 鲜花( 332)  鸡蛋( 23)
|
本帖最后由 一盎司饭 于 2015-10-5 13:53 编辑 9 o/ f+ a9 F. M( o' Q
7 Q% r5 t+ j4 v) N6 T6 \- I' @
: L) a9 l/ f3 Y你想问“为什么PC有盈余”,答案很简单,就两个字:
" n5 G3 Q; l5 x7 ]# U3 F* M3 N: cRalph Klein
4 S! I- Y$ `) p: t" a' Z" Q7 S% D
我下面列举了能够查到的历年的省赤字情况。从数据可知,只有Ralph Klein任上是有盈余的。在他之前,要上溯到1985年,也就是30年前,才有盈余。其他的每一年都是赤字!( H: z5 V' m* D f% d
% V- ^& o0 g9 y7 n所以结论很简单。如果Ralph Klein参选,我肯定选他。如果没有Ralph Klein参选,我有充分理由相信PC会赤字。从Stelmach到Prentice,已经充分证明了他们仅仅是用PC的名义。他们的政策和Ralph Klein完全不同。Ralph Klein一上台就把省府部门砍了1/3,这次选举只有WR提到了裁减。你用PC10几20年前的情况套用到现在属于刻舟求剑。事实上Ralph Klein在PC历史上属于一个异常情况,Stelmach/Redford/Prentice才是PC的本质。Ralph Klein时期是没有WR的,右翼选民觉得PC可以代表他们。Ralph Klein之后PC往NDP靠拢,才会出现WR的支持基础。8 |' Y( s; u( {* t8 ^* B
9 G# u3 j. ?; s" |4 Y5 m$ D; q
/ R, n( _# m: U: W4 {& {( C# e* x4 q9 r d
http://www.edmontonsun.com/2015/ ... it-in-three-decades
5 n7 W, |* i2 c( b+ FHistoric Alberta budget balances:/ J3 e$ y, ^, Z0 `) T
, s; T# x8 A" m$ G3 r5 k9 Z; d+ r1981-82: $2.133 billion surplus
, {" |9 f' J }8 [
1 h: [$ {5 F! t3 U9 t% [3 t1982-83: $796 million deficit
1 v& @0 y; X% E6 k4 c4 A" ]) W- `0 N- m& Q, q* l
1983-84: $129 million surplus* R8 V' l8 t- }4 ~) G
4 d( u' z5 j, q: t1 N+ |1984-85: $1.245 billion surplus
+ \0 F4 R2 [; J, @* ^/ l
, c0 h& G' x( B( F [9 s1985-86: $761 million deficit
0 F5 p& a" @% p6 j/ u/ f( {2 T/ v- g C
1986-87: $4.033 billion deficit* e% |& J l+ Y3 G( A1 Q
$ h+ [9 T6 x; C2 L1987-88: $1.365 billion deficit. K5 r i! Y9 V: S. ^6 R
, L6 S: ?" a& @
1988-89: $2.007 billion deficit$ y a* l$ N3 S
" l' u8 H+ C; T& }& W# W* I9 K
1989-90: $2.116 billion deficit
% `) I j+ r7 r" i2 R
5 b, j& {% g4 \5 u/ i% t \1990-91: $1.831 billion deficit' f) f; |4 H. |; G4 N: j8 f1 N8 S
4 J }) B: D4 ]3 ?* D1 s+ ]: f1991-92: $2.629 billion deficit
+ R. W: b0 X6 |5 j! b3 R: V( q' C+ I. Z1 M
1992-93: $3.324 billion deficit$ n( J3 g' e6 U7 `( |
! b! Y2 G. _& C: v3 }/ K* a" V
1993-94: $1.371 billion deficit" W1 A* m, P9 x& t3 K7 x
+ ^5 |8 [. ]# }6 i5 i1994-95: $938 million surplus {, a2 W# s+ S- L& M3 F
; \& \: u' [! a o+ {" p, u
1995-96: $1.151 billion surplus
3 J& a5 U" K; z0 V$ K' Z/ U, M/ f3 W* _4 X/ W
1996-97: $2.489 billion surplus* O* A" k7 u" F3 J+ `5 ?
0 D% p$ O) T Y! ?6 z
1997-98: $2.659 billion surplus
6 \8 k: j/ Y6 b5 _" f
( y; w) }9 ] B) @" i; O1998-99: $1.094 billion surplus, n6 ]3 Y; e( X7 W+ d1 \
3 i" b7 K a/ d9 L/ ^% L; e
1999-00: $2.791 billion surplus
! y S& Q0 E" }3 w- F, ]+ S
: r Y# }; z1 w% _2000-01: $6.571 billion surplus1 ^9 c3 |5 V+ G6 z; j a* Q
" D( t7 k* i7 W1 {
2001-02: $1.081 billion surplus
: D! ]# m; P) o! F; w( z' W
) j6 V, w$ e. Z2 N2002-03: $2.133 billion surplus0 m3 x' z: S. i. G! l8 O3 E' v
, X+ d6 p9 S) z. Y6 O3 N2003-04: $4.136 billion surplus6 ^7 F- T( a3 V: M
% ] T: ~& E9 t8 B
2004-05: $5.175 billion surplus5 n; l3 i% E' \2 d; b( Y
* N" C5 z' q. T$ n3 Z9 K$ L1 B1 V7 v
2005-06: $8.551 billion surplus
7 D: J( \9 x' v) E0 E9 ^4 N# x- o* X/ r3 z$ ?: p
2006-07: $8.510 billion surplus, p5 E, w& k3 m" S: ?/ `3 {1 Z
3 V0 s! A5 M1 w& ^) \) B3 N2007-08: $4.581 billion surplus, S* l$ X3 d f& u
) p; d0 U9 { }! w# @# m3 I2008-09: $852 million deficit
! ^; O# V' O6 C* R7 q6 i- {1 O; `" e% L
2009-10: $1.032 billion deficit2 `9 e! Y3 C! e" |, h
0 J# j9 b+ w, r9 Q
2010-11: $3.410 billion deficit
, z; L! @7 x* F8 s" s# A, A! e0 U) H) f$ \6 |
2011-12: $23 million deficit
# i7 D) b2 n; p0 H; ?8 q0 g3 ?$ `! \
2012-13: $2.842 billion deficit+ E" J0 q* K. K& t& t+ k) F
4 B# K3 B6 r4 l2 t0 L. H: o2013-14: $302 million deficit |
|