埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2528|回复: 0

关于 邮购是否免税的问题 退税表 D6-2-6

[复制链接]
鲜花(2) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2011-9-29 22:42 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Memorandum D6-2-6Refund of Duties and Taxes on Non-Commercial Importations
- c3 P$ F; u) _' k% ?9 f+ \上面说 非商业 进口 可以免关税?. ^5 d: f9 P* V9 i! F

! H! v/ @/ U, ~4 M  F: j; b! ~' M$ \) ~0 ]

( p! x' @" |1 h) x! ]: Z; f$ Uhttp://www.cbsa-asfc.gc.ca/publications/forms-formulaires/b2g.pdf
! f& ~! T- h: N  e  G
5 P' u2 V) r' y# p! P7 M) t6 R9 [9 \
Refund Requests0 h+ e) y7 T* g. ^
74. (1) Subject to this section, section 75 and any regulations made under section 81, a person who
. `4 |" Y; `, H( z* g2 dpaid duties on any imported goods may, in accordance with subsection (3), apply for a refund of all or part7 m- k$ a; r; {/ V8 J: e6 o
of those duties, and the Minister may grant to that person a refund of all or part of those duties, if
3 u$ w' r% v$ ~(a) they have suffered damage, deterioration or destruction at any time from the time of shipment to/ @- s3 z6 U# \" a! p/ D4 a
Canada to the time of release;
% B, f$ s5 }+ L& H(b) the quantity released is less than the quantity in respect of which duties were paid;. c* \  T7 }3 E/ Y- [7 f9 v0 T
(c) they are of a quality inferior to that in respect of which duties were paid;
3 ?6 w  F. N" N$ Q(c.1) the goods were exported from a NAFTA country or from Chile but no claim for preferential
" G5 D6 O% o* x8 ktariff treatment under NAFTA or no claim for preferential tariff treatment under the CCFTA, as the" ~; y5 K) ~7 u/ C% Q6 Z
case may be, was made in respect of those goods at the time they were accounted for under; N& F  @" W0 W/ q
subsection 32(1), (3) or (5);" o2 L4 n* y$ H- R( i
3$ s( u! Q( z6 l( h
(c.11) the goods were imported from Israel or another CIFTA beneficiary but no claim for5 J. K3 x$ `* [& E/ ]( a8 d  |
preferential tariff treatment under CIFTA was made in respect of those goods at the time they are" j3 c/ W& h1 B  H5 @
accounted for under subsection 32(1), (3) or (5);9 p% K. p' g$ q
(d) the calculation of duties owing was based on a clerical, typographical or similar error;. t; z8 _2 A( {* B% P
(e) the duties were paid or overpaid as a result of an error in the determination under subsection 58(2)5 }! B8 N7 Q$ V9 A, }
of origin (other than in the circumstances described in paragraph (c.1) or (c.11), tariff classification or
0 D" |1 ?- W  rvalue for duty in respect of the goods and the determination has not been the subject of a decision; R2 h) H) a0 S9 q2 W) X4 H
under any of sections 59 to 61;
/ ^( g& V5 L; }/ s( y(f) [not applicable to non-commercial goods];: V, f& f  t- N2 d% y9 e2 }! M- j
(g) the duties were overpaid or paid in error for any reason that may be prescribed.
2 w* i/ r! I( i(1.1) The granting of a refund under paragraph (1) (c.1), (c.11), or (e) or (f), if the refund is based8 h5 V& |  J3 ?7 s+ d+ y
on tariff classification, value for duty or origin under paragraph (1)(g) is to be treated for the purposes of3 n- `0 ^+ G- ~% C  Y# h6 i* `
this Act, other than section 66, as if it were a re-determination made under paragraph 59 (1)(a).
0 ]) W! g1 p7 H$ \1 h3 _+ ^(2) No refund shall be granted under any of the paragraphs 1(a) to (c) and (d) in respect of a claim4 a1 @! F0 y7 o: f9 J5 f
unless written notice of the claim and the reason for it is given to an officer within the prescribed time.
6 v4 V! R; o2 `(3) No refund shall be granted under subsection (1) in respect of a claim unless
" x4 z9 u# A0 \9 D(a) the person making the claim affords an officer reasonable opportunity to examine the goods in
6 e# m  A6 L0 y  o2 u3 E* Z! Prespect of which the claim is made or otherwise verify the reason for the claim; and& Y  g( I9 I: S9 }, `2 u# j4 e
(b) an application for the refund, including such evidence in support of the application as may be
8 |) e0 T% g) A& O! \! |& Gprescribed, is made to an officer in the prescribed manner and in the prescribed form containing the
4 Y( t$ n# [* J3 S( Pprescribed information within
2 J4 \3 D: E5 K4 ~- g" [1 f$ O(i) in the case of an application for a refund under paragraph (1)(a), (b), (c), (c.11), (d), (e), (f)
+ i. i0 ~/ e' l4 Z8 C7 |0 `" ior (g), four years after the goods are accounted for under subsection 32 (1), (3) or (5), and
  r7 ^/ i- Y+ ~* P(ii) in the case of an application for a refund under paragraph (1)(c.1), one year after the goods9 \: [2 o+ g" V$ n
were accounted for under subsection 32(1), (3) or (5) or such longer period as may be prescribed.
3 ]3 W- U9 h8 k$ ]9 ^(4) A denial of an application for a refund of duties paid on goods is to be treated for the purposes of8 @; {7 D2 _- M' }7 O$ }: ^
this Act as if it were a re-determination under paragraph 59(1)(a) if" R7 Q1 r  o! g( y
(a) the application is for a refund under paragraph (1)(c.1) or (c.11) and the application is denied
3 b: ]# G/ H/ F8 F6 @0 o9 Nbecause at the time the goods were accounted for under subsection 32(1), (3) or (5), they were not7 y; @8 I9 C' _& ]# F
eligible for preferential tariff treatment under a free trade agreement; or
3 [& r1 G8 t* V; C(b) the application is for a refund under paragraph (1)(e), (f) or (g) and the application is denied
1 }9 _3 @4 ^: J. O0 E$ Wbecause the origin, tariff classification or value for duty of the goods as claimed in the application is
$ R" H: O. Z- a3 \$ \' hincorrect.
3 _3 o' F0 R- x(5) For greater certainty, a denial of an application for a refund under paragraph (1)(c.1), (c.11), (e),
3 T+ `9 [5 C& ^' C9 @(f) or (g) on the basis that complete or accurate documentation has not been provided, or on any ground% K- Y. {0 A/ U8 }8 i
other than the ground specified in subsection (4), is not to be treated for the purposes of this Act as if it
+ @  c( Y1 O/ `5 }) t% pwere a re-determination under this Act of origin, tariff classification or value for duty.5 I. O% @' k+ F% A) f" l* [

- I5 y$ u( a+ o- m8 P这到底是说可以还是不可以啊?
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-4-18 07:36 , Processed in 0.069596 second(s), 10 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表