埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2720|回复: 0

关于 邮购是否免税的问题 退税表 D6-2-6

[复制链接]
鲜花(2) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2011-9-29 22:42 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Memorandum D6-2-6Refund of Duties and Taxes on Non-Commercial Importations$ l  q: @* F" e2 ^% L
上面说 非商业 进口 可以免关税?% U1 x8 M3 f- F# v% |9 v) j+ C

. `; g) w9 u3 {- n9 s# ]9 t* m
( C/ P/ P# s7 |: D+ j

) K6 ~% ^2 g. b  Xhttp://www.cbsa-asfc.gc.ca/publications/forms-formulaires/b2g.pdf7 H& ]! e1 R# T4 _) G5 M  I1 t
6 U2 c* C1 F0 n# Q, ?' J7 p
/ I2 S0 A$ h$ b9 t
Refund Requests
, ]. z. s  J7 X* ]1 T5 n& o74. (1) Subject to this section, section 75 and any regulations made under section 81, a person who
! @8 N8 N4 A! L+ @paid duties on any imported goods may, in accordance with subsection (3), apply for a refund of all or part
- |, R' {% o' e+ Y+ P# k% R, B7 [of those duties, and the Minister may grant to that person a refund of all or part of those duties, if( y4 v1 P0 w* d! h
(a) they have suffered damage, deterioration or destruction at any time from the time of shipment to0 b' S5 Y& ~( H" i: y
Canada to the time of release;4 P3 E6 I' _& U" X
(b) the quantity released is less than the quantity in respect of which duties were paid;. i5 n4 J, i7 |/ y  u0 \
(c) they are of a quality inferior to that in respect of which duties were paid;
$ T4 L2 u# [% b  i(c.1) the goods were exported from a NAFTA country or from Chile but no claim for preferential
1 B2 x4 P* ], htariff treatment under NAFTA or no claim for preferential tariff treatment under the CCFTA, as the7 v4 x' U9 r9 q1 H& M
case may be, was made in respect of those goods at the time they were accounted for under4 ]: E) q: r" Q* w6 y
subsection 32(1), (3) or (5);
1 I0 U) `' w1 z; U3( D+ x  [8 W# Q& n8 \) h2 b
(c.11) the goods were imported from Israel or another CIFTA beneficiary but no claim for& M: O# m1 l' t. L& z
preferential tariff treatment under CIFTA was made in respect of those goods at the time they are
" r9 [* }# S# d" Jaccounted for under subsection 32(1), (3) or (5);
* R4 \0 S- V' E% n- \5 ?(d) the calculation of duties owing was based on a clerical, typographical or similar error;
; k6 v$ ?) ?- J* J$ }; m# N  m% C, h(e) the duties were paid or overpaid as a result of an error in the determination under subsection 58(2)8 M3 O! S9 L% I7 W, v
of origin (other than in the circumstances described in paragraph (c.1) or (c.11), tariff classification or* L/ X% s( z0 Z
value for duty in respect of the goods and the determination has not been the subject of a decision/ y0 R5 D% D& w! L
under any of sections 59 to 61;9 T1 k' A2 a0 a/ Y( p% \
(f) [not applicable to non-commercial goods];
2 k3 I- w; Y$ E3 n& h7 k(g) the duties were overpaid or paid in error for any reason that may be prescribed.
6 N* ?( H/ g# Z' w% z% _/ R(1.1) The granting of a refund under paragraph (1) (c.1), (c.11), or (e) or (f), if the refund is based& i: c: k+ h; T- E( B# ]
on tariff classification, value for duty or origin under paragraph (1)(g) is to be treated for the purposes of) L4 M. |1 s. @2 D  B6 h
this Act, other than section 66, as if it were a re-determination made under paragraph 59 (1)(a).% p9 A5 K' ?( G
(2) No refund shall be granted under any of the paragraphs 1(a) to (c) and (d) in respect of a claim
" J8 L, q! P# c0 @unless written notice of the claim and the reason for it is given to an officer within the prescribed time.
* J5 ?! v3 d8 @; {& _2 ]& x: ]) v(3) No refund shall be granted under subsection (1) in respect of a claim unless
3 B7 |1 n4 B  {/ `(a) the person making the claim affords an officer reasonable opportunity to examine the goods in
8 D8 p2 L4 t7 prespect of which the claim is made or otherwise verify the reason for the claim; and
; L! Z- `; w4 D. t( B(b) an application for the refund, including such evidence in support of the application as may be
6 j) F8 Z' w, q0 kprescribed, is made to an officer in the prescribed manner and in the prescribed form containing the
4 q$ ^9 Z6 e( @/ tprescribed information within: e) H: Y6 R" s, j
(i) in the case of an application for a refund under paragraph (1)(a), (b), (c), (c.11), (d), (e), (f)
) N$ `* S6 l  b$ ?) ^or (g), four years after the goods are accounted for under subsection 32 (1), (3) or (5), and
  J! ]& b$ I2 r9 W  s(ii) in the case of an application for a refund under paragraph (1)(c.1), one year after the goods/ `* B* L5 F: C& P7 f
were accounted for under subsection 32(1), (3) or (5) or such longer period as may be prescribed./ o/ H' n4 i' {) v! n" J9 V' l
(4) A denial of an application for a refund of duties paid on goods is to be treated for the purposes of
7 O  a( a' ~: ~7 `" m1 x4 bthis Act as if it were a re-determination under paragraph 59(1)(a) if
" v) B( ?3 Q( w. A% Q+ A4 W(a) the application is for a refund under paragraph (1)(c.1) or (c.11) and the application is denied
3 r& D7 Z% L1 P9 X; V2 W( Fbecause at the time the goods were accounted for under subsection 32(1), (3) or (5), they were not& E6 X/ F4 P& V) s* m
eligible for preferential tariff treatment under a free trade agreement; or1 X" a( N+ l/ B
(b) the application is for a refund under paragraph (1)(e), (f) or (g) and the application is denied  h. K1 F' S# B$ l4 W
because the origin, tariff classification or value for duty of the goods as claimed in the application is
8 c" F; C& |$ W/ tincorrect.0 J1 E7 D( b8 k
(5) For greater certainty, a denial of an application for a refund under paragraph (1)(c.1), (c.11), (e),0 ~# }* X) S$ m& u
(f) or (g) on the basis that complete or accurate documentation has not been provided, or on any ground
, X$ Z8 f& h- S5 e7 aother than the ground specified in subsection (4), is not to be treated for the purposes of this Act as if it8 ?  f  o6 [9 d/ B7 M3 E, C
were a re-determination under this Act of origin, tariff classification or value for duty.
9 s) `) L9 t3 P& _9 W7 t/ v/ r" U  X! L) z6 B
这到底是说可以还是不可以啊?
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-5-30 14:51 , Processed in 0.221208 second(s), 9 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表