埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 1854|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable ) n$ v3 x- e) B+ ^" c9 m
! o0 M7 Z7 H% A+ s: W
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
- X; q6 o  @/ c* U; z( Y
! B: q+ d7 x( y    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
) W0 Z7 z$ S7 [exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third" t, c2 f0 P. e( d
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
2 J" K7 ]+ n' }) u  bin the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
! @9 y" z( p! B4 e8 A! E4 Bprice gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
' {% ~6 N* h% ^more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
: y3 F% l$ S) i* X$ {, n% C# e" M8 wQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal3 u  q9 P* O3 E: ^9 L9 h
LePage Real Estate Services.
7 j* l7 b% S1 h- [( j$ X4 |$ u+ B0 `; Q5 V& D9 t. j
    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
6 J4 a1 l2 r( Gare forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
3 y: D6 h3 o& i% {6 Y2 Tconditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and6 T% J2 e% ~7 `! Z
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the8 \2 W9 ?& B# C' q3 ^
residential real estate sector.& ]+ s7 i' c* C( J7 x  t$ C" B

. i% {9 l- y0 O* T! E    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation0 ~% ~5 Y! ^) l* u5 ^& K' H
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)0 s* M# ^5 d4 Y! P& k7 L
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,5626 W+ A1 L- ~1 a: C5 v" a
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
, g& R+ G/ ~/ }; \$ G(+13.2%).5 g/ |# [# n" E* h

% r9 H0 N) x; W! s    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
$ N. @+ e, I, a5 x5 gduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the- g( M1 T# c" a4 r; k8 F3 r2 ?5 T
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are7 \, E: E7 n3 Y. g. p# @1 T
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,1 D9 X9 H+ w' A2 }2 I" R
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
: z' M3 k+ k9 ?, u5 ^"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We" b) r! Q" f7 C' y9 G& A' S' {
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
7 J! l8 g+ ^! t2 V! @balanced market."% x2 {9 w( f7 K
" r; Y9 S# m6 Z* U3 X0 S( ~
    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,2 ~5 s. e9 _" ^/ |
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift, P# k0 i, M# C7 h( ]7 I8 y
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued* N# q9 h5 l, d' l
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
4 w7 \  N" ?# h! l2 F5 Yenergy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,' e# v4 j1 Z% h+ C2 \
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record  ]( e" ?/ x% f2 g) \. W  \" i
breaking price appreciations.2 k5 N. ], s5 s. Y! G& j& `
! y( H5 `& i4 m" C" ]1 @
    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding+ I$ G! @3 F4 {) S
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the9 Z( U$ y4 n, n' L
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.0 n* I8 R) a# \" c/ E
" p% O- {1 N' b. P# W) j( I+ R
    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid/ G% p. P3 y- s# q. h5 q
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer1 x& V9 G) H1 L. C( o3 i
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off) T" P, z. B% [. L- K  i2 p# I
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
/ ~+ X! x. R( A+ n+ o5 G3 VIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
6 M" ~, N& o5 M. U+ Xgreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of) i( S1 x6 i5 M9 P
price appreciation when compared with 2005.
# j$ c, e* T/ b) Z+ g# @) y0 c/ W! u6 H3 f0 x: W% d7 {
    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing5 O6 Q0 n! |7 {( I# T- q6 X
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
/ k6 ~6 q' q5 m7 c8 `" e3 rfinancial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
: w6 [4 L* [# Eare markedly different than those found in the United States.
8 }5 B  R+ j* C* U9 U$ s/ a7 f8 |
3 Y! f# c4 v$ T    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
: l  D9 L( {% V; c( mAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's  {. g( K, B# k7 i1 ?; C
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the6 s# h# S4 _- d& p' r
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
) {+ n* u2 H/ R* m6 Uaffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
* U. p6 u! L- cdownside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
7 U" @" w+ K* X& [" n" u/ |aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization7 T% L) ~' _# C# M
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
: m% s3 x4 X6 l
6 q* Z% @' \/ J. y, m/ x    <<0 ]1 D: T8 A& q. h+ L5 e/ d- z; l
                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES! g3 t& C& m- ]; I2 A8 I$ x% J3 o
    >>+ U( b6 _$ O* ?! q& Q4 `

  c. S: ?3 Q+ j& m    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in  _/ ?+ I! s, D' T4 N
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate' B( y# e5 x" p( [
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time% T. T" g- s# l+ H( G
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of: i3 V4 N& |  b4 F
renovations.
4 |% N) o$ a) R9 M0 x6 I2 Z$ F8 A' z
    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
& t+ A3 S1 R* R# J7 v( `increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
* _2 k' U& }* h" Lcompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and* R8 I8 U' w9 B" M# `
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
! T: C2 n9 U: p9 X7 E! l
" j0 {, q* F( M; m: ]9 B! @    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer: c8 d4 i# d1 d- Q* b! a
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
- f0 B( O5 Z7 |( _% tquarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
: y0 s$ l: G3 `- i600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
3 u- x) G# e" m- ?5 L- q1 Dto the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes! H: s- i' m8 m9 I
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
4 g/ z' e9 u, z
+ K3 Z% z2 A7 r5 ~  P$ @% u! B    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced- I: p: u/ e; d  m( g
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
- M8 K/ e* r; p' F6 thomes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
. ]; b3 i' J7 ~# Hwas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian, M: i* W. Q0 ]
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing9 T- n# E( ]! ^  s
buyers with more options when looking for a home.
0 t0 |" M) y- V5 {$ x* R
. D3 b. @7 ?0 t( u    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
. N' u7 e& Q7 D9 U. e: W8 \among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes" A$ x( j- R& D$ P  o
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,4 U& U. x6 O$ ^9 d/ T' \
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last- f: ~, z' Z: Q& U
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.( Y. }& g) D4 R' F$ ^2 P

% H& }0 R( t$ `9 I+ C6 a! ]    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house4 l/ Y* f1 k& y
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory8 s9 a; ]  E* \% S9 f) \
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting3 K+ P4 c0 @* i# f- P9 c2 @% h
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,* q5 J/ d$ ~3 @3 f# j7 H! C8 @
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
% B+ G# g, g) d7 L" t& o. z" ?pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before) g1 x9 I+ _/ E$ T+ k; v, C1 Q
making a purchase.
& d( N' d- {: O, Q
' W" Z6 b+ ~" p( Y7 k5 h% N7 B5 Z    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
" r5 P( A* G5 [! q0 B$ O3 G0 V; Hmarkets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
) r& t  `1 r% S- `3 Z9 |# o7 |, kconfidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city% Z6 J; B7 S" I, o
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
: Y1 D: j9 B0 P& P- Yattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
" m6 @+ ]1 W: @+ u. uamenities./ ]- g' B$ m  [% K* E

  j4 }0 I, v" h' k9 Q- {7 F3 f    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels  m+ y7 V* b6 ]( M, c- q+ ~: y2 d
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
) `* n) N1 _% r2 `. ^) oacross the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has% R7 T2 h7 f' p# ~  U
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been& f( {: N8 _8 `. V; t! T' w  ^: @5 \
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
2 h# Y) x$ Y% d, R* Z0 S4 D2 ]# Eresidence, rather than for investment.
) |# _) h, k3 a7 _  d0 L  D; }8 b- C. @( [7 J
    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
% v8 k, u/ H1 l* d! |# chouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted2 |! N5 U/ ?$ l) {1 h  ^
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
% o/ j+ g) U( u& C& ?* l9 z7 Cconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization8 \1 w/ ]+ W2 w+ H/ W! q: M' u. A) E
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
: ^- e9 ^* p9 f! Lthe market.
" H0 P3 T! {5 a- Q3 C% f. t
) L3 }. a0 N* `. O: T    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
4 H) V9 |1 F" E9 ?8 kJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In% f* s0 e+ X5 e% ~% u
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring) n% e8 T! R; o5 p5 Z9 x
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due+ U9 l/ u' o  B! @: @- L: d* [
to the shortage of available inventory.
+ u. V" d% T; D0 a+ k, u, C; L* ]+ V/ W) w5 I3 `
    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its( n2 ]: f' r" T& Y/ }
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
5 f0 `% L' }9 C( u  q  Rvibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses2 M; E9 u' u# F! \; s, M; M
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
4 r& J) h! D) A! M6 e
- O7 {: H. P" Q    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases8 p: l# o5 g. R  g4 Y! W% h
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
3 s7 [( N/ i( w* @* F' Munemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
! @1 @% ~2 Y6 r; e8 Z7 w7 k: f% Qpressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
: h8 t, q" r: d9 ~) z% V+ V3 T0 C3 qprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer: J' e- A; l' v0 `" N
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as. c7 W) Z# G, ~& `2 k0 ]
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.

1 O, W1 M0 k3 K
3 u% t/ }0 Z/ d! L0 \# {+ C1 w    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
8 c6 W! p5 I0 @( H5 ~$ Z, Las activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
' l8 R- _. B5 s" Sremained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
: X3 z6 T! J$ |9 omaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
1 }2 m' q. I$ F1 `+ V9 e$ s5 Mincreasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve- N7 ?8 ]! T! N* g$ Y" a) T
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly# |$ M% a$ w" f6 p
towards the end of 2006.
   
; G9 F. q* ]% N2 r
& N! H- H9 ~3 j, g' X1 z0 x6 l0 tWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of! D& ]3 ~  T" G- ]/ V3 ~0 v
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable# c6 s8 O" Q! b3 H. P! f1 x
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse8 r- Z" e2 k$ Y. P3 J
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to% T; `% `- c! V3 }4 ]( ?
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
7 |! R* j0 S' x  dpressure on tight inventory levels.6 H* V0 s. p9 C+ t3 H' ]' u
. a1 n1 D+ ?9 z, k" y8 y
    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic* [  f$ a: W2 W% i8 s9 @! d+ r
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people9 {; d5 Y1 N: ?2 {
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
9 y8 ]3 p& P. [& P" Qwhile increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching3 c9 M5 i, t& V/ D
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.& o2 R' Y/ i/ [! I5 z6 }

) l- D2 E, Q7 ~/ D    <<
+ w0 {& Q5 P, k  F9 L! R" [      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
( q7 z) ?8 W* y( q& @& R
2 x; X9 k( U, k/ g- H    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
! i4 d" x* g% n# k7 ~8 z1 F                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey
$ A+ r& W) D' h. w  m: W    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 e4 M$ K1 \% V6 r+ X: L7 e% t                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q3
. U1 z% ]7 U+ C6 r; B8 F, \    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average% x4 `6 v# O" e' v
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 n0 V' M) Y9 _8 }; j5 ^    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,000* D; T, i- I9 g
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 u9 c+ F9 N% e; `    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,000
* F. w- h  K. C) b) u    -------------------------------------------------------------------------( g4 {9 }) Q3 R; e* F$ Z$ w
    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,000
3 E; D0 Y- Q( u2 D; w8 D) Q$ T    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 h# e) ?- Z+ Q& @: |5 \. Q    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -( s, e7 M+ j7 Z* h  d* c- l% |1 S
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------$ _; O2 Z0 x) s" X" q7 g9 c
    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,3333 M8 b" Y0 P8 L3 M1 a
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
) z/ `: m" u) V( q# D    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,583
1 ^5 o" j8 F  f: k" ], t    -------------------------------------------------------------------------! w  \- T. z6 [7 x7 ]
    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,185/ Y: S" x) l5 i& t1 H# Z. T! p* o3 U
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 |3 s0 r* I( t, w    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,250
" r4 O/ ^0 D/ P6 N, T& S) }    -------------------------------------------------------------------------( q9 j9 N. X/ v3 _
    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,766
( j, @6 E  U0 z' Q# Q# k    -------------------------------------------------------------------------4 [, A4 l7 @) B+ O+ ~  I
    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,7074 u4 c4 W$ n" m7 P# i
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------, `# P. D, Q  R1 a9 p+ F/ H! ?
    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,500
4 B7 z4 B/ @7 ~/ y    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 }! d) g& Z0 |5 X1 ~3 f8 {    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,389
  J: l$ F9 ?' T% m    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 r4 x- U7 d% g% e9 h' l) s    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,7143 I5 o  w; m5 g$ ~
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
8 V6 `. O, f9 R; s( Z7 L6 X+ {5 {    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,500/ E8 Q. T. J# w) @1 G. s2 X
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------! Z. O  b  `& p7 a
    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,000( j0 s" p. d+ K) ~* Z
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
" S0 m( q" C0 {    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,8604 z- {5 J# z' P! c2 b& l
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
7 c2 @- [5 l) _. }: k; [
) f* v) D' P& E3 o* B5 N    -------------------------------------------------------------
1 G" ]! j1 |5 H                               Standard Condominium% D2 U$ Y0 @6 |8 t
    -------------------------------------------------------------
) [2 ]' X2 ~# f; u8 A1 g3 {! R                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo( f" `' i. o! L2 H4 e% S/ J
    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change9 a8 {# ?# t- z5 G% A; n4 q' U8 A
    -------------------------------------------------------------2 k* P6 e5 s# I, d* R  n  T) A
    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%  E# |3 ^- p) ^- g# T  q
    -------------------------------------------------------------" q# F& ~6 B9 x  ^/ `$ t/ s( x
    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%% e$ n+ @+ y" w
    -------------------------------------------------------------" |. v* e+ P- J8 P8 L2 V* G. e. @
    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A
7 X2 _8 P/ w* p2 o5 _% e8 L! L    -------------------------------------------------------------  F" ~' d  u2 @1 ~
    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A3 Z; P: U# N7 d
    -------------------------------------------------------------+ |% `; _& L- O
    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%( |1 E4 @) V) J6 ]
    -------------------------------------------------------------0 f, q# M4 W2 c8 U' k
    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%/ h" f* d& c1 G1 M
    -------------------------------------------------------------* v4 Z  J, Z6 z
    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%
% O$ l4 B0 ~' P1 b. r    -------------------------------------------------------------
" u) @' v6 l' `0 \3 g9 S: l    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%* C7 K9 H  N) v7 @9 F
    -------------------------------------------------------------
) E9 \# b9 ?: B: \& C. U# O: o    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%
7 G  p1 `/ |+ \' }0 I( ?3 t    -------------------------------------------------------------, c" b5 v, S* q
    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%- f% D9 B$ K. i% ^( h; S
    -------------------------------------------------------------
2 s" K, x4 U4 N6 q' ~( i    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%
7 a: v0 g/ b$ G* j    -------------------------------------------------------------
0 r9 Z0 Z2 i; M    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%( D! V) A/ c$ o) ~+ F
    -------------------------------------------------------------
( Y5 q8 V6 D% h! r- `* y3 V) r3 _5 E    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%
+ p2 k5 E) T3 M0 E    -------------------------------------------------------------
* W# i1 X  K1 x5 u- J    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%
% s8 C& G7 J7 Y7 i5 r: S6 n    -------------------------------------------------------------
. }) X, e' k& C- L0 J5 N    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%/ S: \& z/ b  e- s5 ^
    -------------------------------------------------------------- [7 `1 F2 S& [& [. }
    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%
4 p4 W( a5 I2 ^    -------------------------------------------------------------
5 j5 [6 G' l& V    >>* O7 ^/ ~6 u5 `8 j) k
, r6 }& F( i8 ^/ O5 ~1 g! a
    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
& W4 p- M/ N& U  L% k5 g* w$ Sin the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
2 k! m6 ~# R0 E5 UJohn and Victoria.
* Z/ |. u' {# ~. Q% m4 V6 q2 `) `: o. C8 z& ?
    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most$ v) j  Z$ J( F+ y# c1 K1 ]+ L, Z
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of6 u; Y! {  c* N7 J. v. F8 f
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
3 G( W) Q; r* R- t# Creferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
  Z/ R3 O0 I- R* ~- @! b7 ]3 g1 Gtrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities3 S' H$ L. j; `1 n2 D/ C. o) t2 K0 @% R
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
; }9 C0 x1 L& \available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
$ I; a" v4 |3 [) A) l0 d/ u9 O( t7 wfigures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable; m& L" z9 z: p: g. Z$ t. v
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on/ Y- r0 o: o( G" \! Q+ m7 y! _! J8 A
November 15, 2006.
9 W" {: A- A3 s, k3 @$ I    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
; s& U/ ~. K1 [1 `& D+ xfair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
0 d% A# C3 T& \, s( P! @* rprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
6 K/ [; a, E& G0 j: o$ U: Xavailable for some areas back to the early 1970s.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2025-7-19 15:22 , Processed in 0.109319 second(s), 10 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表