埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 3566|回复: 0

关于 邮购是否免税的问题 退税表 D6-2-6

[复制链接]
鲜花(2) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2011-9-29 22:42 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Memorandum D6-2-6Refund of Duties and Taxes on Non-Commercial Importations' |3 \1 _5 J" H# y
上面说 非商业 进口 可以免关税?
$ _6 m! Z8 R" j/ M* ^/ o: U
% W: \- t  j% y, a% {; n- M6 C3 g
* O& w* V0 H7 g* C' f( Q  e
http://www.cbsa-asfc.gc.ca/publications/forms-formulaires/b2g.pdf- H0 v( n! q  K7 C0 ^, Q

% \% x) n& \/ z2 P) B( y  z) K3 T* b# e  a7 W0 M4 K
Refund Requests6 f1 V" |# H% `8 O
74. (1) Subject to this section, section 75 and any regulations made under section 81, a person who
4 `2 ]1 ]. n4 F! H. w0 `  r) ?paid duties on any imported goods may, in accordance with subsection (3), apply for a refund of all or part
% ?( k4 Q0 k0 H/ X8 ?0 Qof those duties, and the Minister may grant to that person a refund of all or part of those duties, if6 D6 ^* I% Q  Z: l- r
(a) they have suffered damage, deterioration or destruction at any time from the time of shipment to
" \/ o" F$ s0 [" yCanada to the time of release;
+ i2 e2 _0 t* R3 l1 C1 M, ^! j5 Z(b) the quantity released is less than the quantity in respect of which duties were paid;) b6 W. m; P5 _1 m4 }
(c) they are of a quality inferior to that in respect of which duties were paid;4 P0 P9 n$ c7 q$ ^- i, P4 X. Y
(c.1) the goods were exported from a NAFTA country or from Chile but no claim for preferential, b% ?# V0 g! |, a0 K+ H- p4 {
tariff treatment under NAFTA or no claim for preferential tariff treatment under the CCFTA, as the& z" W) ~& r# T
case may be, was made in respect of those goods at the time they were accounted for under9 g; i# C# F: H! v8 S5 v  ?& {
subsection 32(1), (3) or (5);
: W! V  U( `3 q3 j: C7 o3
  M% c( B/ |6 q$ ?(c.11) the goods were imported from Israel or another CIFTA beneficiary but no claim for/ q* n. v; c# u* A4 \3 K0 S
preferential tariff treatment under CIFTA was made in respect of those goods at the time they are
" P, N2 h4 ?- a) y$ l. daccounted for under subsection 32(1), (3) or (5);4 K+ V# u) |6 A8 H
(d) the calculation of duties owing was based on a clerical, typographical or similar error;: S- C& s$ q5 |8 n' \& F; Q& w* t
(e) the duties were paid or overpaid as a result of an error in the determination under subsection 58(2)3 S+ k0 V- L! u- q& f9 a8 x/ U5 i
of origin (other than in the circumstances described in paragraph (c.1) or (c.11), tariff classification or4 J9 C- D1 M: K6 H1 R# r
value for duty in respect of the goods and the determination has not been the subject of a decision
" y; p7 L- E! U' _, qunder any of sections 59 to 61;
' _4 P. v, {5 e' D(f) [not applicable to non-commercial goods];4 j: o7 }- w) E. T
(g) the duties were overpaid or paid in error for any reason that may be prescribed.7 ]! a6 O6 U- \: J' n  Q9 _
(1.1) The granting of a refund under paragraph (1) (c.1), (c.11), or (e) or (f), if the refund is based6 A' o% E* f% n; b( e3 w0 @( S
on tariff classification, value for duty or origin under paragraph (1)(g) is to be treated for the purposes of7 j2 [" f, L' f
this Act, other than section 66, as if it were a re-determination made under paragraph 59 (1)(a).) `7 s$ @9 J$ }6 ~+ J' e$ o
(2) No refund shall be granted under any of the paragraphs 1(a) to (c) and (d) in respect of a claim
% B% L8 y2 Y7 i4 kunless written notice of the claim and the reason for it is given to an officer within the prescribed time.
1 @0 W# ^5 G* E5 f2 S/ E(3) No refund shall be granted under subsection (1) in respect of a claim unless* v0 ?! o; \9 y2 o' h1 Y5 @
(a) the person making the claim affords an officer reasonable opportunity to examine the goods in
6 u/ @3 P. Z2 Z3 A& U' u) Krespect of which the claim is made or otherwise verify the reason for the claim; and
* a# z! y# R8 }% V( T+ X(b) an application for the refund, including such evidence in support of the application as may be
. N5 U6 D+ g; ^( E3 V: `" Eprescribed, is made to an officer in the prescribed manner and in the prescribed form containing the
" n- U- H7 V5 M8 Bprescribed information within
2 P; e9 e/ D/ w(i) in the case of an application for a refund under paragraph (1)(a), (b), (c), (c.11), (d), (e), (f)
% z+ j! S; ]8 S+ p4 s3 Z* For (g), four years after the goods are accounted for under subsection 32 (1), (3) or (5), and
6 F' H3 M# h* i, s) G(ii) in the case of an application for a refund under paragraph (1)(c.1), one year after the goods
8 B* g2 a* A$ kwere accounted for under subsection 32(1), (3) or (5) or such longer period as may be prescribed.6 l; W0 Q  {, v8 w% \
(4) A denial of an application for a refund of duties paid on goods is to be treated for the purposes of
% \" y8 x1 z9 P# E* L9 {this Act as if it were a re-determination under paragraph 59(1)(a) if, x, O9 I2 B! W4 S% @1 A0 r
(a) the application is for a refund under paragraph (1)(c.1) or (c.11) and the application is denied. e  Q2 ~% [" _, A
because at the time the goods were accounted for under subsection 32(1), (3) or (5), they were not
) b" F$ S" ]3 Xeligible for preferential tariff treatment under a free trade agreement; or$ {& c) ?& u. ~" ^
(b) the application is for a refund under paragraph (1)(e), (f) or (g) and the application is denied6 y, j& Q* U3 |0 ~
because the origin, tariff classification or value for duty of the goods as claimed in the application is1 h, X6 S2 C( J# q! N: O1 w
incorrect.6 g& t( s9 V: B$ o# B7 b( v
(5) For greater certainty, a denial of an application for a refund under paragraph (1)(c.1), (c.11), (e),
6 \7 o: X- |2 _% q4 V2 b(f) or (g) on the basis that complete or accurate documentation has not been provided, or on any ground2 F9 t& g* M: O1 E- {
other than the ground specified in subsection (4), is not to be treated for the purposes of this Act as if it4 f9 H% ^6 S0 S9 K
were a re-determination under this Act of origin, tariff classification or value for duty.
8 t! r0 S: M- {
4 o/ a8 e* U/ `. j这到底是说可以还是不可以啊?
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-9-2 12:42 , Processed in 0.193486 second(s), 10 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表