Is there a house bubble in Edmonton?

smalltown

How to figure a home's fundamental value
Leamer says he can tell because homes, just like stocks, have a price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) that he believes determines their fundamental value. The “earnings” part of the ratio consists of the annual rent the house could command. Homebuyers can compare current P/Es with historical levels, Leamer says, to get some idea of whether houses in their cities are becoming overvalued.

Not everyone buys the idea that P/Es dictate value. But investors who completely ignore P/Es do so at their peril, as many have learned in recent years. Leamer, who heads the prestigious Anderson Forecast at the University of California in Los Angeles, points out that the P/E for the Standard & Poor’s 500, a key stock benchmark, was nearly double its previous historical high when the stock market bubble burst in 2000. When home P/Es peaked in California, Boston, Dallas and other markets in the mid-1980s, devastating real estate recessions followed.
, H$ q. k* Y0 u8 f+ J
Leamer didn’t invent the concept of P/Es for homes. But his willingness to proclaim bubbles in several of the nation’s hottest markets has brought him lots of attention recently.
9 u6 B! p8 K" ]' L
To calculate P/Es for entire cities, Leamer divided the median home price in each by the annual rent for a two-bedroom unit in each city -- and looked at P/Es each year since 1988. Here’s what he found:


In Boston, the residential real estate market’s P/E recently topped 30 -- compared with just under 20 in 1988.

San Francisco’s previous peak of 25.6 in 1989 has been eclipsed, with the P/E currently at just over 27.
San Diego’s current P/E is nearly 30, compared with a 1989 high of 23.4.
New York, by contrast, is actually well below previous peaks. The area’s current 22.5 P/E is above its recent nadir of 17.6 in 1993, but down from 28.6 in 1988.
You don’t have to know exact P/Es, however, to spot signs of trouble, Leamer says. Any time there’s a disconnect between prices and the underlying value of homes, as measured by their market rents, there’s the potential for a bubble.
  c/ @. p1 F: n. B  ?: T4 R4 x4 l
0 c; p9 Q" b7 K/ W9 ~) h7 F. KIf home prices are rising much faster than rents, as is true in Los Angeles, that’s a strong indication a bubble is forming.

; k, B! D3 T2 O7 \$ G' y0 b' ~8 gIf home prices are rising while average rents are falling -- which is the situation in San Francisco -- the bubble is pretty much unmistakable.

, E) l4 I% L% d- S6 Y6 m Home P/E ratios for 9 metro areas
' M5 ?9 k/ ^) F5 k3 A5 m* z Avg. 1988-2000 2001
5 {. l" H6 {0 p* L6 QBoston  20.5 30.2
San Diego  22.8 29.7
San Francisco  23.8 27.2
Los Angeles  21.3 25.6
Seattle  20.4 25
3 m/ ]9 H4 E4 O% B' M% oDenver  17.7 23.7
6 i# R% A. J& Y" Q4 r, `0 v) ZNew York  21.2 22.5
Chicago  17.2 20.8
Washington, D.C.  17.1 20.4
) w7 o1 a1 e9 M2 b
) {& U$ U' l$ {/ q* U; C

It's difficult to compare P/Es from one city with those from another. P/Es in Atlantic City, N.J., have wavered between 17.3 and 11.6 since 1988; in San Diego, P/Es have not dropped below 20. But you can look on the P/E as a measure of risk -- that is, the higher the P/E is above its average level, the greater the risk, no matter where you live.
6 i9 O, A: h1 {" h( R. V

1 C# j) {0 y' ]" `2 k7 T  LFrom: http://moneycentral.msn.com/cont ... ingguide/P37631.asp

CANDYMAN

Who has the P/E for Edmonton for the last 20 years, please post it here.

it would be a good reference.

thanks

醉酒当歌

20% buble at least. And it can take 3-5 years to digest the bubble if not burst.
& }( Y/ e  D) e% H# ~
[ 本帖最后由 醉酒当歌 于 2007-1-14 16:41 编辑 ]