 鲜花( 5)  鸡蛋( 6)
|
本帖最后由 bigsnail 于 2012-6-7 11:17 编辑
2 `- B* G9 [6 { Q, r+ w! Y- z E7 t! `' R/ ~( I7 R4 V
open your mouth and wash it with detergent
/ O- T$ H- Z9 `$ x3 X
1 t) A6 I' e0 x( \6 ]sure there is no rigorous statistical evidence because there is no way to manipulate in the experiment so as to fully justify the causality. e( f* K: y" L! Z. k
5 g2 K7 R: a3 _6 z2 m+ wAnd remember: 9 [3 [& k1 x# R2 N: Y$ S, p% o! {
"there is no evidence that A holds"
6 L7 J9 k( L$ [" d$ I0 x" {% Idoes NOT mean 8 y1 X" T- w- j; H) D/ g
"there is evident that A does not hold". % c1 X: V# g: H6 I% _2 o% b
In fact, A could hold.
6 h5 ~7 B" Z+ y, u$ yIt's a matter like observability vs objective existence.
9 v: q3 O7 J% t0 RSo what you say doesn't constitute a refutation.
7 s" o9 {/ I6 ~: I2 ^! I t. e1 T% x/ R$ l; [4 R) q: e n
It's mainly by argumentation. See for example: {+ m& A6 t7 H' e% ^
, a3 Z2 g& ~! m9 M& k
"Does the death penalty cost less than life in prison without parole?" w! G# w) N6 y& w9 j* v* H
in
+ Z3 n5 s% \4 l2 O' Hhttp://deathpenalty.procon.org/view.answers.php?questionID=0010000 j0 T' ?! f$ {9 t& d; p
2 ^& y; ]5 k: m1 B! ~4 ]2 [
Remember, things are more complicated than what you think.2 e6 K5 V" U, Z1 b) B
|
|
楼主: weidsun
狗仔卡
发表于 2012-6-6 21:15
显身卡
楼主
发表于 2012-6-7 14:59
