 鲜花( 2)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Memorandum D6-2-6Refund of Duties and Taxes on Non-Commercial Importations
- V* a. h) D5 t7 \3 J1 I* f+ f上面说 非商业 进口 可以免关税?( a# k0 {7 i! Q5 J
1 N1 Z4 P8 X, [% V0 T) w( D {1 f( Q" h; `. _: u2 v+ [. [
) a) S; y. H a7 ?( T' Ahttp://www.cbsa-asfc.gc.ca/publications/forms-formulaires/b2g.pdf
; i. L( h6 u! s
/ x; ]. `: c, ^1 ]' h, Q- T
- x7 c9 L0 R1 q7 ?+ y0 HRefund Requests3 q* k% l( v4 m4 c9 ~2 j7 t
74. (1) Subject to this section, section 75 and any regulations made under section 81, a person who6 {, M: b5 r" l5 c
paid duties on any imported goods may, in accordance with subsection (3), apply for a refund of all or part7 l( h' E* Q9 ~0 i1 n0 K
of those duties, and the Minister may grant to that person a refund of all or part of those duties, if' e+ ]2 u! Q3 a
(a) they have suffered damage, deterioration or destruction at any time from the time of shipment to
, F, R8 f8 D( O' c, v2 dCanada to the time of release;
' R/ ^+ b& u T4 k$ L3 t! l(b) the quantity released is less than the quantity in respect of which duties were paid;0 _% x- Y8 }8 k6 L/ G
(c) they are of a quality inferior to that in respect of which duties were paid; I+ h* |, j, w" l( z! x' {) B
(c.1) the goods were exported from a NAFTA country or from Chile but no claim for preferential! Z3 z' k2 b, H- I0 Z) t
tariff treatment under NAFTA or no claim for preferential tariff treatment under the CCFTA, as the: N$ f3 d; f- z+ b. t
case may be, was made in respect of those goods at the time they were accounted for under. j0 i. ~3 w8 Q D. T; l: k
subsection 32(1), (3) or (5);
! B5 S0 V \! E, w4 Y3, }* [. u: G, C8 q; ^" j
(c.11) the goods were imported from Israel or another CIFTA beneficiary but no claim for, `4 M& T- I7 n- |2 {7 c7 \
preferential tariff treatment under CIFTA was made in respect of those goods at the time they are
/ T0 h* E n1 C! b4 L4 Y caccounted for under subsection 32(1), (3) or (5);
/ `2 Z' G9 e3 [( w(d) the calculation of duties owing was based on a clerical, typographical or similar error;
1 @! {; `. u7 c. D- W(e) the duties were paid or overpaid as a result of an error in the determination under subsection 58(2), ~* |2 ?7 l$ H6 V$ \! `5 S
of origin (other than in the circumstances described in paragraph (c.1) or (c.11), tariff classification or1 p X% N4 m$ r% B8 Y- P |. {
value for duty in respect of the goods and the determination has not been the subject of a decision
- G) z C2 n8 k2 C6 O- xunder any of sections 59 to 61;- t. M$ E$ U! E
(f) [not applicable to non-commercial goods];3 h6 Z% {+ q( P; u+ M
(g) the duties were overpaid or paid in error for any reason that may be prescribed., S X0 t0 z3 O& L. G0 O# `7 ] N
(1.1) The granting of a refund under paragraph (1) (c.1), (c.11), or (e) or (f), if the refund is based
8 m! J, i8 l1 M/ l) P, bon tariff classification, value for duty or origin under paragraph (1)(g) is to be treated for the purposes of
4 i' P" Q7 s, G" c1 jthis Act, other than section 66, as if it were a re-determination made under paragraph 59 (1)(a).
/ [2 y- R; T7 E4 s, a0 A/ f& X(2) No refund shall be granted under any of the paragraphs 1(a) to (c) and (d) in respect of a claim
' y4 m% }# ~8 ~8 o; Q) {unless written notice of the claim and the reason for it is given to an officer within the prescribed time.
6 t1 i$ `9 J8 M9 X& l(3) No refund shall be granted under subsection (1) in respect of a claim unless
, M K8 S8 B. W6 |* ~, N/ h0 d(a) the person making the claim affords an officer reasonable opportunity to examine the goods in
0 z; D: ~: Z9 }respect of which the claim is made or otherwise verify the reason for the claim; and
/ x2 F/ }: T! Y6 f6 `(b) an application for the refund, including such evidence in support of the application as may be, l) ^; l( ]8 j
prescribed, is made to an officer in the prescribed manner and in the prescribed form containing the
4 G! U9 }- E7 Z/ S- fprescribed information within
9 e p9 Z: Z! R/ V2 f(i) in the case of an application for a refund under paragraph (1)(a), (b), (c), (c.11), (d), (e), (f)
# m4 H' |$ F, @7 | P! For (g), four years after the goods are accounted for under subsection 32 (1), (3) or (5), and- p3 |% S4 ]& d4 T" h, N3 C, |& ?
(ii) in the case of an application for a refund under paragraph (1)(c.1), one year after the goods! u$ y6 i, z9 C4 x3 g
were accounted for under subsection 32(1), (3) or (5) or such longer period as may be prescribed.& M9 [: n6 ]$ ?9 T J6 H1 a& ~
(4) A denial of an application for a refund of duties paid on goods is to be treated for the purposes of( E# z' |+ b+ h k+ ^* G! }) `
this Act as if it were a re-determination under paragraph 59(1)(a) if
, H$ n- u' B7 ]. c(a) the application is for a refund under paragraph (1)(c.1) or (c.11) and the application is denied( ~' a8 p2 |. G: l S
because at the time the goods were accounted for under subsection 32(1), (3) or (5), they were not+ w" M7 v# I9 Y
eligible for preferential tariff treatment under a free trade agreement; or" t: L/ B- E7 m. m5 r" ?
(b) the application is for a refund under paragraph (1)(e), (f) or (g) and the application is denied$ d+ c/ ^$ b, [8 N M
because the origin, tariff classification or value for duty of the goods as claimed in the application is5 V* z& S- _* q
incorrect.
$ q9 u! B( x& }9 v(5) For greater certainty, a denial of an application for a refund under paragraph (1)(c.1), (c.11), (e),
- ?8 V9 q1 P* d9 B( b9 m2 H(f) or (g) on the basis that complete or accurate documentation has not been provided, or on any ground+ c+ a4 S1 L3 E' P. x8 C0 R( X
other than the ground specified in subsection (4), is not to be treated for the purposes of this Act as if it
1 _' ^; @- ?) a2 q4 }5 rwere a re-determination under this Act of origin, tariff classification or value for duty.' |, G- s% C2 c" G
# z2 Y4 Y* w6 T- j6 X+ t
这到底是说可以还是不可以啊? |
|