Which lot is better?

fourseasons

Sorry, can not type Chinese. Could you help to look at these two lots, which one is better?
* F* I4 K! m' @$ X
Lot 46 in Block 3  $207900 (Back yard facing future school zone)
: [0 b5 m5 u, T7 J$ k. w# x' ~Lot 44 in Block 5  $198500

) m# P/ G' j1 uLink is here:
http://www.melcor.ca/community/edmonton/mactaggart/Mact_4B.pdf
http://www.melcor.ca/community/edmonton/mactaggart/StagePlan.pdf

执迷不悔

Lot 38 in Block 5 is better

Rapala

44, bigger lot, Conner lot, close to the pond, and not facing school yard.

fourseasons

2# 执迷不悔
% }% W+ g: w: J* v3 h. \( Z

But this one is gone. Have to choose between those two.

fourseasons

3# Rapala
0 n8 M; ^& h" |% [
' I% V6 w- g# NThanks for your feedback.

3 j. m+ D1 b7 f2 l3 v* oIf the backyard is facing future school zone, will it affect the house value eventually? It is really attractive since the backyard will be green area.
% B& z8 c/ c6 R1 h# g
44 is good too except for the narrow font (only 34 feet) and you will facing other people's back yard.

: n3 G, R* s, C% p& `3 qThanks anyway.

Rapala

3# Rapala

Thanks for your feedback.
. d' j9 \5 E! r- l" x3 r
If the backyard is facing future school zone, will it affect the house value eventually? It is really attractive since the backyard will be green area.
" N2 }+ q/ |' P1 a, k3 S) S4 H+ y
! n) f2 d; }* B% F) V" F4 ...
# {, j" \  Q$ I1 s/ G+ S3 ofourseasons 发表于 2010-2-1 11:14

! F( i  ^& Q$ _' H
You don't want the baseball hit your windows, do you? School back yard is good for some people, and bad for some people(no privacy) .
3 j9 ~, `3 [: D" b6 t5 x# z- Y
6 ?0 E- L+ H+ S0 Z1 |46 has two backyard neighbor too.

辣椒

8 V* V/ t5 Z' e- E$ M6 B: H1 }lot 34对于我来说是最好的啦，虽然钥匙圈是宁静

WST

Sorry, can not type Chinese. Could you help to look at these two lots, which one is better?

Lot 46 in Block 3  $207900 (Back yard facing future school zone)
Lot 44 in Block 5  $198500
9 C+ I( X- \. K9 q  w3 D1 D
Link is h ...
8 P' K4 n' }* a7 X6 Y3 yfourseasons 发表于 2010-1-31 22:27

以性价比来说，Lot 44 in Block 5 合算一些。
% x" {# i# ]! _( F; {) Flot 44 基本价= 40/2 = 20 万，很接近要价。
: o1 D! `7 J$ W6 Y5 c4 [lot 46 基本价= 38/2 = 19 万，实际价高出两万，虽然背靠绿地，但学校绿地不足以溢价2万。背靠绿地由劣到优顺序为：
9 C1 D' P- Y$ T+ f高压线，高速公路，学校，公园，小湖， Ravine, 大湖。

小黄

当然是44好。前面通小池塘，后面是小路。小路南侧是池塘和贵房子。车库在北侧，客厅在南侧正好和邻居相隔较远，客厅可以做两侧窗，或者做成八角形的格局。

46虽说是靠学校绿地，但那块绿地地势高于房子，不爽。

小黄

以性价比来说，Lot 44 in Block 5 合算一些。
lot 44 基本价= 40/2 = 20 万，很接近要价。
% n; G/ J2 Q- Q' X- ]2 s7 Olot 46 基本价= 38/2 = 19 万，实际价高出两万，虽然背靠绿地，但学校绿地不足以溢价2万。背靠绿地由劣到优顺序为：
高 ...
WST 发表于 2010-2-1 16:21

, B5 K! X+ V/ R; a8 M最好是高尔夫。Westbrook那些很不错。

小黄

3# Rapala

44 is good too except for the narrow font (only 34 feet)
0 h% k1 S! B; r4 B" e9 Tfourseasons 发表于 2010-2-1 11:14

那只是某指定进深的宽度。
2 D2 P" u6 ~5 v$ s8 Z0 b
房子的射影不是方形的。在最窄的地方只有车库，34肯定够用。等到了要摆客厅的进深，宽度肯定已经不止34了。具体pocket形状要拿开发商的图纸和建筑商一起讨论如何利用最大面宽。

fourseasons

11# 小黄
  K# l4 p4 t6 f) t7 t
: W3 n" H+ `0 r) c+ [) n9 \
看来看好44的居多，原来有些取舍不定，现在看来就44吧，多谢各位！
" o. Z  r6 T! |1 U; V另外有一点疑问，WST回帖中说  “Lot 46 基本价= 38/2 = 19 万”, 38 是pocket size吗？我看着两个pocket都是40的pocket 呀？
9 u+ E9 a  j4 K1 u: y还有site plan 上注明44是RC (Restrictive covenant),有没有什么说道？

WST

11# 小黄
0 p: s6 n1 O; g8 s& S
1 {+ ]2 i% D) w" _* v
6 `0 x/ L! I# r- a8 F+ F4 X1 \看来看好44的居多，原来有些取舍不定，现在看来就44吧，多谢各位！
另外有一点疑问，WST回帖中说  “Lot 46 基本价= 38/2 = 19 万”, 38 是pocket size吗？我看着两个pocket都是40的pocket 呀？
( a+ ]6 _; x" b5 O4 w8 G/ Q还 ...
8 j- G3 E+ U$ _$ t* d/ w0 afourseasons 发表于 2010-2-1 20:34

% E* G, N6 Z' M2 z. h* @8 R1 p3 U" j) k, d38 是pocket size. 我又看了 lot 46 (block 3) 的pocket是38。你再看看。