I would like to see more Debate, not Fight. Debate for fun, fight to get a headache8 |! x3 V# t6 R, E: V2 Q+ h; P
% ?7 [! R ^- \) `, t
Calm down everyone please. 7 C3 N: q; J; a" I/ p * I& Q/ E) K T( S不存在 can mean two different things: 9 @, |) B7 V, z/ s: J + ?4 e9 ^/ {! Z1: 不存在 (not yet). Such as a house before construction etc. ) ]+ `1 P) p. U2 Y( V$ y2: 不存在 (never exist) such as 上帝都不能举起的石头 * c7 T$ t0 m* b" S ( v: P3 ^4 z. d; C6 {' s* T6 P) mI assumed that dora's 不存在 meant never exist9 l& N+ k9 R/ s$ ?
原帖由 eastroster 于 2006-6-8 03:13 发表/ T& w6 S& \& L1 x; c3 o
I would like to see more Debate, not Fight. Debate for fun, fight to get a headache ) Z6 \/ _9 z7 W8 a6 B1 q+ ] % v3 e& E! Z7 j9 y. t5 D% DCalm down everyone please. 5 g( g8 A. h9 p: `+ A" {5 l8 d% `( ? _' n
不存在 can mean two different things:! Q9 m& e) v, t$ l
' j( h- W+ }8 G, `1 ?0 g1: 不存在 (not yet). Such as a house before construction etc.1 }4 y( x5 |6 M3 o/ \
2: 不存在 (never exist) such as 上帝都不能举起的石头 8 P# T& l9 i8 J. q" Q( G% Y3 U- K( o8 D9 P3 t6 b( r8 w8 t( G
I assumed that dora's 不存在 meant never exist ...
2 |& v3 a' J# u, P
' z3 [! C' n2 a }- `
小铜子,, 你的1和2根本不是对立关系.. 1并不能否定2. 1只能refer to current state, 2 refer to past state,过去没有,, 现在没有,, 将来就一定没有吗/?/? 上帝的无所不能不应该体现在能创造将来吗/? 她根本不能自圆其说.
原帖由 ︶ㄣ|._紸禵麯゛ 于 2006-6-8 13:19 发表* [! t9 _! A' i8 { A, ?
balubalu,别人跟大家分享自己的宗教信仰关你屁事啊!- F2 c, S0 ?+ I3 B1 r# O
你不赞成你就自己去信你自己那个什么狗屎balu教。 / Y4 d6 Z. F2 H你妈的。。。自己滚回老家去吃屎。乱七八糟吐一堆屎。 3 l* t2 f7 ^5 S: B别人的意见不需要你来评价,你是什么?你以为你是 ...
: s" w. r! Z$ c: E( B : J# ^1 Z. \. [' _, u) B3 YDid your GOD ask you to curse people this way? - E, ?9 x6 F6 u* X9 l7 V$ n+ w1 ^% C( AIf you really have a 宗教信仰, I believe your GOD will shame on you!
. R. S0 y5 K/ \0 E' ? q
# a; k z" x, o/ d' P
Arguments on religious believes always turn out to become very emotional (if not violent). It has been like that for hundreds of years (if not thousands of years) 5 q& N, F( X" j* y& g8 ` 2 o& K @' C' D2 G" W. m5 [; E6 P+ eMaybe we should stop argument. 4 W3 z- n: z3 g L& M" T8 ]! G0 k/ D3 q$ U
My commoent " Dora's 逻辑 is correct " was with the view point of logistics instead of religion8 z0 `* B, N6 o0 F) a, w
6 v3 l4 s, s( l `
[ 本帖最后由 eastroster 于 2006-6-8 11:28 编辑 ]