6#cactus_2009 0 r8 y9 i3 v% T/ a( G' O. I2 p4 v
This may be a rare case but when rabbithill road was finished through all the way to 23rd ave., Whitemud Oak subdivision emerged as a mid-level residentials, so it is not the best of riverbend area. If 1-5 ranking with 5 the best is used, it probably will be 3 only.
6# cactus_2009 $ M8 q- j6 i3 H/ W- G0 U* H# g; N$ M) ?2 s- U: t+ A
This may be a rare case but when rabbithill road was finished through all the way to 23rd ave., Whitemud Oak subdivision emerged as a mid-level residentials, so it is not the best ...8 m: w+ ]: i$ u |5 o$ \
ceramistpalace 发表于 2010-1-17 21:29
5 d5 H, A8 ~! ~: t K) T+ `
0 [9 i- K4 \ `+ l; ` CSo which area in riverbend is considered as 5 then?
So which area in riverbend is considered as 5 then? . Q; N' v' r- Q0 z- E% |" v特北京 发表于 2010-1-18 09:32
) V7 \" m/ t0 W6 N
I would think, for older areas, eagleridge, whitemud creek, newer areas like magrath summit, terwillegar gardens etc. are the 5s. But what the 1-5 ranking I suggested is only a rough classification, for some particular areas within the 5s, one may consider them as 5 plus which are even better.