埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 3639|回复: 0

关于 邮购是否免税的问题 退税表 D6-2-6

[复制链接]
鲜花(2) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2011-9-29 22:42 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Memorandum D6-2-6Refund of Duties and Taxes on Non-Commercial Importations
3 o0 G% R/ Y3 u上面说 非商业 进口 可以免关税?! H* j- A" e/ _; A; m5 u
/ {/ S/ `7 W4 w. a3 g( @2 {

5 R' u9 x! H3 l  p+ t5 `1 E
, |& V* m& w) ]* e# p2 q
http://www.cbsa-asfc.gc.ca/publications/forms-formulaires/b2g.pdf" |+ L, }$ s, M1 n) ]
. \8 I3 X, o; C$ B; I

6 m) K2 @' `5 ~* iRefund Requests. R2 l7 g0 u3 E) b
74. (1) Subject to this section, section 75 and any regulations made under section 81, a person who  d; A2 o6 r3 d8 K. L
paid duties on any imported goods may, in accordance with subsection (3), apply for a refund of all or part: H1 m/ H, [7 Z8 @
of those duties, and the Minister may grant to that person a refund of all or part of those duties, if
9 G- N8 {( o% S% Z(a) they have suffered damage, deterioration or destruction at any time from the time of shipment to" C- I! c9 W; h; V
Canada to the time of release;' j3 o# M% q, t5 W" N2 `4 S
(b) the quantity released is less than the quantity in respect of which duties were paid;/ v8 \& f: o' p- w
(c) they are of a quality inferior to that in respect of which duties were paid;
4 S  k# T: I! B7 `5 v(c.1) the goods were exported from a NAFTA country or from Chile but no claim for preferential. u! B! l9 r  P. d
tariff treatment under NAFTA or no claim for preferential tariff treatment under the CCFTA, as the
; [8 i6 ^' X: {% P' ycase may be, was made in respect of those goods at the time they were accounted for under8 P# C8 ^& ?* ~1 j, k' F" _
subsection 32(1), (3) or (5);6 k4 j+ F5 |" a/ `$ m
32 c0 r6 c. Y, {9 b" J2 t# H0 c
(c.11) the goods were imported from Israel or another CIFTA beneficiary but no claim for
  m% S4 i: P7 d5 ]$ A, i7 M4 qpreferential tariff treatment under CIFTA was made in respect of those goods at the time they are
7 R; I" I; @/ raccounted for under subsection 32(1), (3) or (5);
: I* B! J7 k; G4 D5 y2 Z" |3 q(d) the calculation of duties owing was based on a clerical, typographical or similar error;
; @, W- s% C# j# J(e) the duties were paid or overpaid as a result of an error in the determination under subsection 58(2)
; _0 X+ p8 f1 x2 K% _! aof origin (other than in the circumstances described in paragraph (c.1) or (c.11), tariff classification or
) V8 l2 V7 W4 {- V7 L( @- Fvalue for duty in respect of the goods and the determination has not been the subject of a decision+ N3 y+ q& o3 _/ k: e
under any of sections 59 to 61;
6 @& }/ o0 [) A2 ^( f2 p(f) [not applicable to non-commercial goods];# P& F( t! S3 p* V* Y5 p
(g) the duties were overpaid or paid in error for any reason that may be prescribed.% i2 B" T) t: |# x$ b% T) K6 m
(1.1) The granting of a refund under paragraph (1) (c.1), (c.11), or (e) or (f), if the refund is based
4 p, x& H. Y( L$ P( D1 ]on tariff classification, value for duty or origin under paragraph (1)(g) is to be treated for the purposes of
% q* X3 q+ `+ ithis Act, other than section 66, as if it were a re-determination made under paragraph 59 (1)(a).# a: Z/ u% q5 x8 b6 w( B6 R; m/ A
(2) No refund shall be granted under any of the paragraphs 1(a) to (c) and (d) in respect of a claim
1 x1 H' p1 b& [/ N* sunless written notice of the claim and the reason for it is given to an officer within the prescribed time.
5 N% \1 _3 K2 W9 Q(3) No refund shall be granted under subsection (1) in respect of a claim unless4 Q( X, X% l  ^$ t7 ?
(a) the person making the claim affords an officer reasonable opportunity to examine the goods in
  Z& A; A5 M4 O# orespect of which the claim is made or otherwise verify the reason for the claim; and: t' b' _8 `$ k) b' B7 s
(b) an application for the refund, including such evidence in support of the application as may be
, U& h. J, v$ ~" D" P# L% @& ~% @prescribed, is made to an officer in the prescribed manner and in the prescribed form containing the
. m8 v4 U6 R2 l  Sprescribed information within
1 S# s" w+ p8 I1 O(i) in the case of an application for a refund under paragraph (1)(a), (b), (c), (c.11), (d), (e), (f). S6 c9 q& r6 f0 ^& p
or (g), four years after the goods are accounted for under subsection 32 (1), (3) or (5), and
( t, H% P' P$ u2 y(ii) in the case of an application for a refund under paragraph (1)(c.1), one year after the goods, \( |' k, M: C# A" M2 R
were accounted for under subsection 32(1), (3) or (5) or such longer period as may be prescribed.3 Y; b2 E8 J0 w; t3 p! D5 @
(4) A denial of an application for a refund of duties paid on goods is to be treated for the purposes of
2 P* u. `; Q  _! [% V/ Gthis Act as if it were a re-determination under paragraph 59(1)(a) if
8 `+ W0 X+ L. B: e(a) the application is for a refund under paragraph (1)(c.1) or (c.11) and the application is denied
& K9 S1 j# M! P2 l8 X3 hbecause at the time the goods were accounted for under subsection 32(1), (3) or (5), they were not( n* K$ I) W5 {2 e) k0 A6 W9 f
eligible for preferential tariff treatment under a free trade agreement; or6 _; n. Z$ e: z/ d9 q
(b) the application is for a refund under paragraph (1)(e), (f) or (g) and the application is denied" o1 E- H# C& q' r- Y* v  P
because the origin, tariff classification or value for duty of the goods as claimed in the application is2 m. l, E9 P. P: l. \
incorrect.
* j5 y  Y8 ]9 S+ m(5) For greater certainty, a denial of an application for a refund under paragraph (1)(c.1), (c.11), (e),
- a* U6 d6 X  B% J$ M(f) or (g) on the basis that complete or accurate documentation has not been provided, or on any ground! f3 ]  j$ x+ S9 I6 B4 p- V. j6 g
other than the ground specified in subsection (4), is not to be treated for the purposes of this Act as if it
; Q7 I5 J; f  {  K% Y" Dwere a re-determination under this Act of origin, tariff classification or value for duty.
# l. \9 c; X0 D+ _
( o8 z( V- k& b2 T5 x4 J这到底是说可以还是不可以啊?
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-9-8 18:59 , Processed in 0.994972 second(s), 9 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表