 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 + F4 F. E2 p. p( z# i E
楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!1 E+ O8 p) r P& j8 @6 |
corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ... & }: z9 [$ p8 s' H& t
7 e- r0 a |& G! d您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。3 [6 {7 y2 H! F' x4 W2 N
2 d- [/ L! Z" D/ t, ?; Y |- Q$ [
安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.
/ p- A- ]& N! i2 l0 Z. G7 Q" B9 F1 Q3 N5 y7 c
不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?7 D; d3 H$ o' x5 k% ?* {" v4 b, M
4 n; p6 B' t2 ~& ]' L! j9 r另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。) b. d- Z7 U' [' a( b4 H( L
- b& Q& ^" _* Z关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):) v0 d& q8 P1 B$ h" b, B: I* W0 B
Yes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.
) t+ e# l* k- q2 l4 j3 l Q9 A) |$ W; c
! g& H1 [8 j5 y6 B/ @6 sOr maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".
' s6 y6 D- M; a# C) L. |& K k3 R% V4 M* O8 L, c7 f
But it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.4 O0 u @+ r# @+ Y5 c" g* X3 J
; U2 r( k, L; h& g# E[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|