 鲜花( 1)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
本帖最后由 xchen 于 2015-12-4 17:02 编辑
$ k9 u& \# m. O V$ f, Z' i* p: w. {3 ^% K1 J" e: p* w
; p* \7 V1 H7 e0 IIf total is 4%, then, calculate the amount for traditional way for a house sold in 400,000, you'll find it will be 4% for total (100000*0.07 + 300000*0.03)/400000 = 0.04, so the same for both.
* K" F; _3 _9 {! M1 |0 [2 ]
% H3 j9 Y! O7 Y. h5 vLet's try to calculate the rate for the traditional way: y = (0.07*100000 + (x-100000))/x => y=4000/x + 0.03
3 x. j7 y$ X/ t& j; [+ {; x% K6 L2 e6 g0 C! ^+ U& C0 R* \
comparing 2 realtors using above formular, you will see : 1) if total sale value (x in the formular) > 400,000, traditional realtor < 0.04, then traditional is better since it's < 0.04; 2) total sale value < 400,000, 2% realtor is better since traditional one > 0.04 3) if sale value is 400,000, both are the same..- \! e' m; y4 S9 J
% j: @8 |$ J- WNote: above comparison is based on the assumption: 2% realtor means 2% for each side realtor (i.e., total 4%) ' r2 D: R0 n, e: o/ ^
|
|