 鲜花( 5)  鸡蛋( 0)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2014-2-24 10:13
|
显示全部楼层
本帖最后由 爱逛公园 于 2014-2-24 10:16 编辑
& i. y4 o: h; Z9 F; ]8 O$ n+ O0 M& s4 g$ e" N
我不懂,不过我的理据是基于简单的数学。假如我没有以前剩下的10,000额度,我2013年收到的Notice of Asseement 就会是:* k0 b3 N/ i! N2 G* K0 B
5 u, B. u; L5 |5 E, z& T3 P$ }# q% @0 o8 n
- g' Y" u! ^( Y5 T. k
7 L' T. n# z) q% i( P3 S
4 l) a/ |# {1 }; ]' [
) `) l, J8 D6 g3 g! B(1) RRSP deduction limit for 2012 $0
/ i! N G& f/ ^(2) Minus: Allowable RRSP contributions deducted for 2012 $0( b' U4 @9 Z/ C
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------( s2 T2 m- v# I8 ]( ^
(3) Unused RRSP deduction limit at the end of 2012 $0
! U' S) t6 M) N, Z7 Y* B6 `1 W5 B, ]
6 H B+ y0 E$ t(4) Plus: 18% of 2012 earned income of $5,000
6 K, `# ~% `# w(5) Minus: 2012 pension adjustment $4,000 $1,000
9 d. v$ r( w+ K. A----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- D& P" `" M* @( S
(6) $1,000
$ Q9 ~: G% k6 R# R6 JMinus: 2013 net past service pension adjustment $0; r* l, s, b) k6 E! H z$ m
Plus: 2013 pension adjustment reversal $0: x/ v. \! b$ U& K' ]2 ~7 f8 r
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
/ l. Y% d* B* ^1 UYour RRSP deduction limit for 2013 $1,000 v- @6 v6 I8 W% a, A/ U+ r
o" ~# b- z* Q假如我2013年有 -
/ `7 e$ n, k, ^( b+ X5 J3 s' g18% of 2013 earned income of $6,000
6 U" L5 k( _( a5 M! f0 u# K6 kMinus: 2013 pension adjustment $5,000
B* p N" R9 e3 S% B8 q
+ W7 o5 e) g" Q象你所说的,难道我要1,000 - 5,000 = - 4,000, 我还欠政府的?pension adjustment 已经在(line #5) 已经减了,同一税项怎么会在同一张表中出现两次。所以我认为不需要再减去pension adjustment。请你解释一下。
1 r3 O. c. `2 |
4 J% q- i6 a, p( |# M" ]$ E. N4 Q如果有人家里也有pension 的,也请提我解解疑。谢谢。 |
|