埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 1523|回复: 2

TD Bank:OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-4-8 15:01 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly
) Z/ f8 t. G% O( u: gfrom 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove9 l9 F- N2 E! V' A" K  ^' q
unsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house
  h- q) z' r% j, _. s' o* oprices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by& `* X$ t  S- q$ d3 c
fundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This
* r# u8 \1 y4 d/ M% z2 d! roverpricing compelled a level of residential construction
9 e9 E% q- H( ~' S+ Vthat exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately: v3 R# s; b2 ?; f" K6 c
12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past
4 a8 O6 Y- T* ythree years.! f# y" y2 h4 F
By “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from: t# i) J* H' h# p# h* H! f
their fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of( t: g5 P. \8 ]: H5 K
affordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects
- K5 J, R( ~4 g% U1 m5 fboth a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices# O# f6 O! ~  Y& `9 Q# B# Q8 W* M+ v/ a" R
to fundamentally justified levels.
+ o0 e8 V- V1 {1 BWe consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”+ F8 D5 l7 D+ w. I2 Z# @' D
where homebuyers buy up too many houses and1 K. j% Q3 E- o/ F/ ?  J1 M' |1 L( L# R
that this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”* S4 t+ D# }) L' N2 l. ?; S
where builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although
8 R- q! k  l* o) j' q# fthere is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s) b/ g2 ]. V. F0 y- N& O
“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where6 O5 j$ f5 z3 M4 V" m* h* ~
homebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch- J2 V/ b5 X* t' D# l' x5 q; f
that is now being rapidly reined in./ J* _; X& {, G4 e8 z0 v" F; P
While most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,- z" c$ l, `7 Y& W
the construction of too many new homes over the boom
  T! U% y0 e2 Q7 Wmeans a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh  k3 B/ Y/ r" n! P+ f7 B& c8 k
on markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers
: k+ ~! Y0 v, i8 a7 Xfrom the cyclical downturn, house price growth will
3 o. R' ?4 s4 u" n2 s$ }remain choppy and new residential construction will be
3 ~- C3 i  j+ e) Q6 K1 Ddampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction9 H$ Q& ^1 `8 A5 m* V5 d
is now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this
+ j6 O7 ]  T0 y- Z3 \2 T2 Z% x- ]to persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide% z7 `8 k: C3 h. ~8 h
residential construction will fall further to around. H' q/ b+ M5 @7 k7 w
125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units2 f9 c2 u, @% Z# s6 }. d
in the fourth quarter.
& a4 h4 k, D: z# P! PTo quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,: k7 H" q, o! w9 j  N: U
we first develop an empirical model, based on long-run/ R4 N9 u: a+ A4 B- b* Z; ^
fundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each
6 E/ O3 G! `& k% }) h4 P% fprovince. Affordability is the key concept behind home: k" E; c% z" e$ f/ K: T" K
values since house prices should track incomes over the
7 T! T0 w' f5 o9 C- l$ g, X4 Tlong-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we
4 P' ~) B7 b% D3 f- \; G! Aregard housing prices and household formation as the drivers
7 m/ V" d% b$ k) ]of residential construction.
& i2 Y6 Y( j3 Q# P2 PTo examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a
- H3 ?2 j" Q/ f' T3 x9 u7 ~1 L“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction  P8 F+ N3 x# ]5 G& g& E3 G
would have occurred if housing had been priced0 Y3 K1 ~3 r3 ?& ]/ T. [% I; K4 c
optimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this
9 d6 J2 I+ {  E! E- T7 Wfundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new
* ?* Y7 c; ^8 m* y& sunits were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too
  v) l& ?  W$ y- V& ]  Amany houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.' d5 x. }4 v  ?. o" P
Regionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,1 l+ M: q5 K! w+ `& v: U! f/ O
where housing demand will further contract under waning' L9 b( j0 a4 z4 _6 a6 F, z2 {, c- K
population inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are
8 M, V. Z' O5 x, C& V0 _0 valready witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the. w* R- t. v8 q8 M% U3 w
very time that the resale market has swung into strong5 B# ^3 X9 A, r6 l5 |( |6 @
buyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces
6 U+ i+ W' [* d& Uhas been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural" c) K) O; _9 r1 i6 P6 {% \+ e
weakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.
2 t4 `! X6 A# aQuébec shows signs of strain – especially given the; J5 A, Y& T3 [- |8 S& ]5 T
strange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de
4 C* n, U" Q' _. K0 cMontréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,' Z5 Y* j% w7 f9 e1 l: E
given the province’s history of under-building and low ownership' [9 s/ o8 h: V+ ]
rates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a
1 {2 Y/ |3 _$ Q6 Hcyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears
& v$ L( l% H* f( n' k& Plimited – with the important exception of the Toronto: a1 U$ l5 A" U, C8 V' Y
condo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically
  w3 ?. F, Z" C/ Bhigh levels of apartment-style units presently under+ v# R& O4 r- A
construction mean that record numbers of condos will3 J0 t6 l/ \: s  Y5 E2 x/ C0 @
reach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as
: [" K; c( m& F( I" l5 ?! E. Jcyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could7 [. m0 ]8 X, k9 ]
spike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while0 f+ `! ]9 Y( ~# e& w
residential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we
1 ]! f" {5 Z; j" ?' [# lanticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from
2 i! A8 C+ v5 I$ Y9 V0 g1 cinter-provincial and international migration over the coming' S8 v2 i  G4 O5 Z1 y- O. S
years, which, along with improvements in affordability,
$ d1 y$ W1 V% Y4 s5 ~will alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.
" }8 b" b$ s! GOVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING
# v% e$ p  B0 g! D; nMARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS8 ?. T+ t( l% u
Grant Bishop, Economist0 S! I0 C3 i, f& l6 q! U8 d
416-982-8063
0 h( D1 d$ A' Z& P/ v  N9 C. L2 GPascal Gauthier, Economist
5 i; g) o7 k) y. I" j8 S  m. n416-944-5730
/ w  |; R) |. V' q# b5 m, W% k, }+ @5 k" l! y
http://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf
鲜花(52) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-4-8 20:39 | 显示全部楼层
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2025-12-28 21:50 , Processed in 0.100158 second(s), 11 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表