埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2418|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable ( e# I0 j6 C4 ~/ h+ O. |1 _

9 B& L  T5 J) v1 p$ C% }* O% O' O- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -% x2 n# w% c  M  n5 s
: H9 n( r& Q% {  b
    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
8 p( b6 _- B& W8 @4 jexhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
% l5 `* J: q9 S- b, Jquarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
9 P7 m. B7 Z& {" Q& ein the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit8 [; j2 B7 J- q7 O. u
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
. x4 E: D. g0 v& k1 ]more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,' s; b3 H& i0 r
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
1 |6 K: z' P6 h# cLePage Real Estate Services.+ \2 N6 d( H. r9 T+ f7 m

# \1 c1 ~3 j9 N" X5 P( P    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters  }; p0 C4 g/ B8 y* C6 E
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
/ }) g* |6 q* o& T/ L' r/ B! w  uconditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and- e& P, ^/ Y! T
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
% @# I8 {% `% f8 Bresidential real estate sector.
" b, \, R4 w0 t
5 d! {9 I9 b% N; a+ r: [    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
( X1 p: L$ \1 Y' Q( coccurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%): M7 K. h+ p* R# O% i' E/ [' |5 X  i( B
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,5628 q1 J: X! n) x, w. M6 g$ \! K
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
; X* ]% h' w- N: c+ [(+13.2%).
: |2 W$ {/ Q8 x5 |; I
6 y9 D; r: w- [  V( o$ |    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
! m. x( V0 F8 G5 Z$ }6 B: `, ?6 M3 Nduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the5 ]4 B: N9 k2 x  [/ o# i' V
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are% y9 ^0 T% P  A4 {2 T! I% G5 `, h
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,: }( {% X4 F3 E
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
# ~8 }8 h6 V* ?- T! {"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We7 B0 N+ I/ ^  V  k9 a7 g" W
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy+ ?7 N# H4 H, e8 Z8 {
balanced market."! W% N! a; p- f1 M' b
# c: x. M# z: r' A' P
    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,  r0 U% R  r* x! {! E/ i
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift& _$ w. C3 m1 Y- v# n- Y: B# }
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued0 C2 b( I% @& ~5 G/ v
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core( u. [* t. s! q( z) S( N
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
; N; ]1 {1 e( M) p: nmanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
) g4 {- U! ~2 q( Cbreaking price appreciations.
* b/ h2 N/ l" c( K) k& |# @$ ~
    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
3 C" {7 r: p" q% T1 Z$ l. Reconomy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the8 C7 r9 u8 w. A: R4 ^9 p
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
& d, J) z, m- e. q% V5 F0 ^
  @8 `# d* a5 c5 f    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
& ?* p6 [/ E8 z2 ~8 P, H/ peconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
% ~) Z( Y) H/ L( rconfidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
* v' [7 r0 p9 l$ l3 Z2 _slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.: ]* C$ e/ T$ L5 x$ C& p8 ?7 A6 Q
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers# h& l- G) y  |7 b$ C2 P4 @
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
  b) A; }( D: {% s2 g- eprice appreciation when compared with 2005.) A9 w3 I$ x$ i* _3 i* ^$ b

' A1 B. C4 h) i1 I+ K    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
8 W( ^% E8 {/ T+ x$ r0 P. nmarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and8 S3 o+ `5 P0 p( o
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
, @7 ?+ W. A: A2 {3 p: nare markedly different than those found in the United States.
3 s- f9 A" G# b3 G3 W/ y$ x- H3 I0 B& F
    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
' P  O# d, H8 d: G* q8 V3 rAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
  d  M; t" J2 c7 y/ N( Ifavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the) @4 j% I2 p% I( h
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general- e2 d4 P) g8 {2 B' L, s
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the1 e+ q$ S2 K( N  ]9 t
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and1 g" h) O$ o/ U4 |* S/ ?
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
) C; b: [3 s( o9 {+ ?, u% dmortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."6 U" ?! B: f# E" {8 W
- C" h/ t6 g/ v
    <<! G7 K1 `3 f4 [, i! z! L" L- r2 Q
                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES  L$ `$ o7 V' Y3 Z/ S; n( `
    >>- g# A) I" C: U5 M; u  C# Q5 |

0 D6 N4 D4 Z( X; `! [7 d    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in- c3 P! r/ S+ a: _0 y
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate* P! q  v: I1 ?, Y+ D3 B# ?" w
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time, g3 o% _6 X* `+ T' m
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
/ E3 ~6 z+ `1 D& k3 ^+ y: prenovations.% Q$ y' g/ N! l2 v$ m0 }7 m  D
2 e+ l8 ?7 s2 j5 a: M; y6 B
    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
/ l' {5 T" B3 T0 yincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
+ i& j0 M+ i4 `4 y$ c8 gcompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
# q' M" }% C8 }! ZSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
  @% n! Y1 X- }: [) \2 @: b! @) Y( q8 r) J% s8 N7 D& j" ^1 `4 x
    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer$ v/ ^# {$ @; U/ [" w  t/ e: Q
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
0 e, y; A; Q; P1 y: }4 p) M8 A: e$ Qquarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
* c6 Y$ k; f& H+ I3 {600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores  _) Z9 R- _4 a
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
& G) s3 e! H, y  I* E4 Oand are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
( [( g2 I2 w, p! Q+ L; f% D8 `) P, ~4 i) d. O) j- Z8 I
    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced( g$ T; X/ ~% @4 a
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their  S! _" A! M$ K& s* I" _- |
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
+ f; J% h! n" X! s9 }* Xwas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
; D# h) I! j7 C. jdollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
1 D; D* F" Q8 dbuyers with more options when looking for a home.
9 E6 b$ }, ]& F$ `. p/ \6 {' }8 o" h: n% f+ V. r
    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly5 Y$ I' l7 Z4 x( I5 `7 D6 p
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
: J$ H0 @8 s0 f2 x% w: ?2 Epriced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
  T% Q) f" v% {7 Y+ V" f( fas some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
& J& H, f3 {6 ~; K- hfew years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
6 w# n9 K$ P- H! n! l
, z! Q/ E; [- x2 v. j2 z! f7 F    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
; B' n+ c4 B5 i- u  |prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
4 Z$ ?8 r' e. E( r4 xlevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting1 g4 _4 R3 e0 X0 L1 ~' ]5 v' a9 h
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
8 _7 E; i  i! x" h2 o7 ?/ Mwhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
' r! ?9 o4 s* h0 tpressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before/ f4 y$ m6 i, j# K
making a purchase.: k0 ~3 @" T! L$ A- a
2 D$ J4 p: t6 }; Z# U
    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
/ U1 U6 X" M. a) k  ?. Y+ Q5 M0 e2 vmarkets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
, H7 f  P6 X+ |confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city% E& g  s* s0 k. p* t) c, c
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
' k! p2 k, Q3 Xattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
; D3 M1 k' S  c! k1 W+ Tamenities.3 _4 Y" |+ s+ X9 f

2 \9 q) x( l+ d- W8 e7 D0 w    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels' E! ?) W/ ^. [: t3 u
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
0 V8 [, n  ]. }, y: I0 xacross the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
6 i7 p, V6 f6 ]1 ~1 l4 Ncontinued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been' d4 y1 O. ]2 F$ A4 h
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle9 y8 P! ~, n$ Q) c6 {
residence, rather than for investment.& L& l8 k8 ~5 g. G+ Z

1 L! x) L% B0 A7 l! I, o5 x3 R    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as( o# F8 A& j- v( L# E- q0 ~! h
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted* b& Y0 g3 g0 K6 v& g) B) z
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
& p: N( i( X/ r+ B! j# Mconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
9 |9 T4 T5 z% M, X3 M7 f& ~8 arate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter# \2 z, U" V- K) R$ {( h
the market.9 c" t: A/ V& T

/ Y1 h: S9 F1 h* n! A0 ^7 ~    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
! j# i% @. X# {* t% }July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
' G3 G5 w* W% f8 q6 HAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring! Z% q( d2 b! `" i; C
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due  h! ?  D! X' v, d$ w
to the shortage of available inventory.
+ k) {+ m4 L2 l, [$ \, C8 M8 D% J( }8 I" t9 I
    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
' ~$ h5 e; _$ p4 {& ]- y* ^! Imomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
5 G4 _: I$ U, I7 E  ^+ }% m1 ovibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses9 l) u2 z& G4 X: Q, O
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.  E0 P5 Y0 W+ N+ d
2 F2 K1 c0 L0 n& e7 Q& L7 z
    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
& F* K# s* r/ m' K1 C9 rin the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
) n7 U; k, v, q1 e* {unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that/ f& I. e0 q0 @6 \( C, r) u
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
+ e3 K3 w  Y! I7 i* Vprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer; o% j" C3 Y4 Q% e/ X+ _9 f
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
' E- H2 r; \; T$ Y! _; H3 j9 ~! Q! Mbuyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
3 S# X. @. ]1 c" N+ C, g: N
& q6 c+ v+ e4 T3 }
    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter3 x' x9 x. e* e! |2 }) k; j  Z- s$ z
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton/ _+ d6 F. ^% F4 O
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,: a0 j& K) ~  o- f/ b$ O; W
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices- ~" ^& M; _5 i
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve$ c! B1 T" D: t7 M! @7 l+ M
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly2 E' @6 ~+ Z* E9 A  ]1 }3 l9 w
towards the end of 2006.
    % k( ^5 ?6 w' e2 l

) T4 }. y+ K. }% ~1 f7 eWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of  u  S" {+ k6 ?1 o: J' T
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable2 x4 w/ h1 V* A, E
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
2 k$ X" i4 W2 w7 Ogroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
- |: U+ A9 k. I( y7 y4 B2 D9 T% zforeign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
( [9 Y" N! ?3 Q# d! J% i% \3 Ypressure on tight inventory levels.
) F4 {) Z7 H& }, c! W2 c% l1 R3 h9 J. W" a
    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic+ u" f0 B5 n* X% t
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people. n( ^5 h/ \1 c2 W
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;) S; L# I( L& |4 q( w( p
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching' l8 S* @+ F0 i2 u
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.* [( F( N" \$ O& H8 ~. Y

& h' G( R0 R+ ^7 T! |* J1 e    <<' r, r4 |5 i3 u3 e' u
      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
2 N% B8 K# x" B4 q6 D" i" ]" @, l/ N% T& T
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------) C' I' W2 r" C4 ^, G, _
                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey8 `' g0 L& f, I5 F: A
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
5 _/ u/ L" D  {" D                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q30 Z" N) e! `7 n' H3 P$ p' ^
    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average
# f% A3 Y8 D) m) a$ N* X9 ?    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
; n) F4 R2 `9 b+ `    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,000! [% s( |$ v4 {+ O' b1 s
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------! u3 r+ H2 t/ }# \! M7 g, B7 j
    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,0003 m- w0 i/ Y  D6 q
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
% ]# H0 B4 ~4 }9 m% ~: }    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,000
' T3 g! ~' I5 C" X) B$ ]* h    -------------------------------------------------------------------------2 }2 ~" z4 |6 i/ j
    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -' l  I9 n$ o( _/ Y
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------$ e5 F3 n1 y% v8 G2 ~
    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,3335 _- Z5 t5 U: F
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
: I5 ?7 t' a6 Q9 z    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,583* Z8 t9 g& z# f: ?% k* p4 {
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------" Y0 Z9 C/ K$ Z1 T! `) U  M( c- L
    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,185
  _6 ]$ U+ s2 N    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
: A; Y6 k' S0 d  B    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,250" B6 t& M' P- o3 p7 n+ J
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------9 z+ J, H' v3 Y7 }
    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,766
' ^. G( X, L3 f0 j! ^: B+ N8 b    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
9 ~( k9 f! e/ I" k# ?    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,7070 V8 X2 z& i* ~- b3 U
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------$ z  |/ M( K+ S  p1 Y3 i3 q
    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,500
+ x1 l5 u& `0 v1 ~0 e. `/ h/ j    -------------------------------------------------------------------------' M; W  P8 w/ p" Q7 |
    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,3895 B2 d4 j2 O/ Q' T% ~
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------3 ^9 D, L/ \( @1 g& ]' q+ _
    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,714
8 o, P- ?- H2 w' E    -------------------------------------------------------------------------% C% S9 s  r: d2 t( O% j/ l
    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,500# m. y1 A+ s$ u4 E, Z
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
9 w- f  s7 d( g( D9 y: x    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,000
: ~+ g& W1 ^8 B; ~8 {$ q" C    -------------------------------------------------------------------------$ ^( C2 t4 \- T& E! e
    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,860* H* W. I1 s0 ~: ^, X" r' K
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 c9 ]  }5 P+ z5 @7 G
2 j) D1 ]3 {' p9 l  @    -------------------------------------------------------------- C' n) v0 ]. q2 {( e, }" [2 u
                               Standard Condominium
& z( z' t5 {5 _7 J& l    -------------------------------------------------------------6 h/ |% q% r4 `; d6 F: m7 h$ `
                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo* R9 D* m" Z: K- F8 S$ g" }
    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change
- Q3 M& U2 Y; i    -------------------------------------------------------------% P/ n2 b! }* a0 r
    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%
9 Q6 V# ?' \+ r" V) m. t    -------------------------------------------------------------2 u  M& z' B' l" k
    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%
8 t# @; j" A7 y4 a3 S    -------------------------------------------------------------! n; s. K; S* J
    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A* @5 a' O, H4 _) i
    -------------------------------------------------------------
5 @: }5 q  l9 n: L1 X    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A
* o+ O- G; K+ u6 D3 @    -------------------------------------------------------------" h  F. S$ |; Q- `
    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%
, S* g% N% O1 n/ C    -------------------------------------------------------------
  J1 S% y9 r2 ]6 S! Y/ }    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%! J" O2 E4 v, e# O4 w1 b1 i
    -------------------------------------------------------------
  B& x1 T! C; Y, U8 D    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%
) ~$ b! d5 B% P) a- a    -------------------------------------------------------------
* }- g& Y. v' ?! g, I  A/ m    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%8 t+ b/ b) ]0 ]9 K  f
    -------------------------------------------------------------) x. z4 X5 s5 [+ i- ]' j
    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%* x2 Z6 }, C9 J' s2 [9 n5 c6 H
    -------------------------------------------------------------
, V3 Q- A" h. ?* s  b    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%* u5 a/ t8 k4 E. {
    -------------------------------------------------------------! n8 B% s2 {( O9 N2 a! M# o
    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%
# x  D! I; p4 J5 {: N    -------------------------------------------------------------
! O9 n( _6 h) }* g  O# H9 H    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%
2 F# Q, B* R4 n# z, }4 [3 K2 U* y    -------------------------------------------------------------( G' u' }" p+ z
    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%, H' v  H% c6 G7 I  C
    -------------------------------------------------------------4 f+ t' `( v$ z
    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%
+ Z! y- \: z: S4 p  [' S& m* V    -------------------------------------------------------------" c% Z. {- B; {! g$ _) v
    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%! ^1 \! J1 U; ]# t& n1 v, O
    -------------------------------------------------------------/ Q+ w) L- w6 _3 r6 L1 R! ~
    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%
2 p9 D% V& i. R" C3 L- ?    -------------------------------------------------------------
. f4 X7 o& ?$ ?0 F. \. ^4 @# ]    >>
! O7 x( ?7 d; p" {
" V6 `9 B! r) Z: R* p: `    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
: U; l9 L& k$ H0 t0 o( u9 ^in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint) f6 q$ A" Q0 E6 q0 _7 v" z' ?! K, s
John and Victoria.
1 b% M& C6 W$ |. U3 A% e9 t2 {7 `* x3 x( f
    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
/ l( W2 u# _3 T4 G- b/ Hcomprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
  W) G" ~& ^+ u8 E  \" G) Lhousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release3 K+ H& V8 c# P5 y
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price3 S! d7 j( j6 D; V1 G
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
" H3 L3 h+ T! Q+ ~across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is5 |9 B% A  h7 I% ^1 J2 x
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current* Q8 o1 y. y$ s  h7 u. ^
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
/ ?" h5 I+ M0 i! `3 Pversion of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
/ c  A3 }8 ^$ F- QNovember 15, 2006.  O: R5 K6 F# S2 k" b1 r: b
    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
' v' }$ v) W; `% efair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge9 D" L" w5 y2 x( l  u! o8 h
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
" p8 D# |3 k. ^; s" W( _9 Uavailable for some areas back to the early 1970s.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-5-1 04:34 , Processed in 0.139882 second(s), 10 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表