 鲜花( 2)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Memorandum D6-2-6Refund of Duties and Taxes on Non-Commercial Importations& X) h' w# u/ A8 ~
上面说 非商业 进口 可以免关税?' F3 _ P: I7 ]) v, F
5 o' l) b; L. e9 `! E
& K T+ D* d2 p( ~9 l! J9 E
: F) p5 f4 t. L& p* Vhttp://www.cbsa-asfc.gc.ca/publications/forms-formulaires/b2g.pdf: r, { u" o; h
2 e' s" t2 B! J3 f2 R& o/ X
8 z3 w. u @3 X1 {1 iRefund Requests/ `) b p/ s3 w
74. (1) Subject to this section, section 75 and any regulations made under section 81, a person who
5 ^5 s* t6 K) A1 C) P# T8 U0 Epaid duties on any imported goods may, in accordance with subsection (3), apply for a refund of all or part
( O& w$ A/ `5 C' v0 H9 e$ Vof those duties, and the Minister may grant to that person a refund of all or part of those duties, if
2 t0 ?6 U( m8 |+ r# C1 S' O: t( F(a) they have suffered damage, deterioration or destruction at any time from the time of shipment to, v# ]' D: t6 ~9 O" l0 O% ?
Canada to the time of release;
- N1 ^5 r9 u$ m(b) the quantity released is less than the quantity in respect of which duties were paid;/ O/ o! P0 W, G$ `7 v, z
(c) they are of a quality inferior to that in respect of which duties were paid;4 D6 E1 f4 R9 r7 d* [
(c.1) the goods were exported from a NAFTA country or from Chile but no claim for preferential
9 W; f7 t$ c2 E5 Y, M# P* Xtariff treatment under NAFTA or no claim for preferential tariff treatment under the CCFTA, as the z- t: l' _% U/ K
case may be, was made in respect of those goods at the time they were accounted for under3 O9 h! C0 @9 M' o- D
subsection 32(1), (3) or (5);1 k2 q" |0 W3 t& J+ @. K. ?
3
* o( T( D, k' P6 p5 _- R(c.11) the goods were imported from Israel or another CIFTA beneficiary but no claim for
$ U, Q; N8 b7 opreferential tariff treatment under CIFTA was made in respect of those goods at the time they are
k9 X3 M' o* `* l$ Vaccounted for under subsection 32(1), (3) or (5);
5 G3 B% u& D, J F* f1 R(d) the calculation of duties owing was based on a clerical, typographical or similar error;. d# F/ N) `) d: `' ` v0 j5 e
(e) the duties were paid or overpaid as a result of an error in the determination under subsection 58(2)
( G: J2 D& X4 O8 b' Q4 _of origin (other than in the circumstances described in paragraph (c.1) or (c.11), tariff classification or! Q8 ?9 g( u7 L/ {: l1 \8 |
value for duty in respect of the goods and the determination has not been the subject of a decision
6 X0 z" ^( q/ T/ R0 Q/ j/ i5 F- Dunder any of sections 59 to 61;
5 r% b/ h6 c0 z: F" _5 z# v(f) [not applicable to non-commercial goods];
* W; D3 Q6 b5 B(g) the duties were overpaid or paid in error for any reason that may be prescribed.3 g# O# W& p7 `( c" |+ p
(1.1) The granting of a refund under paragraph (1) (c.1), (c.11), or (e) or (f), if the refund is based
1 Z/ d, K; L! I hon tariff classification, value for duty or origin under paragraph (1)(g) is to be treated for the purposes of' F8 H5 q, a5 P" f* `. T# T' l
this Act, other than section 66, as if it were a re-determination made under paragraph 59 (1)(a).3 {; r9 E: b7 E# p5 H- D: m
(2) No refund shall be granted under any of the paragraphs 1(a) to (c) and (d) in respect of a claim
9 ?* k5 ]- U: I5 M! bunless written notice of the claim and the reason for it is given to an officer within the prescribed time.
1 z( |+ u9 z5 M% |2 i2 y$ @(3) No refund shall be granted under subsection (1) in respect of a claim unless* ?1 f& p$ ]1 p
(a) the person making the claim affords an officer reasonable opportunity to examine the goods in3 O# g' N& k: b9 B
respect of which the claim is made or otherwise verify the reason for the claim; and
' ^% c' I" b5 @% _(b) an application for the refund, including such evidence in support of the application as may be
( e: Z$ Q5 e& y2 O, G1 l& k- @prescribed, is made to an officer in the prescribed manner and in the prescribed form containing the; _8 {7 m8 a! O4 v+ Q+ X
prescribed information within
+ P4 W# I# m& h5 I+ w2 i5 {(i) in the case of an application for a refund under paragraph (1)(a), (b), (c), (c.11), (d), (e), (f)
9 }+ p0 c# f( ior (g), four years after the goods are accounted for under subsection 32 (1), (3) or (5), and1 A6 S0 N9 ~" H* Y1 h5 a/ r
(ii) in the case of an application for a refund under paragraph (1)(c.1), one year after the goods; ~" }0 p) A; r8 H# a7 y
were accounted for under subsection 32(1), (3) or (5) or such longer period as may be prescribed.1 Z# [* B0 N2 |2 t4 o7 t5 @+ e
(4) A denial of an application for a refund of duties paid on goods is to be treated for the purposes of6 Z/ B; \+ J. a i3 n& e0 m: |
this Act as if it were a re-determination under paragraph 59(1)(a) if8 F+ e# s$ \7 T2 O5 ]; P
(a) the application is for a refund under paragraph (1)(c.1) or (c.11) and the application is denied
7 _% w7 Y! H ~3 obecause at the time the goods were accounted for under subsection 32(1), (3) or (5), they were not' {) I7 z9 X; C2 L0 n) t6 S
eligible for preferential tariff treatment under a free trade agreement; or* p: h8 t5 k1 A1 {
(b) the application is for a refund under paragraph (1)(e), (f) or (g) and the application is denied
2 T) E, O$ ~+ M: b( w, c" U1 Nbecause the origin, tariff classification or value for duty of the goods as claimed in the application is) x; Q( n8 C* n5 F6 i+ c+ \
incorrect.* [+ x8 o. a3 r) Z `# W9 l
(5) For greater certainty, a denial of an application for a refund under paragraph (1)(c.1), (c.11), (e),8 O! Y% g( q" Y, x6 x
(f) or (g) on the basis that complete or accurate documentation has not been provided, or on any ground
1 q4 ^9 D3 _# s0 C1 k3 Y$ Z+ J; v0 bother than the ground specified in subsection (4), is not to be treated for the purposes of this Act as if it
9 _( V7 T R9 p* B$ }were a re-determination under this Act of origin, tariff classification or value for duty.
, v7 B: ^+ G5 D6 C7 x' f I6 x- [6 t% T, a ?0 n
这到底是说可以还是不可以啊? |
|