 鲜花( 1)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
本帖最后由 xchen 于 2015-12-4 17:02 编辑
9 M0 q$ n5 o( s* \% rEdmontonian18 发表于 2015-11-29 03:14
2 {9 h% @& h/ \+ s$ S/ \4 U+ z/ BOne party 2%, the other party 2%, total 4%. Still a little bit less than tranditional 7% of the 1st ... 6 h- h* m( a4 R1 k! B
' ~( M y7 ?2 K
If total is 4%, then, calculate the amount for traditional way for a house sold in 400,000, you'll find it will be 4% for total (100000*0.07 + 300000*0.03)/400000 = 0.04, so the same for both. # y+ g5 X' {' e
# e( Z; y' {/ t, t' G( l5 K
Let's try to calculate the rate for the traditional way: y = (0.07*100000 + (x-100000))/x => y=4000/x + 0.03
- [* W4 P7 F# Y3 g5 S% o7 n* ^
& [5 J3 K5 f, _3 ycomparing 2 realtors using above formular, you will see : 1) if total sale value (x in the formular) > 400,000, traditional realtor < 0.04, then traditional is better since it's < 0.04; 2) total sale value < 400,000, 2% realtor is better since traditional one > 0.04 3) if sale value is 400,000, both are the same..
% U" c' ~) g) l8 ^0 h" z
( V7 a6 ]' E- [4 h- mNote: above comparison is based on the assumption: 2% realtor means 2% for each side realtor (i.e., total 4%)
" A" x2 k1 R; R9 K |
|