更正一下,汽车玻璃本身就已经能档99%以上的紫外线了。 0 w- q8 K' i& T. _% Z L! d; |3 y/ H' v
/ P" M/ e7 g/ g- u
您的报价是包工包料? ' _% q# i. a" w. f: i; { z4 ^. R& f ) U2 x! b# l- W9 [很有兴趣捧个场啊
先谢谢捧场。这报价是包工包料。" |& q' d8 y) K2 E5 P
“隔除紫外线,99%”,这是窗膜的产家说的。对于玻璃本身阻挡紫外线的功能,我没有研究,不过下面这个说法比较中肯。" `( k9 _8 w# N* ~* V) ~2 U" L
LINK:http://au.answers.yahoo.com/ques ... 110528192951AAMROvu 3 x; {7 C- D: E! ?, F" v2 V9 {原文:The absorbance or blocking of UV radiation by glass is dependent upon the type of glass. "Normal" glass will not significantly block UV radiation. I don't think any glass will 4 e8 r( ~: v0 O" W" `
significantly block or interfere with UV radiation unless it is specifically designed to do so, ( p9 t+ B" a1 L" r, S
since certain compounds are needed to selectively block it. If a type of glass doesn't say that it blocks UV radiation, it is probably safe to assume that it does not.
先谢谢捧场。这报价是包工包料。9 [! o- F7 |+ r+ Z B T. S
“隔除紫外线,99%”,这是窗膜的产家说的。对于玻璃本身阻挡紫外线的功能,我没有研究,不过下面这个说法比较中肯。- y) J v8 ^' f m e
LINK:http://au.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20110 ...! @! x$ ^; S" M9 I7 O5 v
HWT 发表于 2011-6-5 12:22