 鲜花( 2)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Memorandum D6-2-6Refund of Duties and Taxes on Non-Commercial Importations
8 V& s! f& \6 z, A4 H8 T上面说 非商业 进口 可以免关税?
; C/ d5 U$ b0 B: ]0 M4 z, c2 ?' b t1 I1 _( V
, G a7 j- k" b9 M' {6 n6 f# H0 h( u
http://www.cbsa-asfc.gc.ca/publications/forms-formulaires/b2g.pdf( s' c1 T# K: N
7 q4 |6 U- P! u( u
. F$ C! w, g! I* |0 o& w1 wRefund Requests. k6 W1 J; p3 f3 x( U7 {7 d
74. (1) Subject to this section, section 75 and any regulations made under section 81, a person who0 L6 f& U* d( Q2 Q: M& I
paid duties on any imported goods may, in accordance with subsection (3), apply for a refund of all or part4 D/ m5 D1 r( \6 `
of those duties, and the Minister may grant to that person a refund of all or part of those duties, if
0 `9 k; R2 J$ t# c: z& ?7 b2 _/ ~(a) they have suffered damage, deterioration or destruction at any time from the time of shipment to2 o* ^' b) J3 U/ d# W! m3 d
Canada to the time of release;/ n+ o4 W6 E* W$ d" I/ E9 _1 j
(b) the quantity released is less than the quantity in respect of which duties were paid;
' W q; v- ^+ j: w(c) they are of a quality inferior to that in respect of which duties were paid;5 m7 c1 g& V; T" P1 k9 l
(c.1) the goods were exported from a NAFTA country or from Chile but no claim for preferential
# P* x7 F) |# J) j9 |tariff treatment under NAFTA or no claim for preferential tariff treatment under the CCFTA, as the
7 _' _8 {; F t( o' u* Vcase may be, was made in respect of those goods at the time they were accounted for under" v% p5 D/ Z! O. C8 f/ \
subsection 32(1), (3) or (5);( U6 H$ Y1 C+ b! f
35 \! P/ S' I x, x$ v# A9 R% H
(c.11) the goods were imported from Israel or another CIFTA beneficiary but no claim for
1 y" `4 t, O7 u! m# B* fpreferential tariff treatment under CIFTA was made in respect of those goods at the time they are& c! Z/ L) G `2 T2 r+ H
accounted for under subsection 32(1), (3) or (5);, e% u6 Z$ }) g9 M- _& y/ h
(d) the calculation of duties owing was based on a clerical, typographical or similar error;
4 t1 h$ p7 W+ ]5 I) {1 p0 h7 M(e) the duties were paid or overpaid as a result of an error in the determination under subsection 58(2)% V7 r/ ~& }% y8 p+ b; z: g4 J% a
of origin (other than in the circumstances described in paragraph (c.1) or (c.11), tariff classification or
* }! P. s, z: _# e/ Avalue for duty in respect of the goods and the determination has not been the subject of a decision
$ @: k. D: B. B; Iunder any of sections 59 to 61;
% [; r, b3 @) F# f U& F- C(f) [not applicable to non-commercial goods];
: ]( S- J0 q; b! a6 O& @(g) the duties were overpaid or paid in error for any reason that may be prescribed.
) G4 o# X. r9 u(1.1) The granting of a refund under paragraph (1) (c.1), (c.11), or (e) or (f), if the refund is based; t+ N9 Z( I) a8 t0 ?0 F9 \
on tariff classification, value for duty or origin under paragraph (1)(g) is to be treated for the purposes of1 X. m& Z2 Q7 U% m
this Act, other than section 66, as if it were a re-determination made under paragraph 59 (1)(a).
9 j3 a7 ^# n; K9 A+ q(2) No refund shall be granted under any of the paragraphs 1(a) to (c) and (d) in respect of a claim
: m5 f' q$ w' \2 h. l# s6 Kunless written notice of the claim and the reason for it is given to an officer within the prescribed time.
# ~: h; c5 H. _/ a. T(3) No refund shall be granted under subsection (1) in respect of a claim unless; k( v3 `+ O! H6 r
(a) the person making the claim affords an officer reasonable opportunity to examine the goods in
7 n( h+ Z5 D* Drespect of which the claim is made or otherwise verify the reason for the claim; and2 b9 D4 l7 {( d G M9 h
(b) an application for the refund, including such evidence in support of the application as may be; Z# Y1 m8 u% A
prescribed, is made to an officer in the prescribed manner and in the prescribed form containing the
% _: R! c3 q3 l {# F) _, dprescribed information within
3 |1 k; U5 R |; ^(i) in the case of an application for a refund under paragraph (1)(a), (b), (c), (c.11), (d), (e), (f)
& l; Z6 H4 b0 @0 f( I' sor (g), four years after the goods are accounted for under subsection 32 (1), (3) or (5), and
1 Q; f" P6 C' [& j# M/ P, t(ii) in the case of an application for a refund under paragraph (1)(c.1), one year after the goods
4 [( K1 Q+ r) Xwere accounted for under subsection 32(1), (3) or (5) or such longer period as may be prescribed.
; O, O0 {. L+ t, k) r(4) A denial of an application for a refund of duties paid on goods is to be treated for the purposes of! b( u* H1 N& i- S1 I* g$ C
this Act as if it were a re-determination under paragraph 59(1)(a) if- |& y6 R. y5 k- T+ x
(a) the application is for a refund under paragraph (1)(c.1) or (c.11) and the application is denied
; A. |7 |0 L! H# @5 g" I7 ybecause at the time the goods were accounted for under subsection 32(1), (3) or (5), they were not, e, O+ e3 M, c4 ?5 x2 b
eligible for preferential tariff treatment under a free trade agreement; or
# ?; r( v) U/ E; f(b) the application is for a refund under paragraph (1)(e), (f) or (g) and the application is denied
" y/ ~4 Q- \8 A Bbecause the origin, tariff classification or value for duty of the goods as claimed in the application is
2 i& V7 c4 T) j* t: B" Sincorrect.! I/ T/ o$ e: R! ^
(5) For greater certainty, a denial of an application for a refund under paragraph (1)(c.1), (c.11), (e),
! n/ {: w0 c) N6 ~' b, E(f) or (g) on the basis that complete or accurate documentation has not been provided, or on any ground% r/ I+ V( }$ V- {: U3 y
other than the ground specified in subsection (4), is not to be treated for the purposes of this Act as if it
4 V: E% `* U- X5 V# Ywere a re-determination under this Act of origin, tariff classification or value for duty.! P$ U( Y, Z, G7 A- F
% S& y7 B% f8 @9 q% T- a' w, _& E
这到底是说可以还是不可以啊? |
|