 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 
6 y: P, ~- K" i9 h8 W+ W楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!) Y8 G# _# T( ]$ V* T+ t) D
corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ...
: m/ _1 ?2 R4 t' Z$ b1 T6 g6 Y" ?/ {! z$ k7 H9 R
您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。
) x. P( H- C4 @+ @6 g9 O7 i" c4 N, {
+ v) L8 _) U7 I0 Q安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.- z7 g, L4 D# I3 u
5 v' S" a3 T" X! x
不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?
2 g0 h$ c; x& U. b+ M5 r0 ?3 q3 x: \
另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。
! d: ]3 \0 l; G" y5 P
* u2 M7 q7 G: M# Z6 o/ t! q关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):
1 _: `+ u N& mYes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.
/ b: x. {% j; b6 b4 }% e* C7 D& E1 E* C( q4 Z* Y" n; ~/ E4 A0 J: n
Or maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".
/ @% z6 j; `: u$ Y. q) T1 l& K
" i, }6 h# [4 M6 JBut it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.. V1 n" W) P3 U& ?1 l
! H) X* m& i c) q" h* _[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|