6#cactus_2009 ; e, [2 V6 S) |2 b) Z0 m) u+ D( |' O" [& \: H. S6 k, Y
This may be a rare case but when rabbithill road was finished through all the way to 23rd ave., Whitemud Oak subdivision emerged as a mid-level residentials, so it is not the best of riverbend area. If 1-5 ranking with 5 the best is used, it probably will be 3 only.
6# cactus_2009 ( b% {: }* |- B( s d. M2 R5 |8 x d0 ^# q5 o- }4 Z
This may be a rare case but when rabbithill road was finished through all the way to 23rd ave., Whitemud Oak subdivision emerged as a mid-level residentials, so it is not the best ... , Y& n3 O5 _- U3 A' [ O; Pceramistpalace 发表于 2010-1-17 21:29
- I6 n8 C; d8 x2 T; r. P+ x7 Q6 T1 J! D! N( `+ L' a. m. a5 j0 T( E
So which area in riverbend is considered as 5 then?
So which area in riverbend is considered as 5 then?( ~+ d5 F- p) O' t, T1 k$ A
特北京 发表于 2010-1-18 09:32
% p e' w# V( Y, X( ]5 AI would think, for older areas, eagleridge, whitemud creek, newer areas like magrath summit, terwillegar gardens etc. are the 5s. But what the 1-5 ranking I suggested is only a rough classification, for some particular areas within the 5s, one may consider them as 5 plus which are even better.