 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 
& ]5 y: w4 b9 e& D3 j& ~楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!0 y/ T$ E/ L! j! z3 |
corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ...
1 t; q9 |$ D9 b1 e( K
" g* s2 l) X* b1 f, d$ A您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。1 Q/ [! A- V! k% L/ f4 @7 |% V
* m9 W6 N$ o: L S- Y3 {安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.
, ?& |, E- |: x( v7 X" C- ]
3 m6 {0 B) N3 P) p) s不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?& q2 E/ E. d# B3 m) Y
1 u1 Y) v6 o1 F8 `% t' M3 j" |0 W' z
另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。
8 Q. F/ Z0 C7 O# J5 k" `. [
; ^( j( q/ E& n E( o% O" b关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):
9 C7 B- q8 T( Z$ H7 OYes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.
6 B; d2 m3 O2 C+ C: D3 p4 R
! h* ~4 p/ }7 O4 p4 r, {( sOr maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".
' i8 E! U' Q: n% l1 J. p0 T$ a0 t; Z# @9 u& v4 X6 d( |$ Q0 I6 m
But it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.+ ]5 d( M0 Z. c1 j3 r( i
0 ^- f8 w% u4 h+ U1 ]' x[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|