Is there a house bubble in Edmonton?

smalltown

How to figure a home's fundamental value
Leamer says he can tell because homes, just like stocks, have a price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) that he believes determines their fundamental value. The “earnings” part of the ratio consists of the annual rent the house could command. Homebuyers can compare current P/Es with historical levels, Leamer says, to get some idea of whether houses in their cities are becoming overvalued.
- c& _! X3 b* P' c# \) ?( q$ P
9 o  ^  z3 p. l0 |+ cNot everyone buys the idea that P/Es dictate value. But investors who completely ignore P/Es do so at their peril, as many have learned in recent years. Leamer, who heads the prestigious Anderson Forecast at the University of California in Los Angeles, points out that the P/E for the Standard & Poor’s 500, a key stock benchmark, was nearly double its previous historical high when the stock market bubble burst in 2000. When home P/Es peaked in California, Boston, Dallas and other markets in the mid-1980s, devastating real estate recessions followed.

Leamer didn’t invent the concept of P/Es for homes. But his willingness to proclaim bubbles in several of the nation’s hottest markets has brought him lots of attention recently.
5 x) V0 a0 E$ o1 n5 l3 M
* Z( I' a1 n# STo calculate P/Es for entire cities, Leamer divided the median home price in each by the annual rent for a two-bedroom unit in each city -- and looked at P/Es each year since 1988. Here’s what he found:

! m8 R- `. g1 l; R* Y8 ^" H
9 O* P. {. Y( GIn Boston, the residential real estate market’s P/E recently topped 30 -- compared with just under 20 in 1988.
; g  X0 L5 b  H9 |5 ]" C# C
! G7 _' j. P7 ]% h8 ]* M/ NSan Francisco’s previous peak of 25.6 in 1989 has been eclipsed, with the P/E currently at just over 27.
* H6 p3 @% @5 H- ?) F  f) zSan Diego’s current P/E is nearly 30, compared with a 1989 high of 23.4.
. n6 b, [9 K' ?9 FNew York, by contrast, is actually well below previous peaks. The area’s current 22.5 P/E is above its recent nadir of 17.6 in 1993, but down from 28.6 in 1988.
6 y% N0 ^1 P; P* s' h) iYou don’t have to know exact P/Es, however, to spot signs of trouble, Leamer says. Any time there’s a disconnect between prices and the underlying value of homes, as measured by their market rents, there’s the potential for a bubble.
7 z1 w$ b5 O7 u7 s
If home prices are rising much faster than rents, as is true in Los Angeles, that’s a strong indication a bubble is forming.

If home prices are rising while average rents are falling -- which is the situation in San Francisco -- the bubble is pretty much unmistakable.
$ t* f1 V% H2 i, A
Home P/E ratios for 9 metro areas
Avg. 1988-2000 2001
Boston  20.5 30.2
San Diego  22.8 29.7
San Francisco  23.8 27.2
Los Angeles  21.3 25.6
" l. D3 p% Y. N) n" bSeattle  20.4 25
" A1 o0 a( C' |2 ?* h5 U0 VDenver  17.7 23.7
New York  21.2 22.5
& d& k- t- s7 j) W4 p# k" oChicago  17.2 20.8
Washington, D.C.  17.1 20.4


! v( L/ X7 w1 p5 ^+ @8 S# n
6 r3 x9 [0 a" J" F# p! f9 E# ]It's difficult to compare P/Es from one city with those from another. P/Es in Atlantic City, N.J., have wavered between 17.3 and 11.6 since 1988; in San Diego, P/Es have not dropped below 20. But you can look on the P/E as a measure of risk -- that is, the higher the P/E is above its average level, the greater the risk, no matter where you live.


% L. `- G' ?" sFrom: http://moneycentral.msn.com/cont ... ingguide/P37631.asp

CANDYMAN

Who has the P/E for Edmonton for the last 20 years, please post it here.

it would be a good reference.
) k# a6 y: c* ?  z9 t/ Z
- j) H. S$ y0 I& w3 fthanks

醉酒当歌

20% buble at least. And it can take 3-5 years to digest the bubble if not burst.
( x! f& o5 j3 G! R
[ 本帖最后由 醉酒当歌 于 2007-1-14 16:41 编辑 ]