 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 
+ m1 r! P) N5 M7 T. Q) n5 m楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!/ s; ^! B/ |) T2 L! h" b
corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ...
: s- [. q$ D$ O, {. L3 s. E
% _) [; E J7 I$ W您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。6 B7 d! D; P' _' J' j! M [- A- ?
* ]) C9 o5 Z# F3 J安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.
( Y8 N% ^- V: Q/ T$ A( `: O
% ^; Y$ H3 v( h$ h不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?4 E/ O* C6 v9 T' B1 N$ ?8 K
- {, a9 D3 K! n( t6 C
另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。
) f- {. I7 G- ?' v4 z
: v5 T2 y- F7 H* k关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):
2 u9 g b @! e4 Q- OYes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers." {- {, S8 S. E! h- } a
2 l3 x: Z, G* o/ K
Or maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".
* l* l+ Z: I. H, y' `' [4 s" w# u! c) A" Z
But it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.- M6 X2 u& ]6 r; p
+ H) P! Z7 e+ L/ W. l5 X$ F[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|