A survey of your preference(house type)

ceramistpalace

Which of the following you will vote for:
6 w7 @" w- j- ^2 V- l! u$ Z8 I
A.   bungalow
B.   bi-level or foundation-raised bungalow
3 C1 |) Z+ i- v+ K/ W) ~C.   2 storey
. f/ [' U) F1 d1 Q3 jD.   4 level or 3 level split

  AND
6 U4 M/ b& \; r6 q: ~7 u. T
* c! {8 L% }. p6 J5 P6 R* Y- U/ QWhat is the reasons for your choice?

ceramistpalace

seem like nobody is interested in this topic.

享受生活

bungalow or 2 storey

ceramistpalace

7 D* @3 R4 g! v- d! Y7 J6 g
9 P2 \8 h: \" w. g0 P  i 3# 享受生活
7 V& Z1 Y$ J5 {+ v, w' C/ n+ Pyour reply is a rare gem. And  BTW what is the reason for your choice?

青萝

2 storey.
原因是：各功能区可以很好的分开；采光比平房好；楼梯带来的装饰美感；还有就是便宜（相同面积的2storey和bungalow比较）。
4-level split感觉上分的太琐碎了，随便从哪儿到哪儿都得上下几阶楼梯。
+ f" P2 w+ B4 l0 Z) Z" j( J自己的感觉，不知道说的对不对。

宋兵乙

如果不考虑地价，当然是bangolaw最好了，方便，不用楼上楼下的，适合老人孩子。
* e+ Q' n. L! |3 n
  l) D5 S) V8 ~但是edmonton 现下的地价，同样的地上盖2 storey 最经济适用。
& n: Z9 y5 H1 `. c, {3 B; D; L5 s
2 k$ c7 W: {( E  P7 Y) [6 D最不喜欢的就是4 level split.

YOKO

1# ceramistpalace
A and C

ceramistpalace

2 storey.
, R' s2 a0 _3 U/ c% ?) d原因是：各功能区可以很好的分开；采光比平房好；楼梯带来的装饰美感；还有就是便宜（相同面积的2storey和bungalow比较）。
4-level split感觉上分的太琐碎了，随便从哪儿到哪儿都得上下几阶楼梯。
( E4 ~$ j  z- ~& M! w9 ^* \自 ...
. f3 j: ?' z* [* Y) b' z青萝 发表于 2009-11-11 09:13

' U+ L7 D6 w  R8 U: H# H: y. gThere is no right or wrong when we are talking of PREFERENCE. Thanks for your response to this survey.

小黑炭儿

I like bungalow because it's more convinient. We are living in a 2 story right now and there are too much running around, upstairs and downstairs. It make me tired.

propeller

C.   2 storey