 鲜花( 2)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Memorandum D6-2-6Refund of Duties and Taxes on Non-Commercial Importations2 f+ A% `$ v/ Z1 T5 |
上面说 非商业 进口 可以免关税?
! O1 ?. E7 W3 w. f: i( j% Y/ `% W
+ I: _; F4 `3 P9 F9 C1 f
# F8 G* N! j& T9 Shttp://www.cbsa-asfc.gc.ca/publications/forms-formulaires/b2g.pdf7 X2 m2 c6 ]! H( O: n
B0 `1 X; ^) P3 W5 `' q; {
4 c, d5 i9 U1 uRefund Requests/ h$ P% Q5 L- x* w3 G
74. (1) Subject to this section, section 75 and any regulations made under section 81, a person who
# J z! D) i. |4 r1 x8 p! Y- {& Zpaid duties on any imported goods may, in accordance with subsection (3), apply for a refund of all or part
0 h. Q. J9 t$ h& A; U9 @& l4 k: ~# yof those duties, and the Minister may grant to that person a refund of all or part of those duties, if z- i, @- \) L1 {0 u
(a) they have suffered damage, deterioration or destruction at any time from the time of shipment to$ Y# X( V' A9 a2 m- Q; f
Canada to the time of release;
" c: n' i: S) W; g2 Y& P(b) the quantity released is less than the quantity in respect of which duties were paid;
: Y( i' M" r- x$ U& I(c) they are of a quality inferior to that in respect of which duties were paid;
; E3 I, z8 b3 f(c.1) the goods were exported from a NAFTA country or from Chile but no claim for preferential
8 S1 i1 x8 `5 X7 Q7 o$ ]tariff treatment under NAFTA or no claim for preferential tariff treatment under the CCFTA, as the2 J' l& i- v0 \
case may be, was made in respect of those goods at the time they were accounted for under
; z- C$ ^8 b$ m0 f s, V/ psubsection 32(1), (3) or (5);# L4 s" g& ^. L, e: N8 `
3# l6 V2 L6 _- d2 ?8 @
(c.11) the goods were imported from Israel or another CIFTA beneficiary but no claim for5 a& d- ]9 Q7 |7 G& f
preferential tariff treatment under CIFTA was made in respect of those goods at the time they are
1 i* x! ?2 ]0 {7 M( r! E& Vaccounted for under subsection 32(1), (3) or (5);
- N6 F& F: R2 |2 Q; y) x(d) the calculation of duties owing was based on a clerical, typographical or similar error; `4 u" n) \7 J- {3 @: K& C4 n
(e) the duties were paid or overpaid as a result of an error in the determination under subsection 58(2)1 e2 T7 S0 G5 j$ y: Z# H; L
of origin (other than in the circumstances described in paragraph (c.1) or (c.11), tariff classification or
8 z+ Z& d, h: O! Y7 P8 kvalue for duty in respect of the goods and the determination has not been the subject of a decision
0 B8 X. M5 |( `% l6 junder any of sections 59 to 61;
6 g. g% f# Z% p6 o(f) [not applicable to non-commercial goods];
5 J7 _* B9 Q$ u9 @7 B(g) the duties were overpaid or paid in error for any reason that may be prescribed.
( @8 _. y0 {4 D; \(1.1) The granting of a refund under paragraph (1) (c.1), (c.11), or (e) or (f), if the refund is based
7 U/ B3 h5 L1 e9 ^/ T' ~on tariff classification, value for duty or origin under paragraph (1)(g) is to be treated for the purposes of" B% k; a v/ S7 U( r' ^
this Act, other than section 66, as if it were a re-determination made under paragraph 59 (1)(a).
7 j, H$ }/ g# \$ d5 S(2) No refund shall be granted under any of the paragraphs 1(a) to (c) and (d) in respect of a claim
' M5 D' U$ z( i: hunless written notice of the claim and the reason for it is given to an officer within the prescribed time.$ ^- X- S1 `" j0 ^
(3) No refund shall be granted under subsection (1) in respect of a claim unless
( l/ s7 B' z$ S4 R9 d(a) the person making the claim affords an officer reasonable opportunity to examine the goods in$ \/ [9 \( e# ^+ w5 |! j0 c6 b" p
respect of which the claim is made or otherwise verify the reason for the claim; and8 z- S- y& _0 q, m) U6 c" s8 y
(b) an application for the refund, including such evidence in support of the application as may be f$ r# W5 T* o9 T4 e6 C& x: Z
prescribed, is made to an officer in the prescribed manner and in the prescribed form containing the6 D" @! l8 E; I& l8 T
prescribed information within
" K3 p ?$ T7 z(i) in the case of an application for a refund under paragraph (1)(a), (b), (c), (c.11), (d), (e), (f)
% F6 Q& P( X7 [* l: ?or (g), four years after the goods are accounted for under subsection 32 (1), (3) or (5), and
1 L1 N2 w F' @5 c(ii) in the case of an application for a refund under paragraph (1)(c.1), one year after the goods
5 [: X6 t. e9 q: rwere accounted for under subsection 32(1), (3) or (5) or such longer period as may be prescribed.: x" w: T w8 X. @
(4) A denial of an application for a refund of duties paid on goods is to be treated for the purposes of5 Q* M2 @' _6 ~+ U! m5 g
this Act as if it were a re-determination under paragraph 59(1)(a) if
) K, t! R, b7 y/ c& d(a) the application is for a refund under paragraph (1)(c.1) or (c.11) and the application is denied
0 K1 h P: \. ^1 I2 Pbecause at the time the goods were accounted for under subsection 32(1), (3) or (5), they were not
- B, v" {' @) R# G& H* ]9 Heligible for preferential tariff treatment under a free trade agreement; or
' ]/ s- Q: m; D6 X(b) the application is for a refund under paragraph (1)(e), (f) or (g) and the application is denied
% B/ J6 j4 D# }because the origin, tariff classification or value for duty of the goods as claimed in the application is- M7 a+ t, B- l* `, ?1 a: r
incorrect.
+ ~1 z) A6 ]9 C ?- L(5) For greater certainty, a denial of an application for a refund under paragraph (1)(c.1), (c.11), (e),
3 ^2 }; Q; w: V' @* \ Z(f) or (g) on the basis that complete or accurate documentation has not been provided, or on any ground
Z) r* R4 P+ u% E0 N$ N) Bother than the ground specified in subsection (4), is not to be treated for the purposes of this Act as if it
S: ?; y7 W! g( uwere a re-determination under this Act of origin, tariff classification or value for duty." Z$ O5 P1 N, v. G- p% c
4 `7 ?0 R; A( P, J/ G' g; o
这到底是说可以还是不可以啊? |
|