 鲜花( 13)  鸡蛋( 1)
|
........." we have heard of customers who have heard or
, j! I+ X+ |: N/ ]2 g7 Wread on the internet that Basa& O/ u; ?2 A1 T+ ~- H0 g
is a contaminated fish& V+ `3 [8 f, k# _8 e
, with particular emphasis on mercury
3 \ E& k2 \- C7 o1 P$ \0 f. We
3 `- h3 b/ n. _6 a; S% `4 G8 Ghave looked into this and it is our belief these rumours are completely untrue and may
! |' S. P8 F! A. V Feven7 r! A, B4 {. j X# t: }7 e8 H
find5 G0 n+ M3 o7 V% M/ t2 O2 z1 z1 B+ G/ o
their origin in a long running trade dispute.
. K2 E# I- _) `2 v, D1 jThe CFIA( m, [7 e' X: J- n. _7 c' b
monitors all fish imports carefully, a- m, ?3 C$ `$ |* b* u
nd inspect+ v& W8 i/ \; }0 j/ X7 N- b
all new importers and new species
9 p( y/ Z! V* q' I: S# {/ {without fail. Ongoing shipments of seafood are inspected regularly, but less often7 G( A* E5 g/ E7 l
once they have
: B! Z, E4 t! ^0 m+ z) b Lproved safe" o) A/ ~0 i" j1 f2 h C
. These inspections cover a wide range of potential contaminants, both natural and
( N3 x% ^8 R( \* k) |5 ~those that may be- K+ w. ?5 S( }$ L& _* G
introduced in the production process.1 _6 ]' v+ D, V" P. B
If customers are wondering about the Basa, it is suggested you answer3 a6 v6 x) U+ F1 ~, {. _
something like this; “Our Basa has been tested and meets the Canadian( k2 W6 G; i/ m5 a4 c$ `8 h6 V
Food Inspection Standards in all regards. There have been things posted5 r3 t" F" ~* X# @% `( C8 a
on th3 g: `$ @( s! }9 f" x: Z9 H
e internet saying it may be contaminated with mercury but ongoing! f4 L9 [+ v: v- s$ _, s k
testing has proved those to be completely false. Basa is safe.” You may* n8 s0 G. s1 s+ `& h& A
even direct customers to the Health Canada and CFIA website if they
! f; ?* b- n, [1 b! mwould like to research this more.2 ]6 q6 L l# Z- d J3 w/ E. ?" [
We have
/ F. B2 Y8 M2 I8 \review
5 \+ h% w! s9 c4 zed5 D. k. E6 _# _
the CFIA website about the wide range of chemicals, metals, drugs, and
, T) U; N$ Z/ bcontaminants that are tested for.
2 M5 K: b' |: J0 P# x+ o9 ~We have also
/ o! G7 ^: M/ D5 k- o; Preceived a test report from our importer which. | @8 M I/ B: O) g, l) u8 z
shows that our Basa meets CFIA guidelines
- I$ Y X( D6 ]: y& ^/ H, Y.
: e* M. c5 G3 l% m* _3 y, iBelow, please find3 ~/ c) p1 H1 x, I; k
copied
. x' J2 O* D9 M+ isections9 u4 X1 d3 ? u$ n3 g. H3 }
of the Health Canada website9 q- _! X% ]- P2 [. U R
that should put this completely
. ]8 {& X* b" u/ P1 k5 {' e& Kto rest. The first section talks generally about where mercury is typically found. Basa is
7 Q- P" p; _' [; j1 Nnot+ J4 v( R& S2 B
a
1 O& d$ {* o, c' O" {long lived fish
) i- J" F. u( L4 j! Wand is near the bottom of the food chain- D: q A5 P: c7 U4 b2 F/ W
so seems unlikely to be1 |+ w; S9 E) K9 o0 b( C
contaminated
3 j P B: b. E# p% S( g* hwit
6 n# w! z: N5 D/ a( {( m- `h mercury2 d% a- {, U% F
.
. F! o6 V0 _- i* s9 N3 J4 f% M8 K3 LThe second section summarizes the mercury content# B+ p% C; z0 k& s
actually found in testing/ g, j. h) G E( z
in a
% n7 ]$ x" O4 k" Kwide variety of fish+ W; C6 l! K1 i8 h+ W% T: \
," ~. M2 n5 M/ b& k& F6 ^) E/ O h
and Basa is at or below the .02 threshold that was used to show low
O. Y/ L/ V9 f/ v/ {concentrations (it; u, O+ {7 e) o0 C# e
'. T% z: B5 l. e4 q$ M) M
s about 3 pages long so I only copied the top section9 U0 K ]* n9 w
contain4 G$ k. {0 F1 i& }; p/ p: `3 N+ e
ing B
& w/ j( \+ i( Oasa). Over
7 Z7 p, T E$ t. z% }( J/ d: ^, }.05 is the regulated level where it is considered important to advise on consumption limits. If you
& o8 w" T6 n5 a8 Z& @7 X) z! [want to know more I have included the link
4 G- a2 u( T/ J+ ^s
3 x; o3 C7 m) _, {, sto where this info is found.) \* y8 B, s) v( q" A
http://www.inspection.gc.ca/engl ... /import/inspe.shtml" }/ `/ c* O" s: a$ K0 f/ r
http://www.hc
* k- I- K5 y) h. D- ] K-
( T. y% y& A/ O: y+ |6 bsc.gc.ca/fn
) l' j* Y4 k: z$ a-
" g' Z: w* ?4 Ian/alt_formats/hpfb
+ W# Z6 Y& e7 r4 l-
' O$ L8 R8 J6 \5 ?# @! B: Qdgpsa/pdf/nutr0 H/ c2 i0 @0 k1 Y
ition/merc_fish_poisson
3 Y; H" A' `- }) C% {- j) } q, k4 x
eng.pdf |
|