 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 
3 L5 W: M! J. j0 j' Q# [楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!
( S" ]7 ?' D r5 u* ~corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ...
: `9 q( \, G- N# I
7 K" C2 e# B/ \0 M2 T您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。
& r7 f# e9 R1 F; B' g" S/ U' q7 m- e
安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.
0 F' E6 W* L# U7 V- E
, _2 }( D) D/ m# z/ u# j/ b不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?: u+ h" K1 R% m. c* e) g
' c. b/ j' H' ]3 d5 n+ p1 V3 D
另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。+ g0 B1 B/ b( O3 P( }
' ^' T' c) ?, ^4 l; E: o% [ A
关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):
' K5 j9 a9 z2 y% W. vYes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.3 U$ E6 v5 k! `( G+ {6 w6 A8 p5 |
$ L9 o4 j6 E' B3 w8 c
Or maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".- [, z. D) X5 V+ ^( M8 f& k/ Q
4 s( N5 Z; u# a# I" K4 k) A1 B
But it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe., \2 ]( o; f$ u) s9 l9 ^" I# H* Q. M
8 {# v) i d- }1 o
[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|