公告：xiaodou_112255 禁言二周

云山水月

公告：xiaodou_112255 禁言二周

* e1 ^: ~( ]) h* E其实这个规则未必人人清楚，但是有投诉只好有处理。

我决心判下去，还在于被告的发言在这里颇不妥当，煽风点火的味道很重，不单单是个禁言期间发言的问题。

  s4 u0 ]$ y2 k# p2 F. L+ v1 qhttp://www.edmontonchina.cn/view ... &extra=page%3D1

xiaodou_112255

.......................i just want to explain to you what happened, you didnt listen to me instead you judged unfairly..

please look carefully about what you said at the first time of warning me then you will know that i didnt go against the judge.

云山水月

原帖由 xiaodou_112255 于 2009-3-22 14:31 发表
.......................i just want to explain to you what happened, you didnt listen to me instead you judged unfairly..

please look carefully about what you said at the first time of warning me th ...

+ M$ W! f. O' u3 Z4 ]8 [朝阳可以认为你的发言有挑衅的嫌疑。我觉得这个你很难辩解清楚你同意吗？

只好如此判决。谢谢理解。

无敌魔羯

原帖由 云山水月 于 2009-3-22 14:33 发表
  k! `7 {+ s, H8 q3 V' l
朝阳可以认为你的发言有挑衅的嫌疑。我觉得这个你很难辩解清楚你同意吗？
# M" Y9 v. u* M4 e
2 F" G! k/ J6 M1 o/ d只好如此判决。谢谢理解。

' q' u  r" A0 t0 c
好像两个案件弄混了。。。
0 y, u) x+ z1 N( K  W4 L朝阳投诉的不是他。。。

xiaodou_112255

原帖由 云山水月 于 2009-3-22 14:33 发表

$ h& h& b. F  x6 I8 }/ {0 V1 @4 d8 h朝阳可以认为你的发言有挑衅的嫌疑。我觉得这个你很难辩解清楚你同意吗？
" {& i4 L4 e5 ~2 o8 D( V
0 I9 Z7 t. A4 k7 K" N: a只好如此判决。谢谢理解。

' t/ _9 P9 b& w" x7 z& ^! phaha, you need proof to prove the suspect guilty. how come if the suspect cant prove he didnt crime then he is criminal????

xiaodou_112255

原帖由 云山水月 于 2009-3-22 14:33 发表

朝阳可以认为你的发言有挑衅的嫌疑。我觉得这个你很难辩解清楚你同意吗？

  z& D4 T4 j! j" W/ h- r9 p只好如此判决。谢谢理解。

she could say that i am teasing, but where is the proof??????

云山水月

原帖由 醉清风 于 2009-3-22 14:35 发表


/ }5 w: I- t; }- |9 L+ d 好像两个案件弄混了。。。
" U3 l3 v) z0 i+ _朝阳投诉的不是他。。。

http://www.edmontonchina.cn/view ... &extra=page%3D1

xiaodou_112255

because we are talking at the same time, so i didnt see your warning until i posted my reply. i will not say anything in other poples topic but only my own topic, thanks

xiaodou_112255

up up