data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2be05/2be05cc864c48667c32731a4180ae506d6a7b8ba" alt="" 鲜花( 0) data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2f114/2f11409f18c73499c7999d6706890da8b74a7970" alt="" 鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canadian Natural Resources defers Primrose heavy oil upgrader9 `/ O! w# Y! y. n @+ _4 ?
Wed Mar 7, 6:21 PM
& ]& N# {4 e- ?) ]; ^ 4 K* C6 @7 _+ e+ C8 C6 G, M5 ~) w! g
CALGARY (CP) - Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. (TSX: CNQ.TO) has put its heavy-oil upgrader project on hold until Canadian environmental laws are more clear and service costs cool down, the oilpatch heavyweight said Wednesday. + k4 t D1 r7 i9 c K0 |1 V4 T3 i4 L7 O
w4 T$ l2 f0 w/ CThe oil and gas company decided to defer the long-term plan to build the Primrose upgrader in northeastern Alberta after preliminary studies indicated the legislative and cost risks were too high.
0 H& @5 V" S, k7 X. N3 v1 i* Q( F. S" @0 ~+ X
"It's the prudent thing to do," CEO Steve Laut said during a conference call. % p7 a3 v6 e' k6 X+ T
" B/ y% ~" S* o8 Q O/ x- ["We don't know what kind of greenhouse gas regulations are coming at us, and as you go into second phase of (planning), you start scoping out the size of the vessels, and of the flow, and we're not going to waste money designing something that may not be effective."
/ Z, S: S4 b4 U* V* j9 v" c9 U# d
The 125,000 barrel per day upgrader, originally slated to be in service in 2012, would process bitumen into more marketable light crude. The decision to put off the upgrader's design will not affect production plans for the in-situ oilsands project.
' G' [/ o- m( E/ \& M+ C. x
. U4 u- `% b7 S6 v8 ~6 x$ w5 EAlthough Canada signed the international Kyoto Accord on climate change, which is supposed to limit the production of so-called greenhouse gases, the current federal Conservative government hasn't made clear how it will proceed. % ~/ t; q9 V( Z8 `( \, B
, p; E3 \. Q/ h
However, Prime Minister Stephen Harper has significantly increased the Conservatives' attention to environmental issues as the federal parties jockey for position in case an general election is called. & x1 D% w0 m' E2 z7 _
g+ K& C; T0 J( e7 _( v7 sEnergy companies have been pushing for legislative clarity on the issue from two successive federal governments, arguing the economic impact of following Kyoto guidelines would be severe. $ v B, l5 r3 l' K3 A+ e- t5 G9 j
" v$ S4 y! z$ B, e
Several companies, Canadian Natural Resources included, threatened to ship their refining needs across the border into the United States to take advantage of more industry-friendly tax laws.
& z I3 S5 K5 f9 O/ K; c" {, E& O- U2 t* F% g
Going south to build the refinery remains an option, but not a likely one, Laut said in an interview.
0 C, q- `0 `$ w9 \* k1 a5 O3 x* ~6 P0 G5 q! _
"Right now we want to see what's going to happen here with the regulations," he said. "And the cost increases and cost inflation is somewhat global. So we're not sure it makes much sense to go to the U.S. either."
3 N3 K G% F6 [* M7 p( d" }( ^
Taking the upgrader out of the company mix came as a surprise, but shouldn't have an impact on the Primrose project or Canadian Natural Resources, said FirstEnergy Capital analyst Martin Molyneaux.
& h; ` i9 R5 ^ L- W( u5 e2 X3 S, T+ K" o! e( _" u4 n0 h0 |! W
Pulling the $4-billion to $6-billion project off the market temporarily will probably alleviate the labour and supply crunch contributing to inflationary pressures, he said. % F3 v# S% H* n
, p! G. ?% M% s; ^" {"The project is a fair ways off, and (CNQ) will have more time to use to their competitive advantage," Molyneaux said. , Z5 R) k3 }- S+ L3 a- w n& j ~' v
" a. A' m- V8 A- o1 T( J- u% O
Finding qualified, experienced engineers to take on the now-deferred second phase of the upgrader would also be a huge challenge in today's tight market, he added.
6 p" S8 l$ ?$ _; I6 u
# f% A1 ~+ ]. |Canadian Natural Resources reported earlier a 72 per cent drop in fourth quarter net earnings to $313 million, down from $1.11 billion in the third quarter of 2006, and $1.10-billion the fourth quarter 2005. 6 ^; u3 ~% A- M, C+ r! I
" l3 e3 d2 w' BFourth-quarter earnings fell 72 per cent to $313 million, or 58 cents per share, from $1.1 billion, or $2.06 per share the previous year, when Canadian Natural Resources made an $825-million risk management, or hedging, gain.
% W' V$ q6 b. Q* } _5 e' X9 @0 U% e: a
The drop was largely due to lower natural gas pricing, high service costs, and a strong Canadian dollar which impacted most of the oil and gas industry, Canadian Natural Resources said. / X5 N. C: E2 y! B3 N' `
2 h2 T9 F) o( Y( e2 v3 f
Adjusted year end earnings fell 18 per cent to $1.66 billion, or $3.10 per share, from $2.03 billion, or $3.79 per share the previous year.
- y! t7 M$ Z+ G5 o* c+ b( x3 S; K5 Z$ w+ p- O& b+ R
Canadian Natural Resource said its $6.8-billion Horizon oilsands project is 57 per cent completed, and on line for completion late next year, when it will contribute 110,000 barrels per day to the oilsands mix. 2 q5 U2 h: F: i. i! J
2 g2 P$ Y, s% {2 s0 ^4 u
Adjusted quarterly operating profit slipped to $412 million from $470 million despite a nine per cent increase in production to 613,764 barrels of oil equivalent per day, 56 per cent oil and natural gas liquids.
9 t4 @! G. t; ]6 |, J5 g9 u# j4 e
! J; X H4 C" @- Y* ORevenue declined to $2.51 billion from $2.9 billion as CNQ's average fourth-quarter netback was down 27 per cent from a year earlier at $29.13 a barrel of oil-equivalent amid natural gas prices barely half of year-ago levels. % {; g* l- ?# ^+ w* L0 d5 h m
! }7 c( ~+ N, G- w0 d' Q8 t' N
Percentage of revenues from crude oil and natural gas liquids increased 10 per cent, year-over-year, to 64 per cent. Crude netbacks rose 14 per cent to $36.88 per barrel, from $31.72 per barrel in 2005.
1 Y7 ]& D/ }" `* Z3 h
0 T8 e7 n" r3 q3 VNatural gas percentage revenues dropped 10 per cent, with netbacks dropping 24 per cent to $4.61 per thousand cubic feet. Netbacks from natural gas were averaged $6.09 per mcf the previous year. |
|