Is there a house bubble in Edmonton?

smalltown

How to figure a home's fundamental value
Leamer says he can tell because homes, just like stocks, have a price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) that he believes determines their fundamental value. The “earnings” part of the ratio consists of the annual rent the house could command. Homebuyers can compare current P/Es with historical levels, Leamer says, to get some idea of whether houses in their cities are becoming overvalued.

) P( G* J1 {( |& N+ ]  \Not everyone buys the idea that P/Es dictate value. But investors who completely ignore P/Es do so at their peril, as many have learned in recent years. Leamer, who heads the prestigious Anderson Forecast at the University of California in Los Angeles, points out that the P/E for the Standard & Poor’s 500, a key stock benchmark, was nearly double its previous historical high when the stock market bubble burst in 2000. When home P/Es peaked in California, Boston, Dallas and other markets in the mid-1980s, devastating real estate recessions followed.

Leamer didn’t invent the concept of P/Es for homes. But his willingness to proclaim bubbles in several of the nation’s hottest markets has brought him lots of attention recently.
& T) z! E& m; {# p
To calculate P/Es for entire cities, Leamer divided the median home price in each by the annual rent for a two-bedroom unit in each city -- and looked at P/Es each year since 1988. Here’s what he found:
0 m- f- w! t, K8 r* p$ J+ j
% O& a- ?. _( n: |: H) M8 f
In Boston, the residential real estate market’s P/E recently topped 30 -- compared with just under 20 in 1988.
! T! h1 S! a, F! t+ b0 I: v- u
San Francisco’s previous peak of 25.6 in 1989 has been eclipsed, with the P/E currently at just over 27.
; ~4 i3 o2 F* P4 {' JSan Diego’s current P/E is nearly 30, compared with a 1989 high of 23.4.
. U! k; K4 {! W1 DNew York, by contrast, is actually well below previous peaks. The area’s current 22.5 P/E is above its recent nadir of 17.6 in 1993, but down from 28.6 in 1988.
You don’t have to know exact P/Es, however, to spot signs of trouble, Leamer says. Any time there’s a disconnect between prices and the underlying value of homes, as measured by their market rents, there’s the potential for a bubble.

$ R2 z- e; \8 i, b/ Q9 IIf home prices are rising much faster than rents, as is true in Los Angeles, that’s a strong indication a bubble is forming.
8 s+ l( v. b3 h1 h3 @
If home prices are rising while average rents are falling -- which is the situation in San Francisco -- the bubble is pretty much unmistakable.
; ^0 ^2 J: L6 a/ c# r4 b. [
Home P/E ratios for 9 metro areas
8 p& u! _3 w6 P% n; |% p# J Avg. 1988-2000 2001
7 E8 h) I2 `! @" q6 R9 O6 BBoston  20.5 30.2
San Diego  22.8 29.7
- E, h% `& j, c( ^# ]# pSan Francisco  23.8 27.2
4 b( h* E; Q  q( r) D) M9 zLos Angeles  21.3 25.6
& _: Z' u% ~9 a8 [Seattle  20.4 25
: @4 R& {. c+ s3 T  j+ m5 K+ IDenver  17.7 23.7
New York  21.2 22.5
Chicago  17.2 20.8
Washington, D.C.  17.1 20.4

! s2 Z0 P4 F4 E  C( X

0 |. \  T+ Q, L4 ~It's difficult to compare P/Es from one city with those from another. P/Es in Atlantic City, N.J., have wavered between 17.3 and 11.6 since 1988; in San Diego, P/Es have not dropped below 20. But you can look on the P/E as a measure of risk -- that is, the higher the P/E is above its average level, the greater the risk, no matter where you live.
& S1 R8 E2 L# W2 ~3 q
+ w8 K7 \' |! v0 m1 n7 S" u
/ R. \6 o' \- A  N1 O5 J" t6 DFrom: http://moneycentral.msn.com/cont ... ingguide/P37631.asp

CANDYMAN

Who has the P/E for Edmonton for the last 20 years, please post it here.
  k: r9 i/ S! B
it would be a good reference.

thanks

醉酒当歌

20% buble at least. And it can take 3-5 years to digest the bubble if not burst.
  v5 f% `* s6 Y5 A" i: q: Q
[ 本帖最后由 醉酒当歌 于 2007-1-14 16:41 编辑 ]