of: A! M% `/ c! Y# h7 Z. m/ A% v
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable" ^3 v. M8 s7 I$ [: v- z) L+ i9 T
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse" T* R- G& r. a7 {
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
( H* F1 ~9 v y7 ^4 q% i4 N9 hforeign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added5 e. H9 F. W# M" E+ c
pressure on tight inventory levels.4 e9 ?0 i; n% R3 ~- r
! ] G2 l/ F9 L( K+ S* o- e4 O: D Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
1 C0 i6 r2 r5 y- a( Y# v; j9 nfundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
6 B3 P: o; {( R& cinto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;' n0 D$ ? U. M% J4 D0 a1 N
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching7 l1 z0 F" {* D/ o; j4 ]
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.; L3 |- W. Y" K% ?- a y
4 W; v/ p% [1 S- S& `. D
<<# x( P# ]& C/ } R0 O
Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006% g: [* G% t" j" M! G& z) f
( j" z0 ~3 Q5 H7 \& {4 Z) B+ C -------------------------------------------------------------------------) P* k5 o3 [" w1 z9 _& z
Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey
8 u5 x3 {6 ^" Y -------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 E6 L3 e1 y- y% k3 n/ [/ _" u 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q30 G, K) o T' N1 n" U
Market Average Average % Change Average Average, u% C% a; x: e( L6 h% O5 ~
-------------------------------------------------------------------------" K5 k4 H& {4 X$ ^+ A
Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000
! F; C1 ^$ P& f9 q -------------------------------------------------------------------------
* d3 E+ B/ _- X8 _ Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000# l, F% ~, j) w4 |" A
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
, U4 h+ J7 t8 p! k* p Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000; G, L9 h, e6 `: f
-------------------------------------------------------------------------6 T: k9 a# z+ ~: @; g4 r
Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -, F% f, m$ E; g+ ]
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
) a. E( y' h% P1 a0 ^ St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333' m' e) \+ J! w- l7 T5 a
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
: g& W9 B2 A6 U, l Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583
0 ?" d9 h8 l% a- m -------------------------------------------------------------------------1 m) q- u+ N" ~0 l: r1 [+ |6 ?1 |
Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185
; @, y% |* f2 d- S* p* b9 Y( U -------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 E7 _) t, |! L" |! I/ ^ Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250
6 o3 l. K9 D9 W% [* } -------------------------------------------------------------------------. E! I$ z1 m% V# Q1 ^& y( G
Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766! y; x" ]* `' l. J# m8 |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------. K% k. }4 G" I* H# L+ l- S+ q A
Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,7079 r" w3 c9 F( Z0 V
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 o3 _ h9 ?7 q' Z h) J7 W Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500
( `8 X" `# u# u' }6 Y- a -------------------------------------------------------------------------" K e) D6 k' z* S: @
Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389) @# T- E& v1 B8 R& Z# u
-------------------------------------------------------------------------. h% C# D. J+ M( k2 B" R$ o
Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714
7 h s' B4 W9 p' |3 z' \ -------------------------------------------------------------------------
; r5 n; s* `$ z' I! G% Z Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500& v4 m. N7 Y, Q5 ]" U. j* m
-------------------------------------------------------------------------! o, p& C% \1 g1 H1 g b
Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000
2 F2 j* S3 ]! l+ Q+ s -------------------------------------------------------------------------
# {- }. Q* M$ W: C$ q National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860
/ M( l* s1 \ j) i# J# a -------------------------------------------------------------------------
- z! J) `" \- u$ R8 Q1 c9 ~$ ^/ o# V+ _4 e5 I& m" m# \, {
-------------------------------------------------------------" q0 _# `) d: b3 A
Standard Condominium( R9 X! r/ L, [$ k7 ]% R
-------------------------------------------------------------" H7 D0 I' r# Q2 B
2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo! X: o) d- i5 ?$ [( L! _7 r
Market % Change Average Average % Change6 e; O, X$ r0 S3 @$ K! M
-------------------------------------------------------------* X7 ^& H ~+ C$ y p
Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%
, M* ~& n9 @% W: c" v" L+ ] -------------------------------------------------------------
* _: l7 [$ J, C9 P Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0% f: N( V4 r) T; O. Q D! `
-------------------------------------------------------------- B, [# K' m( [4 w/ a1 X1 I& n
Moncton 4.9% - - N/A
4 L- O3 y8 ]( q# ~/ A( L -------------------------------------------------------------$ Q% t. q+ W- u0 b
Saint John N/A - - N/A
0 h, g* H! q1 d- Z/ a, ? -------------------------------------------------------------$ y# A1 f) o- @) K
St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%
: H: J4 y- y" S+ Q. f -------------------------------------------------------------& l+ S' @+ v2 c& N+ [. \2 G
Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%
. c+ G- m! g9 M! a5 M+ ^' P" v: i -------------------------------------------------------------
2 |$ l& S+ y" }8 u Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%; q$ w) g- L* f- t
-------------------------------------------------------------* s$ |- P3 ~3 S# N- U7 W
Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%
3 u% u0 K+ p: v$ L9 g- h -------------------------------------------------------------
# }3 j9 I: Y8 W$ z) [4 p5 r0 w/ a Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%
$ }! W9 l$ m/ q3 W& p5 a6 G) x' E6 C -------------------------------------------------------------4 E/ y+ F$ c4 o' A1 l) w' ^
Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%/ N: T5 w% B7 A8 T' p! u1 T
-------------------------------------------------------------
6 t9 [/ e2 j; ^, S Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%
& \, e( V: ?. o# G8 F8 _ -------------------------------------------------------------% k2 y0 k4 X" ^: ~
Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%
- I. @, a0 f/ ^! S" \) h& W -------------------------------------------------------------( d) z; m0 i# W% Y( Q5 q
Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%
9 Q3 ~# \9 J" r* }( s$ z! ~- L1 [ -------------------------------------------------------------
. C+ U& P2 p, r3 n. q2 Q Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%3 R& {. D% u8 R; q% |
-------------------------------------------------------------' D2 S0 c! M/ _7 \6 z3 ^- b- g8 k+ n
Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%
2 u; q$ w: s9 b9 F3 s: x$ S( C -------------------------------------------------------------4 B/ e, _! i, w9 x
National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%. I- [4 g2 U7 U
-------------------------------------------------------------5 H& c& P5 ~0 a" b, l* T3 T
>>
" m5 S; V" T8 g& n/ c7 H% W2 H8 Y7 ^ c i
Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined C0 t" {1 K/ l B, L0 V
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
! p: t5 l! H1 d* h; C m. n7 o7 YJohn and Victoria.
/ S. f2 W# A0 h6 B& n, T- a% _# E6 r
! B/ y2 Q3 L: `, _, J The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most8 W2 |$ H- y4 i# ? `, i
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
/ ^: i& @1 K# l) Ehousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release/ k, Z# q* Q4 [+ O
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
6 o/ x4 S: y) w. P- ztrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities g4 @$ N# c5 s* _5 L% S
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is# S9 B7 y. v& Z
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current, w9 r% r( Z1 q" c8 X# R. W& G
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
; X6 {! N1 `/ n! A0 E' ^1 @' K0 {version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on/ u' a( L M* I- \
November 15, 2006.$ @! P. z3 u! E5 \ j* ^7 f7 Y
Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of6 i X I- r$ h: l5 s0 w9 `
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge. f$ p( Z0 D' _5 t1 X ^7 k
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
; O. M# B& U2 D. Oavailable for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|