 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|
楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表  % K) v! g! C; d; u% F3 m
楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!+ D- O9 l/ U! z
corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ...
" ~ n0 j3 q/ p, I6 k- M7 u1 s$ h5 i, G( i# |) v) y
您说的对呀，我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理， 所以听您这一说：我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了， 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。
\8 V, ]$ f) d! g
( ^% B+ _+ S, h$ [安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有：可靠性高（故障率低，ｏｒ ｈｉｇｈ ｒｅｌｉａｂｉｌｉｔｙ）, 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.' v6 j4 y. t9 j6 Z
9 p: _# G7 o- B" `不过，你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择，Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗？) g! w/ R' j! i/ G. i4 D" w
( K" a+ r) I1 B- U) ^( v, `/ {
另外，“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息，偶要查他个水落石出，好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。
U7 K/ a0 y/ g
8 k5 S" O# d0 G Q关于安全，我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 （SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了）：' F/ H; i; n& A7 H8 N F7 m
Yes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.2 P v# e! x+ V+ U% U' }
! [, V# c, y4 a4 f/ M
Or maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".
- `, _+ [& _1 R. v' x" V
, O% V1 `- ?& I3 y( z2 lBut it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.
7 U: ~% D8 |7 J4 A% m
* V+ Q1 }; b- Y+ R! L3 ^, p1 z[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|
狗仔卡
发表于 2007-12-9 21:44
提升卡
置顶卡
沉默卡
喧嚣卡
变色卡
显身卡
