埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 3149|回复: 0

关于 邮购是否免税的问题 退税表 D6-2-6

[复制链接]
鲜花(2) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2011-9-29 22:42 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Memorandum D6-2-6Refund of Duties and Taxes on Non-Commercial Importations
& r2 t, j' A0 p  k4 v上面说 非商业 进口 可以免关税?* F9 \3 w2 I: ]. N4 r. K
4 g' U- t- V& f
- y& N' E1 K; x; J3 m
2 L/ c* j; `0 w6 y
http://www.cbsa-asfc.gc.ca/publications/forms-formulaires/b2g.pdf* v( N8 v0 V( F9 T" l/ r

3 ?. m; i3 c2 z" I2 y" q4 U  q7 v
  x8 K, U5 y) r6 k/ o3 v& B  ORefund Requests
3 f1 o+ B: J- y; l74. (1) Subject to this section, section 75 and any regulations made under section 81, a person who" Y  R8 T/ @1 K
paid duties on any imported goods may, in accordance with subsection (3), apply for a refund of all or part2 y' L3 z0 S, N) Y/ d; ~
of those duties, and the Minister may grant to that person a refund of all or part of those duties, if: l* X+ o7 |5 f. V
(a) they have suffered damage, deterioration or destruction at any time from the time of shipment to
4 d. P7 ]+ l( l; FCanada to the time of release;$ U* Z) I* x/ `
(b) the quantity released is less than the quantity in respect of which duties were paid;& K; v' X0 V/ c, v
(c) they are of a quality inferior to that in respect of which duties were paid;
, T+ y* X8 P/ R! c4 l% X& ~1 o( ~(c.1) the goods were exported from a NAFTA country or from Chile but no claim for preferential
  {" X: q/ _5 D; @. Ktariff treatment under NAFTA or no claim for preferential tariff treatment under the CCFTA, as the
- ]% b4 B% A. q) gcase may be, was made in respect of those goods at the time they were accounted for under$ b/ `5 F9 H; G
subsection 32(1), (3) or (5);
& e3 e- e# U. m& _, A8 m3
: O/ N" {9 U9 R! y(c.11) the goods were imported from Israel or another CIFTA beneficiary but no claim for6 e5 q! D% `$ q( L4 H5 U1 o: r
preferential tariff treatment under CIFTA was made in respect of those goods at the time they are
* }  ?4 X& q/ U( `1 b( g' @accounted for under subsection 32(1), (3) or (5);  }- p9 K7 ?5 o7 x
(d) the calculation of duties owing was based on a clerical, typographical or similar error;) b  E7 @+ _1 A
(e) the duties were paid or overpaid as a result of an error in the determination under subsection 58(2)
5 U' v0 i" T2 _  uof origin (other than in the circumstances described in paragraph (c.1) or (c.11), tariff classification or
% N+ W1 C* K9 Lvalue for duty in respect of the goods and the determination has not been the subject of a decision
# W) u/ u0 x0 K- v; k7 g$ ~under any of sections 59 to 61;! {* E2 S5 F. V) s6 ~( v% i# y
(f) [not applicable to non-commercial goods];) h" }% u+ ]! b7 E( x8 c- N
(g) the duties were overpaid or paid in error for any reason that may be prescribed.
/ Y1 L8 |+ `+ Y( b+ g8 M; C9 C4 Y(1.1) The granting of a refund under paragraph (1) (c.1), (c.11), or (e) or (f), if the refund is based
2 l" Q! Y2 K2 c, I3 c- Q  ^on tariff classification, value for duty or origin under paragraph (1)(g) is to be treated for the purposes of
) K0 I. l3 z7 Othis Act, other than section 66, as if it were a re-determination made under paragraph 59 (1)(a).
  V% d4 S3 h6 d9 p8 c(2) No refund shall be granted under any of the paragraphs 1(a) to (c) and (d) in respect of a claim0 D$ m5 i9 p  v( Z, Y- @: q
unless written notice of the claim and the reason for it is given to an officer within the prescribed time., `& \  R$ W$ y8 _# R- i4 w+ j
(3) No refund shall be granted under subsection (1) in respect of a claim unless
5 P1 R. s! o% W: A1 M(a) the person making the claim affords an officer reasonable opportunity to examine the goods in
3 q; d1 u" [$ ~respect of which the claim is made or otherwise verify the reason for the claim; and/ n% Z% V- P8 d0 y
(b) an application for the refund, including such evidence in support of the application as may be
7 P3 H( R1 \2 e, mprescribed, is made to an officer in the prescribed manner and in the prescribed form containing the' g2 G8 }! M1 |5 R# D6 E% t' u
prescribed information within+ B9 z0 Q1 m) c8 _$ V
(i) in the case of an application for a refund under paragraph (1)(a), (b), (c), (c.11), (d), (e), (f)9 Z" B( r( i  g# t- H% m+ h: ]
or (g), four years after the goods are accounted for under subsection 32 (1), (3) or (5), and" Q  L6 }. o& t: `9 ~
(ii) in the case of an application for a refund under paragraph (1)(c.1), one year after the goods+ E. N7 v* ^! F" o
were accounted for under subsection 32(1), (3) or (5) or such longer period as may be prescribed., K; Z3 g9 C, C% w" Y! o% r
(4) A denial of an application for a refund of duties paid on goods is to be treated for the purposes of
/ P8 T% ?# G0 V: s" ithis Act as if it were a re-determination under paragraph 59(1)(a) if
$ s1 ~! t/ t2 |4 a0 c  D/ J(a) the application is for a refund under paragraph (1)(c.1) or (c.11) and the application is denied
0 _" E  ^% |: e3 c/ zbecause at the time the goods were accounted for under subsection 32(1), (3) or (5), they were not+ m2 |! Y/ d5 A' M* n
eligible for preferential tariff treatment under a free trade agreement; or
) y$ M$ J- @$ x) }5 k$ r(b) the application is for a refund under paragraph (1)(e), (f) or (g) and the application is denied, d2 P, F$ h* B
because the origin, tariff classification or value for duty of the goods as claimed in the application is
- G- ?, F/ X' sincorrect.$ W9 ?6 X) e3 W, j# r
(5) For greater certainty, a denial of an application for a refund under paragraph (1)(c.1), (c.11), (e),
, V3 i% H5 ]. P8 _( p, n(f) or (g) on the basis that complete or accurate documentation has not been provided, or on any ground
( x* l9 z2 C) w  @; \7 Yother than the ground specified in subsection (4), is not to be treated for the purposes of this Act as if it
' y! ?- ?5 q' c' Q( Dwere a re-determination under this Act of origin, tariff classification or value for duty.
  v3 c$ F7 \2 k: ]: ~
" r" `5 w) o4 D& s  `( _这到底是说可以还是不可以啊?
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-7-19 10:50 , Processed in 0.688817 second(s), 10 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表