 鲜花( 1)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
本帖最后由 xchen 于 2015-12-4 17:02 编辑
. }- D( ^. M3 Z7 f3 `: j5 X! g' ^
( `! K. F+ ^2 @0 u8 r) p4 s
5 \0 d9 Q" z. VIf total is 4%, then, calculate the amount for traditional way for a house sold in 400,000, you'll find it will be 4% for total (100000*0.07 + 300000*0.03)/400000 = 0.04, so the same for both. 5 A% O6 f0 r; G- w
& F& q- {7 I+ e, e# @5 c
Let's try to calculate the rate for the traditional way: y = (0.07*100000 + (x-100000))/x => y=4000/x + 0.03
! z$ c3 A+ p4 u' `6 A$ R) S, @6 Z1 W+ Y" Q' }/ x. n
comparing 2 realtors using above formular, you will see : 1) if total sale value (x in the formular) > 400,000, traditional realtor < 0.04, then traditional is better since it's < 0.04; 2) total sale value < 400,000, 2% realtor is better since traditional one > 0.04 3) if sale value is 400,000, both are the same..
$ ?5 h- I( j! v! v! N( `$ X
{( n7 O$ @0 ]& D! E( gNote: above comparison is based on the assumption: 2% realtor means 2% for each side realtor (i.e., total 4%)
/ ?. ?& E' k* ~ |
|