Is there a house bubble in Edmonton?

smalltown

How to figure a home's fundamental value
: F1 f* S+ C# Y, e5 y' L, J9 ULeamer says he can tell because homes, just like stocks, have a price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) that he believes determines their fundamental value. The “earnings” part of the ratio consists of the annual rent the house could command. Homebuyers can compare current P/Es with historical levels, Leamer says, to get some idea of whether houses in their cities are becoming overvalued.
) I/ H3 }1 D! Q1 u
Not everyone buys the idea that P/Es dictate value. But investors who completely ignore P/Es do so at their peril, as many have learned in recent years. Leamer, who heads the prestigious Anderson Forecast at the University of California in Los Angeles, points out that the P/E for the Standard & Poor’s 500, a key stock benchmark, was nearly double its previous historical high when the stock market bubble burst in 2000. When home P/Es peaked in California, Boston, Dallas and other markets in the mid-1980s, devastating real estate recessions followed.
1 G8 a0 U5 {; n2 z. |
6 {3 A" t: ]; c" b) n  eLeamer didn’t invent the concept of P/Es for homes. But his willingness to proclaim bubbles in several of the nation’s hottest markets has brought him lots of attention recently.

To calculate P/Es for entire cities, Leamer divided the median home price in each by the annual rent for a two-bedroom unit in each city -- and looked at P/Es each year since 1988. Here’s what he found:
6 w4 Z3 J' M9 s5 _/ n0 g) Z; @

8 g% ?) I$ ?' D+ _2 @In Boston, the residential real estate market’s P/E recently topped 30 -- compared with just under 20 in 1988.

San Francisco’s previous peak of 25.6 in 1989 has been eclipsed, with the P/E currently at just over 27.
  y$ ^0 ?8 r) G$ JSan Diego’s current P/E is nearly 30, compared with a 1989 high of 23.4.
$ l/ t5 {2 K$ bNew York, by contrast, is actually well below previous peaks. The area’s current 22.5 P/E is above its recent nadir of 17.6 in 1993, but down from 28.6 in 1988.
6 d/ n2 ~) A4 [7 v7 S! `. sYou don’t have to know exact P/Es, however, to spot signs of trouble, Leamer says. Any time there’s a disconnect between prices and the underlying value of homes, as measured by their market rents, there’s the potential for a bubble.
* f1 K; l/ ]; f% d, v
If home prices are rising much faster than rents, as is true in Los Angeles, that’s a strong indication a bubble is forming.

If home prices are rising while average rents are falling -- which is the situation in San Francisco -- the bubble is pretty much unmistakable.

Home P/E ratios for 9 metro areas
* G" D3 `# I8 T) L2 i' U0 V Avg. 1988-2000 2001
+ ~; t4 E& t9 A0 _$ a# ]# M6 iBoston  20.5 30.2
San Diego  22.8 29.7
San Francisco  23.8 27.2
' w" h( e& n& U2 Y: ALos Angeles  21.3 25.6
( d5 [! \0 j5 Q/ s5 `1 W9 l/ ?9 ASeattle  20.4 25
Denver  17.7 23.7
New York  21.2 22.5
1 p# M+ Z4 F  z& R$ MChicago  17.2 20.8
7 z: |# Q' K2 MWashington, D.C.  17.1 20.4


$ d, v: w7 A# j
It's difficult to compare P/Es from one city with those from another. P/Es in Atlantic City, N.J., have wavered between 17.3 and 11.6 since 1988; in San Diego, P/Es have not dropped below 20. But you can look on the P/E as a measure of risk -- that is, the higher the P/E is above its average level, the greater the risk, no matter where you live.
% S8 L. }" i# q8 B1 }
( p: l1 s+ \* D  M8 [6 v/ w
From: http://moneycentral.msn.com/cont ... ingguide/P37631.asp

CANDYMAN

Who has the P/E for Edmonton for the last 20 years, please post it here.

it would be a good reference.

8 i6 G$ y& S2 W; [% ythanks

醉酒当歌

20% buble at least. And it can take 3-5 years to digest the bubble if not burst.
4 {- e6 K2 g% G! {+ r
. |+ b4 T) {6 r. C0 k; x[ 本帖最后由 醉酒当歌 于 2007-1-14 16:41 编辑 ]