埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 3150|回复: 0

关于 邮购是否免税的问题 退税表 D6-2-6

[复制链接]
鲜花(2) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2011-9-29 22:42 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Memorandum D6-2-6Refund of Duties and Taxes on Non-Commercial Importations
! S* J9 ]  E! l& b' {& q上面说 非商业 进口 可以免关税?
( S+ S1 A  j/ F1 a6 D- p0 Y3 c
! H; W; }' r# y  }0 S
& U! _  V& Y( z0 ^

" ?5 v/ R* d, K) g- c# w4 |4 {% chttp://www.cbsa-asfc.gc.ca/publications/forms-formulaires/b2g.pdf& z$ t  @5 S4 _* c- ~' C
& {' L, r6 g+ j. J; |0 g8 R* }
  J  F1 y2 [. k6 g- k: Y
Refund Requests
- a$ y. ?9 |+ P% S: l74. (1) Subject to this section, section 75 and any regulations made under section 81, a person who, L  D$ u. T# O0 a# j
paid duties on any imported goods may, in accordance with subsection (3), apply for a refund of all or part' Y4 D5 f3 c8 d7 M) Y
of those duties, and the Minister may grant to that person a refund of all or part of those duties, if
9 `2 n# N  I) d- `(a) they have suffered damage, deterioration or destruction at any time from the time of shipment to
1 k2 q4 H: N7 C6 ZCanada to the time of release;
. ^0 e7 H) [( L! w7 f(b) the quantity released is less than the quantity in respect of which duties were paid;- {! _0 @" v7 i& x
(c) they are of a quality inferior to that in respect of which duties were paid;
& F0 K2 F/ q$ R0 k5 _7 @(c.1) the goods were exported from a NAFTA country or from Chile but no claim for preferential1 V* ]" q; P: o0 ]) w; ]7 y
tariff treatment under NAFTA or no claim for preferential tariff treatment under the CCFTA, as the* r1 p% j: F1 }, e  {6 k
case may be, was made in respect of those goods at the time they were accounted for under2 s& ?: y- }) w/ k4 f
subsection 32(1), (3) or (5);
( h5 y' ~6 l$ ~9 C& R3 c" p3
2 t: O& J# s' W7 c( o* e(c.11) the goods were imported from Israel or another CIFTA beneficiary but no claim for  Z/ }5 r- E9 h$ c- q% c3 M
preferential tariff treatment under CIFTA was made in respect of those goods at the time they are/ t2 j5 ]; u7 D  M
accounted for under subsection 32(1), (3) or (5);9 r& r% ~) [5 z/ r3 f
(d) the calculation of duties owing was based on a clerical, typographical or similar error;
( J4 W1 V) }3 t  F" ?(e) the duties were paid or overpaid as a result of an error in the determination under subsection 58(2)9 K4 Z; W+ O$ l8 K" s. U- ?
of origin (other than in the circumstances described in paragraph (c.1) or (c.11), tariff classification or2 g0 c! O! }  X
value for duty in respect of the goods and the determination has not been the subject of a decision
8 `0 ~6 y8 i4 _5 m! q) P6 Punder any of sections 59 to 61;2 I8 w- \: Z8 \0 W
(f) [not applicable to non-commercial goods];
" M' k5 T2 J0 x' Q3 P(g) the duties were overpaid or paid in error for any reason that may be prescribed.
/ ~+ P; R/ {7 n1 F/ n8 S5 Q5 Z% \$ ^(1.1) The granting of a refund under paragraph (1) (c.1), (c.11), or (e) or (f), if the refund is based. |" t' f# k8 Z! E+ x
on tariff classification, value for duty or origin under paragraph (1)(g) is to be treated for the purposes of
( r  @( s+ Q3 L0 X/ u; \this Act, other than section 66, as if it were a re-determination made under paragraph 59 (1)(a).+ @  O4 @( }, m
(2) No refund shall be granted under any of the paragraphs 1(a) to (c) and (d) in respect of a claim' `3 g' W0 p$ d+ N  P- A: e* \
unless written notice of the claim and the reason for it is given to an officer within the prescribed time.
) `0 M8 P0 i7 S" j. o/ `(3) No refund shall be granted under subsection (1) in respect of a claim unless0 v. Z2 x6 x6 F5 n
(a) the person making the claim affords an officer reasonable opportunity to examine the goods in
" Y0 o4 N8 ~0 n, `* o1 k) ^3 lrespect of which the claim is made or otherwise verify the reason for the claim; and$ c' p( `- \0 S- j$ ^! ^
(b) an application for the refund, including such evidence in support of the application as may be5 Q3 K! d# }( Z, a
prescribed, is made to an officer in the prescribed manner and in the prescribed form containing the/ K( I/ F- K( S! m) z
prescribed information within
: K' C/ ?/ v( z5 u0 \! U4 _- x(i) in the case of an application for a refund under paragraph (1)(a), (b), (c), (c.11), (d), (e), (f), s6 a" b; q1 ^; g9 o
or (g), four years after the goods are accounted for under subsection 32 (1), (3) or (5), and
- A( z6 n; \' H7 o6 s/ Z(ii) in the case of an application for a refund under paragraph (1)(c.1), one year after the goods
3 f* [9 l( r% a/ G  l; Nwere accounted for under subsection 32(1), (3) or (5) or such longer period as may be prescribed.
, L5 p# x2 j* K/ R) m, U(4) A denial of an application for a refund of duties paid on goods is to be treated for the purposes of+ {4 }3 J- ~) E
this Act as if it were a re-determination under paragraph 59(1)(a) if
0 X9 M" Z4 M6 h" y(a) the application is for a refund under paragraph (1)(c.1) or (c.11) and the application is denied1 y  M! h) e. V- F
because at the time the goods were accounted for under subsection 32(1), (3) or (5), they were not* K4 e8 S) _& Z5 T  j# m, r, B
eligible for preferential tariff treatment under a free trade agreement; or
, X+ u  u5 F9 T& H/ z4 C5 b7 u(b) the application is for a refund under paragraph (1)(e), (f) or (g) and the application is denied- ^2 N; w& W3 ?( k5 j
because the origin, tariff classification or value for duty of the goods as claimed in the application is" ?( N' ^" B0 w
incorrect./ R/ _* b7 v  D" n+ E
(5) For greater certainty, a denial of an application for a refund under paragraph (1)(c.1), (c.11), (e),3 P# o9 `  s! W
(f) or (g) on the basis that complete or accurate documentation has not been provided, or on any ground" P& ^7 u. w4 ^" \. h2 S
other than the ground specified in subsection (4), is not to be treated for the purposes of this Act as if it! B7 C/ L. B) y. Q: e
were a re-determination under this Act of origin, tariff classification or value for duty.
; f. {5 A- h' e  t; X4 |2 D" N' U% s  r6 H0 w
这到底是说可以还是不可以啊?
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-7-19 13:29 , Processed in 2.465677 second(s), 9 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表