埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2814|回复: 0

关于 邮购是否免税的问题 退税表 D6-2-6

[复制链接]
鲜花(2) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2011-9-29 22:42 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Memorandum D6-2-6Refund of Duties and Taxes on Non-Commercial Importations
) `, c* ^, T) k' c上面说 非商业 进口 可以免关税?
. D" V* n9 \' T. |' @
: G% A& e% I: f2 S; X- s, z" M
) h4 m' k& ~" c, e1 j4 R

4 x  M5 l3 X* P! J0 K5 z8 d' @# l! xhttp://www.cbsa-asfc.gc.ca/publications/forms-formulaires/b2g.pdf
  o) q7 s, O. O9 w9 v. Z. |; S0 v

( O& V) T0 S3 M. v5 E1 i% IRefund Requests2 I. c/ b  {/ x/ p, Y
74. (1) Subject to this section, section 75 and any regulations made under section 81, a person who- t1 E* z$ X4 J! c$ B. }
paid duties on any imported goods may, in accordance with subsection (3), apply for a refund of all or part
, J8 ~' l) k$ y" X9 c4 }: `of those duties, and the Minister may grant to that person a refund of all or part of those duties, if
! e, ^' l+ x8 f4 ^# u* s(a) they have suffered damage, deterioration or destruction at any time from the time of shipment to6 S: u& a/ M6 j" C7 @0 K
Canada to the time of release;
5 g5 U6 J2 R* F) S! O! F(b) the quantity released is less than the quantity in respect of which duties were paid;* U4 |: K- E3 v, ^
(c) they are of a quality inferior to that in respect of which duties were paid;' K0 g( p5 G6 a, L7 ]. C& g# u+ X
(c.1) the goods were exported from a NAFTA country or from Chile but no claim for preferential5 V  i5 V  `. R& f0 M' X9 p
tariff treatment under NAFTA or no claim for preferential tariff treatment under the CCFTA, as the5 s; n6 X1 I" V4 B7 a
case may be, was made in respect of those goods at the time they were accounted for under$ F/ }( D" W- G' H' d
subsection 32(1), (3) or (5);6 a% s$ Y8 x7 S% k3 O1 r
3
# R% r% d) t: _0 d. u(c.11) the goods were imported from Israel or another CIFTA beneficiary but no claim for
/ A+ c/ j. j6 _2 ]/ f! t7 npreferential tariff treatment under CIFTA was made in respect of those goods at the time they are
7 J1 X9 j2 _( B9 }% q+ a2 D, Maccounted for under subsection 32(1), (3) or (5);2 a/ o' h- j% R
(d) the calculation of duties owing was based on a clerical, typographical or similar error;
' A+ c( c5 N, C+ z(e) the duties were paid or overpaid as a result of an error in the determination under subsection 58(2)( p0 s! H" z* q! u5 a/ O
of origin (other than in the circumstances described in paragraph (c.1) or (c.11), tariff classification or% r: P2 }$ ?! ?7 a. ~
value for duty in respect of the goods and the determination has not been the subject of a decision8 ]1 l, [/ G* V$ T
under any of sections 59 to 61;
* x7 d" i7 Y+ E8 c(f) [not applicable to non-commercial goods];
. [: @5 b" w. L- O0 }+ ~(g) the duties were overpaid or paid in error for any reason that may be prescribed.
6 H. m% [, ?. `(1.1) The granting of a refund under paragraph (1) (c.1), (c.11), or (e) or (f), if the refund is based
4 |2 X- b: r4 G2 bon tariff classification, value for duty or origin under paragraph (1)(g) is to be treated for the purposes of; B( j  A7 ]# T+ W. S
this Act, other than section 66, as if it were a re-determination made under paragraph 59 (1)(a).
6 c  Y' u! R: V, P/ C$ Z! R0 q(2) No refund shall be granted under any of the paragraphs 1(a) to (c) and (d) in respect of a claim
! s6 ~, T3 r1 |unless written notice of the claim and the reason for it is given to an officer within the prescribed time.
; ?" g# V& `0 D1 M2 P* Y4 q/ N& H(3) No refund shall be granted under subsection (1) in respect of a claim unless3 r8 E2 h( u! b/ z: w, U1 P
(a) the person making the claim affords an officer reasonable opportunity to examine the goods in
) C, y' @, f5 E$ Lrespect of which the claim is made or otherwise verify the reason for the claim; and
+ e9 G) O8 M6 [$ p(b) an application for the refund, including such evidence in support of the application as may be
5 s( |8 e6 @2 l( [/ F: m! ]# Aprescribed, is made to an officer in the prescribed manner and in the prescribed form containing the
6 \( H7 B0 e* m' `! r, `8 d0 ^- _prescribed information within; ~' b0 @9 ~+ p8 w" y
(i) in the case of an application for a refund under paragraph (1)(a), (b), (c), (c.11), (d), (e), (f)
! m. |% g: f0 {: m' F8 t- b* Tor (g), four years after the goods are accounted for under subsection 32 (1), (3) or (5), and9 X$ H; n- v" F
(ii) in the case of an application for a refund under paragraph (1)(c.1), one year after the goods! ^0 V' I9 O7 ^
were accounted for under subsection 32(1), (3) or (5) or such longer period as may be prescribed.
! F9 m! I! m5 ]! F1 G' V(4) A denial of an application for a refund of duties paid on goods is to be treated for the purposes of
  }6 ~  j) e8 M0 V! V6 Y6 @& wthis Act as if it were a re-determination under paragraph 59(1)(a) if
( A1 z/ ]9 ?- B3 Q) ~(a) the application is for a refund under paragraph (1)(c.1) or (c.11) and the application is denied4 c" s: [' v; H2 L
because at the time the goods were accounted for under subsection 32(1), (3) or (5), they were not
; G1 ]3 i- c5 x; \1 v9 K9 oeligible for preferential tariff treatment under a free trade agreement; or) Q+ K  N0 ]  |$ O. W8 _
(b) the application is for a refund under paragraph (1)(e), (f) or (g) and the application is denied
3 m7 ]3 b" E; bbecause the origin, tariff classification or value for duty of the goods as claimed in the application is* ~6 t# B9 C# U2 R8 P
incorrect.6 @# Y! Y& C8 p* N( d
(5) For greater certainty, a denial of an application for a refund under paragraph (1)(c.1), (c.11), (e),+ P9 [. b$ z& d# s9 w% Q+ W1 ?) [
(f) or (g) on the basis that complete or accurate documentation has not been provided, or on any ground
- Q0 F4 D1 V) o# q2 Dother than the ground specified in subsection (4), is not to be treated for the purposes of this Act as if it3 C3 u# T  x, x
were a re-determination under this Act of origin, tariff classification or value for duty.
$ E. o: F# @4 h' t( h# `
% G* I& {, f) u这到底是说可以还是不可以啊?
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-6-11 08:45 , Processed in 0.109848 second(s), 10 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表