 鲜花( 2)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Memorandum D6-2-6Refund of Duties and Taxes on Non-Commercial Importations
" d) K+ a7 x* q8 p: ~ M! T5 l上面说 非商业 进口 可以免关税?$ ?; `3 f1 L5 \% g2 t
7 P. {( i+ C+ G l' A
( F0 a" f+ {6 ]: a2 O9 ?& \2 S
) y2 Y* X% ^7 Rhttp://www.cbsa-asfc.gc.ca/publications/forms-formulaires/b2g.pdf
! ]0 c3 N Z2 ^; E, a( \0 g3 e1 M% @% Q% O* j* q/ g
1 j- \0 ~) b7 |Refund Requests4 i; A7 t0 f- }% J$ F
74. (1) Subject to this section, section 75 and any regulations made under section 81, a person who
' r7 \5 b0 S, f/ X0 e7 spaid duties on any imported goods may, in accordance with subsection (3), apply for a refund of all or part
, F% y1 I Z: x& A2 O+ h9 Bof those duties, and the Minister may grant to that person a refund of all or part of those duties, if
! d; w7 w2 j( A1 k(a) they have suffered damage, deterioration or destruction at any time from the time of shipment to
, e1 S, F6 g1 D5 r( {# ICanada to the time of release;
8 {3 y& k6 K, t: `% Z3 u$ X(b) the quantity released is less than the quantity in respect of which duties were paid;
- a6 {5 K0 G# ~3 q(c) they are of a quality inferior to that in respect of which duties were paid;8 x9 T6 D+ ]. H1 e
(c.1) the goods were exported from a NAFTA country or from Chile but no claim for preferential
$ Y, S4 h( u; G2 n* Q6 z9 ?tariff treatment under NAFTA or no claim for preferential tariff treatment under the CCFTA, as the% B" u0 Q4 E9 N9 E) c& u
case may be, was made in respect of those goods at the time they were accounted for under
U3 g. x: a n# Rsubsection 32(1), (3) or (5);8 h; l1 m" J. B
37 i: Y! q% u y- K
(c.11) the goods were imported from Israel or another CIFTA beneficiary but no claim for
: D8 D9 s0 l( |% wpreferential tariff treatment under CIFTA was made in respect of those goods at the time they are
7 _/ i2 z3 H, k: |! p0 ]( faccounted for under subsection 32(1), (3) or (5);
" R2 ? o; G" o# e: g(d) the calculation of duties owing was based on a clerical, typographical or similar error;
, H! A1 `) C0 M(e) the duties were paid or overpaid as a result of an error in the determination under subsection 58(2)
/ J2 L! S, H$ A( Z6 r- Iof origin (other than in the circumstances described in paragraph (c.1) or (c.11), tariff classification or& } `: h* ^) g* v
value for duty in respect of the goods and the determination has not been the subject of a decision
3 Z3 \+ |( a7 v0 V" ?under any of sections 59 to 61;1 {5 _, }: q% y* s" [! J5 q, p4 B
(f) [not applicable to non-commercial goods];5 N" g& {5 D2 T4 M4 m$ b. F; C7 ~0 z" Y
(g) the duties were overpaid or paid in error for any reason that may be prescribed.0 l Q1 Z2 d4 `
(1.1) The granting of a refund under paragraph (1) (c.1), (c.11), or (e) or (f), if the refund is based& i, \; q! k8 k1 I3 E6 r3 C
on tariff classification, value for duty or origin under paragraph (1)(g) is to be treated for the purposes of+ J. f4 L8 o& |/ n* ~
this Act, other than section 66, as if it were a re-determination made under paragraph 59 (1)(a).
4 D3 n. A% t1 ^4 c(2) No refund shall be granted under any of the paragraphs 1(a) to (c) and (d) in respect of a claim0 V6 y N4 C: w2 { k* m
unless written notice of the claim and the reason for it is given to an officer within the prescribed time.
- E9 m0 D, Q$ {+ b" ^5 @" H(3) No refund shall be granted under subsection (1) in respect of a claim unless2 K ~/ S" @0 s1 Y" T* b0 n0 E! ~( h
(a) the person making the claim affords an officer reasonable opportunity to examine the goods in
8 g% U5 R' e6 r+ [$ e* H" x. Xrespect of which the claim is made or otherwise verify the reason for the claim; and4 i) W% U: g! F; h S9 I
(b) an application for the refund, including such evidence in support of the application as may be
7 L. b) e7 g) h. L" Q4 ^2 {: c! Y5 xprescribed, is made to an officer in the prescribed manner and in the prescribed form containing the5 r7 _7 u$ t3 K& X& E
prescribed information within
! a* V+ Q; O# M4 p3 P& y) ^7 @(i) in the case of an application for a refund under paragraph (1)(a), (b), (c), (c.11), (d), (e), (f)- ~0 M6 f" ]% ~8 j: W
or (g), four years after the goods are accounted for under subsection 32 (1), (3) or (5), and# {6 C* @0 W* t0 n
(ii) in the case of an application for a refund under paragraph (1)(c.1), one year after the goods
( a" L) o- `% X9 L5 [0 h5 p9 pwere accounted for under subsection 32(1), (3) or (5) or such longer period as may be prescribed.7 }) F( N: \8 [
(4) A denial of an application for a refund of duties paid on goods is to be treated for the purposes of" u3 L( z+ g, P1 ]" _6 b
this Act as if it were a re-determination under paragraph 59(1)(a) if c6 `( F+ ]# [ u! a* T
(a) the application is for a refund under paragraph (1)(c.1) or (c.11) and the application is denied
) y8 p6 U0 I$ o- z' Tbecause at the time the goods were accounted for under subsection 32(1), (3) or (5), they were not% ~2 S) ?+ v) }. I/ `1 u1 y& A
eligible for preferential tariff treatment under a free trade agreement; or# p) X4 J0 r/ P! m+ y: s6 B5 N/ }# K
(b) the application is for a refund under paragraph (1)(e), (f) or (g) and the application is denied
1 a* D: ?5 g1 J; l1 L1 ]because the origin, tariff classification or value for duty of the goods as claimed in the application is' m" C+ h9 Y! @# X& a2 s
incorrect.$ k* `% M" L0 ^7 Z' j, s( c
(5) For greater certainty, a denial of an application for a refund under paragraph (1)(c.1), (c.11), (e),! e0 q" a( Z- h2 M+ \
(f) or (g) on the basis that complete or accurate documentation has not been provided, or on any ground$ a j% b$ X# C. M
other than the ground specified in subsection (4), is not to be treated for the purposes of this Act as if it
9 N3 L' y; v3 Y$ ~# p* l3 Owere a re-determination under this Act of origin, tariff classification or value for duty.
: V1 S b O5 k8 T2 |: ^. Z/ i$ @" f2 K; X# m8 j V' G& d
这到底是说可以还是不可以啊? |
|