 鲜花( 1)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
本帖最后由 xchen 于 2015-12-4 17:02 编辑
* `3 {+ D/ A% p) f5 r0 u. W
/ O# y# G9 s, C- v" u, M
0 ?$ s9 w. \8 z) z) r8 T: |If total is 4%, then, calculate the amount for traditional way for a house sold in 400,000, you'll find it will be 4% for total (100000*0.07 + 300000*0.03)/400000 = 0.04, so the same for both. $ T3 h u# b( S+ v1 Q$ A% t/ x. d
" ]+ m: f. H4 T) FLet's try to calculate the rate for the traditional way: y = (0.07*100000 + (x-100000))/x => y=4000/x + 0.03% @7 c, c( f# \0 Z* \
6 G7 q' V5 | v2 t% n0 E2 Pcomparing 2 realtors using above formular, you will see : 1) if total sale value (x in the formular) > 400,000, traditional realtor < 0.04, then traditional is better since it's < 0.04; 2) total sale value < 400,000, 2% realtor is better since traditional one > 0.04 3) if sale value is 400,000, both are the same..4 t4 M" @7 B) l& q
! a( x& c2 K0 R' \( ~! y7 c
Note: above comparison is based on the assumption: 2% realtor means 2% for each side realtor (i.e., total 4%)
\/ c& e& P, j4 p: `( H/ a2 q7 H |
|