 鲜花( 1)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
本帖最后由 xchen 于 2015-12-4 17:02 编辑
; j* m% ~$ O2 s1 \. Y2 @
7 D. U, v6 p1 E2 R. W. `
' b* D8 \: I$ z/ r. FIf total is 4%, then, calculate the amount for traditional way for a house sold in 400,000, you'll find it will be 4% for total (100000*0.07 + 300000*0.03)/400000 = 0.04, so the same for both. ' Q6 o; \/ }- b1 f, [4 `
* A9 _- O! C+ f0 ~/ _, [0 z
Let's try to calculate the rate for the traditional way: y = (0.07*100000 + (x-100000))/x => y=4000/x + 0.03
8 G, ?, Q0 }8 m) j7 x4 _) u- o: D, f+ h
comparing 2 realtors using above formular, you will see : 1) if total sale value (x in the formular) > 400,000, traditional realtor < 0.04, then traditional is better since it's < 0.04; 2) total sale value < 400,000, 2% realtor is better since traditional one > 0.04 3) if sale value is 400,000, both are the same..
& k' V" Q' i. } }! _4 a2 E# F
: J: O! `4 z M' sNote: above comparison is based on the assumption: 2% realtor means 2% for each side realtor (i.e., total 4%) " D% }* ~& e1 \* ~6 B o: q$ p3 C" x
|
|