埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2336|回复: 2

[其他] Dow化工亚省工厂将裁员

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-2-4 13:59 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
道化工亚省工厂将裁员
3 `. b3 |$ u7 H! GDow Chemical's Alberta facilities will see layoffs. }6 U/ b4 s5 `' U# G

5 o- n1 i/ t9 O% fEDMONTON — Some employees at Dow Chemical’s Alberta facilities have been notified they will be laid off but the full extent of the job cuts won’t be known until late next week, a company spokesperson said Wednesday.2 U9 V' ^7 ]7 L
& Y4 @2 `) @- x# @6 x
Mary-Lea Crawford, public affairs manager for Dow at Fort Saskatchewan, would not say how many layoff notices have been handed out so far. 2 ~$ s: C, h: B: B% }

+ o$ t+ \  i7 J, a, jThe cuts are not expected to be as deep as the 11-per-cent target announced by the U.S.-based company in December, she said.7 u+ I  f! O7 I+ l5 ?+ C

/ _; y" i# x: M2 }5 ^Dow employs about 630 people in Alberta, with 550 in Fort Saskatchewan with the balance at its Prentiss facility near Red Deer.
% [, R1 s! X  k1 _1 `6 @" `
: |3 Y, y( f9 ZDow posted weaker-than-expected fourth-quarter results on Tuesday because demand has plummeted in markets such as the construction, electronics and automotives.. B4 H% b" U  D& d( I
3 r4 O6 i2 I  p1 v
Dow has tried to revamp its earnings profile over the past two years, first by announcing plans to sell a 50- per-cent stake in its cyclical basic plastics business to Kuwaiti investors for more than $9 billion. Then, in July, it announced plans to spend more than $15 billion to acquire Rohm and Haas using proceeds from the joint venture.
$ e& y0 x! r& A& E+ @" S* i6 M9 U# w- J$ V+ P" G/ v; u
Dow’s plans faltered when Kuwait backed out of the joint venture. Rohm and Haas said its merger agreement with Dow, was not contingent on the Kuwait transaction., ?4 N6 _  j3 U! }
) r, [3 f5 y" Q( D
Philadelphia-based Rohm and Haas sued Dow in a bid to force the deal to close. Dow filed its response to the lawsuit on Tuesday.' ?( R/ L4 G: O: n+ h5 Z+ e

  j0 h( M: R3 M& [- e4 g- ?; MDow argued the agreement was not binding, because it was impossible to carry out “without jeopardizing the very existence of both companies.”
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-2-4 14:03 | 显示全部楼层
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-2-4 14:57 | 显示全部楼层
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-8-13 06:16 , Processed in 0.141965 second(s), 13 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表