 鲜花( 21)  鸡蛋( 0)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2010-10-5 20:41
|
显示全部楼层
正好刚看到一个类似的问题在别的英文论坛:
M) x$ s, S8 o5 I8 h
4 g2 Z1 s" U% f* ?6 b8 I$ OF4 IS Vs. F2.8 non IS, 贴过来大家都评论评论。' ]# b5 S# z9 z
, b+ u9 s0 ]6 ^/ L
**********************************% g0 L( G$ c" Z* K, W1 x
Anyhow, you pose a good question - f/4 IS or f/2.8 non IS. Here are the main points:
2 Q5 e4 L5 T/ q' w1 j# O! i. E/ ~9 Q, p0 S; s1 s0 x& r; d) h2 k$ C
1) The f/2.8 gives you one extra stop of hand-holding possibility, but at the cost of depth of field, whereas the 4.0 gives you 3 stops of hand-holding possibility at any aperture. Winner: f/4.0 m- v2 c9 q; z2 f
6 |* g( U0 c3 B- n! W
2) The f/2.8 gives you one extra stop of light in darkened conditions when photographing moving subjects. The f/4 doesn't. Winner: f/2.8.
% L4 @, x) `( L( i$ k$ w: E& w) e" s9 v7 D' { D% i
3) The f/4 is lighter and smaller. Winner f/4.
6 W1 e8 j5 I; ?$ v% b
# W7 I% |- {3 i6 m1 m4) The wider aperture of the f/2.8 can offer more creative possibilities, especially when taking portraits. Winner: f/2.8.
# s2 Z8 a! c A7 o4 ^) ]( e& n* d, M9 S/ o! p: `/ u) l
5) The f/2.8 has better bokeh (creaminess of the blurred areas). Winner: f/2.8. |
|