埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 3251|回复: 0

关于 邮购是否免税的问题 退税表 D6-2-6

[复制链接]
鲜花(2) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2011-9-29 22:42 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Memorandum D6-2-6Refund of Duties and Taxes on Non-Commercial Importations
) a" M7 j: @) k. l9 L' N; G上面说 非商业 进口 可以免关税?) T" m. X9 g6 C+ c

9 T: v: c6 A; Y0 H! N/ O  {; }9 u' z# d
% v5 c: X8 ^) b6 |
http://www.cbsa-asfc.gc.ca/publications/forms-formulaires/b2g.pdf# m/ t0 b; |5 B, F! c  i. o
1 B5 ]+ s7 Z$ o. X, g) t2 S
- Y4 p# ~5 |7 O0 y
Refund Requests
8 f3 N7 D2 D8 |1 y& H74. (1) Subject to this section, section 75 and any regulations made under section 81, a person who4 {3 H, R/ z$ z4 }3 l/ P
paid duties on any imported goods may, in accordance with subsection (3), apply for a refund of all or part
1 s5 U3 H) {  f. U/ Z, oof those duties, and the Minister may grant to that person a refund of all or part of those duties, if8 T2 j7 _$ p! }( O  U  h6 V
(a) they have suffered damage, deterioration or destruction at any time from the time of shipment to; d+ L7 @- o1 b2 X
Canada to the time of release;3 n- `5 _' c' p( V# u
(b) the quantity released is less than the quantity in respect of which duties were paid;
! a, V! E, ], o( u: d# m' G(c) they are of a quality inferior to that in respect of which duties were paid;2 Z. F' c( S. M0 ]0 }% l* C
(c.1) the goods were exported from a NAFTA country or from Chile but no claim for preferential) C; I3 p) ]' t6 ]2 S
tariff treatment under NAFTA or no claim for preferential tariff treatment under the CCFTA, as the9 d+ u! Q2 B5 Y. b
case may be, was made in respect of those goods at the time they were accounted for under/ C% C5 `- R! l" C
subsection 32(1), (3) or (5);6 P0 \2 n2 z$ a+ M. @, F
3
7 f0 D% O& k+ R2 i(c.11) the goods were imported from Israel or another CIFTA beneficiary but no claim for
0 \8 b9 V4 N) ?0 M  W- Y6 Upreferential tariff treatment under CIFTA was made in respect of those goods at the time they are
$ T4 D/ N5 ~& o! r2 q1 W: V$ Taccounted for under subsection 32(1), (3) or (5);
0 V7 [' b+ |5 X( |/ m. v* L, c(d) the calculation of duties owing was based on a clerical, typographical or similar error;
6 W$ K" U: @+ B1 D4 B; D# X(e) the duties were paid or overpaid as a result of an error in the determination under subsection 58(2)2 {/ w! w1 F( n& i
of origin (other than in the circumstances described in paragraph (c.1) or (c.11), tariff classification or: n2 j3 W% Y. K: U) J
value for duty in respect of the goods and the determination has not been the subject of a decision
- ], L' {) H- R( |7 ]4 sunder any of sections 59 to 61;
" M0 f2 P7 {) M' Z) m7 D4 M- N(f) [not applicable to non-commercial goods];
  a+ }- b3 Z4 ^+ L2 }  [(g) the duties were overpaid or paid in error for any reason that may be prescribed.8 v9 q. N  q; f6 f, o$ l
(1.1) The granting of a refund under paragraph (1) (c.1), (c.11), or (e) or (f), if the refund is based2 s+ h( O6 Y$ X  d; i
on tariff classification, value for duty or origin under paragraph (1)(g) is to be treated for the purposes of
$ A, {8 V. s1 a$ P- b. Q9 H' uthis Act, other than section 66, as if it were a re-determination made under paragraph 59 (1)(a).
# n6 r, W0 h# H2 D/ A( ^4 o/ T(2) No refund shall be granted under any of the paragraphs 1(a) to (c) and (d) in respect of a claim
2 J# r2 r7 F; {' t8 _' m* \unless written notice of the claim and the reason for it is given to an officer within the prescribed time./ }6 F! z- r& j+ a
(3) No refund shall be granted under subsection (1) in respect of a claim unless- d. Y" P1 I$ W$ y; {" [
(a) the person making the claim affords an officer reasonable opportunity to examine the goods in3 V  b) r# E) x9 C- F$ S
respect of which the claim is made or otherwise verify the reason for the claim; and
( `$ n4 P, n/ ^(b) an application for the refund, including such evidence in support of the application as may be
- D" u5 B6 j: v3 o# c& y& k( Iprescribed, is made to an officer in the prescribed manner and in the prescribed form containing the
6 Q4 t1 ?+ ^# k3 Q4 T/ D: T, Gprescribed information within
% F9 w0 t) w9 w& B2 x* X(i) in the case of an application for a refund under paragraph (1)(a), (b), (c), (c.11), (d), (e), (f): j# h/ Y* Q5 h! M5 G( Y
or (g), four years after the goods are accounted for under subsection 32 (1), (3) or (5), and
% @3 o2 u* `8 ^(ii) in the case of an application for a refund under paragraph (1)(c.1), one year after the goods
; Q" `3 x% }" F& I% iwere accounted for under subsection 32(1), (3) or (5) or such longer period as may be prescribed.4 [$ `2 L; M4 r9 W- _8 B
(4) A denial of an application for a refund of duties paid on goods is to be treated for the purposes of
6 y! a6 E/ k2 V7 @this Act as if it were a re-determination under paragraph 59(1)(a) if5 P; E: R( Y8 K& t) W$ ?7 c, ?
(a) the application is for a refund under paragraph (1)(c.1) or (c.11) and the application is denied
/ n/ b" S" M0 m  jbecause at the time the goods were accounted for under subsection 32(1), (3) or (5), they were not$ k7 ~4 j( w* k, O
eligible for preferential tariff treatment under a free trade agreement; or( {4 Z( D: U2 Z
(b) the application is for a refund under paragraph (1)(e), (f) or (g) and the application is denied
7 C: ~2 p* b; n2 S4 pbecause the origin, tariff classification or value for duty of the goods as claimed in the application is
7 I+ D8 J9 w# r; Cincorrect.
& x9 b# r9 c& S(5) For greater certainty, a denial of an application for a refund under paragraph (1)(c.1), (c.11), (e),
: }$ T1 z% [- W3 _, o3 v(f) or (g) on the basis that complete or accurate documentation has not been provided, or on any ground5 W  {) T+ L* ~( t+ e! o# q/ j. [
other than the ground specified in subsection (4), is not to be treated for the purposes of this Act as if it( [) H' Q# p; Z
were a re-determination under this Act of origin, tariff classification or value for duty.1 `1 Z/ {. m# x4 q
5 ~# G! G# p& G7 O' R2 j
这到底是说可以还是不可以啊?
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-7-30 02:00 , Processed in 0.191124 second(s), 10 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表