埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 1882|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable : ]8 u; k- D  W4 X1 x: J8 G
9 r8 T; D3 s! {9 w# k
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
+ @1 i* r! _3 J* b. E% m( n$ t, x" ~& c+ j2 L# W& L; D
    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
8 c9 d5 N2 U" J$ G/ }exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
' p7 k* M7 x6 m5 ?8 \( n( W" yquarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
; i( C. K: J$ R: Bin the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
" N5 t! u* y" ^0 B! s0 Mprice gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and3 o( I1 f9 f6 v5 N- S
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,0 ?! r( o: X" ]% B* e. |
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
) s& T  I2 Z1 j6 |4 I- ~LePage Real Estate Services.2 y4 l. X1 m% U6 M. p
$ o" _$ H- \7 W: V+ o% k: j/ w
    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
8 U6 r8 C3 o8 v& S. Eare forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic: Q" B9 S" Y. a1 S6 \" I9 I
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
8 t% w/ i* P7 ~7 J- ~/ esound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the. \; C/ C7 N2 R
residential real estate sector.
* g* _7 b+ g3 |7 S
+ G6 N* u+ E( l& s) W1 Q    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
: o4 v  i/ |" Yoccurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)% Y# c- R: K! g: c9 V/ T
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562) i# J, t4 d' I: X2 B! P' u* r
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380/ m/ k' J, B* [( O+ h) @5 y( A! a( U* J
(+13.2%).8 L- S0 h1 U4 b* K) @
) n; y. E# @  d
    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
# V/ O5 U" j, j0 @" Aduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the8 D+ t# L$ o1 B- a1 C* \
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
  J% Z: G2 R' E! upoised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
6 e+ V! A3 l+ R+ F% Zpresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
% b4 W" p. J* Z+ ]. G0 V0 D1 x* _"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We* W6 d/ s# @; r- B3 ]7 O
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
3 j  W+ O, A# S5 `: I' cbalanced market."
: N* g8 D$ _# a! i' k0 X" `0 p1 l- m: ^: b+ B  x/ N( c! ~8 P
    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
% S, z" ]% V% `2 |6 s! Qconsiderable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
9 C  y: b0 i  I0 `' y, t) qto balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
4 L! y) p, |, w  Gthroughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
" h( [( w3 O) J! O7 f0 {0 ?energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,& E; q$ H: ]3 o* C; |+ G
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record: Y/ k0 w" D7 r# D* ~
breaking price appreciations.) h+ G0 _5 s3 v, W. c4 s- a
/ D5 c9 V' o9 [$ W- q7 c& T( [2 c
    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding) l, A+ Q7 a" Z1 _* T# O& w  F+ l
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the: _0 o; I, ]  I, }  A% `
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.4 e6 d$ A( i" o

; T3 `. s+ U+ f9 c/ b    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
) B4 f8 H3 _5 f7 N1 o+ Feconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer$ p% X- }' K$ u" _) j
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
- P( R3 a( L( H$ ^, e6 b3 P8 `- cslightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
7 i+ z* V4 ~; B) a8 oIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
4 `/ s, c  ~9 F3 q  b( ~% Ogreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
) W9 @  |  ?5 _: ?( ]price appreciation when compared with 2005.3 C) L# c1 c6 a5 W+ k% l

9 L, s# }: V& U$ _5 a$ Z+ x. g    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
* [7 P2 Q9 N) ]; I* O. emarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and; h& q3 F" R3 ?  F+ s2 Y
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada' M' W' Q7 Z1 {% [  g
are markedly different than those found in the United States.
+ \( q' k: {" D; Q) L8 |5 R# `
* [( p; m5 V3 ?2 ]5 U' u    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
; m( R/ F3 t0 v" ?( h5 l" e8 OAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
4 P" [: B9 P5 o$ wfavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the7 [, x  i% }! M) F* {
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general  \' n8 o. {+ j4 e  f
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
. {' {  p6 @/ l9 `: t, d! E, j' jdownside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
8 N- g/ q# N" E; F( L& kaggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
" ?3 \6 n: A- g+ x9 {mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."" Q. x# P9 V& K7 c- a- V4 R5 f

% j) z5 K, Y" z/ F    <<
+ ?# E; O9 K& a+ \1 m- K( W4 h                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES% T. I% ^) s% |  l& a6 H9 ^
    >>3 ^3 V; T8 X/ c

- e* X6 f4 j9 Y4 m; D0 D    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in: |8 `) p8 {/ q8 `1 Y& N% d
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate1 i* T& [2 i4 a% }
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time& F; A- W% Y  T9 Y7 T' T
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
" ~- g& e5 u. W3 s& Crenovations.
. O1 C/ t+ x6 x
% O9 Z1 K% v, b8 K1 |( w    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight" c5 s$ X  N3 P3 I! X; y( O
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation  Q7 ^7 X: N' V. [4 F& A
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and9 H5 s6 {1 }1 H3 G* O/ ]+ m) p3 P' q$ k
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
1 x6 m6 T6 j. m' x
4 q& d! h9 s0 J) [9 ?/ \% w    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
  y, x" \% o8 X/ y5 z) Wslowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the! ?' {, D8 g0 Z& D
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
7 u% ]( x: k" V3 W% G" |& p600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
& |  V0 e, j6 Q6 B! M9 r% d1 f0 Eto the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
" o0 H" u: O7 p. s: P' jand are instead opting for more affordable housing options.9 I8 r2 J$ p* m9 U5 l4 I- @8 Z

+ V# u. L$ z2 L: e" H    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced5 C6 {- o3 i; W6 t
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
/ F5 [( t7 a. y  Y% d4 Ahomes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
4 u* `2 q! \6 B) f8 fwas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian, d0 K% z2 U; X
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
( Q, ]# \3 j, R  ~buyers with more options when looking for a home.
! B# W- i' O9 Z# k& |8 b; W; ?; W) \" u. G" t) f$ U0 J
    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly! o; V0 l$ `% w$ E2 N4 U
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
9 Z  j5 v, n8 R& }priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,7 d* }5 B( f& k+ ?* S4 C
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last" ]$ b+ w' E1 f+ i* D% {
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
; F" X  R2 T. r4 i, T7 d1 C5 J0 ]2 s; D
    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
) _- D) {4 ^$ H0 cprices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
0 Z# Q" V; u* `6 s6 W' ]9 Tlevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting/ ]) w  v) n* r7 n+ [. T/ x
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,# F  D* n7 u0 [+ ]- e8 f0 N) W6 A# A
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the% x' o( _3 l! C1 d
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before! O. ]1 p5 u2 ^) W
making a purchase.7 u9 Y! Q9 U, B/ t' B
7 j8 v0 j3 Y3 F
    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing4 k: I0 Z& ~1 m
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong4 l) t) w; T6 T+ k4 S
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
" L7 m( \1 ~5 O/ m0 h2 u6 acentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
/ D' O0 H  _+ ]7 [1 tattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown) r: x$ b1 A- T, d, T! |/ q
amenities.
$ u4 z) ]& n& i* g9 {
) H) ], X; E% n+ I+ N7 F0 g# q    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
5 A7 o# N8 y- d' [* i1 k( T" Zthroughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand- M: R& g# T' c$ [- Z/ v
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has4 z  K1 g8 H+ G+ B" a$ e. e9 V; P+ @
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been7 l( T" @& [" L' Q+ w& }3 Z
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle& ]! n( p. H2 o: H" o7 D
residence, rather than for investment.
$ `& T1 v& a# h0 O) \$ P/ o  H0 `8 L0 Y+ i. ~# q$ H* H& ~2 p
    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as6 f) t6 u, C6 w1 i8 e
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
# o  j8 b+ X- @9 |: o6 J, Iin a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer/ k) D, k5 X- L/ N6 a2 _
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization; q2 i1 E9 U5 Y, t3 t9 s" ]
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter" z( |0 z8 J0 M
the market.
. b6 L4 \8 p& G$ W: j/ p
0 O# T5 f1 i0 ~    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
+ `9 y& b- A+ V# {2 a% ^July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
0 S3 d0 v+ k* hAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
# a/ a9 {, q3 p* Dmonths, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due- \4 c2 X8 Z* J9 a2 \4 [$ c) @
to the shortage of available inventory.- x- b# c- H4 y0 t! c

3 c' p2 `$ p5 ]  G  I3 P% A    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
$ {' M0 W1 C  W% `$ emomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains% Y0 |8 ?6 J! W) A5 ~! m
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
# N" H+ @! \7 ~" j, }' F. cstruggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
3 U) i1 G0 M0 c* {( F5 M4 r; h+ O6 B: v5 M1 @  |) n7 O
    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases# Y( {0 B6 [+ U; J+ q
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
1 Y* H! O6 A, d* _. b% Wunemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that1 S( D7 h, Y  o, `
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
6 q2 S, P2 k. t9 _" ?prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer" W# O, o! y" Q) k8 ?% R2 A* K
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as2 C: Z8 s2 x" {6 L
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
- q, K- h4 {7 ^& ^5 f
; y% G! t  M+ h, o
    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter, m' q& v9 H8 [* ^% j
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton" ]& q, x: H/ k) A+ C
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,4 C3 _- ^& M% b9 z' B- V
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
8 r- F& [6 p, v7 e% ^" \+ @- vincreasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve, M+ g, V( C- w6 Q, C
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
, M/ O9 X, f. y" z8 _# [towards the end of 2006.
   
6 f. E/ h+ e2 U; k7 A$ m
0 `3 \0 M9 g7 |; Y9 v' eWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of- r, {5 ~5 x$ u2 J0 n4 H' ~
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
3 c. Z: ?7 w6 D1 H3 B4 kto meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
/ }, z0 g0 k, X, jgroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to' {: ?0 K( c; R5 _3 ~, x! N
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
; m3 c3 O# X3 |/ Upressure on tight inventory levels.
( S7 H  X# ~! P) x/ p2 {+ o( @2 |1 E+ V! Z+ k
    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic( E' ^# k; z; y1 x/ o
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
  G5 f* L. x8 K6 T* ointo the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;- k; E. h9 q5 l6 ]4 j9 G
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
  K. z$ H9 o+ x) I  b5 Q0 P. Nfor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
1 y5 e9 c+ u4 `& E
, S1 {. I) f8 I* g& d    <<
2 T+ l. h0 K! r  m2 p! y# J      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006# G% ^3 |6 y) R; w* i, a# ?  ^
! t3 a: x. X8 ^; g4 e
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
: Y. t( M/ C% a) A                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey
( n5 u/ W2 l2 Z7 c# o1 j    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
5 t3 ?! V9 m( `( ]0 l( f- x$ u5 Z                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q33 _6 I* t- I$ @
    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average
/ T  w: E  g2 Q( ~5 T/ U    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
& N9 o3 l% H1 D8 l3 K$ [0 U    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,000
( [: \$ A7 c1 w. N0 p0 e+ k4 U, N    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
9 Y2 g$ f' G" `4 q    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,000
4 L- |* m! ~( T- ^6 a) e6 [& j) [* v% @    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
# g0 A8 ^+ u8 w+ o; p- j    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,000/ c4 C7 s) i2 h. k3 \. ]
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------! O& N$ f6 E9 j6 r
    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -  ~0 m5 Q' J0 m- H
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 \' k5 M# x- p! a% O2 x7 S, [    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,333
' S, N/ z8 L  c- F3 q! Z0 w    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
& A/ w3 A4 g" ~2 R1 [+ I    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,583! ~: p- `8 {- _  b
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 c: z% I. j" f% J( q& G    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,185# U. G1 A* I6 `( ^0 L; }) H
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------3 P7 ^5 Q! s& C5 F# _% y
    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,2507 k2 A1 G' O6 Z3 n
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
! ^% [# e$ i) V4 |    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,766
! T- u  x) T! {) f; X4 U+ C' C  `    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
* y6 n4 _9 F1 i. ?5 E9 f    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,707
( P3 {% S4 p$ p8 `# k    -------------------------------------------------------------------------$ U# Y# g  ]% i
    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,500
; o/ @* s) E0 y) Q/ D    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
9 q5 Y( L4 H9 p6 {- p) I! X3 H' L8 @0 F    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,389
: @0 D/ v8 Z, S9 b2 Y0 X    -------------------------------------------------------------------------; ~; O+ I( O$ z$ s( W; M9 j3 T
    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,714
" a* P" K* n3 O1 ~0 H: x" G8 x* b    -------------------------------------------------------------------------% ]' a2 k- c3 q/ e3 X
    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,500
" T! ^6 n  \1 y+ Q3 _    -------------------------------------------------------------------------  G/ d  Z7 c# Q# t2 P. b+ E! K
    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,000
; }( }$ P  l7 W) f    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 O4 G& D! B8 Q: {7 p    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,860) N2 o0 ^" g! y
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
% f& V+ c+ m5 a
; F2 _' S* q# w' u    -------------------------------------------------------------! x* \! J0 E% p" X+ f0 z
                               Standard Condominium) c/ S1 p6 G8 ~, a3 `# L7 J, B- |8 v
    -------------------------------------------------------------
4 [' a. T) j6 ^, S1 c                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo( z4 a6 a/ ]! P' R  a0 ^! q' u
    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change
. e3 e) E9 v+ X4 J, d    -------------------------------------------------------------  T: y. [- Z! f- @  W
    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%
; I/ l6 Z3 p. F  G, c6 U7 u0 ]    -------------------------------------------------------------0 o, B, i1 I( Q. I; ~$ w3 n# E
    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%
# u: h# ?6 J5 c$ f- ^    -------------------------------------------------------------/ v. W2 {% i+ ?' T$ o% J9 {% f
    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A
% G# s/ m$ E' a! C    -------------------------------------------------------------
7 k7 v- z0 ~1 M" _" y  G& @( o# d    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A% Q+ u+ V1 i$ R& B4 {. b
    -------------------------------------------------------------
/ }* B7 K; V/ E% b: u. W    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%( i4 J; }6 p3 w8 {) R6 u
    -------------------------------------------------------------
  K6 A5 }. X4 u. c* Q3 w9 E6 |2 W    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%
; o1 O+ K$ ^! E    -------------------------------------------------------------1 A8 z2 p* t0 L% x+ y, \( s) ]9 x
    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%0 [9 r1 `& o5 L2 p
    -------------------------------------------------------------$ s* v+ h4 n, Z
    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%
9 q8 m& B2 |* a# I/ q6 s) r: t* I    -------------------------------------------------------------! Y/ E: }: i5 H# r
    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%
3 J# B: w( Y8 Z9 _* g! ~% l( Y    -------------------------------------------------------------3 f( L: W/ g! _( g5 u2 P; b$ W
    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%
) {/ D/ y" E" H' t% ]1 ~    -------------------------------------------------------------8 p$ P2 b4 U& M- R3 d2 p. e& I
    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%! ^3 e3 A2 c5 j) A
    -------------------------------------------------------------
0 A; V7 ^4 N( a2 z7 K$ _3 O7 w    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%
4 J$ b! U) h( S# K- d* q# B1 o8 r- w$ |* O    -------------------------------------------------------------4 O" w; L4 r8 q2 x
    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%) e0 ]* [! m( U2 K* W' M1 b4 @% _
    -------------------------------------------------------------
( @4 V- T" x5 N0 Y. r5 m/ d    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%/ i2 u& l; @  y; r* D
    -------------------------------------------------------------
2 [" c+ i, P7 E& w6 Y) X" C: v    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%
8 r8 H7 n- J; h$ ]    -------------------------------------------------------------2 ]: ]  i8 K7 h
    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%  z2 `, L( V6 U$ W' C% m1 J
    -------------------------------------------------------------
& {: X( U0 W+ u8 y# f1 _# P, b    >>
6 {; q! `8 o3 d3 H" l4 k# w
2 @1 i7 z0 [. \9 R3 i+ F8 f$ ?    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined2 M2 H$ I2 w; Z9 s
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
' t6 `" W8 i& r+ \) S; E- KJohn and Victoria.
: L  N* G, B( L% k" h. {6 F7 H% W7 I0 X
( Q/ D2 y* Z% w! ?8 {: L    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
& |. ]( J1 c# L1 R! icomprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
, c8 ?; T  ], P& D3 F+ }( T0 n7 Lhousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
. P/ n  V& q  h4 O& d+ f% H/ lreferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
% c/ Y# W# D+ @6 m6 Ttrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities# o" u0 d6 n! ^2 l; L
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
9 l8 K& x" D; T! t! \& Navailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current5 a' y% c3 g! E5 V& F  L8 D
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
' M9 E; Y' [+ X3 O- C/ q) d; g& sversion of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
/ B5 n- K# ~2 j; B6 j* ANovember 15, 2006.
7 d, o( Z. |* y! b: c    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
5 w* |4 D1 @, G9 C8 B3 nfair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
- Y9 h* f9 j( T" b! `6 \provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
, ^3 v% y$ I' _+ _available for some areas back to the early 1970s.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2025-9-13 00:35 , Processed in 0.090456 second(s), 9 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表