 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable 7 O6 u t$ `" `8 |6 `$ R$ `
9 ~; h$ B8 e; C6 h
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
& N% E) x; M$ k1 P1 w9 N* y6 t9 n$ i8 e, ^% s$ \2 ~
TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market$ r( r! m$ ~3 P# k7 y' u% Y
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third# X! g1 g. R- U' m" P( K
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
3 V) z) n; f. v* Z: Min the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit* w* ?& p4 `% i5 }+ o2 t
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
, O" f4 O7 e9 W) d M$ Hmore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
& Y e* }" I$ G# j2 a3 K( xQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
; g' o+ [$ A: d4 m' [9 P: bLePage Real Estate Services.8 G, m) n7 j! i# Z
( D$ X4 q1 j! s8 n/ C0 F6 }- T Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters/ `- D+ t, n0 u& }/ o+ k
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
4 ?; w3 h0 M X N! fconditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
0 U8 b% q- E1 P& n5 Xsound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
. O4 Y7 a' N8 T+ ~1 Jresidential real estate sector.- J$ R* G8 j h2 I8 A
, z* e9 ^" g; n" A S6 P! x
Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
; ^8 Z9 I' b( S3 X8 p- Z# O, coccurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%) g3 g) x6 x P! A6 C1 z( V: x# a
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,5624 {9 D" g1 }# P* G: j
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,3802 W' T w6 @% }+ e# w. J; U. |, S
(+13.2%).
- }0 |7 P" ?! @$ E% {. h- }9 q7 a3 z. ^- X( C
"Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
2 i4 t* b9 J0 @$ Vduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
0 Z' J; K+ D6 S* efrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are) k6 t+ l: X& p
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
% q& v/ [, H6 q5 T% @president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
; s* S9 \5 [( s! Q"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
9 p2 u, i( r- F& {welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy& U/ ~0 _) [1 u7 F
balanced market."$ ^' u l0 ^" n5 H" ?$ J0 x$ v" U
& N) a% l/ L0 c/ N" V+ C+ O
Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
( f& o% ^: `+ S; Iconsiderable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift- n! H9 S% i' s8 y$ ^
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
6 d* C" Q/ q0 N( Y. Othroughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core6 d3 c, ?$ u* R; n8 j3 Y
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
9 F6 o6 r% p v% }manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
+ t8 P. ?, d. O% ?, k% b! cbreaking price appreciations.9 `7 \" e3 w' |5 S
$ x: i) `9 d' m) c6 b/ P5 Q0 R/ }
Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
7 N4 h5 X9 p0 M7 t3 R: J' g, Beconomy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
! L. R9 h, L# e% P8 u( Wlargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
8 |% J8 s3 |) [6 `5 Z
: E( B4 I4 ~( x+ e; I5 H$ b In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid2 f* C1 W1 d' Z
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
. _5 Q* u1 R# D3 q' v9 y1 `confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off% C, d2 I a8 V' q" X- D9 }
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
6 @6 X- s, A3 }+ EIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
$ ~9 a Q8 Q- M8 T6 D8 ^greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of+ G$ F# E* B2 s3 z) }
price appreciation when compared with 2005.6 Y* q# S) G" g2 }
2 O# |% P; C$ }, {" U3 F: H
While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing+ y7 u+ K$ L% C* c( X1 Z* V
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
& O* O1 V) A7 Q* bfinancial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
) _2 N# F1 s4 L& ^8 F: Lare markedly different than those found in the United States.
& F" Q' [0 ^3 Y. h; A7 _
$ K7 l- S& O& M Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the" n6 q$ d1 k* t1 d+ S0 G9 n& u) L
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
5 m+ O5 |9 n, Rfavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
( `+ C b& A( S8 Y" Prelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
# Z0 g9 ], W1 h; \6 a7 [0 h; Gaffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the; h; l; s9 ^, w3 H L, @# l1 p& Y/ A: |
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
2 b. o; B6 |0 Naggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization# e2 h4 q& W! v- K, s: j9 r# ?* F
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
1 o& t4 P9 n% N3 @+ E/ y3 a' V( N& z2 ?1 l0 d/ A) n D
<<, x" g) c/ t9 g9 p! Q
REGIONAL SUMMARIES
$ Z' H! ?: w* d9 h >>8 M- x2 U2 L4 O9 u; }) |- l
! A3 n# t# V7 j3 K Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
* g& p9 v! {$ j' _Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
8 j9 Z! y6 \& T8 Yof price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
i1 \( T: A* G+ X% F2 @looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
) W6 g. W. Z3 d$ lrenovations.
2 r0 P5 L; W0 U
& W" U+ V8 [" _4 E0 U5 } The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight/ b4 |- _$ k0 H
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
5 c! Q0 b) n9 C9 }# G5 M& mcompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
1 `2 j2 D8 N" V; z, J! P0 mSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
s- ^% J$ I! g `0 C3 m9 g# W0 G& ], B! }
The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
: n* I7 b3 J; o. ?: ~slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the" \( ], z, P9 ^# M
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
" M2 [! E/ `6 c600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
! O8 D/ |; }6 M) Eto the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes3 T. C7 z* ~& z. ?3 q- U
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
+ P4 b; L8 T. @9 w7 q: ~; `! h
( P' k& O+ {, ^) Z; y In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
, @3 K L( N% \$ |5 T2 Gconditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their4 Z' W4 h1 {; F) U7 c( [0 X
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers% ^$ v, j- n, W/ N
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian$ m8 G! M! k V; _! \+ S M0 P- ~
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing" N8 a( E+ ~2 W% y7 j d
buyers with more options when looking for a home.; j2 O! f0 c" H
9 r; U2 u7 ?. f9 V8 u Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly; Q( w* S* q3 V7 j, Y. C, P
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes5 f! m" a* P! i% ~( s% O5 o2 l: l P, G
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,% e7 N0 \+ U# V: p
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last4 I0 E( X v% O8 U8 s! p
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.( m' p6 V# F4 K
' P1 _" ]4 `7 }' p4 f Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
3 t% Z. \9 N1 E4 f# x. }prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
8 }6 g6 r Q$ o9 E |7 `levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
3 o7 ]! \, t6 a) K; efirst-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
* ]' k v; M; y. N4 ^when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
3 f( j& c- c1 g; r: opressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before# ]8 d. E U4 Y/ J- }/ p" E" k
making a purchase.
6 C4 e& u4 p1 a7 A
8 ?' C5 b7 ?: Q: @% a* H Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing$ m: Q6 n+ N/ v0 `/ p1 p+ C
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong/ |& S3 e3 z4 ]% {6 H9 o1 O0 K
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city' S; B( j* i, b Z, D$ y1 ?0 g
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
' A" ^ P2 X* \% e: `3 r6 I, battention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
8 i) u. @* s, v' R, w% lamenities. S' b5 { n( U+ k
% U6 U/ o/ m5 C; E5 T( h2 B' y/ T8 |& l( V The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
6 m8 ?0 ~2 N5 j* y5 T! y$ zthroughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
" }/ H6 l# A3 c8 v; D6 f0 ]" R# B B2 kacross the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has& a3 @$ ]7 Q+ I( ?) h
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
& v5 b' G, A; ~" ?1 }driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
% Z" J3 t; ]7 f. u. G( eresidence, rather than for investment.
: `9 s1 O: [/ ^2 m0 m7 p3 B( g
3 g0 x$ U: Y$ w% Q; r) U The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as. F/ r* O8 E9 P6 o0 X- A
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
6 F4 V8 p; @. d: e' G; y9 p4 ]2 ]in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
! {. a4 ~: t; l/ o" j* uconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization( H- r6 _+ m* z D6 D7 |( o
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter$ d3 ?( V- E: _' a$ _. a8 Z
the market.
5 W& C% R; t: N9 o9 B. v' u: J
, S: ~6 G4 n6 h s1 {9 R8 F In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
. t( c& c# y% n3 @8 xJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
( p$ x6 j3 V6 D( yAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring3 i0 f, B" ~6 U; m9 p9 u( e
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
5 V8 w2 [; U* _& Gto the shortage of available inventory.# s& O/ `5 a* X! d) H
/ g+ [, d& }. }2 p) Y! }; J
Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
" g: ^! g% m. _' K: k! e: Pmomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains$ Z, Y1 K: S" W0 x* D9 l
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
! D# R4 f3 C/ R/ G3 Z! P: Bstruggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
2 z$ p& ^* P+ G/ a" Z0 @/ Y+ k2 R+ O: t+ Y: O$ o( |# K/ U- H
Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases+ ]# N+ c+ w% p6 x8 W7 {
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low: o6 M; H5 ~/ D5 K
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
( g; f% }5 p+ D" U* G, X+ J' C8 }pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
- h# H$ Q9 }! f! Q0 nprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
: e8 }9 E, g0 G* g( ?4 Tseason - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
3 W" ?: T% d( Z- q# ^6 Q* Xbuyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
- |6 x5 z$ m$ Q
- O, X' J! b' s Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter# \& c# C) h2 V j, b
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
5 N2 w0 X8 @4 `& s# K1 B/ Aremained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
2 y# { d4 t! B- k# |maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices- p. m3 S& M$ A' {" ?2 M* C
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
0 ~8 q8 k. O6 Q& iin the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly L/ B% v' C$ F6 j# o
towards the end of 2006.
) _) M- [2 \2 h# L% X, h, X7 M
+ {; u" u7 f7 i* y) M! C$ aWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
8 w' Z* ]7 [, ^- V9 z1 yinventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
0 T% I" m' `& J( u& uto meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse/ U8 \ P, j8 u0 V
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to# O% @/ K! A7 i6 {' d2 U) h7 p
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
& F) Z6 R$ U1 Q2 ipressure on tight inventory levels.. v- U$ V, h4 o. {; c3 r5 n
) [6 z) a4 Z( X( M% g# ~4 |' m/ X' s
Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic5 ?! u, N8 ~9 W! w' ]
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
. G# {+ n6 k, p: G8 [into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;! b( U" B5 J& V q# M
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching S, }" c" r: `9 {% F
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
k- G- I6 L! g3 S- X. {' q! c: J5 Y9 T$ V
<<" ^8 s1 E: P7 x- n2 [; o/ r3 S
Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 20065 O6 p) F* M" O: y
- F+ }' ^9 J. v
-------------------------------------------------------------------------1 F% J$ t9 }& [" K
Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey
- ]" b0 J+ }( B: g# J! F% q -------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 a# b( {$ G" e! Y" p' {# \ 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3
0 m1 r4 g. G) X0 P; n @. z4 Z" _ Market Average Average % Change Average Average" c2 e. m I' m+ C V0 {" U: b
-------------------------------------------------------------------------9 D( |4 C, ~ m3 P y& Z; c
Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000
# _' E+ b: G; O z! @6 _* k -------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 | R1 N5 g( K1 c7 _ Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000
/ z6 I' I6 G: V/ }' D- q -------------------------------------------------------------------------
' c9 ~7 v) \/ s( a }; c Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,0004 a0 C8 _% V6 w9 G# q6 E
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
9 O. e) c( x3 x. h; v! s" X Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -
" s4 k; |& d% K& o -------------------------------------------------------------------------
- N! H* |: R6 ~+ y2 K St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333# w& y# c. b( n0 R( w1 e; S
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
; Z* m2 Y9 c$ a; j$ t+ E: m Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583 A6 @9 S8 H6 w: [* x; F1 g9 z* Q
-------------------------------------------------------------------------7 w' o+ B9 V! Q2 t
Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185) D5 s' C: t5 m7 K( z! @. n9 @
-------------------------------------------------------------------------$ }+ _% c0 m9 l' J
Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,2508 o0 F% E l9 U* s7 E& h
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
) T5 a" }. C0 z& g P Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766
& K0 }+ a0 H u! T6 ?, |0 D -------------------------------------------------------------------------; s) X* ]" ~, i9 Y+ T. @
Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707# k* a& _, I* _* J
-------------------------------------------------------------------------0 B9 u" ]) ]( j+ ]* @- W
Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500. r8 m! u2 E8 m" Z% S, x0 }- F: B
-------------------------------------------------------------------------' o. R( A( r4 z+ C* H
Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,3895 P0 D9 k* K2 a @; l: B
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
& W, H% j7 ?, \0 a0 _# ^5 l# _0 R Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714
& P* P/ |) f) p -------------------------------------------------------------------------2 |5 ?; N' q [* s& J& J
Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500
' K. A# m [& I7 M! M X6 [ -------------------------------------------------------------------------6 C8 d0 y( W! `
Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000
0 E# y4 V$ u w) o t! L( i -------------------------------------------------------------------------( d, _3 a5 P! M+ y/ F) T
National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,8606 E ~2 F. j# C. l
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
; e) o6 y* ^! V% Q+ I2 \9 D! @5 H7 q' w* I
-------------------------------------------------------------
) N7 O6 [; P2 X Standard Condominium ]7 d; ?' |! V* o8 z+ h2 \4 C2 z
-------------------------------------------------------------: x+ C _0 t& [" M! ~
2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo
7 j0 E3 j X5 s0 w; Y; Q. G4 ~; e% k$ e Market % Change Average Average % Change
+ N$ P: K( J$ e -------------------------------------------------------------
6 L5 w+ @. Y( ? Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%
! }+ f4 B2 w3 ~! F9 T -------------------------------------------------------------
4 A( A# U& L& Z: V5 V7 H4 }9 P* P Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%2 n) M4 v* u; L* g5 q! y
-------------------------------------------------------------3 E: O* p& d2 F* H( x
Moncton 4.9% - - N/A
" B* c! X! n5 \4 E# \5 J) W -------------------------------------------------------------
' J! H& v8 w$ J& t% t Saint John N/A - - N/A' i" U8 T! L. H, {1 M# ^
-------------------------------------------------------------
( p( @& c: ~* Y" @. D% e$ y0 ?" q8 i St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%
! _) k# @3 C6 f# d" ^" [ -------------------------------------------------------------
# X0 i, M0 \/ b) p/ u Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%, P5 J J- s, Y5 P8 `
-------------------------------------------------------------5 L* V( K/ a! J) ~* T) Y
Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%' b) A, ?' f F8 K6 A* O
-------------------------------------------------------------
+ u; J* p3 _7 G! u) E# t Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%7 S/ I P9 _' ^" D
-------------------------------------------------------------
+ K* w U2 @# |3 c5 {) F. U Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%
( R* g5 }! c) w4 W -------------------------------------------------------------3 T- H' i0 k+ r& [: P7 k
Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%
8 {7 ^7 H7 A2 c' G+ F, S -------------------------------------------------------------
8 {) y' b' |" F, W% ?1 [$ m Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%2 c8 E# `9 J/ _1 {3 Z4 n
-------------------------------------------------------------
9 |/ g8 h0 I3 y3 h, G. Y Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%8 n" N9 g a# k( N
-------------------------------------------------------------) h+ A4 _- f) q3 u0 e
Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%
# j7 [) ^. K# r e: i' ^2 V -------------------------------------------------------------
. M! N# |+ j% ^" M1 w Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%
5 ?1 d: K5 L4 Y+ n6 a( W -------------------------------------------------------------
3 u+ g$ N/ N; U3 ~ Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%+ m: s! r7 s1 P1 x! B
-------------------------------------------------------------) } j1 a$ b) _" G* n$ R
National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%
/ h+ b4 D3 E" c5 r, a; x, ^' O0 v -------------------------------------------------------------9 M. k+ Z B, b6 |3 B5 D
>>
, I' X# f8 g8 B* I5 P
6 J4 B. V& H6 u# K5 y5 F' { t Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined( W5 W7 o8 C5 I; x
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
1 z" _9 P# {0 b# ^John and Victoria.
; m6 j# d: `! |) Q5 I
0 `0 q N7 u7 m P8 W The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most6 x: O" _7 i3 P# F' [
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
! a# L) w, o) uhousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
; T/ ]$ x/ D5 L! [0 }3 a4 Freferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price- u4 Y4 Y. J9 \" c \8 u
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities2 G1 ]6 Z/ ^. t# z" T* I* Y
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
. m% ~2 V% {- V/ Q* ~) V" g* Zavailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current- x/ r& Y! `, I% k2 F
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable/ J( V" @: y5 U" c- ^& P }
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
9 e% s Q4 n+ F; V, g' m8 h4 YNovember 15, 2006.
: n8 a1 s% E( b: o4 j Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
5 C3 a- a/ J5 U$ kfair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
, _" }/ }+ Q( U9 ^provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
3 _. V: L6 Q. U1 w8 Davailable for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|