埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2024|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
* J0 }: Y: o5 ]! J0 C3 L0 n) \; q" l+ D2 y. B& W. u+ E
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -# c: J3 ~8 p% u7 Y3 `

5 r( [; V* @- j( X9 N! \, d* t* o# |    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market0 a$ [  L4 T: E6 S' Z7 L, Y) U
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third/ b+ s4 ~& D# Q$ v0 L3 M
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic, z3 u# E  w' J7 o5 r+ S' A. p5 B
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
9 @* g. |) b5 E& Dprice gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and* d% l+ W  N" e  ]% |) q4 `
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
1 |9 \" x0 r( iQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal$ M" w" R$ H1 Q, h, M, F
LePage Real Estate Services.
! w  R, U' \6 H" \- I3 C% H( `$ ]
! X: E1 k( k) L+ r    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
. u) k# Z; W( t2 S7 X( b6 Pare forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
& r- n! {0 Z$ Hconditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and/ i* d0 z$ ~0 X- S$ h5 m
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the/ c2 E0 D  A+ o; Q( p
residential real estate sector.% [  D' g' f, [( i2 K

) }. }9 L' r+ c    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation$ R/ m# F: k3 C  b3 h
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
# P7 {+ o  ~8 Myear-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562; L  l' D) V( g& V: E7 ]# O
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,3806 M2 I8 {6 T& u7 e4 e4 S9 `: h
(+13.2%).9 }9 S6 t, u# p- b; r  T0 J

/ A$ V: J+ C' n/ A- `    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth* a7 X/ E, w0 }6 d1 m+ g) M
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
7 X% Y  q3 J+ i; m1 qfrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are2 g# q( P" e: F1 z* U0 b0 ]
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,  w" l: x' @3 L9 L( t! O# ]+ `& ?
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
: f1 w: _+ U  W6 Z"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
  _( D7 |; n2 }. a5 X$ twelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
% T' D* w! Z; u$ r% pbalanced market."
( C+ y( a7 D8 u6 x; V( x. J5 K; h# c5 t# \8 [
    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,7 s( x3 j; R: v
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
8 b  j% E7 Y9 `1 @$ j/ d! D0 hto balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued$ k) O$ D8 F: M+ `  |
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core5 U( v- {4 ~6 i0 t" G, J
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
9 U% z* ^7 Z8 p! b/ U5 gmanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
- P* C* q! ~, j. M$ Rbreaking price appreciations.
, ]8 M, \0 c2 N  N0 O" ^- l; m: T: F/ Z! W
    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
7 z" d) |7 a) d$ {, Z1 Oeconomy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the0 O' H3 p7 D, f% {* K9 F( H
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.% O0 F6 H; T& p0 \5 K) J
: M2 \, G5 H4 D; `1 y! B7 b' @) }
    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid7 r0 i, ^/ p' P  A/ l" h
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
- \) G& U3 d& y' }; {* \( ]- {# jconfidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off# W  g% ]  S- Z2 ?# F
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.+ h* K: R7 t# A, @3 Z! E# c8 g
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
& y9 ?0 h' b+ Q- dgreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of1 `" u$ K$ m9 A( O3 E. j
price appreciation when compared with 2005.1 ]: K6 M9 Z1 S4 D: {

' q, E* ], Z0 l7 ~    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing- c, h0 J8 f. K: G& D. p- k' J
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and8 j& L1 _1 F# P& i/ u
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
" N* B5 O7 B1 V$ f2 s6 Ware markedly different than those found in the United States.
! f7 e# ^! C* l& R# R! H0 M6 Z" _1 t6 o
    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the9 ^$ _. t/ ^. v8 _3 I* F: }
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's% ]! e0 H) h! L) |# q+ f
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the$ k. g4 @* X. |! i$ c
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
1 d& j& q! h, h7 B& laffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
/ d; S% f8 U# [downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
+ |  j" Y  [- E0 v3 M; oaggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
) K6 H9 G/ U2 M1 z+ n- wmortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
9 P3 u/ f5 ^; g" ~8 f- A) g$ y! z' f1 |( y! H- |1 c. I
    <<  |$ g2 ?7 w0 l) c
                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES! _9 ?/ U9 ~, }
    >>
# j( o6 q. b) X- T! |. D9 `; G- z9 J3 W1 \; S
    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
" c, F, S0 q$ vHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate1 H( J/ H+ d0 Y9 ?# N
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
6 V$ |7 F; h" y$ a: j3 a5 T" Ilooking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of, e$ V) p; B% N
renovations.
: f4 j7 z% @5 j. X0 i
) u+ @; r+ e6 h; U* y# N8 W7 t    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
/ ^$ B# p" d3 C+ qincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
- f3 P  p7 I" V% P! ycompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
0 S% F! F" f# [! `. CSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.8 K4 q6 K4 u% g4 i, p- e5 P
. F& B& E' ]: [: j. X: N% H/ R- d+ H
    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer; D/ ?5 J: G7 m5 T% B
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the8 x2 a& p9 {1 r1 E/ J' o1 U& ?
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new$ \, \% D9 \# k9 K/ ~/ h
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
: `/ E2 g6 Y2 W# T8 w) b" T1 a: Lto the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes8 p. \/ M; e! Q+ A5 D! e" g
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
3 F9 ?7 N5 q  O" D1 y9 P& b% D; d0 d5 J4 M
    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced0 F$ g* d5 |6 f4 D
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
3 D+ I; D  E1 F* `! l0 A$ jhomes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers: f7 U1 B; l; F- c/ }. U
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
/ S6 ?* \% B+ m" cdollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing& W# S# Z. {9 H8 q1 g  z, U5 n
buyers with more options when looking for a home./ Z  F' P4 G& d
8 s8 Y; C4 F. d" V
    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly' g9 @( B; M' D; ^' u9 W/ D
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes6 v3 K& p  d8 |" ?* i! g' O
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,7 \& j, Z6 M+ B$ A, L$ R; g" J
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last. e, k, k  p9 Z
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
+ r4 m  j9 f/ A# {9 m9 w: T, f  C0 G$ l2 v# W/ E
    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house& S' i. {7 _0 s1 s0 ]; L8 j
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory! U% F8 V8 A% o2 K: G% E
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
7 h7 i, E  F0 [$ ^4 P9 _first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
8 R/ [9 \$ ?5 R% u; S0 ~) dwhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the2 ]$ }9 W& j( f
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
' m( G" J: E9 u. i4 p, H4 F5 cmaking a purchase.
! V1 k* z% x' q- n* ~) i: O4 X/ _- }1 U8 P) p
    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
. C2 d( \: I/ @2 omarkets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong5 i1 c+ r' N& e  z, S
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
, N* _% w8 A- h# M( V4 k7 F2 B* gcentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
; ~( y& e1 F" |1 C8 U# U0 k4 wattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown3 v! j" H: R  |( O, p
amenities.0 M2 t: O: Z4 _0 V8 m8 m: F6 W, N
' u7 l2 M3 x( x2 {$ p! }
    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
0 s" V: c; O& ?6 Athroughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand: F, D4 [/ u7 L% M/ M
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has7 ~$ L6 z; o9 D+ @. n4 W% n3 n0 Z
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
! K& j) n/ P4 j# c. bdriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle1 G$ `! R) H/ o3 H, ~9 ?+ u7 b
residence, rather than for investment.+ p+ k* d1 M( m/ X

+ p3 D! g2 M" E( j    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
( ~' w* N- l- N/ c0 q& k; ^house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
4 n" Z8 w+ ~2 u" N( Xin a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer4 E) N5 L" K% L7 J) f6 B7 W
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
4 R) a3 ~  O+ I% N% N1 _rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
" U  h3 R2 ]3 Nthe market.0 G% H+ p6 Y* g( V7 R

) C: P1 J9 H# ~- c. C" k    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
0 j9 }, }% l! Q& ]9 \July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
/ O: f# v7 T" b& A  j; mAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
' W- z+ b9 g# \  Umonths, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
* L; E+ ^" S- i6 m- R2 P9 Jto the shortage of available inventory.
0 U1 C1 ~7 \& ?4 H! V0 U7 J/ l% H% C+ F% [/ W  P1 [
    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
7 [1 [: }2 g7 g" b: Q0 }1 J; Rmomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains) I: W" G# I5 G3 a- K7 r7 n0 P
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
% x4 G1 t" k( |% ?& X- Dstruggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
6 b8 p  A% t. n/ b; t+ z
& F. d+ P7 ]) O7 [  C    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases& S( \4 r2 g" l5 H  x- E$ o
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low. |2 ^5 ]8 m/ ?* x& b2 R% w6 I% t
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that/ W/ t, y3 L( t( @7 t0 ?7 E
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring; w, T$ [* o1 d1 t
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
, `! i8 q, D6 Zseason - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as8 j( a& D+ {& Q" g
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.

7 N& u6 X8 q0 k" S0 u2 R
% C$ h/ `' W# h) B- \: [    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter; E7 m4 f8 X7 t: e. T( s' I
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
' w0 `/ T+ s$ F% r2 R" y' e& rremained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
  |' b$ a5 [# d0 H; g/ Ymaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices: }$ u8 B& q8 j! {) W
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
9 n  \" @! @' min the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
/ H7 e% C5 A5 U: v# jtowards the end of 2006.
    * L7 n8 O2 Y" d$ ^

, A! s- X9 J- VWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
( T$ P1 e8 }$ Einventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable' Z8 a( ^/ ^& n+ Q
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse2 O. P. Y  g  |" h- Z7 c) A
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
' G5 x% l+ y" E! ~9 [foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
6 i. T% O$ I4 ipressure on tight inventory levels.
+ K! N! l/ X9 f5 Y/ B& F- ]; n
5 E; }& O* w9 o8 U! f8 o% _8 t$ G    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic8 @% o7 |0 ]3 ]) Z) R4 d$ T$ g! ]
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
) y- v4 A8 Q! h8 Z0 b8 s' q7 kinto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;: h  [4 @4 u# j* ?% B$ {  [
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching, ^, n" j0 ^0 G
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
# k# X+ a# t$ L' g  z" x
$ V0 @5 B- B* M- \7 Z6 w2 m    <<# t' h9 ~1 y( S! _; Z
      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
  @* \( c; N9 |) H5 ]7 a- m. M. a" L1 G5 A, @4 d
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------& x$ [" V4 R! G. B
                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey
) H7 {  v- @; B" F( f/ o    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
7 y" J4 V2 P9 i! H3 k( r* i* m                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q3
. n7 u7 B6 J  P& L+ `0 C; ]! D    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average
3 f+ N! g; F2 D9 ]  E4 n7 t    -------------------------------------------------------------------------' |! ~/ @2 Y5 l# c% W4 W
    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,000
! T! x1 j( S. c  _    -------------------------------------------------------------------------: ]' X* t% n+ m$ C
    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,000
' M4 E9 H" c6 A1 f- ^    -------------------------------------------------------------------------7 U: a) }* \; Q# J
    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,000
9 H! {- V- V( ~. r* R/ j5 X9 s    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
9 Z* I  Y* N  O: i6 i    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -
% ]. L% n( o" D7 ]5 E    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
7 W/ R3 j" r/ }3 h    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,3333 k: y& l. U* U+ ]3 B! K
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------! C7 D! n0 u" v7 @, k# q" \
    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,583: f" m+ {+ X9 Y0 X
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------: V$ ^" W( s. `
    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,185% o/ _0 Q) A# Z$ I8 m' u
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------) E/ i. g- |) A6 C
    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,250
0 {$ `7 N( E" ]% Y6 u1 T    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ M" S5 I; ?. t  @5 O! J1 v    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,766
$ o3 K( z" `7 {) e9 e+ G; c7 S    -------------------------------------------------------------------------# h8 s0 `0 K, B2 ?
    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,707- Q! f, R( v  O7 v2 \
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
. E) J) u4 M4 t$ a3 |; n3 D$ {0 L    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,500% K) n0 |0 `( m$ y1 G) g
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ w) J  L2 e  l! ?    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,389. H4 b8 V) G. |/ L$ \$ ~
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 J" \! \# e; ~) Q. ^    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,714$ f0 z' u0 ]4 x. F+ {! x! Z
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------9 Y. q  V& w+ e$ X! E1 L% L4 G
    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,5001 r' B. R  F9 z
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 |1 u, d0 Q: s/ Y    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,000( W' e, @. g! e# g8 E2 O
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------% z" Y+ h* }& h8 @, Y$ f. l& x5 l
    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,860! f2 h* r& x; U
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
5 l6 v) i* ~- c# E+ H
, T1 D9 Q5 y4 ]/ y0 a: N" g9 b    -------------------------------------------------------------
1 R. \+ ^1 W, G) N                               Standard Condominium! t, r1 Y# ^$ h: \6 l
    -------------------------------------------------------------
1 A4 t( o. L' ^7 j                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo% l& e& G7 n8 @8 F6 J5 c9 c' T
    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change# O8 W; X6 D; f4 V9 }' t" a
    -------------------------------------------------------------
9 g, [8 A4 ^/ R- g5 [! d    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%7 }9 ~3 i3 ~4 w5 ^# S' {1 O
    -------------------------------------------------------------
: h; y; _% |9 p, n3 `    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%0 U- O/ }2 v6 e+ i  n4 @( E
    -------------------------------------------------------------$ E; F! J4 h% w/ t6 d' A) J3 p
    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A& K8 a. D( |2 A: {) {
    -------------------------------------------------------------. u2 q% I3 u1 H0 w% R
    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A
' ^8 c9 H4 X: D% p, Z- c* O    -------------------------------------------------------------9 C" j( w5 j( V' x7 f
    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%
5 r9 c% s0 k2 |& Z& l    -------------------------------------------------------------
) [- U( m+ v# N" C; ^8 U+ F8 v    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%
( [* t- F2 w# s4 |7 w    -------------------------------------------------------------' U& X' m# Z7 d& Q2 ^/ N5 o; L' _
    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%
. g; G) N  L" \) m/ N* X; f2 |+ M    -------------------------------------------------------------2 m7 w6 R( V1 x  P& c# B4 y
    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%
1 \* I# U7 t2 p5 `+ Q    -------------------------------------------------------------
2 a" L+ q! u3 T    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%( ~0 j* a* E! t3 M$ {, Q2 f
    -------------------------------------------------------------% r( a/ M& G  r5 b- T$ y2 [7 n5 o. w
    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%
' M: z  l2 Q6 T6 w( W2 c2 x    -------------------------------------------------------------; \* Z) q4 U" q5 x8 x" V2 B
    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%
* g1 H6 u& t6 A- _2 |3 W+ ^' o    -------------------------------------------------------------  J1 @: W  c. P" Y9 m2 o' p
    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%
- @, K9 m/ l( B5 O    -------------------------------------------------------------
, |) E. |& F& U3 `9 h5 b    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%
6 V1 y) Y) ]1 L' B- ?8 h+ [    -------------------------------------------------------------' ?! W7 J# w( T2 G8 }" p4 p
    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%
5 ^" T+ u/ I; w4 j- K    -------------------------------------------------------------  S8 D% R" L; v2 b: w- I
    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%
: M1 Z0 X/ B$ ~  ^9 ~    -------------------------------------------------------------4 f* }; G6 ~, t( p) b5 v
    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%
5 t5 C+ Y3 ~: P2 |    -------------------------------------------------------------
6 V, C- P9 D, R    >>+ V! A4 H$ q/ G9 q& Y, b0 J% P

% b% Q; W5 `9 {2 L7 c7 c    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
* Y: B; k* x  ~" v4 Bin the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
9 b9 ~2 G5 P' hJohn and Victoria.1 {9 I& b9 G+ T8 T  J& z" M

$ Z% s. X' |( x$ V/ j    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
" G/ ^" q1 |0 _& U4 Y2 ]comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of& M1 c& |6 |0 t  O# p5 [3 ~
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
! p! X! Y6 b) B2 ~$ u, z6 B9 Areferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
* [! R( g, D; V  E0 d$ ?# o  Ctrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
$ w: _4 X1 @, L/ ?% B, o1 xacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is2 L' Z$ I; e; \% R
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
5 _& J' U$ g$ W  @$ D4 V, dfigures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
) @& O$ y( I$ uversion of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
/ C: I) ?6 P# f" mNovember 15, 2006.
! \  _, N- Z% F: Z' @    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
( i2 y% K/ X7 v5 \fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
! x+ A, w0 [3 ~  Y) Pprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
# A0 |5 v- U6 h. k7 D* g4 Mavailable for some areas back to the early 1970s.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2025-12-17 15:19 , Processed in 0.135451 second(s), 10 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表